dollidahlia
dollidahlia
About
- Username
- dollidahlia
- Joined
- Visits
- 935
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Saitamfed said:
Not trying to be THAT guy but, Have you tried not 3-gen yourself? It's quite easy once you've figured the trick...
Did you know that the killer would and will target 3 gens at the beginning so you can’t do them? How exactly do you counter that
-
The community is filled with babies who want free wins.
there I said it, both sides are babies.
NOT ALL bust most
-
@gilgamer said:
maybe a killer that is fun to play would be a good start. Tbh though its pretty obvious that they need to stop focusing on new killers and focus on new ways to play the game instead. The same gen format has gotten really old and stale and there's only so many ways you can make unique killers around the gen defense mode.
I agree. In fact I believe that a lot of the older killers need reworks and some of the new ones. Maybe add a new status effect to make the current killers different from each other
-
@Pulsar said:
Ngl, I kinda hate the newer stuff.
Nurse, Hag, Ghostface and Dull Merchant all have some really bad themes imo
What did they did to ghostface chase music should be a crime. After they made his chase theme more quiet it was perfect but noooooo now it’s basic
-
Well it doesn’t seem like people want an anti-loop killer either. So idk what the killer would be
-
Yeah. I’m already over it, it’s a shame too. I love the aesthetic of the killer. Having their own little tent and the chase music/menu music is perfect. But the killer and power just doesn’t fit it..
a shame really
-
@EB4TheEye said:
I picked her up today, and I'm trying for the adept. Its been rough, so I've tried making full use of her power on Midwitch, but after losing the Adept to a dc, I got accused of intentionally exploiting???
Is this just survivors being salty or is this not how the power meant to be best used?
She excels at indoor maps but at the end of the day, it’s just an M1 killer with a tracking device
-
@Astrian said:
It's official. The Skull Merchant sucks, nobody can use the excuse that it's clickbait from influencers or that we haven't gotten our hands on her yet. She's stronger than she was on PTB and she's still bad, downright atrocious. Some of the most boring gameplay we've gotten on DBD, even more snoozer than Knight.
Eruption got easily one of the worst nerfs I've seen in any game. The perk got nerfed so hard I think Blizzard would say you guys went to far, and they're the kings of killing strong strategies. They literally made a whole sequel to Overwatch just because they couldn't balance 6v6 gameplay and I don't think they would've went this far with Eruption. The entire screaming mechanic got changed, just to further nerf Eruption.
Tome 14 is sleeper. Could be controversial, but I've seen a lot of threads of people that just don't care about the cosmetics on offer this tome. IMO it's pretty lazy and stars a killer that not a lot of people like.
Wanna see what other people think, but as someone who's taken a step away from DBD in the past few months, I don't like the quality of content that's been coming out and I hope BHVR is willing to slow down production to make sure everything that is coming out is actually ready to be released.
eruption was the biggest nerf you seen in any game??? What come on that’s a little extra. And I’m a killer main myself
-
The power is an interesting concept, but it just seems like plague and doctor together (plague doctor lol)
the perks are also interesting. They would either be super OP or super trash
-
@Piruluk said:
Hillbilly was broken, instasaw billy was the most disgusting thing ever in this game.
Deathslinger was extremely oppressive in 1 vs 1
This is a 4v1 game. Why are you bringing up 1v1? It’s like you’re grasping to justify the nerf to deathslinger
-
Tunneling and camping will always be around regardless of bonus bloodpoints you get or not.
it’s very efficient and effective to tunnel the survivor out of the match
-
@Saiph said:
Contrary to killers, who have 10+ good regression perks, survivors don't have the luxury of choice, there are only 3-4 exhaustion perks that are good. So one would expect the pick rate of any exhaustion perk to be naturally high (around 25%) just because of lack of competition.
Maybe BHVR should increase competition to Dead Hard by introducing new OP perks and Dead Hard's pickrate will magically decrease. Is that what you want?
Comparing DH and Eruption is silly as one perk requires high skill to use while the other requires exactly zero.
It’s almost like survivors have so many perks to speed up gen, including items like brand new part.
this isn’t a one sided thing. You have access to make a full load out dedicated to gen speeds
-
To create dead zones I guess. That way they could just run to the area the survivor died on and have a better chance on wiggling out
-
@kill4escape4win said:
We all know many perks are good on specific killers and bad on others but some perks seems to have specific limitations fearing they would be TOO strong on specific killer aka the nurse.
How would the perks be affected if the nurse was gone from the game? would most of them get big buffs? different effects? is the perk balance actually influenced by the nurse's existence in your opinion?
On paper, yes. Probably a lot of killers would receive buffs and perks would be buffed.
but I’m theory how would you buff other killers? Killers that have no anti-loops will always be worst than killers with anti loops. So the cycle could just keep going
-
For me, it’s not that she has no chase capability. The choice on the set up item is so BORING.
drones? Come on, we can do better than that
-
@GolbezGarlandGabrant said:
Translation: Former killer main wants easy wins.
Yup. I want easy wins, that’s why I switched to survivor. Thank you for proving my point :)
-
If that’s all you have to reply then I’m done talking to you.
maybe appreciate 1 nerf at a time instead of wanting more killers nerfed immediately. It makes you look immature
-
@jesterkind said:
https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/discussion/comment/3310962#Comment_3310962
It makes you dramatic to claim that the most overpowered killer getting a frankly pretty moderate nerf is a "might as well be a survivor main" situation, as if you specifically need Exposed on the Nurse to stand any chance, as well as to point at the only other overpowered killer and claim that trying to fix that would also be unfair.
Still, if you think you'd have more fun on survivor, by all means. I started playing some more myself, though I would definitely say finding a team is best if all you want is easy wins because you will not get them in solo queue.
1.) I couldn’t care less about the nurse nerf, it’s more annoying that after she got nerf, instead of enjoying the fact that nurse finally got nerfed, survivors would rather just skip and go to the next killer who needs nerfs
survivor mains only care about themselves. They never advocate for any of the weak killers to get buffed like trapper or pig. And instead make post about deleting killers because “I can’t loop it”
-
@jesterkind said:
I'd imagine Blight will be next, some of his addons are overtuned.
Is it not exhausting, being this dramatic?
If it makes me dramatic to switch from killer to survivor then yeah.
I love being dramatic if it means I can win easily on survivor
-
I swear. Survivors will complain about anything and everything if the killer is even able to move lol
-
Literally dead hard is right back to where it was
-
They just need to make the DC penalty more harsh tbh. It’s super easy to DC
-
@Pulsar said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3138880#Comment_3138880
Yes, if you want to go 100%, ensure nobody has fun and boost your win-rate in an unbalanced party game, tunnel someone out at 5 gens. There are times against certain players where you will need to camp and tunnel. Survivors do not have much of an ability to counter hardcore tunneling right out of the gate anymore. DS is nerfed, DH got nerfed, their ability to loop was nerfed, holding W was nerfed and nobody runs BT anymore. In 95% of matches, you don't need to tunnel. You do it because it's easy.
Likewise, whataboutism. Nobody brought up Survivors, it's completely irrelevant to this discussion.
2 hooking Survivors is the higher chance to lose. Ergo, it is more skillful if you still win.
If we are gonna pull this card. I never once mentioned skillful in my post, so that’s irrelevant. 2 hooking survivors is the WORST TATIC. If you agree then you agree
-
@Pulsar said:
It's objectively more skillful to 2 hook everyone than to tunnel someone out at 5 gens.
It's incredibly unfun for the player in question and it really isn't needed at most levels of play. People just use it as a crutch a lot of the time.
That’s hypocritical though. 2 hooking survivors is the higher chance to lose, and how is it a crutch if it doesn’t work 100% of the time? And it’s hypocritical because it’s a crutch if a killer tunnels but it’s not a crutch if survivors abuse god loops and body blocking.
not saying that tunneling is a FUN thing but it’s a VALID thing. It’s the best way to win and a smart killer would choose the best way to kill effectively
-
@ByeByeQ said:
It might be the worst strategy but if I can 2 hook everyone before killing them all I certainly feel like I had a good round where I accomplished something rather than taking the easy way out.
Shouldn’t that apply to survivors? You don’t need to escape to feel accomplished
-
@AnchorTea said:
I wish I was good with this killer. Im just not. I miss most of my blades and when I adjust the controller over extends and keeps missing. Its no wonder Trickster's facecamp because playing without a mouse feels awful.
Im sorry for the salt post. It's just so grinding.
Try the ricochet add-on. It’s a life saver for console tricksters
~ Console nurse main
-
@gilgamer said:
I disagree, it's the devs and the players(both killers and survivors) that make the game stale, don't try and play some blame game its partially every group's fault that the game has become so stale.
Everything we are given our from the devs. We can’t make something boring unless we are given the opportunity by the devs
if nurse is too stale and strong, it’s not the killers fault for playing something in the game, it would be the devs for not balancing.
-
@KolbyKolbyKolby said:
That's the worst idea you could have in the game. At some level, 1 or 2 survivors might have a better trait than others that would fit more into meta gameplay. And then you'd see no5thing but lobbies full of Megs and Adams or whoever it was. People would feel bad playing their favorites or possibly get dodged or avoided for playing just who they like because of trait association. Skins work better as it allows you to play whoever you want with your skill and perks being what matters for gameplay.
I feel like you assumed some op passive or something. That’s not what I’m talking about, I’m talking about different looks in the game
for an example make it to where when Meg vaults she actually vaults like a runner instead of like every other survivor
just stuff that’s makes you go “that’s cool”
-
You could literally see all the survivors from doing that bug
-
@Sumnox said:
I enjoy reading the constant patting each other's shoulders "she's perfect... ", "Hell yeah man isn't she" of extremely biased groups here.
Well, Nurse is undoubtedly broken and by far the most unbalanced killer of the rooster. She ignores every game mechanic, and her trade offs are very small compared. Objectively speaking, when a player is experienced enough as her, and that doesn't take nearly as much as some people like claiming, she dominates consistently, no matter the skill of the players playing against her. Sure, I can run a Nurse for a very long time if the map is decent enough, but in equal circumstances, even if they're worse of a player than I am, she can catchup and make up for mistakes in 2 blinks in a disproportionate way.
She needs to have a more punishing exhaustion after missing her power, her blinks need a longer cooldown in between, and her broken addons need to be completely reworked. I'm fine with a killer being very strong if the player is very good. I'm not fine however with playing a game in which my input doesn't matter, and I just have to pray for RNG to help me. "Maybe she makes a mistake, maybe I'm lucky with the map, hopefully she's bad...". That's bad design. That's boring. I don't want pitty or luck to help me out of a situation, I want to play a game, not a spinning wheel.
There’s no counter because you keep doing the same thing to nurse which doesn’t work. Using jungle gyms/pallets are obviously not going to work.
being unpredictable destroys a nurse, but of course the bias survivor main who clings to “meta perks” calls nurse OP
-
@anonym44 said:
is a nice perk and all but it isnt that powerfull against basic attacks
get very close to the survivor, wait till they use dead hard, hit them
very easy to counter
is quite powerfull towards the nurse though & towards hillbillys chainsaw
& with other killers
but with basic attacks is not that powerfull
is still nice but it isnt that powerfull against basic attacks
I’m gonna take the bait on this one.
dead hard is beyond OP if used correctly which is 90% of the time. Dead Harding to a safe pallet or window can extend the chase for waaaaaayyyy too long even though the survivor messed up
-
@Bladeisbest said:
I wish he was bi. Would've been a bit more interesting imo.
Why?
-
@thrawn3054 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2924325#Comment_2924325
Aside from the people against it because they're homophobic, which I'm sure is a higher number then we'd like to believe. You have people like me who felt like it was just retconned to check a box. I'd have preferred a new character who was lbgt from the start. I dunno, it just feels like the whole thing could have been done better.
Making a new character and then making them gay would just make their whole personality gay.
david being gay is normal, because it shows even if you’re full on masculine you can still be gay.
-
@Mewishis said:
Am I the only one here confused about why people are complaining and complaining about complaining this much. Like my reaction was like oh David is gay in his lore neat. Then I see this dumpster fire, I'm so confused.
It was the same thing when soldier 76 was revealed gay on overwatch
-
@Pike said:
I liked playing David because I could relate to him as an athletic, straight, white male. I have invested millions upon millions of bps into David and probably bought an outfit or two. I can't exactly remember if I've spent Auric Cells on him because I have around 2k hours over the course of 2-3 years and have all survivors, killers, and many cosmetics. I haven't played in around 4-5 months or so but always left the game installed open to the possibility of playing again if the game was ever balanced.
Anyway, I did think it might be nice to see the new Haddonfield revamp and Legion rework. However, today I learned that David King's backstory has been retconned for no obvious reason. I'm not gay and can't relate to him. I'm not sure why the decision was made to retcon a character that people like myself can relate to and have invest tons of time and resources into but none the less I want all the BPs and potentially any ACs I have invested in him refunded so that I can funnel them into a character that I can relate to. Instead of creating a new character that the gay community can relate to, your company decided that my personal preference (not to mention in game time investment) is not as important as someone else's with a different preference.
So, can we get refunds to spend on characters we can relate to? Its very important to many people to have relatable characters in videogames, movies, books, music, ect. If that is going to be taken from one group of people and given to another, thats fine, but I want my investment back. I can only imagine how terrible the gay community would feel if BHVR created a gay survivor they could get behind only to turn around sometime later and announce that survivor to now all of a sudden be straight.
As someone who’s part of the LGBTQ community, I would not care if a gay character was made straight. He’s still gonna die
-
End game collapse makes her traps useless
-
@AngyKiller said:
Pets? Really?
I'm sorry but that's as bad as 'Add dance emotes'; It just ruins what little atmosphere remains. Let's have small dogs or cats or dragons or ferrets following Survivors around. That in no way completely throws what little horror atmosphere remains into the junk bin.
This game was never horror to begin with. The only time I get scared is when I’m playing killer and I’m randomly pallet stunned
-
@Johnny_XMan said:
They are never going to flat out remove a map.
But they are gonna flat out remove a killer? About time, start preaching that saying “remove “killer”” isn’t gonna work just like maps
-
@Rooftopper said:
The Title™
Indoor maps + Swamp
-
@Shaped said:
I made similar thread or two before I think (long time ago) but it crossed my mind again.
For me when it comes to killers Billy still takes the cake. He looks so funny and goofy in some outfits. Him bumping into objects with chainsaw looks like it came straight from a cartoon.
Hag m1 animation and voice Huntress makes during m1, also hilarious.
Nemesis and Bubba have funny moving animations to me.
Clown's voice sounds funny and sad at the same time so I'm conflicted about that.
Honorable mention, Gf but only because community made him a joke just like they did to bubba.
When it comes to survivors, Claudette is still the funniest to me because a lot of toxic people played her back in the day. Whenever I hear her voice it makes me laugh and I doubt I will ever be able to see her in a different light.
Ash has goofy voice so he is kinda funny.
That is about it because I don't find survivors that hilarious compared to killers. When it comes to actions players do, that is a different story tho.
What about you guys?
Why does most of the male survivors moan when running?
-
@MigrantTheGreat said:
Yeah imma say it right now!
Your essentially complaining about the things that makes nurse a threat and I doubt you know this because you don't play Nurse!
Asking for Nurse nerfs is playing with fire while dealing with a double edged sword.
1. Nobody seems to understand that when strong killers get reworked they get gutted. Billy, Freddy, and Spirit for examples
2. Nerfing Nurse could potentially be the straw that breaks the camel's back because she's the only killer left carrying the community
3. Nerfing Nurse will be taking away from the variety pool. In otherwords, Blight will be the only killer seen at high levels
Be careful what you wish for, I suggest you get good with Nurse, get to high level MMR and try to understand why these add-ons are used before complaining.
I hope you weren’t talking to me. I’m a console nurse and I have been playing her since the pig came out. I’m not asking for her to get nerfed I’m saying IF we DO nerf her then you can only nerf her addons otherwise she would be bad
-
@SleepyWillo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2909177#Comment_2909177
"I have X problem. I know Y is solution but I don't wanna. so instead let me complain. and you can't say to use the large number of counters because.... REASONS!"
“I can’t play against nurse. I know being unpredictable is the solution but I don’t wanna. So instead let me complain. And you can’t say to use the large number of counters because….REASONS!”
-
@VIle said:
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/6UAH8OOBY6PH/image.png
I can't even have a polite conversation on this game anymore without half of it being #####ing out. Whats worse is not knowing what these 'hot words' are to avoid them so when you do try and have a civil or kind conversation it just looks like you're being mean and salty because half the text is blocked.
WHY?! this game is (supposedly) for 18+ mature players. So Why block so many words that arent even offensive? And even if they are 'offensive' what about CONTEXT?
If I want to THANK a killer for NOT tunneling or camping or any other crap types of behavior I can't because it gets #######ing out. So I look like a prick for saying "Hey man thanks for not #### me and my team mates really ######### it. Thanks for #####. ####."
Why are we toning down an adult game as if it were to be played by kids?
Simple every day words too, not just the big swears and racial slurs. Which, BTW racial slurs come through ALL THE TIME. But Camper? Tunneling? SEDUCE?!?!? The legal Male name of DICK? All banned all ######.
Make it make sense.
I see more kids than adults on this game for some reason. Kinda like GTA 5
-
-
@Johnny_XMan said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2907115#Comment_2907115
Literally nobody has ever said that killers are bots and they don’t deserve to have fun. Thanks for continuing to add to the stigma these forums already have about it being a cesspool for crying killer main players.
Having fun doesn’t mean generators aren't being completed. I play killer and I often win with 1 gen left. Should I start complaining that everyone is dead at 1 gen and not 5?
It’s very rare that an instance like the one described in OP happens unless you are overcomitting to your first chase and get bad map RNG. It happens, but when it does you have to look at the whole spectrum of things taking place. One of them being your own skill or lack there of. Map and perks play a part in it as well.
You could literally say the same about nurse. It’s rare to have a good nurse yet everyone wants her nerfed. It’s not the crybaby killers it’s the entitled survivors
-
@ItzZane_ said:
I sorta disagree. Dead hard only needs a rework, Iron will is fine atm. The boons, well, My only problem with them is that you can use them multiple times & you can choose which totem you bless. It needs a cooldown and/or Have it randomly on a totem.
There’s literally no counter. No scratch marks, no noise. There’s literally nothing the killer can do but guess
-
This post flopped so hard lol not BHVR coming in saying OP is wrong
-
@Munqaxus said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2901717#Comment_2901717
All killers are getting slight above a 50% kill rate, because of MMR. So when you say solid chance of winning, you definitely mean consistently. It means Nurse is the only killer that is consistently breaking the 50% rule.
Not sure why the developers haven't reworked her yet, since more and more killer players are gravitating to her and Blight because they do break the 50% kill rate rule.
Going by that logic her killrate is under 50%. So using YOUR EVIDENCE she’s not good.
this is why we don’t balance to newer players
-
@AngyKiller said:
They goal is to kill. That is how they win. They don't win by chasing.
They don’t win by killing either. You can still depip if you kill 3 people
-
@eaebree said:
Perk works perfectly fine for me xd
Why are you mad?
