Vietfox
Vietfox
About
- Username
- Vietfox
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
I love long hard road out of hell song@Tucking_Friggered said:Round 2
-
This thread has been corrupted by @TreemanXDTreemanXD said:https://youtu.be/f7RKOP87tt4 Oh wait this isn’t rock... oh well
Please tbag and ban this forum member. -
Some survivors don't understand that it's way better to do gens and let the killers have their hook than all 3 bodyblocking or messing around with the flashlight and NOT doing gens just to avoid a single hook (most of the times they fail though, which makes it even worse).@fcc2014 said:I downed the obsession in 60's no generators done. As soon as i go to hook them Quentin breaks a hook and goes to the next one and breaks it(they were 99%). The obsession wiggles off. I go after him and get him within 45s. Wiggles and hits me with ds since no hooks nearby. I down him again and someone tries to flashlight save. I get him to the hook and just start shocking like crazy all 3 are at the hook. I do this for a bit. Hey no generators being worked on why not. he does get off i try to tunnel but the obsession gets in my way i get them hook them and shock the ground over and over as they try to unhook(laughing my ass of the whole time) They die. I get Quentin again he dies on the hook. I get another 1 with 1 generator left and the hatch on the hill near the generator and the survivor. I get the last person everyone dead. I got 27k plus 25% modifier in all categories and 4 stack of BBQ plus a 30k daily.
-
I knew you made a thread about the same topic some time ago:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/40941/ds-tier-3-should-have-obsession-priority-over-2-and-1/p1
-
@fcc2014
Lmao when they all gather just to call you trash after dying. (probably because they rushed to the hooks instead of doing gens, really smart) -
WORKING AS INTENDED.@MandyTalk said:Mine are jinxed, everytime I use a BPS my game crashes!
-
@SpongeBob420Pants got banned. I'm asking because some time ago i made a joke about myself, someone thought it was aimed to him, reported it and i got banned.@douggie123 said:
What ban?@Vietfox said:Is this related to his/her permaban?
This ######### happens in this forum. -
Is this related to his/her permaban?
-
Yeah, reactions for petty things like tbagging.@Orion said:@Vietfox said:
Still a bad comparison. Blaming someone who has been really bullied is horrible and has nothing to do with what i was saying.You were saying that humans are to blame for having human reactions. Seem like the shoe fits just fine.
-
Still a bad comparison. Blaming someone who has been really bullied is horrible and has nothing to do with what i was saying.@Orion said:@Vietfox said:
Bullying is an issue, tbagging is not. Since you compared both things this is why i mentioned it.No, I compared your blaming the people who are affected by it with bullies blaming their victims for being affected by bullying. That's what I wrote, that's what I said, that's what I meant.
-
Bullying is an issue, tbagging is not. Since you compared both things this is why i mentioned it.@Orion said:@Vietfox said:
No it's not.
1 - tbagging is far from being a bully thing. If you think it is i guess we have different opinions on what bullying really is.
2 - since i don't find tbagging a serious issue my advice is to just ignore it, simple as that. In what way could tbagging affect someone? Seriously.Yes, it is.
1 - You don't have to be a bully to use the same psychological tactics as bullies. That's just absurd. Of course, you know that, which is why you put words in my mouth.
2 - This discussion is about whether or not teabagging is toxic. It has nothing to do with whether or not it's a serious issue. Not sure why you're responding to something nobody said. -
Childish =/= have fun or make innocent jokes.@PiiFree said:@Vietfox said:
Or maybe they should take it as an advice instead of reinforce those childish emotions. I thought this game was meant for mature public.It's very ironic that you say the guys that get emotional over teabagging should grow up, instead of the people that actually teabag, the childish stuff.
I would rather be dead than being serious all the time. -
No it's not.@Orion said:@Roobnus said:
Imagine living in 2019, where having emotions makes you a [BAD WORD].It's a typical bully tactic. The victim is to blame for having a normal, human reaction to the bullying, as opposed to the bully being to blame for being an [BAD WORD].
1 - tbagging is far from being a bully thing. If you think it is i guess we have different opinions on what bullying really is.
2 - since i don't find tbagging a serious issue my advice is to just ignore it, simple as that. In what way could tbagging affect someone? Seriously. -
Ok you get mad because someone spams the crouch button and i don't. Guess i'll have less issues in my life.@PiiFree said:@Vietfox said:
Making more sense doesn't mean one of those things it's not a problem, don't twist my words.No it doesn't, but it also has absolutely no relevance. You're good at trying to change the topic to get out of a tricky situation.
Your statement says that people who get mad over a game have a problem.
And I'll remember that statement, because it's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Games are very emotional so naturally people have fun, get mad, get sad, get angry, get horny and wet or whatever. It's the whole point of playing games. An emotional rollercoaster.
-
Making more sense doesn't mean one of those things it's not a problem, don't twist my words.PiiFree said:@Vietfox said:
It makes more sense to get mad because of 4 DS or being camped than a simple tbag and come to the forums to complain about it.
DS or being camped affects the match's result, tbagging doesn't (unless killer is a snowflake)it doesn't change your original statement:
@Vietfox said:
People who get mad because of a game has a problem, period.Don't twist the words now.
Also, the reason why it doesn't affect gameplay is also the sole reason why it's toxic. If it had a gameplay related purpose, I'd consider it being a tactic but it's not. The sole purpose is to annoy the opposite side.
-
It makes more sense to get mad because of 4 DS or being camped than a simple tbag and come to the forums to complain about it.@PiiFree said:@Vietfox said:
They don't necessarily need to get mad. In many occasions i've said to the killers "camp 10/10, would be camped again".
Anyway, if you wanna turn this into a "killers vs survivors" thread then have it your way, but i got better things to do.That's a great way to avoid the point I made.
Has nothing to do with Killer or Survivor, it was just an example. I can also use Killers that get mad after getting hit by 4 DS in a row.
According to your logic, all players that get mad during gameplay because of the game "have a problem". So again, I didin't know that having emotions is a problem.
DS or being camped affects the match's result, tbagging doesn't (unless killer is a snowflake) -
They don't necessarily need to get mad. In many occasions i've said to the killers "camp 10/10, would be camped again".@PiiFree said:@Vietfox said:
I wouldn't say 580 survivors are "most of survivors". It's easy to reach that number even if you started to play DbD one year ago.
Both sides got problems because they are all people, don't forget that.
I've gotten lots of salt from killers in both PC and PS4 but i wouldn't dare to say most killers have a problem because that would be a lie.Most of the survivors get mad when you camp them from the start. According to your logic, that means they "have a problem".
That's a fact I can prove easily. I can facecamp 100 Survivors in a row and at least 90 of them will get mad about it. This leads to the conclusion that most of the Survivors have a problem.
Anyway, if you wanna turn this into a "killers vs survivors" thread then have it your way, but i got better things to do. -
I wouldn't say 580 survivors are "most of survivors". It's easy to reach that number even if you started to play DbD one year ago.@PiiFree said:@Vietfox said:
@PiiFree said:
According to your logic, most of the Survivors in DbD have a problem because my steam profile to date has 580 mostly insulting comments, exclusively coming from mad Survivors.
Are you saying all those players have a problem because they got mad over a game?Yes, glad you understand.
I'll keep that quote in mind.
Both sides got problems because they are all people, don't forget that.
I've gotten lots of salt from killers in both PC and PS4 but i wouldn't dare to say most killers have a problem because that would be a lie. -
Why? Those points are for you as well.@RoKrueger said:When I see BPS beeing played, I hope the first survivor I kill is the one that played it
-
I can deal with that lol, it's just a ######### game.@PiiFree said:@Vietfox said:
What consequences, hait mail? I can deal with that by deleting them.
People who get mad because of a game has a problem, period.No, you get slugged, camped, tunneled or whatever the person decides to do.
Yes, glad you understand.PiiFree said:@Vietfox said:
What consequences, hait mail? I can deal with that by deleting them.
People who get mad because of a game has a problem, period.According to your logic, most of the Survivors in DbD have a problem because my steam profile to date has 580 mostly insulting comments, exclusively coming from mad Survivors.
Are you saying all those players have a problem because they got mad over a game?
-
What consequences, hait mail? I can deal with that by deleting them.@PiiFree said:How you see it is totally irrelevant. It's very subjective, it's like a stranger waving their middle finger towards you. Some people laugh about it, others get angry and the hardcores go and beat the hell outta them.
It's solely depending on the person on the receiving end. Fact is, some people take it the wrong way so you should consider that when you teabag and expect the consequences for it.
People who get mad because of a game has a problem, period. -
It's fine as it is, i always use it when playing solo and works pretty well already.
-
I see it as a friendly taunt.@Eveline said:It can't be more immature than someone trying to piss others on purpose. It's mean. -
I don't run neither of them but there's nothing wrong if you wanna run those perks. Perks are meant to be used.
-
Immature is to get mad because someone spammed the crouch button.@Eveline said:Yes. If you do it you are immature. -
I could hear him crying lol.@Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
That poor boy, didja see the sorrow on his face when he missed that chainsaw? XD@Vietfox said: -
-
It is if your skin is made out of cotton.
-
It's pointless since the killer would know you can do that. Either you get instahooked or killer stands right next to you waiting for that free unbreakable.
It's a bit like having the chance of unhooking yourself when being the last survivor, killer would just stand right in front of you. -
Oh yeah, funny and competent. Most of the times killers get to see us escaping through the exit gate 😂@Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
Alright.@chemical_reject said:
Yep just chemical_rejectDoc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
Is your tag the same as your forum name?chemical_reject said:@OrionsFury4789 @Doc_W__HOLLIDAY yes I tried calling him out awhile ago and he told me about the other person BUT to find out without a doubt that there is another person with a similar name u should add me on ps4. Name is the same. Then I could verify that it is a different guy lol
Just a heads up, I can be fairly loud at times, but it's always funny. Just ask @Vietfox 😂
Or like that day when i went to the basement to pick up your flashlight, Billy followed me and got out of there with it while he ate the wall. -
I wouldn't call it killer sided.@Poweas said:@Vietfox said:
Because they are too lazy to adapt.When did you become so killer sided? Every comment I see from you is always in favour of killers. You ditched survivor or something?
Can noed be prevented? Yes. Then it's not broken.
Besides, both sides got some stuff that can change the result of the match at the end of it, and i like that. If games were predictable they wouldn't be as interesting as they are. -
You are gonna have a tough life if you get affected that easily by anything.
-
Yeah i'm always like this, can't help it.@harry14141414 said:@Vietfox said:
Doesnt matter if you broke the rules, you are right. It's a joke that BHVR keeps supporting derankers as fog whisperers.so straightforward
-
-
Yes please.Boss said:Can we NOT have to see the Bloodweb tell us that we reached Bloodweb level 50 everytime we complete a level 50 Bloodweb?
-
In scenario A your team sucked and noed had little to do with the match's result.@Nickenzie said:
@Vietfox@Vietfox said:
Noed does NOT destroy solo survivors as long as they play smart. I spend half of my playtime as a solo survivor and i don't have any issue with noed because i know how to deal with that.@Nickenzie said:
@Vietfox@Vietfox said:
Tbh i'm usually drunk when playing solo as well, and still NOED is not an issue to me. Those who claim that X perk is broken it's because they want ez wins instead of looking for a way to deal with it.@Nickenzie said:
SWF aren't always a commando unit. @Vietfox plays with his friends drunk just so he can chill out, ya know?@MrsPiggyIsSoSneaky said:Also, that's another thing, for something to be fun, it needs to be balanced, you simply said just to have fun, nothing about balance.
i.e when you brought up the swf being fun and the game ONLY being fun when playing with friends.
Everyone knows i play more as a survivor than as a killer, and yet i think NOED is fine.
I'm starting to think NOED is fine, but I really don't like how the perk destroys solo survivors while SWF can take it down in a breeze. This needs to be changed, make NOED equally as strong for both groups of survivors.
Here are some scenarios on how NOED can destroy solo survivors:
Scenario A: You start cleansing totems but since you aren't participating in generator repairs, your team starts to struggle and eventually get sacrificed. You just helped the killer by directing your pressure to totems and not generators. This would be the 2 versus 3 scenario because you ACTUALLY helped the killer.
Scenario B: Same as before but this time, your survivor team is 3-man SWF and you're the solo in the team. They start pumping out generators like no tomorrow and now, you're on a timer to cleanse all 5 dull totems before they power the final generator. This would be scenario 1 versus 1 versus 3 because you aren't helping the killer and the SWF aren't helping you.
Scenario C: Let's assume you're using Small Game and you start hitting totems. You're doing so good until you struggle to find the last dull totem, but you won't give up. Eventually the exit gates were powered on and you're scared out of your mind. Suddenly in the HUD, you see a survivor get injured instead of being downed. Now, you understand everything... A random survivor cleansed a dull totem which caused you to waste your time finding the non-existent 5th totem. This would be a 1 versus 1 versus 3 scenario because the randoms screwed up your mental counter while the killer was abusing that.
In scenario B i don't see any problem. Killers patrol gens, not totems, so should be easy to get rid of them. Whenever you play solo you gotta chamge your tactics and do what most randoms don't do.
For instance:
When i play solo i cleanse totems because most survivors don't give a ######### about them
When i play solo i don't go for the rescue (unless i'm close or strictly necessary) because i know most randoms do that, so i keep repairing gens.
Etc etc...
In scenario C i would say that it's way better this way than not finding the 5th totem and killers getting their noed. Better safe than sorry anyway, plus you got some bps for cleansing the other 4.
PS: with small game u can find the totems in no time. -
Ok then.@Tucking_Friggered said:@Vietfox said:
@Tucking_Friggered said:@The_Crusader said:
The thing is, everybody knows that if a killer seems really bad, they're definitely going to have NOED.
Likewise if you go against a killer that'd playing well, theres a chance they won't have it. The fact that this stays true to high rank proves that it's carrying some killers. Its there to make sure every killer can climb the ranks and feel good. You can use skill or the devs can hold your hand.
Why bother putting in the effort to win the hard way when you can just throw on NOED, Remember Me and Bloodwarden and cheese the ending?
The more you talk the more amusing you become. Everyone knows there are only high ranked survivors because of SWF. Without that hard carry 99.9% of the people would never make it past 5.
I'm talking about skills, not about ranks.
You statement is false though.Sorry that was a misquote. I corrected it. It was for Crusader.
-
I'm talking about skills, not about ranks.@Tucking_Friggered said:@The_Crusader said:
The thing is, everybody knows that if a killer seems really bad, they're definitely going to have NOED.Likewise if you go against a killer that'd playing well, theres a chance they won't have it.
The fact that this stays true to high rank proves that it's carrying some killers. Its there to make sure every killer can climb the ranks and feel good. You can use skill or the devs can hold your hand.
Why bother putting in the effort to win the hard way when you can just throw on NOED, Remember Me and Bloodwarden and cheese the ending?
The more you talk the more amusing you become. Everyone knows there are only high ranked survivors because of SWF. Without that hard carry 99.9% of the people would never make it past 5.
You statement is false though. -
Yup it's a law.
It happens to me as well that whenever i got the mori daily survivors decide to run 1 or 2 party streamers most of the times. I feel so sorry for them and really hope to kill the one who didnt use BPS. -
Noed does NOT destroy solo survivors as long as they play smart. I spend half of my playtime as a solo survivor and i don't have any issue with noed because i know how to deal with that.@Nickenzie said:
@Vietfox@Vietfox said:
Tbh i'm usually drunk when playing solo as well, and still NOED is not an issue to me. Those who claim that X perk is broken it's because they want ez wins instead of looking for a way to deal with it.@Nickenzie said:
SWF aren't always a commando unit. @Vietfox plays with his friends drunk just so he can chill out, ya know?@MrsPiggyIsSoSneaky said:Also, that's another thing, for something to be fun, it needs to be balanced, you simply said just to have fun, nothing about balance.
i.e when you brought up the swf being fun and the game ONLY being fun when playing with friends.
Everyone knows i play more as a survivor than as a killer, and yet i think NOED is fine.
I'm starting to think NOED is fine, but I really don't like how the perk destroys solo survivors while SWF can take it down in a breeze. This needs to be changed, make NOED equally as strong for both groups of survivors. -
Tbh i'm usually drunk when playing solo as well, and still NOED is not an issue to me. Those who claim that X perk is broken it's because they want ez wins instead of looking for a way to deal with it.@Nickenzie said:
SWF aren't always a commando unit. @Vietfox plays with his friends drunk just so he can chill out, ya know?@MrsPiggyIsSoSneaky said:Also, that's another thing, for something to be fun, it needs to be balanced, you simply said just to have fun, nothing about balance.
i.e when you brought up the swf being fun and the game ONLY being fun when playing with friends.
Everyone knows i play more as a survivor than as a killer, and yet i think NOED is fine. -
Because they are too lazy to adapt.
-
Next time we play together tell me how you were pronouncing it lol, i'm curious.@PhantomMask20763 said:
Oh, so that's how you would pronounce your name. I had trouble pronouncing it so I just said it completly different lol@Vietfox said:Ok ok i'll tell you. I lived in Vietnam for a short period of time and loved it.
Fox because of Gray Fox, from Metal Gear Solid. I liked that character, especially when he talks ######### about politicians
I came up with this name like 15 years ago or so. -
You toxic survivor main lol 😂😂😂@OrionsFury4789 said:
I dropped a firecracker and balanced landing away and he DC immediately@Vietfox said:
I gotta disagree, as long as people DC because they missed DS or got their totem cleansed they can gtfo and uninstall DbD tbh.@HavelmomDaS1 said:Give players more motivation to not DC is the better solution imo
I bet these DCers do kinda the same when playing single player games. Save every time they can and load when things didn't go their way. -
It's not as bad as the one from Elder Scrolls Online. I was once typing "is permament" and got censored because the "s" and "perm" from the next word formed the word "sperm". Took me some time to figure out what the hell just happened.@PinkEricka said:Why do we need censorship? Isn’t this game rated M for mature? lol
-
PC till it died, PS4 now.
-
So true, use a bps and be the first one to get caught, camped and tunneled.
It's a law.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1mBHiLmD6Sw
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1Bix44C1EzY
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aSNJ00iAZ7I
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lfg0_FbIqqw
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DU_ggFovJNo