SloppyKnockout
SloppyKnockout
About
- Username
- SloppyKnockout
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
While I agree that can happen to an extent (I truly believe people do this with Freddy, either that or they are just really bad because he is easy to loop), I don't think people did that with Nurse. Nurse did need some adjustments. Did she need them to the extent she got? Probably not, but it did weed out the Nurse players who quite simply, weren't that good.
As for Deathslinger, he does need a downside to being able to spam M2 and fake his power constantly. That kind of zero effort, free zoning shouldn't exist.
-
@skarsguts said:
Undying + Ruin = new small PP build.
Anyways, blame the way killers play for survivors running these builds. If camping and tunneling is a "legitimate strategy", then so is running DS + Unbreakable.
But at the same time, you can blame tunneling/camping on survivors, as well.
-
@ClickyClicky said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1629185#Comment_1629185
1) It’s not instant.
2) It would kill him at loops.
3) Huntress has a completely different power. Hers is fully ranged and she can freely aim. PH has limited range and limited turning. Comparing them is pointless, it would be like me saying “Huntress can quickly combo an M2 into an M1, why can’t Pyramid?” Different powers.
4) Pig again different power. Hers takes away her terror radius. Thats how stealth killers were back then, they got to sneak up on survivors but had a pause so survivors had a chance to react. Then they made Ghostface....
5) Demogorgan is trash so that kind of proves the point.
DemoPls is not trash. You're just trash with him.
-
@Cerebral_Harlot said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/discussion/comment/1626669#Comment_1626669
Tbh i dont see the difference between necroing an old thread or making a new one. Plus it lets people new on the fourms have a chance to talk about this.
(it wouldn't have been necroing an old thread - at the time the comment was made, there were several on page 1, which is why you shouldn't retroactively reply to things, it makes you look silly)
-
bye
-
@Boss said:
Is it also consumed if no Realm modifiers have been used?
Yes.
-
@normalusername said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/discussion/comment/1612046#Comment_1612046
If there's so many threads about this topic, maybe that means the devs should take a look into at least one of them?
I don't see how that counters my point at all. My point was literally that this could have been put in one of the existing 15 billion Spirit threads.
I mean...yeah, not sure where your head was at, there.
-
The question may as well be "Is it fair for either side to do their objective?"
The answer to both is yes.
-
@InsidiousSmartfaceLF said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1615080#Comment_1615080
Did they nerf the God pallets on the Asylum and the balconies on Haddonfield yet?
No to Haddonfield, and "not really" to Asylum.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614638#Comment_1614638
What argument is that?
I'm sorry, you can't tunnel with other killers or what i'm supposed to get from this comment? Here's a better understanding of your comment:
"If they take away the ability to negate DS, I can't play scummy anymore and not give a single F about half of the survivor perks !"
"He'll immediately be F" tier - So.... going with this....Nurse, Spirit, Freddy, are three of the strongest killers in the game. They don't negate DS. Are they weak because they can't negate it? Nurse being the strongest killer in the game if played right is F tier because she can't counter DS?
The exaggeration in your comment is insane...
The main complaint was about him not having any drawbacks to faking his power. They'll most likely keep the same counter to DS. What they'll probably do is make BT work with cages and once you're rescued from a cage your exhaustion will be refilled, so now you don't feel like a fish out of water when PH decides to come to the cage. "But he can't see cages !" If PH has half a brain working, he'll know you're gonna be on the other side of the map where you've been sent from.
Do yourself a huge favor, and actually READ my post instead of throwing a tantrum. Notice the "cocky DS plays" part (it's not tunneling if they are idiots and force/bait me to go after them - if they don't want to be tunneled, they should be running away). Only when you read what I actually said are you allowed to have an opinion on it, and potentially throw another tantrum of uninformed ambiguity.
Hop to it. :)
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614791#Comment_1614791
These things were not left ambiguous, at all. Every referenced relationship is heterosexual. You should read the lore more carefully, starting with Sally's.
Every referenced relationship. To which there's....how many? Not a lot, really. As compared to the majority that haven't really been delved into at all.
But okay. Sure. lol
-
This thread is fake news.
-
@Siberia said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614358#Comment_1614358
where did you read that?
I heard it in a video from TheKing. He's a fog whisperer so I mean...reliable? o.O Who knows? lol
-
@SleepyWillo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614777#Comment_1614777
Well lets just take this as an opportunity for a fresh start! As I said, if you have a different opinion on the characters I'd love to hear what you think and how they got to that opinion.
My opinion has been stated, multiple times.
These things were left ambiguous for this very reason. So we could determine and identify with this ######### for ourselves. Your Felix is gay. My Felix is PewDiePie (he's from Sweden as well!). But slapping on a definition based on *how they look* is disgusting.
-
@SleepyWillo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614736#Comment_1614736
Dude - can you either add to the topic or just leave? All you seem to be doing is trying to pick a fight with OP...
If you have a different opinion on the characters by all means post them - most would like to hear what others think and how they got to their opinion. Lets just stay on topic, okay?
I tried to add to the thread a long time ago - until I was vilified for disagreeing with the OP. If you can't handle alternative opinions and ideas, again, don't post. Period.
-
I bet if you get in your DeLorean, and go back to mid-2018 when the sound issues initially started to get really ridiculous...and ask the same question...in 2 years it still won't be fixed.
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614635#Comment_1614635
Here you go again lmfaoo.. I never specifically labeled anyone as homophobic and I never called anyone toxic.. and yes ppl have called me names including you in the paragraph above multiple times lol.. I never took personal offense but I was attacked plenty of times and other ppl even stated this.. also you have attacked me on the topic since comment 1.. also there is no logic.. it simply a game and me sharing my opinon on who I thought could possibly be gay.. the only person taking offense is you and the plenty of other people that have a problem with my opinon.. if you don’t agree you don’t have to comment.. yet you have at least 5+ times.. my attitude has been calm throughout this entire situation.. up until my comment before this.. but only because your loosely based reasoning and abnoxious/continuous comments
Here you go again. LAMOW.
I didn't call you any names, by the way. Virtue signaller isn't a name, it's a term; and it's literally, by definition, what you were doing.
But hey - continue judging people by their appearance. I'll be the non judgmental one here.
-
@CountVampyr said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614629#Comment_1614629
Did I say that was the only reason? No, I didn’t, so don’t jump to stupid conclusions. But clearly if people are going to rage quit the first time they go down then they must think they deserve to have the round go there own way. There are legitimate reasons to disconnect. Just because the killer caught you isn’t one of them.
Did i say DCing for illegitimate reasons? No.
See? two can play at the "don't put words in my mouth" game.
-
If they take away his ability to negate cocky DS plays, he'll immediately be F tier.
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614611#Comment_1614611
The fact you keep coming back and saying the same old ######### bruh.. these characters ARENT REAL how else are you supposed to know if they are gay or not.. reading lore, looking at their style and how they act is the only way you can determine if this character may or may not be gay.. you clearly are against gay even being an aspect and using cheap tactics to make me out as the bad guy THESE ARE CHARACTERS.. it’s wrong to assume REAL PEOPLE to be gay by their looks or actions but these people are MADE UP! please stop commenting the same ridiculous posts because you have a problem with thought of a character possibly being gay
Same old #########? Like you? Labeling people as homophobes and toxic because they disagree with you? Or like you, lying about using "the lore" to come up with your preferences? Taking it as a personal offense or attack everytime someone has a different opinion? Nobody has attacked you here, or called you names etc. You've been nothing but condescending and all over the place with your logic.
Nobody is disagreeing with your belief system. They are disagreeing with your attitude.
-
@CountVampyr said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614535#Comment_1614535
How do you go about fixing a person’s sense of entitlement?
If you think the only reason people DC is entitlement, you're seriously out of touch with the community.
-
@SleepyWillo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614576#Comment_1614576
OP wasn't, at least for the most part, getting hate for their opinions. They were getting hate for merely bringing up the topic. A topic the devs themselves have said they'd be addressing in the near future. OP hasn't had issue with people having dissimilar opinions and has remained polite and tolerant throughout. The issue is that OP has been getting aggro on a topic that the devs themselves have raised. Very few people have actually voiced any opinion on the topic and seem to be attacking OP for merely raising the issue the devs originally brought up...
But thats just my opinion...
They didn't get hate for bringing up the topic. They got hate for blatant virtue signalling; and defining people on how they look (which is absolutely abhorrent behavior). Veiling it as "i used the lore!" when the lore doesn't even touch these matters. The second they were confronted with actual logic, people confronting them were homophobic. Absolutely shameful behavior. That victim mentality is what continues to create homophobic people, because the world has had enough of that virtue signalling crap.
They are the bad guy here.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614595#Comment_1614595
No, theres always some scary monster. I said horror aspect not full episode. Also, the Ash we have is from Ash VS Evil Dead. Which is Horror Comedy.
Horror comedy, based on a full on horror franchise (and is actually canon).
Come on, friend. You're only strengthening my argument here.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614579#Comment_1614579
Difference is Simpsons is primarily a comedy show and those episodes are few and far between, Like every episode in Doctor Who has some horror aspect to it. And is DBD primarily a slasher game? Yes. Were the last two licenses we got Stranger Things and Silent Hill? Also yes.
Those episodes are once a season. Not exactly "few and far between". Doctor Who is primarily a drama, and horror episodes are actually few and far between.
Silent Hill and Stranger Things are PRIMARILY horror intellectual properties. They work. Doctor Who does not. You're making zero coherent argument here.
So, my point still stands.
-
@SoylentPixie said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614472#Comment_1614472
"Now that i have people who agree with me, i feel safe to brand everyone who didn't agree with me as homophobic"
Bisexual myself by the way.
I find people who throw around the homophobia word casually like that, just as f***ing bad as the actual homphobes. It cheapens the word beyond measure and you have absoloutley no idea the actual sexuality or beliefs of anyone in this forum. You're just pissed everyone isn't agreeing with your head cannon.
Pretty despicable to be throwing homophobic around like a two dollar word on an internet forum because people don't want to play your game.
Pretty much. That's how virtue signallers argue.
Also bisexual by the way. A bisexual indigenous man engaged to a bisexual woman. I'm 35 years old - I've been dealing with the toxicity far longer than they have, I bet. They think it's bad NOW? Super KEK. Much WOW.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614530#Comment_1614530
Could you at least explain yourself?
DBD is a horror game, but it's also a game that lives through the slasher film genre. Nothing about Doctor Who fits in that. Doctor Who in DBD makes zero sense. That's like saying "Add the Simpsons because of the treehouse of horrors episodes".
-
DC penalties aren't the answer. FIxing the ######### that makes people want to DC is.
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614502#Comment_1614502
Been playing this game since it came out and yet I don't know what kind of game it is.
At least you admit it.
:D
-
@SCP_FOR_DBD said:
I just binged a lot and am massively sleep deprived. It has plenty of horror focused episodes to pull from. Obviously there would be better licences for now but I think it could make a decent chapter later down the line. What do you guys think?
I don't think you know what kind of game DBD is.
-
@Customapple0 said:
Funny how Blight has an add on that reveals auras just by smacking the wall yet the aura addons for Deathslinger & Pyramid Head are Iri and are way too situational (and in PH’s case, too many conditions) to even get decent use out of them.
I wonder who does the balancing!?
Blight also has very little control in his power. So, I mean, there's a huge trade off.
-
@Siberia said:
So I know they’ve done graphic updates to the maps, but does anyone know when the same will be done to the characters? I heard it’s going to be 2 parts (first for maps, second for characters) but I dunno if there’s any truth to that. Just looking for clarification.
Didn't they mention that was being done with the next patch?
-
@Kisagi1990 said:
Even without a Mori, Ohm would wreck all of you so dont ######### about the Mori. :/
This.
OhmWrecker is like the original DBD streamer pretty much. He knows the game very well, and he's very good at it. You guys never had a chance, mori or not.
-
LOCKED SETS SHOULD COST LESS. THEY ARE FUNDAMENTALLY WORTH LESS BECAUSE THEY HAVE LESS VALUE.
There. I said it.
-
@Moundshroud said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614268#Comment_1614268
Isn't that what I just said? :)
Nope. You said whenever they feel like it's tactically wise. I'm saying it's perfectly justified even when they just feel like camping, knowing it's not tactically wise.
-
@Domo1_ said:
Justified camping is after all 5 gens are finished. making sure a survivors goes into stage 2 if they're really close isn't camping either imo
@Moundshroud said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1613312#Comment_1613312
Justified camping is whenever the Killer feels it is tactically wise. They are not bots. They have agency, and just like you desire to make their own choices. The only thing that proves the value of the camping is the end results, i.e. did the tactic produce a winning game. In short, they don't have to justify their choices to you or anyone else. You don't have to justify what Perks you take or the choices you make in game either.
In short, you do you and let other Players (Killer and Survivor alike) do them.
Actually - justified camping is any time the killer camps. There is no rule book. They can do what they want. Their job is to murder survivors. Therefore, if they choose camping to get the job done, it's justified.
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614171#Comment_1614171
how many times are you gonna post on this thread? Every post is the same thing.. and every time I respond by saying the same thing to you WHATS IT MATTER HOW I GOT IT?! ITS SIMPLY ONE PERSON ON THE INTERNETS OPINON ABOUT A FRICKIN VIDEO GAME
How many times are you going to post in this thread? Odd question o.O
-
@wownicedeadhard said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614178#Comment_1614178
read the other comments homie, and stop being negative😁
Stop being negative...in a thread...where the title is literally a negative...
You must mean "stop disagreeing with me". In which case, no.
Maybe you should stop being negative. You made the negative thread, Captain Negativity.
-
@wownicedeadhard said:
I don't know if he's the worst but his definitely one of the worst, and its not even his power (mostly) its how the maps are made; 80% of the time you get stuck on some random object. I've played around 8 hours of him 5 on PC and 3 on PS4 and honestly how did they expect console players to aim with him, they def need to add a sensitivity option on him. Also can y'all please keep the token mechanic constant? When Bubba uses a token the entire meter goes down and it has to recharge all the way to get a token back, but with Blight each section on the meter is a token, like what. anyway yeah he has compound 21 but hes still really bad. I see two solutions either they give him a rework or the fix all the map hitboxes.
Correction: Thread title should read "I'm not good with Blight"
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614090#Comment_1614090
The problem here is, is how offended so many people are over a little representation..
Nobody is offended about representation. People are bothered by the fact that you're pulling these things quite literally out of your rectal cavity. Saying they are based on "lore", when the lore mentions jack diddly succotash as relates to anything about sexual preference. People are bothered by your broken logic, and it makes you look like you created this thread just to virtue signal.
Representation has NOTHING to do with it.
-
He...has...one...
-
@immortalls96 said:
I had a similar idea..only the last guy can be straight killed..and each killer should have their own earnable death hook mori
I'll be okay with it not just being mori on death hook as long as DS becomes something survivors have to earn.
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614092#Comment_1614092
Liking a certain color is preference lol but someone’s personality and style definitely can show your sexuality.. example - MOST straight men don’t wear makeup or crop tops some maybe straight but a majority aren’t..
Again - personality/style and sexual preference are not linked. At all. How do you know straight men don't wear make up? Did you go and ask the majority of them? Maybe they won't even tell you because YOU WILL LITERALLY JUDGE THEM based on that.
You're judging by appearance and mannerisms, and that's absolutely despicable.
I am convinced you created this thread for the sole purpose of baiting people. You keep saying "read the lore", when the lore mentions NOTHING about sexual preference. It's a big run around with you.
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614083#Comment_1614083
Lore as in there actions, style and personality..
Personality and style do not designate sexual preference. That's like saying "that guy likes pink! must be into dudes!". That's an awful way of thinking.
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614070#Comment_1614070
again I used lore.. and again it’s my opinion.. have u never had an opinion backed by other people’s opinion?
No you didn't. There's little to nothing in their lore that would suggest their sexuality at all - aside from them being in predesignated relationships. You can't say "I used lore" when it's not IN the lore. That's not it.
What you're doing (and it's okay!) is choosing these designations in your own preferential way. Which is 100% fine. It's left ambiguous for that reason, as I said. Just don't BS us by saying "it's the lore!" when there's nothing there to go off of.
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614057#Comment_1614057
this was simply my take on the topic.. again everything stated here was simply MY opinon.. that was stated in the texted and multiple times to other ppl
But in your replies you're not presenting it as "your opinion". You're using words like "the majority of the community agrees" as if that's supposed to add water to your theory.
I don't care what their sexuality is; and it's quite obvious you're basing these things PURELY off of how their appearance, which is an absolutely AWFUL thing to do.
-
@CEO_Of_Jane said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1614035#Comment_1614035
Felix had a girlfriend correction.. and a majority of the community agrees that Felix defenitly isn’t straight not to mention lore making a point to say he frequently drank and partied whos to say he hasn’t expiremented during that time too but anyways... meg, dewight, Kate, David and nea all have very popular gay ships or are just popularly assumes to be lgbt..
Agree based on what though? lol
What does "the majority agreeing" mean? Does that make it more true? Answer: No it doesn't.
These things are left ambiguous for a reason, lol
-
I'm unsure why the sexuality of a character with like 3 paragraphs of actual written lore in a video game where they are literally meant to die matters. All of this is based off appearances...and I mean, judging people by how they look is kind of scummy.
-
I learned a long time ago - no matter which side you play, killer or survivor, the side you're against, 9 times out of 10, doesn't give a crap if you're having fun.
So, play to win. Do what you need to. Killer or survivor. There's no rulebook, and anyone who tries to shame you is just a salty nerd.
-
@Bradyguy99 said:
Were they changed this update? They seem super fast. Thoughts?
They weren't changed. You're just imagining things.
-
Please fix *insert one of 8045830958430958305348 bugs here* in next hotfix. I agree.
I personally think a patch dedicated to bug fixes in place of a new DLC would be fantastic, tbh