Sypherpathic
Sypherpathic
About
- Username
- Sypherpathic
- Joined
- Visits
- 882
- Last Active
Comments
-
This would help. Ultimately, I would like to see a variance that is player specific. Like this person is x% above or below your MMR or whatever.
Showing the grades is just confusing the ... easily confused masses. It's tiring.
-
@chargernick85 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2484283#Comment_2484283
I'm iri 2 at the moment. My first Pinhead game was against all ash players.
You're making a point that is meaningless, as far as I know.
My understanding is that the grade now has nothing to do with who you match against, so why mention it?
MMR doesn't reflect in grade. On the 13th, everyone's grade will reset to ash. MMR will remain the same.
-
@Kilmeran said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2484283#Comment_2484283
We don't know how much. They haven't stated it and won't state it. It's been asked over the months of testing. All we know if that the MMR of your other killers has a strong bearing on the "beginning MMR" of your new killers.
I haven't seen that anywhere. It seems to me it would make some sense to start a player that does well with other killers out at better than 0 with a new killer, but sounds like maybe they're putting people too high. In theory, wouldn't the MMR system move that killer/player combination up or down to compensate? Whereas the old system would force the killer to either suffer or depip on purpose? Seems like an improvement, to me.
-
@Munqaxus said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2484254#Comment_2484254
Most likely the OP plays killer a lot. When he plays a new killer, whatever score he's been getting previously translates over. So if the OP was continually getting 4ks on Nurse, then played Pinhead for the first time, then Pinhead gets part of the Nurses MMR to adjust for players that know how to play Killer but don't know how to specifically play a new killer.
Well the idea of separating MMR per killer was to alleviate some of the issue with going against very good survivors with a new killer. The question is, if some of the 'residual skill' from other killers moves to a new killer, how much is it?
-
@Konnor24 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2479923#Comment_2479923
Interesting idea about the chains. The teleport i believe will be tweaked. See this is where i have sympathy with BHVR over balancing. When new killers come out and they're very strong, or an ability is very strong, this forum and their twitter gets absolutly flooded with survs whineing about being unable to play against, too OP etc. The hyperbole with underpowered killers does seem to be less. So with every new killer it does seem like they are releasing them a bit weak and then fine tuning them so that they seem more powerful in the next patch. Really they should probably be doing a longer Beta for these killers rather than 3 weeks so they can be released in a better place.
Chains should be doing damage after a few hits though. Definitely agree with that.
Also, if they release a strong killer and then nerf, people want a refund because they wanted to buy an OP killer.
So it incentivizes making killers weak out of the gate, then dialing them up, which I believe is what they have had to do with pretty much every killer.
-
@Marik13 said:
I think you might be on to something. There were games where I had plenty of hooks spread out, no kills, but I still got at least brutal killer. I remember before where if I had games like that I'd have entitity displeased. Which come to think of it, I don't think that I got entity displeased at all last night cus I'd manage to get plenty of hooks in.
Isn't 'Entity Displeased' based almost entirely on hooks? SO getting a 4K mori will result in 'Entity Displeased'?
-
@Dsalter said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2484161#Comment_2484161
the grade isnt the issue, i took a 2month break, so im a "0 mmr" player due to their resent slate wipe, the groups im being put up against as a "new" player are so desgustingly one sided its borderline questionable how setting the default mmr to the BOTTOM of the numbers was a freaking good idea.
when you do mmr system you start people at the middle so people can either climb or fall.
starting at the bottom means you will ONLY climb, never fall, meaning whenever a sweat group wants to stomp "ez" games they can just get a DBD gift for a friend, let him "smurf", party with him, artificially lower your groups mmr low enough to be against "ez" matches, repeat ad infinium.
edit: and because bottom of the mmr means you cannot go any lower, new account smurfing will become so abusable that new players will almost ALWAYS be against either sweaty smurfers or literal newbies, no inbetweens, and because losing means no progress AT ALL because your always at the bottom, this pattern with infinitely happen
Puts up giant graphic with arrows making a point with grades...
"GRades aren't the Issue"
Where is it stated that they're setting the 'default mmr to the bottom'? Are you referring to the fact that MMR is not across all killers but individual per killer?
It sounds like a viable point that averaging a group because there is a lower MMR player on the survivor side might not work out so great. But how many accounts cant those players create? It's a diminishing return. Maybe the 'averaging' mechanic for mixed survivor teams needs a look. My assumption is that they need time to look at that kind of statistic.
Everyone around here is so touchy. I realize it's a ######### up game with a lot of bugs and the company has a ######### track record but what do you propose as the alternative? The old method wasn't working for everyone, either. At least making a change is an attempt at progress.
-
@TacitusKilgore said:
"lack of patience?" He is nearly COMPLETELY unchanged from his PTB iteration. We've had several weeks to get a feel for him, its not like people are formulating these opinions solely off a day 1 release. To imply they are is to be very disingenuous.
PTB was open only for PC for one week.
Are you saying that, though there are material changes at live release, that that one week of exposure to the new killer, ignoring changes and the live environment experience, is enough for people this killer? Seems shortsighted to me.
-
@Lochnload_exe said:
Pinhead has barely been out a day, and it seems like everyone wanted a killer that was super easy to pick up and play. Pinhead is a very hard killer to play, but he is in no way the worst killer, he isn't even near the bottom lmao. Maybe we have been spoiled with killers that have very little depth and skill needed like trickster and Nemesis. I'm already calling it. Pinhead is gonna get big buffs, and then there will be posts saying "me no like he is so strong and annoying now!!" How about we actually practice and try to be patient when they finally add a unique and skillful killer lmao the amount of posts or things I've seen where it is just "I played 1 round with the new killer that I haven't had practice with and obviously won't 4k with and I think he is weak pls buff bhvr" is sad
Agreed. It literally says he is 'hard', but like little kids, so many people are saying 'WAAAAH TOO HARD TO PLAY. WEAK KILLER'. Really? I think it's more like you are just weak and can't spend some time rising to the challenge to see how this killer really is. So many seem to just want the new killer to be easy street without any effort. it came out yesterday, ffs.
-
@bm33 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481828#Comment_2481828
While grades are different right now players know what rank they were and the current grade is equal to that. So players are seeing iridescent 4 with Ash 1 or Bronze 3 and are thinking SBMM isn't working because they know Ash 1 was a 17 and Bronze 3 was a 15. If hidden for the time, atleast until reset, it will remove their ability to judge based on grade which currently is what their rank would've been.
SBMM is active as of today. Theoretically, you should stop worrying about comparing your own grade against others. I guess some people can't mentally grasp it.
-
@justbecause said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481848#Comment_2481848
No I don't think I owe u anything babe especially not my reasons why I dislike him but you're free to cricle around my thread I guess? I'm not pinhead I didn't chained u up to write on my thread or stay? I wrote my opinion idc if u think it's legit or not also ur more than free to say my opinion is ######### after all that's opinion too 🤷♀️
Oh no, r/ihadastroke.
Typing, it's a thing. Best of luck. I hope that you have fun in future!
-
@captainlongshlong said:
"Skill based matchmaking ratings are also separate for each Killer, meaning you’ll have tougher matches with the Killer you’re really good at, but easier matches when you’re trying out a new Killer for the first time."
I have 2.5k hours in the game. Currently sitting at Iri II killer (casual killer not a particularly good one) I have never played Demogorgon in my life. I have no perks (except for the three tier 1 teachables). I wanted to test to see if what BHVR said would happen, would actually happen and I would be matched with less skilled survivors considering I have never played that killer before. So I bought Demo and jumped into a game.
I was absolutely obliterated by 4 Iri I/II survivors. They ran every tile near-perfectly, they were optimal, managed their time efficiently. If anything, this was a significantly higher standard of team than I used to get.
Not impressed.
Sorry that you came up against a team of survivors better than you. Don't worry. Play more matches and you will descend to whatever level you match up against and you can win matches again. Strength, friend.
-
@justbecause said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481685#Comment_2481685
This isn't suggestion thread or bug thread nor balance threads I belive as far as I know there's thread strictly made to feedback and as u can see I didn't write in feedback but general discussion casuall talk I belive we're free to express our opinion without u needing an 195839 answers to why like it's life threatening situation I just said mine opinion here and that's it
Spoiler alert: Your opinion is #########. Helpful? 'DIS SUCKS' isn't that great of an opinion. Do you want to say why?
-
You can move down in a grade, say from II to III or IV, but you can't go back from say, gold to silver. if you make it to gold, you won't drop back to silver.
-
@xenotimebong said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481772#Comment_2481772
Honestly, same to you. I hope that SBMM turns out to be a great new feature that improves the game, even if there’s a bit of an adjustment period for it first. :)
Well for me at least, I just want every player to have fun, survivors or killers. The sooner, the better.
-
@chargernick85 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481710#Comment_2481710
Not to mention everyone considers a bad game different. Bad teammates don't mean the MMR is wrong, your kill count does not mean the MMR is wrong, it's about whether the others in the trial were your skill level and whether or not you had a legit chance to win.
Great comment.
-
@Jplanas98 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481768#Comment_2481768
Did you even read the post or just decide to make a comment that doesn't even apply just because you read the title. At no point did I even complain about not being able to get kills, if you can actually read then you can understand that my entire complaint is basically that his chains are easily broken.
For sure. Have you seen the post where someone suggests using chains on the long legs of loops? because it sounds like you are using chains where they are weak and then complaining that... they are weak.. Yes, the chains are easily broken. what are you doing to take advantage of how they work? Because it seems to me that there are people who are.....
-
@xenotimebong said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481747#Comment_2481747
Maybe you shouldn’t assume what other people do or don’t support based on nothing? I’m not in favour of hair trigger reactions, I’m just pedantic. Which is why I replied to a comment and not the post itself, which I actually agree with.
Fair enough. I'm all for giving the new changes some time to sink in. Sounds like you are, too. Best of luck.
-
Hmmm, weird. I've seen some Youtube videos of people succeeding with kills as this killer.
Are you sure you're not just assuming things should work a certain way and, instead of being clever and finding a way to win, you're just assuming if you can't play as you always have and get a win, the killer is broken?
Hmmmmm.
-
@JohnWeak said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/278378/does-anyone-have-faith-in-bhvr-anymore
I had faith in the SBMM system. BHVR said it worked perfectly. Fact is it doesn't work at all.
1st game as survivor : Terrible killer, hold him in chase like 2 to 3 minutes. Other survivors ? They didn't do anything, they felt down in 10 seconds. Game lost.
2nd game : killer was a camper/tunneler. Survivors ? They ended up all three on the hook at the same time cause they all died in less than 20 seconds around the 1st hooked guy. Could hold the killer 1 minute even though i had never played against the Pinhead, which has a trash design btw. Too much map control without skill required and of course framerate drops all the way with a high end computer.
Didn't they have prior datas to launch SBMM ? I mean i'm 1200+ hours in survivor, can hold a long time most killer mains in chases... Well no way it is working.
So... you're judging the system after 2 games.
Ouch. Friend, I recommend you play a few more games before exacting judgment. Maybe 50?
-
@xenotimebong said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481710#Comment_2481710
Can you please tell me where I said anything about throwing the whole system out? I was disagreeing with someone’s claim that the system requires placement matches, not making any judgements about the system itself. I haven’t even had time to play a single match yet, I have no idea how good or bad it might be.
Sorry, seems like maybe I just chose a poor post to reply to... It does sound like you're supporting people making negative feedback about a pretty big change after it's been live for an eyeblink based on what is fairly unknown information.
Maybe the past recording of information was not as pertinent as they thought and it DOES need some time to dial in. Who can say?
I'd say people's feedback will be more valuable in a few days, a week, a couple of weeks from now rather than having a hair-trigger response just because we assume the past data will give us perfect matches right out of the gate...
I think OP is posting against people who are obviously posting against MMR without any real experience of the live MMR that we're all part of now.
-
@Exor said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481693#Comment_2481693
I would really hope that they still require at least some placement matches, otherwise this system is quite questionable. It matched me with a group that had at least 4.5k hours each as a survivor and as a killer against a group that had 500 hours max, and I have more hours as a killer.
My understanding is they've been gathering data for placement for some time. Obviously, not sure if they're collecting more than they're using and then adjusting or changing what markers apply to MMR, but I'd assume that there's some usable history there.
That being said, it still doesn't work after 10 minutes that someone had one bad match. COme at me with "I've played 30 matches and 18 were crappy" or whatever. That being said, if MY last 30 matches were good, I'm still going to assume you just are a Luddite who wants old ranks back and somehow assumes posting a 'WAAAAH' crying post will make that happen.
-
@xenotimebong said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481656#Comment_2481656
Unless you have a legitimate source to prove otherwise, you’re wrong. They’ve been gathering data for this. Nobody is starting from scratch unless they’re brand new or haven’t played for months.
Right, so if I have one bad match, then the whole system should be thrown out?
I'd have more respect for people's feedback in a few days when they can indicate how many matches they've played and why they think it's bad.
Posting 'MMR BAD' after 5 minutes means you did nothing and just wanted to post something useless.
For example, I actually heard @ScottJund in a video say '10 out of my last 14 matches as pinhead disconnected'. THis is actual value for something that is materially happening or people wouldn't be posting.. but when I see people posting something, and I'm not experiencing it, I'm sceptical if they're just spewing crap without any numbers. Sure, someone could just make up numbers... But that's just better lying. Having real meat behind your argument means it's worth more respect. "WAAAH X SUCKS" means nothing. Especially when you say it after only a few minutes without any kind of evidence.
-
@justbecause said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481316#Comment_2481316
There's no much overthinking in that if he sucks that only means one thing no need to explain it like nuclear science when u say something sucks than it means it's bad af
OK. So they should just like.. do stuff until he doesn't suck? It's not much of a conversation point, my dude. You'll only get 'yeah, he sucks!' or 'nuh uh'. Why does he suck? If you were a dev, what would you do to improve him?
Otherwise, I'm afraid your discussion point just looks like a tantrum.
-
@justbecause said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481078#Comment_2481078
General discussion is for opinions and casuall talk no? So I shared my opinion about new content just like others and obviously I want to hear others that's why we're here in first place
Well I hope others are more in-depth than 'he just sucks'.
-
Noooo, you're not smart if you aren't cynical. You have to prove to everyone that you see what's wrong with the creations of others and be snarky and cynical about things!!
(I do this, too, but it's really prevalent on these forums).
Good on you for having a good time!
-
I guess my last bit on this, like anyone cares about opinion at this point... is...
You could just say 'hey, I bought this and I don't like it without the voice' or 'hey, you had the voice in test and now it doesn't' and try for a refund. I'd suggest you'd likely get it.
Otherwise, if this is somehow about like.... a lawsuit or some kind of legal standing, not gonna happen.
In other news, I think I've 'spent' more than $5 of my time on this thread at this point....
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481122#Comment_2481122
I think many players thought it was removed due to issues with the game files, and by this I mean the buggy state of the chapter than out of studio issues. They mention game files as their reason.
Part of representing the product as viable for purchase isn't explaining why. They removed the voice. Buy or not. If you missed that the voice was removed, that's on you.
I guess you're saying they deliberately lied and were going to remove the voice all along? That it was in the PTB just to attract more sales and then they craftily pulled the rug out at the last second? I guess that might work on some..... But I still think it's on the buyer in that case.
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481102#Comment_2481102
If they can't be forthcoming due to legal issues, then they can at least offer refunds to players who have. You say consumers have to right to ask about products they wish to purchase, I disagree.
In a similar vein, he only people who can clear up this issue is BHVR, and they haven't said anything.
Why? They clearly stated that the voice line was removed in the patch notes. There are posts literally everywhere of people stating that it's been removed. I made the informed decision to purchase knowing it was removed. If someone didn't see that it was removed and then made the purchase, I could see that they could compassionately allow a refund but there's certainly no requirement to do so.
-
@justbecause said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481034#Comment_2481034
I agree we need to play more with him/against him but rn he just seems idk bad
I'm curious what you think the impact of sharing this nebulous opinion will be. Do you hope they'll change the character randomly until you DON'T think he's 'idk bad'? Maybe you just want people to agree with you on forums so you feel vindicated in your dislike? Please enlighten.
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481039#Comment_2481039
BHVR says they will not be forthcoming with any further information, even though they can clarify this by being straightforwardly truthful.
The opposite of your reasoning is what led many to believe it's a legal basis. If they feel they might get into legal trouble or endanger the license by saying anything they won't. They might even have had to work with the licensing party on the language in the patch notes. They've said a number of times that they can't comment further in forums. THat all sounds like a perceived legal issue.
Of course, it could all be a smokescreen, trying to LOOK like a legal issue but it's some other reason, but you know, the most reasonable explanation is often true and for something like this here, that REALLY doesn't matter THAT much, I'm content with how they've handled it.
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2481023#Comment_2481023
Yeah it says there are complications with the audio files, audio files being a very technical item within the game.
BHVR had a chance to clarify it was a licence issue, but instead they framed it as a technical sounding one.
You're reaching. While I agree, this is obfuscating language on the part of Behaviour, your assumptions aren't their fault. Complications can mean a lot of things, and no one on the outside really knows what's up, it's all conjecture. Point is, though, that they've used a reasonable method to make it clear the voice is removed and, more importantly, it became VERY well known in the community very quickly so obviously, reasonable people figured it out right away. There's no reasonable way to present that they were misleading. In my opinion.
-
@justbecause said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2480937#Comment_2480937
Yep only after 24 hours enough time to see on which ground he's standing
Fair enough. For me, I'll be trying different strategies, maybe different perk builds to counter him and have some fun.
-
Nope. And you're reading into the notes. I don't believe that they lied about the reason.
Excerpt from the patch notes:
Changes from PTB
The Cenobite
- The Cenobite's voice over lines have been removed due to complications with the audio files.
It says 'complications', not that it's a bug. Assumptions on anyone's part are not their responsibility. I assumed, since it's under 'changes' that it was considered a permanent removal. Does that mean they might come back or come back differently, sure.
Thing is, this came out BEFORE the character was even purchasable and it's still part of the notes. Caveat emptor. I saw this and chose to buy the character anyway. Sure, I buy things that feel different than I expected or I miss things when I make a purchase. I also have no problem recognizing that it's on me to catch that stuff. They present something to buy. You have a choice to buy it or not. For myself, and I believe for reasonable consumers who do any kind of basic due diligence (for a $5 purchase, less than an hour's parking in most major cities), the communication is fine.
How would you have done it differently, given the parameters of having to remove the voice lines but still sell the character? Skywriting? Amber alerts? Literally NOTHING will get to everyone. In fact, there are NO ways for a game company to communicate something that 100% of people will see. There will always be people who don't look, click and ignore, etc.
-
Wow, after only 24 hours.
I hate hag more, I dislike Doctor more. On any given night, if I get a particular killer a lot, they move up on the list.
I really dislike the Trickster.
But we'll see. I've only gone against Pin(e)head a dozen or so times with PTB + Live.
-
Of course, one should only play the 'best' killer according to the internet. Otherwise, how can I brag that I'm rank 1 constantly?
-
@Pukenplag said:
All you had to do was open the game news.
If you looked everywhere, then you would've quickly found what they mean.
Open the game news and read everything about "grades" there (yes, ranks are now called grades)
I've tried nothing!
-
Thanks for the tips! I was gathering blood points last night for him so didn't play him. Going to give it a shot tonight and I like where you're going.
It's frustrating seeing so many people just throw their hands up and say 'new killer bad' every time a new one comes out. They don't think or innovate, they just want the killer to have win buttons. Sure, there will be adjustments needed and every killer isn't top tier, but I feel like this one will be engaging and fun for me.
Nicely done.
-
@Phasmamain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2480577#Comment_2480577
Except pinhead has the natural slow down of the box and the chain hunt aswell as blocking fast pallet vaults.
He’s not worse just harder to use
Yeah, I watched some videos yesterday where the killer was clearly catching survivors because the killer was hitting them with chains that slowed them down.
I myself haven't played him yet but I've played against him and seemed like everyone had a pretty good match.
-
@Pikachaouuu said:
I have seen people saying that you can loose lots of matches but still be in the same grade, i have been living under a rock for the lasts weeks so i have no idea wich speciffic changes they did.
So basically if i go ahead and play with a killer for doing the daily quests and loose horrible, i wouldn't have to go down from gold II to gold III or am i understanding this new system wrong?
The grade system also has nothing to do with who you're matched against, it's just a scale for a blood point reward on the 13th of each month.
-
@DetailedDetriment said:
Every chapter we've had since Oni (with the exception of Blight) has been complete garbage. The killers suck, the one map we got is currently the worst in the game, and the perks are either complete garbage or completely broken. The people asking for a refund have a reason, and with McLean gone, more of these posts will pop up.
Not really. If every chapter since Oni has been garbage, why would one continue to buy them? There are many, many readily available review sources for this stuff and this particular content has been out less than 24 hours. If someone continually pulls the trigger instantly on content then wants a refund immediately, that person is being theatrical. Maybe slow down and not buy new content for a couple weeks. Maybe if the game is such trash, abandon your sunken cost and move on?
-
@PoweroSymbols3 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2478094#Comment_2478094
If you have time to play dbd, u have time to read the patch notes that appear before u get into the game
Sure, but many don't seem to have that time... Or they ignore the link in the news, etc.
What baffles me is people who DON'T read the notes but still come here or to the subreddit to complain or ask things that are blatantly provided. Like how are you not doing all of this and only part of it?
-
@SasukeKun said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2478532#Comment_2478532
Well thank you for reading my post and i see what you mean but at the same time, if there's no challenge to begin with or even set up to be a challenge, why even? Survivor is just becoming more and more of a joke, but i know how you feel about wanting to forget a short match.
What i wanted is the same, a strong feared killer that is escapable but not a joke, guess that's too much to ask for
It's certainly a tough balance. I hope in a game for everyone to have a satisfying level of interaction and fun. I know that goes against what some others want, especially from a killer perspective. Some killers want to dominate and kill survivors fast which is not fun. It's a tough nut to crack and I'm no game developer...
-
@meatisadelicacy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2478084#Comment_2478084
Just had a Raccoon game like an hour ago. All of us walked up to the killer and killed ourselves to get out.
Ha. Apparently, from the comments in this thread, it's reactivated but not noted in the patch notes.... ? I guess everyone should be looking at this thread to know that this map is now active...
Which maps are active and inactive is seemingly pretty important to the community, @MandyTalk. Maybe something more solid in the future so people know what's going on? RCPD just kind of came back without notice... Or did some of us miss something?
-
I want to disagree with you but I fundamentally can't.
It's too bad that issues cropped up with the sound files. Very frustrating as I know some were looking forward to them.
I have always felt that the PTB was really just a showcase period. In the case of this new killer, it does seem like they made quite a few adjustments. I do feel like they were mostly bug related adjustments, though. It feels like a lot of the feedback didn't really translate.
Killers come out weak. I would much rather have the new killer be overwhelming then get dialed back rather than coming out weak and being dialed up. That being said, I suppose they would be accused of trying to get people to spend money early and then watering down the killer and 'changing what they sold,' so the only option to counter whiners is to come out weak and try to build up.
In many ways I want a game where the killer is overwhelming and survivors really feel like they are likely not to survive like in a movie but... I don't see how that can be fun. When I go against a killer much better than myself, it's only a short, frustrating match that I want to forget about. So I guess I just always want to be the last standing survivor....
-
@Brokenbones said:
What's game share?
Yeah, kinda sorta sounds like you're both trying to play on one purchase which wouldn't be allowed, I'm sure.
-
@Bjario said:
Worst ability in the game. I'm not even gonna rant about it or give some constructive critism because it will be ignored as everything else we said about him on the PTB.
I'm actually fuming I spent money on this killer.
Are you fuming at yourself, though, that you spent that money?
There are tons of sources out there on how the killer plays and there will be tons more now that it's live. If you bought right out of the gate and you're prone to buyer's remorse, that's on you.
I bought Nemesis and I've played him like... twice. Maybe someday, but I just prefer to have all the content available.
-
It WOULD be more valuable if there was a way to let players know IN GAME about something like this.
A lot of people don't read patch notes and so forth. It's a busy world...
-
Dead dawg is disabled.
The Game is disabled.
Racoon City is dsiabled.
Using any of these offerings will not work.
Also, offerings are never 100% chance, even on enabled maps.
-
This was the most hilarious thing I read in the patch notes. I was amazed.