Avatar

Jack11803

Jack11803

About

Username
Jack11803
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
—

Comments

  • Just another idea SWF will barely get hurt by, while solo will get completely thrashed. The last thing we need is to increase the power gap. The power gap between solo and SWF is the ENTIRE reason the game isn’t balanced, as nerfing SWF would weaken solo. Solo has a survival rate of 30% that’s 20% TOO LOW

  • @Blueberry said:
    Map design is the biggest issue. However, we’ve been telling them that for the last two years. It’s too large of a fix for them to undertake at this point as they kept adding more maps and increasing how many they would have to work on. In an ideal scenario, pallets need to be reduced dramatically, like cut in half. In that same token though, survivors have no other way to get away. They need to at the same time add a ton more bushes/debri/fog they you can juke mid chase with. Think swamp maps but even heavier chances to lose sight. This would shift more of the gameplay into skilled jukes rather than running circles around a pallet all game with no skill involved. 

    Exactly this. And maybe nerf anti stealth perks, just a bit though. Like BBQ from 4 seconds to 3 level of little

  • @Blueberry said:
    I think it’s a good change. It’s more punishing if you sprint around to objectives instead of saving it by walking. Yes it effects the other perks, but it effects SB more so. 

    Less so. Sprint burst activated at start of chase. Others activate mid chase. ANY exhaustion debuff killer has ruins every perk BUT SPRINT BURST. That’s completely stupid. I’m pretty sure the devs forgot those add ons existed when they made this change

  • @TheOwl said:
    I'm no doubt coming into this thread with an unpopular opinion, but I'm sure that the developers have their reasons for this change, and I think that it is reasonable. They would have just nerfed Sprint Burst itself unless they felt like the current exhaustion mechanic was the issue, which they clearly do.

    In my opinion, the reason that nobody currently complains about the other exhaustion perks going off more than once during a chase is that they are not used as much as Sprint Burst, so the issue rarely occurs with those perks. Yes, Sprint Burst is undeniably the strongest of the exhaustion perks as it has no activation requirement compared to Balanced Landing, Lithe and Dead Hard. However, those perks, (especially Lithe), still have the capabilities of being just as powerful, and going off multiple times in one chase. Only changing Sprint Burst would simply cause more players to run the other sprint perks in its place and suddenly those perks would be an issue that would have to be fixed by the developers down the line. By changing exhaustion now, they avoid this issue.

    Except that’s debunked by killers saying they’ve faced this perks and didn’t think it was a problem. Only sprint burst has the free ability to escape if you got caught with your pants down. That’s why it’s hated.

  • @XxPennywisexX said:
    I had read somewhere when buying Chapter Curtain Call bundle you get an exclusive cosmetic. Not sure if I’m missing it but could someone tell me what it is?

    White pallet swap for kate. Next time make this a question thread, so I can get an answer badge; I’m a greedy #########

  • @White_Owl said:

    @Grey87 said:

    @Tsulan said:
    Survivors are not playing the PTB because they think it doesn´t contain anything good for them. So why bother.
    They forget, that the PTB is to find out if the new changes are balanced or if they need changing.

    They are playing themselfes by not giving the devs any data.

    Not everyone wants to do the work for the devs and gain nothing from it.
    Personally I think it's a waste of time playing on the ptb. If you want to give them data then by all means go and play survivor on ptb.

    It's not doing the work for them, they already did theirs. This is an opportunity they give us to say if we like what they did and if not what needs to be changed. If people don't play the PTB and then cry because of nerfs or changes they don't like, they should just shut the [BAD WORD] up because they refused their chance to give actual feedback.

    Too bad the world isn’t like that. The devs will see constant threads about nerfing too hard, and see survivors refusal to play PTB, the ONLY picture this will paint is the nerfs are too much

  • @Grey87 said:
    Lol
    Who would care what about something some random person had said to them?
    Either grow a thicker skin or use that toggle button to hide the chat if it hurts your feeling so badly.
    Seriously , don't see why would anyone quit a game because of that, it's so childish.
    You're either a kid or a very sensitive woman if you quit a game because people talk s*** to you.

    Begone bigot

  • @MineAntoiya said:

    Wait, lemme check

    ...

    ...

    ......

    ...........

    How do i breathe?

    You dare space out you dirty ass hoe

  • @ACoolName said:
    nah not that dude. MUCH worse. Like, life ruining wore. That THING almost took everything i had.
    Plus ": all who are not virgins are thots. as such : BEGONE THOT! "

    But I don’t breathe

  • @MineAntoiya said:

    Mains Billy, but isn't virgin. Am I a...

    PARADOX?

    Do you breathe? Yes or no?

  • @ACoolName said:
    The thing is, Jack-boi, TTTTTchads gave me a traumatic experience. If any of y'all have seen my posts or comments, you'll know i'm the most pacifist apache helicopter here. However, HOWEVER! when it comes to TTTTCHads : They are objectively dumb and I HATE THEM.

    Mad cuz virgin

  • @ACoolName said:
    anybody whose name is chad i automatically despise. so imma say billy boi better cuz TTTTTTCHADS are dumb.

    Guess you don’t waddle then huh?

  • @MineAntoiya said:
    So I've been using We'll Make It consistently in my build throughout the x2 BP event. From what I've seen it has become the superior Borrowed Time that not a lot of Killers can stop in time (Even Nurses couldn't get to me in time).

    I'm making this post to ask one question - Is it Balanced or Broken? From experience, it seems to be an incredibly powerful save perk that makes any basic ######### Killer's day more hell than it already is. Especially if they go against the idea of camping. I'll keep saying, that as long as it remains in its current state, every player should run it

    But is it fair for the Killer?

    When a Killer faces Borrowed Time they simply just have to keep chasing until the person falls, simple as. But when a Killer without 1-shot potential faces We'll Make It on an average survivor who knows how to loop, then they can be ran for a long time more.

    So, is it?
    And, for the killers, how do you feel when they come straight off the hook to be insta healed?
    Would you camp more if it became a meta perk?

    I think it’s problem is it punishes not camping. But that’s it. The actual effect itself isn’t too strong, MAYBE a bit too long though.

  • @C4Garuda said:
    ThePloopz said:

    insert pic of Feng Min in her bunny hoodie

    Lmao that would be awesome. Cant wait for bath robe Ace. As an Ace main im happy i was able to get the 2 things i wanted with iridescent shards. 

    I swear if the velvet purple one is the premium one, I’ll riot. The premium better be the gold one.

  • None, they’re ten freaking dollars. That’s ridiculous. This ain’t a free to play game.

  • @Tsulan said:

    @Jack11803 said:

    @Tsulan said:

    @SasukeKun said:

    @jiyeonlee said:

    @Jack11803 said:

    @Tsulan said:
    Jack11803 said:

    @Tsulan said:

    So... would you prefer to get Insidious basement camped by Leatherface?

    If it’s a leatherface with insidious and you’re in the basement, BBQ won’t even come close to stopping that camp

    Then he's wasting a perk slot.

    Too bad that’s common. BBQ does very little to motivate not camping, except by people who would normally not camp anyway.

    yep, you have some point
    actually its better at camping, cause let me know i have to camp or not

    Yes that's what people should understand, it's meant to take away campers but it actually just let's them know if they should camp or not while giving them even more bloodpoints

    So you would prefer that the devs remove BBQ.
    What is you opinion on Insidious? Because once the devs remove BBQ, you´ll find way more Insidious users.

    It’s weird how you’re using camping as a shield. Does that mean you think its a bad thing? I just want muh stealth

    Not using it as a shield. He thinks BBQ should be removed, because it gives campers more points. Ignoring that it heavily reduced camping.

    Oh, in that case yeah I agree. I just want that one second chipped off, it’d make the difference of the world. Removing its #########. Just buff WGLF if it having 2 effects is funky. Seriously.... buff WGLF, getting stacks is like getting STD’s

  • @DocOctober said:

    @powerbats said:

    @BaconMuncher9 said:
    You could always use Sole Survivor. I like having aura reading perks on both the killer and the survivor.

    Yes but won't the new killer perks trump that similar to the Shape's ones that trump perks.

    Look the Perk up first.

    Eh, he is right. The aura reading perks that break stealth the most are new bitter murmur and BBQ. Nurses is avoidable, or helps ambush killers do exactly what they’re meant to do. The two big ones are unaffected by sole survivor most the time, speaking of which, why’d they nerf it? Sole survivor is even more trash than it used to be

  • @Tsulan said:

    @SasukeKun said:

    @jiyeonlee said:

    @Jack11803 said:

    @Tsulan said:
    Jack11803 said:

    @Tsulan said:

    So... would you prefer to get Insidious basement camped by Leatherface?

    If it’s a leatherface with insidious and you’re in the basement, BBQ won’t even come close to stopping that camp

    Then he's wasting a perk slot.

    Too bad that’s common. BBQ does very little to motivate not camping, except by people who would normally not camp anyway.

    yep, you have some point
    actually its better at camping, cause let me know i have to camp or not

    Yes that's what people should understand, it's meant to take away campers but it actually just let's them know if they should camp or not while giving them even more bloodpoints

    So you would prefer that the devs remove BBQ.
    What is you opinion on Insidious? Because once the devs remove BBQ, you´ll find way more Insidious users.

    It’s weird how you’re using camping as a shield. Does that mean you think its a bad thing? I just want muh stealth

  • Come to think of it... she might be dead.

  • @flamestandish said:

    @Jack11803 said:

    @flamestandish said:

    @Jack11803 said:
    Warren is a real person, and I doubt she would want to be in a video game....

    David Tapp is also a real person but he’s in the game.

    Uh, no he’s not...

    I’m not even sure if you are a real person.
    It’s a character idea, who cares if the person is a real life person or not. Give constructive response or please don’t respond at all. A name is just a name. If I had named the survivor ‘Donald Trump’ would you be complaining that my Trump shouldn’t be in the game because he shares the same name as a president?.

    I don’t mean shares a name, that lauraine warren, was a real ghost hunter, and I’m pretty sure she would restrict licensing with her mere existence. Valek could totally get added though. Not that they would, but it’d be physically possible at least

  • @flamestandish said:

    @Jack11803 said:
    Warren is a real person, and I doubt she would want to be in a video game....

    David Tapp is also a real person but he’s in the game.

    Uh, no he’s not...

  • @Tsulan said:
    Giddawid said:

    Enjoying the thought put into this, but Shrek isn't a villain. He's a lovely, misunderstood ogre. Let's get Lord Farquaad in there and have Shrek as a survivor ;)

    I'm trying to imagine how shrek would try to play stealthy...

    He’d just scare the killer way. “WHAT ARE YOU DOING, IN MY SWAMP!?”

  • I’m not gonna go into some philosophical “you go girl” crap. I’m gonna do what should of been done, give a simple answer. No.

  • It’s good, exactly what I thought should be done. Don’t know how to discuss it though, just a simple yes.

  • Warren is a real person, and I doubt she would want to be in a video game....

  • @wolflinkin said:
    Brilliant. Absolutely necessary. I have a friend that just started playing the game (he wants to be a killer) and the fact the he is playing rank 1 survivors that have de-ranked to rank 20 is disgusting. This is why it's hard to get new killer mains. They experience the toxic bullying the first game they play.

    Both sides get it, not just new killers.

  • @OXY said:

    @only1biggs said:

    @OXY said:

    @only1biggs said:

    @OXY said:
    Flashlight, DS and pallet looping the entire game. Such a great combination.

    I bet he complains when a killer camps him though.

    He didn't use his flashlight, he missed DS. What else is he supposed to do aside from looping? Give himself to the killer?

    Try and lose him by juking him? All he is doing is just running from pallet to pallet and not even making an effort to lose him but instead waste his time.

    Right and it worked...because the killer was bad and didn't go after someone else.

    It doesn't matter if it worked or not, it's making the game hell for the Killer. Losing him would've worked too. You're probably a survivor main and wouldn't understand anyways.

    I wouldn’t dive into fixing things because they’re unfun, even if viable strategy’s. That’s a slippery slope some killers are gonna slide down. You do that, and I’m sure very close camping would get axed because “it’s making the game hell for survivor”

  • @Master said:

    @only1biggs said:
    Don't keep chasing him. You should have realised this after 30 seconds. Just find someone else, and kill the guy you were chasing later when he's more vulnerable. Or, do something different than just following him blindly.

    If it is not possible to catch a single survivor, then there is sth wrong with the game

    I mean, if with blood lust 3 you couldn’t catch him, you were doing something wrong. Also, regarding not being able to catch a guy; you are meant to and strong enough to catch someone of equal skill.

    That’s why people hate campers, because you can’t “not get caught” as that’s not how the game works, you WILL get caught if the killer wants your caught and is good enough. That’s why they get chances that are supposed to actually come into effect. But camping stops this. Anyway, if they are BETTER than you, and read you, or make a good juke, then that’s just them being better than you. If you like you said, got ######### RNG, and he expensed basically every pallet on the map, yes THAT IS A PROBLEM

  • @Orion said:
    Survivors created the camping problem by feeding campers since the game started. That is a fact. If they hadn't, Killers wouldn't camp as much, even with the Emblem system. Take responsibility, if you're one of those.

    Killers created pallet looping by tunneling. Change my mind!

  • @MikeLatin7

    You seem to be misunderstanding. I’m saying survivors are wrongfully punished, very badly at that, for a killer closing app on os4. Do you think that’s in the tiniest bit fair? Shouldn’t all dc efforts the devs have be put into not having that happen? And it sends you to main menu, so you don’t know who the killer that did it was. It’s basically the killers version of the flashlight macro, but only on PS4, and does WAY MORE DAMAGE

  • Just another doc terror perk. And it’s bloodpoint boost is ass. Considering it’s only in game, and only pig doesn’t usually max deviousness

  • @MikeLatin7 said:

    @Jack11803 said:

    @MikeLatin7 said:
    no body needs to get banned. Survivors should lose their add-ons and the killer should get 100% as if they were on the hook. killers that disconnect should have a penalty of 5000 blood points and all the survivors + 5000 blood points I say that because the offerings are about that 5 to 6000 blood points and you lose them because the killer disconnected. That's fair.

    On PS4 survivors lose EVERYTHING they brought in, items included, pips, and even the previous games progress. THIS IS WHEN THE KILLER DC’s. What do you think of that?

    I don't know but my proposal seems fair on pc they don't lose anything

    That’s not a proposal I said. That’s what happens NOW, when killer dc’s. That’s right, it SEVERELY punished survivors instead

  • @MikeLatin7 said:
    no body needs to get banned. Survivors should lose their add-ons and the killer should get 100% as if they were on the hook. killers that disconnect should have a penalty of 5000 blood points and all the survivors + 5000 blood points I say that because the offerings are about that 5 to 6000 blood points and you lose them because the killer disconnected. That's fair.

    On PS4 survivors lose EVERYTHING they brought in, items included, pips, and even the previous games progress. THIS IS WHEN THE KILLER DC’s. What do you think of that?

  • @foxofthestars said:
    Daniel101773 said:


    Pandakecks said:

    You all are not seems to be really smart, or grown up enough to have a real talk. And how you all think im a just survivior main, like i said im playing both. I dont even enjoy Killer anymore since the last updates, with that one it will not anymore a challenge at all. Sry that it seems that all of you need that to actually win a game xD Sad story.

    “You all are not seems to be really smart” 
    just gonna end it there 

    Did you ever think that English may not be their first language? 

    I’m almost certain he speaks a language available on the forum if English isn’t his first. In that case, no excuse as he chose to go here

  • @JammyJewels said:
    Orion said:

    If you want Survivors to change, I suggest you help Killers to punish the toxic ones (bodyblock, rat them out, etc.), and explain why you did it in the post-game chat. The vast majority of Killers won't kill someone who helps them get rid of toxic #########. I know I won't.

    But then I would be considered toxic. I don't think this is a situation that is dealt like 'fight fire with fire'. After all those you body block could easily turn on you once they get the chance... Not to mention having to equip Bond to know which ones are trolling.

    That’s a beyond stupid idea. You don’t fight toxicity with CHEATING! That’s actually pathetic. What do you even consider toxic anyway?

  • @SnakeSound222

    Okay, I’d rather it was 3 seconds so it was basically same on slower killers, but not as strong on billy and nurse. But let’s forget that for a moment and be hypothetical. If they never introduced a killer BP perk or it was simply standalone, basically, off BBQ was released with just its aura reading, how do you think it would’ve been received? Honestly? I’m not saying it NEEDS a nerf, but that perk IS strong as hell.

  • @SnakeSound222 said:
    Tsulan said:

    @Jack11803 said:

     @Tsulan said:
    
       @Russ76 said:
    
      Just theowing it out there.  Never used BBQ and Chili so maybe I don't fully understand.  
    
        But would it break the perk to add 2 to 3 seconds of time to it, but the drawback is you only have a snapshot of where they were and doesn't show you continued movement.  (Thinking something closer to the survivor's scream when playing doctor).  
    
        Also I would love to see survivors getting BP, distraction if they were continually hit or being camped as that is what the hanging survivor is doing, being a distraction.
    
        What do you guys think?  I don't think it will ever be implemented.  (I said in another thread that I don't think any devs, other than NotQueen, even come to the forums to see these ideas)
    
     
    
    
    
      BBQ has been shadownerfed. The aura is almost the same as the gen aura. Which makes it really hard to see survivors. I´m not sure why the devs would do that. Since it defeats the purpose of the BBQ aura reading: giving the killer a new target.
    
      Maybe if people stop using BBQ and start to camp more. 
    

    Then survivors might appreciate BBQ.

    Shadiw nerf my ass. They declared exactly why they did that, it was in patch notes, and was openly discussed on stream. Nerf, yes. It means killers are no longer lying when they say “hide behind a gen” but it wasn’t a SHADOWnerf

    Then why are you guys still complain about BBQ if it already has been openly nerfed?

    Because it makes surviving harder and still messes with their precious stealth. Remember, it needs to be braindead easy for a Survivor to escape. 

    Exactly! They should bring infinite’s back too. Camping is killing this game

  • I feel the same until I get face camped. Then it’s ON!

  • Hell to the no no; to the no no, nooo.

  • @Shipthebread said:

    @MinusTheBillie said:
    Shipthebread said:

    @Brady said:

    Another delay.......................................................................................................................................................

    The second you still went out and bought the DLC and can't wait to dump cash into Auric cells you gave up any credible right to complain in my eyes. You don't like how it's been handled and how you have been treated? Hit them where it hurts, in their wallet not by complaining like the rest of the hive mind only to break down and still give them your money.

    People are on this forum because they love this game. They complain because they love this game. Doing ######### like that out of spite is stupid and sad. 

    It's out of principal, I have been playing the game since release and time and time again console in general is getting the shaft, I bought every DLC and I am going to sit this one out since it seems that they really don't have any plans to make a number of needed improvements to both Xbox and PS4. Clearly our numerous threads on forums and inquiries on Dev streams have not had any effect. So I will save my money and hope that maybe a little bump in the pocketbook gets console some more love.

    I don’t know, on reddit, although only set up for a tiny bit, they made a sticky asking to stop insulting them, as it was GREATLY hurting staff morale.

  • You guts are merely stroking you’re own ego thinking your the better person by not bragging. It’s rarely that. Some people actually think about what they want to wear.

  • A killer threatened to ######### and snap my mothers neck. No biggie

  • @SovererignKing

    I don’t care about a single thing said unless you think it can supersede the devs, but in that case camping would be thrown into the crosshairs of questionable ideas, and killers would hate that I’m sure.

  • @TheTimeMachine said:
         I don’t think it is good to give this particular information to a Killer once they pick up a Survivor with this perk. 
         As a Killer it only makes me want to check around a corner for any hidden hooks. (Usually there are).

    Yeah, it annoys me when the killer learns I picked a useless perk and handicapped myself!

  • I never understand “mains” just play both, guarantee you have over an 100% higher chance of growing a conscious.

  • @SovererignKing said:
    darktrix said:

    People need to stop assuming every survivor they see is part of some elite swf team with comms, we're not. I'd rather take that 1 in 4 chance of being camped while the others got gens done, than that 1 in 3 (or better) chance of getting targeted just because some rng potato I got stuck with in the trial is hooked. Likewise I don't want to penalize the strangers I play with if I happen to be that potato on the hook. Every trial I have to break any rhythm to counter bbq more so than any other perk in existence and that gets old.

    Stops camping? No, it justifies it if the killer doesn't see all auras they assume someone is close by and will camp/patrol even harder, or if they do see all auras. they get an idea if their hook is safe for awhile and about when they should wander back in time to greet the unhook. Basically what I hear when people say camping will happen more if bbq wasn't around, is that most killers are just bad at the job.

    tl;dr The big beef I have with bbq is it penalizes me for someone else's fail.

    You live as a team, you die as a team. You don’t get to sit there, praise and enjoy the benefits of having team mates, then ######### and moan when having team mates hinders you. 

    Survivors are just people with a common goal, NOT A TEAM. -devs around same time they said camping is ok

  • @Duckodb12 said:
    I just saw a Kate in a match with the white shirt on that's supposed to be only available if it's bought as a bundle from the store. I saw a clown a about an hour ago too. Maybe the clown was bought with shards but I wonder how that person had a Kate with the white shirt already.

    You know Europe isn’t in North America?

  • @Tsulan said:

    @Russ76 said:
    Just theowing it out there.  Never used BBQ and Chili so maybe I don't fully understand.  

    But would it break the perk to add 2 to 3 seconds of time to it, but the drawback is you only have a snapshot of where they were and doesn't show you continued movement.  (Thinking something closer to the survivor's scream when playing doctor).  

    Also I would love to see survivors getting BP, distraction if they were continually hit or being camped as that is what the hanging survivor is doing, being a distraction.

    What do you guys think?  I don't think it will ever be implemented.  (I said in another thread that I don't think any devs, other than NotQueen, even come to the forums to see these ideas)

    BBQ has been shadownerfed. The aura is almost the same as the gen aura. Which makes it really hard to see survivors. I´m not sure why the devs would do that. Since it defeats the purpose of the BBQ aura reading: giving the killer a new target.

    Maybe if people stop using BBQ and start to camp more.
    Then survivors might appreciate BBQ.

    Shadiw nerf my ass. They declared exactly why they did that, it was in patch notes, and was openly discussed on stream. Nerf, yes. It means killers are no longer lying when they say “hide behind a gen” but it wasn’t a SHADOWnerf

  • @det0xxp said:
    Jack11803 said:

    @det0xxp said:

    Caver12 said:

    Cannot purchase. Remember when huntress didn’t work after you purchased it whenit first released?
    

    Maybe it's being implemented as we speak. Did the huntress have this same error code and how long till after it did pop up did it finally work?

    Huntress had this issue, took a WEEK to fix it. The fact that it’s another delay... AND ONE THEY HAVE EXPERIENCED AND SHOULD'VE PREPARED FOR irks me to no end!

    If I'm not mistaken Huntress had another issue. You can purchase it. But it just wasn't showing up in game that you owned it. Pretty sure they had to push out a patch for it.

    That was after. Double dealing

1 … 28 29 30 31 32 … 69