Attackfrog
Attackfrog
About
- Username
- Attackfrog
- Joined
- Visits
- 880
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Bravo0413 said:
Attackfrog said:The rework will consist of:
-added two or three new ways for survivors to wake up
-reduced Freddy move speed (due to the ranged nature of his power)
-improved sound cues for when he is invisible (increase sound of footsteps and increased environmental interactions, grass etc)
-removed the skill check penalty while survivors are asleep (we thought his ability to hurt the survivors in dream realm was penalty enough)
Does that about sum it up?
"Now when survivors drop pallets they will wake up"
Or crouch repeatedly very quickly they will wake up.
Or turn on a flashlight.
Or run.
Or simply exist...
-
Also, if you see Attackfrog in game, he sucks.
Like REAL stupid and a terrible survivor. He should stick to killer but he camps a lot. Also runs NOED a lot.
Such a noob. Avoid him cuz he's dumb.
-
The rework will consist of:
-added two or three new ways for survivors to wake up
-reduced Freddy move speed (due to the ranged nature of his power)-improved sound cues for when he is invisible (increase sound of footsteps and increased environmental interactions, grass etc)
-removed the skill check penalty while survivors are asleep (we thought his ability to hurt the survivors in dream realm was penalty enough)
Does that about sum it up?
-
Sometimes it's just more efficient than wasting time carrying someone to a hook. It can be risky but hooking is sometimes more risky (ds and lack of hooks).
I slug probably 50% of the time (vs hooking). Sometimes they bleed out before I can find them again.
100% of the time I don't really care if it's fun for the survivor. That's not my job; it's the developers' jobs.
-
Take Franklin's demise and hit the ones with toolbox or flashlight as they run out. Makes it worth it.
-
It's a bit of a paradox:
If NOED activates, and there are more than two survivors left, I have not been playing well.
If I get more than one hook after NOED activates, the survivors are not playing very well.
-
@Lateral said:
@Attackfrog said:
@Lateral said:
Sometimes I just cant be arsed and decide to leave without trying because it's not enjoyable playing against some pay 2 win killer whose bought all killers for the most toxic perk build possible.It's with this sort of person, the person who feels the need to "pay 2 win" that it's not worth fighting against because their inevitably going to be some neurologically defective sociopath who thrives on misery.
Lol pay to win....
Yup, I paid for Freddy....
And just keep on paying.
Every match.
Still waiting for the "to win" part of that deal.
But I'm sure you're right.
Why focus on the only premium killer that is pay 2 lose when all others are pay 2 win?
Saying that, I love the challenge of both playing as and playing against freddy. Balance is fun, OP babied, hand-holding easy-mode crutchlordery is not.
I believe nurse and Billy are free, which most agree are the top rated.
Spirit is really good too, and probably the best rates paid killer (Myers is pretty good though too).
And Leatherface is a way worse billy. Unless you are just a fan of Leatherface you would never pay for him over the free hillbilly.
-
What is KH3?
-
Why is "camping" a thing?
Or "tunneling"?
Why not call those "defending the hook" or "lowest denominator" ?
-
@HawkAyeTheNoo said:
You could just push them out and move on to next game, does tbagging really trigger you that much. Grow a pair.There is always at least one triggered survivor in threads like these, defending the other kiddos.
To the OP: depending on your time zone, if possible, just play a little later in the evening. I have found there is FAR less juvenile behavior in later games (bed time and all). Just be wary of school breaks...all the kiddies stay up late and mommy let's em have internet access.
-
Omg seriously? Is this a serious concern?
Well clearly we should remove the skill check on DS because a proper crutch shouldn't have a requirement.
If everyone can't win with it, with even a modicum of skill, we need to make it more accessible.
-
@Lateral said:
Sometimes I just cant be arsed and decide to leave without trying because it's not enjoyable playing against some pay 2 win killer whose bought all killers for the most toxic perk build possible.It's with this sort of person, the person who feels the need to "pay 2 win" that it's not worth fighting against because their inevitably going to be some neurologically defective sociopath who thrives on misery.
Lol pay to win....
Yup, I paid for Freddy....
And just keep on paying.
Every match.
Still waiting for the "to win" part of that deal.
But I'm sure you're right.
-
@Detective_Jonathan said:
@powerbats said:
I have to laugh at all the salt here displayed over someone posting that they handled what someone here describe and the brokenly op and unbeatable 4 mans swf squad. Had the screenshot not have been of red ranks near 1 you'd all have said well it's not red ranks so it doesn't matter.
which is funny because if someone shows a red rank killer it then becomes well rank means nothing but because there was all the meta toxic perks according to some of the very same posters here.
Then it turned into let's use other insults to degrade them because gasp someone managed to beat the swat team at red ranks. You couldn't just say hey good job or well done or that's awesome to see you got them all type of thing, nope it's insults away.
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/41266/just-destroyed-a-wannabe-toxic-squad#latest
That thread a known killer main got a much different response and there's plenty of other thread examples where the treatment is different and @Attackfrog at least got some joking in with his post.
Thanks for the back-up, though most of the people that are berating me are either people who hate me due to recent drama or just because they need someone to gang up on. Appreciate it though.
I stand by what I said... If we beat people when they are packing DS, we need to keep it on the hush hush! How else will we ever get that perk changed?
Next time, block out the DS perk so we don't know!
If you lose, you gotta screenshot and HIGHLIGHT the DS perk!
Them's the forum rules!
-
@Paddy4583 said:
Detective_Jonathan said:Oh I see it’s because there’s a toxic survivor in chat trying to stir talking smack..... oh no wait!
Why call out their perks it’s not like your not running all your crutches too! Looks like the average scores of a survivor farm, tunnel and rehook fest to me, no skill to see here move along...
Killers don't have crutch perks, or at least any perk that gives them a free "do-over".
@Detective_Jonathan :
In fairness, this just supports survivors' claims that DS isn't an unfair/broken perk....thanks a lot!Now we'll NEVER see it reworked...
-
@powerbats said:
@Attackfrog said:
I can see some people still defend the "ranking" system.It's not a terrible system...if it weren't so misleading (especially for new players, who it is designed to protect).
It IS achievable by all players, should they decide to.invest the time. It is not achieved by all players (@powerbats, I do not know how to display the difference. You suggest that one negates the other but this is untrue. I am not sure how to best explain how this is true and negates the idea of "ranks", as they are portrayed in this game).
The point is: this game has no rank system. The system it calls "rank" is merely a third (and unnecessary) system to portray a player's time investment.
It is designed to protect new players, but due to the ease of abuse, it does the opposite: allows more hardcore players to bully them for more bloodpoints.
As an fyi: it's like the old WoW pvp realms where slightly higher levels could rank the low ranking zones. (I reference wow a lot...it shows my age lol)
I do understand but I think without it you'd get low skill players and lets not kid ourselves here there's some with 500+ hours that still suck. There's quite a few that can' get past rank 15 and quite a few have posted about it saying killers are op etc.
Now if you're realistically talking about playing with sharks and say you're maining a survivor only it's really around 1k hours or more that you really start to learn how to play. By then you should have the following general knowledge.
Be able to hit great skill check not 100% of the time but at least 50% of the time
Know where totem spawns are and be cleansing them.
Know where generators are for the most part and which ones have priority to be done ie don't 3 gen yourself or if you see it happening work on gens to counter it.
Know the map tiles and where the safe and unsafe pallets are, where good and bad looping spots are, where good and bad places to hide are.
Don't be stupid with Hag traps near hooked players ( we all bang our heads against desks on this one when we see it.)
Do safe unhooks like not running into the camping Bubba holding his chainsaw aloft and who eats Borrowed Time users for breakfast etc.
I could go on here but you get the point but without a rank system as it stands you'd get stuck with those horrible potatoes against say a Marth because you think they're good enough due to hours played.
Now it looks like we are arguing about which word we are describing. I agree with your bullet points. To me, that is more of a "leveling" system rather than a way to rank players. But whatever they choose to call it, I agree that there should be a way to place killers into matches with people of similar skill. Skill tiers/ranks/levels would make sense. The current system of rank/level/pseudo-skill is clearly broken because I consistently get matches against very skilled players at low ranks and various potatoes in high ranks.
I think it has some degree of success because, unless someone is a COMPLETE potato, you can't help but gain at least a little skill by sinking in 500 hours. It's just too easy to manipulate.
-
I can see some people still defend the "ranking" system.
It's not a terrible system...if it weren't so misleading (especially for new players, who it is designed to protect).
It IS achievable by all players, should they decide to.invest the time. It is not achieved by all players (@powerbats, I do not know how to display the difference. You suggest that one negates the other but this is untrue. I am not sure how to best explain how this is true and negates the idea of "ranks", as they are portrayed in this game).
The point is: this game has no rank system. The system it calls "rank" is merely a third (and unnecessary) system to portray a player's time investment.
It is designed to protect new players, but due to the ease of abuse, it does the opposite: allows more hardcore players to bully them for more bloodpoints.
As an fyi: it's like the old WoW pvp realms where slightly higher levels could rank the low ranking zones. (I reference wow a lot...it shows my age lol)
-
@AlwaysInAGoodShape said:
@Attackfrog
@MasterI think people who believe DBD has a ranking system should play Dota 2 for a month and see if they can manage to reach the higher ranks there as well. Maybe that'll teach them what a ranking system is.
It's really mind-blowing that if so many bad people reach rank 1 and admit not understanding the game fully yet, others still deny this experience, and if not that the facts.
DBD has the most deceitful seasonal grinding system there is.
Yes! Thank you! I play D3 periodically (usually when a season looks interesting) so that is sort of my Gold Standard to what a season and season ranking should be (I end up usually around rank #132999...give or take a few thousand).
There is a rank 1 and ONLY one rank 1. And it is 100% based on gameplay and achievement within the game (and how quickly it is accomplished). There is a real competitive feel to it (well, not for me)
Currently, DbD has 3 leveling systems (Bloodweb, player level and "rank"), but no actual way to rank players based on merit.
-
@Jack11803 said:
@Attackfrog said:
@Milo said:
Hm....All Male characters tbhIt's sexist. Someday male characters will be equally represented in dbd.
Until then, we need to arbitrarily give an award to a male dbd character. Merit be damned!
People don’t use male characters because their crouch position looks stupid and isn’t even hiding. I’ve said it before, even in the back brace I have to wear I could maintain a way lower profile position while maintaining mobility
Just another example of male stereotyping in this game... This game portrays men as if ALL men are not flexible. So sexist!!!
Someday, us men will be portrayed as the delicate and beautiful flowers that we are.
-
@powerbats said:
@Attackfrog said:
Lol what? Have you played this game? This is the only game where everyone can actually be rank 1....And then still play with rank 20s! How is that any sort of rank system? Or do you mean "leveling system"? Because they have that...
I've got over 1551 hours played and I've hit rank 1 both sides so yes I've played this game and no not everyone can be rank one since if that was true there'd never be anyone at 16-20 or stuck at certain ranks due to skill.
In "levels".
This ranking system is completely bonkers. And meaningless.
Yet it seems to keep to work on keeping some out of ranks they don't belong at otherwise again everyone would always be rank 1 all the time.
@powerbats said:
Ok what are your suggestions to replace it then, you want to remove something but don't have anything to replace it.There doesn't need to be a ranking system (unless it is done by actually ranking the players in the two factions). The current system measures playtime (so long as you play mediocre most of the time). I consistently play against groups of rank 2,3 and 15,18...or any variation thereof.
The point is you'd be guaranteeing that a high % of the time that rank 1 players would be playing noobs instead of the chances that are currently there.
Again if it worked like you claimed everyone would be rank 1 and the lower ranks would have almost no players.
What is the point? I get wanting to play with people of the same.skill level but how would having no system change anything about how the game is played now? (Ie: rank 20s can play with rank 1s).
You keep missing the point because you can't accept your logic is flawed, logic clearly dictates that if a small amount of variation happens now. That an even larger amount of variation would happen due to the underlying variables being changed.
In other words your idea is flawed because it would increase the disparity that can happen from an occasional occurrence to a common occurrence.
Everyone, eventually does, get to rank one. Every has the ability to get to rank one (which defeats the purpose of a "ranking" system).
The system is only gated one way: new players aren't supposed to be grouped with rank 1 players (yet they due). People derank to play against new players.
The current system is completely bonkers and should not be called a "rank" system at all. It is more like a leveling system (like WoW....everyone can be max rank, yet not everybody is.).
-
It seems that people that harass post game have a very limited set of words/phrases. It s almost always the usual:
-trash ____
-kill____self
And various racial slurs.Just an observation. It likely means low levels of intelligence though.
-
That graph does look pretty sound...almost like it was made by a real scientist.
Your arguments are flawless too, but the graph really swayed me!
-
Lol, but this "ranking system" works!
See the other thread about the ranking system on the general discussions page.
-
@Mochan said:
@ModernFable said:
The system is more an assessment of time played than skillful play. The system increases queue times significantly, and in some cases indefinitely. And in its attempt to find a “balanced” match, it diminishes the connection quality in the process.
This is nonsense. Dead by Daylight has the only community I know of that believes in the mass delusion that Rank does not measure skill. What garbage. This is the kind of mentality a person who thinks he's hot stuff, but actually can't get out of Rank 15, has.
Newsflash: rank measures your ability to consistently perform objectives. If you can't consistently perform objecives, you de-pip. And de-rank eventually.
It absolutely measures your skill. Only the best players who can consistently achieve objectives get to Rank 1.
Stop whining and pretending that Rank does't measure anything, just to keep your fragile ego that you are an actual skilled player, intact. If you are Rank 1 you're good at this game. If you are Rank 15, not so good.
And for the record, I am Rank 15. I accept this and realize I have a long way to go.
Lol what? Have you played this game? This is the only game where everyone can actually be rank 1....And then still play with rank 20s! How is that any sort of rank system? Or do you mean "leveling system"? Because they have that...
In "levels".
This ranking system is completely bonkers. And meaningless.
@powerbats said:
Ok what are your suggestions to replace it then, you want to remove something but don't have anything to replace it.There doesn't need to be a ranking system (unless it is done by actually ranking the players in the two factions). The current system measures playtime (so long as you play mediocre most of the time). I consistently play against groups of rank 2,3 and 15,18...or any variation thereof.
What is the point? I get wanting to play with people of the same.skill level but how would having no system change anything about how the game is played now? (Ie: rank 20s can play with rank 1s).
-
Camping the hooks is totally up to the killer. I have had 4ks where it worked way better than it should And 0ks where they outplayed me.
And sometimes it's not about the victory...it's about making that cocky teabagger miserable, even if it means a 1k. Totally worth it.
I don't always camp, but when I do, I damn well mean to.
-
@Kamikaze_Rose said:
Attackfrog said:@Milo said:
Hm....All Male characters tbh
It's sexist. Someday male characters will be equally represented in dbd.
Until then, we need to arbitrarily give an award to a male dbd character. Merit be damned!
Give it a rest.
I can't stand by and allow men to be underrepresented in this game.
-
Buff the other killers instead.
-
@ItsDeezyBruh said:
Attackfrog said:If you live in california, then I would.imagine that someone would indeed bring a lawsuit against for being racist. Because everyone is offended by everyone there.
Most level-headed people, I imagine, believe you are free to tunnel whoever the hell you want.
Nice dig at CA there. Something unfortunate happen to you here or what? You seem traumatized... Lol no sweat, CA born and raised and i dont like it much
I lived there for years. NorCal=high cost for low quality just about everything (housing, food...anything). Running a business was a nightmare for taxes and lawsuits every time you let someone go. I haven't lived in every state, but I have a long list of things that are by far the worst in CA.
Except sushi. Best sushi I have ever had in the states was in restaurants in CA.
-
@Milo said:
Hm....All Male characters tbhIt's sexist. Someday male characters will be equally represented in dbd.
Until then, we need to arbitrarily give an award to a male dbd character. Merit be damned!
-
I didn't read the entire thread, so maybe it's already said, but two things:
- Have you tried watching YouTube videos of people playing against nur se? It might help (helped me with a few killers)
- Maybe you are just out matched. No offense meant. I know when I am playing against a very good survivor who knows how to loop and juke that I am probably just out played. I don't practice enough and maybe I am just not good enough to beat him/her, so bottom line is that player is just plain better than I am. Might be the case here.
-
@Vietfox said:
I've been playing solo for the last 4 hours and i've been dodged in 9 out of 10 lobbies. Seriously, uninstall DbD and go play something else.
Some of you will say "oh, maybe they saw 4 survivors spawn at the same time". Some did, but MANY others saw me alone in the lobby, then TWO more spawning at the same time and then leave.
Seriously lobbydodgers, grow a damn pair. This is getting ridiculous.Might have been mentioned (I didn't read 3 pages), but maybe they read the forums.
Sometimes I dodge if I see a forum poster I know to be specifically toxic (only happened once actually), but Sometimes I specifically tunnel and camp (also only happened once actually) a survivor biased forum poster.
Maybe you post too much lol.
-
Bye Kate!
-
Lol that you say they face "ranks hacked killers"...
I remember when i first played in beta against "rank hacked" survivors....lol quit the game for a good six months.
A new player wanting to play ki!ler? Lol good luck.
-
If you live in california, then I would.imagine that someone would indeed bring a lawsuit against for being racist. Because everyone is offended by everyone there.
Most level-headed people, I imagine, believe you are free to tunnel whoever the hell you want.
-
The player base in this game is ridiculously juvenile. I can stand a few months of playing (because the game is generally VERY fun), but then the player base kills it for me.
Too much garbage to spend time or money on.
Yet I keep coming back lol.
I wish there was an AI mode.
-
You can always tell when someone gets stomped in game and exactly who/what he got stomped by...
-
I lol at the people trying to tear you down.
-there is no comparable killer perk to DS...so running NOED is not analogous....AT ALL.
-you never got to open gates, so you actually ran a 3-perk build
-in fairness, the toxic builds, post game.chat comments and obvious smurfing suggests you were probably playing against immature kids, but if they play that much, they should know better.
-any time you rek a swf group it's a solid victory. And the more sweaty they are, the better!
-
@RotBb said:
Attackfrog said:@RotBb said:
I knew the guy had borrowed time, so I blocked the basement, is this bannable? If I remember correctly, it’s not.
Not if you were doing it until it wore off then hit him.
That's called "well played".
Alright, thanks pal. I didn’t lock them down there or anything, just stood there for like ten seconds and hit them.
Yup! That's just solid playstyle. Not bannable or even "toxic" .
-
@RotBb said:
I knew the guy had borrowed time, so I blocked the basement, is this bannable? If I remember correctly, it’s not.Not if you were doing it until it wore off then hit him.
That's called "well played".
-
Good survivors don't seem to have a problem countering NOED when I run it. They have either cleansed all totems by the time gates pop or notice after 1 down that it's up and cleanse it.
Bad survivors are usually dead before gates can pop...so....
Tl;dr: Good survivors constantly counter it: no perk necessary.
-
DS is not comparable to NOED.
Like....at all.
If NOED allowed killers to hit a skill check and rehook a survivor after an escape, THAT would be comparable.
But I still lol when people try to compare them.
-
What's the point of doing that? Just to be a dick...that's the point. I would report that garbage.
-
Maybe it's never on the shrine because everyone actually already has it.
-
There should be a slope up, it looks like it is just to your right.
I know though...sometimes I walk around the whole same thing without seeing the ramp up!
-
Lol. Yes, let's buff medkits.
-
@TheMidnightRidr said:
Half of this is subjective, thoughAnd the other half is opinion.
-
@DwightsLifeMatters said:
Why are you surprised? This is absolutely normal. If I bring this loadout against obvious swf bully groups they dc aswell. Nothing special.Doc with distressing and ebony mori gets a lot of dcs too lol!
-
@Attackfrog said:
@JammyJewels said:
Attackfrog said:@JammyJewels said:
Attackfrog said:
@JammyJewels said: FoggyDownpour said:
The only time you should ever DC is when you have something in real life going on or you are stuck and the killer/survivors can't help you. End of story. Rage quitting should never be something you do. Can't handle the game and the everything that comes with it? Don't play. I've never understood why people DC, just take it and move on to the next match. Getting thrashed as killer? Getting tunneled as survivor? Getting camped? Flashlighted with every downed survivor? Just keep playing and move on, a DC won't do you or anyone else any good.
But then what happens when a fun time turns into a bad one? Where a game where you thought you had fun then causes stress? No one plans to have a bad day. I say there’s two types of rage quitters. The ones that DC because they simply can’t accept a loss and then there are those that become so stressed through a multitude of things that they have no say over (like a SWF communicating to sabo hooks right in front of the killers’ faces).It is not healthy for some. Stress, for me, is detrimental due to my Diabetes and how stress increases the glucose produced in my liver, therefore able to make me ill. If playing this game causes your stress levels to get to unhealthy levels, I believe even the developers would agree it might be in your best interest to play something else. If this were the dbd e-sports championship and there was 3 million dollars on the line, it might be worth it. But it's not. So it's not. If I were to go and play something else the money that I have spent on Cosmetics and the game itself would become a waste. However, I dare say that it is indeed unhealthy: but I am being as productive as I would be stepping outside in England trying to catch a tan. I do try to have fun, I really do, but that now only happens for me when I face Nurses and Spirits, or play as Spirit or run into friendly survivors.
There aren’t enough relaxing games released nowadays anyway. PlayStation Home was something I’d always relax on before it shut down and most games nowadays have a money-grabbing online service. Like Red Dead Redemption 2: try fishing peacefully and you’ll be shot in the back of the head by some a-holes that don’t understand the word pacifism. If there were games I could go and play to relax I would. But none I’ve encountered allow for a social aspect within a relaxing setting.
Really!? For what it's worth, I play dbd for a while...then it becomes stressful and not worth my time, so I play other games and eventually come back.
Try playing coop versus ai games. Heroes of the Storm versus AI is my go to for brainless fun. Fun and easygoing at ANY level and there are so many characters for different play styles.
Warframe is AWESOME. I have played it in varying amounts for years. Never gets old and very fun/no pressure...so long as you over gear and find a good group (most are). You can play solo too.
Killing Floor 2 is fun, relaxing, brainless zombie fps fun too.
Dont flame me....but WoW is actually VERY easygoing nowadays, unless you hardcore PVp or end game raid...but anything entry or mid level is VERY easygoing.
Those are just a few of my go to games when I don't want sweaty palms and want a Netflix show playing in the background.
I am a Console Pheasant, my dear. Tried Heroes of the Storm... and kept destroying teams with my friend. I played Warframe for a while until I got Trinity Prime and Oberon (healers, which is my go-to role in any game) and then... I knew no one else who played it, so I never had anyone who actually wanted me to play the game with them. Killing Floor was fun but it became too repetitive and WoW, I’ve never touched.
I would most definitely enjoy this game more with friends. But when all of your friends move on to Fortnite and Red Dead Redemption is unplayable because every 20 seconds you’re back at the deceased screen again... it is disheartening.
Perhaps I should play Civilisation like Matthieu once recommended. I just feel disheartened to a point where all games are unappealing, and where I’d rather slide into threads and just talk. Hell, if that VR chat was on PS4 I would make my avatar a tiny anime girl and yell like a drunk fully grown Scottish man for the laughs.
Well there you go! The forum game is the real end game for ANY game.
I wish Marvel Heroes was still around because I that was probably my all time favorite go to game AND forum.
That reminds me....there is DCUO too....also fun....I play it for a few months on, then.bored and a few months off but the forum is fun too.
-
@JammyJewels said:
Attackfrog said:@JammyJewels said:
Attackfrog said:
@JammyJewels said: FoggyDownpour said:
The only time you should ever DC is when you have something in real life going on or you are stuck and the killer/survivors can't help you. End of story. Rage quitting should never be something you do. Can't handle the game and the everything that comes with it? Don't play. I've never understood why people DC, just take it and move on to the next match. Getting thrashed as killer? Getting tunneled as survivor? Getting camped? Flashlighted with every downed survivor? Just keep playing and move on, a DC won't do you or anyone else any good.
But then what happens when a fun time turns into a bad one? Where a game where you thought you had fun then causes stress? No one plans to have a bad day. I say there’s two types of rage quitters. The ones that DC because they simply can’t accept a loss and then there are those that become so stressed through a multitude of things that they have no say over (like a SWF communicating to sabo hooks right in front of the killers’ faces).It is not healthy for some. Stress, for me, is detrimental due to my Diabetes and how stress increases the glucose produced in my liver, therefore able to make me ill. If playing this game causes your stress levels to get to unhealthy levels, I believe even the developers would agree it might be in your best interest to play something else. If this were the dbd e-sports championship and there was 3 million dollars on the line, it might be worth it. But it's not. So it's not. If I were to go and play something else the money that I have spent on Cosmetics and the game itself would become a waste. However, I dare say that it is indeed unhealthy: but I am being as productive as I would be stepping outside in England trying to catch a tan. I do try to have fun, I really do, but that now only happens for me when I face Nurses and Spirits, or play as Spirit or run into friendly survivors.
There aren’t enough relaxing games released nowadays anyway. PlayStation Home was something I’d always relax on before it shut down and most games nowadays have a money-grabbing online service. Like Red Dead Redemption 2: try fishing peacefully and you’ll be shot in the back of the head by some a-holes that don’t understand the word pacifism. If there were games I could go and play to relax I would. But none I’ve encountered allow for a social aspect within a relaxing setting.
Really!? For what it's worth, I play dbd for a while...then it becomes stressful and not worth my time, so I play other games and eventually come back.
Try playing coop versus ai games. Heroes of the Storm versus AI is my go to for brainless fun. Fun and easygoing at ANY level and there are so many characters for different play styles.
Warframe is AWESOME. I have played it in varying amounts for years. Never gets old and very fun/no pressure...so long as you over gear and find a good group (most are). You can play solo too.
Killing Floor 2 is fun, relaxing, brainless zombie fps fun too.
Dont flame me....but WoW is actually VERY easygoing nowadays, unless you hardcore PVp or end game raid...but anything entry or mid level is VERY easygoing.
Those are just a few of my go to games when I don't want sweaty palms and want a Netflix show playing in the background.
I am a Console Pheasant, my dear. Tried Heroes of the Storm... and kept destroying teams with my friend. I played Warframe for a while until I got Trinity Prime and Oberon (healers, which is my go-to role in any game) and then... I knew no one else who played it, so I never had anyone who actually wanted me to play the game with them. Killing Floor was fun but it became too repetitive and WoW, I’ve never touched.
I would most definitely enjoy this game more with friends. But when all of your friends move on to Fortnite and Red Dead Redemption is unplayable because every 20 seconds you’re back at the deceased screen again... it is disheartening.
Perhaps I should play Civilisation like Matthieu once recommended. I just feel disheartened to a point where all games are unappealing, and where I’d rather slide into threads and just talk. Hell, if that VR chat was on PS4 I would make my avatar a tiny anime girl and yell like a drunk fully grown Scottish man for the laughs.
Well there you go! The forum game is the real end game for ANY game.
I wish Marvel Heroes was still around because I that was probably my all time favorite go to game AND forum.
-
I read all of it. The current rank system has always seemed absolutely silly and arbritrary. The addition of swf makes it even more so (due to "high" ranks being placed with "low" ranks....so stupid, which completely negates the rank system purpose)
Your idea makes sense...And might actually make rank mean something in this game.
Until then, I won't pay attention to it because it is absolutely stupid.
-
@JammyJewels said:
Attackfrog said:@JammyJewels said:
FoggyDownpour said:
The only time you should ever DC is when you have something in real life going on or you are stuck and the killer/survivors can't help you. End of story. Rage quitting should never be something you do. Can't handle the game and the everything that comes with it? Don't play. I've never understood why people DC, just take it and move on to the next match. Getting thrashed as killer? Getting tunneled as survivor? Getting camped? Flashlighted with every downed survivor? Just keep playing and move on, a DC won't do you or anyone else any good. :( But then what happens when a fun time turns into a bad one? Where a game where you thought you had fun then causes stress? No one plans to have a bad day. I say there’s two types of rage quitters. The ones that DC because they simply can’t accept a loss and then there are those that become so stressed through a multitude of things that they have no say over (like a SWF communicating to sabo hooks right in front of the killers’ faces).
It is not healthy for some. Stress, for me, is detrimental due to my Diabetes and how stress increases the glucose produced in my liver, therefore able to make me ill.
If playing this game causes your stress levels to get to unhealthy levels, I believe even the developers would agree it might be in your best interest to play something else.
If this were the dbd e-sports championship and there was 3 million dollars on the line, it might be worth it.
But it's not. So it's not.
If I were to go and play something else the money that I have spent on Cosmetics and the game itself would become a waste. However, I dare say that it is indeed unhealthy: but I am being as productive as I would be stepping outside in England trying to catch a tan. I do try to have fun, I really do, but that now only happens for me when I face Nurses and Spirits, or play as Spirit or run into friendly survivors.
There aren’t enough relaxing games released nowadays anyway. PlayStation Home was something I’d always relax on before it shut down and most games nowadays have a money-grabbing online service. Like Red Dead Redemption 2: try fishing peacefully and you’ll be shot in the back of the head by some a-holes that don’t understand the word pacifism. If there were games I could go and play to relax I would. But none I’ve encountered allow for a social aspect within a relaxing setting.
Really!? For what it's worth, I play dbd for a while...then it becomes stressful and not worth my time, so I play other games and eventually come back.
Try playing coop versus ai games. Heroes of the Storm versus AI is my go to for brainless fun. Fun and easygoing at ANY level and there are so many characters for different play styles.
Warframe is AWESOME. I have played it in varying amounts for years. Never gets old and very fun/no pressure...so long as you over gear and find a good group (most are). You can play solo too.
Killing Floor 2 is fun, relaxing, brainless zombie fps fun too.
Dont flame me....but WoW is actually VERY easygoing nowadays, unless you hardcore PVp or end game raid...but anything entry or mid level is VERY easygoing.
Those are just a few of my go to games when I don't want sweaty palms and want a Netflix show playing in the background.