Itooshie
Itooshie
About
- Username
- Itooshie
- Joined
- Visits
- 372
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Buckoben said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2278190#Comment_2278190
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/K0W9691Q6JKY/image.png
We don't believe you.
BHVR should have #Unlinkedtheset yesterday.
You cant trust leaks all time. Take Genshin Impact for example. Ive seen this tweet thrown around but they have been wrong before about dates. As much as I love them leakers are not always 100% true.
Just curious in the case of Bubba, where the opposite happened, it was linked and then unlinked, did you negotioate for that to happen or it was also intended to not be a linked set.
We all can now see that Devs can turn on and off the linked set requirement at will.
And how are we defining what is and isnt maintaining the image of the licensed product?
-
@catbeans said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2277148#Comment_2277148
That's ######### stupid. If BHVR sells a product on any system it should ######### work. And right now it seems like it's not working on any system.
Its not a matter of BHVR its the Switch system its just inferior to other options. Like using a low end PC and wondering why your frames drop.
Its not a huge secret that the switch cant cope with games. Nor is it a secret that DBD doesnt run perfectly on other consoles ether.
As a consumer you know what you are getting into. The recent patch just made everything from mediocre to bad. It'll will be fixed eventually 😳 .... maybe.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
Name and profile change applies to Cybil, Jon, and Lisa. Does not apply to Krampus or Minotaur. Chris and Claire have unique voices, cannot confirm if Lisa/Cybil do or don't.
They dont have unique voices. Can confirm Johnno still has Steves voice
-
They do apply to Lisa, Cybil and my boy Johnno yeah
-
@DanielPaint said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2277148#Comment_2277148
My research was 30 fps and for a long time it was so and the quality were good. Then after every update it got worse and worse
The fps drops are across all consoles atm. They will patch it... Hopefully. But dont expect anything better than what you had before on Switch. Thats all.🙊🤷♂️
-
@Jago said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2277148#Comment_2277148
Oh so you'd say Cyberpunk was nice on release date.
If it's unplayable, a game shoudnt be on the market. End of the story.
Dont go putting words in my mouth just to sound cool now.
Thats not even a fair comparison 🤭
-
I know how you feel, but it was your mistake for purchasing on switch if you ask me.
Its such a weak console. I speak from experience since I own one. Its a big case of doing your research before you buy.
Theres no excuse for ps4/xbox, but im on ps5 so i cant comment on their current issues
-
I rebuke this narrative that the Nea set is fine unlinked. There's clearly issues with that one. Missing torso, Bald head. That set needs to be linked to look nice. Otherwise the head looks ugly 🤢
But this isn't about Nea or sets in general. Its the shady practice of linking cosmetics that were previously not linked. We must make them know this is not okay and we have seen what they did.
-
@Bluebird said:
I know you're talking about Leon and Jill's, but I will say that for the most part, when Licensed Outfits are sets, that's usually the License Holders' decision, not necessarily BHVR's (I mean why can't Cheryl's 'Fresh Start' sets be unlinked?), however since you're talking about Jill and Leon's, which were never meant to be linked, I completely agree. It was a terrible idea for them to link it solely to grab more cash.
The main difference here is that there is a clear difference with the original product. In the case of Leon and Jill, they are look almost/ are identical to he default product. So we are expected to pay full price of a set for what is really only a 2 piece cosmetic.
-
@TheGorgon said:
I must be the only one to find his only flaws are the early game and his zombies serving much less value to the killer on larger maps.
With existing perks and add-ons that mitigate his weakness, I’ve found him to be powerful and effective in every rank, and I don’t think this will change in the future.
I find him great to play against too, I just love all the aspects about him and I, in no way, find any part of his kit to be detrimental.
Ive played maybe 15-20 games and It’s not enough to form a great opinion on the guy, but there’s only been 2 games where I got 2k’s, 4 3k’s, and the rest were 4K’s (I’m rank4 rn)
I’m seeing as this is the general consensus (this posts opinion), but I highly disagree. I find him to be low A.
I agree, I dont understand what the issue is, he's pretty reliable to play as and fun to play against.
They also did listen and changed it so you can tier up off survivors - buffed his perks. Nemesis feels like hes in a good place and strong with practice.
-
I feel like if we did this on twitter enough, it would get their attention. Spam their socials, then they surely will notice.
I normally dont care about linked sets, but having them unlinked and now linking them, thats a shady move and I cant support it.
-
I don't get this Mentality of "I feel like I dont deserve a down" if the survivor is dumb enough to get caught then you got a down, as killer you need to have as much pressure as possible. Most survivors wont be so kind to you regardless of if you did or didnt "deserve" a down.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160772#Comment_2160772
That's the thing, though. It isnt a major plotpoint. It isnt focused on heavily and no big deal is made of it.
To quote, "Our monsters are gay and I DO make the rules."
I know what you mean, but I probably should have worded myself better... When I said plot I was referring to the overall lore of the character, the lore is that it is a demon that comes to those grieving. He is only confirmed pan outside of the series by the creators. Yes they get to make the monsters whatever they want, but that's not true representation imo. That's slapping a label on the yogurt to sell it better to the market. Atleast thats how I see it. It's not the same as him happening to be pan and confirmed via lore as we discussed before. Unless I am mistaken? Then please correct me.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160768#Comment_2160768
Ah the 15 page one during the ThirdGreatWar™.
I can't remember the First or Second very well so idk if it went higher
We can break the record if we try hard enough UwU
-
@Pulsar said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160735#Comment_2160735
Is the series any good?
I've not really heard of it before and it looks a little cheesy to me, but I admittedly haven't watched it.
It is, high recommend.
I agree with the diverse representation, but I think I still think it's unrealistic to consider monsters and entities as representation that's all. But if you can feel represented by demons and monsters more power to you.
I did just have a look into the monsters we are getting though.
The Birch storyline is written by an LGBT person but the actual person that becomes The Birch has no confirmed identity although, they were a female that had a boyfriend prior to transformation.
The Mordeo are a species similar to the wendigo so there isn't really a set identity as they are a species of creatures. But there are three people in the series that transformed into a Mordeo, two girls and a male.
The male has no backstory, one girl is a teen with no confirmation on lgbt they are a teen as well. The second girl was a bride to be and it doesn't state if it was hetero or homosexual wedding.
And The LookSee is a demon whom comes to those that have difficulty overcoming grief. I'm not sure where it being Pan comes into anything really. It doesn't seem like a major plot point at all?
-
This will never be easy for BHVR to do. And I think its a discussion/topic that alot of us have at heart. I understand what you are both conveying to me but I cant help but feel as if it's unfair to equate CryptTV monsters with people. Feels like a very weird area to be treading.
I know that CTV have given their monsters identities, but, it's not as if they thats a reasonable form of representation? They are monsters. The stereotype character would stick out as a token character? I think it becomes whether you would say monsters that have been labled LGBTQ+ are fair representation to the community?
Now that I think about it though, trickster is about as flamboyant as it could get in DBD at the moment and I love him.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160657#Comment_2160657
I think what Mooks is getting at is, because of the CryptTV characters, nobody could now call them a token character even if they were stereotypical. Token characters exist to check boxes and usually there's only one- we're getting 3 in one swoop today.
Maybe I just dont understand where their identities even fit in with their lore. Are they not just monsters and or beings that dont even need identities? Feels like a big cop out to me to say something like that. Do people honestly find representation from the beings in CryptTV?
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160648#Comment_2160648
And that's all lgbtq+ people want too. A single, throwaway, one line in the lore to show "HEY THIS IS A GAY RELATIONSHIP" or "HEY THIS CHARACTER IS TRANS" without making their entire lore about being gay/trans. It's there if you look for it but not if you don't.
That's what we want, equal treatment.
This. No. Tokenism. No Stereotypes. This is the perfect way to introduce the LGBT character.
Leave the stereotypes for the skins if we must have them
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160515#Comment_2160515
But we already get non stereotypical representation.
having a character that happens to also have some kind of stereotypical trait wouldn’t be that bad when you have multiple different representations. After all, there are gay people that are flamboyant. And there is nothing wrong with that.
i think the Movie „Love, Simon“ did it pretty well. They had 3 gay characters, one of them being super ‚effeminate‘. But it was obvious that the main char wasn’t flamboyant or anything. They played pretty well with these topics imo.
That feels like a really big cop out if you ask me.
I'm not sure why but you saying that beings from CryptTV are fair representation, really offends me? They are monsters, not people. Or can we slap a label on anything now and call it representation? Not to mention these are skins and not a character of BHVRs own design.
I just believe that using a stereotypical flamboyant gay is not the way to go when introducing their first lgbt survivor/killer. Aswell as just against stereotypes of lgbt in general. Personally, if I'm honest, I'm against the flamboyant gay stereotype because thats the harassment I have faced as a member of LGBT even though I'm not as flamboyant as some others, Im often assumed such and harassed because of it.😕🙃
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160407#Comment_2160407
You said inclusion of LGBTQ+ wouldn’t go down well and will result in a token character…
and I pointed out that we already have confirmed chars coming that are not token or stereotyped chars.
Thats not what I said, if you go back through the replies.
It was in reference to them just putting in a flamboyant gay and calling it a day. Making a stereotype lbtq character is just making tokenism as thats how we are often portrayed online and in media, as the GBF, the flamboyant homo.
The tokenism/sterotypes is what I said would not go down well, not the the inclusion of a queer character.
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160391#Comment_2160391
We already got non-stereotyping and non-token LGBTQ+ representation confirmed in Look-See, Birch and Mordeo by CryptTV.
granted those are licensed and legendary chars but the devs have stated before they don’t differentiate between licensed and original characters. They are all characters for them.
I cant tell what your point is here? Because that seems very off base on what I was talking about.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160371#Comment_2160371
She's not confirmed lgbtq+. Not gay, bi, pan, trans, etc. We don't know what she is.
Shes a queen, duh, isnt that the Q in LGBTQ+? 👑💅💅💅
-
@Johnny_XMan said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160340#Comment_2160340
I don’t know, I’d like to think it’s just the way people are. I own my feminine side and my masculine side. I’m also quite capable of acknowledging that there is also gay people that are only feminine or masculine.
I don’t think there is anything wrong with adding a specific personality trait.
Whichever way they choose to bring a lgbtq character, we all know it isn’t going to encompass every single gay person out there, but the representation will still be acknowledged.
It just wont go down well, It will just seem like a token character. "The flaming homo" which is not the representation thats needed. (Imo) I want a gay character that isnt just the GBF, sipping tea and shouting sis 😒
Id feel like a joke and not a serious attempt at making an interesting lgbt representitive.
Its different from real life individuals being comfortable and expressive of their personality.
-
@miketheratguy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160272#Comment_2160272
This is a controversial topic but I personally agree, homosexuality is not a choice. Again, I've known several and am still friends with / related to several who are, and I feel that anyone who's spent any time with someone who isn't straight can pretty easily understand that it's an inherent feeling, not a choice that they made after waking up one day.
I related it to something like race / ethnicity, which is something else that a person can't change. I use the Doctor in this game, he's black (or at least African-American). I like the character a lot, I think that he's one of the more interesting characters in the game. As mentioned my favorite games in the GTA series heavily (or exclusively) required me to play as a young black man. I didn't think anything of it because the game was good. It's not as if I didn't notice - there are obvious cultural and ethnic differences - I just didn't care, and when I say I didn't care what I mean is "it did nothing to worsen my experience".
To that extent, as a straight male maybe it IS difficult to understand why some people who are not feel that a game or film (or what have you) isn't complete until someone more like themselves is included. To me it's not about representation or inclusion, I have nothing wrong with any of that. I just don't like modern society's highly politicized atmosphere which fosters the belief that if you DON'T go out of your way to tick all the boxes and include someone who represents all possible types of people, you are in fact a bigot and must make amends. This is painting with a broad brush, but this is also currently the world (at least the country) that I live in. As another example, the actress Ashley Judd once said that she couldn't stand hearing pro-Trump rhetoric at a basketball game (or something) and unironically advocated for the existence of "safe spaces" where people don't have to listen to anyone who feels differently about something than they do. That's the kind of dividing line where freedom of speech becomes an evil, the ability to have different opinions seen as something negative. One side wants to determine what's best for everyone. THAT is what I don't agree with. Not inclusion, not diversity, but those who feel that anyone who opposes such things are bad, wrong, intolerant, bigoted, evil, etc.
I'm not saying that this was the prevailing attitude of the thread before I made my comment. That said, my comment was informed by having had many negative experiences with other people, away from this forum, who feel that "tolerance" and "inclusion" is something that must be forced in all walks of life, and if someone dares to find that attitude uncomfortable, then that person is inherently, morally "wrong". That is the slippery slope that makes me uncomfortable, and was exemplified, in my opinion, by my having been called a bigot for trying to express this viewpoint.
TL;DR: I have a hyper-conservative friend who thinks that homosexuality is a sin that should be cured by shock therapy. I have gay relatives who live happier, more productive, more positive lives than this other guy could ever hope to achieve. My point? They've all lived their own individual lives, they've all had their own individual experiences, They all have the right to believe what they do, based on a set of morals and ethics that, for various reasons, feel right to THEM. I have no problem with them all existing. It's when one tries to force those morals and ethics on others, to make others think the way that they do lest they be shamed for not doing so, that is a slippery slope that I find uncomfortable. That is basically all I was trying to say.
Bottom line, if BHVR creates a flamboyantly gay trans character (just as a hypothetical example), so be it. I'll still play the game. If they don't, so be it, I'll still play the game. I don't hold it against people for wanting to see someone close to themselves represented in their chosen form of media, I just don't share the opinion that it's a necessity for enjoying said media. If a LBQT game is a lot of fun, I'll still play it. But my moral compass doesn't have to be everyone else's.
To be fair they will never do a flamboyant queer character because that is the definition of stereotyping which is what they are trying to avoid for the character.
I can totally see Ace as a dragqueen tho, the dang silverfox 🤪
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160285#Comment_2160285
What facts could you possibly use to support being such a bigot?
Change my mind about being gay, cause rn my boyfriend exists and he makes me happier than I've been with any woman, so
That was so pure omg.🥲 Go you👏👏
-
This made me laugh really hard bc you know its true.
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2160248#Comment_2160248
I see that last bit as being indirected towards me 👀
My point there was that if you don't have the experience your opinion shouldn't be held as highly than people who do have the experience, be it on representation or the benefits of eating healthy. If you disagree, cool. That joys of opinions am I right.
👀 not really but thanks for taking the bullet I guess. I just skim read most the walls.
I dont beleive in what you are saying because that way of thinking just leads to peoples opinions being dismissed and causing an echo chamber.
Everyone experiences different things, im sure I have had a completley different life to someone of the same sexual orentation and race, so whos opinon should be held more higher?🤷♂️
-
I have not read these giant walls of text debates. But here's my 2 cents.
- I'm a homo, that is specifically, Asexual Gay Man.
- Person of Ethnic Decent
I never feel this burning desire to be represented in media I consume, be it literature, gaming or visual media *Anime, TV, Movies
All I ask is that if we get a Queer character, let it not be a token. The backstory should not be revolved around their sexuality, it should just be a nice detail weaved into their life, not the defining characteristic of their personality.
A character like that, would make me happy. Thats what would represent me, a person that has many interests and hobbies that also happens to be gay. Its not hard, its not something that needs a big debate and its not something that will end the DBD world.
🤷♂️ Me being a gay and ethnic minority does not give me more of say/mean I am more right or wrong btw.
A straight white opinion has as much value as mine does if you ask me.
-
On the topic of streamer bullies.
My assumption on why I think people try to bully or BM streams is an inferirority complex, one that disgusts me to be frank.
They wont say it or admit it but Im sure thats what it is. Maybe they're not even concious of it.
"Wow how dare they stream a game they like."
"Wow streamer with what? 2 viewers pft they must think they're hot *bad words*"
But then the inverse is also true, streams that are out to be toxic for views. Because lets be real, thats what draws the views.
-
@BlackMercury said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2132130#Comment_2132130
it's a chapter, meaning at minimum there is a killer. Most likely there's a killer and survivor, possibly there's a second survivor and possibly a map.
I dunno, all I seen what a big charm advertisement no survivors to be found. Let alone a disgusting killer yuck!
/s
-
@Lord_Tony said:
bro the killer is probably licker and he's gonna suck like trickster lol
There is no killer or survivor. Its just the charm. Please dont get our hopes up.
-
@glitchboi said:
Sluzzy vs. Lord_Tony be like
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/6TNZ3QBRML0F/image.png
C'mon, make it happen.
Im just convinced its the same person posting to themselves at this point.
-
@Jarol said:
Call me crazy, but I feel like the survivors of this episode will be Claire Redfield and Leon Kennedy. And that still does not know who it is, only that we know that Umbrella Corp is in the territory of the entity. But the cote message of "Kill or Die" is something that leaves me intrigued and it is obvious that the survivor is Claire, as he said at Christmas, "STARS" are coming as everything pointed to Resident Evil and in the end, destiny has been compliment. And Leon for? because in the teaser Felix is the victim and he has a certain resemblance to Leon. Maybe my vision can be true or false, but imagine being chased by Freddy Krueger being Leon Kennedy and Claire Redfield with a "No Place to Hide" music.
Just saying, Leon and Claire are not in S.T.A.R.S , that would be Jill and Chris you are thinking of. I really thinking the Survivor will 100% be Jill as she is so Iconic more so than Claire I would argue. Leon & Jill are the most Iconic if you as me.
-
I would like more locker perks since we only have Head On & Deception.
But your perk is essentially SB on demand when you are at a jungle gym with lockers. Sounds too good lol.
Combo it with QAQ + DWM and youd disappear into the fog.
-
Yes, and I'm sure the map randomiser is in on it too, the corn map always for me.
I bet the Matchmaking and Map Picker are having a good laugh bullying me.
-
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
IMAGINE saying the devs they cant tell you what is or is not cheating in their own game.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
-
Just Imagine it, Jill, Leon, Claire, Chris and Nemmy as the Killer. I'd think I was playing Resistance.
-
@lugZas_exe said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2115985#Comment_2115985
I don't think it was Felix, it was some other guy. Maybe Chris Redfield.
And why should Felix be in this Teaser ? He isn't Part of RE. He has nothing to do there.
The scream is Felix's scream. If you put them side by side it's the same. Its like how David was in the legion trailer instead of Jeff lol. It's also not the official teaser for the RE Chapter, I expect the real Teaser to show off more.
-
I'm mainly happy it wont be a lobby full of Kates, Nea and MegHeads.
Please! Bring on the Leons😍
-
@NomiNomad said:
I know nothing about RE, so I don't really care who gets in.
All I know is the voice in the teaser sounded definitively male. I don't know if it was an existing survivor, that's definitely possible, or whoever the new killer is.
Ada sounds cool tho
The Scream? That was Felix lol.
The only other voices I heard were the groans of what I assume were zombies?
-
Actually, the reason is because the Corn Map was not entirely finished, we were supposed to get that with All-Kill. I'm sure theres a tweet or somewhere saying that as the reason. I remember reading it. They did state that they wouldn't be adding more maps until the old ones are redone.
But I do think they would add a new map for RE since it is licensed. There's already so much hype they can't not put a new map in.
-
@RoboMojo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2115961#Comment_2115961
HEY! I will have you know that there’s AT LEAST 8 or 9 of us.
You're all such treasures, I want to protect you all from extinction.
-
Ah so this is where the 5 Jeff mains that are in the game hangout. So cute😍
-
@DerpyPlayz said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2114519#Comment_2114519
Why would people think it is only related to those RE games? Is there something I missed?
It could be a marketing strategy to promote the R8 games release as that is the franchise focus as of the moment.
R7 was incredibly well recieved and R8 has so much hype already, DBD would be a good way for Capcom and BHVR to scratch eachothers backs.
-
@justbecause said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2111009#Comment_2111009
That's contradictory a lil bit lol u said rank on surv doesn't matter but on killer does because u play against hard and skillful players and swf so how their rank doesn't matter if u struggle to beat them in red ranks when they are red ranks too, also would u say u struggle to win if u got matched with bunch of green rank survs? No u wouldn't u would wipe floor with them like any other red rank killer or surv in red ranks against green rank killer
Its not, because I was referring to Survivor Ranks and Killer Ranks as being different? There's no contradiction, please don't confuse yourself.
I need you to restructure what you're trying to say please, because I do not understand what comparison you're trying to make in that block of text of yours. A green rank killer can defeat red ranks as well, not all Red Ranks are a death squad as you seem to believe. As I stated before, when I play *SOLO SURVIVOR* I encounter Red Rank SURVIVORS that don't know how to play correctly. Meanwhile, majority of Killers that are Red Rank have the visible skill to back up their rank.
Please do not put words in my mouth and make assumptions as you have. Thankyou.
-
Ah, thanks so much, I got it done now. I must have been too trigger happy and moved earlier than I was supposed to.
-
I have other perks I like running. 🤔
I like using DH, Second Wind, SpineChill and BT. It's my preferred way to play. Kindred to me is always one of those "Wow that's cool they're running it!" perks, but personally I find games without it are the same as using it. Atleast with Kindred tho, you can all visibly see who is and isn't contributing at certain times 🙈
-
I don't think this will help much, people will just catch on to which mode is most popular at the time and flood to that.
-
I would want to play around the term insidious.
We should turn it into something that affects survivors the longer a match progresses? Or something like inflicting oblivious on survivors could be cool. I feel like the oblivious effect is not used alot.
-
Personally I use:
STBFL, Monitor, BBQ and Brutal. All the survivors just throw pallets at me and I feel like he needs it to catch up faster lol.
-
Is this the new advertising update I've been hearing about? Hmm..🤔