Giche
Giche
About
- Username
- Giche
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@chemical_reject said:
Take that negative ######### back to ur killer main circle jerk
Truth hurt i guess.
-
Devs are right after all.
They can ######### up and say whatever shits they want to their customers, they are all still there willing to throw money at them for overpriced skin.
And you wonder why peoples say the PLAYERBASE will kill this game in the long run.
-
Remake's Nancy neither.
-
@Caffeine said:
will_i_am_14_85 said:... Soooo in order to get an update you need to message them specifically? No public announcement? >_<
Correct, LOL.
We have four days until the end of the month and the masks have yet to be shipped or even processed.
im not sure their “promise” really holds any weight.It feels like their goal is to take as long as physically possible to deliver these masks so people are unable to chargeback their $80 USD purchase(s).
and now with them removing the item from the store, we have nothing but our initial receipt (that I decided to print) in case they pulled something like this, lmao.
I have done the same lul
So much trust in them...
-
@Vietfox said:
Giche said:There's a huge correlation between the two.
You don't want to argue nor listen to someone else, all you do is nitpicking in other's post and create strawman with nothing.
You act like this game is balanced and not plagued by toxicity, laughtable.
A free undeserved escape in this already unbalanced game isn't toxic ? And of course overused by toxic people ?
If you can't see this, nothing i can do for you.
One time use perk, can fail, and i failed it's permanently gone.
There are toxic people, but let's not pretend all of them are, shall we? Either 4ds squad survivors or killers who constantly hit you while being hooked till you are dead.
Take it easy and dont overreact just because you have to face those squads. Grow up.Huge time wasted for the killer by just pressing a skillcheck (who doesn't take skill at all) because the killer outplayed you by catching you.
And stop with this "Neutrality Bias", everyone who has played this game a bit perfectly know where the VAST majority of toxicity come from.
And not only by playing killer, even by playing survivor you will understand that your "teamate" are more often than not as much as an opponent then killer.
I wonder why...
Killers cannot mechanicaly do that much toxic things btw.
-
There's a huge correlation between the two.
You don't want to argue nor listen to someone else, all you do is nitpicking in other's post and create strawman with nothing.
You act like this game is balanced and not plagued by toxicity, laughtable.
A free undeserved escape in this already unbalanced game isn't toxic ? And of course overused by toxic people ?
If you can't see this, nothing i can do for you.
-
@Jack11803 said:
The pallet thing is a fix for the bugged hitboxes remaining active after a stun, getting absolutely insane hits.You can all try to describe it with different words, a lot of peoples aren't there for that long, no way they could tell the difference.
Gonna put it simple : They will re-add the pallet vaccum.
"B...but no !
They removed the vaccum, they are just gonna adjust the stun to happen sooner no worries
"The vaccum wasn't something appart, it was the visual result of placing the stun at the start of the animation, nothing else.
So vaccum will be back soon enought, saddly.
-
Don't imply that i make my opinion by other killers like i just got the game.
So you chose the strawman to get away with it, no prob'.
I'm used to see this for a long time now.
Cya, in another sterile argument.
-
-
I will stop you right here, i play this game since it's release.
Mainly playing killer, i've been throught ALL the bullshits this game and survivors had to offer.
Squads with 4 x instant DS, infinites, ... the list goes on.
So you impliying it's some sort of lobbyism by the killer's community just make me laught.
Whereas survivors usually do it in the most disgusting way (looking at you, Freddy...)
I'm know waiting for the usual :
"JuSt bReAk thE PalLEt "
"PaLetT ArE MindGaMes "
-
Decisive Strike is toxic by essence.
And peoples wonder why it's the ultimate perk in every toxic survivor's build.
If you don't see the problem with it, you're part of the problem.
And survivors telling killers to man up just make me laught.
Knowing this game's balance since release, saying that is basically trolling.
-
@AnthonyC2014 said:
I know it's probably because Laurie has Decisive, but if that's the case, then man up and hold your position as killer!What about taking your own advice ?
Man up and don't play with cancerous second chance perks.
Survivor gameplay is already easy enought as it is.
-
@ZombieGenesis said:
My question is, why shouldn't we expect that? Why can't all the killers be balanced to a point where any one of them can be just as effective as the others? Doing otherwise is just to cater to survivors, who are all universally equal to each other.Because there's 4 Survivors for one Killer, and sadly it happen that 90% of the survivor's community are toxic man-child/brats.
"Because they bring more money, we don't want to stress them you know..."
The reason why this game is doomed from the get go.
-
Haven't got one single Margaritas nor survivor's meat.
They finally removed pallet vaccum, just to re-implement it in another patch soon, due to review-bomb.
They can change the words to describe it, it will get back to how it worked before.
And you want peoples like me, who supported your game since release and got an insane amount of shits throwed at me as a killer, from survivor AND the Devs, to STILL play this underwhelming event ?
Just lol.
-
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Giche said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Giche said:
@SovererignKing said:
I’ve noticed on thing, with the fall of certain famous troll streamer, people are a lot less tolerant of this behavior. More people want this crap gone.Just logical.
Everyone know this since release.
Still took them more than 2 years to begin to actually FIGHT the toxicty.
Instead of bathing in it and making money on the situation.To be fair they do need the monies. Not saying i condone toxicity by the way.
They needed money.
They chose to do it the scummiest way possible, on the said toxic atmosphere.Nope, nothing to justify this in my book.
If no toxicity would have meant no community AKA no game, it would habe been totally DESERVED.
I think it was a necessary evil personally. I love this game and im happy for its growth.
Also like orion said the game was held by their publisher at the time so they might have had not a choice in the matter anyways .
Now its a significantly better game and the most toxic players are banned or similar.
One example is "that who shall not be named " currently in another platform of the game (not for long hopefully)
I can totally understand you on this.
More of a matters of personal value at this point, i can't stand this "marketing strategy"(lul).
-
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Giche said:
@SovererignKing said:
I’ve noticed on thing, with the fall of certain famous troll streamer, people are a lot less tolerant of this behavior. More people want this crap gone.Just logical.
Everyone know this since release.
Still took them more than 2 years to begin to actually FIGHT the toxicty.
Instead of bathing in it and making money on the situation.To be fair they do need the monies. Not saying i condone toxicity by the way.
They needed money.
They chose to do it the scummiest way possible, on the said toxic atmosphere.Nope, nothing to justify this in my book.
If no toxicity would have meant no community AKA no game, it would habe been totally DESERVED.
-
@SovererignKing said:
I’ve noticed on thing, with the fall of certain famous troll streamer, people are a lot less tolerant of this behavior. More people want this crap gone.Just logical.
Everyone know this since release.
Still took them more than 2 years to begin to actually FIGHT the toxicty.
Instead of bathing in it and making money on the situation. -
@Incarnate said:
>
It would be nice if it was actually possible to make them understand what their behaviour does to other human beings.Wut ?
They perfectly KNOW what they're doing and saying, and how peoples will react to it.
That's what they're looking for.
It's more of an educational problem with this generation.
Breed to be toxic lil' s***t to the others, because it's their right, and "muh Darwin huur duur"
-
@ChraizE said:
@AdánAR said:
Jajajajajaja stop being a pussy, you deserved it. I always have tryhard killers, campers, tunnelers, rage quitters, who complains about looping, who complains about sabo hooks... I teabbaged them and will always do it. Just getgud and stop cry about it. This is a surv side game i mean #########?This is exactly what is wrong with this toxic community! People like you need to stop existing in DBD.
This.
Way too much man-child.
-
This post from Reddit explain survivor mains 's attitude pretty well :
"What's the matter? Can't kill me by hooking me three times? Why did you have to go instantly for me when I got unhooked? Why didn't you go for the guy that was unhooking me? Why did you put me smack in the middle of three generators and push away anybody trying to either save me or do the generators? Why don't you hook me and go run to the other side of the map to chase somebody? What's the matter? Afraid of losing your hook? You're toxic for not letting anybody save me. What's the matter, is that the only way you can win? Can't you play the game the right way? Streamer plays killer where you hook a survivor and then leave. It's unfun if I don't get a chance to get off the hook!"
/facedesk"
See no problem with this mindset ?
You're part of the problem, and i can only encourage you to go play Civ 6.
-
@CallMeRusty420 said:
I bet the new killer will be looped by pallets.As usual.
-
The good old "Teacher killer
" meme.Peoples speculate about him since 2016, and for nearly ALL killer's release.
Can't believe that those false icons in the In-game files could troll nearly all generations of DBD players since release.
Also this idea stinks.
Teacher killer ? Bwhahaha nothing scary nor interresting about that, i personally don't understand.
We already got a pedophile with Freddy, it's pointless
-
@powerbats said:
@ZombieGenesis said:
Killers are used to getting shafted. That's just the straight up truth. Survivors go on about "whiny killers" but what happened when Survivors got a minor nerf to their kit? Massive negative review bombs. And you know what? It worked. They get their way. If you play killer you just have to learn to live with the fact that this is a survivor's game and you're just here for their amusement.I already addressed the review bomb in another thread and quite of few of those negative reviews weren't from survivors either. Some were from both sides and were complaints like the following.
So here's some stats from Steams store page.
Total reviews as of this writing: 144,753 ** (This was from an earlier post)**
Total positive reviews: 109,223
Total negative reviews: 35,530
To break that down the reveiw bombing total when it started was
July 25th when it started: 448
July 26th: 217
After that it started going back to normal reviews.
To further break it down a lot of bad reviews were for people complaining about the overall patch changes.
The overall exhaustion nerfs when they agreed with SB nerfs.
The players unable to join due to server issues.
There were several complaints about not having dedicated servers.
There were complaints from killers that the nerfs didn't go far enough. (amazing how it was review bombed by both sides but you all complain it was survivors only.)
There's complaints from both sides about the community being toxic.
There's complaints about the report system from both sides.
There's complaints about hackers from both sides.
Now if you look at the reviews from both sides some of them bashing the game have 0.2 hours of playtime while others have lots.
So there's a 3-1 ratio of good reviews to bad reviews and if you take out the bad reviews because the game doesn't have dedicated servers. The report system isn't working right now, the hackers etc, well then actual bad reviews like the review bombing become a lot rarer.When the majority of them was basically " I'm gunna quit !!! Killer OP !!! Baby killeryno can't stand my mad jukes :ppp, they have to whine ,mean, MEAN !!! >:( "
Can't respect, nor listen to these underadged #########, sorry.
And if these kind of "people" would leave the game, it would be a good riddance.
A restreint and elitist bracket of players are way healthier for the game than a vast majority of toxic brats, just sayin'.
-
@SovererignKing said:
However, like usual, the developers are kissing the Survivor’s asses so they stop review bombing the game first. Then Killers will get the changes needed... Soon(TM).
More like "Never(TM)"
It's been more than 2 years, they're making money on this situation.
Devs can only laugh at peoples like us who stayed and endured this bullshits that long.
The benefits of owning an addictive game.
-
Never happened when this map was released.
Then they "fixed" totem placement on it some patch later, due to the outcry.
As usual.
-
@powerbats said:
I always laugh when I see this comment because as a Claudette main (formerly, now mastering Bill) I've got no issues finding her generally. Those that can't find her need to play her and master her and then she won't be a problem. I have more trouble find P3 Quentins and Feng's and legacy Meg's than i do Claudettes.
Yes P3 Claudette is a pain to find but compared to others she's not and if you know where to look you'll find her usually. Try looking for a P3 Quentin on a dark map and you'll be lucky to find him.
No, it's not.
Killer since release, i can say without fear that Claudette has the best camo outfit in the entire game.
Game graphic make her black skin coupled to P3 outfits nearly invisible in most maps (MacMilan's one especially).
Devs even gave her a totally black outfit in their store.
Never wondered why Claudette became the "toxic survivor" cliche ?
No, it's not only because of Self-care...
Of course there are few exceptions where some characters have better camo than her, but only on specific map, with a specific survivor.
-
@Tzeentchling9 said:
You underestimate the crybaby Survivors, OP. Once Bloodlust is nerfed, they will double down on the screams for a Nurse nerf until they get that too.^^^^^^^^
This game's history testify it. -
@Twix said:
@snozer said:
@Twix said:
@Might_Oakk said:
So it seems like all those hits you land as you eat a pallet stun will just be a stun now with no hit.Seems alot worse then BL changes to me.
So you're saying you should be getting a free hit even though the pallet is clearly stunning you? lol
Get out of here with that bs.LiKe MAn EYe HaV WaLkeD 20 STEEps AnNDD BEN hit ARFteR I DRoped teH pellet!@#@!#
if you join a lobby with red ping then uninstall please.
survivors that wait at a pallet fully deserve to be hit for their greed. drop it early or f off to another game if you can't figure out the timing. It was never a "free hit", it was you being slow in the head.
Now it will be back to a free easy stun with no though or effort needed.
It was a free hit. The pallet stunned first and then the hit connected. F R E E H I T.
P.S. It doesn't matter if it's a lobby with a red, yellow, or green ping. The pallet would stun first and then the hit would connect, once again - F R E E H I T.
Why survivors deserve more a F R E E STUN than Killer a free hit ?
"B...but he can hit peoples with his weapon, mean, MEAN >:'o "
Survivor's mind, if they were honnest.
-
And i see no problem with that, it's a strat.
One that often pay, if played at the right moment.
-
@Orion said:
Maybe you're confused, this is a thread about connection problems when trying to start the game.Keep acting like these Devs never ######### up something in the 2 years of this game's lifespan.
Amazing that there is still peoples willing to defend them.
-
@Orion said:
Because an issue doesn't get solved in 12 hours or any other arbitrary timeline you draw up. It'll be fixed when it's fixed.Like it's been 2 years that peoles are waiting for balance ? lul
-
@Runiver said:
You say that cuz you got spammed by 2 people at every post in a thread, that is! kek!Yeah, one of the numerous way to abuse it, like on the Reddit survivor's circlejerk.
You don't see a problem with it ?