GoodBoyKaru
GoodBoyKaru
About
- Username
- GoodBoyKaru
- Joined
- Visits
- 18,126
- Last Active
Comments
-
@SharkPiledriver said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1810787#Comment_1810787
We're blaming the younger generation for being wimps because they're acting like wimps. Theres a huge, HUGE catalog of video games in existence, you don't have to play the new garbage thats being released.
I can blame them, and I will blame them.
So because we want to enjoy games that looks good instead of low poly ######### it's our fault the gameplay is arse?
Okay boomer.
-
@DCash said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1810374#Comment_1810374
But it's your choice to use those products. No one is forcing you. There are always people trying to get your money in life. This is especially true for the young as they are gullible, because they don't take the time to analyze the situation. There is a grain of truth to what they said.
You're right, nobody is forcing us to use those products. Nobody is making me play the remake of resident evil 2 over the original. Nobody is making me play Overwatch or Paladins or whatever. Nobody is making me play New Super Mario Bros Deluxe Switch Edition, over the original one, except for me.
My point was that you can't blame it on the younger generation for being wimps when we're not the ones designing the games we play.
-
@OllieHellhunter said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1810639#Comment_1810639
My point still stands that you do not need to settle with what is presented currently, you can seek out lesser known products or well known products from the past.
What do you mean to achieve by just stating Different genres and Different markets, yes theres a wide array of genres but the markets tend to overlap, for example I mainly enjoy strategy game and games which involve predicting an opponent and rather dislike games such as most FPSs and Racing games which tend to focus more on the action rather than planning and preparation.
Show me where I tried to make anything an age thing, you claimed it was not a younger generation causing it because they were too young at the time, but it still is a younger generation just not the one you're being quite defensive about, that I suspect we both belong to.
also on a sidenote what is SDV, never heard of it and when I looked it up all that came up was about Swimmer Delivery Vehicles.
Oh sdv being stardew Valley
I'm not talking about you with the age thing comment but the original 2 I replied to.
-
@OllieHellhunter said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1810374#Comment_1810374
It still is a younger generation than those who made those older games, also you do not need to look at products and features presented to you, you can look for things yourself.
The products and features presented to us being those games. Games like Overwatch, Resident Evil 2 Remake, Cup head, etc, are those products with those features. Rese2 remake and Cup head are known as some of the best games (from what I've heard) for good reason, and people enjoy them. On the flip side more simple games like SDV is a classic even though it tells you what to do and when.
Different genres, different markets. Gaming is a lot more popular now than ever before so of course people want different difficulties for their games. My mum hates hard games but I love em, and naturally she's a lot older than I am lmao. On the flip side my sister loves easier ones and she's younger than me.
It's not an age thing. Don't try and make it one.
-
@chieften333 said:
I hate it in red ranks :)
Good enough to stay in them, but not good enough to have fun games in them
Don't call me out like that
-
@BioX said:
what happened to gamers man? is this just some new new new generation?
Where are my fellow 90s gamers who would spend days, weeks, on the same level in megaman or something jeez.
@SharkPiledriver said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1808224#Comment_1808224
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1808279#Comment_1808279
Thank God I'm not the only one like this. I was starting to think I was losing my mind. Do either of you remember the big deal people were making because Cuphead was "too hard"? People were saying content shouldn't be locked behind difficulty and other nonsensical things like that. I was so bewildered because I found games like Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels to be fun and engaging, that was a normal gaming experience for me.
Gibblywibblywoo is completely on the money. The rise of MOBAs for instance is directly because of this. All of the modern MOBAs have (at least tried to) fix their games so that one person on a team can only have so much influence. Even in something like Overwatch, theres no kill counter.
The younger generations have made gaming communities wack.
Idk why people are blaming my generation for being used the products we consume. We're not the ones who create those products because, funnily enough, we are/were too young to do so when they were made. It's not the "younger generation" ruining things, it's that we're getting used to the products and features presented to us. Stop trying to make it an age thing.
-
@SaltyNooty said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/212611/counters-to-ph
Mind game the mind gamer. You CAN loop him, it's simple to do. You'd be better off prematurely dropping the pallet and using that to run him in circles. Trying to go for stun or last minute drops will lead to a swift m2 into a down. Bait the PH into thinking you're going to turn some way and make him miss his shot, not that hard to do.
I'd love for you to face my PH and continue saying that you can easily loop a PH.
@topic Honestly stealth is your best best, followed by holding W. Also if there's a change in verticality, like on Dead Dawg Saloon (easily his worst map) or Hawkins' catwalks, abuse the ######### out of it. He can't hit *upwards* with his power, only down slopes. Run up or through buildings with lots of holes in the floor (again see the Saloon or Hawkins) and he's powerless, literally. It's a detriment to even try.
-
@Negi said:
I like the Legion outfit. I'm more concerned with how they expect most people to get tier 70. It's way too grindy.
I got to tier 70 within like 30 days ._.
-
@druggedpug69 said:
Hay is for horses.
Don't be discriminatory if I want to eat some hay I will eat the ######### hay.
-
//
-
Oops :/
-
@Hopesfall said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1805838#Comment_1805838
i would expect if mori's could be tuned out in a hotfix just out of the blue, keys could be removed from chests just as easily. Chests are basically a loot table no? that would be an easy temp fix until the "more complex" change is done
That doesn't fix the issues of keys though, just makes them more rare. They're going to do a full rework, maybe add-on pass, of keys, according to @MandyTalk, which naturally takes longer than a numerical change.
-
@FellowKillerMain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803568#Comment_1803568
Your argument is that Spirit is still viable and not being ran into the ground? If so, I agree.
My argument is indeed that Spirit has yet to be nerfed into the ground yeah
-
@supersonic853 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803846#Comment_1803846
I Mean pop before ds with the logic they presented. OoO apparently being fine. And now moris before keys. And i kinda agree if undying a ######### hex gets nerfed before ds then yeah i mean... i respect the devs but the track record is questionable. And this is from someone who already 2 hook moris with ebony so i dont depip lol and i dont wanna tunnel mori.
//
-
My reaction?
-
I cannot wait for shitshow these forums will become in a couple of minutes with everyone claiming survivor sided devs.
Come, enjoy some popcorn with me
-
@Hoodied said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803472#Comment_1803472
Really? I swear it was 21 not 20
I'm pretty sure all killers should have an add-on split of 2-4-5-5-4, which Demo does have. The only killer who doesn't is Huntress with, I believe, 1-3-5-7-4 (both going ur-com)
-
@cone_cranium said:
@jotaro - Any balance changes for Freddy in the future?
"Yes, indeed."
All you Freddy haters rejoice, for there is an update for Freddy currently in the works. No specific details can be dropped yet but yes, he's being worked on. Him chilling at the top of the stats board has genuinely got their attention. Stay tuned.
Jesus Christ, they literally want to run every semi-viable killer into the ground
Which is exactly why Spirit has remained untouched for a year yes.
-
@Pulsar said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803102#Comment_1803102
Pretty sure it was just bad wording on the OP's part.
However, I believe OP is referring to a situation that could arise. An LGBT character instead of a character who is LGBT. One is a character who solely exists to appease part of the community, the other is a character that exists in the same manner that all the other characters do, they just happen to be LGBT.
I'm not sure how likely the former option is, but I could see it happening.
And that's why the devs have held off of just shoving in that one of their existing characters is gay. So many gay people love David (from my experience anyway) and so just go "btw guys David is gay have fun", but they want to actually do it properly and do it justice, like they have with Zarina and Elodie and Claudette; the fact they're non-white isn't an integral part of their lore (I mean, it is for Zarina but it's not all she's about) and yet people adore Elodie because of how she looks; it's good representation. That's what they're wanting to do for an LGBT+ character (in their own words, anyway, we'll have to see how it pans out) and honestly go BHVR for that.
If you don't care about LGBT representation you shouldn't have any issues with having them in the game. Let the people who do care be happy and you can be indifferent all you like; just another survivor to kill (or escape as). If you do, you're part of the problem.
(This final statement was not directed at you, Pulsar but people in general, just in case you thought I was coming at you.)
-
@dezzmont said:
Firstly, its important to note that while this seems like a reasonable argument, trying to say 'we shouldn't have bad representation' what it actually does is create an artificially inflated standard on LGBTQ+ characters.
Specifically, a LGBTQ+ character should be able to fill every role a straight, cis character does, and implying that you need to meet certain qualifications to be a 'good' LGBTQ+ character itself is part of the problem: Your trying to force people to justify the existence of queer characters. So lets drop pretense.
You wouldn't bat an eye if a male character mentioned that they had a wife in a story. But if that same male character said they had a husband, you would apply different expectations to the inclusion of that character in attempt to declare that they are 'pandering' or 'forced in' or whatever. Even if they are exclusively there to be a male straight character in a relationship. Like "The Hillbilly's Mom and Dad" are explicit characters in DBD, who SOLELY exist to be a heterosexual couple who abused their child, but no one is saying they are arbitrarily forcing romance into the game. Likewise, Nea isn't Sweedish just to force 'a token Sweed,' despite the fact that Nea being Sweedish has NO impact on the game and is something you would never learn through pure gameplay because it exists entirely in the backstory, its because it would be weird if The Entity was capturing killers from all over the world and across time from all walks of life but mysteriously was only nabbing white American survivors.
In essence, your assuming straight and cis is 'default' or 'regular' or 'normal' (In fact, you pretty much said the quiet part out loud there) which is the entire problem: Because you view straight and cis as 'default' any deviation needs to be justified, that queer people are only allowed to exist 'for a reason' because otherwise you made someone 'not normal' for 'no reason.' When that reason can be as simple as 'queer people exist.'
Gay characters can be as one dimensional as straight characters, they can be as dynamic as straight characters. Their relationship can be all their character is about, just like many straight characters in stories, or it could just be one facet of who they are. All of those should be good and shouldn't result in any increased burden on the creators to justify it. Sometimes people are just gay, or bi, or trans, or nonbinary. Stories can be about the unique issues we face, because in many aspects of our lives our identities can be extremely important to our experiences, or those can be incidental because in many aspects of our lives that identity is incidental. So it isn't even that 'the character doesn't have to JUST be about their sexuality as a flat character' but 'Gay people should be able to be any type of character. Not every character in a story is a dimensional character, in fact most characters in a well written story are flat and non-dynamic, why can't some be gay?' And why can't some dynamic leads be incidentally gay in stories not about being gay?
As to why people specifically want an EXPLICITLY LGBTQ+ character?
Because 'assuming anyone could be gay' isn't equal representation. It is, again, a pretend way to say 'we already have it' when we clearly don't, because characters are confirmed straight all the time. Again, you just internalized it as 'default' so much you can't see how stuff like 'The nurse had a husband' is confirming her to be straight (or at least presents straight, I mean she is from somewhere around WW1/WW2, one could argue she had to marry a man to survive, but its implied her marriage was happy), meaning that its acceptable to reveal the sexuality of characters...
...As long as they are straight.
And yes, these reveals are advancing the story of these characters because your love life informs a lot about you, so they aren't JUST revealing that they are straight, but there is little reason you couldn't do the same for LGBTQ+ characters. It isn't that Nurse should be a Lesbian from the 1920s (It would be hard to make that not the case without seriously altering her background, and it would play into some truly horrific tropes to have the first gay character be a killer driven to madness by the tragedy of being gay), It isn't just that the new survivor had a boyfriend or whatever, maybe their boyfriend got kidnapped by the entity too. Or maybe they got lost on a mountain and they were part of a rescue party and got nabbed. Or any number of potential stories that include people who aren't straight.
If its a worry the character will be one dimensional, they could always make an existing character gay just as part of one of the background bits. Would Meg suddenly become a 'token character' if it was revealed she was into girls, despite all this interesting stuff we know about her like how she is both absurdly driven but at the same time gave up what she was driven about to take care of someone she cared about? Obviously not. So why worry a new character who is gay would 'just' be gay? That is a silly thing to assume and is pretty clearly trying to reduce a reasonable request to a ridiculous one by pretending that what people asked for ("a character who is LGBTQ+") is actually something different and unreasonable ("I want a character who's entire identity is their gay identity").
Also, to be clear, some people do live their life very openly queer and make it visible and a huge part of their identity. And most of those people are ######### awesome people because they chose to do that to make other people safer and to normalize being queer or not conforming to gender expectations that hurt real world people, as well as to create non-traditionally masculine/feminine role models for people who might not have them, or to visibly show them that queer people exist and they aren't alone and that being out is a thing you CAN be. The IRL queer equivalent of being willing to loop the killer to protect green rank baby queers trying to figure themselves out. So if your implying someone with dyed hair and a rainbow pin or whatever is 'making being gay their entire personality' you missed the point. Some LGBTQ+ people wanna be unassuming gen jockeys because it empowers their community, others wanna be loud and proud because it protects their community. Both are freaking rad and no human being has to earn your respect for who they are if who they are has absolutely no bearing on you.
TL;DR: Because straight characters are confirmed all the time and are never questioned for being straight regardless of how 3 dimensional or dynamic a character they are. Any type of character should be possible to confirm for being gay. It isn't just 'oh we don't say explicitly so it could be anyone' because its said explicitly a LOT about straightness.
@TheRockstarKnight said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803155#Comment_1803155
I wish I could Vote Up twice.
Forget twice dezz over here deserves ######### 30
-
Completely agree! I aspire to be as successful as the BHVR design team because they knock it out of the park every time without fail.
-
I love how @Orion put this: pandering is only an issue when it's to LGBT+ people. Pandering it horror fans by adding in liscened icons? Fine. Pandering to Silent Hill fans in particular with that entire chapter (which tbh was very good)? Fine. Pandering to the Poc community by giving them Zarina, Claudette, Elodie, etc? Fine.
Panding to the LGBT+ community by giving them some representation? Bad, bad, bhvr bad, never again, world is ending.
Also, "I'm not anti-lgbt" and then "Normal person/gay person" contradict each other. What's wrong with being gay, buddy?
-
@freddymybae said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802264#Comment_1802264
Since when are you a mod and know why I got messaged lol?
It's pretty obvious from this
@freddymybae said:
(This has nothing to do with that one mod messaging me :) )
:)
-
The game's about murdering people, why do you care if the people are LGBT or not? There's nothing wrong if they are and I welcome it with open arms.
The fact that you're complaining about people complaining is pretty ironic.
Also breaking a forum rule by saying why you were warned. Great idea!
-
@chieften333 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801497#Comment_1801497
There would still be teachables but to maximize the effectiveness of the survivor, you'd have to make a build around their innate perk. Instead of just the same meta we've had for years now.
And in order to build around those perks using the best perks certain survivors would beocme meta.
-
@chieften333 said:
I know this would be controversial, but what if survivors only had 3 perk slots, but the fourth would be an innate perk for that survivor.
Like claudette having botany knowledge innately, so she's a better healer. This would give survivors more unique aspects about them, and make them more than just skins.
Everyone then mains either Laurie or David (David for WGLF/DH, Laurie for DS/OOO) or never plays them again (if it's No Mither for David or Sole Survivor for Laurie).
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801388#Comment_1801388
Some killers are designed to be easier to play. That's not a drawback, it's just a characteristic. Not every killer needs to be as complicated as performing brain surgery while blindfolded.
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801397#Comment_1801397
You are correct.
Exvellent my memory isn't that bad
-
@Ihatelife said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801397#Comment_1801397
And bisexuality isn't a part of LGBT+?
Yes, it is. Which is why I responded to that, because your comment makes no sense with that context
-
@Ihatelife said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801382#Comment_1801382
But you know that your sexual orientation is your part of life right?
Correct me if I'm wrong but @Orion is bi lol
-
@Morfedel said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801204#Comment_1801204
Thats my entire point, which you seem to be missing. Sexuality has not really been a part of most of these characters backgrounds, one way or the other. 4 out of over 40 that was confirmed either way is nowhere near a large number. It just isn't an important part of the story.
The thing is, people (at least, I do, and some others) want equal representation. Thusfar we've got confirmation that those individuals were not gay (bi/pan possible ofc) and as a gay man I just want something. Obviously it doesn't have to 4 of them being gay for the 4 confirmed straight people but I just want something, hence why representation is a large topic for me, and why I am kinda glad they're waiting to do it well.
4/40 isn't large, it's only a 10th of the crowd, but 0/40 is even smaller.
-
@Morfedel said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801085#Comment_1801085
That is 4 characters out of over 40. That isn't exactly a telling number.
Out of all the characters yes. Remove the liscened ones from that, then feel free to tell me exactly how many of them have been confirmed to have had/be in non-hetero relationships.
-
@Morfedel said:
You know, I looked at the question regarding LGBTQ representation, and my thought was: how many of the characters do we even actually know, for a fact, what their sexuality is? I don't think most of them have any mention whatsoever.
I'd have to go back and read every single backstory, but the only ones I can remember offhand is some supposed romance between Wraith and Nurse. Now, not including licensed characters, that's it to my recollection.
Does anyone recall differently? I'm really not motivated to go read every backstory right now, but if that's the case, that would mean almost any non-licensed character could have any sexuality, and its all up to individual imagination.
I almost started to say that leaves out only trans, but then I remembered the old lady skin for the Cannibal, heh....
Sigh... and now I'm thinking of going to read those backstories anyway.... ugh.....
- Nurse had a husband (not Wraith)
- Felix has a girlfriend, with whom he was gonna have a kid
- David had an ex-girlfriend.
-
@TheButcher said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800682#Comment_1800682
Ohya, and it's just so funny how hypocrtical that is. When I have the proof. Nothing gets done.
It's easy for @MandyTalk to say for it to be reported. So that we report these people. Then when the support team gets it. Nothing is going to get done, but you know what. In a Dev stream @Peanits said "I assure you something get's done", and we should be content with that. Even though nothing gets done, and players have proof nothing gets done.
@GoodBoyKaru Next you're going to tell me that players finding bugs in the PTB is actually considered before releasing a chapter, because the community team, and dev's told you it is. Just like how so much was fixed for this chapter /s
But yeah you're right. I'm so wrong, simply because they TOLD you so - instead of actually showing real proof they are banning anyone at all. (inb4 they ban me for speaking up about it)
There was a thread a while ago and I wish I could find it where someone submitted a support ticket and, wanting proof people look at it, added in a message along the lines of "Someone respond to my forum post to prove these are read". Peanits then replied to the thread word for word with the message they were asked to repeat.
-
@horrortale_sans said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800539#Comment_1800539
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800558#Comment_1800558
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800623#Comment_1800623
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800669#Comment_1800669
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800678#Comment_1800678
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800691#Comment_1800691
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800694#Comment_1800694
ya this was a test on how toxic yall can be
Bruh I wasn't toxic why tf am I here?
-
@Angelicus23 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800673#Comment_1800673
because during years it has been and there are still some moments of fun, but the current state of the game has already proven to be worst than ever by sudden massive refund requests.
You can't just refuse to play anymore so easily and fast, since most of the players spent years grinding and incredible ammount of money on extra characters and skins, and this was a way of support along inviting new players when the game was playable.
Idk I spent over 3k hours in Paladins and spent a ######### ton of money on the game but when it just wasn't fun anymore I stopped playing. Haven't touched it in a year. It's pretty easy to just stop playing; I got my moneys worth and was satisfied with the memories. Same with dbd, I've gotten my moneys worth, but because I find the game fun still I keep playing it.
-
@MasterGrit said:
Did Eistein say no ?
Actually 2 stream ago (the one before the most recent one) he said that Myers' basekit wouldn't be getting changed in the foreseeable future however there's a likely chance of an add-on pass.
-
@TheButcher said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800228#Comment_1800228
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1800233#Comment_1800233
Lol that wouldn't even do anything. They don't care. Just wait this thread is gonna end up closed too, instead of the Mods actually deleting and messaging the people posting dismissive comments that add no additional information to the conversation.
They feel it better to hide and ignore the issue's Killers face, than to actually do anything about it.
A mod literally replied telling them it's bannable and how to report them but sure KEKW
-
@Angelicus23 said:
I hope this is sarcasm, but sometimes people from here really have this kind of weird opinion
If the game wasn't fun then why would people play it?
-
I can hope that they'll be introduced at a later date in winter for a short but so it's a lot more like a Christmas + new years special. Would've been nice ti have them from the start tho
-
I'm stealing this
-
@Ihatelife said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1797822#Comment_1797822
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1798134#Comment_1798134
Stream, update, missed content, DLC, their decisions on balance. I can't believe that Clown, Demo and Wraith are getting updates while Legion barely can do anything in the matches. Even the twins are better than Legion, because Victor can win at least loops and help Charlotte by blocking the path by him and vice versa.
There's more than one person on the balance team but seeing how everyone treats Almo here, who isn't the one singular person in charge of every decision to do with balance, I'm not surprised that only one person interacts with the forums and he does so relatively rarely.
-
@Elena said:
Woo! Good job c:
Ty :3
-
@TheClownIsKing said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1799587#Comment_1799587
Absolutely. That’ll count extra towards my free 10th visit loyalty card.
*heccin leg dab*
-
The... The map didn't change size... There's less of everything to work with...
What-
-
@TheClownIsKing said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1799582#Comment_1799582
I have my first therapy session this afternoon.
Bruh lemme tag along p l e a s e
-
@Yamaoka said:
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/465/425/3fd.jpg
Adept with bugged Twins be like:
It cost more than ######### everything I stg
-
@TheClownIsKing said:
Well done. I achieved the Adept yesterday.
Shocked me because I was reading the bugs made it impossible.
Less impossible, more they're bugged in like 98% of their games so you need to hope you fulfil the requirement in one of the games where they aren't bugged.
-
@BigBrainMegMain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1799543#Comment_1799543
He was using Twins.
He was getting their Adept, 3 perks, not camping and not tunneling either.
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1799547#Comment_1799547
Hmm.
Twins didn’t strike me as gay though. Definitely not the gayest. That person might have not known what they were talking about..
Actually this one was Pyramid Head. Poor Feng didn't know what hit her when I killed all of them before 2 gens were popped lol.
Bright pink Bunny Feng trying to hide in corn. It's a no from me.
-
Someone once came into my stream (yesterday btw) because they were salty that they died with 8k points. Called me gay and said I was using the "gayest killer". I'm like "Yeah, I am" at which point the homophobia spews forwards. "Burn the gays" was repeated several times before they were banned.
Then they made an alt. And another. And another. Banned each time ofc.
This is the first time it's gotten so... extreme but I wish I could say this was the first time it's happened lol. I ain't noticed a particular rise but that may be because I don't give people the chance to lmao.
-
I- disagree respectfully.