Seanzu
Seanzu
About
- Username
- Seanzu
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,629
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Sn0wJob said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Sn0wJob said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Sn0wJob said:
@SenzuDuck said:
SWF Is at every rank.
Just like "sweaty" killers are every rank.Your post proves nothing.
The good swf derank to green/blue, please don't lie to people.
I think by blue you mean purple, colour blind?
Even then, you're talking about deranking way past that to yellow, and trying to compare it to what they do, the streamers that I've seen derank go to rank 8 from what I've seen but nothing below.
Sweaty players are at all ranks, stop trying to justify your reason for deranking and just admit you're a bad killer and can't handle survivors that take the time to hit rank 1.
But raaaaank doesnt matter though, remember?
No difference between raaaaaank 1 and raaank 8, but I don't wanna be raaaank 1 despite no difference between the two.Are you 8 years old?
They specifically don't derank past a certain number because then you do start hitting players that are newer to the game.
Instead of being childish why don't you actually refute my point, oh wait - you can't. You want to instead justify your reasoning to go into YELLOW ranks btw so you can bully survivors that don't even care about this whole situation.
I think there is a huge difference between deranking to rank 8 and deranking to rank 15.
I'm sorry I can't outskill 4 man DS/adrenaline with people on comms, or 4 man sabo.
It's especially funny when you do it to people who don't have your same level of relative experience, and then call them ######### or don't sympathize when they're unhappy.Also AHAHAHAHA there are people with bad skill in all hours, ppl in red ranks with 300 hrs who are subpar at this game.
I spent a whole morning qeue sniping a rank 1 3 manSWF and they didn't stand a chance outside of a killer I don't play and some bad map RNG one game.
Trust me, I can deal with rank 1 just fine.
I'm mostly just doing it because apparently people think it's ok, and plenty of fog whisperers have admitted they enjoy dicking on people via deranking or they don't admit it but if you watch their streams you'll see how disrespectful they are.I love how bad killers on the forum always come out with stuff like "4man DS/Adrenaline teams". I rarely ever see it to be honest but the 5 games out of 100 that it happens you guys base all your other matches on that.
Again, you're comparing deranking to rank 8 as the same as deranking to rank 15. Whatever helps you pretend you're good at this game man you go for it.
-
@inkedsoulz said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@inkedsoulz said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Sn0wJob said:
@SenzuDuck said:
SWF Is at every rank.
Just like "sweaty" killers are every rank.Your post proves nothing.
The good swf derank to green/blue, please don't lie to people.
I think by blue you mean purple, colour blind?
Even then, you're talking about deranking way past that to yellow, and trying to compare it to what they do, the streamers that I've seen derank go to rank 8 from what I've seen but nothing below.
Sweaty players are at all ranks, stop trying to justify your reason for deranking and just admit you're a bad killer and can't handle survivors that take the time to hit rank 1.
**Sweaty players are at all ranks, stop trying to justify your reason for deranking and just admit you're a bad killer and can't handle survivors that take the time to hit rank 1.
**Why don't you tell that to all those streamers that derank?
Are those streamers in here?
What does me telling them have to do with this conversation? Other than the fact you can't refute my point and are just trying to deflect it instead.
I completely agree with you in your opinion about deranking, i was not trying to refute it.
I just see soo many of those streamers deranking, and then giving a plethora of reasons of why they do it in order to justify themselves...
And liked the way you put that:Sweaty players are at all ranks, stop trying to justify your reason for deranking and just admit you're a bad killer/survivor and can't handle survivors/killers that take the time to hit rank 1.
I added some to your statement so it goes both ways
While I appreciate your honesty, this is a post specifically about a killer trying to justify deranking to rank 15. Which is why I used killer in the position and not survivor.
-
@Sn0wJob said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Sn0wJob said:
@SenzuDuck said:
SWF Is at every rank.
Just like "sweaty" killers are every rank.Your post proves nothing.
The good swf derank to green/blue, please don't lie to people.
I think by blue you mean purple, colour blind?
Even then, you're talking about deranking way past that to yellow, and trying to compare it to what they do, the streamers that I've seen derank go to rank 8 from what I've seen but nothing below.
Sweaty players are at all ranks, stop trying to justify your reason for deranking and just admit you're a bad killer and can't handle survivors that take the time to hit rank 1.
But raaaaank doesnt matter though, remember?
No difference between raaaaaank 1 and raaank 8, but I don't wanna be raaaank 1 despite no difference between the two.Are you 8 years old?
They specifically don't derank past a certain number because then you do start hitting players that are newer to the game.
Instead of being childish why don't you actually refute my point, oh wait - you can't. You want to instead justify your reasoning to go into YELLOW ranks btw so you can bully survivors that don't even care about this whole situation.
I think there is a huge difference between deranking to rank 8 and deranking to rank 15.
-
@inkedsoulz said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Sn0wJob said:
@SenzuDuck said:
SWF Is at every rank.
Just like "sweaty" killers are every rank.Your post proves nothing.
The good swf derank to green/blue, please don't lie to people.
I think by blue you mean purple, colour blind?
Even then, you're talking about deranking way past that to yellow, and trying to compare it to what they do, the streamers that I've seen derank go to rank 8 from what I've seen but nothing below.
Sweaty players are at all ranks, stop trying to justify your reason for deranking and just admit you're a bad killer and can't handle survivors that take the time to hit rank 1.
**Sweaty players are at all ranks, stop trying to justify your reason for deranking and just admit you're a bad killer and can't handle survivors that take the time to hit rank 1.
**Why don't you tell that to all those streamers that derank?
Are those streamers in here?
What does me telling them have to do with this conversation? Other than the fact you can't refute my point and are just trying to deflect it instead.
-
@Sn0wJob said:
@SenzuDuck said:
SWF Is at every rank.
Just like "sweaty" killers are every rank.Your post proves nothing.
The good swf derank to green/blue, please don't lie to people.
I think by blue you mean purple, colour blind?
Even then, you're talking about deranking way past that to yellow, and trying to compare it to what they do, the streamers that I've seen derank go to rank 8 from what I've seen but nothing below.
Sweaty players are at all ranks, stop trying to justify your reason for deranking and just admit you're a bad killer and can't handle survivors that take the time to hit rank 1.
-
SWF Is at every rank.
Just like "sweaty" killers are every rank.Your post proves nothing.
-
I hate to link to my twitch but you can watch this match I used it with and see how useful it is.
-
I personally like the hook going.
Because the basement is such a plus for the killer (despite the shack loop) it's almost no risk to try the basement hooks anymore, if a killer didn't feel like they'd make it they'd just hook them on the outside and it makes the basement a no brainer to at least try if you're kind of close.
-
@AlphaJackson said:
How about we completely ignore canon and give Amanda, John's infamous cloak?Because that's illegal.
-
Was it a three man match by any chance?
-
How to deal with DS
1.Equip Rancor.
2.Down non-obsession and get hit with ds on the way to the hook
3.Ignore DS for whole match.
4.When there are 2 gens left patrol the gens and find the DS.
5.Down them.
6.Down another non obsession and get hit with DS on the way to the hook
7.Wait for other generators to finish.
8.Kill them.Honestly, there are not many things I find annoying as a killer, and matches (for me at least) with more than one DS are incredibly rare, however - when it does happen they tend to be my worst and most annoying matches ever. I'm fine with the known DS, I can eat that and prep for it, it's the 33% that ruin the match.
-
@Tsulan said:
SenzuDuck said:Decisive strike is honestly the only perk I can say that has caused me to lose a match as killer, honestly.
The first one, the one you know about it fine IMO, eat it and carry on.
It's the 33% ones that waste the most time, you're not expecting and thoroughly irritate me, it needs to go.
Ok it's official. The end is near.
I'm agreeing with senzu.
It's very rare I 2 or more d-strikes but when it does happen and they get those 33% ones it wastes so much time, it's awful.
-
Decisive strike is honestly the only perk I can say that has caused me to lose a match as killer, honestly.
The first one, the one you know about it fine IMO, eat it and carry on.
It's the 33% ones that waste the most time, you're not expecting and thoroughly irritate me, it needs to go. -
So 15 seconds sounds like the time in takes for one survivor to heal another, not the time it takes to heal yourself.
I guess you got a team that's good at healing each other, nothing wrong with that.
You could stop losing chases as well? I think if a survivor constantly jukes you enough times to be healed over and over again they're doing pretty well and probably deserve the heal.
-
@DwightsLifeMatters said:
SenzuDuck said:There's an interesting new totem spawn in the shack.
no, totem should not spawn in or outside the shack. It's the worst place cuz every survivor runs to the shack
So let me get this straight.
You want totems to
- Not spawn near survivors
- Not spawn near buildings
- Not spawn near generators
So basically, lets limit where it can spawn and actually make them easier to find, good job guys, you really are trying to kill this game.
You guys all cry about totem spawns, stop running them? You get mad when a survivor with 500+ hours find them, what do you expect? You learn the spots and they become easier to find, no totem placement will be good enough for any of you.
-
@Bbbrian2013 said:
@SadonicShadow said:
@Bbbrian2013 said:
@ScottJund said:
No, almost nobody likes the proposed changes.How would you make him strong then? He shouldn't need mix tape to be viable. Every killer should be useable man...
I dont think many people would argue against that. He should for sure be made viable and useable without addons as all killers should be. The problem with Legion is his power at its very core is the worst of both worlds. He is extremely unfair and has almost zero counterplay as survivor yet as killer he is trash tier and worse than freddy at securing kills. I agree when people say he needs to be reworked. He needs to be both fair and strong and right now he is neither. I dont have a solution but we cant simply buff and nerf our way out of this. He needs a fundamental rework. Legion is just poorly designed mechanically.
So you're saying we either get this buff or we wait a year or more for a rework...
This is Freddy all over again this buff HAS to go through then rework in a year. Don't let him be useless for a year.
No, not when you can insta down with ultra fast pallet and window jumps there's no counter.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
@SenzuDuck said:
"Just heal" a lot can happen in 40+ seconds (mending + healing).BTW @SenzuDuck this is what I was talking about earlier
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJPFaPVxuAQYea, I wasn't using the right addons, it's silly mate!
-
There's an interesting new totem spawn in the shack.
-
@Bbbrian2013 said:
@Mc_Harty said:
Yeah, I like being down in two hits with Stab Wound Study and Franks Mixtape, with no counterplay. Wait... no I don't, that was a [BAD WORD] lie.This killer needs to be reworked immediately after Freddy.
Heal then that won't happen. It'll be like he was never buffed. The purpose is to waste time so he isn't rushed so hard.
"Just heal" a lot can happen in 40+ seconds (mending + healing).
-
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@ShowMeUrBirb said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@MegChicken said:
Just a heads up, some Pig player is trapping players in the basement and is stalling the game until players leave the game.He’s done this 3 times after I blocked him, luckily I managed to recognize him and his playstyle.
There is nothign wrong with that, maybe doing an achievment or sth
yea the achievement for taking the game hostage and forcing DC? I love watching you guys justify basement blocking survivors in, my fav.
There is nothing you need to justify, its allowed behaviour and you cant be banned for that
Blocking survivors in basement untill they DC is holding the game hostage and is bannable offense.
Edit: A wordNot if there is a timer running (like the rbt)
none of this was mentioned in the post, do you always add things to arguments to make your side seem more reasonable?
I still can't believe you try and justify this play style, it's a joke, it's taking the game hostage. Stop trying to make it seem like a fair thing to do.
from the OP:
"Just a heads up, some Pig player is trapping players in the basement and is stalling the game until players leave the game. "
Oh yea - It totally mentions bear traps in that post thanks for pointing that out!
-
@Master said:
@ShowMeUrBirb said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@MegChicken said:
Just a heads up, some Pig player is trapping players in the basement and is stalling the game until players leave the game.He’s done this 3 times after I blocked him, luckily I managed to recognize him and his playstyle.
There is nothign wrong with that, maybe doing an achievment or sth
yea the achievement for taking the game hostage and forcing DC? I love watching you guys justify basement blocking survivors in, my fav.
There is nothing you need to justify, its allowed behaviour and you cant be banned for that
Blocking survivors in basement untill they DC is holding the game hostage and is bannable offense.
Edit: A wordNot if there is a timer running (like the rbt)
none of this was mentioned in the post, do you always add things to arguments to make your side seem more reasonable?
I still can't believe you try and justify this play style, it's a joke, it's taking the game hostage. Stop trying to make it seem like a fair thing to do.
-
@Master said:
@ShowMeUrBirb said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@MegChicken said:
Just a heads up, some Pig player is trapping players in the basement and is stalling the game until players leave the game.He’s done this 3 times after I blocked him, luckily I managed to recognize him and his playstyle.
There is nothign wrong with that, maybe doing an achievment or sth
yea the achievement for taking the game hostage and forcing DC? I love watching you guys justify basement blocking survivors in, my fav.
There is nothing you need to justify, its allowed behaviour and you cant be banned for that
Blocking survivors in basement untill they DC is holding the game hostage and is bannable offense.
Edit: A wordNot if there is a timer running (like the rbt)
none of this was mentioned in the post, do you always add things to arguments to make your side seem more reasonable?
I still can't believe you try and justify this play style, it's a joke, it's taking the game hostage. Stop trying to make it seem like a fair thing to do.
-
@MPGamer18 said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@fluffybunny said:
@MPGamer18 said:
@HellDescent said:
Lol. People are praising devs for removing something they should not have put in a game in a first place.Like SWF.
They put in SWF because there was a demand for it. There's many that got into DBD to play with friends and there's many that would leave if SWF was removed. It wouldn't be a good thing for the game's community to take a huge hit like that. It'd honestly be better to balance the game around SWF than to just remove it.
They actually recently came out and said SWF was always intended and wasn't added because of demand.
And i always think people who constantly complain about SWF are just bad at the game anyway, they are still kill able, just because that one survivor that looped you the entire game is in an SWF doesn't mean he wouldn't have ruined you in a solo match.
Too many bad players.
You got that backwards … people who play in groups are bad at the game. That's why they group together. Their strength is in their numbers, not their skill. It's why they ALWAYS disconnect then they are given a taste of their own medicine. They are the reason killers camp. I wasn't singling out you, but clearly I hit a nerve. Solo players are much better then SWF players.
Clearly hit a nerve? Lol, I play SWF without comms almost every day you didn't hit a nerve but I think it's boring hearing these vocal killers on the forum constantly whine about not being able to kill anyone that's in an SWF when I do it constantly when I play killer.
Too many people are bad at the game and use SWF as an excuse, I've played solo survivor and have killers TELL me I must be in an SWF or the other players must be in an SWF. It's an easy excuse for bad killers.
-
@fluffybunny said:
@MPGamer18 said:
@HellDescent said:
Lol. People are praising devs for removing something they should not have put in a game in a first place.Like SWF.
They put in SWF because there was a demand for it. There's many that got into DBD to play with friends and there's many that would leave if SWF was removed. It wouldn't be a good thing for the game's community to take a huge hit like that. It'd honestly be better to balance the game around SWF than to just remove it.
They actually recently came out and said SWF was always intended and wasn't added because of demand.
And i always think people who constantly complain about SWF are just bad at the game anyway, they are still kill able, just because that one survivor that looped you the entire game is in an SWF doesn't mean he wouldn't have ruined you in a solo match.
Too many bad players.
-
@MrChubChub said:
ive spotted the survivors moving and being more alive in the menu screen, you're not fooling anyoneIt's mentioned in the patch notes buddy.
-
Yes.
-
They are testing a new lobby system and gradually adding people too it, there's a chance you might be in it.
Basically it'll group survivors up together first and then dump them in your lobbies (might be why you're seeing 4 survivors drop all in).
-
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@MegChicken said:
Just a heads up, some Pig player is trapping players in the basement and is stalling the game until players leave the > @Morfedel said:@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@MegChicken said:
Just a heads up, some Pig player is trapping players in the basement and is stalling the game until players leave the game.He’s done this 3 times after I blocked him, luckily I managed to recognize him and his playstyle.
There is nothign wrong with that, maybe doing an achievment or sth
yea the achievement for taking the game hostage and forcing DC? I love watching you guys justify basement blocking survivors in, my fav.
blocking the basement is, but he was talking about Mori, which is just fine.
He replied to the original post, not a comment about moris, I think youve misread.
-
@Master said:
@MegChicken said:
Just a heads up, some Pig player is trapping players in the basement and is stalling the game until players leave the game.He’s done this 3 times after I blocked him, luckily I managed to recognize him and his playstyle.
There is nothign wrong with that, maybe doing an achievment or sth
yea the achievement for taking the game hostage and forcing DC? I love watching you guys justify basement blocking survivors in, my fav.
-
@Nickenzie said:
SenzuDuck said:
Nickenzie said:
SenzuDuck said:Totems NEED to spawn next to generators.
The more tiles you restrict totems spawning on, the more obvious the places that they're spawning on becomes.
The new walls that came in a few patches ago that look like this <_> but with straight edges have totems spawning in them near gens and the amount of times I've found someone trying to do a gen and haven't checked the spot is getting bigger every day.
TLDR; The more tiles you restrict, the more obvious the spawns become.
I think this might be your first bias comment but I might be wrong tho so forgive me if I am.
If totems don't spawn near generators, totem spawning locations won't be more obvious. There's enough spawning space on every map to utilize meaning totems should still be well hidden overall. Besides, I rather have a hidden totem than a generator totem where every survivor immediately knows where it's at.
Again you guys have absolutely NO idea what bias is. I’m perfectly fine with them not spawning near generators, but they will be found quicker once you start removing places that they can spawn in.
if you have 50 places a totem can spawn in, and people check those places every game that’s some decent time wasted. If you then decide that in the same map there’s only 25 places the totem can spawn that’s a lot less area to check.
its not bias, bias is being completely one sided, making one statement you don’t like isn’t biased. You guys need to stop throwing it around like you have any idea.
@SenzuDuck
Calm down and stop getting all defensive, you act like being slightly bias is bad thing when it's not a bad thing. I actually careless about you being bias, I was trying to say that your reasoning is slightly bias towards survivors."You guys need to stop throwing it around like you have any idea."
I do know what the definition of bias is dude and you don't have to tell me any different so chill out.
(Spoiler)
Now, allow me to explain how you're slightly bias towards survivors. When you said generator totems need to stay, you mentioned that it will take longer in this example you provided here.
"If you have 50 places a totem can spawn in, and people check those places every game that’s some decent time wasted. If you then decide that in the same map there’s only 25 places the totem can spawn that’s a lot less area to check."
However, here's the thing with having generator totems, SURVIVORS DON'T HAVE TO WASTE TIME SEARCHING IF THE TOTEM LOCATION IS IN PLAIN SIGHT OF A GENERATOR. This means no time is wasted when searching for totems. I'd rather have the survivor get 25 places to search than winning the lottery on not getting a generator totem on 50 places. That is why your statement is slightly (not completely) bias.
Near is a very vague word, I'm thinking of a 5 metre radius around the gen, not ones that are literally ontop of it, because not all totems that are near gens are in plain sight, this is my point.
infact, the post even mentions a radius around the gens, that then becomes a pretty large area on the map that totems CANT spawn in.
-
Again you guys have absolutely NO idea what bias is. I’m perfectly fine with them not spawning near generators, but they will be found quicker once you start removing places that they can spawn in.Nickenzie said:
I think this might be your first bias comment but I might be wrong tho so forgive me if I am.SenzuDuck said:Totems NEED to spawn next to generators.
The more tiles you restrict totems spawning on, the more obvious the places that they're spawning on becomes.
The new walls that came in a few patches ago that look like this <_> but with straight edges have totems spawning in them near gens and the amount of times I've found someone trying to do a gen and haven't checked the spot is getting bigger every day.
TLDR; The more tiles you restrict, the more obvious the spawns become.
If totems don't spawn near generators, totem spawning locations won't be more obvious. There's enough spawning space on every map to utilize meaning totems should still be well hidden overall. Besides, I rather have a hidden totem than a generator totem where every survivor immediately knows where it's at.
if you have 50 places a totem can spawn in, and people check those places every game that’s some decent time wasted. If you then decide that in the same map there’s only 25 places the totem can spawn that’s a lot less area to check.
its not bias, bias is being completely one sided, making one statement you don’t like isn’t biased. You guys need to stop throwing it around like you have any idea. -
Stop telling people how to play.
-
I don't know why you've bookmarked his account to test bans.
Its possible it'll be his first time which will make it a temp in game ban, and it wont show on his profile, it'll have to be a certain amount of bans for it to be a full game ban. =/
-
@DwightsLifeMatters said:
SenzuDuck said:@DwightsLifeMatters said:
NightmareReborn said:
The reason why ruin is a totem is because it would be too devastating if it wasn't. New players have a harder time dealing with the ruin skillchecks and good players can just power through it. However, I do agree that Huntress' lullaby shouldn't be a totem. It has way too small of an impact for it to be a totem.
But why are we balancing around newbies?
"Why should new players even have a chance omegalul"
Oh look, the survivor main who plays killer casually is hunting in the forum again "omegalul"
Or alternatively, I'm a better killer than you'll ever be and want balance to the game and think new players should be able to learn and have a fighting chance against killers.
But oh no, mr dwightslifematters thinks every survivor should suffer from rank 20 to rank 1.
I find it funny how you mention I play this game as a killer casually. It's a casual game, for casuals. If it was competitive you're damned sure insta heals and moris would never be a thing. The game is casual, stop tryig to use it as an insult.
I think it's very evident who wants the game to sustain a long life and be balanced, and it certainly isn't you.
OMEGALUL - make new players suffer because you've had a hard time 200 hours in and think you're owed all the kills from rank 20 to rank 1.
-
@DwightsLifeMatters said:
NightmareReborn said:The reason why ruin is a totem is because it would be too devastating if it wasn't. New players have a harder time dealing with the ruin skillchecks and good players can just power through it.
However, I do agree that Huntress' lullaby shouldn't be a totem. It has way too small of an impact for it to be a totem.
But why are we balancing around newbies?
"Why should new players even have a chance omegalul"
-
Or they're not allowed to talk about it while they're in negotiations?
-
Totems NEED to spawn next to generators.
The more tiles you restrict totems spawning on, the more obvious the places that they're spawning on becomes.
The new walls that came in a few patches ago that look like this <_> but with straight edges have totems spawning in them near gens and the amount of times I've found someone trying to do a gen and haven't checked the spot is getting bigger every day.
TLDR; The more tiles you restrict, the more obvious the spawns become.
-
@Dokta_Carter said:
SenzuDuck said:@powerbats said:
@Vortexas said:
Mad cause your connection tapped out.
I don't think that's what it is since I've had video of people doing it and 2 were so mad they couldn't win they did it to the point they disconnected themselves.
Lag switchers don't exist btw.
If it's our internet connection how is my beautiful face still streaming?
4Head
If those dont count as lag switches happening. Then what the heck is a lagswitch
Exactly.
People who are actually biased will defend killers to their death and say the lag is a survivors fault.
I have clips that show survivors speed hacking but you can see their names so wont be posting those, I've not had a speed hacking survivor in a while though, but as you can see those clips were within the last 30 days.
Dedicated servers can't come soon enough.
-
@powerbats said:
@Vortexas said:
Mad cause your connection tapped out.I don't think that's what it is since I've had video of people doing it and 2 were so mad they couldn't win they did it to the point they disconnected themselves.
https://clips.twitch.tv/AlivePluckyGalagoMau5
https://clips.twitch.tv/GrotesqueGoldenAdminRaccAttack
https://clips.twitch.tv/BadFlaccidMangetoutCharlieBitMe
Lag switchers don't exist btw.
If it's our internet connection how is my beautiful face still streaming?
4Head
-
@powerbats said:
@Master said:
Not really tbh.
Make an example why it should be so terrifyingBBQ/Tinkerer/Bitter Murmur/Rancor/Sloppy Butcher/Nurses Calling/Stridor/Iron Maiden you could swap one or 2 perks out but the same is still true.
@Powerbats, don't you see? Only survivors can have overpowered builds, tut. You should know this by now.
-
Just because their is more diversity doesn't mean you should be able to pick more.
Make builds that compliment each other, not whack every perk under the sun in, it would make the game incredibly tedious to play.
-
Nice, a thread I can get behind.
New game mode would be interesting, not massively in favour of it as some things ruin lobby queues anyway but we'll see if they can pull it off.
Hopefully at the end of March the last DLC for this road map will be released and I hope they take a month to design more maps to introduce for places like Lerys/Estate/Crotus so you aren't guarenteed certain maps with offerings.
And I'd love map specific basements, would be hot as ######### on lerys to have the basement as a morgue.
The other things on your list are neither here or there for me, they aren't things I would oppose but also things I don't care much about.
Hope 2019 brings you all your kills ;D
-
"Insert thread from killer mains that want to kill the game"
-
@Dead_by_David said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Vietfox said:
scorpio said:You are probably the most annoying "killer main" on this forum.
Keep up the good work @SenzuDuck lol, i'm even jealous
I don't get why people think being a main is offensive, even though I'm neither. 2500+ hours in this game I've probably played both sides more than they ever will OMEGALUL
Bit off topic but what is OMEGALUL?
It's an emote off twitch, or more precisely it's an emote for an extension of twitch BTTV
-
@Dokta_Carter said:
SenzuDuck said:@MegaWaffle said:
@SenzuDuck said:
Dear OP,
Both sides are toxic, that is all.
You take that back you salty Forum Main!!!
Just the usual "Senzu being biased" post, don't mind me.
Yeaah
I dont really ever see you being biased. Moat times you vote for the game to stay as is, with a few minor fixes(then again this is just what i see when i see your comments on fourm)I think maps are the biggest problem honestly, crotus prenn being one of the best loops for survivors in a long time has never seen a change and it needs one.
It's people that want everything buffed under the sun is what annoys me, and I'm biased for not wanting all these changes, or biased for not defending an 8 minute basement body block.
-
@MegaWaffle said:
@SenzuDuck said:
Dear OP,Both sides are toxic, that is all.
You take that back you salty Forum Main!!!
Just the usual "Senzu being biased" post, don't mind me.
-
Yea - Their biggest complaint from beta was always open mics, which you can now turn off. Funny that.BACKSTABBER said:@SenzuDuck said:
@BACKSTABBER said:
@Oooooof said:
Just don't think about if the survivors is swf or not.best balance is providing voice chat without the mute option between all players including the killer
-> so you can blame em all to discharge your frustration for their toxicity (survs will voice chat anyways)
At this points I'm pretty sure killer mains like yourself are just trying to request things that'll kill the game.
no way, expressed toxicity is a must-to trends, just look last year: the nightmare
-
@BACKSTABBER said:
@Oooooof said:
Just don't think about if the survivors is swf or not.best balance is providing voice chat without the mute option between all players including the killer
-> so you can blame em all to discharge your frustration for their toxicity (survs will voice chat anyways)
At this points I'm pretty sure killer mains like yourself are just trying to request things that'll kill the game.
-
Bye ^_^
Enjoy Civ 5
-
@yeet said:
@SenzuDuck said:
and in all 318 of your discussions not one of them is to report this bug in the correct section."fix this thing no one is reporting".
It's clearly a bug if this is happening, I've personally never seen it happen or seen anyone else mention it - try reporting it instead of posting something in "General Discussions".
it happens after a survivor unhooks themselves, it's like they adjusted the animation to be shorter but didn't shorten the i-frames, so the survivor has invincibility for about a second and a half longer
My point still stands, people need to report this.
The original post states that they're running "20 - 30 metres" while being invincible.