Orion
Orion
About
- Username
- Orion
- Joined
- Visits
- 124
- Last Active
Comments
-
@AshleyWB said:
If you have 4% chance to escape hook and 5 attempts. You have a 20% chance to escape the hook. Am I right?That's not how it works. You need to use a binomial distribution.
-
I found the perk to be quite useful on my Wraith, but then I run an... unconventional build.
-
The Nightmare. I love everything about him except how underpowered he is.
-
@switch said:
@Orion said:
@switch said:
@Orion said:
@switch said:
You just got very lucky the base chance is 4% and slippery meat adds 3 more attempts.
Honestly i used that with up the ante and didnt manage to get off the hook in 5 games.
Don't recommend RNG builds since its just pure LUCKThe odds of getting off with 3 chances (default) is 11.5%, give or take.
The odds of getting off with 6 chances is 21.7%, give or take.It makes a big difference.
from where did you get those numbers ? your mind ?
Slippery meat does not affect the hook odds it just for 3 more attempts.
The base % of escaping from the hook by yourself is 4.
Again thos is pure RANDOM NUMBER GENERATED aka luck.
You can escape without slippery meat 100 times, or you can die with slippery meat 100 times.
I'm confused on how did you get those numbers.Binomial distribution with a 0.04 (4%) chance of success. 3 trials for the first number, 6 for the second number. Used Stat Trek's Binomial Probability Calculator here: https://stattrek.com/online-calculator/binomial.aspx for quick results.
In short, I pulled them out of my knowledge of statistics, instead of your ignorance of them.
Again im going to say this. it doesn't change the fact that its all based on LUCK.
Even with 21% chace you can still die 100 times out of 100.
I was telling to the OP that he just got lucky, instead of relying on RNG you're better off runing normal perks.
I ignore everything that is based on luck since for someone could work 100% of the times and for others could work 0% of the time.On average, it'll work 21.7% of the time, if you use all 6 attempts. The question is, is the payoff good enough for it to be worth the risk? If you're getting hooked a lot, it might be.
-
@switch said:
@Orion said:
@switch said:
You just got very lucky the base chance is 4% and slippery meat adds 3 more attempts.
Honestly i used that with up the ante and didnt manage to get off the hook in 5 games.
Don't recommend RNG builds since its just pure LUCKThe odds of getting off with 3 chances (default) is 11.5%, give or take.
The odds of getting off with 6 chances is 21.7%, give or take.It makes a big difference.
from where did you get those numbers ? your mind ?
Slippery meat does not affect the hook odds it just for 3 more attempts.
The base % of escaping from the hook by yourself is 4.
Again thos is pure RANDOM NUMBER GENERATED aka luck.
You can escape without slippery meat 100 times, or you can die with slippery meat 100 times.
I'm confused on how did you get those numbers.Binomial distribution with a 0.04 (4%) chance of success. 3 trials for the first number, 6 for the second number, solving for P(X≥x). Used Stat Trek's Binomial Probability Calculator here: https://stattrek.com/online-calculator/binomial.aspx for quick results.
In short, I pulled them out of my knowledge of statistics, instead of your ignorance of them.
-
@switch said:
You just got very lucky the base chance is 4% and slippery meat adds 3 more attempts.
Honestly i used that with up the ante and didnt manage to get off the hook in 5 games.
Don't recommend RNG builds since its just pure LUCKThe odds of getting off with 3 chances (default) is 11.5%, give or take.
The odds of getting off with 6 chances is 21.7%, give or take.It makes a big difference.
-
@EpicFailTryHard said:
so many things that are simply unfair in this world. i have elected to suck my thumb and hope for the best. someone hold me?Aren't you gonna buy me dinner first?
-
@Beardedragon said:
@TheXenoborg said:
Beardedragon said:how does one get 99k bloodpoints?
Edit: never mind. you got 49k. i thought the total was total from the match
Double bp offerings, perks like BBQ etc
wait i was wrong in my edit?
did that entire match get 99k? i dont think ive gotten that much before even from a 4k
BP offerings are a magical thing. Use them as much as possible.
-
I'd go one step further and say it should be FP (or at least an FoV lock) during any interaction, focused on the thing you're interacting with.
-
@Beardedragon said:
@Paddy4583 said:
Beardedragon said:@Orion said:
@Beardedragon said:
@Master said:
@Beardedragon said:
@Paddy4583 said:
mzombie1431 said:
@MegaWaffle @inkedsoulz. This was entirely to start a discussion and I actually like the idea of speeding up the progression if the killer goes away. It is a decent compromise, maybe not 2 or 3 times. Maybe a step up progression based on distance away.
Huntress and irredentist heads will be 9/10 killers,
DBD shooter mode enabled
or hillbilly distance camping. or hag.
distance camping
You survivors always manage to make me smile
you survivors? idiot, i play 80% killer so im a big killer main. why cant some of you dolts just realize that even though i play killer, i can still see when we go overboard with the nerfs? i really like the changes and nerfs to survivors this time, but this suggestion is just downright terrible.
and yes, thats coming from a killer main.
maybe before you consider me a "survivor" you should actually check out my posts in which i defend killers against survivors in different posts.
i mention distance camping because ive done it numerous times, specially now with the new hag. you just plant 3 traps around the hooks which will get sprung when they try to rescue. i just teleport back in, kill the guy and rehook him. its not hard.
by definition im still camping the hook, just not at it.
That's not the definition of camping, at all. You've been brainwashed by entitled Survivors.
i have not. whether you want to call it camping or not i dont give a damn.
it changes nothing about this suggestion, which is terrible.
why in your right mind would you believe that its correct to have 2x faster progression speed on hooks just because you are not standing near the hook?
The idea is truly awful, however in a social environment the definitions of words do matter as they have a global meaning and understanding.
On this environment we wouldn’t consider trapping a hook and leaving as camping. That’s why people didn’t understand you and why you were perceived as a survivor.maybe. but a hillbilly having a clear running line to a hook with a chainsaw that can reach the place in 5 seconds with the chainsaw rush, is still a camper even if he, by definiton, isnt so close to the hooked guy that he could smell their farts.
if he ran normally, the guy would get down, and they could run off, thus he's probably outside of "camping radius" but with the chainsaw? he's gonna get there super fast and gib those guys. he's still camping, but he's outside camping radius.
what do we wanna call that? semi camping?
So you do define "camping" as anything that doesn't allow a free escape. You're either lying about being a Killer main or were brainwashed by Survivors.
-
@Master said:
@Beardedragon said:
@Master said:
@Beardedragon said:
@Paddy4583 said:
mzombie1431 said:@MegaWaffle @inkedsoulz. This was entirely to start a discussion and I actually like the idea of speeding up the progression if the killer goes away. It is a decent compromise, maybe not 2 or 3 times. Maybe a step up progression based on distance away.
Huntress and irredentist heads will be 9/10 killers,
DBD shooter mode enabledor hillbilly distance camping. or hag.
distance camping
You survivors always manage to make me smile
you survivors? idiot, i play 80% killer so im a big killer main. why cant some of you dolts just realize that even though i play killer, i can still see when we go overboard with the nerfs? i really like the changes and nerfs to survivors this time, but this suggestion is just downright terrible.
and yes, thats coming from a killer main.
maybe before you consider me a "survivor" you should actually check out my posts in which i defend killers against survivors in different posts.
i mention distance camping because ive done it numerous times, specially now with the new hag. you just plant 3 traps around the hooks which will get sprung when they try to rescue. i just teleport back in, kill the guy and rehook him. its not hard.
by definition im still camping the hook, just not at it.
Do you understand what a camper is? Its a guy who sets up a tent and waits in there for a pleb to come by and shoot him.
Now I ask you, patroling the gens while "distance camping", how is that possible? Are you carrying your tent with you? Maybe you should call it caravaning
Oh and I dont care how many times you state that you are such a might killermain, you act like a survivor, but in the end that doesnt rlly matter.
Distance camping..... no words
"Yes, I was waiting in front of the hook, but actually I was also on the other end of the map, chasing a Survivor."
10/10, would distance camp again. -
@Beardedragon said:
@Master said:
@Beardedragon said:
@Paddy4583 said:
mzombie1431 said:@MegaWaffle @inkedsoulz. This was entirely to start a discussion and I actually like the idea of speeding up the progression if the killer goes away. It is a decent compromise, maybe not 2 or 3 times. Maybe a step up progression based on distance away.
Huntress and irredentist heads will be 9/10 killers,
DBD shooter mode enabledor hillbilly distance camping. or hag.
distance camping
You survivors always manage to make me smile
you survivors? idiot, i play 80% killer so im a big killer main. why cant some of you dolts just realize that even though i play killer, i can still see when we go overboard with the nerfs? i really like the changes and nerfs to survivors this time, but this suggestion is just downright terrible.
and yes, thats coming from a killer main.
maybe before you consider me a "survivor" you should actually check out my posts in which i defend killers against survivors in different posts.
i mention distance camping because ive done it numerous times, specially now with the new hag. you just plant 3 traps around the hooks which will get sprung when they try to rescue. i just teleport back in, kill the guy and rehook him. its not hard.
by definition im still camping the hook, just not at it.
That's not the definition of camping, at all. You've been brainwashed by entitled Survivors.
-
When you grow up, I hope you learn that insulting people only makes them disregard you and your opinions.
-
@xxaggieboyxx said:
It kinda is an exploit because it renders flashlight saves completely useless(not defending flashlighters or anything just saying it's an exploit)Maybe it's a timing issue on the Survivor part. Dropping Survivors is not an exploit.
-
@xxaggieboyxx said:
If someone tries to blind you just spam the button to drop the survivor and you won't get stunned and the downed survivor will be dropped on the ground but not get awaySo dropping Survivors to prevent them from getting away is now an exploit? Jesus H. Christ.
-
FPS has nothing to do with servers. Are you talking about lag? Dedicated servers wouldn't necessarily solve those either, since ######### connections don't magically become awesome with dedicated servers.
-
@Someissues said:
@Orion said:
32 meters is too big, there's a bunch of stuff to be done 32 meters away from the hook, and you shouldn't have the ability to see the Killer 24/7 at that distance. If you want to see the Killer's aura, Kindred is the only way to go. You want to punish camping? Do generators and convince every Survivor to do the same, because until camping stops being rewarded, campers will not go away.Something needs to be done so Survivors won't have exucse when it comes to camping, otherwise have fun getting blocked with everyone dodging of your games at high ranked cuz you played Nurse, with major excuses on camping and such
The only excuse Survivors need is "git gud", and it's not even an excuse. Don't want to be camped? Stop rewarding campers. It's that simple.
-
@hMM said:
They already hit survivors hard. If you've seen dead by daylight's recent reviews in steam you'll be sure to think again. They are frustrated and mad because of this update. Maybe that's the reason to all the quitting?Doesn't make it OK to screw over their teammates. If they're mad they suck without their crutch perks, then maybe they should play better.
-
@Beardedragon said:
@Orion said:
@Beardedragon said:
@Orion said:
"Distance camping", lol.well a hillbilly can get the faster progression and just charge in with a chainsaw.
Which isn't camping, unless you define "camping" as "not a free unhook", although I know many Survivors do just that...
i know its not camping, but this way you get the progression buff and you can still keep the guy on the hook safe. how is that fair to survivors?
Define "fair". Is it only "fair" if Survivors get to do whatever they want without any risk? There's stuff you can do to prevent a Hillbilly from mowing you down with his chainsaw, why don't you try that? Better yet, if you know the Hillbilly is keeping an eye on the hooked Survivor, why don't you do something against that instead of complaining that it's not "fair" to you that he's countering your save?
-
I love it. Hit 'em where it hurts.
-
@Someissues said:
@Orion said:
Use Kindred.Kindred is trash cuz a Killer can easily go beyond 16m and no one uses it at High Ranked
It would only be a good perk if it has 32 meters, but again this is something which the game should have from the beginning, shouldn't be a perk at all
32 meters is too big, there's a bunch of stuff to be done 32 meters away from the hook, and you shouldn't have the ability to see the Killer 24/7 at that distance. If you want to see the Killer's aura, Kindred is the only way to go. You want to punish camping? Do generators and convince every Survivor to do the same, because until camping stops being rewarded, campers will not go away.
-
@Beardedragon said:
@Orion said:
"Distance camping", lol.well a hillbilly can get the faster progression and just charge in with a chainsaw.
Which isn't camping, unless you define "camping" as "not a free unhook", although I know many Survivors do just that...
-
Use Kindred.
-
"Distance camping", lol.
-
@Paddy4583 said:
I call to change the terms camping to fishing and tunneling to netting.And I call to change the term "altruistic Survivors" to "vultures".
-
@Beardedragon said:
@OakLestat said:
@Beardedragon said:
its a terrible idea. even 2x faster is a death sentence for survivors and im not even a survivor main.
do you know what my favorite strategy with the hag is? hook a guy, put 2 traps near it. now i dont even have to be around to camp hooks, i just teleport back in.
imagine how fast i would skewer survivors if it was 2x speed.
im sorry but increasing progression speed is a terrible idea for survivors.
You are right that Hag makes that an issue. But they could disable that for Hag if she has a trap within 10 meters of the hook.
I would be fine with the opposite as well that while a killer is within 10-15 meters of the hook (and not in a chase) then the time would go half as fast. Although perks like Insidious would have to counter act that effect.
no. never, ever. increased progression speed because the killer isnt near?
absolutely terrible.
there is already an incentive called: if you camp, you lose.
if he doesnt move away from that 1 guy he hooked at 5 gens, he will lose. unless the survivors [BAD WORD] up big time, then he might not lose.
we're not going to punish survivors, because the killer is doing what he can to win, which is patrol generators. thats just silly.
I find that camping works more often than not. Camping made me go from a 1k game into a 4k game at rank 12 or something.
-
There's no way to prove anyone did it on purpose, so you won't get banned. Personally, I just didn't use it.
-
@Sn0wJob said:
@MineAntoiya said:
Can be broken instantaneously after the beginning of a match. I played a match of clown where I looked around for the totem. Was on the other side of the map in plain sight. Was almost there when I see a Claudette jump on it. These totem spots need fixing.
Despite the totem being found in 12 seconds even, that is still twelve seconds of no gen rushing and people scrambling to find it.
Time is literally so precious we'll take any amount of distraction versus an immediate gen rush.Except Survivors don't scramble to find it, because it's basically irrelevant.
-
I think it's fine the way it is now. Insidious is barely used because of how weak it is, why nerf it indirectly like that? Just don't rescue if you see the Killer has Insidious.
-
@inkedsoulz said:
@mzombie1431 said:
Here is an idea for a change in the game, I know this is gonna catch alot of flack by player that play like this but let face it if you depend on tunneling and camping you're pretty much ######### at the game anyways so those opinions won't bother me.
I think there should be per say a timer for in which a killer can't hook a survivor again with out a penalty to the killer or no penalty to the survior. My idea is basically if a killer downs a survivor immediately off hook and then re-hooks that same survivor it should be counted at the previous hook not a second if done in a certain time frame. This would deter farming and tuneling. It wouldn't eliminate it but it would give survivors a weapon against this type of play.
Second Camping: I think that a system should be in place that if a killer doesn't break a certain radius , can't be the terror radius cause its different from killer to killer, that hook degradation for the survivor is stopped or dramatically slowed down. The emblem system wasn't enough to stop this type of gameplay mostly because survivors need to be altruistic to build that emblem to pip. 1 survivor save ,1 gen, 9min alive= 1 pip 9 or pretty close. No save pretty much no pip just a safety. This really won't hurt the good players that play good and don't need to camp. It would be just forcing players that play a ######### style of play to get better.
This is is just my opinion and I know that it may not be liked by some, but its just an opinion and idea.Why not instead of punishing the killer for staying at the hook, we reward him for leaving the hook.
If killer stays at the hook, normal progression speed.
If killer leaves hook, x3 hook progression speed.Like this, if the killer wants kills fast, he better leaves the hook and not camp.
No killer will camp if they implement this
easy camping fix.I suggested that, but Survivors complained it was "too OP". They don't want solutions that don't involve letting them do whatever they want.
-
How do Killers exploit Decisive Strike or Flashlights?
FYI, Survivors blocking the hook is considered an exploit for the same reason face camping was an exploit - it blocked an interaction. -
Why I camp:
Today I had some very ######### trials as Killer, mainly thanks to the map (######### corn), wherein I would've gotten 1 kill or even 0 kills. In all but one, camping not only ensured me that 1 kill, but it got me more. Sometimes just one more, sometimes two, sometimes even three (yes, 4k from what should've been a 1k trial). Why? Because Survivors halted all generator progress to run around the hook like vultures. Some actually tried to unhook right in my face and paid the price.
Camping only works because of Survivors. If you want to stop camping, stop rewarding it.
-
@Russ76 said:
Not a killer main so you may want to discard my response, but I would rather play as Freddy. at high ranks (lvl 18 -20) he is in my opinion overpowered. I have heard he doesn't scale well. Going to try to main killer after next reset so may change my answer.Those are low ranks. High ranks have the smaller numbers.
-
Wraith. I'd like to be able to hit Survivors when I find them, and not 7 seconds later.
-
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Beardedragon said:
it werent just bad killers who were flashlighted when trying to pick up targets.im glad the pickup timers were reduced.
Sorry dude. Bad, new or made a mistake in that moment.
Perfect excuse to dismiss any possibility that you might just be wrong. Circular logic FTW!
If I'm wrong I happily admit it. This is an occasion where I am not wrong.
Except that you've already taken out that possibility. A Killer who gets hit by a flashlight, in your eyes, is either bad, new, or made a mistake. There's no "proving you wrong" because you've already decided you're not.
Then why do so many killers that are good, NOT have a problem dealing with flashlights, both before and after the update? It's only bad killers, new killers or killers that have made a mistake in that moment that can't handle it.
Thank you for proving my point. Because you've already established (in your mind) that only bad Killers, new Killers, or Killers who made a mistake get blinded, you can dismiss any and all evidence to the contrary, no matter what evidence is presented. That's a closed mind if I've ever seen one.
Riiiight. It's a fact. You not accepting it as such is proof of a closed mind. You can have your own opinions, not your own facts.
If you don't even consider that good Killers might not make a mistake and still get blinded, you're the one with the closed mind. You can say they're "facts" all you like, it won't make it true.
One of my points was, if you read correctly... "bad, new, or made a mistake in that moment"
Yes, and my point is that you will dismiss any and all good Killers who get blinded as having made a mistake. You're looking for excuses that fit your narrative, instead of considering that the narrative itself might be wrong. If you're not rational enough to see your circular logic for what it is, then there's no point arguing with you further. Enjoy the echo chamber of your mind.
-
@slingshotsurvivor said:
Lol you are triggered by a word. Yet you didn't even read what was written. So you must agree then since you entirely ignored the issue.The issue is relevant, but calling it a "hack" is going to undermine its significance.
-
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Beardedragon said:
it werent just bad killers who were flashlighted when trying to pick up targets.im glad the pickup timers were reduced.
Sorry dude. Bad, new or made a mistake in that moment.
Perfect excuse to dismiss any possibility that you might just be wrong. Circular logic FTW!
If I'm wrong I happily admit it. This is an occasion where I am not wrong.
Except that you've already taken out that possibility. A Killer who gets hit by a flashlight, in your eyes, is either bad, new, or made a mistake. There's no "proving you wrong" because you've already decided you're not.
Then why do so many killers that are good, NOT have a problem dealing with flashlights, both before and after the update? It's only bad killers, new killers or killers that have made a mistake in that moment that can't handle it.
Thank you for proving my point. Because you've already established (in your mind) that only bad Killers, new Killers, or Killers who made a mistake get blinded, you can dismiss any and all evidence to the contrary, no matter what evidence is presented. That's a closed mind if I've ever seen one.
Riiiight. It's a fact. You not accepting it as such is proof of a closed mind. You can have your own opinions, not your own facts.
If you don't even consider that good Killers might not make a mistake and still get blinded, you're the one with the closed mind. You can say they're "facts" all you like, it won't make it true.
-
If you'd ever streamed, you'd know that sometimes, ######### breaks, and you have no idea why.
-
@slingshotsurvivor said:
I meant hack aka Definition: a strategy or technique for managing one's time or activities more efficiently."there's one easy hack to avoid the eight dollar popcorn trap: eat before you get to the theater" OR "He's such a hack"Hacking in video games doesn't mean that, and you know it. Stop pretending otherwise.
-
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Beardedragon said:
it werent just bad killers who were flashlighted when trying to pick up targets.im glad the pickup timers were reduced.
Sorry dude. Bad, new or made a mistake in that moment.
Perfect excuse to dismiss any possibility that you might just be wrong. Circular logic FTW!
If I'm wrong I happily admit it. This is an occasion where I am not wrong.
Except that you've already taken out that possibility. A Killer who gets hit by a flashlight, in your eyes, is either bad, new, or made a mistake. There's no "proving you wrong" because you've already decided you're not.
Then why do so many killers that are good, NOT have a problem dealing with flashlights, both before and after the update? It's only bad killers, new killers or killers that have made a mistake in that moment that can't handle it.
Thank you for proving my point. Because you've already established (in your mind) that only bad Killers, new Killers, or Killers who made a mistake get blinded, you can dismiss any and all evidence to the contrary, no matter what evidence is presented. That's a closed mind if I've ever seen one.
-
@Speshul_Kitten said:
Saying it’s entirely up to the survivor THEN saying the killer can’t have MUCH control over is a dilemma in the statement you’re making. Which side are you on? I prefer the facts.It's not a dilemma. Killers don't pick the spots where Survivors end up before they're downed, nor do they make Survivors miss skill checks.
-
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Beardedragon said:
it werent just bad killers who were flashlighted when trying to pick up targets.im glad the pickup timers were reduced.
Sorry dude. Bad, new or made a mistake in that moment.
Perfect excuse to dismiss any possibility that you might just be wrong. Circular logic FTW!
If I'm wrong I happily admit it. This is an occasion where I am not wrong.
Except that you've already taken out that possibility. A Killer who gets hit by a flashlight, in your eyes, is either bad, new, or made a mistake. There's no "proving you wrong" because you've already decided you're not.
-
I could see this as a Prestige thing. At P3, all perks are instantly tier 3. P2, tier 2. P1, every Bloodweb has a perk.
-
@only1biggs said:
@Beardedragon said:
it werent just bad killers who were flashlighted when trying to pick up targets.im glad the pickup timers were reduced.
Sorry dude. Bad, new or made a mistake in that moment.
Perfect excuse to dismiss any possibility that you might just be wrong. Circular logic FTW!
-
@Speshul_Kitten said:
So by those standards the only way to miss DS is to have nerve damage, gotcha, not biased at all.It's a hyperbole. The success zone is too big to miss unless you're distracted by something else, or have some form of impairment, or your space bar/controller craps out on you (could happen).
-
@only1biggs said:
@Orion said:
@only1biggs said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@Orion said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@TheXenoborg You must be bad at the game.@Beardedragon What do I complain about exactly?
@Doom_Punk You're so stupid
Survivor main? More selective reading nonsense. I main killer you pleb. Jesus, don't you get tired of being wrong all the time? Moreover, unless the killer is a potato, it's not possible to get into position. If you think otherwise, you've played against awful killers with no brain. Maybe it's easy for rank 20's like yourself, but oh well.I do think otherwise, cause you're a console peasant. Flashlight saves would be a tiny bit harder to do on a controller.
It works for me when they're not looking at a wall cause I know the timing, and not all Survivors go down next to walls.
Oh my god what a moron!! Console peasant!? LOLOLOLOL Oh no, my feels, plez don't, no more :'D
Putting aside the fact that we have multiple rigs, laptops and consoles...i'm telling you, only dumb killers, or those not paying attention, or those who have just picked up the game, will be able to have someone flashlight save against them. I've made them too you dummy, my point is, it's only against idiots. But, you just use your selective reading skills to pick out whatever else you like here, while I continue to laugh at your "console peasant" line
Oh, I also have hours in console and PC :P
*circle of life music intensifies
And the funny thing is, you don't own the game on Steam on your account.
Unless of course you happen to bullshit your way through that one, I saw some posts you made on the Steam forums on your account and it shows you don't own the game, cause otherwise there'd be a mouse icon. Unless you prove it, then nice try buddy. And your profile is private either way
Thanks for some more ad hominem because you're terrible at flashlight saves and don't want to admit it. That's the stench of true failure right there. Only good Survivors will be able to pull them off now, oh, what's that, you thought you were good? Better start getting good then and less complaints that they're impossible like you and so many other Survivor mains.
LOLOLOLOL You are so, so stupid. So, so, so stupid. Just, next level.
I've made flashlight saves since the change too....against pleb killers.
Based on everything you have posted here (and probably other places), you're trash. Both as survivor and killer.
Anyway, continue being moronic. It's always amusing to hold you up like the idiot Simba you are :'D
More ad hom.
Been doing saves even on good Killers cause I know the timing and only if they're not near a wall, which most of the time Survivors intentionally go down away from walls.
As you're saying (while being a console peasant) that flash saves are impossible. Sounds like a very bad player to me. I have more hours than you do bud.
Stay salty for me man, keep going insulting me cause you have nothing better to add. There's plenty of trolls around anyways.
Obviously if you get flashlight saves they were bad Killers, because only bad Killers get blinded by flashlights. Circular logic at its finest.
^
Yeah those Killers sure were just bad, even having thousands of hours and chasing Survivors well. That type of logic comes from Survivor mains who pretend they main Killer.
All the while this guy is playing on a controller, LOL. What a complete joke. I seriously wonder what Killers he plays on console that he acts like he can kill any SWF team in the world, even Marth's team. Typical troll.
:'D
You two deserve each other. Carry on with your selective reading.
*edit - Oh, _and_ putting words in my mouth. Just amazing
Dude, every time someone points out a Killer who got blinded, you immediately claim they were bad. You said that flashlight saves only work against bad Killers. Excuse me if I'm using your own words against you.
Punk putting words in my mouth. How can you use my words against me if they are true?
Because you've already decided that any Killers against whom flashlight saves work are bad, which is a ridiculous premise in and of itself and leads to circular logic. Your words are not true any more than any other kind of circular logic.
-
@Speshul_Kitten said:
Everyone who is saying, “You can just cleanse totems” how about, you just play Dr, use Enduring and Unnerving Presence, that way you don’t complain about DS. I mean, how often does your NOED actually not end up being active compared to the times you have. I would say at least 80% of the time it’s active for me, at rank 1So play one Killer and have 2 perk slots to soften the blow from a single perk. You don't see how that might show a balance problem?
-
@only1biggs said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@Orion said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@TheXenoborg You must be bad at the game.@Beardedragon What do I complain about exactly?
@Doom_Punk You're so stupid
Survivor main? More selective reading nonsense. I main killer you pleb. Jesus, don't you get tired of being wrong all the time? Moreover, unless the killer is a potato, it's not possible to get into position. If you think otherwise, you've played against awful killers with no brain. Maybe it's easy for rank 20's like yourself, but oh well.I do think otherwise, cause you're a console peasant. Flashlight saves would be a tiny bit harder to do on a controller.
It works for me when they're not looking at a wall cause I know the timing, and not all Survivors go down next to walls.
Oh my god what a moron!! Console peasant!? LOLOLOLOL Oh no, my feels, plez don't, no more :'D
Putting aside the fact that we have multiple rigs, laptops and consoles...i'm telling you, only dumb killers, or those not paying attention, or those who have just picked up the game, will be able to have someone flashlight save against them. I've made them too you dummy, my point is, it's only against idiots. But, you just use your selective reading skills to pick out whatever else you like here, while I continue to laugh at your "console peasant" line
Oh, I also have hours in console and PC :P
*circle of life music intensifies
And the funny thing is, you don't own the game on Steam on your account.
Unless of course you happen to bullshit your way through that one, I saw some posts you made on the Steam forums on your account and it shows you don't own the game, cause otherwise there'd be a mouse icon. Unless you prove it, then nice try buddy. And your profile is private either way
Thanks for some more ad hominem because you're terrible at flashlight saves and don't want to admit it. That's the stench of true failure right there. Only good Survivors will be able to pull them off now, oh, what's that, you thought you were good? Better start getting good then and less complaints that they're impossible like you and so many other Survivor mains.
LOLOLOLOL You are so, so stupid. So, so, so stupid. Just, next level.
I've made flashlight saves since the change too....against pleb killers.
Based on everything you have posted here (and probably other places), you're trash. Both as survivor and killer.
Anyway, continue being moronic. It's always amusing to hold you up like the idiot Simba you are :'D
More ad hom.
Been doing saves even on good Killers cause I know the timing and only if they're not near a wall, which most of the time Survivors intentionally go down away from walls.
As you're saying (while being a console peasant) that flash saves are impossible. Sounds like a very bad player to me. I have more hours than you do bud.
Stay salty for me man, keep going insulting me cause you have nothing better to add. There's plenty of trolls around anyways.
Obviously if you get flashlight saves they were bad Killers, because only bad Killers get blinded by flashlights. Circular logic at its finest.
^
Yeah those Killers sure were just bad, even having thousands of hours and chasing Survivors well. That type of logic comes from Survivor mains who pretend they main Killer.
All the while this guy is playing on a controller, LOL. What a complete joke. I seriously wonder what Killers he plays on console that he acts like he can kill any SWF team in the world, even Marth's team. Typical troll.
:'D
You two deserve each other. Carry on with your selective reading.
*edit - Oh, _and_ putting words in my mouth. Just amazing
Dude, every time someone points out a Killer who got blinded, you immediately claim they were bad. You said that flashlight saves only work against bad Killers. Excuse me if I'm using your own words against you.
-
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@Doom_Punk said:
@only1biggs said:
@TheXenoborg You must be bad at the game.@Beardedragon What do I complain about exactly?
@Doom_Punk You're so stupid
Survivor main? More selective reading nonsense. I main killer you pleb. Jesus, don't you get tired of being wrong all the time? Moreover, unless the killer is a potato, it's not possible to get into position. If you think otherwise, you've played against awful killers with no brain. Maybe it's easy for rank 20's like yourself, but oh well.I do think otherwise, cause you're a console peasant. Flashlight saves would be a tiny bit harder to do on a controller.
It works for me when they're not looking at a wall cause I know the timing, and not all Survivors go down next to walls.
Oh my god what a moron!! Console peasant!? LOLOLOLOL Oh no, my feels, plez don't, no more :'D
Putting aside the fact that we have multiple rigs, laptops and consoles...i'm telling you, only dumb killers, or those not paying attention, or those who have just picked up the game, will be able to have someone flashlight save against them. I've made them too you dummy, my point is, it's only against idiots. But, you just use your selective reading skills to pick out whatever else you like here, while I continue to laugh at your "console peasant" line
Oh, I also have hours in console and PC :P
*circle of life music intensifies
And the funny thing is, you don't own the game on Steam on your account.
Unless of course you happen to bullshit your way through that one, I saw some posts you made on the Steam forums on your account and it shows you don't own the game, cause otherwise there'd be a mouse icon. Unless you prove it, then nice try buddy. And your profile is private either way
Thanks for some more ad hominem because you're terrible at flashlight saves and don't want to admit it. That's the stench of true failure right there. Only good Survivors will be able to pull them off now, oh, what's that, you thought you were good? Better start getting good then and less complaints that they're impossible like you and so many other Survivor mains.
LOLOLOLOL You are so, so stupid. So, so, so stupid. Just, next level.
I've made flashlight saves since the change too....against pleb killers.
Based on everything you have posted here (and probably other places), you're trash. Both as survivor and killer.
Anyway, continue being moronic. It's always amusing to hold you up like the idiot Simba you are :'D
More ad hom.
Been doing saves even on good Killers cause I know the timing and only if they're not near a wall, which most of the time Survivors intentionally go down away from walls.
As you're saying (while being a console peasant) that flash saves are impossible. Sounds like a very bad player to me. I have more hours than you do bud.
Stay salty for me man, keep going insulting me cause you have nothing better to add. There's plenty of trolls around anyways.
Obviously if you get flashlight saves they were bad Killers, because only bad Killers get blinded by flashlights. Circular logic at its finest.
-
@rafiksom said:
@Orion
I am using pig with massive wasting time build and its doing very well.
Dont use ambush, just stand up when you hear someone doing gen and catch this filthy survivor.
Perks: thanathophobia, ruin, barbeque + bloody butcher. Put reverse traps as fast as you can. They spend a lot of time doing everything but not gens. Its good because when the game is very long you can have 32k points (2x with barbeque).Keep in mind my Pig is very low level. I don't have those perks.
