Visionmaker
Visionmaker
About
- Username
- Visionmaker
- Joined
- Visits
- 862
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Outland said:
Yep a minute later they come back in and que again, where as you are out 20k in items and offerings, seems like a fair exchange.I don't bring in items anyway, so it doesn't really matter for me at all.
Boo I lost my brown BP offering. Woe is me. I've been defeated.
-
@Outland said:
@Visionmaker said:
@Master said:
@kotoalex12 said:
I was just wondering if there is any particular reason that survivors who go into a lobby with friends spawn into the lobby at the same time. It is difficult enough for my friends and I to find matches when we play together and some killers see that 2-4 of us come in at the same time and instantly back out of the lobby making us wait more time to find a match and hopefully not have the killer quit. Is it possible for devs to change the way people spawn into the lobby that way killers can't tell who is playing with friends and who isn't?Do you prefer it when the killer DCs ingame? I believe that lobby dodging is the only reason why killers basically never DC. If you wanna have a killer DC rate as high as the survivor Dc rate, go ahead
Yes. Give me that 5k survival points.
You can be sure most of the Killers will use alt f4, so no 5k for you. And no item keeping either.
No problem. Just means they can't queue again right away, so fewer dodgers for my next match.
-
Sounds fine to me, as long as survivors only need one gen to power the gates.
-
@Spiritbx said:
So what if you kobe? The killer has nothing to do but to stand there and wait for the game to end. They will just hit and hook you again.R E S P E C C
4
% -
@yeet said:
So you concede that i'm right? Thanks!I wasn't really arguing either way. You can think whatever you want.
-
@Vortexas said:
If they don't want to go against high rank killers they shouldn't partner up with High Rank survivors. It's the killers that suffer most from this sort of bullying as they are often paired with players beyond there ability at times to deal with due to sheer experience in the game.This tweak would lessen the pain of a killer having to deal with people he shouldn't even see in game.
I don't think newbies care. They want to play with their friends. It's the dev's responsibility to make sure the experience is not absolute ######### for either side.
Killers get to face 3 survivors and 1 useless bodybag that probably don't even know what a generator or skill check looks like.
Nah. Killers shouldn't get to see Ranks lower than them either.
-
@yeet said:
Visionmaker said:@yeet said:
So you agree with me that survivor perks affect other survivors therefore should be weaker than killer perks? Great!
Let me know when I can benefit off of someone else using SC.
All I know is that it robs me of altruism points.
Allows teammates to always be full health to bodyblock and make saves much easier, even if they're the only other survivor left.
Nah it sucks because they're sapping away BP and Emblem Points from me. I'd rather people not use it. :^)
-
@yeet said:
So you agree with me that survivor perks affect other survivors therefore should be weaker than killer perks? Great!Let me know when I can benefit off of someone else using SC.
All I know is that it robs me of altruism points.
-
@Aari_Piggy66 said:
brokedownpalace said:
Bug_Reporter said:@Milo said:
Sooo then how do we get rid of blindness? Or do you mean it's on hit for a certain amount of time
You dont, the killer have used a perk slot to be able to make survivors lives just a "bit less easy", do u really need the game to always HOLD YOUR HAND?
Yeah the killer should totally have one perk that can render Bond, Open Handed, Kindred, Plunderer's Instinct, Detective's Hunch, Deja Vu, Empathy, Dark Sense, Object of Obsession, and Alert entirely useless. Great and balanced idea!
First: it's a hex perk.
Second: it's job is to make your life harder by robbing you of your key information.
Third : when you have Killers whose entire power can be completely countered by crouching I think you can excuse one perk that can be removed from the game being able to counter to a couple of other perks
FYI the thread is suggesting to make it a non-hex perk that lasts the whole match upon being hit once.
-
@yeet said:
A survivor running sprint burst gives you more time to work on gens, you do not exist in a bubble.Good thing that you brought WGLF. I can't wait to be farmed the moment I get on the hook.
You brought No Mither? Great!
- said no one ever
-
@yeet said:
Visionmaker said:@brokedownpalace said:
Bug_Reporter said:
@Milo said: Sooo then how do we get rid of blindness? Or do you mean it's on hit for a certain amount of time You dont, the killer have used a perk slot to be able to make survivors lives just a "bit less easy", do u really need the game to always HOLD YOUR HAND?
Yeah the killer should totally have one perk that can render Bond, Open Handed, Kindred, Plunderer's Instinct, Detective's Hunch, Deja Vu, Empathy, Dark Sense, Object of Obsession, and Alert entirely useless. Great and balanced idea!
But survivors have 16 perks
/s
They do, it's incredibly disingenuous to claim that other survivors perks don't affect you.
Hey I didn't bring my SB or SC, can I borrow yours?
-
@Master said:
@kotoalex12 said:
I was just wondering if there is any particular reason that survivors who go into a lobby with friends spawn into the lobby at the same time. It is difficult enough for my friends and I to find matches when we play together and some killers see that 2-4 of us come in at the same time and instantly back out of the lobby making us wait more time to find a match and hopefully not have the killer quit. Is it possible for devs to change the way people spawn into the lobby that way killers can't tell who is playing with friends and who isn't?Do you prefer it when the killer DCs ingame? I believe that lobby dodging is the only reason why killers basically never DC. If you wanna have a killer DC rate as high as the survivor Dc rate, go ahead
Yes. Give me that 5k survival points.
-
@brokedownpalace said:
Bug_Reporter said:@Milo said:
Sooo then how do we get rid of blindness? Or do you mean it's on hit for a certain amount of time
You dont, the killer have used a perk slot to be able to make survivors lives just a "bit less easy", do u really need the game to always HOLD YOUR HAND?
Yeah the killer should totally have one perk that can render Bond, Open Handed, Kindred, Plunderer's Instinct, Detective's Hunch, Deja Vu, Empathy, Dark Sense, Object of Obsession, and Alert entirely useless. Great and balanced idea!
But survivors have 16 perks
/s
-
Because they will have the choice of sitting there for 2 minutes doing nothing.
Though I think if you are on your 1st or 2nd hook and you get instakilled, it should grant you the 870 struggle points.
-
@Vortexas said:
@Visionmaker said:
Then new players can't play at all with their higher ranked friends because they'll instantly get demolished.And? It's fair for high level survivors to demolish low level killers?
You roll with a high level survivor you deal with High Level killers
No. You get an average #. 3 Rank 2s and 1 Rank 20 face a Rank 6.
Just as valid as you roll with low level survivors, you deal with Low level killers.
-
@yeet said:
Visionmaker said:They're already planning to rework half of the killers.
I'm talking about big changes to base mechanics
If the reworked killers have the same anti-chase capabilities as new Hag, I don't see where's the need.
-
Then new players can't play at all with their higher ranked friends because they'll instantly get demolished.
-
They're already planning to rework half of the killers.
-
@tronixton said:
In hindsight, lightborn would have been great, but I just dont really want to pour 30 levels into Billy. He doesnt suit my playstyle. And the animation blind isn't counterable. As soon as he was downed I was being blinded by 2 flashlights. If I took the bullet and didn't pick him up, he'd get healed, and if I picked him up, he'd be flash saved. I will concede the point that directional hook is frivolous and mostly pointless, but facecamping is an easy way to lose anyway.It's counterable by perks and the facing walls... With the new timing, you have to be in much closer proximity to the killer too (to get there within 2 seconds), so you can easily find them within reach after downing a survivor. Getting blinded by two flashlights is also harder than just flashlighting alone.
You were demolished by higher skilled players, and by the fact that you chose to attempt no counterplay. It's not because of SWF. A solo player would still accomplish the same thing.
You not wanting to get Lightborn to counter 4-man flashlights is as valid as survivors not wanting to get Urban Evasion to counter the Hag, Nurse, and Trapper. If you don't want to change the way you play, then you can easily default to using a perk that completely negates flashlight saves.
-
Outland said:
@Visionmaker said:
Hook farming should only be allowed if you can fight back or kill a teammate.It's one-sided. It's unfun being killed. Being a "solo" player doesn't mean you should be able to deliberately kill a teammate with zero repurcussion or resistance. I can choose to equip Bond and OoO to sabotage my team every game, does that mean I should be rewarded?
It's a braindead suggestion. The category is called BENEVOLENCE and ALTRUISM, yet you think you are entitled to points for not being benevolent and altruistic?
Emblems are another thing all together, if I don't care about emblems, why do I need to behave a certain way?
Do searching chests fit in any emblem category? I'm not sure if they do, but there sure is a BP award for opening one. If say chests had a chance of being totally empty. It would be like opening a chest and getting the point reward for it, but there not being anything in the chest, so they take away my searching points.
I still spent the time opening the chest and leaving myself vulnerable. I deserve the points for action made, not the item I found or didn't find in this example.
The points that I earn by doing actions in the game, risking my own neck to get closer to the Killer, those points should be awarded regardless of the outcome of the actions. That's why they are awarded when you do the action.
Chests are objectives. You get OBJECTIVE points. Items inside serve to help you escape. Even not taking the item helps your team. Chests do not grant emblem points because the emblem is called LIGHT BRINGER (powering generators and door). Chests are not empty, there is no comparison.The Bloodpoints category for unhooking is called ALTRUISM. Please look up what it means, because you are not entitled to ALTRUISM points for harming your teammates. -
Hook farming should only be allowed if you can fight back or kill a teammate.It's one-sided. It's unfun being killed. Being a "solo" player doesn't mean you should be able to deliberately kill a teammate with zero repurcussion or resistance. I can *choose* to equip Bond and OoO to sabotage my team every game, does that mean I should be rewarded?It's a braindead suggestion. The category is called BENEVOLENCE and ALTRUISM, yet you think you are entitled to points for not being benevolent and altruistic?
-
If you're starting the lobby with 4 flashlights, you should be using Lightborn and/or Franklins, facing a wall, or proxying the body for lurking survivors. Flashlight saves have already been nerfed, so being demolished by them is indicative of how better the four stack was than you as players. As it is now, Lightborn makes flashlight saves almost impossible.Hooking from all directions is not necessary, and unhooking from all directions was not implemented as QoL. Bodyblocking survivors is a finite strategy, while a bodyblocking killer is infinite and uncounterable.The point of the survivors is that being and working together makes them stronger. But the only annoying things you mentioned are counterable, and isn't only the product of a strong team, but also your own poor choices.
-
@Unit said:
CryoHooked said:Woah, Uh That would be a bad idea, due to the fact the game is still mostly killer sided at the moment.
It's supposed to be
It's ASYMMETRICAL, not UNBALANCED.
-
@Delfador said:
It is a terrible idea and will never work in favor of a killer.
Getting hooked means a failure and we try to award it by giving a buff to survivors. It should not happen naturally. You can keep your kindred as a perk and use it but innate ability is too much. People don't understand but this change is much more problematic than bloodlust imo.Giving survivors more information to be on par with SWF is obviously not intended to benefit the killer. Why should it? The point is so that solos' experience isn't absolute trash compared to grouping up.
Getting hooked shouldn't spell out instant death just because you decided to queue alone. Being able to coordinate with other solos will alleviate being left for dead on the hook and discourage camping.
The pallet changes, pick up changes (flashlight and save nerf), and low-tier killer changes are what is working to benefit killers as a whole. Soon, we'll have 4 killers buffed, with Pig confirmed on reddit as well. Changes that aren't dedicated to buffing killers aren't "problematic", they serve to fix other areas of the game.
-
No mercy or freebies from me.I just wouldn't camp a survivor with No Mither.
-
@Eninya said:
There's already only two reliable ways to get WGLF stacks: Unhooks, and hits taken while the killer is carrying someone. Distraction can't even reliably be done, even if you run in to take a hit for someone at the last second. That perk is so finicky because the game almost never wants to award Protection tokens where it should.Even then... it doesn't promote good gameplay, it promotes people taking unnecessary hits. Not exactly conducive to survival.
-
@Jack11803 said:
@brokedownpalace said:
Lowbei said:
Raccoon said:@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
@Raccoon said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi)
Resets
?
" Is it literally like it resets or that it still has the normal exhaustion effect? "
idk about you, but every time i get impaled in real life, i feel refreshed and ready to run.
Yeah because this game is so realistic.
When pursuing.... I often to get stunned and blind sided a bit when someone turns around and slaps me with hard wood
I thought that only happened in pornos.
-
@Pirscher said:
Pirscher said:In-built kindred for solo survivors only? Or for both SWF and solo survivors? Can someone please verify.
^^
Oh my bad. I think it's both.
xo
-
Wiping out Exhaustion from being hooked is clearly to assist survivors being farmed.
If you're still debuffed with Exhaustion, you're being unhooked by a person who could not wait 30 seconds for you. Usually this means that you're a solo survivor who cannot communicate when your debuff is running out, or that you're being farmed. Otherwise, it changes nothing. This is not a "buff", as much as it is a QoL change.
Considering that they've nerfed survivors across the board with the pallet vacuum, and buffed underused killers and killers across the board with pick up times, it's unsurprising that they're balancing solo and SWF gameplay. This is a positive, and quite expected turn of events (ex: Obsession shown to everyone).
@Pirscher said:
In-built kindred for solo survivors only? Or for both SWF and solo survivors? Can someone please verify.Makes no sense to not give it to both. People need to stop being obsessed with handicapping players for inviting their friends to play. Worry more about being thrown under the bus for wanting to play solo.
@powerbats said:
There's several all by the same posters all repeating the same regurgitated arguments after not getting the fuzzy responses they crave. It's almost as if they have amnesia where they forgot how they told the survivors to adapt and or wait to see how things actually work out.Devs: "Pallet vacuum is dead."
Forum: "ENTITLED SURVIVORS NEED TO ADAPT OR DIE"
Devs: "Survivors won't instadie from trolling teammates anymore."
Forum: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" -
dannyfrog87 said:
@Visionmaker said:
dannyfrog87 said:@Visionmaker said:
dannyfrog87 said:
@Visionmaker said: dannyfrog87 said:
ok i wake up to about 80 comments. right the main issue is. i found the hatch first. as far as i could tell i walked away 3 times in a row just for the survivor to take the hatch. so you are damn right i should of been entitled to close the hatch to those saying i should of slugged etc. anyway i got the achievement so kudos to those guys for not dcing on me on haddonfield
The killer's objective isn't finding the hatch. It's finding the survivor before they found the hatch. That's the point of the asymmetrical game. You are entitled to closing the hatch as much as you are to closing an exit gate or locking a generator: not at all.
Here's an easy solution:
Increase hatch spawn requirements by 1 generator.
Two chests respawn with a temporary key.
The hatch now spawns closed even with one survivor left, but makes a quiet noise.
Killer can no longer stand on the hatch.
A survivor automatically opens and enters the hatch when near it using the key.
Survivors cannot be grabbed out of the hatch.
Survivors need to work harder to get, find, and use the hatch. Killers have more time to find the survivor. Neither are able to do a standoff.
cannot be grabbed. get out of here with that and cant stand on the hatch. more survivor entitlement. so yeah we are powerless then cant grab them. yeah thats a no. the devs would never implement that then and if they did my word. the stupidity would be real. a temporary key giving another free save than doing a gen or actual objective. no
You aren't entitled to a free kill.
How about you find and kill them before they completed 3 generators, get a key, and find the hatch?
are we going to go over this again? i found the hatch first so your damn right i am if i managed to get enough evil to gain perma ew3 with only one gen left .... to kill everyone and i patrolled gens 3 times they did nothing in all of that time. just like they are not entitled to a free escape. i have my opinion. and your idea of "balance" just favours another free escape cant grab and allow their to be a key equalling another free escape. nothing more else to say because its just entitlement. now if i hadnt of gone through all that to gain enough ew3 then fair enough. so i was entitled to the kill as its hard enough as it is. survivor is easy mode. so save it. before doing 3 gens? i was trying to get the evil within achievement not murder them instantly. the hatch standoff breaks the balance when going for this what part of that dont you understand? ok ive nothing more to say your just ignoring whats said.
A killer's job isn't to find the hatch. They don't find generators and complete them. They don't run from a entity that can kill them. Stop parading the idea of finding the hatch first as if you were a survivor. This is an asymmetrical game and the point is ASYMMETRY. The killer's goal and the survivors goals are different.
Keep your opinion and we'll keep the standoff because you apparently think completing objectives is "free escapes". FYI, hatch, chests, and generators all give objective points, so survivors are literally completing objectives for that escape, so I don't know what you're getting at.
a killers job isnt to find the hatch. haha so its to let you escape or not check if your around it? ok. nothing more to say to you. your bias is so unreal its ridiculous. erm well so you want us to sit in a corner then and be like hey survivor go find your free escape by not seeing if your near by? ok. no hatch standoff needs to go and your opinion is invalid and frankly moronic. anyway. i know im right so that is that. good day
Lmao, every post you began with "well I found the hatch first" and then you act like I'm asking you not to look for survivors?That's the point, Sherlock. You should be saying: "I found the survivor so I should get that kill!". But you didnt find the survivor before they met their objectives, and get salty because they're essentially waiting at an exit gate.You're just sitting there getting all pissy because you found an inanimate survivor objective and you expect to be awarded with a kill. If you're using Tombstone to begin with, you should've managed your Evil charges to Mori and a standoff wouldn't be a problem. -
dannyfrog87 said:
@Visionmaker said:
dannyfrog87 said:@Visionmaker said:
dannyfrog87 said:
ok i wake up to about 80 comments. right the main issue is. i found the hatch first. as far as i could tell i walked away 3 times in a row just for the survivor to take the hatch. so you are damn right i should of been entitled to close the hatch to those saying i should of slugged etc. anyway i got the achievement so kudos to those guys for not dcing on me on haddonfield
The killer's objective isn't finding the hatch. It's finding the survivor before they found the hatch. That's the point of the asymmetrical game. You are entitled to closing the hatch as much as you are to closing an exit gate or locking a generator: not at all.Here's an easy solution:
Increase hatch spawn requirements by 1 generator.
Two chests respawn with a temporary key.
The hatch now spawns closed even with one survivor left, but makes a quiet noise.
Killer can no longer stand on the hatch.
A survivor automatically opens and enters the hatch when near it using the key.
Survivors cannot be grabbed out of the hatch.
Survivors need to work harder to get, find, and use the hatch. Killers have more time to find the survivor. Neither are able to do a standoff.
cannot be grabbed. get out of here with that and cant stand on the hatch. more survivor entitlement. so yeah we are powerless then cant grab them. yeah thats a no. the devs would never implement that then and if they did my word. the stupidity would be real. a temporary key giving another free save than doing a gen or actual objective. no
You aren't entitled to a free kill.
How about you find and kill them before they completed 3 generators, get a key, and find the hatch?
are we going to go over this again? i found the hatch first so your damn right i am if i managed to get enough evil to gain perma ew3 with only one gen left .... to kill everyone and i patrolled gens 3 times they did nothing in all of that time. just like they are not entitled to a free escape. i have my opinion. and your idea of "balance" just favours another free escape cant grab and allow their to be a key equalling another free escape. nothing more else to say because its just entitlement. now if i hadnt of gone through all that to gain enough ew3 then fair enough. so i was entitled to the kill as its hard enough as it is. survivor is easy mode. so save it. before doing 3 gens? i was trying to get the evil within achievement not murder them instantly. the hatch standoff breaks the balance when going for this what part of that dont you understand? ok ive nothing more to say your just ignoring whats said.
A killer's job isn't to find the hatch. They don't find generators and complete them. They don't run from a entity that can kill them. Stop parading the idea of finding the hatch first as if you were a survivor. This is an asymmetrical game and the point is ASYMMETRY. The killer's goal and the survivors goals are *different*.Keep your opinion and we'll keep the standoff because you apparently think completing objectives is "free escapes". FYI, hatch, chests, and generators all give objective points, so survivors are literally completing objectives for that escape, so I don't know what you're getting at. -
dannyfrog87 said:
@Visionmaker said:
dannyfrog87 said:ok i wake up to about 80 comments. right the main issue is. i found the hatch first. as far as i could tell i walked away 3 times in a row just for the survivor to take the hatch. so you are damn right i should of been entitled to close the hatch to those saying i should of slugged etc. anyway i got the achievement so kudos to those guys for not dcing on me on haddonfield
The killer's objective isn't finding the hatch. It's finding the survivor before they found the hatch. That's the point of the asymmetrical game. You are entitled to closing the hatch as much as you are to closing an exit gate or locking a generator: not at all.
Here's an easy solution:
Increase hatch spawn requirements by 1 generator.
Two chests respawn with a temporary key.
The hatch now spawns closed even with one survivor left, but makes a quiet noise.
Killer can no longer stand on the hatch.
A survivor automatically opens and enters the hatch when near it using the key.
Survivors cannot be grabbed out of the hatch.
Survivors need to work harder to get, find, and use the hatch. Killers have more time to find the survivor. Neither are able to do a standoff.
cannot be grabbed. get out of here with that and cant stand on the hatch. more survivor entitlement. so yeah we are powerless then cant grab them. yeah thats a no. the devs would never implement that then and if they did my word. the stupidity would be real. a temporary key giving another free save than doing a gen or actual objective. no
You aren't entitled to a free kill.How about you find and kill them before they completed 3 generators, get a key, and find the hatch? If you can't do that, then you've failed.Also, don't ######### about a hatch standoff when you're not open to changing it. -
dannyfrog87 said:
ok i wake up to about 80 comments. right the main issue is. i found the hatch first. as far as i could tell i walked away 3 times in a row just for the survivor to take the hatch. so you are damn right i should of been entitled to close the hatch to those saying i should of slugged etc. anyway i got the achievement so kudos to those guys for not dcing on me on haddonfield
The killer's objective isn't finding the hatch. It's finding the survivor before they found the hatch. That's the point of the asymmetrical game. You are entitled to closing the hatch as much as you are to closing an exit gate or locking a generator: not at all.Here's an easy solution:1. Increase hatch spawn requirements by 1 generator.2. Two chests respawn with a temporary key.3. The hatch now spawns closed even with one survivor left, but makes a quiet noise.4. Killer can no longer stand on the hatch.5. A survivor automatically opens and enters the hatch when near it using the key.6. Survivors cannot be grabbed out of the hatch.Survivors need to work harder to get, find, and use the hatch. Killers have more time to find the survivor. Neither are able to do a standoff. -
Badmanone said:Ok i explain it: just because I want to see your stupid face and how you try to type something against it to be right. People will abuse it by put on a fake personality, so not the real nice person get endorsed only the one with the best (fake) attitude for others.Having a fake nice attitude is just as good as a real nice attitude. It's not a thought policing system, it's to encourage positive *behavior*. You don't get banned for thinking "wow screw that survivor" and then typing Gg instead.Your poor behavior and name calling puts a damper on everyone else's experience in game. Any less of that is a good thing.I don't know why everyone keeps throwing "abuse" around. It's like no one knows what it means anymore.Although I do think players should get a few shards for endorsing players, plus a few bonus ones for endorsing the killer (because they have no teammates to be endorsed by.)
-
@Tizzle said:
The Survivors can get the Killer out of the pallet by letting Killer grab during vault, some Survivors are jerks though and I can understand a Killer leaving because of this. I always get them unstuck.I think this only happens on Shelter Woods at the shack on a pallet save.
Most survivors don't know this. It's rare to even happen.
-
Spy checks in DBD?
-
Yes
because I never hit it when I need to :^)
-
@Doom_Punk said:
That would be pretty horrible if the Killer starts to lag.Go have a Survivor host a KYF lobby, have someone else be a Killer, and it breaks a lot for Killers.
As opposed to now, where if the killer lags, every interaction forces you to stall for 30 seconds?
-
Being petty is probably more accurate.Delfador said:He literally blames her being a liar and the last sentence is so aggressive. Tru3 is a nice person and i actually am surprised to see that. Maybe the word 'attack' was an exaggeration. -
Beardedragon said:
i actually thought i was the only one. when i watch streamers they seem to be able to find and track down people doing chases fine, but i cant see a god damn thing.
and yea, crouching as the Pig in that stage is a nightmare!
why does survivors hate the map?
Totems take years to find and are harder to see, and God forbid the Killer is Hag.Jigsaw Boxes can be placed on the four corners of the map, meaning you'll die if anything happens.The bottom areas are mazes, it's easy to run into a dead-end and get yourself killed, and it takes forever to find an entrance/exit.The pallet/vault distribution is god awful because they're heavily concentrated in land marks, so you're pretty much dead if you're caught in the open.But I like it better than getting MacMillan for the fiftieth time in a row. -
The devs already said they were nerfing instaheals actually. It just so happens BNP got nerfed first. 🤷♂️Tsulan said:@Visionmaker said:
12% slower windup with both addons in total post nerf.Machine Gun Huntress was bullshit anyway. Maybe now this combo will be objectively worse than her oneshot combo.
Insta healing a downed survivor was bullshit. But this? Naaahh
-
Tsulan said:
@Visionmaker said:
Tsulan said:@Visionmaker said:
@Tsulan said:
But which one do you touch first? The 0% gen or the 50% which is regressing?
Whichever one is more receptive to my loving caress.
You are avoiding the question.
I thought that was obvious.
You keep doing it.
Common, you know you want to say it.
Survivors camp and tunnel gens as much as killers do.Why I never! I am a sophisticated survivor that goes for the chests first. Then I patiently wait for one of the other survivors to get injured! -
I thought that was obvious.Tsulan said:@Visionmaker said:
@Tsulan said:
But which one do you touch first? The 0% gen or the 50% which is regressing?Whichever one is more receptive to my loving caress.
You are avoiding the question.
-
@Tsulan said:
But which one do you touch first? The 0% gen or the 50% which is regressing?Whichever one is more receptive to my loving caress.
-
@Orion said:
@Judgement said:
@azazer said:
So it's my responsibility to suffer other people's terrible ping?Dedicated servers when?
Do you know how servers work? People with ######### connections will still have ######### connections.
At least they won't be able to lag switch.
-
@Tsulan said:
Please answer this honstely OP.
If you see two gens next to each other. One is untouched and the other one is half finished, but regressing. Which one would you start to repair?Get them both to 99 to hear the glorious double BING.
-
BM at a pallet or exit gate
Hello or LOL everywhere else
-
@EpicFailTryHard said:
you are delusional and just mad because that is the only way you can rank up. seriously...stfu.Actually it's so easy to pip, the real struggle is ranking down without completely screwing your team.
-
@powerbats said:
@EpicFailTryHard said:
i have made the observation as well. swf being the problem that killers face (16 perk equivalent for survivors) means killer buffs and survivors nerfs which inevitably screws the solo survivors. i have also noticed how much easier solo survivors are compared to swf.Wow good [BAD WORD] grief, you and the whiny 16 perks nonsense. You're facing 4 perks most of them the exact same ones. It's almost always sc/sb/ds/ue sometimes one is swappedout. So stop using that whiny lame ass excuse it's as bad as the cheating excuse which the devs have said it isn't cheating.
Yes wf gives and advantage as does voice but you and a few others will whine no matter what unless you get 4 sacs every game it seems.
Hey, can I borrow your DS? I used three of them already. Swap you for your Self-Care! Could use another 50% healing.