Mushwin
Mushwin
About
- Username
- Mushwin
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,220
- Last Active
Comments
-
"cos their locked up, the devs wont let them out...ohhhh"
-
@Marc_go_solo said:
Have to admire their commitment to save everyone, no matter how hopeless it may be! :D
exactly! lol
-
@MrGolden32467 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1765963#Comment_1765963
Names were taken down 10min after the original post :) there were only 8 people that had seen this thread at that time <3
Ohhhhhh <3
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1765963#Comment_1765963
Because:
- The level of harassment they would receive is nowhere near justified.
- You can easily fake this by simply switching names and pretending to be someone else.
- They suffer consequences if you simply report them - they get banned and that's the end of it.
yeah i thought of such as i just posted hence why i edited lol
-
I don't believe he named and shamed I cant see a name?
-
Myers was merely "described" as been evil not that he was:
"A common characterization of Michael Myers is that he is pure evil. John Carpenter has described the character as "almost a supernatural force—a force of nature. An evil force that's loose," a force that is "unkillable".[2] Nicholas Rogers elaborates, "Myers is depicted as a mythic, elusive bogeyman, one of superhuman strength who cannot be killed by bullets, stab wounds, or fire"
I think they are both described as evil etc and doing evil things in their own means and manners, but I don't think anything is set in stone. I hope this helps.
-
I think a yeet is best ^^
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746498#Comment_1746498
You're against something being more 'violent' yet it's dbd we're talking about here...
There is violence in dbd? who'd of thought!
-
I think Father Cambell needs to be a future killer :)
-
@JawsIsTheNextKiller said:
I voted yes, but if you went on a popular shopping website and saw a "trusted" review, would you trust that review?
No because they are paid reviews :)
-
@anarchy753 said:
Asking for it yourself is pretty desperate.
The thread is a joke, hence the amusing options I gave. -.-
-
Did anyone elses as I am a dumb ass think Halloween h20 was something to do with water? preach if you a dumb ass with me! there is no shame!
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746710#Comment_1746710
No one forced you to care about it. But let other people care if they want. I wouldn’t affect you in any way or form. You will still be able to play the game just like ever.
this is a horror game with multiple distinct characters that have established backstories. It’s just logical that relationships may be part of those backstories, there is no need to exclude everything LGBT
I am not saying that I would not care of a lores sexual preference or whom they are it's just not important to a game.
-
@bubbabrotha said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/205721/something-that-needs-addressing-about-elodie
How exactly is this racist? Because she's black? They look similar, its not racist to say so.
it isn't but people cant express an opinion it seems without been called racist
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746691#Comment_1746691
lol
with all the lore already present no one should draw the line at LGBT+ inclusion.
what’s the matter?
mook ######### does it matter? i want to play the game, rage at Mr Mushwin when i am killer and that be it i dont care about anthing else, I mean do I go on other games and have this stuff to deal with? I have friends, family etc in this but hell ITS A HORROR GAME THINK I WENT THROUGH THIS WHEN SILENT HILL 1 CAME OUT! nope
-
@NomiNomad said:
Well, since Laurie looks like her original Halloween design, I believe we have the Michael from the original movie. We have no idea which timeline he would be apart of though, unless they throw in some Halloween (2018) skins or Halloween Kills skins.
But what of the granny Laurie?
-
Just god let it be about horror. The end.
-
@Orionbash said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/205721/something-that-needs-addressing-about-elodie
Actually, it is up for discussion. Allow me: OP, your inherent racism is honestly more problematic than anything I've read on these forums. You might consider how YOU talk about people of colour. First of all, othering people of colour by condemning people drawing similarities between them is pretty gross. Have you ever seen a Nea and accidentally referred to her as a Kate? I have. It happens. And I know I'm not alone. Removing, in this instance, black people from these types of conversations places them on a pedestal which is almost like a backhanded form of racism where you negate them being part of conversations that happen normally in majority populations. Which, for the record, is part of the process of getting all people to equality. Now I'm white. The country I live in is made up of mostly white people. IRL I've got one of those, "Hey, do I know you from somewhere?" kinda faces. "Hey, you look like this dude I went to school with". "Is your name _____?". If a POC were to say that to me I would never, in a million years, assume it was a negative comment. So why are you trying to make it negative in this instance? If people were like, "Durrrr, is that Claudette? All black people look the same to me. I can't tell them apart." I would be more inclined to agree with you as that generalizes an entire population of people and others them by making it seem like they don't have unique aspects to their appearance like other races do. Nobody is saying that. Literally no one.
Secondly, Claudette is one of the strongest survivors in Dead by Daylight. She has some of the greatest perks for newer players and has the strongest stealth game out of any other survivor. Did it ever occur to you that perhaps people referring to Elodie as a potential Claudette 2.0 a GOOD thing? There's a reason that killers dodge lobbies with Blendettes. Perhaps people are excited that there's a new survivor that might have the same level of blending potential as Claudette. And Adam, sorta. Or maybe they're just excited to have a different type of black woman representation. Who are you to try to take that away from them? Oh yeah, a racist.
Thirdly, there are some real injustices that happen to people of colour all around the globe. Trying to make this one of them is absolutely disgusting and you should be ashamed of yourself. You're not gonna solve racism by white knighting behind a keyboard towards a fictional character that people are excited for. Chill out. Check yourself. And put that energy towards something that's actually going to solve racism. Like starting a not-for-profit to invest in black communities as an example.
#########
-
@VexTheHex said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746525#Comment_1746525
I think you're only looking at one side though. Suiciding on the hook may be selfish, but it's also selfish to expect a player to even want to play if most of their existence in the match is being an item or scenery for the other players. If the Killer is camping and mori'ing off hook, I don't want to feed THEIR selfish entertainment cause they literally give 0 thought into the other's fun if most of my gameplay is waiting to be saved/redowned on the spot to be mori'd.
Likewise if Nea is unhooking in front of the Killer, getting that person farmed by both her and Killer... I'm not sticking around for her selfish reasons.
smashes a thumbs up
-
@TWiXT said:
So wait a minute, you're telling me that the Old dude and the woman who's into wearing tank tops are not actually Dwight No. 2 and Meg No. 2?
SMH, yeah right, Next you'll be telling me that the squeaky girl isn't Rule 63 Jake!
I swear, you survivors all look the same to me.
I snort farted into my drink reading this!
-
@WeenieDog said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746608#Comment_1746608
Yeah, I've heard people call Kate " better Meg". Though I can understand where people are coming from when they refer to people who know they are different but still call them the same thing. I kind of would just see it as a joke. The same way people call Nea a goblin or the kate thing. I just get flashes of "how to purple as medical professional?" from my tf2 days
Nea looks like a foot! and I enjoy kates bewbs jiggling and janes butt but just -.-
-
@Moundshroud said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746536#Comment_1746536
The assumption is that if you are a self-centered, inconsiderate, bad sport in the game... that you are probably the same thing in the real world. I'm pretty sure you knew exactly what I meant by that.
LOL! Okay I literally laughed. No. I am not. Ask peeps I play with, Mushwin in SWF is the one that always goes back for someone in the game, I very mych sacrifice myself a lot in the game for peeps. But omg it's a game so take your assumptions and put them somewhere, you know nothing of me. If I get bad team mates think I am going to aid and help them? no.
-
@VexTheHex said:
In the initial reveal of her and David walking together with the fog/distance I can understand thinking it's Claudette with a new outfit as she does have one hair cosmetic that reminds me of Elodie's hair. But it's pretty clear she is someone else pretty fast from there as her facial features are different as well as her skin tone. To add to that, David is in his default outfit so it makes sense the other individual would also be in their default outfit.
But to be fair, I recall some people calling Felix, Ace 2.0. Meanwhile I was just excited to get a generally good looking blond guy in the game. Those have gotten rarer. xD
It's hard because it was cartoon based so it was a little more difficult I feel if it was a trailer as the others then maybe some wont of been as confused *s
-
@thrawn3054 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746595#Comment_1746595
That was my very first thought.
Yes!!! I purely thought the graphics too got better lol
-
@xenotimebong said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746587#Comment_1746587
Thinking it was a Claudette skin promo trailer at first is not necessarily racist, you’re right. But why would someone call her Claudette #2 when they’re completely different? Different nationalities, personalities, looks, voices and mannerisms. Claudette is a skinny nerd and Elodie is a glamorous thief. The only thing they have in common is that they’re both female and black.
It was purely from the trailer if I am honest thats it. From all else I see no they ain't the same, but that was my thought from first thought but I don't feel like peeps should be negative on such.
-
@thrawn3054 said:
I thought it was Claudette at first. I just thought they'd changed her model a bit.
I just thought I was getting a new skin -.-
-
@RamiSamii said:
Knew it was a different character right from the trailer. Why would they put "Claudette" in a brand new cosmetic set, but leave David default? It makes no sense. Claud's big curly hair also isn't even as big as Elodie's. She isn't Claudette #2 and she never will be. She's Elodie, and I don't see how people cannot tell the difference unless they are either visually impaired in some way or frankly just don't care and think "black girl #2 = black girl #1." They aren't even the same shade or shape, nor do they sound the same.
We have had David King in Darkness among us, as I said it could of been a new cosmetic, David looked like he was protecting, looking out for Claudette, to me that is. It is a known thing of survs been in trailers, people shouldn't be judged just because they thought something.
-
@beached said:
I don't know who needs to hear this but people who refer to Elodie as "Claudette Number Two" need to seriously re-evaluate the way they talk about people of color. Elodie, quite literally, looks NOTHING like Claudette whatsoever and the sheer number of people that have been calling her Claudette 2 is disheartening. I tend not to be offended easily, I can take a joke if it is funny but there is nothing funny about literally saying something with racist undertones. Elodie's character model is entirely different from every other survivor in the game, and is obviously the way behavior is going in creating future character models and updating old ones. This isn't up for discussion, if you say Elodie is just another Claudette simply because they're both women of color you seriously need to sit down and think about your implicit racism. Sincerely, members of the community that are tired of people who think racist comments are funny.
I felt very much your OP may of offended literally innocent people, as there is similar differences with Elodie and Claudette, I feel your post seemed to of bashed people that just felt at a glimpse it was Claud and even calling her Claud 2 is not been racist at all. You are basically calling people like myself a racist just because I addressed things that are similar which I don't think it's right and the devs, mods would insta ban people been racist which I cant see posts of such a nature.
-
@Komi said:
Its more the nature of this game's cosmetics that I immediately assumed Elodie was a legendary for Claudette when watching the trailer, until Victor shredded David that I remembered its a chapter.
I did too and I got excited and I said to Mr Mushwin oh it's a new skin for Claudette but it's like I am now ashamed to think of such -rme-
-
Sorry but in the trailer I personally thought she was Claudette with new skins and she was with David. The trailer itself was cartoon based so it very much didn't help, when I first saw the trailer yep I thought it was her, because you never know with BHVR if getting a new surv, new map etc. I haven't made any racist comments, and well sorry but this was my first impression via the trailer, don't hate on people just because some literally like I thought it was Claudette in the trailer. But obvs when I see her in the fog, etc then no nothing like Claudette but maybe perhaps take a step back, view people as I who very much take something at a first glance. Peace.
-
@Moundshroud said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746357#Comment_1746357
It is a game that four other people besides yourself signed in to play with the expectation that you would be finishing the match. I'm old and been around the block. I've found there is a direct correlation to how people behave in "games" and how they behave in the real world. If people don't actually want to play the game, they shouldn't sign in in the first place.
Yeah and a lot of those people will end up leaving me on a hook while they gen rush, I no doubt am older (dunno) but even so I can very much predict how a match is going to be going, from my early start etc, I just move on and with the rift people are more selfish then others and I too, trying to do some missions I wont care I am like toodle oo. But I am honest about such, it is just a game in the end, and uh well I certainly don't do gens and evade Killers in the real world so uhm, not sure where this in game out game assumption comes from :)
-
A stomp seems more..............................violent, then a kick plus the whole kicking the lil (bad word) seems more fitting, stomping just eh I dunno, or maybe he can be grabbed by those ears and tossed over the pallet. ^^
-
@Malum_Midnight said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1743828#Comment_1743828
Yeah, and wasn’t Laurie like 17 when she was taken?
Laurie yep is a character whom is 17 years old, also Nancy is 16 in the first season, pending on what season they based her off, Steve was also 17
-
@AbsolutelyAmel said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1743910#Comment_1743910
60 % of the playerbase is likely under 18 😂😂
Lulz, adds to this, siblings would be on GTA waayyy before they saw this and lets not express the stuff the internet shows us, not everyone can parent 24/7 cos kids see type of stuff but i lold
-
Okay here is an interesting question, well sort of question but ramble. If any of you are familiar with Thirteen Ghosts, how would you feel about these as the killer?
The mother is clearly looking like a child, she is small were as her son is older but looking like a baby, how would we address this situation? what would we call the mother? the child and the .... it's sort of like thw twins in a sense if you read about the characters, well i can put it up. Just the content is of a mature nature:
The Dire Mother is the ghost of Margaret Shelburne who was a shy woman who could never stand up for herself - partly because she rose to only a mere 3 feet in height ever since childhood. She was constantly stared at for her ridiculously small size and her own mother would sometimes dress her like a doll, but Margaret didn’t care as long as she found some perverse form of acceptance. A carnival barker named Jimbo placed her on display in his freak show. Margaret found this life terrible, and...But what I am saying is can we just accept names will be given, appearances will be viewed as things but we know it's in an adult context?
-
@Moundshroud said:
I want to start out by saying that this is not bait. This is an assessment. Both as Killer and Survivor, I've noticed an annoying tendency for people to kill themselves on their very first Hook. While I consider this a vast improvement over disconnecting, it is still the path of the coward. I wish there was a nicer way to say it. When I'm playing Killer it isn't too troubling. I know it will cut down on my Emblem potential but beyond that, some idiot has just taken the game from a 4v1 to a 3v1. What is worse, they don't even let their fellow Survivors milk that Hook for a Generator. These are the people you are hurting:
- Yourself. Every time you take yourself out early from a game that has angered you or seems too hard you have robbed yourself of a golden opportunity to learn and get better. If you think that game is lost, you can play it without stress. Try new things out, play it without anything hanging over your head. Why give up a free tutorial. Some lessons are hard, but those are generally the ones you get the most out of. And believe it or not, what you have already decided is a lost or "not fun" game might turn out to be a win and a blast. To put it simply, "you are leaving money on the table."
- You are screwing over the other Survivors in a horrible way. One less person, even someone who was on the hook, takes tremendous pressure off the Killer and puts it squarely on the backs of the others. When you do it early, you might as well be kicking them in the groin on our way out the door. Why would you do this? What kind of low life do you have to be to look at three other people on your team and say, "screw them" with a shrug? You aren't punishing the Killer in any meaningful way if that is your intent. You are hurting them.
- You are hurting the community. The more often this happens, the more it affects the Meta itself. How hard are your teammates going to work to try and get to someone they don't know is even going to wait for them. I just played a game where I watched an OUTRAGED David tea-bag at the Jake who literally sacrificed himself out just as the David fought through hell to get there. It wasn't that the David didn't get there in time. The Jake just shrugged and said, "see ya" and took himself out. There are going to be games where you want that rescue but people just aren't that into risking it all when they don't trust that you are going to do the right thing and wait. I expect, although I have not tested the theory yet, that the rise in people being left to hit the second stage on the Hook is probably in correlation to the people who sacrifice them on themselves on the Hook. Why is Self Care coming back like a Storm? Survivors, who are not in a SWF, have no trust in each other.
There are only three rules that I follow, and think all of you should too:
- Don't cheat either with hacks or lag spikes.
- Don't disconnect; if you start a game, finish it.
- Be humble in victory, and gracious in defeat.
I will defer the point that sacrificing yourself on the Hook "is" finishing the game to the letter of the law. It is a valid choice. However, it is a violation of rule #2 in spirit. You are taking the coward's way out. And if you walk the path of the coward, it can only mean one thing right?
It's just....a....game....
-
I think he is good as he is I mean Belial was all good and freaky looking and just accepted :)
-
@AggressiveFTW said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1746000#Comment_1746000
That would be cool! Imagine if we had an extreme hippie killer 😂
I feel like it would be a blair witch sorta thing ^^
-
Hmm I think it would be like based on the countryside, be nice to see like some sort of cult stuff there, with craft sort of things and maybe a rotten cabin, or maybe that wooden temple with lotsa cult like things there too.
-
Sorry but if I saw that weird, rat looking goblin lunging at me I would kick it too and ask question ######### it was later! Then haul ass into the woods -.-
-
@bubbabrotha said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1745635#Comment_1745635
It isn't an opinion though. The devs have said that victor is not a child.
Opinions are like buttholes, everyone has one. The Devs stated it, yes but doesn't mean someone can't express an opinion, I quite liked what the OP said.
-
@cannonballB said:
I know this post is funny, but I'm not going to lie - there was a post on here a couple months ago talking about children in the game and I thought this would be serious. The amount of people not just saying they wouldn't but literally couldn't - I was like, technically they can do anything.
ALL of that being said - can we get Chucky now?
Edit - nevermind, found the actually serious post. And I still laughed.
Yeah you are right
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1743862#Comment_1743862
If the biggest source of violence you can find to complain about is coming from a fictional setting, your society is doing very well. That was my point.
Ohhhhh, well said.
-
Saying the word Blue is somehow considered offensive these days -.-
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1743234#Comment_1743234
I agree, it's getting a lot better if the main complaint someone has regarding violence is in a video game.
eh?
-
@0mikeya0 said:
People who say the thong doesn't fit Claudette's character are narrow minded goofs. Lots of different girls wear thongs from the "nerd" to the "sl*t," it makes no sense....
I never had an issue with it but all i see is.........
-
@Dabihwow said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1743654#Comment_1743654
Agreed we need Krampus
yes yes!
-
@Xyvielia said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1743677#Comment_1743677
Wow! Peter Jackson made that!!! I remembered the image but couldn’t think of where I saw it.
Yeah, that li’l guy’s spot on with Victor.
People are mentioning Basket Case, but he looks nothing like that dude’s twin in that movie.
No but no doubt he was kicked in that film and looking like some gloop but no one complained lol
-
Also has to leave this too:
People growing up with South Park didn't get offended, Victor ain't a baby, jokes aside, we can joke on it, i joke on the fact the twins is another term for bewbs......BUT ALSO!!!!!!!!!
did we call Belial a baby? nu uh
-
@Xyvielia said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/205401/and-the-new-killers-be-looking-like
Looks like sth that would be on display in Clown’s section of Crotus
LOL!!!! it's from a film called Brain Dead, Zombie type of film, more of the gimmick like Zombie film but a goodie :)