Avatar

Seanzu

Seanzu

About

Username
Seanzu
Joined
Visits
4,629
Last Active

Comments

  • Milord said:
    SenzuDuck said:
    How do you accidentally do it, lmao?

    every video I’ve seen of the exploit has had the person try it multiple times before making it work. It’s very unlikely you did it by mistake and you’re just making this post to create evidence that it was an “accident”.

    you cheated, deal with it.
    se05239 said:

    You don't accidentally pull off exploits that prestige your characters.

    OP never said he did it accidentally. He just said he didn't know it's bannable
    So the post even more idiotic “I cheated and didn’t know their would be consequences”.

    my mistake though I didn’t think people can be that stupid and simply assumed he meant accidentally.
  • How do you accidentally do it, lmao?

    every video I’ve seen of the exploit has had the person try it multiple times before making it work. It’s very unlikely you did it by mistake and you’re just making this post to create evidence that it was an “accident”.

    you cheated, deal with it.
  • Reporting in game saves a log - you only need to report in game for chat offenses.

    HARASSMENT: COMMUNICATIONS ABUSE
    Insults, intimidation, hateful speech, repeated harassment
    In-game report REQUIRED

    If you think you need to supply additional information you can do so here:

    https://support.deadbydaylight.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

    On this page the drop-down menu "Additional Player Report Information"

  • @DwightsLifeMatters said:
    Delfador said:

    @DwightsLifeMatters said:

    Yep, it would be the easiest and next logical step after improving hiding spots. I mean, it's not that much coding to add a requirement like NOED has for all other hex totems. But from my experience that's not gonna happen soon

    IKR?

    There have been great ideas to balance the game, to make the game less frustrating and more fun, to solve a couple of broken mechanics and all of them are forgotten right now.

    I kinda understand it, what we are discussing here doesn't mean much. With all honesty, most people waste their time with these suggestions that will never take place in the game(I am not saying that they should stop though). Survivors not being able to see killers' perks after they die came after 3 years.

    Devs are not to be blamed though. We did this. People are even against DC BBQ stacks or buffing WGLF, imagine whining and bitching if they tried radical changes that would actually impact the gameplay.

    Oh man the I saw the live stream and they actually made jokes about themselves that it took so long with hiding the killer perks. I was sitting there with my mouth open "######### are you seriously laughing about that?"

    You are referring to this https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/41728/dc-bbq-wglf-stack#latest right? Yeah, some people in this community are... Lets call them special.

    Both Killer & Survivors deserve max points for DCs anyway.

    If a survivor DCs give the killer the max points + emblems that one 3x Hooked survivor should give + a stack on BBQ

    and if a killer DCs give every survivor max points + any stacks of WGLF if they're running it.

    Too many people are punished for DCs and while I've seen people banned for DCing it doesn't help the players that are affected in game by the DC.

  • @Peanits said:

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @Peanits said:
    I would love to see some cross platform progression. One of the reasons I don't play on PS4 so much is because all my progress is on PC, and it feels weird going back to having almost nothing. It would be neat if I could jump between platforms whenever I want and have all the progress shared, and it would also be pretty nice for people who decide to switch to another platform later on (e.g. switching from consoles to PC so you can play PTBs).

    Dedicated servers would only make this even more possible... right?

    I believe this would already be possible since save files are already stored in the backend, so servers are not the limiting factor. I think the bigger issue is creating a system that would allow you to do so. You would likely need to create a "Dead by Daylight account" (something that doesn't exist) to do it since you would have to log in on both platforms to link them, or have to link up all the different APIs for the different platforms so you can link your Steam account to your PSN account, for example. And then there's a whole other mess of, "Well what if my brother wants to play on the PS4 while I play on PC?" since shared progression would mean that someone's progress ain't getting saved, along with a bunch of other issues.

    There's not a whole lotta' games out there that do it and I guess I can see why. It's a ton of work to do it well. Even GTA V only let you transfer your progress from last gen platforms to a current gen platform once, and any progress you made on the current gen platform wouldn't transfer back, they remained completely separate.

    I would assume it's not a matter of whether or not it's possible but rather how do you find the time to work that in? I can dream, though.

    I think it would be worth it.

    for a game that has grown so much due to streamers it would be incredible for them to cross-platform play/save this game so the streamers can interactive with all platforms and encourage even more people to get involved.

    We'll have to see - They want the game to last 5 more years, they have time I hope! I'll keep my fingers crossed.

  • @Peanits said:
    I would love to see some cross platform progression. One of the reasons I don't play on PS4 so much is because all my progress is on PC, and it feels weird going back to having almost nothing. It would be neat if I could jump between platforms whenever I want and have all the progress shared, and it would also be pretty nice for people who decide to switch to another platform later on (e.g. switching from consoles to PC so you can play PTBs).

    Dedicated servers would only make this even more possible... right?

  • It's just bugged status icons tbh

  • @Master said:

    @SenzuDuck said:
    Everyone in here complaining about that "sub 10 seconds gen" yea, no crap it's going to be sub 10 seconds when they're all using BNPS.

    You know guys 25% x 4 = 100%

    I can't remember the last time I had 2+ BNPs in a match, let alone 4xBNPS, 4 Injured Survivors W Resilience, Running 4 Tool Boxes + Spine chill with the killer looking at them, prove thyself & this is not happening.

    You guys reacting like 4 BNPs is common, let alone all other perfect conditions for this to even happen.

    OMEGALUL

    https://www.reddit.com/r/deadbydaylight/comments/ait1nv/new_fastest_generator_repair_possible_as_of_patch/

    This also means nothing, this setup would never happen in game, give it a rest.

    Let me run iridescent head, ebony mori and pretend that's how every killer match goes, jfc.

  • @Peanits said:
    SenzuDuck said:

    @Peanits said:

    SenzuDuck said:

    @Peanits @MandyTalk
    
    Can we have clarification on this?
    
    I also have someone who has legacy (his account was created after the cut off date)
    
    Can we still report someone for hacked legacy even if we didn't manage to play a match with them but have their Steam 64ID?
    

    Yes, you can. As long as you've got a good reason to suspect they cheated, we would gladly take a look. Just keep in mind that achievements alone are not enough for us to ban them. They can be a good indicator, but there's a whole list of issues with certain achievements not going off when they should.

    The cut off date for Legacy was November 2016, right? The guys Steam achievement for creating account was "Been A Steam Member Since September 2017" would that be enough? He hasn't even had his steam account long enough to have legacy.

    It would be. At the very least we will check it if you send it in. If you've got a reason to suspect they've cheated their save file, you can report it. It's when someone's just throwing a hundred darts at the board and hoping some of them stick is when it becomes a problem.

    Done, thanks for clarifying.

  • @CornChip said:
    who cares

    It's file editing, it's a safe bet they've hacked other things in.

  • @Peanits said:
    SenzuDuck said:

    @Peanits @MandyTalk

    Can we have clarification on this?

    I also have someone who has legacy (his account was created after the cut off date)

    Can we still report someone for hacked legacy even if we didn't manage to play a match with them but have their Steam 64ID?

    Yes, you can. As long as you've got a good reason to suspect they cheated, we would gladly take a look. Just keep in mind that achievements alone are not enough for us to ban them. They can be a good indicator, but there's a whole list of issues with certain achievements not going off when they should.

    The cut off date for Legacy was November 2016, right? The guys Steam achievement for creating account was "Been A Steam Member Since September 2017" would that be enough? He hasn't even had his steam account long enough to have legacy.

  • @DwightsLifeMatters said:
    I'm surprised that people care so much about others legacy skin. I mean, it's not like that they have used speedhack or similar and destroyed your match lol

    It involves editing save files, which means they've also probably cheated any items/bp they have, which shouldn't be done imo.

  • @PiiFree said:

    @SenzuDuck said:
    Didn't realise this was "your post".

    Don't worry, few more years and you'll be an adult and get over petty video game grudges : (

    Time to learn the difference between a post and a thread then, "big" boy.

    And protip: if you want to avoid conversation with someone - replying on their posts is usually not a good way to achieve that as that's how you start a conversation :)

    Threads and posts are the same thing, what you're doing is posting a comment OMEGALUL you don't post a post.

    So not only have a taught you about the hatch mechanic, I've also taught you a new word. Maybe you should come over to my stream so I can teach you how to play killer as well?

  • @PiiFree said:

    @SenzuDuck said:
    Well, thank god you don't watch me anymore, can't stand petty people with a grudge over video games.

    Once you've learnt the mechanics then we can have a real big boy conversation

    Perfect, so I hope you won't comment on my posts ever again to avoid initiating a conversation between you and me. Thanks and have a nice day :)

    Didn't realise this was "your post".

    Don't worry, few more years and you'll be an adult and get over petty video game grudges : (

  • @PiiFree said:

    @SenzuDuck said:
    Ehh not really, you're not the first killer I've seen think only 2 gens needs to be done for hatch to spawn, it's not you're fault you don't know basic mechanics, I'm glad I could teach you.

    You're exactly the type of user I try to avoid having contact with. "You're not the first KILLER" - assuming that I'm a Killer main.

    @SenzuDuck said:
    "You know me" because you've seen 5 minutes of a stream, well done you really do know me. Imagine getting upset about being told how a mechanic works so you personally attack someone, I don't think you understand the difference, which is why you're struggling to understand how hatch works.

    I already explained to you that you started to attack me but good job trying to deny it.

    And no, I actually used to watch you quite often like one year ago (or even longer ago) back when you had 5 viewers on average. Until we faced each other and you felt the need to talk about that salty tryhard killer that happened to be a follower of yours lol :)

    Well, thank god you don't watch me anymore, can't stand petty people with a grudge over video games.

    Once you've learnt the mechanics then we can have a real big boy conversation

  • @PiiFree said:

    @SenzuDuck said:
    Your comment literally says "2 generators as 4 survivors is easy to get"

    If you manage to repair 2 generators as 4 Survivors, the last survivor has the possibility to escape through the hatch. Regardless if that last Survivor actually contributed in ANY way to that, they'll get the chance to take the hatch, so it's not always earned. It doesn't take a huge amount of brain cells to come to this conclusion with the information I gave you.

    Ehh not really, you're not the first killer I've seen think only 2 gens needs to be done for hatch to spawn, it's not you're fault you don't know basic mechanics, I'm glad I could teach you.

    I'm indeed a reasonable adult - you attacked me first by discrediting my opinionbased on an blatant assumption you made, to which I reacted in a reasonable and honest way. The difference between you and me is that I know you, but you don't know me.

    "You know me" because you've seen 5 minutes of a stream, well done you really do know me. Imagine getting upset about being told how a mechanic works so you personally attack someone, I don't think you understand the difference, which is why you're struggling to understand how hatch works.

  • @PiiFree said:

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @PiiFree said:
    A mechanic like the hatch is fine but I think the requirements for it need adjustments.

    Every survivor should have to earn the hatch, 2 generators as 4 Survivors is way too easy to get. In exchange, if the Survivor actually manages to earn the hatch, it should be a free escape with no counterplay.

    Maybe a time frame in which the last Survivor has to survive and then the hatch opens? Killer wouldn't be able to grab Survivors at that point.

    Or add bone fragments that the Survivor has to find to open the hatch. They could find the fragments at the hooks where people got sacrificed or at their corpse when they got morid / bleed out. To avoid camping those hooks / corpses, it would require one fragment less than totally available.

    This would require a somewhat skillful playstyle in the end but at the same time allows Killers to end the match before they can use the Hatch. May the better player win.

    You have no idea how the hatch works, clearly. You should not be commenting on this.

    Hatch SPAWNS if gens done = Survivors+1

    So if 4 survivors are alive, all 5 gens must be done
    If 3 survivors are alive 4 gens need to be done
    If 2 survivors are alive 3 gens need to be done
    If 1 survivor is alive 2 gens have to be done.

    Can you at least learn basic mechanics before saying "survivors have to earn it" LUL.

    You're one big embarrassment, you didn't even read my post nor the actual OP.

    If you read OP you'd have realized that they're talking about the 4th survivors free escape, which always requires 2 gens to get. I'm not stupid, I know how the hatch works but the actual hatch spawn mechanics are totally irrelevant to my post.

    Well done looking like a fool, as if doing that live on stream wasn't enough ;)

    Your comment literally says "2 generators as 4 survivors is easy to get"

    I like how you have to personally attack my streams, clearly shows you're a reasonable adult.

    If you only get 2 gens done, and the killer manages to kill 3 people AND you stay alive during that onslaught, it isn't really a "free" escape.

  • @PiiFree said:
    A mechanic like the hatch is fine but I think the requirements for it need adjustments.

    Every survivor should have to earn the hatch, 2 generators as 4 Survivors is way too easy to get. In exchange, if the Survivor actually manages to earn the hatch, it should be a free escape with no counterplay.

    Maybe a time frame in which the last Survivor has to survive and then the hatch opens? Killer wouldn't be able to grab Survivors at that point.

    Or add bone fragments that the Survivor has to find to open the hatch. They could find the fragments at the hooks where people got sacrificed or at their corpse when they got morid / bleed out. To avoid camping those hooks / corpses, it would require one fragment less than totally available.

    This would require a somewhat skillful playstyle in the end but at the same time allows Killers to end the match before they can use the Hatch. May the better player win.

    You have no idea how the hatch works, clearly. You should not be commenting on this.

    Hatch SPAWNS if gens done = Survivors+1

    So if 4 survivors are alive, all 5 gens must be done
    If 3 survivors are alive 4 gens need to be done
    If 2 survivors are alive 3 gens need to be done
    If 1 survivor is alive 2 gens have to be done.

    Can you at least learn basic mechanics before saying "survivors have to earn it" LUL.

  • Complains that survivors don't earn the hatch.

    Thinks that the 4th kill should just be handed to him.

    Hmmm... something seems off here.

  • Awh, he's showing us his first 4K!

    Well done kiddo.

  • @Peanits @MandyTalk

    Can we have clarification on this?

    I also have someone who has legacy (his account was created after the cut off date)

    Can we still report someone for hacked legacy even if we didn't manage to play a match with them but have their Steam 64ID?

  • @weirdkid5 said:
    I'm fine with this, if you fix junk like this then fix Mori's and stuff like that. There's too many outliers in this game for it to ever be properly balanced.

    And I'm not moving any goalpost, it's not like this isn't nearly just as effective with 3 people, having 1 guy distract the Killer. It's already common knowledge that looping is the best way to waste time, and a Killer who drops his chase realistically isn't doing himself any favors, as he just wastes more time and lets the Survivor he's chasing heal. Even with 3 people, you'd maybe lose 5 seconds or so? It's completely negligible.

    Like I said, just because someone got some good perks or good addons from the RNG bloodweb doesn't mean that they should be allowed to do the things that are possible. This includes Killer Mori's and such.

    I would hardly call this anywhere close to being an outlier.

    BNPs are rare on the bloodweb and are a one use item only, they only do 25% of a gen. I would have agreed with you before the nerf but they're simply too rare in matches to even consider in my opinion.

    while I don't use BNPs because I don't like them, I don't think balancing the game around an occurrence this rare is ridiculous.

  • Report them in game so there is a match ID.

    Then from the drop down on this site

    https://support.deadbydaylight.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

    Select "Additional Player Report Information".

  • @weirdkid5 said:

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @weirdkid5 said:

    @SenzuDuck said:
    Everyone in here complaining about that "sub 10 seconds gen" yea, no crap it's going to be sub 10 seconds when they're all using BNPS.

    You know guys 25% x 4 = 100%

    I can't remember the last time I had 2+ BNPs in a match, let alone 4xBNPS, 4 Injured Survivors W Resilience, Running 4 Tool Boxes + Spine chill with the killer looking at them, prove thyself & this is not happening.

    You guys reacting like 4 BNPs is common, let alone all other perfect conditions for this to even happen.

    OMEGALUL

    What is essentially a free objective shouldn't exist at all, regardless of how common 4 BNPs are or not. You have to balance around extreme outliers, not ignore them. That's how ######### gets abused.

    No you don't, because I guarantee a setup like this has NEVER happened in a live match.

    I mean, just because you never seen it happen doesn't mean it doesn't actually happen.

    I had a guy on here explain how he and his buddy have a strat to always get off the last dude on the hook as long as BT and Adrenaline are in play, and as long as the last gen is done on time, the Killer will not be able to rehook the last guy or hook his savior.

    I've played this game since Day 1 and I can promise you I've seen 4 BNPs before, and this was back when BNPs were INSTANT repairs.

    When people realize the potential of what they can do, they'll start doing it. I have over 50 BNPs. It's not like I'm strapping for them.

    why do ya'll move the goal post so much, we're talking about the exact setup in the video, not "4 BNPS". Of course that happens but I've not seen it since BNPs were nerfed and I certainly haven't had a gen pop instantly like they used too.

    The setup in the video simply can't happen unless you're an incredibly bad player, sure 4 bnps, maybe but if all survivors are in one place you're probably going to find them very quickly and aren't likely to get them finished either way.

    I honestly can't remember the last time 4 bnps have graced my match, I also can't remember the last time I've seen any youtuber or twitch streamer go against it either.

    But like you said in your first comment, lets balance around extreme outliers, so lets balance around ebony mori, iridescent hatchets & infantry belt... you know, because it COULD happen.

  • @weirdkid5 said:

    @SenzuDuck said:
    Everyone in here complaining about that "sub 10 seconds gen" yea, no crap it's going to be sub 10 seconds when they're all using BNPS.

    You know guys 25% x 4 = 100%

    I can't remember the last time I had 2+ BNPs in a match, let alone 4xBNPS, 4 Injured Survivors W Resilience, Running 4 Tool Boxes + Spine chill with the killer looking at them, prove thyself & this is not happening.

    You guys reacting like 4 BNPs is common, let alone all other perfect conditions for this to even happen.

    OMEGALUL

    What is essentially a free objective shouldn't exist at all, regardless of how common 4 BNPs are or not. You have to balance around extreme outliers, not ignore them. That's how ######### gets abused.

    No you don't, because I guarantee a setup like this has NEVER happened in a live match.

    People aren't crying about the game being balanced around the chance of an ebony, are they? They're more likely to happen than this setup ever will, right?

  • Everyone in here complaining about that "sub 10 seconds gen" yea, no crap it's going to be sub 10 seconds when they're all using BNPS.

    You know guys 25% x 4 = 100%

    I can't remember the last time I had 2+ BNPs in a match, let alone 4xBNPS, 4 Injured Survivors W Resilience, Running 4 Tool Boxes + Spine chill with the killer looking at them, prove thyself & this is not happening.

    You guys reacting like 4 BNPs is common, let alone all other perfect conditions for this to even happen.

    OMEGALUL

  • @Master said:
    Mhm if so many killers chicken out, maybe that's because they don't feel powerful enough?

    You can just play killer on your own, ez fix 

    Why even queue up if you're going to leave because "you don't feel powerful" enough.

  • @Maelstrom10 said:

    @SenzuDuck said:
    If you want ruin, run the perk.

    Let's give survivors Distortion offerings where their auras are hidden all game, or prove thyself offerings where they all have prove thyself.

    Why are you being so sarcastic towards me? I'm sorry i offended you with my suggestion mate

    Some people LITERALLY can't play through ruin, and it'll make them useless in the game - which is why they then spend time not doing gens but searching for the totem, some times it's hard sometimes it's easy.

  • If you want ruin, run the perk.

    Let's give survivors Distortion offerings where their auras are hidden all game, or prove thyself offerings where they all have prove thyself.

  • @powerbats said:

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @Maximus7 said:
    If this is possible with two [BAD WORD] people, there's a goddamn problem: https://clips.twitch.tv/TriumphantEasyMilkJKanStyle

    Are you the guy telling the developers to kill themselves? You seem lovely!

    These are the type of people who get ignored and hopefully will be driven away from the game and realistically it's an issue with the tool boxes. It's similar to an issue they'd discovered already and they fixed 1 set of numbers but this slipped through.

    What probably happened was it got changed on their side properly but for some reason the change didn't activate client side like it was supposed to. We'll probably get a hotfix shortly or the perk will get temp disabled.

    Toolboxes are trash tbh but yea - it does seem pretty fast, hopefully they'll change it.

  • @Maximus7 said:
    If this is possible with two [BAD WORD] people, there's a goddamn problem: https://clips.twitch.tv/TriumphantEasyMilkJKanStyle

    Are you the guy telling the developers to kill themselves? You seem lovely!

    Edit: and even if you're not - it's not exactly a nice thing to say over a video game lmfao.

  • Because whether anyone likes it or not the hatch stand off is a Killer/Survivor issue.

    Making it so it's a catch-all killer only win is not fair.

    It needs completely reworked not a "Make it so survivors just win / Make it so Killers just win"

    in Hatch Comment by Seanzu
  • Imagine complaining about spam by making a spam post.

  • @vampire_toothy said:

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @vampire_toothy said:

    @Vietfox said:
    No perks no addons against survivors with instalheals and yet he got 2K. Sounds like we should nerf the nurse first :)
    Edit: in normal conditions a good nurse can get 4K in less than 4 minutes.

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @DwightsLifeMatters said:
    Vietfox said:

    No perks no addons against survivors with instalheals and yet he got 2K. Sounds like we should nerf the nurse first :)
    Edit: in normal conditions a good nurse can get 4K in less than 4 minutes.

    Only 2 kills because this ace played like an idiot. Otherwise 1 kill at best.

    Why do you guys do this

    Whenever someone does well in a match it can't because they played well, it's because a survivor did poorly.

    Dude got to rank 1 killer without addons or perks - killer is ez, you're all mad you can't reach rank 1 WITH addons and perks.

    This is the pure definition of bias, step back a bit and think more about this @Vietfox .
    The fact that you brought up that a Nurse receiving 2 kills when objectives are being done in 4 minutes (or less with toolboxes) shows you're biased. Yes, Nurse is strong but what's worse than Nurse is the fact that any person who plays optimally can complete all the generators in 4 minutes or less which in my opinion a game should never end in 5 minutes or less in the favor of the killer or the survivor in an average or even competitive-styled match. An ideal match in my books should last 7 minutes on average (there would be outlier cases with different playstyles and/or killers). What should be done first is we should see an objective change to allow for more fun objectives for survivors to interact with while waiting for the killer that can also take up more time without it just being M1 simulator, afterwords or even in the same update we can talk about nerfing Nurse or fixing the actual problem which is her addons. You need to think more objectively about the game because the problems with it isn't as black and white as you might think, there are multiple problems on both ends.

    Now for this part @SenzuDuck , you preach about rank like it ever even mattered in the first place, since when has rank meant anything? You're all talk but you can't even provide a proper reason in a discussion. I'd like to see you actually be productive in this post. Sure I can admit that it's incredibly easy to pip as a killer and as a survivor, I would know because before emblems came out I got to rank 1 as Freddy and post-emblems I got to rank 1 as perkless legion. Nearly every month I've managed to get to rank 1 as both killer and survivor but does that mean I'm a good player just because I can do that? Absolutely not because ranking up requires no skill, it only requires time and playing fairly, infact it's almost impossible to derank in a normal match. Rank has never and will never mean anything with how it currently works and how it has worked in the past. The fact you even think that rank matters in a discussion about objectives shows you're only trying to throw the discussion off.

    Oh great, another 4Head,
    I bring up rank because everyone and their mother says "shut up you don't agree with me so you're a survivor main". So i state I'm rank one every season as killer because you know, survivor mains do that.

    Nobody argues with me because they use their "you're a survivor main stop talking". Tell THOSE people to add something constructive to the conversation

    and im the one trying to throw the discussion off? Completely ignoring the guy that says "he didn't get two kills because someone played badly".

    I don't say killers only get 3 kills when they camp someone.

    Cool, lets rack up the insults while we're at it when I call for you to only be more objective. Take note that I do not care for rank or what you main as because that means nothing and calling someone a "killer" or "survivor" main only is used to divide the community rather than to be productive. Who cares if someone calls you a survivor main, that shouldn't change how you word things because at the end of the day rank and what you main do not add anything to the discussion at all and instead derails the topic. I'll call a person biased but I'll never call them a survivor or killer main nowadays and in my eyes you're biased. I haven't ignored their post either, they stayed ontopic with the video which was that they said he got 2 kills in the match because the ace played poorly, that's not off topic as it related to the video in the first place. Simply calling me a 4head means you have nothing more to say which backs up my initial post, plain and simple.

    Yea, did you read what he said? Why wouldn't I be bothered about being called that

    "Can you please stop hunting posts who are showing how busted survivors can be? U r a survivor main, you are supposed to hide and keep quite."

    He's saying I shouldn't have an opinion on things because I'm a "survivor main" but apparently your issue is with me OMEGALUL

    Too many 4Heads to comprehend.

  • @DwightsLifeMatters said:
    SenzuDuck said:

    @DwightsLifeMatters said:

    SenzuDuck said:

    @DwightsLifeMatters said:
    
    Vietfox said:
    

    No perks no addons against survivors with instalheals and yet he got 2K. Sounds like we should nerf the nurse first :)

    Edit: in normal conditions a good nurse can get 4K in less than 4 minutes.
    
    Only 2 kills because this ace played like an idiot. Otherwise 1 kill at best.
    
    
    
    Why do you guys do this
    
    Whenever someone does well in a match it can't because they played well, it's because a survivor did poorly.
    
    Dude got to rank 1 killer without addons or perks - killer is ez, you're all mad you can't reach rank 1 WITH addons and perks.
    
    
    
    Can you please stop hunting posts who are showing how busted survivors can be? U r a survivor main, you are supposed to hide and keep quite.
    
    Btw, I watched your stream some days ago. U played huntress and I was laughing my ass off. You seriously refused to break cow loop pallet and tried to bloodlust the survivor down. As Huntress. No wonder you think killer is ez. - "omegalul"
    

    Kthxbye

    oh no, you saw one of matches, FOR SHAME.

    Yea, because I don't have to try hard to do well, I don't mind [BAD WORD] around a loop while others do #########, you're bad and you'll never admit it.

    You call me a survivor main but caught me playing killer at rank one, that's weird eh?

    I can tell how upset you are it's hilarious.

    you expect from me to watch more than one match of your boring casual stream? insert here omegalul

    no, I'm not everyones cup of tea, that's the beauty of streaming, you don't have to watch it ;)

    Oh, so you admit that you verse potatoes all time but still you got the balls to come here bitching about balanced stuff against the best players? Good job, you outplayed yourself. Don't even have to try insert here another omegalul

    No, way to take it out of context, killers are strong, therefore it isn't hard to kill with them, but you can twist the words how ever you want, it wont make you any better as killer or me any worse.

    At least I can proof that you suck at playing killer with your own stream, what do you got? Right, nothing. Thanks for outplaying yourself again.

    Not really, I have plenty of matches where I 2/3/4K. You're welcome to look over my killer matches if you'd like, you saw one game where I was probably try harding throws with Huntress to see what hits. You've never proven anything, all you do is say "LOL SURVIVOR MAIN OMG GO AWAY!"

    Beeing a survivor main doesn't mean that you play exclusively survivor only. It also means that you are biased towards survivors cuz you follow the interests of survivors more than killers. And I see you very often bitching against killer posts.

    Find me a single comment from me where I ######### about a killer post OMEGALUL. It always fascinates me how you guys make up all this stuff to make it seem like what you're saying is somewhat truthful. I play more killer than survivor, I'd love to play more killer but 15 minute lobbies has been killing it for me tbh.

    When are you going to comprehend that rank doesn't mean #########? You always bring up that you are rank 1. Probably because you are just good enough to get there.

    Because survivor mains don't reach rank one, your one argument against me is "survivor main btw" to try and dismiss my opinions, if I'm a survivor main why did I hit killer rank 1 3 days after rank reset and only hit rank 1 survivor today, that's weird that.

    You'll finally realise soon that you're not very good at the game and the forums will be all the better for it instead of having you make a post every ten minutes about how not every perk holds your hand and does all the work for you.

  • @vampire_toothy said:

    @Vietfox said:
    No perks no addons against survivors with instalheals and yet he got 2K. Sounds like we should nerf the nurse first :)
    Edit: in normal conditions a good nurse can get 4K in less than 4 minutes.

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @DwightsLifeMatters said:
    Vietfox said:

    No perks no addons against survivors with instalheals and yet he got 2K. Sounds like we should nerf the nurse first :)
    Edit: in normal conditions a good nurse can get 4K in less than 4 minutes.

    Only 2 kills because this ace played like an idiot. Otherwise 1 kill at best.

    Why do you guys do this

    Whenever someone does well in a match it can't because they played well, it's because a survivor did poorly.

    Dude got to rank 1 killer without addons or perks - killer is ez, you're all mad you can't reach rank 1 WITH addons and perks.

    This is the pure definition of bias, step back a bit and think more about this @Vietfox .
    The fact that you brought up that a Nurse receiving 2 kills when objectives are being done in 4 minutes (or less with toolboxes) shows you're biased. Yes, Nurse is strong but what's worse than Nurse is the fact that any person who plays optimally can complete all the generators in 4 minutes or less which in my opinion a game should never end in 5 minutes or less in the favor of the killer or the survivor in an average or even competitive-styled match. An ideal match in my books should last 7 minutes on average (there would be outlier cases with different playstyles and/or killers). What should be done first is we should see an objective change to allow for more fun objectives for survivors to interact with while waiting for the killer that can also take up more time without it just being M1 simulator, afterwords or even in the same update we can talk about nerfing Nurse or fixing the actual problem which is her addons. You need to think more objectively about the game because the problems with it isn't as black and white as you might think, there are multiple problems on both ends.

    Now for this part @SenzuDuck , you preach about rank like it ever even mattered in the first place, since when has rank meant anything? You're all talk but you can't even provide a proper reason in a discussion. I'd like to see you actually be productive in this post. Sure I can admit that it's incredibly easy to pip as a killer and as a survivor, I would know because before emblems came out I got to rank 1 as Freddy and post-emblems I got to rank 1 as perkless legion. Nearly every month I've managed to get to rank 1 as both killer and survivor but does that mean I'm a good player just because I can do that? Absolutely not because ranking up requires no skill, it only requires time and playing fairly, infact it's almost impossible to derank in a normal match. Rank has never and will never mean anything with how it currently works and how it has worked in the past. The fact you even think that rank matters in a discussion about objectives shows you're only trying to throw the discussion off.

    Oh great, another 4Head,
    I bring up rank because everyone and their mother says "shut up you don't agree with me so you're a survivor main". So i state I'm rank one every season as killer because you know, survivor mains do that.

    Nobody argues with me because they use their "you're a survivor main stop talking". Tell THOSE people to add something constructive to the conversation

    and im the one trying to throw the discussion off? Completely ignoring the guy that says "he didn't get two kills because someone played badly".

    I don't say killers only get 3 kills when they camp someone.

  • @DwightsLifeMatters said:
    SenzuDuck said:

    @DwightsLifeMatters said:

    Vietfox said:

    No perks no addons against survivors with instalheals and yet he got 2K. Sounds like we should nerf the nurse first :)
    

    Edit: in normal conditions a good nurse can get 4K in less than 4 minutes.

    Only 2 kills because this ace played like an idiot. Otherwise 1 kill at best.

    Why do you guys do this

    Whenever someone does well in a match it can't because they played well, it's because a survivor did poorly.

    Dude got to rank 1 killer without addons or perks - killer is ez, you're all mad you can't reach rank 1 WITH addons and perks.

    Can you please stop hunting posts who are showing how busted survivors can be? U r a survivor main, you are supposed to hide and keep quite.

    Btw, I watched your stream some days ago. U played huntress and I was laughing my ass off. You seriously refused to break cow loop pallet and tried to bloodlust the survivor down. As Huntress. No wonder you think killer is ez. - "omegalul"
    Kthxbye

    oh no, you saw one of matches, FOR SHAME.

    Yea, because I don't have to try hard to do well, I don't mind ######### around a loop while others do #########, you're bad and you'll never admit it.

    You call me a survivor main but caught me playing killer at rank one, that's weird eh?

  • @DwightsLifeMatters said:
    Vietfox said:

    No perks no addons against survivors with instalheals and yet he got 2K. Sounds like we should nerf the nurse first :)
    Edit: in normal conditions a good nurse can get 4K in less than 4 minutes.

    Only 2 kills because this ace played like an idiot. Otherwise 1 kill at best.

    Why do you guys do this

    Whenever someone does well in a match it can't because they played well, it's because a survivor did poorly.

    Dude got to rank 1 killer without addons or perks - killer is ez, you're all mad you can't reach rank 1 WITH addons and perks.

  • @Daniel101773 said:
    SenzuDuck said:

    It was a bug, they stated this in their live stream.

    What’s a bug? It being in the patch notes? So it’s NOT going live and destroying the game? Oh thank god

    No the speed at which prove thy self was working, try actually reading the patch notes instead of one line and coming to the forums to post misinformation.

  • It was a bug, they stated this in their live stream.

  • I mean honestly - if I was new to a game and I wanted to check out a game and it's community, and I came here I would leave immediately.

    There's far too many people complaining about things on the forums about minor things, the community is awful, rude and negative as much as possible.

    and I'll admit, I'm awful too - I argue with people, but it's usually about my opinions, or calling out people who have said one thing and toddle over to another thread and spout something else.

    This community needs to change, it needs to get out of it's rut and work together on real issues.

    The only TRUE things plaguing this game are the map layouts (jungle jims/pallets too close/crotus prenn asylum layout).

    and I know you are all going to whine about SWF/Killer Dodging etc but they aren't really problems.

    I watch some of the greatest killers in this game play it and nearly none of them complain about SWF, they usually absolutely wreak havoc on them.

    I've had great matches as killer against SWF, and I've had terrible ones. The same goes for matches with solo squads, I've had great matches and I've had terrible matches,.

    Too many players on both side complain about things when it's simple their lack of skill in all honesty, they just wont admit it. Reminds me of that killer in another thread who is "stuck in brown ranks" while talking about how they dodge SWF, but also blamed SWF for their reason they're in, or survivors that get lucky pallets and DS and think they're god tier.

    The community is the reason people aren't sticking around ( while your graph is nonsense btw) I can see how silly moaning posts like this would put someone off continuing.

    TL;DR - Quit your moaning about silly little things that you aren't good against and focus on actual problems with the game moris/insta heals/map, pallet layouts/ Iridescent heads ETC. Most of the issues are with your playstyle over anything else.

  • @Master said:

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @Master said:

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @Paddy4583 said:
    I’d rather be dodged in lobby then load into game, and have 3 survivors DC because of ruin or they don’t like the killer... that happens way more often then a lobby dodge 

    LOL, no it doesn't.

    It certainly does in lower ranks

    Said the deranker to the rank one every season.

    No it doesn't.

    When I play survivor I almost never get lobby dodged.
    However its really common that some of my mates DC.

    I know, you only play with your low rank followers that dont DC, but the situation is a bit different when you actually play at low rank

    "You only play with your low rank followers" That's a good one when most of them are a higher survivor rank than I am, I'm currently at rank 4 survivor and rank 1 killer.

    And your comment means nothing if it's your mates DCing lmfao, they're salty players just like you.

  • @Master said:

    @SenzuDuck said:

    @Paddy4583 said:
    I’d rather be dodged in lobby then load into game, and have 3 survivors DC because of ruin or they don’t like the killer... that happens way more often then a lobby dodge 

    LOL, no it doesn't.

    It certainly does in lower ranks

    Said the deranker to the rank one every season.

    No it doesn't.

  • @Maelstrom10 said:
    XavierBoah17 said:

    No. This would make it harder for your team if your killed. Yes you gain from it but at the cost of your team losing alot of momentum.

    At the same time though, that's what happens with no mither. Don't see people complaining it should be taken out of the game due to survivors losing momentum because of it

    Because you can actually win with No Mither, you can make builds around it that makes it possible to accomplish something, being found first and downed making you instantly dead isn't something you can build around, it's basically just immersion 24/7 for anyone running the perk.

  • How many hours you at brother?

  • @KissyKissy said:
    LOL! The DBD team dont have 24 hour mod staff!!? ROFL!!!!! How much more can you say through all the Dev's actions in that you really dont care. You just dont care, guys.

    Their mods are volunteers, they are currently asking for more applicants somewhere on the forums, it's not the end of the world because there's some spam on a forum, calm down sweetheart.

  • Dodging lobbies (unless related to ping) is for bad killers anyway, they're doing you a favour and saving you from a boring match of them being a potato.

  • @Pirscher said:
    I can relate to the frustration when they lobbydodge. Sometimes its just insane and very tedious. After I open up the lobby I will sometimes within a span of 5 minutes have up to 20 survivors join and leave and join and leave! WHY!? Just play the game and stop lobbydodging!

    Yea, survivors do it too - but recently I've been getting matched with survivors from Asia/Russia a lot and their pings are always trash so I can't blame them for dodging.

    It's annoying when you have a killer/survivor with green ping and they leave, it could also be the disconnect issue, I've been kicked from some lobbies while my friends have stayed in it, very weird.

  • @Paddy4583 said:
    SenzuDuck said:

    @Paddy4583 said:

    SenzuDuck said:

    @Paddy4583 said:
    
    SenzuDuck said:
    

    @Paddy4583 said: Your experience is not a universal fact, so toddle on, I don’t wait hours for lobby’s and don’t get dodged at a 90% rate. if the game wait time was 1 hour between lobbies, and you are dodged 90% of the time, than your 2600 hours is irrelevant as only 10% of that time has been spent in game the rest is just lobby time... your numbers and facts not mine :) I never said I get dodged 90% of the time? See, you like to pull numbers out of thin air. I said I get dodged dozens of times a week, while I only have 10 - 15 DCs a week as killer, I can understand that following simple conversation is hard for some people but this is ridiculous. So toddle on, learn to follow a conversation and get back to me honey. Wow chill, why do you assume I’m speaking to you, it’s not a reply to you, it’s a reply to the OP which is where the number comes

    from,, so who’s having difficulty with this conversation?
    
    
    
    Imagine trying to act smart.
    
    You directly say "2600" hours which is the amount of hours I accidentally quoted to you in a comment but quickly removed as I didn't mean to tag you in it.
    
    Nowhere in this thread does the number 2600 show up except for the amount of hours that I removed after tagging you.
    
    paddy veri smart paddy dunt evn remebur own coment
    

    Hard to keep track of a conversation when yoir quoting so much and then editing later, like I said... sit down unravel your knickers, you won’t change my experience or win anything.

    So you first pretend you weren't talking to me, and when I prove you actually were talking to me you decide to say I'm upset? Ahaha, seems good man.

    Only thing I see is you lied to try and make me look stupid by implying the comment wasn't at me when it was, the changing and editing of my comments changes nothing, you replied to me without tagging me and then tried to pretend it wasn't a reply to me, LOOOOOOL.

    I'll say it again, paddy veri smart paddy dunt evn remebur own coment.

    No I thought the OP was the one I was talking to which is why iy Was directly linked to the OP.  
    And I told you to unbuckle your panties a few comments back too, your a very anger little person... so you need a hug

    Soooooooooooooooooooooooooo, you're still pretending you didn't mention the 2600 hours that was only mentioned by me (until I deleted it) and pretending that it was OP you were talking to?

    Im not angry, I just find it funny how people lie about things on the internet to try and make others look silly.

  • @Paddy4583 said:
    SenzuDuck said:

    @Paddy4583 said:

    SenzuDuck said:

    @Paddy4583 said:
    
    Your experience is not a universal fact, so toddle on, I don’t wait hours for lobby’s and don’t get dodged at a 90% rate.
    
    if the game wait time was 1 hour between lobbies, and you are dodged 90% of the time, than your 2600 hours is irrelevant as only 10% of that time has been spent in game the rest is just lobby time... your numbers and facts not mine :)
    
    
    
    I never said I get dodged 90% of the time? See, you like to pull numbers out of thin air. I said I get dodged dozens of times a week, while I only have 10 - 15 DCs a week as killer, I can understand that following simple conversation is hard for some people but this is ridiculous.
    
    So toddle on, learn to follow a conversation and get back to me honey.
    
    
    
    Wow chill, why do you assume I’m speaking to you, it’s not a reply to you, it’s a reply to the OP which is where the number comes
    

    from,, so who’s having difficulty with this conversation?

    Imagine trying to act smart.

    You directly say "2600" hours which is the amount of hours I accidentally quoted to you in a comment but quickly removed as I didn't mean to tag you in it.

    Nowhere in this thread does the number 2600 show up except for the amount of hours that I removed after tagging you.

    paddy veri smart paddy dunt evn remebur own coment

    Hard to keep track of a conversation when yoir quoting so much and then editing later, like I said... sit down unravel your knickers, you won’t change my experience or win anything.

    So you first pretend you weren't talking to me, and when I prove you actually were talking to me you decide to say I'm upset? Ahaha, seems good man.

    Only thing I see is you lied to try and make me look stupid by implying the comment wasn't at me when it was, the changing and editing of my comments changes nothing, you replied to me without tagging me and then tried to pretend it wasn't a reply to me, LOOOOOOL.

    I'll say it again, paddy veri smart paddy dunt evn remebur own coment.

1 … 89 90 91 92 93 … 124