Seanzu
Seanzu
About
- Username
- Seanzu
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,629
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Detective_Jonathan said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/391062#Comment_391062
Or maybe it's just a waste of time? Because now it's going to clog up the forums with all the "Ash is coming to be DBD" hype threads, This is nothing new sweetheart.
What are you talking about? lmfao.
Making one thread for people to talk about it should hopefully mean less threads are made.
Take your grudge elsewhere.
-
@Delfador said:
God damn it I was maining Jane and I have to grind harder for Ash.
I fcking love Ash, I actually can't wait for the Ash avatar for this forum lmao.
I've never watched the show maybe i will now.
-
@Detective_Jonathan said:
What is their to discuss, we practically discussed everything when the new perks were leaked, and knew what was coming.
Maybe this thread isn't for you then, honey.
-
and the trailer features the actual actor, too.
Super impressed.
-
@Kagrenac said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/390995#Comment_390995
Yeah that's true. I just believe a lot of paranoid theory crafting happens on here.
Yea it's a
What if they're running this, this, this, this, this, this, this... etc.
-
@Kagrenac said:
I'm excited, I love Evil Dead!
Mettle of Man is whatever it's not as much of a problem as people think.
Flip Flop on the other hand...that's going to be a major issue in my opinion. Itll certainly stop slugging. May be the best anti slug perk in the game that isn't no mither.
I think one of the biggest issues this game has is the "what ifs". If a new perk comes out, you can't run it without removing a different "meta" perk. and people like to make out that every build is happening all it once, it seems.
If they aren't running flip flop, then they wont be running something else, etc etc.
-
So it's likely the perks we saw were their final version, interesting to see what people think about mettle of man and if it'll actually affect gameplay all that much.
Only time will tell.
-
Oh this guy is still posting lame wins on the forums? lmfao.
Attention needed, everyone hug him.
-
@Bravo0413 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/374767#Comment_374767
For once you and I agree on something... people are overreacting like something crazy on this perk... I will gladly except this perk into the game... with this perk you could get that Old BT back but actually at a risk and the cost of 2 slots... I love it!
Honestly, I'm sorry but I have multiple chases where I've missed a hit on survivor, and you get that mini cool down thing, it's literally just that, once in the entire match, and then once they heal, you can see their aura until you down them, then the perk deactivates completely.
It's literally a trash perk lmao.
Pros
You can take one additional hit.
Cons
Once Per Trial
Killer Sees Your Aura Until You're Down (If you heal)
Additionally, you could die before you use it, you've probably already been hooked once before you even use it.
more crying for the sake of crying.
-
@NoShinyPony said:
@SenzuDuck Haven't seen you in quite some time. Welcome back.
Anyway, I don't think it's crying about just anything. A missed hit from the killer can definitively save a surv. This perks sounds too powerful for my taste.
Except, it's unreleased, unnannounced & there's pretty big negatives to it.
Works once per trial? People talking about chaining it with dead hard which is by far the easiest perk in the game to counter.
ridiculous arguments once again.
-
This thread honestly just goes to show how one side will cry about anything.
Lets cry about perks that aren't even released yet alone announced officially.
The perk is weak holy heck, one hit that doesn't do damage, because you've never swung at a window and got nothing out of it right, it's basically like that except you connect.
-
DS is being changed, talk about beating a dead horse.
-
@se05239 said:
You still get the points if the killer DCs. It an UI related issue.
You don't get the 5K escape points as far as I know. I could be wrong but I've never noticed getting an extra 5K when a killer DCs
-
@se05239 said:
There's a reason I call people who get easily excited for skins "cattle". They don't see the problem with $10 dollar skins and will happily purchase anything new Behavior pump out.
It's the same sort of people who pre-order AAA games, or buy "Deluxe" editions or other ######### that turned the gaming industry into such a garbage dump.
I've put 3K hours into this game and have got more entertainment out of it than any other game.
Damn right i'm going to shovel money into their mouths so I get more content out of it.
I've got MORE enjoyment than I've paid for that's a fact.
-
@HeroLives said:
I mean since the cosmetics they’ve started pumping out more dlcs, updating the engine, and are getting dedicated servers. Coincidence? I think not.
i agree though they are a tad pricey when they first drop, I think they could double their income by dropping outfits to $5 a piece.
Doesn't matter, these people demand free stuff because the game has bugs, as common folk (players) we must batten down the hatches and work together to be stinger & more beggar like. /s
If you want a skin, earn it or buy it. You can even get more of the DLC through play time now, if that isn't enough then you REALLY should find something else to play, honestly.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
Remember The 80s Suitcase DLC? That gave you twenty uncommon cosmetic peices for only around $2.99.
By the current cosmetic store’s standards, twenty uncommon cosmetic peices would cost $20.00 (one uncommon cosmetic peice costs 100AC / $1.00).
It takes about half the price of The 80s Suitcase DLC to buy one twentieth of its content in the current cosmetic store.
Do we see the problem here?
No? Isn't the 80s pack pretty much just a recolour of the survivors current clothing?
The new outfits are all different models and the 10$ gets you three pieces for an entire outfit.
I'd be interested if the devs would answer the question "would dedicated servers even be on the table without the current store pricing".
-
When the camping penalty was introduced it came with the caveat that if a survivor is also within 16m of the hook you wont suffer the penalty, I assume it has been unchanged, so if there is someone close there will be no penalty incurred.
-
@scorpio said:
Her mori is way too long too. I wish the devs would consider how much time is wasted during a mori animation when creating them. The length of the Pig’s should be the standard.
Yea, that's the whole point?
Lmao "I want my effortless kills to be instant thanks BHVR".
If you want to run mori's deal with the extra time you waste doing the animation, as opposed to the two extra hooks you'd have to go through, seems fair to me.
-
All you have to do is report on the end game screen, reporting ensures that a chat log is saved and sent to the moderator team.
-
Starbreeze is no longer affiliated with Behavior or Dead By Daylight so I find it incredibly hard to believe.
Also, even if it was true, why would it matter?
-
@shinymon said:
So just to be clear it won't count as "farming" if the survivors decide to fool around with me? The other match I was the hag and doing nothing but laying down traps by the open gates with the other survivors playing along. They could have escaped any time they wanted to.
Farming isn't bannable as long as you're not forcing anyone to do so.
an example would be continuously chasing someone, picking them up and dropping them constantly so you can re-chase or trying to force them to do gens etc.
-
-
@ClogWench said:
Master said:@Yamaoka said:
So you're struggling against people who can't even hit great skillchecks? 🤔
Were you struggling against killers that dribbled you every time and wasted a huge of time?
@ClogWench said:
Gentapping still slows it down. Isn't that Ruins purpose? Why remove it
Dribbling wasted lots of time aswell, still it got removed
Dribbling wasted a very small amount of time, and is being removed because of the DS Rework. Why would they get rid of gentapping?
It's ridiculous, right? They got rid of the reason you feel the need to dribble, which is fine they made DS way weaker imo.
It's really annoying seeing people try and equate things all the time, llike survivors crying about noed when it isn't nearly the same as NOED.
Now dribbling isn't a thing because they heavily nerfed the reason it exists and now they want rid of gen tapping, it's insane.
-
I know you're not asking about the killer but I'm seriously hoping for a double Female DLC drop.
They're severely lacking on both sides and it's a bit of a shame. -
If it’s end game you’re probably camping if you can’t hit a survivor running at your hook twice then that’s your problem tbh.The_Crusader said:
Depends man.SenzuDuck said:
Down the unhooker that doesn’t have the chance to use it then?The_Crusader said:
A good number of people take it now.SenzuDuck said:Except if they don’t have DS? People come up with these theories and base them on if everyone in the match is running it.
Many people who dont use it have said they intend to use it when the changes come in.
What do you do? Slug and assume they have it? Or pick then up and risk the stun?
I'd bet money this perk becomes even more widely used after the changes.
Who unhooks while injured? Nobody. You gotta hope the unhooker can't make it to the exit gates before you can hit them twice.
Then there is the kobe/Deliverance. -
I find killer incredibly easy tbh.
I get a heck tonne more points out of it too.
It's very enjoyable.
-
@Meme said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Milkymalk said:
@TheMidnightRidr said:
I promise you that if SWF was taken out of the game, DBD would die.You DO realize that for its first few months, there was no SWF and at some time survivors would lobby-dodge until they wound up in the same game as their friends? SWF was introduced to stop that. Until then, there was no SWF mode. The game was balanced around being isolated.
No it wasn't, they stated a few streams ago when they released they only had time to do KYF or SWF, and they opted for KYF.
Stop spreading misinformation - SWF was always intended.
what wasn't intended is player being so poor at the game that they can't handle it.
Yep,because swf CLEARLY doesn't give any advantage to the survivors.
I bet you're the kind of guy to call a team of solo players SWF.
-
The game will never be scary for veteran players.
I wish people would stop making suggestions based on trying to make the game "scary" it just wont happen.
Make suggestions and give good reasons for them.
Sure you might jump at myers pulling you off a gen but most people jump at unexpected things happening.
-
@MhhBurgers said:
True with his no NOED stance is really pretentious, if he doesn't like 1hit downs he also shouldnt play bubba or billy. Other than that he's fun to watch.Ardetha is impossible to watch, so cocky and with really cringy oneliners.
Monto is great
Marth is way to cocky.
I like RunningMan, Senzuduck is also entertaining to watch.
Noob3 is great too nowadays.
Runningman is honestly a legend. Rarely get to play against him but it's always fun.
-
@ClogWench said:
SenzuDuck said:@ClogWench said:
NOED punishes genrush. That's why people hate it.
It also rewards camping.
I don't use NOED but when killers camp they say to do gens, when you do gen too fast and you get hit by NOED they say to do totems.
If you don't gen rush with a camping killer someone will die and another person will be camped.
I don't have an issue with noed but lets not pretend it doesn't reward really scummy camping gameplay and punish survivors who are being smart against campers.
Do gens and totems. No matter what it's always avoidable.
No it's not.
Doing Gens & Finding all the totems before the camped survivor dies is a big ask, you either do all the gens the survivor dies and the killer gets to camp another with NOED or You do the gens, and the totems by the time thats done the killer is on his second.
-
@Cardgrey said:
Ask yourself this say god picks u up. and drops u into a random location and says. do 5 gens and I'll open the gates to let u out. Be aware I've also added a person for my amusement who job is to kill u...
Do u a do gens and GTFO of there
Or do u wander around looking and exploring idk about u but I know what I'd doBut it's a video game with 0 IRL consequences.
-
@ClogWench said:
NOED punishes genrush. That's why people hate it.It also rewards camping.
I don't use NOED but when killers camp they say to do gens, when you do gen too fast and you get hit by NOED they say to do totems.
If you don't gen rush with a camping killer someone will die and another person will be camped.
I don't have an issue with noed but lets not pretend it doesn't reward really scummy camping gameplay and punish survivors who are being smart against campers.
-
Down the unhooker that doesn’t have the chance to use it then?The_Crusader said:
A good number of people take it now.SenzuDuck said:Except if they don’t have DS? People come up with these theories and base them on if everyone in the match is running it.
Many people who dont use it have said they intend to use it when the changes come in.
What do you do? Slug and assume they have it? Or pick then up and risk the stun?
I'd bet money this perk becomes even more widely used after the changes.
-
Except if they don’t have DS? People come up with these theories and base them on if everyone in the match is running it.
-
@BACKSTABBER said:
Is trash, easy to counter, just count mentally 1 minute after unhooks with suspicious survsWorst is u can't control when to shoot DS, I used todo before 3rd or 2nd hook, now so trash when killer wants or not
What?
-
Because for some reason, despite it being 100% avoidable they keep comparing it to current d-strike which is absolutely crazy to me.
Survivors mains complaining about 70 seconds worth of totems to do boo hoo
-
@Lanis_ said:
ANOTHER SURVIVOR NERF? please stop.. in the last year every patch has a survivor nerf or killer buff (except for Mending) #########?!?It's a perk change to balance it, it isn't a nerf to survivors at all.
There are plenty of people who do just fine without it.
-
@Condorloco_26 said:
I don't see my question answered... does anyone know if a survivor will be able to "save" their DS by not hitting the skill check for a posterior unhook??Here you go bud.
Theres a QA under the original blog post if you wanna go check it out.
-
@The_Crusader said:
SenzuDuck said:@The_Crusader said:
Hex_Flex said:
@The_Crusader said: Blueberry said:
Imo the timer for how long it's active to be used after unhooking is too long. If you're seriously getting tunneled that hard, a much lower timer will be effective. At 60 seconds I could literally make it across the map, down and hook someone else, then come back to find them again and they are still in that 60 second window to get the DS on me. That scenario isn't a tunnel and I get punished. I like the change, just lower the timer some so that it really is JUST an anti-tunnel perk, not an immunity for a minute perk. Yeah this is what I thought too. If you haven't been hit by around 30-40 seconds then you aren't being tunneled. 10 seconds to run away from the hook. 16 seconds to be healed, 32 if you self-care which barely anyone does after an unhook. 20/30/40 seconds would be plenty of time. Hell even 30/40/50.
If you dont see anyone and stumble across a survivor within those 60 seconds you could be punished gor unintentional tunneling. Id like to think the 60 seconds is for anti-slugging measures to an extent. If you tunnel somebody with the new D/S off a hook and down them, you need to wait to counter the perk. If it was only 10 seconds that would be kinda garbage, if i was pig i would just t-bag you for 10 seconds and then hook you as i laugh at your wasted perk.
Yeah 10 is too short I agree, I just think 60 is a bit too long. Anyone who's intentionally tunneling wont be trying to hook a survivor 60 seconds later.
I think it's fine at 60, any lower and the killer will sit and wait every time before hooking imo.
60 is a nice time because while a killer could wait out the timer a lot of other things will be done by survivors, any less and it's safe for the killer to wait it out if you know what i mean.
I don't think any killer would wait for the full 40. I just feel theres enoigh leway in 60 seconds for it to be exploitable.
You have killers who face camp, an additional x amount of seconds wont really matter too much to them.
but 60 seconds is far less encouraging to do it than a shorter timer.
-
@The_Crusader said:
Hex_Flex said:@The_Crusader said:
Blueberry said:
Imo the timer for how long it's active to be used after unhooking is too long. If you're seriously getting tunneled that hard, a much lower timer will be effective. At 60 seconds I could literally make it across the map, down and hook someone else, then come back to find them again and they are still in that 60 second window to get the DS on me. That scenario isn't a tunnel and I get punished. I like the change, just lower the timer some so that it really is JUST an anti-tunnel perk, not an immunity for a minute perk. Yeah this is what I thought too. If you haven't been hit by around 30-40 seconds then you aren't being tunneled. 10 seconds to run away from the hook. 16 seconds to be healed, 32 if you self-care which barely anyone does after an unhook. 20/30/40 seconds would be plenty of time. Hell even 30/40/50.
If you dont see anyone and stumble across a survivor within those 60 seconds you could be punished gor unintentional tunneling.
Id like to think the 60 seconds is for anti-slugging measures to an extent. If you tunnel somebody with the new D/S off a hook and down them, you need to wait to counter the perk. If it was only 10 seconds that would be kinda garbage, if i was pig i would just t-bag you for 10 seconds and then hook you as i laugh at your wasted perk.
Yeah 10 is too short I agree, I just think 60 is a bit too long. Anyone who's intentionally tunneling wont be trying to hook a survivor 60 seconds later.
I think it's fine at 60, any lower and the killer will sit and wait every time before hooking imo.
60 is a nice time because while a killer could wait out the timer a lot of other things will be done by survivors, any less and it's safe for the killer to wait it out if you know what i mean.
-
@Orion said:
@SenzuDuck said:
Yep, well done lads, talking ######### to new users congratulations aren't you just the greatest welcoming committee.I confuse Kate with Laurie all the time (in my head, but only once or twice on the forum). I genuinely thought it was funny to find someone else who does it too.
You're not stupid though so you can see how it looks.
-
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@CrimsonTyd79 said:
Once again you're making it harder on the survivors and making it easier for killers. This makes me regret buying Laurie to get decisive strike.You went through the effort of creating an accoutn to write this? lul
@Orion said:
@Master said:
@CrimsonTyd79 said:
Once again you're making it harder on the survivors and making it easier for killers. This makes me regret buying Laurie to get decisive strike.You went through the effort of creating an accoutn to write this? lul
Initially, it said "Kate" instead of "Laurie". It was hilarious.
Yep, well done lads, talking ######### to new users congratulations aren't you just the greatest welcoming committee.
Thanks, I will always trashtalk trashtalkers. If they want to have a reasonable conversation, then they need to bring up reasonable arguments.
having a different opinion isn't trash talking, it's an opinion, so they aren't wrong you just disagree with them, how about becoming an adult and having a conversation with them instead. They've done nothing to you.
-
@Master said:
@CrimsonTyd79 said:
Once again you're making it harder on the survivors and making it easier for killers. This makes me regret buying Laurie to get decisive strike.You went through the effort of creating an accoutn to write this? lul
@Orion said:
@Master said:
@CrimsonTyd79 said:
Once again you're making it harder on the survivors and making it easier for killers. This makes me regret buying Laurie to get decisive strike.You went through the effort of creating an accoutn to write this? lul
Initially, it said "Kate" instead of "Laurie". It was hilarious.
Yep, well done lads, talking ######### to new users congratulations aren't you just the greatest welcoming committee.
-
@scorpio said:
I like everything except the obsession changing because for something like Dying Light if you already killed the obsession, are they alive now? I don’t understand how that will work.Maybe we could tag @not_Queen & @Patricia_BHVR & @McLean to see if they can clarify on if it changes or not.
-
@BigBadPiggy said:
SenzuDuck said:@BigBadPiggy said:
SenzuDuck said:
@BigBadPiggy said: This whole post is accusing everyone. Your title is literally "PERKS AND ADDONS BEING HIDDEN IS NO LONGER USEFUL" How is it no longer useful? It's useful for 99% of matches. It's more than useful, infact. Also - Yea, you should be bringing this to the attention of the devs but to talk about it in the general section of a forum is ridiculous. You're bringing awareness of it to everyone else BUT the devs. I do like your excuse of checking hack forums on the regular though, that's nice. “I do like your excuse of checking hack forums on the regular though” Where did I say I regularly visit hack forums? I would really like to know where you see that. ”This whole post is accusing everyone.”
(Accuse: (Verb) claim that (someone) has done something wrong.) I’m not accusing anyone.
Your title by definition is accusing people "No longer useful".
If I gave you the question, "why is it no longer useful?" You'd say something along the lines of "Because people are using it".
No, you THINK people are using it, you're ACCUSING people of using it, and by saying "no longer" you're accusing everyone by saying this.
It's only no longer useful if everyone is using it, and I highly doubt that.
Maybe more are using it now that you've made this post about it.
“Maybe more are using it now that you’ve made a post about it.” Now THAT is an accusation, well done.
Then maybe I should rename the title to “Exploit in hiding killer perks needs to be fixed.” Would that work? Would that make you happy? Even though you are the only one complaining about this this heavily.
I mean i used the word maybe, but I'm not the one pretending I'm not accusing people, but way to ignore the entirety of my comment to nit-pick at something I'm not trying to defend, lol.
Maybe not make the post on a public forum at all and send it to the devs through a ticket that seems like the appropriate action.
-
No, it's fine.
There's people who have thousands of hours, and had they had the possibility to unlock those characters they'd have got them all for free.
You're not "supposed" to earn them. If it's too easy to earn them then people wont buy them.
-
@BigBadPiggy said:
SenzuDuck said:@BigBadPiggy said:
This whole post is accusing everyone.
Your title is literally
"PERKS AND ADDONS BEING HIDDEN IS NO LONGER USEFUL"
How is it no longer useful? It's useful for 99% of matches.
It's more than useful, infact.
Also - Yea, you should be bringing this to the attention of the devs but to talk about it in the general section of a forum is ridiculous. You're bringing awareness of it to everyone else BUT the devs.
I do like your excuse of checking hack forums on the regular though, that's nice.
“I do like your excuse of checking hack forums on the regular though” Where did I say I regularly visit hack forums? I would really like to know where you see that.
”This whole post is accusing everyone.”
(Accuse: (Verb) claim that (someone) has done something wrong.) I’m not accusing anyone.
Your title by definition is accusing people "No longer useful".
If I gave you the question, "why is it no longer useful?" You'd say something along the lines of "Because people are using it".
No, you THINK people are using it, you're ACCUSING people of using it, and by saying "no longer" you're accusing everyone by saying this.
It's only no longer useful if everyone is using it, and I highly doubt that.
Maybe more are using it now that you've made this post about it.
-
@BigBadPiggy said:
This whole post is accusing everyone.
Your title is literally
"PERKS AND ADDONS BEING HIDDEN IS NO LONGER USEFUL"
How is it no longer useful? It's useful for 99% of matches.
It's more than useful, infact.Also - Yea, you should be bringing this to the attention of the devs but to talk about it in the general section of a forum is ridiculous. You're bringing awareness of it to everyone else BUT the devs.
I do like your excuse of checking hack forums on the regular though, that's nice.
-
I'll bet that 95% of people don't check those kinds of forums and you're just bringing more attention to it.
It's honestly gross how you're just assuming everyone is cheating by saying "hiding perks is now useless". I'll bet that majority of people you go against don't give a single heck or even think about cheating.
But sure, paint everyone under the same brush because YOU went to a forum and saw it.
-
I think if you're playing at rank one the majority of the time you "Should" need addons.
If you're supposedly playing against the best and never needed addons to compete then that would point towards the idea that addons are just OP anyway.
And the whole "addons built in" malarky is silly. It's not that these addons should be "built in" it's that the killers should just have had that as base.
The wraith doesn't have "swift hunt" built in, it was just the best way for devs to describe what they were doing. They agreed that to make him stronger and more enjoyable to play he should have the speed coming out of cloak.