Avatar

Itooshie

Itooshie

About

Username
Itooshie
Joined
Visits
372
Last Active

Comments

  • It really is just a better together. And if the killer doesnt kick it you get it back instantly.

  • No drama here, also the drop rates seem alright? Ive gotten 1 cake in every web so far. Last web I had a Cake, flashlight and toolbox, maybe I was just god lucky?

  • @A_Skinny_Legend said:

    What? No, these past few updates have been so Iconic. If anything it's something to celebrate and be thankful for.

    Anyway, if doomsday ever does arrive for dbd then I have a proposition of changing the game into a shopping dating sim. It'll be called Alive by Moonlight.

    Finally my Dwight X David Fanfics can come true

  • @legacycolt said:

    didn’t get my crown after escaping with it and game crashes on Ps5 after every round. I’m speechless.

    You crashed on PS5? Thats the first ive ever heard of that. Something spicy is going on!

  • @Salty_Pearl said:

    So first off, apparently the game is already crashing and having major bugs on top of dealing with the same bugs from the RE chapter. RCPD just went live after 2 weeks of not being playable and console players can't even play the game with performance issues. I know the devs don't have control over bugs when things go live and I understand that they are probably under a lot of pressure and I do feel sympathy for them however, this happens almost every time there is a major update. While these are all incredibly frustrating issues this is not the reason why I think the event is a disappointment.

    It's because there absolutely no difference between this event and all the other events we have had in the past year or so. All the events have gone further and further down in quality. Events now are just "log in to get x reward." "gens and items change color and there's confetti again!" What happened to actual gameplay changes like the putrid serum? During the Hallowed Blight event, there was pustula plants that you had to collect serum from and escape (or in the Killer's case hook survivors) and would be able to use that as currency for event items. Another example are the community challenges like during the Summer BBQ which allowed you to get really cool cosmetics for doing challenges. I know there is a community challenge now but it isn't the same quality as the other one since it's the exact same design from the 4th year anniversary and now it's just on David and Wraith.

    I love DBD, truly I do. But I think we can all agree that the events and the game quality in general has gone downhill. I am in no way trying to attack anyone from BHVR as I am sure they are busy with 1000 things right now, but as a player since launch day, I just have to voice the problems that I am having with this game.

    I want more pustula pedals and lantern grabbing. But the community decided those were bad events and only wanted hooks and gens, no secondary objectived allowed. 😪

  • *Finally, now we can all play Valorant*

  • @Kaitsja said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2321272#Comment_2321272

    Do you have any idea how hard it is to obtain a next-gen console right now? So what, pray tell, are those of us on PS4/Xbox One with no way to upgrade supposed to do?

    We paid for the resident evil chapter, but performance is so bad they should just refund us. BHVR Got our money and in return we got performance issues because they clearly didn't test their update on consoles before it went live.

    They dont have to refund you because the DLC is not the issue at hand. Its something with the spaghetti code. That is to say, you buying or not buying the DLC would not have made a difference. Just saying.

    @JawsIsTheNextKiller said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2320582#Comment_2320582

    But do they care enough? Do they care enough to hire another couple of game testers? Do they care enough to hire a few extra coders to fix bugs? Do they care enough to buy an actual Playstation and boot the game up?

    I'm sure they care. Slightly.

    Do you have proof they dont? Personally I just think they are inept, and dont care for last gen anymore. They probably have a single PS5 and Xboxwhatever they use for a 5min test.

  • @SleepyWillo said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2320838#Comment_2320838

    It would be nice if BHVR actually answered us rather than us having to go through other companies.

    Dont know how these companies will feel with the influx of people that have/will be reaching out for clarification regarding this...

    #UnlinkTheSets

    I assume they just have stock replies they copy and paste then move on with their lives with. Assuming they even reply to everyone.

  • @v4lor said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2320606#Comment_2320606

    Simply, Konami has no creative input for how the characters appear in-game, only that they have the license to use said characters/names/locations/etc.

    This includes perks, their written DBD lore, their powers, and their cosmetics. It's why, for example, Cheryl can have an Xmas sweater despite it not being in any game, and similarly for PHead's sets. They are born from creative freedom BHVR has to use the characters as they choose. Which means they oh-so-creatively chose to force linked cosmetics, be it for greed or laziness (and not having to QA clipping with other pieces), and they pass their decision/laziness onto the consumer's wallet instead.

    It doesnt specifically state that tho, the language used is too broad for my tastes. Like I said before what they are saying can be twisted and used for different perspectives.

    I still am interpreting it as they have no imput on anything on DBD that is not silent hill licensed.


    Unless something more specific comes out, or a Mod can talk about these emails. Im not going to just blindly jump to anything atm. Not that any of this changes anything about things being sets.


    They arent going to just turn off sets anytime soon.

  • @v4lor said:

    https://twitter.com/edgy2000scheryl/status/1409951067106906114

    So now we know Cheryl's could be unlinked if BHVR wanted to, how many other characters does this apply to, hmm? How far down does the rabbit hole of "preserving a character's image" go?

    I cant beleive somebody went out of their way go ask Konami. Their response is kinda weird too.

    To me, that neither denies nor confirms anything.

    I read it as saying they have no input on DBD characters, or storylines or gameplay. Cheryl is not a DBD character, they said in their email she is a Konami license. So maybe im dumb but that email doesnt really ammount to anything regarding if they do or do not have a say over their license. It just says they cant speak for DBD characters, story or i guess gameplay.

    The email is so nonspecific you can literally twist it anyway you wanted to.

  • @Grimmy_Bluues said:

    How does a bugfix patch make the game run worse, either the code is so spaghetti that they don't know what to do or they just don't care.

    Obviously they care. They just dont know what to do. If they didnt care theyd never have acknowledged the problems in the first place.

  • @LylakLavender said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2319069#Comment_2319069

    Oh okay. I thought I seen on the forums that someone got banned for killing someone that had the pride charm. I stand corrected.

    It was just another ploy by people to winge about the charm 🙄

  • Again, I think the problem is you just cant meet everyones expectations and desires on how the character should be.

    Someone, somewhere is going to get annoyed by something. Because the LGBT+ is so insanly diverse in the first place.

    All I know is I would love a little subtlety, they dont need to be a fighting for rights kind of icon for me to feel represented. But also, who even reads the bios and lore. Its all so long now. 😷

    In other news I feel like it should be a male atleast, or FtoM. I feel like LGBT Males are so hard to come by. Seems its easier for the world to accept Females/Lesbians or something 👀COUGH LiS/LoU2 COUGH

    I dunno, im just a young gay boy watching the forum burn everytime this gets brought up🙃

  • @KSzerker said:

    I wouldn't praise them just yet. The cakes last year didn't stack (but gave 140% instead of 104%) for 10 days.

    If these cakes stack 150% I will praise them like nobody else. Imagine the BP

  • Another Plague Main here, but I dont care for tier lists or anything. She is just fun to play and alot of my matches go really well with her. 🥺


    But god does she feel high risk low reward somtimes. Not to mention I know when my puke misses it would 110% hit me as a survivor

  • @FregglesFred said:

    Eh, it's about time they listen for once. They don't get my praise.

    What do you mean listen? This was always going to be a thing. Even the leaker admitted that.

  • @kisfenkin said:

    Something I don't see being pointed out. They very clearly said, "During the Anniversary Event." Does that mean the leaks that they wouldn't stack are all about after the event ends?

    I assume its just because you can only get cakes in your bloodweb during the event period. Not that it gets deactivated as an offering.

    ------------

    Now what can we shout at the devs for next? Delete spirit please. /s

  • Only a few interesting ones.

    GF = Shyguy

    The Twinkster

    Demo = Demi Lavato

  • I thought we lost our items and offerings, thats whay happened last night to my BPS when the killer DCd


    I feel like its preferred that nobody DCs ever 🤷‍♂️

  • @Aquitus said:

    @miketheratguy that might be true for the copyrighted survivors but you cant mix-and-match for BHVR original characters either! and there are also locked sets that have nothing to do with non-BHVR copyrights like the Christmas pajamas! which company is blocking that?

    Regardless of if you think it should be mixable or not. The devs made them linked sets. Thats the end of discussion.

    I agree some of them are questionable and would be fine unlinked. But the Devs have stayed firm on linked sets and that wont change any time soon.

    They knew about the bug/glitch and did not punish anybody for performing it. But at the end of the day, breaking the sets was never intended and it was going to be fixed eventually.

  • I dont play alot of killer, because im bad at killer. I get to purple rank and them im just trying to do challenges.

    I play a lot of survivor which is super casual tbh. Hmu on monster hunter sometime, I love that game.

  • This would actually be really sad if its true. He had such a perfect voice. Id rather not know and assume hes still alive tbh ahaha😅

  • @Pulsar said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2304414#Comment_2304414

    They were advertised as being non-sets.

    When people bought them, BHVR changed them to be linked, which means you'd be spending money on a set that doesn't change the head of the Survivor

    Yeah I already know that. I was arguing the injustice last week when it was released. But I dont think they were "advertised" there was a leak that said theyd be non-linked. Then BHVR made a statement saying they were always intended to be linked. As per Capcoms contract.


    If im wrong, please find me the "advertisement" as them being non-linked.

    @Luigifan64 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2304414#Comment_2304414

    How? I wasn't able to use the whole set, and even then, they lost even MORE money now that they gave me cells back for it. Because I sure as HELL am not buying those awful skins back.

    From my uderstanding they'd rather just get the whole price from somebody who would buy it than somebody who only paid 4$ which is dumb but what can you do 🤷‍♂️

    Now you can spend those cells on something else atleast.

  • @Luigifan64 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2304340#Comment_2304340

    They refunded me for the outfits when I NEVER wanted them refunded.

    Thats really sad. But I can understand why, they lost money letting you keep it.

  • Is he F tier because he cant cope with SWF?

    When playing solo Q the ammount of smooth brains that jump in his traps are amazing.

    But I really agree with your points. Especially the sack basekit. Its so dumb only being able to hold one trap .🙄

    Trap spawns need to be looked at also, cosnsidering they can spawn in the corner of the damn maps sometimes.

  • @Luigifan64 said:

    And now they stole my Leon and Jill sets when I NEVER wanted or asked for a refund. Never buying them back either, not about to pay $4 for Jill's ######### DEFAULT headpiece or Leon's AWFUL slightly longer hair. It really sucks too because I loved that Leon jacket, just goes to show how ######### they are, pulling no punches this patch.

    What do you mean they stole? As in it got reset or totally refunded?

  • @GeneralV said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2304003#Comment_2304003

    I think what we actually are good events, such as the ones we had in the past: Howling Grounds, Scorching Summer BBQ, All Hallows' Eve, Winter Solstice, and this beautiful list goes on.

    What defines a good event? Because those events were just gens and hooks being pretty with extra BP.


    I want more interactive events like the Blight and Moonrise. Finding the Gnome at ECG now that stuff is fun.

  • @TWiXT said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2303725#Comment_2303725

    Fun Idea but in practice the Player controlled Zombies would just do everything they can to body block the killer so their buddies could escape the match.

    Tbh if im dead I would 100% screw over my SWF lmaoo

  • @[Deleted User] said:

    could be worse. could be genshin.

    a gacha game that thrives on milking people for all they're worth (as in, hundreds if not thousands of dollars) for characters/weapons/resin that also decided to price their limited time skin for a character that's not even guaranteed ever at $30. with other forms of monetization like the battlepass & monthly currency sub.

    I will say the legendary skins are overpriced though.

    Ugh yes. The gacha is one thing that im well accustomed to, but the recent Jean skin is absolutely pathetic.

    They made the event skin looking so much better by comparison.


    The only drama I have with skins on DBD is that the ones I always want are never purchaseable with shards. I think skins in fortnite are more expensive, and OW skins are all stuck behind loot boxes. 🙄

  • Pack it up guys. The secrets out. BHVR is bankrupt now that these gamers know😪

  • @shadowwings8810 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2303837#Comment_2303837

    Well it sounds like jane and kate were your mains while mine is nea. But I already figured they weren't going to change it. Just gonna pay some respects to the glitch.

    Thank you all for lending an ear, just needed to get that off my chest. Hopefully, all of the other issues can be resolved.

    Now excuse me while I go contemplate my life in the shower.

    Im actually just a Jane main. Kates are... an interesting breed.

    But Nea has a million better cosmetics that dont give a smooth head or missing limbs

  • > Smooth head Nea.

    > Missing torso.

    "WHY DID THEY MAKE IT A LINKED SET"

    If you were to say Janes head, or Kates floral crown I would totally agree wjth you.

    Even weapons from killer sets are a bit of a grey area.

    But at the end if the day, they are not going to budge on this as is evident with the mass complaints and threads getting ignored.

  • God that Nea head is so ugly without a hood.🤢🤢🤮

    And the hood just looks Janky with her other hairs.

  • Yeah, I wish during the downtime patches we could select which oned we have. The last MidPatch had nothing Unique from memory.

    I love the trickster music.

  • God knows this will be a toxic mess. Never do it please BHVR.

  • @JFF said:

    If they could do it with older licenses, why not with the new ones? I believe it has little to do with licensing itself, but rather it's done to prevent certain parts of the cosmetics from clipping. In the end they're losing money, because sometimes I only like specific part of the set and since you can't buy separate parts, I won't buy it, simple as that.

    Different companies mean different attitudes. Its all really confusing, I can understand why Konami can be hard arses about their products, but Capcom is known for being pretty goofy. But whatever their decision is thats what BHVR has to follow

  • It saddens me that nobody mentioned the Plague.

    The Demise of the Thotful chapter will always be my fave DLC. It gave me both Jane and The Plague who I main.

    Although once I hit purple ranks I just stop playing killer because it's too much for me and I'm a terrible terrible terrible killer.

  • Most streamers are all pretty chill I know a few small ones that I have fallen in love with when vsing them in DBD.

    The only streamers I dont like are ones that dont want to admit they played poorly, survivor or killer. The god complex some people can have is insane.

  • No you're wrong, the community is aware, they know. They just don't care, because it doesn't suit their wants.

    We also need to keep pushing the narrative that the Devs dont care about the game, they're money hungry and are killer sided... Anything else to add to the list these days.😒

  • @Crowman said:

    I imagine licensed link sets are part of the license contract so there's likely a vested interest in making sure sets can't be broken in order to keep good standing with license holders.

    Its all linked sets, not just the legendary sets

  • Ugh They reset my Jane and now Ive lost my Goddess Hair. What a great hotfix.

  • I feel like the BP grind is not that bad if you know which survivor you want to main. Its been said before, they are all skins. When you decide to P3 and get every single perk I guess thats where it hits you hard? But being P3 is just a choice that doesnt make much of a difference anyway, it's just to show off.

    Just choose a survivor you like and play as them. Unlock meta perks or whatever but keep your main fed with BP. Between the shards you can use to get BP and the tome challenges there's a lot of BP to be made. Compared to how it was before, getting perks is a bit easier, when you could only get one perk per BP level, Christ, that was a grind.

  • I consider a win, not feeling like deleting my game after the match 🤷

  • @Laluzi said:

    Let's survey the damage.

    -Raccoon City Police Department disabled

    -Temple of Purgation disabled

    -Frequent crashes

    -Console experiencing debilitating stuttering and freezing

    -Glitched window vaults

    -Hindered status effect completely broken, taking Clown down with it

    -A paid cosmetic that's the exact same as the default

    Am I missing anything?

    Sorry, hindered entirely?

    I thought it was *just* clowns bottles

  • @FrndlyChnswSalzmn said:

    Disagree. Don't get cornered. Pay attention. use your eyes and ears.

    Ah, sorry I didnt use my Xray eyes to see through the walls and notice the zombie walking to block off the doorway 🤧

  • Im still curious as to why a refund is the solution here?

    What makes you think im going to refund the cosmetic? I now have a fullset for 1/3 of the price since im locked into using it all now anyway.

    I think most people will just keep the whole thing anyway and not use it. 🙄

  • @GoodBoyKaru said:

    Well I did a little digging for you, OP.

    Section 74.05 of the Competition Act states that it's illegal to sell a product above it's advertised price. Nothing about if it can or can't be on sale and when.

    Subsections 74.01(2) and 74.01(3) of the Competition Act "prohibit the making, or the permitting of the making, of any materially false or misleading representation, to the public, as to the ordinary selling price of a product, in any form whatever". Basically, you can't mislead or allow others to mislead the public on the RRP- Regular Retail Price.

    The "ordinary selling price" can be decided in 2 ways. There's the volume test- if the supplier has sold "a substantial volume of the product was sold at that price or a higher price, within a reasonable period of time"- and the time test- where "the product was offered for sale, in good faith, for a substantial period of time at that price or a higher price".

    It has nothing to do with having a product be discounted, only that you cannot sell it above the usual price.

    I'm no expert in Canadian law, so if there's someone who is please do correct me because I'd love to know more, however I don't think it's illegal to have a sale on items put together in a bundle, as has been the case for the entire store, ever.

    Nice try, though.

    The hero we dont deserve 🥲💖

  • Ah Sphaggeti code. Mamma Mia.

    Touch one thing break another.

1 2 3 4