The_Crusader
The_Crusader
About
- Username
- The_Crusader
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
Lol you're wasting your time. No matter how often they're presented with this evidence they downplay it or start making excuses.alivebydeadight said:@MhhBurgers said:
@Visionmaker said:
Exhibit A:@MhhBurgers said: I won't play killer this entire patch at all and probably many others will do the same with these insane survivor buffs.
Devs nerfed camping.
REEEEE CIV 5
And what did they give killers in return? Ah yes, more nerfs. The survivor escape-rate was already way to high considering they do not even need to escape to win in the first place.
im sorry, did devs show that most survivors dont escape the trial, even shown a chart that had little to no survivors escaping the trial
Look how hes already doing it by saying its only certain killers. There are stats from earlier in the year that show its pretty consistent across all killers. -
Oh for the love of god yes please.
Fed up of the ######### maps in this game. Coldwind, swamp, family residence.
I get that they want survivors to be able to stealth but boy is it ######### boring to play as killer walking around with a ######### fov trying to find people. It's not fun it's just dull.
-
Great post. Well thought out.
Didn't come off as just another disrespectful rant from a salty killer main. No not at all. -
See this is the problem. Killer mains don't want their broken killer nerfed the way survivor mains won't let go of DS so we can never have a balanced game.
They keep begging for balance but balance to them = 4k every game. Every killer needs to be OP like Billy where almost anyone can pick him up and win.
-
The balance will always be ######### as long as the devs are too pussy to remove DS.
Such a broken ######### perk. Absolutely ######### a killer over. 1 of them can kill your momentum, 2-3 just ######### you big time.
Its always the toxic teabagging ######### who use it toom -
He should keep his 115% movement speed.
He just needs his chainsaw nerfed a bit. -
And again -
That's actually not a bad idea.Raccoon said:Reduce Hatch BP to 5K, give the Killer the "bonus" 2K.
Survivor escapes, Killer gets compensation, everyone's a wiener.
This would also provide a hefty incentive to "hit it and forget it" during a Hatch standoff.
-
That's what bugged me too. What's the point in me sweating away trying to 4k with other killers when I could just switch to Billy and have 2 people hooked in the first minute? It's ridiculous how powerful he feels compared to other killers.Goldengeartwo said:
And here I am using Pig and Freddy and Doctor. What's the point when there's Billy?
I hate going against him too. The matching system normally puts in 2 survivors higher skilled than the killer and 2 lower.
Billy will have the less experienced players going down every 30 seconds. It's ridiculous.
Then you see half these noobs needing NOED on top. -
Definitely deserves a LOL
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnwdPlx9yR4Skip to 10:40
"aw f**kbucket, really?" - Mathieu Cote on Decisive Strike
-
@Raccoon said:
Master said:@The_Crusader said:
Oooooof said:
@Wolf74 Well. I think you're stupid. Hit the survivor while his unhooking and then hit him again? It feels so bad for survivors to get tunneled and then go down again. Thats why they are buffing borrow time. Switch the target and you can play as myers, leatherface or hillbilly to instadown the survivor thats unhooking
You're wasting your time. It's pretty obvious these people don't play enough survivor to know how awful it is to be tunneled down the second you're off the hook.
I know it feels bad, but as survivor you have a way out at least. You dont have that as killer unless you DC
Damn Rocky 1 - 4 were amazing.
Balboa as next survivor please.
Clubber Lang as next killer.
"I pity tha fool who hides in my lockers"
-
@Avariku said:
honestly I'd have to agree with the general consensus that it's a rank issue. The rank and matchmaking system that's currently implemented is not great and needs some tweaks.Many of my survivor rounds go exactly the way you're describing and it usually boils down to my team. yes, I screw up sometimes, but when I spend half the round working on gens, breaking totems, and being interrupted to go make hook rescues, and wondering what the hell my team is up to while I'm busy being useful... Then I can't even pretend I might be the consistent problem.
but then again I'm on xbox, and when it comes to console, I can only assume that I'm "usually" playing with literal children survivors.
(the random occasional party invites have, so far, confirmed this theory)No it's exactly the same on PC too.
-
They'll probably have servers for every region.
-
@SnakeSound222 said:
It is. The only reason the Hatch is still in its current state is because BHVR keeps giving in the whiny Scrubvivors. We had a balanced Hatch with the 2.0.0 PTB. Killer could close it and Survivor could repair a gen to reopen it. It only needed two changes: the Survivor would receive a base Left Behind effect to make repairing the gens not boring and the Killer would be able to read the Survivor's aura permanently at an unlimited range after the Survivor has not tried to repair a gen for X seconds to prevent them from getting salty and holding the game hostage (not sure how many seconds, I want to give the Survivor enough time to find a gen but not too much time so Survivors cannot hide until the timer is about to expire and then just tap the gen to reset the timer and continue hiding). However, BHVR decided to listen to the crying Survivors who seemingly needed escape through the Hatch (a base LB effect probably wouldn't have shut them up either) and have the exit gates become active and then they just decided to continue working on it.Daaaaamn. Someone sounds angry.
The devs realized it was unfair and they cancelled it. Good call.
-
I join a gameCarpemortum said:
So you call it out for being a bs consolation prize, and then say you wont play survivor without it?The_Crusader said:@CornChip
Agree 1000%.
It's a consolation prize for a crap game, and if it was gone I'd never ever touch solo survivor ever again.
I'd rather take 1 less killer as killer than lose it as survivor.
So you straight up need a consolation prize or you wont play??
Sounds a little entitled....
People either disconnect, farm each other, or feed a camping killer
Why should I be punished for ######### teammates? Especially the first two options where they either straight up disconnect or just troll by farming.
I'm just you just want your 4k no matter what. Sounds a little entitled. -
And finally he admits he camps.Orion said:I find that camping works more often with SWF.
-
8m, which isn't enough. Sure be more than that imo.Rebel_Raven said:
Sure it is. Aura of the killer within a certain distance isn't strong? It's like BBQ but in reverse minus the blood point bonus.The_Crusader said:
Here's the thing - Kindred isn't even that good.Rebel_Raven said:
Nah, just means that "they," the people behind this idea, and people that like it to a lesser degree, gave no thought to killers, and most probably don't care. Some may resent killers so thoroughly the idea of compensation is a joke.The_Crusader said:
By "they" I assume you're including me, because obviously wanting something to make solo survivor less of a headache meand I want killers nerfed to the ground.Rebel_Raven said:
They didn't mention anything about that for a reason.Master said:Why not, but what would be the compensation on the killers side?
I've said before it wouldn't be unacceptable to ask 4 man SWF squads to lose a perk slot.
They get kindred, alert, bond, empathy etc etc all for free. Sure it's not quite as good as seeing an aura but they get enough information to cover all of those perks plus they have the benefit of co-ordination.
It wouldn't be extreme to say when people join up as a 4 man they have 1 perk slot disabled.
If the devs are too afraid to do that then they could at least compensate killers by giving them increased BP. Everyone knwows SWF is much harder due to the co-ordination, therefore maybe 1.5x BP for a 3 man and 2xBP for a 4 man. At the very least.
Suddenly losing isn't as bad if you're raking in BP for it. It also rewards killers for taking on SWF, rather than their new matchmaking system which forces them into it against their will.
The whole point here is to make solo survivor more enjoyable, and stop SWF from being overpowered.
Plus the more enjoyable solo is = more solo players = less killers crying about swf all the time.
Some, not necessarily you, may not even play killer.
Kindly don't take it personal.
Let's not pretend this isn't a huge weight in the scales of balance for the survivor side, and no mention of anything to counter balance for killers which is going to be pretty damn important.
I'm in the camp that we can't just drop a 10 ton weight on one side of the scales and hope for the best. We need to consider the other side.
Even if we don't get this idea through, there is always hook gymnastics.
Spam, but don't complete the attempt to free yourself to signal being camped.
I figured it would be a pretty universal signal by now. Even the official wiki mentions this.
The problem with buffing solos to SWF level is that they will be SWF level, and the SWF blood point multiplier won't apply to them. Randoms will be SWF strong with zero compensation.
It becomes a whole new can of worms when you are trying to buff solos to SWF. Extra blood points to vs SWF won't help as much.
It becomes an issue of every match becoming harder and harder for the killer.
That said, whe. Talking about counter balancing against solo buffs to SWF level we need general killer buffs.
I've taken it and sometimes it's useful, sometimes it makes no difference.
But it's not like we're advocating for Bond or anything that would give a whole game advantage. We're just looking at ways to maybe make the game a little more enjoyable for solo survivors who often get camped out. Kindred for free isn't strong.
Survivors hate BBQ.
I enjoy solo survivor immensely. Far more than playing killer infact. I still play killer, too.
What if they got a stripped down version? Where it only sbowed if the killer stayed within 8m for more than 5 seconds? Would only affect campers. Wouldnt just reveal the killers direction either.
-
Escape rate is less than 50% = escape rate is too high.MhhBurgers said:Rank8 is not high rank, in rank1 escape rate is too high.
Typical entitled killer mentality expecting a 4k every game. -
Here's the thing - Kindred isn't even that good.Rebel_Raven said:
Nah, just means that "they," the people behind this idea, and people that like it to a lesser degree, gave no thought to killers, and most probably don't care. Some may resent killers so thoroughly the idea of compensation is a joke.The_Crusader said:
By "they" I assume you're including me, because obviously wanting something to make solo survivor less of a headache meand I want killers nerfed to the ground.Rebel_Raven said:
They didn't mention anything about that for a reason.Master said:Why not, but what would be the compensation on the killers side?
I've said before it wouldn't be unacceptable to ask 4 man SWF squads to lose a perk slot.
They get kindred, alert, bond, empathy etc etc all for free. Sure it's not quite as good as seeing an aura but they get enough information to cover all of those perks plus they have the benefit of co-ordination.
It wouldn't be extreme to say when people join up as a 4 man they have 1 perk slot disabled.
If the devs are too afraid to do that then they could at least compensate killers by giving them increased BP. Everyone knwows SWF is much harder due to the co-ordination, therefore maybe 1.5x BP for a 3 man and 2xBP for a 4 man. At the very least.
Suddenly losing isn't as bad if you're raking in BP for it. It also rewards killers for taking on SWF, rather than their new matchmaking system which forces them into it against their will.
The whole point here is to make solo survivor more enjoyable, and stop SWF from being overpowered.
Plus the more enjoyable solo is = more solo players = less killers crying about swf all the time.
Some, not necessarily you, may not even play killer.
Kindly don't take it personal.
Let's not pretend this isn't a huge weight in the scales of balance for the survivor side, and no mention of anything to counter balance for killers which is going to be pretty damn important.
I'm in the camp that we can't just drop a 10 ton weight on one side of the scales and hope for the best. We need to consider the other side.
Even if we don't get this idea through, there is always hook gymnastics.
Spam, but don't complete the attempt to free yourself to signal being camped.
I figured it would be a pretty universal signal by now. Even the official wiki mentions this.
The problem with buffing solos to SWF level is that they will be SWF level, and the SWF blood point multiplier won't apply to them. Randoms will be SWF strong with zero compensation.
It becomes a whole new can of worms when you are trying to buff solos to SWF. Extra blood points to vs SWF won't help as much.
It becomes an issue of every match becoming harder and harder for the killer.
That said, whe. Talking about counter balancing against solo buffs to SWF level we need general killer buffs.
I've taken it and sometimes it's useful, sometimes it makes no difference.
But it's not like we're advocating for Bond or anything that would give a whole game advantage. We're just looking at ways to maybe make the game a little more enjoyable for solo survivors who often get camped out. Kindred for free isn't strong. -
Yeah but it's the co-ordination on SWF that does it.DwightsLifeMatters said:
Removing one perkslot of swfs doesn't close the gap to solo at all. Current meta is how fast u can do gens and how long can u be chased.The_Crusader said:
By "they" I assume you're including me, because obviously wanting something to make solo survivor less of a headache meand I want killers nerfed to the ground.Rebel_Raven said:
They didn't mention anything about that for a reason.Master said:Why not, but what would be the compensation on the killers side?
I've said before it wouldn't be unacceptable to ask 4 man SWF squads to lose a perk slot.
They get kindred, alert, bond, empathy etc etc all for free. Sure it's not quite as good as seeing an aura but they get enough information to cover all of those perks plus they have the benefit of co-ordination.
It wouldn't be extreme to say when people join up as a 4 man they have 1 perk slot disabled.
If the devs are too afraid to do that then they could at least compensate killers by giving them increased BP. Everyone knwows SWF is much harder due to the co-ordination, therefore maybe 1.5x BP for a 3 man and 2xBP for a 4 man. At the very least.
Suddenly losing isn't as bad if you're raking in BP for it. It also rewards killers for taking on SWF, rather than their new matchmaking system which forces them into it against their will.
The whole point here is to make solo survivor more enjoyable, and stop SWF from being overpowered.
Plus the more enjoyable solo is = more solo players = less killers crying about swf all the time.
Removing a perk won't counter optimal genrush.
Kindred on the other side will give solos the tools for optimal genrush. From there, the real balancing between survivor I'm general and killer can really start. But with this current gab, any nerf/buff will just get juggled around without a real balance
I.e. you get 2 people on each door ready to begin opening when the guy doing the last gen says its about to pop.
They know which gens are safe at any given time, they can work together to rush the most important gens to really give the killer the most distant gens when it comes down to the final one.
Its going to be hard to bring solo up to give them that much co-ordination.
Losing a perk slot wouldn't fix it no. But that's 4 less meta perks in the game. 1 less decisive strike, 1 less sprint burst, 1 less adrenaline, 1 less u breakable etc
Better than nothing. -
Ssh. They probably didn't realize this. If they find out, they'll buff it.artist said:
if that were the case adrenaline would bring you to fully healed from deep wound. right now if you're suffering from deep wound and adrenaline procs you'll just lose your deep wound status and stay injuredThe_Crusader said:Mending is healing visually yes.
But its obvious what the intention was.
Healing is healing. Increasing your health state by +1
Mending/Snap out of it/Wake up etc are little actions designed to cure a status effect but they don't increase the health of the survivor.
It makes sense. They want these to be things that slow the survivor down. Things you will be doing often. If you make them healing actions then killers just run Nurse's calling and see them everytime they try to get rid of them.
What they did with Legion made them re-evaluate it. Seems they want to streamline everything like they did when they changed BT to fit with Mending. -
By "they" I assume you're including me, because obviously wanting something to make solo survivor less of a headache meand I want killers nerfed to the ground.Rebel_Raven said:
They didn't mention anything about that for a reason.Master said:Why not, but what would be the compensation on the killers side?
I've said before it wouldn't be unacceptable to ask 4 man SWF squads to lose a perk slot.
They get kindred, alert, bond, empathy etc etc all for free. Sure it's not quite as good as seeing an aura but they get enough information to cover all of those perks plus they have the benefit of co-ordination.
It wouldn't be extreme to say when people join up as a 4 man they have 1 perk slot disabled.
If the devs are too afraid to do that then they could at least compensate killers by giving them increased BP. Everyone knwows SWF is much harder due to the co-ordination, therefore maybe 1.5x BP for a 3 man and 2xBP for a 4 man. At the very least.
Suddenly losing isn't as bad if you're raking in BP for it. It also rewards killers for taking on SWF, rather than their new matchmaking system which forces them into it against their will.
The whole point here is to make solo survivor more enjoyable, and stop SWF from being overpowered.
Plus the more enjoyable solo is = more solo players = less killers crying about swf all the time. -
Mostly in SWF groups. So that they always have at least one who can save the group if slugged.
-
I agree 100%
I play both sides, and as a killer I'd be willing to let Kindred be baseline to make my solo survivor gane tolerable.
It's not that strong a perk against most killers anyway but it gives survivors a chance against the toxic ones. -
Ruin - She can defend it, and it buys you time to cross the large maps and set a few traps.
I take sloppy butcher too if you get that. Combines well with M&A and NC.
STBFK is probably a good one for hag. So many times you need to teleport but you're in an attack cooldown. -
See this is the problem. Thinking that Nurse and Billy are the "valid killers".Tsulan said:ad19970 said:@Tsulan said:
Now we have Freddy 2.0 but at least he can vault pallets!
Killer being able to kill? Go away with this nonsense!We got the killer the survivor community asked for. Someone who gives the thrill of a chase without being an actual threat. Someone who can't even tunnel.
I hope survivor mains buy this chapter. Because I doubt that killers will.
Dear lord man you pretend like the devs are purposefully giving killer mains the middle finger. So they made a killer that isn't as viable. Happens. Both Clown and Spirit, the last two killer, turned out to be viable, especially Spirit.
Plus we should still wait and see how he plays with the new changes before coming to final conclusions. I still think he might be better than some of the other killers in the game.
Plus I will get the new killer that's for sure.
Oh did I miss clown as one of the top killers?
Mmhh I never see him on rank 1. Must be my imagination...
I didn't expect much before they released him on the PTB. And I still were disappointed.
The times of valid killers like Billy and Nurse are over. Let's face it.
Even the devs think that not all killers should be valid. So, I'll just save my money.
I haven't spent money since Freddy was released. Before that fiasco, I bought every DLC. But after that joke? Naah
Basically, "everyone who can't consistently give me a 4k isn't valid"
Billy and nurse are OP. -
Lmao get a grip. See this trying to fit everyone in a box mentality is the problem.Tsulan said:
If I remember correctly, you don't play killer then.The_Crusader said:
No #########, it's basically just "don't buff the side I don't play".Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
I'll admit, some of the posts deserved the lols. Killers would do it to survivor posts too. But there were many times people would have logical ideas that would like 20-25 lols and NO-ONE would explain why they disagreed, or if they did, they were condescending.The_Crusader said:
Oh my, the irony.Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
Guess the devs hoped that by removing the "LOL's" that survivor mains would quit spamming all killer buff posts with it whilst contributing nothing to the discussion.JanTheMan said:Nooooo!!!
There was definitely some people abusing it but not the people you think it was.
Back to topic.
There really was no reason to remove them.
Defending the survivor side a bit doesn't make me anti-killer.
Hell most of my posts here are just me moaning about Decisive Strike. -
If it didn't stop during Mending he would be extremely OPRSB said:@DarkWo1f997 said:
Legion changes include mending no longer stopping the timer, reduced vault distance, stuff like that.
Such a shame, that "timer ticking while mending" is useless, because it stops at 99% and does not down survivors.
-
#########? Cinematic trailers have to be ultra realistic now?
Guess they need to change the opening scene then. It's not realistic. It shows Claudette and Jake near a gen on a dark map, and the Trapper gets Claudette.
We all know when you and claudette are on a gen on a dark map the killer sure as hell never spots Blendette first. -
No more getting teleported back over vaults, yay!
I have to wonder just how much cash Behaviour is raking in to support this though. I mean the cosmetic store is pretty expensive for what you get, and then every lobby seems to have cosmetics in it. They're talking about long term support and engine upgrades too.
They must be raking it in. Which is good of course because that leads to more long term support for the game. -
There's no way in hell they're going to implement a monthly fee. Only MMORPGs do that.Tsulan said:You sound a little bit to optimistic for what little has been revealed.
As far as we know, they could implement a monthly fee.
Connection could persist.
Region lock could come back.
Some areas might not get any servers at all like Australia.
Etc.
Please don't behave like this announcement solved all problems.
DBD already has the game, the dlc, and now the cosmetics store for revenue.
-
No #########, it's basically just "don't buff the side I don't play".Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
I'll admit, some of the posts deserved the lols. Killers would do it to survivor posts too. But there were many times people would have logical ideas that would like 20-25 lols and NO-ONE would explain why they disagreed, or if they did, they were condescending.The_Crusader said:
Oh my, the irony.Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
Guess the devs hoped that by removing the "LOL's" that survivor mains would quit spamming all killer buff posts with it whilst contributing nothing to the discussion.JanTheMan said:Nooooo!!!
There was definitely some people abusing it but not the people you think it was.
-
"Time to spread some kindness around for a change"
This is the way to play. Try to detoxify the community.
I had 2 people D/C on me last night. So I let the last two farm each other and escape. Well one insisted I kill them anyway. I got my 2 x disconnecter points and a few hooks anyway, they were going to get nothing - and why should they be punished for staying in the game?
And hopefully if they play killer and people disconnect, they go easier on the survivors left in return.
-
Oh my, the irony.Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
Guess the devs hoped that by removing the "LOL's" that survivor mains would quit spamming all killer buff posts with it whilst contributing nothing to the discussion.JanTheMan said:Nooooo!!!
There was definitely some people abusing it but not the people you think it was. -
You're wasting your time. It's pretty obvious these people don't play enough survivor to know how awful it is to be tunneled down the second you're off the hook.Oooooof said:@Wolf74 Well. I think you're stupid. Hit the survivor while his unhooking and then hit him again? It feels so bad for survivors to get tunneled and then go down again. Thats why they are buffing borrow time. Switch the target and you can play as myers, leatherface or hillbilly to instadown the survivor thats unhooking
-
Cote 5 years from now - "Go play Civ 7 or something".
-
I'm waiting until certain people start complaining that this is a huge buff for survivors since you won't get the latency advantage on pallet hits as much anymore.
-
The Feng army :chuffed:Vietfox said:I don't even like his appearance, i'll only use him for the daily and stick with my Feng
-
I take it that's a pun on what they said about Legion.PiiFree said:Not every Survivor has to be viable, it's all about fun.
Yeah I just assumed Jeff's noise levels were an oversight, guess not. He's a pretty big guy too.
Guess Jeff is for those people who like to challenge themselves, like those with the bright gold Ace cosmetics.
The tryhards will still stick with you-know-who though. -
I used NC on Freddy sometimes but barely saw anyone waking up.
It was more...
- Survivor is 35-40m Away, see the aura of them healing
- They fail skill check and wake up, lose their aura
- Continue heading in that direction, get to 28m and see them trying to heal fully with NC
So it's not like it's useless on him. -
I was hoping this announcemenr would entirely be dedicated to a DS nerf.
-
I said I offered the challenge of a standoff with killers who camped.Orion said:@The_Crusader said:
If neither know the killer has a much, much higher chance of finding it first for the reasons listed above - higher movement speed and no need to stealth.No, because it depends on each player's location relative to the hatch, which is largely random.
Weren't you the guy saying that he forced Killers into hatch stand-offs when you found it before they did? How come you're now saying that the Killer always finds the hatch first?
And thats because in those 2 specific circumstances, I had time to find the hatch because they were too busy camping a hook on the other end of the map.
With killers who go out hunting it's a different story. -
If neither know the killer has a much, much higher chance of finding it first for the reasons listed above - higher movement speed and no need to stealth.Orion said:@The_Crusader said:
But more often than not the killer gets there first.Especially if the hatch doesn't spawn until there's only 1 survivor left.
In your experience, maybe. In my experience, the outcome is equally divided between either of us knowing where the hatch is and neither of us knowing where the hatch is.
-
But more often than not the killer gets there first.Orion said:@The_Crusader said:
But then it'd an automatic win for killers.Killers move around at 115% movement speed and can search freely for the hatch.
Survivors move at 100% speed if runninf, but mostly have to walk/crouch around trying to find the hatch while also hiding from the killer.
The killer could easily find the hatch first and then it's over for the survivor. Or the survivor would just have to wait far away while the killer camps the hatch which just leads to a long range standoff.
If you blocked the hatch upon a hit there would be no point in having a hatch.
Alternatively, the Survivor knows where the hatch is (because maps exist) and gets there before the Killer.
Especially if the hatch doesn't spawn until there's only 1 survivor left. -
But then it'd an automatic win for killers.TragicSolitude said:@Hitm3on3mor3tim3 said:
The should just do a dual type thing when the Hatch stand off is in play.
The two players enter the circle around the Hatch to start it, with increasing difficulty of hitting certain buttons.
If the killer wins he gets to mori the survivor and if the survivor wins they escape.That's completely unlike any other mechanic in the game. It'd be easier to just have it so that the entity closes off the hatch for a few seconds when the killer hits the survivor and the survivor isn't in mid-jump. Now survivors can't walk up to killers with impunity at the hatch; killers can hit survivors and it's not an automatic escape.
Also, if the killer is going for a BBQ 4 stack, they may want to hook a survivor, not mori them.
Killers move around at 115% movement speed and can search freely for the hatch.
Survivors move at 100% speed if runninf, but mostly have to walk/crouch around trying to find the hatch while also hiding from the killer.
The killer could easily find the hatch first and then it's over for the survivor. Or the survivor would just have to wait far away while the killer camps the hatch which just leads to a long range standoff.
If you blocked the hatch upon a hit there would be no point in having a hatch. -
Where is David's trademark "ARRRRRRGH" scream?
-
But you can do that already. You can see survivor profiles and survivor names.PapaAndrei said:
We wouldn’t be dodging survivors, wed be dodging a specific type of survivors, who have an indication of being toxic, or people who I have played with before and I KNOW are toxic.The_Crusader said:
Did I say that? I said the SWF would be lobby dodged to oblivion by the killer community, not me personally.Master said:@The_Crusader said:
@Master said:
The_Crusader said:So yeah another morning of facecamp after facecamp after facecamp. Great game you got here btw, great community too.
When you look at the killers profile many have comments enabled and its just one huge wall of people posting things like "-rep camper" or "-rep camps all game".
The camping in your game is so bad it's unbearable. Everyday I try to be optimistic about survivor but I always feel like playing it less and less.
At least if we could see the profile we could have an idea of if we want to play with such a toxic person or not. Killers can see survivors profiles its only fair that survivors can do the same.
Sure, but only when the killer can see SWFs
Probably wouldn't work as they'd get lobby dodged to oblivion.
But otherwise I'd be down for that. I play solo and get accused of being SWF for no reason. Sucks when someone tbags the killer and they take it out on the team by camping then explain after the game how they thought we were all friends.
SO you wanna see killer names to lobby dodge killers, but dodging SWFs is not ok?
Also I wouldn't be dodging killers, I'd be dodging specific killers who have an indication of being toxic - or people who I have played with before and I KNOW are toxic.
The same way killers can dodge survivors now who they know or suspect to be toxic.
Your way isn't dodging specific SWF, it's dodging ALL SWF.
So I assume you're implying all SWF are toxic, in which case you're wrong. -
Orion said:
@The_Crusader said:
Now just remove rank reset so solo is playable.Then everyone will just slowly rank up, making rank useless and breaking the matchmaker for newcomers. Might as well get rid of rank altogether.
Yeah well at the moment you get reset to green ranks everytime. It's unplayable because new players go down every 10 seconds. Not even exagerrating.
So at the moment the game feels like a chore - where you NEED to put the hours in to rank up just to have a more enjoyable experience. But you gotta suffer a lot of crappy games to do that.
If they had no rank then all it would take would be one very bad survivor to cost your team the game. -
Now just remove rank reset so solo is playable.