AlexAnarchy
AlexAnarchy
About
- Username
- AlexAnarchy
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@Orion said:
@AlexAnarchy said:
@Mister_xD said:
@Tydie said:
I'm so glad someone said something, I've been concerned about this for a while as well. As an African American myself I found it to be very insulting. This is especially true when you see almost every Cannibal wearing that specific cosmetic.. it kinda hurts deep down because you know they're doing it as a joke and its a running gag in the community.oooor its because thats the only mask they have unlocked yet, as its fairly easy to get due to the fact that almost every 2nd player plays as claudette.
but yeah. just look at it like everyone is racist and wants to insult you, without even knowing you. i bet that is a great way to look at life ^^It's just a simple case of who is truly the racist ones here, reality is, the only ones here who are racist are the ones pointing the finger about how it's racist and then calling people ignorant for not agreeing, point is, none of them would have even noticed if they themself were not racist enough to get the idea in there head then fire out at everyone about it.
Much like in real life, the only true racist ones are the ones calling everyone racist.
Which in turn is not ever gonna stop racism, it only makes people more angry to be called racist when they are not and makes the situation worse.Pretty sure at least some of the people being called racist are actually racist.
probably not hardly as many as those who are being pointed at. i'm not but i do get called one alot at my job cuz I said No.
This thread is just simple to prove the point that the most obvious racist are the ones calling other people racist in most cases.
-
@Mister_xD said:
@Tydie said:
I'm so glad someone said something, I've been concerned about this for a while as well. As an African American myself I found it to be very insulting. This is especially true when you see almost every Cannibal wearing that specific cosmetic.. it kinda hurts deep down because you know they're doing it as a joke and its a running gag in the community.oooor its because thats the only mask they have unlocked yet, as its fairly easy to get due to the fact that almost every 2nd player plays as claudette.
but yeah. just look at it like everyone is racist and wants to insult you, without even knowing you. i bet that is a great way to look at life ^^It's just a simple case of who is truly the racist ones here, reality is, the only ones here who are racist are the ones pointing the finger about how it's racist and then calling people ignorant for not agreeing, point is, none of them would have even noticed if they themself were not racist enough to get the idea in there head then fire out at everyone about it.
Much like in real life, the only true racist ones are the ones calling everyone racist.
Which in turn is not ever gonna stop racism, it only makes people more angry to be called racist when they are not and makes the situation worse. -
@Unit said:
Stop being so goddamn sensitive as a fellow African American I find it amusing and enjoyable. Y'all need to let bygones be bygones and shut the [BAD WORD] up.Pretty much the best answer to be given in this case. +1
Even though i'm not african american, I just know better than to be this racist about a serial killer taking equal rights into what face he would like to wear~
Worst part about this is these same exact people posting this would be pissed if claudette was the only original survivor excluded from it, No win scenario here.
-
@BanAnnazX said:
Attackfrog said:
BanAnnazX said:
Tydie said:@Avariku said:
if claudettes face gets removed as a cosmetic option, I think it's only fair to remove all of them...
whites and asians aren't the only ones who deserve to have their faces cut off.
Yes, they should. I don't recall leatherface ever wearing a black persons face in the movies. Also, asian people don't have a history with people mocking them by pretending to be their race by wearing a mask..
As an Asian myself, we do have issues with yellow face being used in media. That’s why I’m encouraging to remove all masks. I’m tired of reading racist comment after a match. To sit here and say it’s not a real issue because it’s a game is ignorant. It’s an issue that’s many of us acknowledge and I’m sorry you few people commenting don’t have the brain capacity to understand that this shouldn’t even be included in the game.
Somehow insulting people who have a different opinion than you is ok though? Again, the racial double standard.
Let me ask you this, which nobody has answered yet:
Would it be ok if Leatherface was black instead of white?
You are literally saying that it’s okay that people use it with ill intentions. It doesn’t matter.... black face/whiteface/ yellowface.... they are all racially insensitive. In old Asian tv shows they used whiteface.... and that might not be an issue to you since you are a majority... but racism is racism. It doesn’t matter what race they or you are. It’s inappropriate. It should be removed.
This would be another form of actual racism over something as silly as a non real life situation.
-
@Not_Giche said:
@AlexAnarchy said:
But if Claudette's face wasn't included we would have people jumping up and down saying she's been excluded etc.Yeah, this is easily one of those ( There is no way to win scenarios )
What is beyond me is that peoples are still feeding it.
Boredom i guess.
I'd more a less consider it the idea of proving some reality in here about what actually being racist is, is what got me involved.
-
@RekinShark said:
But if Claudette's face wasn't included we would have people jumping up and down saying she's been excluded etc.Yeah, this is easily one of those ( There is no way to win scenarios )
And even worse in the entire situation is the fact only a couple of people here have been actually racistly posting here and the few who have are the ones who are gonna hate being pointed out the most for it.
-
@Tydie said:
@popoles said:
It may be because I don't come from America, but how is it racist?
I mean, if we want to be equal, everything has to be possible for both sides.
So if the developers said, that LF can wear faces of all original characters, BUT Claudette, I am sure some people would start complaining.And if the LF was black and wearing white faces, would that be ok or would you fight for equality of the white people?
Ahhh, sorry, but I am so tired of the double-edged sword.because of history
And History can never be healed if people keep living in it and try too keep others living in it.
Nor should anyone who has no part in it be held up for the history they we're not even part of, however we see this happen every single day. -
@BanAnnazX said:
Attackfrog said:
Tydie said:@Attackfrog said:
Tydie said:
@Ayeknill_lava said: I'm glad this discussion is finally happening. There isn't a day that goes by where I look at my skin color and think of myself as someone who gets treated less than most people. Because this is the reality I live in day by day basis I'm used to it which is pretty said to say. I don't think it's asking too much to understand our side. Where in the past people have mocked our skin color for being too dark and advertising bleaching cream to make our complexion lighter. In the past Caucasian people were used blackface as entertainment, over doing their lips with lipstick and covering the whole face in black to mock and make us look silly. Black face was used to make a mockery of African Americans. So when i see a Caucasian putting a black mask on. Look at it in my perspective or at least try to. I get that some of you might say.. well he does white faces too.. well in the past Caucasian people didn't make fun of your whole race using some mask did they? No they didn't. Exactly, I think people forget our history or they just refuse to step into our shoes. The ignorance needs to stop. Words like that perpetuate the "us vs them"mentality. There is no such thing as "separate but equal" but phrases like the one you just used perpetuate that very separatism. There is usually a double standard when things like this are called out (which you just highlighted), which is probably why there are so many "lol"s being thrown out in this thread.
There are very real race issues out there but the issue in this thread is definitely not one of them and focusing on this is a slap in the face to people who experience racism every day.
Did you really just trivialize this situation? " There are very real race issues out there" How can you even say that? You talk like someone who doesn't know anything about being a minority. You can't just deem this case of racism less racist than the next because what does that even entail? racism is racism.
You are putting events in this game on the same level as the salary gap and socio-economic differences, and racial profiling??
This HAS to be A troll post, right? If not...
A very small world you live in. I envy your blissful ignorance. It's ok, other folks will fight the real battles for you.
Do you think racism and homophobia are not real issues? These are things I deal with every day. And very surprisingly things I deal with in dbd. People say [BAD WORD] up ######### not knowing who it could hurt. I’m offended you don’t think these issues are a ‘real battle’ but maybe that’s because you a middle aged white military man. Just guessing by what you say. Have a nice week
This is a videogame folks, this is'nt real people being killed irl over racist reasons, this is a videogame.
-
@Ayeknill_lava said:
@Attackfrog said:
Ayeknill_lava said:@Attackfrog said:
And there is the proof. I am afraid as long as you continue with you "us vs them" attitude, you will never be happy. It is actually YOU who is saying we are different and I can't understand because of the pigment of MY skin....which you assume is white.
I am afraid you are actually the one being racist in our discussion.
Well I am because you are defending blackface because there is YOU VS THEM if black people are being mocked your laying down and letting them trample you and your ancestors because there is being blackface being thrown at your face constantly and people using it as a troll cosmetic. You can be afraid all you want however I am strong and I stand for things that are offensive. However calling me racist a person who is defending one of the most offensive things in the world... I wish you peace and love because you need it.
This is what they call, using racism as a weapon...it does not make racism go away, it only makes the situation worse.
And yes, it is a form of racism to use Racism as a weapon.this is basically the same as posting you want the world to be at peace between the races but then say your defending black people from white people cuz RE5 had a white guy shooting african zombies...in Africa......the only one who's really being racist in that case, is you.
I do not recall anyone in Spain being upset that an americna white man was shooting spaniards in RE4...in Spain.
-
This reminds me of back when resident evil 5 came out and that one guy was quoted on the gaming news as claiming that all zombies should be white..
case and point is however, If people would quit searching for any reason to call out ther racism card and then make a huge end of the world issue out of it, Racism woud'nt be such an issue.
Seriously folks, I doubt LF cares about the color of the skin he wears for his mask, only people who are looking to cry RACIST do.
Though I would love someone to try and call a serial killer out as a racist cuz he's gonna kill them..let'see if he changes his mind about killing them or just does it in a worse way because of the aggitation that would likely cause them?
-
Yup, major ban wave this time, quite a lot got a swift swing of the ban hammer for ther constant d/cing.
-
everyone knew d/cing constantly was not okay months ago, the bans are all well deserved.
-
Every other online game out there has a ban punishment for abusing the d/c button, a bunch of people got well deserved bans today and that's all there is too it, if you did not do what you've known was wrong months ago then you got nothing to worry about, if you got banned for it then you deserved it.
-
@Saelon said:
Good, she requires a nice amount of skill which is always welcome in the game. I think she has very good potential.lol....facepalms
-
@SenzuDuck said:
@MhhBurgers said:
So tell me who the [BAD WORD] would be able to play her if you cannot see survivors, you cannot track them (and don't tell me you are able to land a hit on them with how bad even with predator scratchmarks are unless they run into stuff like windows/pallets) and on top of that you'Re also slower than them ROFL. When I think the devs have bad Ideas I listen to crap like this.Go and watch some twitch streams kiddo, you'll see plenty of people using her.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/315353140?t=58m17s
Heres a video of me 4King against a rank three, two rank 5s and a rank 9.
2 Dstrikes & an insta heal btw, probably SWF but who cares.
and yes, im not a rank 1 killer (because i play more games now) but hey, swf is unbeatable, right?Yes cuz no one has ever seen new killers do great for the first month of release while everyone is getting used too them still right? I forget we apperantly rank killers by ther first day~
-
@Sarief said:
@MikeLatin7 said:
It's a ok killer. A good idea, but some of her perks don't make sense. She need to see scratches, that is part of her power, but why does blood hound and sloppy butcher combo looks like it's not working or even hinders than on other killers? And her speed is so slow that any survivor, injured or not, can evade her without pallets in the chase. They say her speed is 110% but I don't think so. All killer's speed should be 110% but that's not happening. (EN: actually, it's different per killer, with Males 115% and females 110% under different circumstances) All the time, most killers do OK in the smaller map but not in the larger maps this should be fix a.s.a.p. not everyone is having this speed problem but I do and other players do too. When Phase Walk is active I don't see husk like in other videos on Youtube.tl;dr: I can't play and survivors run away from me. Buff her speed asap, because I can't use her well from the start.
solution: git gud
solution - don't buy trash tier from release.
-
@Vadim239 said:
I mean killer gets way more than a survivor. Maybe its reasonable if we take into account that there are 4 survivors. 4vs1. But when I play survivor, it is for fun, not for points, because even if I take 4 stacks We're gonna live forever, it's hard to even match the killer's points. I play killer to get more points, and survivor to have fun. Can I do both at the same time pls?gee...it's almost like the killer is by themself and there are 4 survivors fighting for points....
-
The devs themselves were asked this the stream after, and they pretty much said they found Quentin to be the more unique and interesting character from the remake movie, plus let's be fair..if it had'nt been for Quentin, Nancy would have been freddies plaything forever...
-
@Vietfox said:
yeet said:just don't get caught you crybaby if you get camped it's your fault
Killer who needs to camp in order to get a kill detected
survivor who needs pallet looping to win spotted
-
@feffrey said:
This goes back to what I was saying killers expect a free handout for their lack of skills and failuresand survivors do any better? How full of it are you today?
hypocrite much? -
@feffrey said:
Oh really? Pretty sure killers have it easy it doesn't take a brain to mash the attack buttonso full of the cowpies...
-
@feffrey said:
Why should they be rewarded for their failureswhy should survivors be rewarded for not being able to lose the killer and instead running in circles thus failing to lose the killer?
-
When a mod even says no and yet the Op still continues begging for nerfs...
-
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@DarkGGhost said:
When the new chapter come out don't play any killer for 1-2 weeks. I know is to much but this is the only way devs will hear us and start giving buff to the killers too. The reazon is if the 70% of killer stop playing so the 70% of surrs can't play the game.THE KILLERS JUST GOT BIG BUFFS i cant flashlight save anymore unless the killer is smart and puts his head into a wall or scares me away by hitting me. and also if your STILL complaining about survivors body blocking it is something THEY PUT INTO THE GAME ON PURPOSE have you heard of Were Gonna Live Forever it gives us points if we get hit by the killer when he is carrying a survivor.
killers got big buffs it says...
-
review bombed the game...who did that again exactly?
-
Such a new player and yet already so toxic and entitled...
-
Really bad bait...
-
Another survivor main asking for a free escape or some kind of way to abuse the camping system that's been working as intended from day one of release..
-
@BLUE_APE said:
DBD became balanced and looping and camping were not allowed/viable anymore?What if you all started playing the game the way it was meant to be played, and called out the devs then?
My thought is Dev's are allowing camping because they are allowing Looping.
So why give the DEVs a good reason to stop looping.The devs have been allowing camping even before the game was released...watch dev diary 3 killers.
However, not once have they ever legitimized pallet looping. -
@feffrey said:
Why are killers whinning so hard because "We survivors" only have pallets as protection and they want to take that from us. They've already took our perks
Every killers I've faced lately complains about urban Evasion, Desesive strike and borrowed time....Honestly if killers want a free hand out like always.. They should spawn 1 survivor dead, 1 survivor on a hook another one down and the last one injured....
If killers get their way this game will be one sided.. I get that some killers at smart enough to deal with looping or to lwave that one survivor alone.
I understand that looping can be difficult to counter..
Why want killers just admit to being out played?
why ca'nt survivors stop posting death threats too me when I play killer and outplay them?
-
@JustSomeGuy said:
@AlexAnarchy said:
the pallet animation being faster or whatever is not gonna stop hits from getting through still if you continue to poorly time your drops.It will. They are gonna make it so it stuns pretty much as soon as it begins to be thrown down rather than at the end so that means that if you press space you will not be hit.
Nope, the hit animation will just start going through at the stun still, just at the beginning as well, goodluck though trying to convince anyone it won't happen after.
-
another cry thread about something that's not going to be punished cuz they just want to abuse the punishemnt.
-
Not holding item when you die or escape? Then how is white ward supposed to help you?
-
@hill_o said:
@azazer said:
hill_o said:@Tsulan said:
@Raccoon said:
It's pretty sad that a seemingly unfixable "exploit" can become a two year old game's most usable strategy .
It´s not a bug, it´s a feature!
You're joking, but it actually is.
If there was no looping, chases would end pretty immediately most of the time. There's not very many features that encourage hiding. The red strikes are incredibly easy to follow, so if you're not running perks to make them vanish then evading a killer in chase is near impossible given the large speed differential.
I'm not saying looping is fun for everyone, but it's not like it's a bug or exploit anyone is using to break the game. It's just literally the only mechanic that was working in for the survivor side of chases.
But devs have stated chases were never meant to take long. You basically admitted not looping would mean the game was being played as envisioned. You're right that it isn't technically an exploit but it negates the speed advantage the killer was always intended to have which actually does break the game. Looping is the root cause of major game troubles. It caused pallet reduction and nerfs and dilated chase time means gens are too fast ( the gen rush effect). The unintended use of the smaller collision box that allows looping is creating a cascading negative effect on the game.
The devs say a lot of things. I've also heard them say that stealth isn't supposed to be a mechanic, which seems counter intuitive if they want chases to be short and anyone to play survivor for longer than a match or two.
I agree about the generator issue-- something about the mechanic of the game is fundamentally broken. It puts a lot of pressure on the very start of the match to go somewhat flawlessly for the killer, or for the survivors to make major mistakes later on. Neither of those are particularly fun scenarios.
That being said, I don't really feel like looping could be removed from the game as the game currently is. I don't know what a better solution is, unfortunately, but it would be nice to find some sort of middle ground where killers aren't rushed first thing in the game and survivors have at least some hope of escaping a few chases here and there.
Hmmm game that was commercialized form the beginning as a stealth play game for survivor has devs that say stealth was never supposed to be part of the game? You really need to post the evidence of this cuz otherwise, it's pretty obvious that your full of ######### otherwise.
-
Q&A first of all means nothing with these devs, they promise alot but barely even half of it comes.
Pallets are not broken, they require different timing so you need to adjust your timing and loop less if needed.
the pallet animation being faster or whatever is not gonna stop hits from getting through still if you continue to poorly time your drops.
and last but not least, pallets are not safehavens nor ever will be again so your gonna have to just get used to being hit during the drop if your not gonna even try to adapt. -
What I love is the fact they think this is some form of skill...I'd love them to go and proclaim the skill of running in circles to call of duty players or..well..any other online game really...
-
@feffrey said:
Do you think the survivors should be able to see who the killer is during the lobby screen?
Killers are able to see who the survivors are and plan ahead if they do not dodge
But do you think it should be the same for survivors?I would like to know if I could plan ahead against certain killers and switch my perks out to face that killer.
survivors one day were able to see what or who the killer was, but they started dodging killers who camped or killed them so lobbies were breaking all the time and the devs took that ability away...
-
Still able to run corners faster than killers at the same rate so nope..they have not gotten bigger.
-
@hill_o said:
@Tsulan said:
@hill_o said:
You're joking, but it actually is.
If there was no looping, chases would end pretty immediately most of the time. There's not very many features that encourage hiding. The red strikes are incredibly easy to follow, so if you're not running perks to make them vanish then evading a killer in chase is near impossible given the large speed differential.
I'm not saying looping is fun for everyone, but it's not like it's a bug or exploit anyone is using to break the game. It's just literally the only mechanic that was working in for the survivor side of chases.
If looping didn´t exist, survivors would have learned how to juke the killer. There are more than enough ways to do this. But running in circles is simply easier and thus faster to learn.
Agree to disagree. As someone who plays killer and survivor pretty equally, juking isn't nearly as effective as some people make it out to be and can be pretty easily countered depending on the map and the killer. That can't be the only tactic survivors have.
survivors did just fine before pallet looping, they can easily do just as fine without it if they'd stop making excuses to not even try anything else.
-
another cry thread about something that's not going to be punished cuz they just want to abuse the punishment.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS3DvvOQI04
Educate yourself. -
Here, this may help you to understand, Camping was commercialized as a viable strat before the game even came out, pallet looping never has been even stated as legit gameplay from a dev yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS3DvvOQI04 -
Nope. Git gud.
-
@feffrey said:
Don't face camp and get good then?How about not pallet looping and git gud then?
-
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
@SadonicShadow said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
I agree with this. Bloodlust is a bandaid for a much larger issue. I would take balanced maps over bloodlust any day. Hopefully before the end of 2018 every map is balanced so that there is no critical time wasters or safe spots and then BL rightfully gets the axe.
I hope so. With proper balance of maps and BL gone, I would have more reason to start playing the game again. > @WalterWh1te said:
Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.
Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
100% agree. If you rely on current BL 3 to catch someone something is wrong.
Also the pallet interaction didn't feel intuitive in the PTB. Getting a hit on someone after the stun should have kicked in is no bueno.
Those changes are not a overnight reaction to some reviews. Its a general roadmap to make the game fun for both sides.
This includes more fluid animations and interactions.
But keep on going with the victim entertainment. Its pretty hilarious tbh.
Oh yeah, a hit after the stun sounds no bueno, even though it could be latency? Considering the amount of posts I saw about that, I doubt it is latency though. That doesn't sound too fancy to me. It might change with the animation change that McLean showed on Stream though, because it could explain some issues with the pallets on both sides.
@KillingInstinct said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
@KillingInstinct said:
@Gay Myers (Luzi) said:
Bloodlust needs to go. It promotes bad killer plays and requires you to learn less. It's one of the reasons I stopped playing killers aside from killers FOV and flashlights white screen giving me migraines. I hated using BL and I would instantly lose it if I ever reached tier III, because it meant for that I did not play optimally.Yes, maps need adjusting still and I can prolly live with BL staying until then, but once maps get balanced, it needs to go.
Also when you're hooked, you're not doing anything. It makes perfect sense exhaustion cooldown would go down when you're hooked.
While that may be true. They are first beginning with BL and not with the map balance. Killers are just getting nerfed again and it pisses me off. ''Hey! The survivor players gave us over 440 bad reviews in one day and over 650 in two days. Let's reward with buffs and killer nerfs, am I right?''
You can't possibly say that ######### is fair at all! They have to buff Brutal Strength then so we can still keep up with the survivors!
BS is fine where it is and anymore buffs would make it way too strong. There is a difference between balancing and just outstraight oping stuff. Numbers need to be treated carefully in DBD, because the multipliers are really weird, so buffing BS in numbers might just break the perk.
Balancing is nerfing and buffing on both sides. You cannot get anything right immediately. I've never seen that done in any game that XY patch was right away the perfect patch. I never said things are fair, because a lot of things are unfair in the game for both sides, but when I look at these changes I'm usually very cold towards them. They make sense to me on a rational basis.
They needed to lower BL so people can start to learn mindgames, because a lot of players are nowadays new players who never played the game with no BL, so they can get used to a different type of game and develop new strategies, because the end goal is to remove it once maps are balanced. I do believe lowering the numbers are needed before that can happen at all, even after map balance, because a ice cold removal of the feature would throw a lot of players out of the loop.
Like others points out, that change was mentioned several times in the past few weeks.
Balancing is nerfing and buffing, yes. But this game is branded as asymmetrical. It should be power vs numbers. It's power vs numbers with power right now.
A BS buff wouldn't make it OP. IT would make it how it used to be. Even if it's only up to 30%.
They should buff all killers a bit. Make MM like he used to be for example. Almost infinite stalking range and stacking EW succ speed
MM is in a good place right now. Infinite stalking range would literally break the game due to the render issues with some objects causing him to look through some objects. I think his stalking right now is bugged, at least the way he is collecting his stalk from survivors when a red survivors in the frame - it slows down, so it can hinder your process.
And no, currently how the game is any buff to BS would make it too strong. BS is in a really good place right now and it can cut off enough to catch up to someone and I think there will not be a buff in the near future for it considering the pallet changes.
Buff the killers generally, yes, but even if it's asymmetrical, you cannot buff something to hell and risk that a huge amount of players won't have fun. There is a difference between making a scary and thrilling experience and a unfair and unfun experience. Depending on the way you do it, it can shift to the unfair and unfun side really quickly and it's not even a matter of adapting. No amount of adapting can change the unfairness of some things and if they just get frustrating, it's not a good change.
So basically, it should just forever be an unfun and unfair experience for 11 out of 12 killers at all times clearly and a super fun bullying experience for survivors with the fact that even camping is now getting punished when killers have barely anything left they can do to get kills because gens still get done in less than 3 minutes and killers only real power is slowing time down nice seeing that insidious will now be needed to be buffed to work against this or its just another useless killer perk soon.
-
@Jack11803 said:
@ChesterTheMolester said:
The lack of the void increases a Killers chances if hes already in the lunge while you spam your spacebar, the time it takes to stun the Killer once you start throwing it down is the same.Actual there’s a big with the stun, that keeps the killers active hurtbox for a second. I juked a leatherface in hospital, he tantrums near a pallet, I walk up to it, then slam the pallet. The slam pulled him to the center (for the stun animation) and instantly downed me through the completely thrown pallet. It’s a problem
There is no bug at all, your timing is just really bad if your getting hit through the pallet, try dropping sooner.
-
Not bugged at all, ya'll just have to learn the new timing and stop expecting pallets to be 100% safe now that they are back to the way they used too be.
All they did was revert the patch that made the vacuums, so pallets are risky again cuz you don't know how to time them right anymore, try changing your timing and acknowledging, your probably just not good with it as I and many others can time them right as well as get stunned without hitting them due to proper timing, case and point as usual with near every survivor issue....Git gud.
-
another day, another person dumb enough to think camping needs punishment.
-
Not even remotely true, stop crying.
-
@Mercury said:
It's already there- called 'Remember me?'. Adding onto that would just make things broken as... a broken thing. I think it tops of with bonus of 30 seconds, so you'd want Survivor's having to stand still at an exit for an entire minute, hell even 90 seconds with the perk on top? This shouldn't be end-game balance. This is not the way it should be taken.meh, Just add it on on normal basis and we can get rid of the perk.