Dead_by_David
Dead_by_David
About
- Username
- Dead_by_David
- Joined
- Visits
- 447
- Last Active
Comments
-
@fcc2014 said:
Feng is the only one worth it but im not a fan of the fact cosmetics are not event exclusive. Anyone can just buy them.This is true, they should have achievement related costumes, similar to the cute/pixel sprays in overwatch. They would have a bit more meaning then.
-
I would main Kate because I like her snow gear but Feng's new outfit is pretty good
-
How do you know that you are playing with people from other country's? I thought that all games put you in certain servers with the same region?
-
Ruin is annoying if it is every game but it is good for shaking things up normally. Ruin games are the ones I practice hitting great skill checks.
If we are locking things out can we please lock out lockers. I am very tired of people just hiding in them all game!
-
@RWoodrow I hope so, he was only wasting his own!
@EntityDispleased It was fairly offensive but not very creative!
@Tsulan I already have the achievment if it is the one I think you mean. It was incredibly tense for me, my blood pressure was through the roof xD
-
@EntityDispleased said:
@Dead_by_David said:
110% confirmed to be Jerry from Tom and Jerry.I was thinking cousin muscles would be better.
He is more likely to kill xD or it could be the big dog who's name I don't know
-
110% confirmed to be Jerry from Tom and Jerry.
-
@tanya3489 said:
My group of friends and I have had to deal with half hour to an hour wait time for about a month now. We're about [BAD WORD] done with itIt is no one wanting to play killer, not really something that can be fixed without completely ignoring the rank system then people complain that they are always matched with good players when they are new.
-
I like this, it is so annoying when they just unhook you on purpose in front of killer for the points. I don't think it is classed as cheating but the option to resist would be nice!
-
@ColgateAdvancedWhite said:
Identity V is done in collaboration by Behaviour and NetEase. It's sort-of their mobile port.http://archive.deadbydaylight.com/posts/2018/cooperation-with-netease-games/
Oh wow I did not know this! I thought it was very similar maps. It is a shame it does not have Nea or Piggy but it will do
-
MegaWaffle said:
@Dead_by_David said:
No, this pill is hard to swallow.
Sorry to tell you but that's a suppository.
I hope so
-
No, this pill is hard to swallow.
-
AshleyWB said:Delete Nea and you can have insidious how about that?
Noooo!
-
MyNamePete said:
Buff survivors by adding a shirtless option for all of them
If you do this for survivors I demand topless skins for all killers!
-
@Febb3 said:
the survivor should be a man or a girl.Are these the only options?
-
I have found that the mid rank area is the worst, rank 1 was bad but it was not every match
-
@Theluckyboi said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@Theluckyboi said:
I think they still need to design facial expressions for Legion, the models seemed to lack that.Do the other killers have facial expressions that happen? I have never actually seen this :O
Spirit and Clown both have facial expressions, and they were pretty costly to make
I can imagine! I would not mind them without expressions though, it is not really something you notice to much
-
@Theluckyboi said:
I think they still need to design facial expressions for Legion, the models seemed to lack that.Do the other killers have facial expressions that happen? I have never actually seen this :O
-
Did Sony not bring in the Bluetooth connector for the implants? I remember people were discussing it a time back?
This would be a massive help for the hard of hearing game community.
-
@LCGaster said:
I would use Iron Will instead of Dark Sense, in case the killer hit you and you want to escape by sneaking away under his nose, otherwise the perks David advised are great for stealthAlso very true but I don't have Iron Will xD
-
No problem! I main Nea so I got Urban easy but had to wait for self care to appear in the shrine xD
-
I always use Urban Evasion, Self Care, Spine Chill and Dark Sense. These help me move away from a gen when the killer comes and plan a sneaky retreat in the opposite direction to the killer when I finish a gen.
-
I think the RBT needs more because I am not afraid when one goes on me. It is easy to deal with and at the most keeps me off the generators for a few minutes.
I want to feel like I am in one of Jigsaws games not being gifted unwanted hats.
-
Orphan and Ju-On!
-
I take your pizza and raise it 1 diabetes -
RoKrueger said:
Just trying to be funnyDead_by_David said:@RoKrueger I used to be survivor main, I play both now but why is if I play survivor I am instantly teabagging? T-bagging is hilarious, though 
Hope you are feeling better.
I am thank you, it was my right thumb so ability to tea bag was not effected xD
-
@RoKrueger I used to be survivor main, I play both now but why is if I play survivor I am instantly teabagging?
-
se05239 said:
@Master said:
@Dead_by_David said:
I do not think they should be able to give up when ever they want, this will be abused. It should give the option a certain amount of time after gates open though.Abused in what way?
Survivors would have less fun being dicks to killers.
Yes this is good response
-
@PiiFree said:
@Dead_by_David said:
I do have respect for people that battle the bullying, I hate bullying. I just do not want to be disconnected all the time when there is no problem.No one is going to give up when there is no problem
Then I would hope that this would be a good change xD
-
@PiiFree said:
@Dead_by_David said:
Very true but they should enforce the disconnecting bans, not make it OK to do. This would make me just want to play killer if I kept waiting for matches that end straight away.If it is what the majority of killers want then maybe they should have it. I just want to play the game and all of the quiters make it unfun. (on both sides, as I said survivors are wores for it).
Killers already have a high tolerance when it comes to annoyances and frustration, it happens very rarely that a Killer gives up and blatantly disconnects. They rather afk in a corner or in the basement to admit defeat but still give Survivors their "deserved" victory points. Sad thing? That's exactly when Killers get abused and held hostage which leads to DCs instead of a "fair" defeat.
Survivors on the other hand disconnect left and right for ridiculous reasons with no shame. The last 51 matches I kept track of DCs, a total of 19!!! matches included DCs. And then they wonder why escape rates are relatively low, no wonder when ~40% of the matches are rigged.
I can asure you that even if there was a "Give up" option, Killers would only use it if they really don't see any way to turn the match.
I respect you a lot for this but at the same time not everyone is you. I have found a lot of killers to be friendly (a bit odd for killer xD) but there are trolls that play killer as well. Some killers may not DC because they are afraid to be punished and now they will (I mean for no reason)
I do have respect for people that battle the bullying, I hate bullying. I just do not want to be disconnected all the time when there is no problem.
-
739 hours, my second most played game!
-
@Master said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@Master said:
@Dead_by_David said:
I do not think they should be able to give up when ever they want, this will be abused. It should give the option a certain amount of time after gates open though.Abused in what way?
I can see people quiting straight away if totems are found or they get a map they do not like and maybe just to annoy people. I am not saying everyone will do this and I do think that there should be an end game quit button once the doors are open as the end game is rubbish as a killer.
People can already do that right now because DCing isnt punished properly, so thats not a reason against a concede option
Very true but they should enforce the disconnecting bans, not make it OK to do. This would make me just want to play killer if I kept waiting for matches that end straight away.
If it is what the majority of killers want then maybe they should have it. I just want to play the game and all of the quiters make it unfun. (on both sides, as I said survivors are wores for it).
-
@Master said:
@Dead_by_David said:
I do not think they should be able to give up when ever they want, this will be abused. It should give the option a certain amount of time after gates open though.Abused in what way?
I can see people quiting straight away if totems are found or they get a map they do not like and maybe just to annoy people. I am not saying everyone will do this and I do think that there should be an end game quit button once the doors are open as the end game is rubbish as a killer.
-
That is fair enough that you want the option to give up, I understand that it can be frustrating when you are losing and the opposite side gets cocky and this can be much worse for killer as they do not have the option to leave.
I am not against killers or survivors and not trying to pick sides. in this situation I am against people who quit because it is to hard instead of just playing the game or people who quit because they get hooked or found first or get hit with a flashlight or pallet.
As I have repeatedly said I believe this option should be available in the end game because it is the end game and it should end but a lot of people refuse to end it and bully the killer and it is not fair that they have control.
In all the time I have been playing it is so much rarer for killers to DC than survivor and I respect them for this but I do not want to sit waiting to find a lobby, wait in lobby because there is always someone who is not ready, sit through loading screen to join in, I go to play and bam! Killer quits because his totem has spawned on Claudettes boob!
-
@PiiFree said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@PiiFree said:
@Dead_by_David said:
I do not think they should be able to give up when ever they want, this will be abused. It should give the option a certain amount of time after gates open though.Explain to me why Killers shouldn't have the power to give up whenever they want and how this would be abused.
You don't even know any specific detail about a possible solution, yet already make claims about it?
It is not a claim, it is an opinion. It would just mean people could quit as soon as they find something they dislike, which would make it more annoying for the people who just want to play the game.
Yes survivors have this ability but survivors should not have this ability, no one should and if you give it to everyone the game is just going to be more and more about just quiting when you get caught/start losing which is toxic behaviour all the same.
@Milord This is what everyone wants!
You don't know if it will be abused or not, yet you claimed that it WILL be abused.
Survivors already have this option so I see no reason why Killers shouldn't have the possibility to end the game if they wish to do so.
Your argument is that it would make it annoying for the other players - but have you ever thought that the Killer might want to disconnect because the other players make it annoying for them in first place? Being forced to go through a game that is simply frustrating - that's annoying. Especially since many survivors like to hold the game hostage until you effectively force them out.
I fully understand how this annoys killers, it is a constant thing that survivors will not leave when the game is finished and the hatch is ridiculous. That is why I think it should be an option after the gate is open or the hatch has been opened.
People do things that annoy me and make the game less enjoyable all the time whether I am a killer or a survivor. Camping is boring and going up against a toxic SWF group is even more so but I do not want to quit because that just makes the game a waste of time. If the game is held hostage at the end then I 110% believe that you should be able to finish it but otherwise you might as well make disconnecting not bannable because that is what it would be.
I do not believe that killing yourself on a hook should be a thing either but I do not know how they would fix that without giving either side the advantage.
-
@PiiFree said:
@Dead_by_David said:
I do not think they should be able to give up when ever they want, this will be abused. It should give the option a certain amount of time after gates open though.Explain to me why Killers shouldn't have the power to give up whenever they want and how this would be abused.
You don't even know any specific detail about a possible solution, yet already make claims about it?
It is not a claim, it is an opinion. It would just mean people could quit as soon as they find something they dislike, which would make it more annoying for the people who just want to play the game.
Yes survivors have this ability but survivors should not have this ability, no one should and if you give it to everyone the game is just going to be more and more about just quiting when you get caught/start losing which is toxic behaviour all the same.
@Milord This is what everyone wants!
-
Ranking was very important for them, I would feel bad if they were friendly!!!
-
I do not think they should be able to give up when ever they want, this will be abused. It should give the option a certain amount of time after gates open though.
-
I would much rather just do what I do now and just buy the skin I want.
Plus I heard that if you buy the pass in Fortnight you are a virgin? I do not know if this is true but I do not want to risk it!
-
@adalesmo said:
@Orion said:
@adalesmo said:
@Orion said:
@ShyN3ko said:
First:
You can hide.
Second:
Nurse is the only killer with skill impact.
If the killer player have more skill than the survivors, then he can win the game.
The other 12 killers dont have this.
The killer player can have more skill than the survivors, but when he play Pig(just an example), he can still lose the game.This is why she's a near-perfect Killer, from a design perspective, and why Survivors hate her so much.
Nurse is the most broken killer, far from "near-perfect". If you're consistently at rank 1 right after reset each month, you will continuously go against nurses who have quite literally zero counter. Breaking line of sight does nothing, doubling back does nothing, mindgaming in the corners of the map does nothing. There is zero counter whatsoever for an experienced nurse player.
Every killer should be able to down a survivor, you should not be able to be looped for 5 gens, etc., this is all obvious. But a killer who can teleport twice through barriers instantaneously is a fundamentally flawed concept for a game where the barriers are a survivor's only real defense, at least with it's current execution.
Survivors hate Nurse because she's fundamentally unfair.
Her power is rewarding to use correctly and punishing if used incorrectly. However, for all her power helps during a chase, it does nothing to help her find or track Survivors.
Note how your complaints only focus around the fact that she's good during a chase, ignoring the fact that there's a key aspect of the game that Survivors failed at in order for a chase to even begin: stealth. Chases don't happen unless you failed to hide.Hiding is not a viable strategy in DBD. You can't finish generators while hiding. Survivors who use stealth as their strat are virtually always the dead weight of the team who never do anything. People who promote stealth as as strat never play survivor.
@KingSavageGaming said:
Nerf the only viable killer that requires skill no we don't need every killer to be a jokeYes, muscle memory and looking where you want to go sure is skillful with no viable counterplay.
Actually I only ever try stealth and most of the time I do more generators than the rest of the team. It can go wrong if I get caught but it is not impossible to do.
-
I have not been able to get in a game for a while now, thought I had been banned at first because it kept disconnecting
-
@Orion said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@Orion said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@Orion said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@AshleyWB Oh, I could understand if they made a murderer Jesus or Tom Cruise but a priest of nondescript religion may be OK?That's up to the religious groups who're offended by unflattering depictions of their respective religions.
I understand that this may be taken as offensive. I respect that people each have there own beliefs but sometimes I wonder what the harm is if it is not an insult intended.
Some people perceive anything that isn't total support of their PoV to be opposition to their PoV. If you point out anything wrong that they said, they turn hostile and perceive you as an enemy.
In this case, if anything is seen as unflattering, they decry it as being a mockery of their beliefs and call for censure. Hell, for some groups, just depicting something that is loosely based on their beliefs is enough to trigger them, because it'll never be accurate (never mind the fact that every religion has a metric ton of denominations).
Unfortunately for those of us who just want good entertainment and don't mind if the entertainment is satirical or doesn't accurately portray religious beliefs, these groups sometimes hold positions of power; either directly by literally being the ruling class, or indirectly by having great numbers. Thus, they can have good entertainment pulled just because they didn't like it by creating a major shitstorm. It's happened many times this century, primarily with TV series and movies, but also in the form of book burnings.So true! Religion has so much power as unfortunately with most things the loudest are the ones heard!
@AshleyWB I remember this, I understand that a large amount of people would not want to see this however I doupt that most of them would buy a south park game!
It'll get a lot worse if the rising neo-Nazi movement gets their way.
Yes, that will be a troubling time if you do not fit to the ideals that they believe. I believe in free speech but not speech of hatred.
-
@Orion said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@Orion said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@AshleyWB Oh, I could understand if they made a murderer Jesus or Tom Cruise but a priest of nondescript religion may be OK?That's up to the religious groups who're offended by unflattering depictions of their respective religions.
I understand that this may be taken as offensive. I respect that people each have there own beliefs but sometimes I wonder what the harm is if it is not an insult intended.
Some people perceive anything that isn't total support of their PoV to be opposition to their PoV. If you point out anything wrong that they said, they turn hostile and perceive you as an enemy.
In this case, if anything is seen as unflattering, they decry it as being a mockery of their beliefs and call for censure. Hell, for some groups, just depicting something that is loosely based on their beliefs is enough to trigger them, because it'll never be accurate (never mind the fact that every religion has a metric ton of denominations).
Unfortunately for those of us who just want good entertainment and don't mind if the entertainment is satirical or doesn't accurately portray religious beliefs, these groups sometimes hold positions of power; either directly by literally being the ruling class, or indirectly by having great numbers. Thus, they can have good entertainment pulled just because they didn't like it by creating a major shitstorm. It's happened many times this century, primarily with TV series and movies, but also in the form of book burnings.So true! Religion has so much power as unfortunately with most things the loudest are the ones heard!
@AshleyWB I remember this, I understand that a large amount of people would not want to see this however I doupt that most of them would buy a south park game!
-
@Orion said:
@Dead_by_David said:
@AshleyWB Oh, I could understand if they made a murderer Jesus or Tom Cruise but a priest of nondescript religion may be OK?That's up to the religious groups who're offended by unflattering depictions of their respective religions.
I understand that this may be taken as offensive. I respect that people each have there own beliefs but sometimes I wonder what the harm is if it is not an insult intended.
-
@friendlykillermain said:
@Peasant said:
A forum thread needs to have a clear and concise discussion topic. Your shift from numbers to candy is irrelevant, your thread may be removed by a moderator at their earliest convenience. You have been advised.oh dear you are right hmmm quick lets post something that spawns angry comments
"deciesive strike needs a buff"
"generators need to be done faster"
"ochido isnt toxic"
hmm i need more fuelCamping is a legit strategy and decisive strike needs a buff?
-
@AshleyWB Oh, I could understand if they made a murderer Jesus or Tom Cruise but a priest of nondescript religion may be OK?
-
This is good but all I can think of is the spirit of jazz from the mighty boosh when I see the picture xD
-
@AshleyWB said:
People always complain saying religious killers are forbidden. I'm pretty sure The clown is Buddhist or something.Why forbidden?
-
I really like that idea, Pharaoh or some form of mummy!
I would like to see a Frankensteins monster chapter, the man who is 10 men! That or Godzilla.......
-
I think balance is based around ability. I am very good survivor but for some reason I cannot seem to cope well against Freddy however I am very good at dealing with Nurse. Does this mean he needs a nerf and she needs a buff? No, it means my play style is no good against him and works well for her.
The only things I would change is stuff that would make it scarier but would make some killers very strong and create more issues xD