ProfoundEnding
ProfoundEnding
About
- Username
- ProfoundEnding
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,577
- Last Active
Comments
-
@CaulDrohn said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/291340/bubba-s-blackface-cosmetic-needs-to-be-removed
Where is your proof that it "is used 10x more"?
Where is your proof that it is used more "purely for the fact that it's black"?
How do you know that "players are specifically using it above the others and targeting people playing the black characters"?
How do you know that it's used "as a revenge for Claudette being ‘stealthy’"?
All you are doing is making wild assumptions about the killers intention.
It's not just them. Several users on Twitter are upset about it as well. Including POCs. And if you're not a POC, you're (according to them) not allowed to have an opinion on the subject. Or at the very least your opinion shouldn't be taken into consideration.
-
@cannonballB said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2580683#Comment_2580683
Oh Now Wally, Gimme A Bag Of That Effing Pig Feed
Lol
-
You're a dirty birdy.
-
Looks like it's just the icons that we keep. Probably will be less confusing if the names are the same for everyone honestly.
-
Not a Steam player so best I can do is 2017 take it or leave it 😎
-
@Chilli_man2400 said:
I play on Xbox so I’m not worried. But I am at the same time cause almost half then playerbase will die
We played against Xbox players just fine for 2 years, we can continue to do that if we lose PC.
-
Identity V has it. It would be nice.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
They could probably never get the likeness rights for sally hardesty because she's dead. I think kate denson is inspired by her though.
Even if they can't make her look 100% like the actress, they could change it a little like they did with Laurie.
Or I believe family is allowed to give permission to use a deceased loved ones likeness.
-
Unless the entity gives him the power to walk I dont think that's happening lol
-
@Nicholas said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2535056#Comment_2535056
Thank you for that and the insight. I'm glad the feedback matters to Bvhr and look forward to the event. I love exclusives and limited edition content, so I hope to see more, not less of that. Just keep it exclusive! It's really cool when things say "you had to be there" rather than everyone having everything.
Unfortunately, Dead by Daylight is not the game to get invested in exclusives with. BHVR has made it very clear they do not like exclusives. And currently the only actual exclusive content is Legacy and Rift charms. And even the charms I can see being released in the future once/if they ever update the store to include charms.
All Rift outfits eventually release into the store, and I really wouldn't get your hopes up for anything to ever be exclusive, especially after BHVR have voiced their dislike on exclusivity.
-
Everyone is just making jokes but I'm serious. All our women aren't below the age of 30. So much for diversity. And I'm 90% this new survivor is young too. 🙄
-
I hate airports.
-
@Kira4Evr said:
His new outfit just proves that linked sets don't make any sense. Like, why is his a linked set, but not Elodies???
Because they use the belt to separate the pieces. All other linked dresses extend beyond the waist, which causes those holes in the torso when people tried to mix and match them.
-
Maybe they just forgot? I'm sure they'll fix it soon.
-
@Mooks said:
Because 2-piece-sets are not a thing (as of now)
maybe they will add this in the future and unlink certain sets that make sense for this. But as of now this doesn’t seem possible..
look at it this way: if it wasn’t for set cosmetics you wouldn’t have gotten the pants either.
If it's not a thing, then they shouldn't have announced sets as being 2-3 linked cosmetics. Because they clearly had intentions for it but never utilized it.
-
Yui's voice. I'm sorry but it does NOT fit her appearance or character. The voice actor did a good job, it just needs to be attached to another character.
Yui is a hardened street racer, not some cute little anime girl.
-
@crowbarman said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2506703#Comment_2506703
I dont see anything remotely close in the forum rules saying it cant be discussed.
It's against the rules to discuss leaks/datamined information. The SBMM requirements were found in the game files, and several threads have already been deleted when talking about that information. That's probably what they're referring to.
-
@EntitySpawn said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2507725#Comment_2507725
Get about half the games in if not less due to lobby times, the matchmaking is awful even more so than usual. I'm sure on the weekend it was kinda fast but on off peak time week days the games pretty dead and it's the only time I get on
Well at the most you'll only have to wait until Tuesday. Unless they decide to push the patch to today for everyone else.
-
Why can't you play? My boyfriend is on next gen and he was getting games last night.
-
Yun-Jin's is a million times better then that ugly mess she got last time. I seriously don't know how that outfit even got past the drawing board, who ever designed it seriously needs to take some classes again and I don't say that very often.
-
@Xanaecor said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2480411#Comment_2480411
This is the kind of poor communication standards that the community complains about all the time, much like how the information about the DLC versus in-game shop purchase was presented to which I hit a personal pitfall and BVHR made an extra $5 off of me.
I'm sorry, but the information being dropped merely an hour before the DLC is not okay and you can defend that what happened is legal, but it's still scummy and we deserve to be better informed. Instead, we're hyped up on Twitter for weeks and have pre-conceived notions based upon the PTB only to have critical information about purchases and fundamental changes to the DLC being slipped into the Notes on Patch Day for review only an hour before release.
Instead of coming forward and being straight with us about what is going on, BVHR has chosen to double-down on poor communication once again and use ambiguous language while not allowing their staff to comment what-so-ever on the matter. Actions speak louder than words and a little transparency goes a long way.
I love this game, but I'm not loving how we're being treated.
I want the lines back and I think the idea that they could have been removed due to "I Came" memes is laughable given perks such as "Hex: Plaything" and quotes from Pinhead including "Taste our pleasure" and that Pinhead is known for "indulging in the limitless thrill of pleasure and pain." The content within the Hellraiser novel and series includes sexually graphic content and a lot of gore and I seriously doubt this is a license issue due to that specific reason.
Either way, we shouldn't need to speculate. This is clearly a large issue among the DBD community and BVHR should address it promptly.
This this this! @MandyTalk I know it's not up to you, but please at least show this to the appropriate people.
-
@SquidBad said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2487733#Comment_2487733
No it definitely is part of the base game, it's impossible to buy Dead By Daylight without getting the exact amount of Hawkins as to any other map. Are you trying to tell me they could remove Macmillan estate and the huntress tomorrow because they're "free for everyone"? I bought the game in February, I spent real money on it, and included inseparably was Hawkins. It's not separate from the base game because its "free", and besides that it actually isn't free because I had to buy the base game to get access to it.
Not sure why you're even complaining to begin with. If Netflix wants the map gone, it's gone. BHVR doesn't own it and they can get sued if they don't listen to Netflix.
-
@eric_alrasid17 said:
I'm bronze 3 using Pinhead and got 3 Iridescent grade survivor, what a great "skill based" they said
Grades aren't used for match making so they're irrelevant.
-
@MorbidCuriosity said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2482330#Comment_2482330
But do Mods actually have access to information like that? I assumed Mods are just volunteers to keep the forum safe and tidy?
Their response "can't comment further" could mean they don't know themselves and can only go by what BHVR wrote on the patch notes.
Most of the time, when Mandy doesn't know the answer to a question she'll say that she'll go find out and then comes back with the answer (I've seen her do that multiple times). A straight up no comment from her is out of the ordinary.
-
@CornHub said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2482336#Comment_2482336
Character design is different from their cosmetics. They cosmetic team works with what they're given which is admirable.
So it's okay to judge characters based on their base appearance but not their clothing?
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
Don't you literally say the game would be better if ugly characters were deleted from the game?
No response to this is a definite troll.
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481120#Comment_2481120
And all we needed to do was extrapolate from the semi-silence of a prominent mod on a fourm website to divine the meaning of issues with game files really means.
Most often then not, total silence from the devs regarding a popular topic or issue usually means it is a legal complication.
Regardless though, I would not at all be surprised if we never get the sounds back. All a mod has to say, is yes this is temporary and I'll take back all I said. Until then, I'm not convinced this is just a bug.
-
@PhantomChimera said:
What about the Trickster?
There isn't any confirmation on his sexuality. His lore doesn't bring up the topic at all so it's still unknown.
-
@MadLordJack said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481167#Comment_2481167
I think the problem is more about the fact that it's yet another overtly villainous character and people are sick of being associated with villains. Like it or not, cenobites are a clear case of "deviant = evil", one that actually affects people who enjoy BDSM way more than the LGBT+ community.
That's not BHVRS fault though. They don't own the rights to the character so the fact that people are getting mad at them is beyond me.
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481090#Comment_2481090
I thought the "known issues" portion of the notes was where they put stuff that players might occasionally encounter in-game, the total removal of the voicelines, in either case, precludes this.
Even if we were to use that logic, if this was just a simple bug that they intend on fixing, then there's no way a mod like Mandy would have to keep quiet about it. She could have easily just said that this is a bug or technical complication instead of basically saying that she couldn't comment on the subject.
That is yet another reason why this issue seems to be more then just a technical one. Especially since there's so much talk and backlash about it already. You'd think they'd want to assure people that this is just a temporary issue. But their silence not only here but on other platforms too suggests otherwise.
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481075#Comment_2481075
They said complications _with the audio files. Suggesting that the issue was in-game rather than out of studio.
I don't know. I still feel if it was just a bug or an issue that they intended on fixing, it would be in the "Known Issues" section instead of where it is in "Changes from PTB" which implies that it is more of a permanent change.
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2480964#Comment_2480964
The notes listed it as a technical issue, not a licensing one. Many players assumed it was a bug to be fixed after release.
They just said there's "complications". That could mean technical complications or legal ones.
-
@Boss said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2480841#Comment_2480841
False advertising assumes they knew they couldn't keep the voices.
And you can assume that they knew, not gonna rule that possibility out.
You can also assume that something unforeseen happened and that they were certain they could keep the voice in the game up until said unforeseen thing happened.
Just so you know: From a customer's perspective i don't blame how you feel about this ordeal at all.
Of course it feels pretty bad that such a big part of the product is removed shortly before its launch.
But we're missing context, and i really want to know.
Even if they did know a week before release that they were gonna be removed, it would seem quite odd to single it out and announce that the lines would be removed. Even more so when they can't elaborate on why (in the case it's a legal issue).
It would look quite odd for them to say randomly last week for example "yeah the voice lines are being removed due to complications and we can't tell you why or elaborate beyond that. Sorry".
-
@spirit72 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2477913#Comment_2477913
Legion is a proprietary character, not a licensed character, so BHVR can do whatever they want with it. Not so with Hellraiser characters. Could be that the IP owner said that they couldn't have Chatterer speaking in Pinhead's voice, and they still wanted to sell their $15 Chatterer skin. Could really be just a tech issue.
If it was a tech issue it would be listed in the "known issues" section. Since it's not that's pretty good indication this is a permanent change.
-
@greed23 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2477539#Comment_2477539
Welp, guess I'm not buying Pinhead until (if ever) they readd his voice lines. Lets vote with our wallets, boys.
If it's a licensing issue it is 100% not up to them. So I don't understand your comment, regardless of how many people do or don't buy him, if BHVR was told to remove them then they legally have to.
-
@Reinami said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2477539#Comment_2477539
Can you at least clarify if the audio is coming back or not? We can understand the reasons maybe you can't talk about why, but just if it is coming back at all? In the patch notes it is implied that it is a technical issue, not necessarily an issue that would prevent them from ever coming back. People could still theoretically be buying the DLC without knowing that the sounds are never coming back.
Just a simple: "They aren't coming back, they are coming back, or I don't know and will follow up when i do know" would suffice.
It wasn't in the know issues section so I wouldn't count on it coming back.
-
All hair physics or just Jeffs?
-
Sex
-
They were still able to add changes to Jason's power after his lawsuit so I'd imagine touching Demos power wouldn't break any contracts.
-
@Milo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2470752#Comment_2470752
I'm positive, they just are scared it will seperate the playerbase too much, making ques longer than they sometime are.
Identity makes it so they're only avaliable for a few hours at different times of the day. It works quite well.
-
Honestly surprised they haven't made a new game mode. Identity V has like 5 or 6 different games modes.
-
Why do people care what counts as a win? Just play the game and have fun. It's not that complex.
-
@Artick said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2465831#Comment_2465831
Exactly. This would be insanely broken in the killer's favor. Both killers have to chase the same survivor and they will instantly get the down because looping would be impossible since they can come from both sides of the loop. Repeat and win.
And then we have people wanting 2v6 because 2v8 would somehow be too easy for survivors. Goes to show how people don't really think things thru.
Killers could gang up on one survivor but it would be a wrong move on their part. If they want to secure the most kills, they have to split up and focus on different targets. If they both focus on one, those gens will be popping so fast the game will be over by the time that survivor is hooked.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
More reasons why it shouldn't be in the game really.
- Queue Times
- Balancing
- Performance
- 8 survivors doesn't feel very scary
Identity V gets around the que times by only having the mode avaliable for a couple hours at a time a couple times during the day. This works quite well.
As for balance, it seems okay to me, I've had games where the hunters killed all 8 of us, games where all 8 of us escaped, and games where it was half and half.
I didn't have much of an issue on performance. Some slight lag here and there but it wasn't every single game. It is a mobile game after all though.
The scary part is subjective. I don’t really find Identify V scary in the first place so not sure how that theme would translate to DBD.
DBD is a very similar game to Identify V in terms of mechanics. If they can do it, I definitely think DBD could if the devs invested the time into it.
-
@SpitefulHateful said:
IMO, wiggling should be removed. It only works if the Killer is in the mood to farm points and just circles the hook until the survivor wiggles out.
If wiggle was removed then the killer would just always take you to the basement.
-
I'm gay and I don't wear the charm because I'm very OCD about my charms matching my outfits and I very rarely wear something super super colorful that it warrants wearing the charm.
My boyfriend only wears it when he wears a colorful outfit but not when he's wearing a dark outfit.
-
Yeah it's Frank
Last I saw that Susie cosmetic used Julie's model as well. Although I don't know if it was fixed before release.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2455497#Comment_2455497
https://twitter.com/Karu_TC/status/1430955302028029961?s=20
It's fairly obvious in these pictures, especially the item previews
I didnt even look at the pictures, just the full outfit.
-
The idle animation is Joey's, I can't even see the neck to tell on the skin color or tattoo though.
-
@jakesotto said:
I was so confused when I saw he was white when it's a Joey outfit lmaoo. Is it being fixed? It feels wrong. Also they changed the breathing of the male legion character? It sounds like trapper now instead of Frank
The breathing is supposed to only be on the new skin.