pauloandrade22
pauloandrade22
About
- Username
- pauloandrade22
- Joined
- Visits
- 45
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Chrona said:
You want a refund because people are playing one of the most advertised and suggested playstyles?!?Welp, Some people can claim to understand things. Some can't. I can't claim to understand what's going on in this guy's mind.
Im convinced that some think that killing = ######### camped me and deserves to be 8 feet under (you get what i mean).
-
@Mc_Harty said:
SovererignKing said:Easy matches my ass. Randoms who are good at the game can stomp Killers without the help of voice comms. Where’s your justification for using voice comms? You can play with your friends without them. Or you can compensate for having that “extra help” by slapping on No Mither. Won’t do that though, will you?
Look in the mirror dude, you want to call Killers chicken ######### and “only want easy matches”? What about you and your friends? You want easy matches.
Why don’t you, and a large portion of the Survivor community, man up and accept you’re getting help you shouldn’t be getting and play fair with Killers?
LOL what the [BAD WORD]?
Why are you so triggered?
It's also cute you think I'm a survivor main. Must be because I disagreed with you being justified to dodge matches unless you're going to be harrassed.
I also never said anything about voicechat being justified at all. You really showed me by arguing against a point I wasn't making. Good job.
I don't care how bad the balance is in this game, no one is justified to a win. Sorry to burst your bubble but I prefer to not have this victim mentality that plagues the killer community nowadays.
Seriously, what in the actual [BAD WORD] lol.
I belive killers have the right to avoid potential Ebulliying seesions though.
-
@superspy631 said:
TheLegendDyl4n1 said:@johnlaw1972 said:
Sorry, but it’s true. Killers who camp, which now seems to be all of them, are ruining this game. When it became free on ps4, every killer camps and it’s just not worth it to play anymore. I haven’t played one match this week where the killers didn’t go more than a few steps away from the hook. I said this in another post and I’ll say it here again, if you don’t stop camping people will stop playing as survivors. No survivors, no matches. Less people playing the game means the developers have no reason to continue to support it. I know I’m gonna get the same comments as other posts,” just don’t get caught” or “camping is part of the game”. I’m sure these are people who never play as a survivor. I’m not sure what the solution is but maybe create a game mode where a lobby is 5 people and the killer is chosen at random, and random perks.
they should get rid of all killers and i will be the true killer. NEA THE KILLER MUAHAHAHAAHA. but only i wont hit you i will just suck you dry
Dude thank you the people defending the campers are the campers but the only reason they get me down is because even if you stun them they can still hit you and if they are far from the window they can still hit you and why would the trapper camp he has traps for god sake and jigsaw omg how the f do you camp you can put a trap on them and they cant leave but please if youre gonna camp play as a survivor and let somebody camp you and thats why i only play killer these days and a good way to stop this if you give them 10 seconds of being at the hook like when we use vault it block it out but cmon timed them out this really is annoying and i really want a refund if youre not gonna fix this problem dead by deadlight.
I did do a lot of camping in my youth yeah.
And if you want to refund just refund( its impossible by the way but you can try).
-
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i am under the impression that body blocking the killer as survivor when they are carrying another survivor and blocking a hook to the point the survivor escapes it yes toxic but aloud even if you dont have the perk Were Gonna Live Forever which gives you points if he hits you. as well as saying something like "gg ez would bodyblock again" if he tunneled another survivor the entire game after he couldnt catch me when i kept looping around since he kept shocking me (he was the doctor) and i would 360 whenever he got close to the point that he let me alone. he could of easily hit me into the dying state when i bodyblocked but let me keep blocking. and also saying something like "gg ez would bodyblock again" after the game and be toxic since he tunneled the girl the entire game and yes we all escaped. i mean camping is aloud for killer and they will message me after game saying stuff like "noob survivor get owned" which i assume is aloud.Well this post just showed your true character . As i thought it was. Your type of behaviour is why "survivor mains" are ridiculed by "killer mains"(even tho they play both sides)
i play both sides and i always get a 4k and sometimes a 3k without tunneling or camping i just hook one survivor and go to the next and end up killing the mall unless one of them has the hatch. i play leatherface with BBQ, Franklins, Agitation, and NOED since i havent worked on any other killers those are the best perks i have IMO. when you tunnel one survivor the entire match instead of just hooking and going to the next you end up with 1 to no kills but if you would just go kill survivors you would almost always get 4-3 kills. i am usually around rank 7 on Xbox as killer.
I do that . still lose tho.
-
@only1biggs said:
@Master said:
@only1biggs said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@only1biggs said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@only1biggs said:
@mcNuggets said:
This maybe works on idiots, but most killers dodge 4 swf or 4x flashlights.This might work for massive idiots, but most killers know how to play around 4 swf or 4x flashlights.
I play around by avoiding them? That counts.
LOL
No, you do things that don't allow them to use the flashlights. You pick up facing away from them or face a wall. You bait pick ups. You slug, et al.
well yeah with the new update since all the killers whined about flashlight saves being op they made it to where you have to start blinding at 1 sec instead of 2 so you have to be right next to the killer when he pick up to flashlight save
It was easy to counter flashlights before the updated pick up animation. People just thought it was easier to moan instead of getting better and doing something different.
@only1biggs said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@only1biggs said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@only1biggs said:
@mcNuggets said:
This maybe works on idiots, but most killers dodge 4 swf or 4x flashlights.This might work for massive idiots, but most killers know how to play around 4 swf or 4x flashlights.
I play around by avoiding them? That counts.
LOL
No, you do things that don't allow them to use the flashlights. You pick up facing away from them or face a wall. You bait pick ups. You slug, et al.
well yeah with the new update since all the killers whined about flashlight saves being op they made it to where you have to start blinding at 1 sec instead of 2 so you have to be right next to the killer when he pick up to flashlight save
It was easy to counter flashlights before the updated pick up animation. People just thought it was easier to moan instead of getting better and doing something different.
Thats the survivors way of life. Why git gud when you can instead complain, project power, review bomb and get what you want anyway without any practising
I'm saying it was easy for killers to avoid flashlights before the new animation, now you have to be utterly brain dead, new, or have made a severe mistake to get blinded and drop a survivor. It was easy to avoid, now it's easier.
The hum face a wall trick required uhh well "GASP" A WALL?!?! who would have thought it . The survivor was at fault here. Now the killer can effectivelly nullify the save tho. Just turn around and done.
-
@PhantomMask20763 said:
He's sexeh that's itNO HES WAIFU.
-
@superspy631 said:
luiHow the ######### did a "camper" kill 2 survivors before you and you only did 4 gens only?
I smell ######### tho
-
@Hexyl said:
Even with that it wont solve the core issue of blood warden and thats simply swfs make the perk trash and the fact its a one time use which basically makes it purpose worthless against a swfs group because they will all just leave or even against survivors that just play immersed for 60 seconds the issue is the perk is just not good.No i make sure to only open a door after the survivor is hooked not before so it has 0% chance of it being triggered and im solo most of the time.
-
@meshugganah said:
the inability to dodge altogether is the part i dislike most. some can, not sure how they do it but it seems to be an all encompassing swath when i attempt dodging.its mostly on the killer's end with bad FPS ######### up the hit registery.
-
Its just an offensive way to say get better in truth. Because Humanity has to have everything to hurt and similar after all.
-
@SpitfireOrMichina said:
The killer lunges are broken and everyone know that. The lunges are totaly not what it should be. I'm asking for BHVR to change/review the killers lunges so we finaly cant get hit through windows and pallets when we've already past them or when we are droping a pallet. This is frustrating and it make people ragequit during the games.What everything but yeet said.
And windows are not walls just like fences.
-
@Swiftblade131 said:
Nope not at all.99% of the time I just leave now.
I used to stick around and go the saves all the time. Then I realized I just get pissed at myself for dying instead of leaving.
I think a lot of survivors make this mistake as well, then they claim its hard to pip up or yell at the killers for camping and other things end game. When if they just leave, it really isn't a big deal :chuffed:
That is what I have learned. Plus when I am killer, I prefer the survivors leave quickly, so I can get onto the next match.
I had many times where i used to save and kill myself and the unhooked guy in the process too. Not anymore .
-
@Denson381 said:
I'm deciding on if I should buy David King or not. Is he worth it. Has anyone got clutch things done with his perks?He might be free but he is still BAE.
-
@EnititysServant said:
So it says ingame that the event will just last for one more day, even if it got extended from the 21st to the 23rd. I'm afraid that I wont be able to get the Kate outfit anymore
You should keep them. until the 23rd
-
@Abyssionknight said:
People can't know your intent. All they know is that tunneling is oppressive and not fun (and people play games for fun).So when they're tunneled they get upset because their time is being wasted. They don't know if you're intentionally tunneling or not, or if you saw anyone else or not. All they know is that they're being tunneled, it's unfun, and a waste of their time. So they get upset and complain about it.
It's no different than killers complaining about pallet loops or time wasters or anything else. People don't want to experience unfun things, and so they complain. Unlike pallets or time wasters though, tunneling isn't always done intentionally.
And tunneling can back fire really hard too. Looping is on the survivor (or a nurse) to backfire.
-
@cro0w said:
The title says everything, but i wanted to know it because of Lightweight, to know how effective it really is (i heard people say it lasts for 10 seconds, 7 seconds, 5 seconds and so) i just wanted to make sure i know the exact value.
Your running is light and soft, making your tracks harder to follow. Footstep marks stay visible 1/2/3 seconds less than normal.Its either 5 seconds (my opinion) or 7 seconds (also my opinion).
I dont know if there is an actual calculation of the time though. -
@Nickenzie said:
GT_Legend2 said:I’m averaging 18 FPS on console and there is no chance of me even connecting a hit, they just zip right past me. Pair this with toxic survivors, and you got a recipe for a ######### game
Yeah, sometimes my hit doesn't register! I'll hold my attack button but for some reason, I don't lunge! Hmm, idk anymore lol.
I cant handle 360's at all . I attack and miss when other more better FPS killers would register a hit.
-
i can FEEL you guys ( been playing with 5 to 15 fps on PC for 2 years)( i have no monies)). BUT DONT GIVE UP. Giving up is the disaster( or the end or total defeat).
-
@Peanits said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Peanits said:
@Soren said:
@Peanits said:
(I would not recommend doing it just for a shirt. If you're doing it for some cosmetic, you're doing it for the wrong reasons.)Completely forgot about that one. Edgy blue Nea is still best Nea ;p
On a serious note. Someone asked if the forums will be harsher because of some mods behaviour. My question is the opposite: does being a mod prevent you to participate in controversial threads? It might sound silly, but I have the feel I don't see mods that often on steam for example, I know they are active behind the scene, but it's like they censor themselves on purpose to not give a bad impression of their team...
Hasn't stopped me. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
The rule is basically that you gotta' be a good example. You're free to post as you want, but you also need to make sure that you're constructive and civil about it, because you have to lead by example.
Will you guys make a thread or somesuch for when you need new volutary mods? Because i really enjoy DBD and i would like to help a bit (i can't be very active tho because im using an very old PC tho).
When it's time, it will be officially announced.
NICE. cant wait.
-
@powerbats said:
@yeet said:
They're not "smoothing out the transition" at all though, the timing remains the same, the speed is just nerfed
There was something they had commented can't remember where I saw it but they were changing the speed as well as the transition. They also had said they wanted to fix/remove some of the problem areas that ruin it cough barn/cough sac trees etc.
i remember them saying that but after they just said that they wanted to lower the speed boost but keep the same rate at which it triggers though.
-
@Peanits said:
@Soren said:
@Peanits said:
(I would not recommend doing it just for a shirt. If you're doing it for some cosmetic, you're doing it for the wrong reasons.)Completely forgot about that one. Edgy blue Nea is still best Nea ;p
On a serious note. Someone asked if the forums will be harsher because of some mods behaviour. My question is the opposite: does being a mod prevent you to participate in controversial threads? It might sound silly, but I have the feel I don't see mods that often on steam for example, I know they are active behind the scene, but it's like they censor themselves on purpose to not give a bad impression of their team...
Hasn't stopped me. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
The rule is basically that you gotta' be a good example. You're free to post as you want, but you also need to make sure that you're constructive and civil about it, because you have to lead by example.
Will you guys make a thread or somesuch for when you need new volutary mods? Because i really enjoy DBD and i would like to help a bit (i can't be very active tho because im using an very old PC tho).
-
@powerbats said:
@Soren said:
Completely forgot about that one. Edgy blue Nea is still best Nea ;p
On a serious note. Someone asked if the forums will be harsher because of some mods behaviour. My question is the opposite: does being a mod prevent you to participate in controversial threads? It might sound silly, but I have the feel I don't see mods that often on steam for example, I know they are active behind the scene, but it's like they censor themselves on purpose to not give a bad impression of their team...
I don't think mods purposely avoid controversial topics, I know I never did and Steam is a different beast. What I generally did as well as my fellow mods was on controversial threads we acted as parents so to speak. We only stepped in when the children were getting out of hand.As long as they weren't arguing too loudly or hitting each other it was fine.
The same is true for forum discussions, you generally let them run their course and step in when a line or lines get crossed or it get derailed too much. You gently steer it back on course and to a more civilized area (hopefully). IF you can't get it to where it should be or it gets too derailed then you close it with the reason why.
Most of the time people understand and will calm down for a time until the next thread degenerates into aflame war. Then you rinse and repeat as best you can while trying to infuse humour and levity into it. If all else fails then warnings and bans ensue but those are a rarely used last resort reserved for the worst of the worst.
I wish that future modders see this and adopt it in their behaviours.
-
@Vietfox said:
I usually play as a survivor, but when i play as a killer, drop the pallet on me and t-bag afterwards i honestly laugh xD I think survivor's faces and moves are pretty hilarious.
il do that too . but only so many times you know?
-
@powerbats said:
Few things to not copy every post.While those games are symmetrical both teams are not evenly managed since draft or random games you can get unbalanced teams. So when that happens people dodge the lobbies all the time because they don't like the teams. If someone gets their champ picked or banned they'll dodge the lobby as well. Whether it's ranked or unranked this happens.
If PS4 is so toxic then that's something that needs to be handled via either Sony (fat chance unless you wave money in front of them) or BHVR. I do agree there needs to be a way to get Sony and Xbox to change how they run things with the blocking.
Dedicated servers would help big time at least for pc and you could start implementing lobby dodging penalties. No killers won't stop playing here and if they do survivors will swap over for faster queues. I do wonder if dedicated servers would allow console users to bypass Sony and Xbox services beyond login.
That way they wouldn't be able to be blocked from playing against people and wouldn't know until post game lobby. I mean they could still enable chat blocking to popup post game lobby as well as profile blocking for comments.
4.I'll add to this later when my brain gets less foggy from being dehydrated and I'll change this one and add others.
As long as they add a rule that says " you can dodge high pings and SWF groups of any kind i am satisfied.
-
-
I get Tbag and insults in chat. I dont get flaming attempts tho.
-
Exactly.
-
From My experience if i 3 man i will 100 pip. But thats probably because i leave the 3rd survivor on the ground or hook them 3 times if possible too.
What i think happened is that you got gen rushed and used NOED and evil 3 to kill them . And 1 got 1 hooked too.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
How the [BAD WORD] did a forum post about being offend at an animation got this heated?What the actual [BAD WORD]?
dont ask me. Im as calm as a cat sleeping.
-
@meshugganah said:
jiminie said:Snowflake orion alongside paulowhateverhisnameis reporting for duty, give me a break already, go do something else instead of being here 24/7 posting nonsense
that moment when your argument sucks and you must resort to absurd fantasies.Exactly.
-
@jiminie said:
Snowflake orion alongside paulowhateverhisnameis reporting for duty, give me a break already, go do something else instead of being here 24/7 posting nonsenseNo thanks.
-
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
The devs know that the trick is not to punish dodging versus SWF but to make it rewarding playing versus SWF(or at least somewhat fun).That's the trick for everything, but some people are too limited and only think in terms of punishment, even though they know it doesn't work.
Probably. I think they think the devs are policemen/woman who's job is to maintain the law and punish lawbreakers by putting them in jaild tho.
(Game)Devs are essentially creators of fun for the fun of others(and to get lots of money too understandibly). If you force people to engage in unfun activities in game people will leave them . I for one dislike shooters because they are so many copies of the same game and its boring (unfun) AF.
-
@ASpazNamedSteve said:
It's always necessary.no its not. Just like any other sort of negative behaviour.
-
@lyric said:
Orion said:@lyric said:
Well in other competitive games it is that way and they have all kinds of players that consistently play, I’m honestly shocked you’ve never heard of a game doing it before it’s very common actually, I just believe that unless the ping is bad you shouldn’t dodge but that’s just my opinion, I just know I don’t do it but people can all have their own opinions, I just feel like people who dodge items or groups are just cherry picking what they feel is easy to beat.
Which games have punishment for lobby dodging (not DCing, mind the difference)?
League of legends, heroes of the storm, overwatch, and paladins are four I can name right off the top of my head but I’m sure I could find more if I looked
they are all Symetrical games (both teams are equal) so there is a big difference.
The devs know that the trick is not to punish dodging versus SWF but to make it rewarding playing versus SWF(or at least somewhat fun).
-
get behavioured(or similar)
-
@lyric said:
pauloandrade22 said:@lyric said:
Tsulan said:
@lyric said: Tsulan said:
@lyric said: pauloandrade22 said:
@lyric said: Master said:
@pauloandrade22 said: @powerbats said: @ChraizE said: This app is a must for killers! Screw those swf jerks don't let them use coms just so they can make fun of you post match even though they were cheating. Link it to everyone!!! Good grief the whininess is astounding, the decs have said it's not cheating so therefore it's not cheating. Now before you say anything killers use the devs said camping is a legit strat to defend it. So if the devs have said it's ok it is and therefore isn't cheating. But go ahead and use a software that isn't allowed and get that ban, I'm sure you'll feel so much better having to use that. Instead of doing the same as @Master and dodging on his own if he wants. It gets tiring after the 5th time of checking the profiles and then leaving. If i did not want to throw 40€ worth of content i would use MLGA. But not this new application. who knows what viruses and similar it has. You dont need to check profiles, I dont do that anymore. Just dodge the lobby if too many survivors join at the same time, sure it might hurt some solo guys if they are unlucky and join at the same time, but as long as devs refuse to highlight SWF players, thats not my fault
Why should they? They said they want the game centered around that type of play, I totally can’t wait for them to implement punishments for lobby dodging good ping. Killers will sit here and complain about veteran survivor players going against noobs but will lobby dodge and cherry pick a lobby with no items, no prestige, and nobody at all joining together. It’s really a load of garbage that if I put on prestige clothing with a flashlight I might as well not even look for a game unless I last second switch and then they’re gonna dc anyways. Anyone who’s good at this game doesn’t need to dodge anyone and it’s laughable people still make excuses after the devs already stated this is the way they want it. So anyone who is good at being Ebullied will play with you? . Nice try but we are adults and we undestand the common social pressure tactics. So get dodged more. Its for the best.
So adults cry about playing with a group and dodge because they can’t beat who’s in front of them? Even when the developers want it played that way and said it on a live stream recently I guess to you that’s still a problem Devs want the survivors to bully the killers? That´s a bold statement to say the least.
No they want the game centered around SWF team style play and you know that’s what I meant and anyone who watches the streams know The devs gave in to survivors lobby dodging, so they could play with their friends. Thus creating SWF. They created a monster and don´t know how to balance it. SWF makes it incredible easy to coordinate around the killer and effectivly bully him. Now over 70% of all matches contain SWF (probably way more, since they haven´t released any new data). Devs struggle to balance the game around SWF. So they started to give all survivors more information. Like those icons that tell you that NOED is active. Or Huntress Lullaby. Those things were meant to give solo survivors the same information as SWF teams. But in doing so, they made the game way easier for survivors. Since you don´t need to pay attention anymore. You just look at what warning icons are active and play accordingly. This was a huge mistake. Now they want to give all survivors inbuild Kindred. This will be a huge thing. Since solo survivors will not only be as coordinated as SWF, but SWF will also have a better control about who is closest to unhook. It will result it gen rushs. Since survivors won´t leave the gen to check the hook. SWF has been OP since forever. Now giving all survivors the power of SWF won´t exactly make the life of killers easier. Only the life of survivors. Which hasn´t been exactly hard to begin with. This game is tagged as a HORROR game, but it has more in common with the NASCAR simulator than with a Horror game or movie.
I agree with most of what you said, my point is that the devs have now geared towards THIS direction and that’s what they’ve announced live to everyone, I’m just saying if or when they do get dedicated servers I can’t wait for them to implement time bans on lobby dodgers, people on here are condoning it and it happens to me high ranked solo playing all the time because they assume swf and don’t know for sure so I end up waiting forever for a match at times only to start right over , if this is part of the game and the direction they are going in , then lobby dodging a good ping shouldn’t be an option and I’ve played solo majority of my time anyway it feels more real like it’s intended in my personal preference , my problem is I feel like I do worse in swf because I’m overly altruistic in situations I should go away in, like camping for example, if you get a good killer who decides to hard camp because bbq didn’t light up if you were for some reason just already in the area when the hook happens , the best option is to do gens , but if I’m with my friends I’m having fun and I run borrowed time and we’ll make it together anyway so I’ll go for it and laugh if I go down, I’m not gonna let it ruin my day because I made a bad choice, I’m here to have fun win or lose.
If and when( it wont) happens many killers will just play survivor or leave the game entirelly. You'd kill the game with that.
So you think preventing lobby dodging would kill the game?
i think so yeah. I at least would never play killer again.
-
@Master said:
Git gud
Break the pallet
Just pressure the gens
Just run in circles
gg ez
Pretty good job so farJust to name a few
Killers can loop too.
-
Yes
-
@Might_Oakk said:
This could make the perk alot more useful imo.No
-
@lyric said:
Tsulan said:@lyric said:
Tsulan said:
@lyric said: pauloandrade22 said:
@lyric said: Master said:
@pauloandrade22 said: @powerbats said: @ChraizE said: This app is a must for killers! Screw those swf jerks don't let them use coms just so they can make fun of you post match even though they were cheating. Link it to everyone!!! Good grief the whininess is astounding, the decs have said it's not cheating so therefore it's not cheating. Now before you say anything killers use the devs said camping is a legit strat to defend it. So if the devs have said it's ok it is and therefore isn't cheating. But go ahead and use a software that isn't allowed and get that ban, I'm sure you'll feel so much better having to use that. Instead of doing the same as @Master and dodging on his own if he wants. It gets tiring after the 5th time of checking the profiles and then leaving. If i did not want to throw 40€ worth of content i would use MLGA. But not this new application. who knows what viruses and similar it has. You dont need to check profiles, I dont do that anymore. Just dodge the lobby if too many survivors join at the same time, sure it might hurt some solo guys if they are unlucky and join at the same time, but as long as devs refuse to highlight SWF players, thats not my fault
Why should they? They said they want the game centered around that type of play, I totally can’t wait for them to implement punishments for lobby dodging good ping. Killers will sit here and complain about veteran survivor players going against noobs but will lobby dodge and cherry pick a lobby with no items, no prestige, and nobody at all joining together. It’s really a load of garbage that if I put on prestige clothing with a flashlight I might as well not even look for a game unless I last second switch and then they’re gonna dc anyways. Anyone who’s good at this game doesn’t need to dodge anyone and it’s laughable people still make excuses after the devs already stated this is the way they want it. So anyone who is good at being Ebullied will play with you? . Nice try but we are adults and we undestand the common social pressure tactics. So get dodged more. Its for the best.
So adults cry about playing with a group and dodge because they can’t beat who’s in front of them? Even when the developers want it played that way and said it on a live stream recently I guess to you that’s still a problem Devs want the survivors to bully the killers? That´s a bold statement to say the least.
No they want the game centered around SWF team style play and you know that’s what I meant and anyone who watches the streams know
The devs gave in to survivors lobby dodging, so they could play with their friends. Thus creating SWF.
They created a monster and don´t know how to balance it. SWF makes it incredible easy to coordinate around the killer and effectivly bully him.
Now over 70% of all matches contain SWF (probably way more, since they haven´t released any new data).
Devs struggle to balance the game around SWF. So they started to give all survivors more information. Like those icons that tell you that NOED is active. Or Huntress Lullaby. Those things were meant to give solo survivors the same information as SWF teams. But in doing so, they made the game way easier for survivors. Since you don´t need to pay attention anymore. You just look at what warning icons are active and play accordingly. This was a huge mistake.
Now they want to give all survivors inbuild Kindred. This will be a huge thing. Since solo survivors will not only be as coordinated as SWF, but SWF will also have a better control about who is closest to unhook. It will result it gen rushs. Since survivors won´t leave the gen to check the hook.
SWF has been OP since forever. Now giving all survivors the power of SWF won´t exactly make the life of killers easier. Only the life of survivors. Which hasn´t been exactly hard to begin with.
This game is tagged as a HORROR game, but it has more in common with the NASCAR simulator than with a Horror game or movie.
I agree with most of what you said, my point is that the devs have now geared towards THIS direction and that’s what they’ve announced live to everyone, I’m just saying if or when they do get dedicated servers I can’t wait for them to implement time bans on lobby dodgers, people on here are condoning it and it happens to me high ranked solo playing all the time because they assume swf and don’t know for sure so I end up waiting forever for a match at times only to start right over , if this is part of the game and the direction they are going in , then lobby dodging a good ping shouldn’t be an option and I’ve played solo majority of my time anyway it feels more real like it’s intended in my personal preference , my problem is I feel like I do worse in swf because I’m overly altruistic in situations I should go away in, like camping for example, if you get a good killer who decides to hard camp because bbq didn’t light up if you were for some reason just already in the area when the hook happens , the best option is to do gens , but if I’m with my friends I’m having fun and I run borrowed time and we’ll make it together anyway so I’ll go for it and laugh if I go down, I’m not gonna let it ruin my day because I made a bad choice, I’m here to have fun win or lose.
If and when( it wont) happens many killers will just play survivor or leave the game entirelly. You'd kill the game with that.
-
@Master said:
@fluffybunny said:
@Master said:
@fluffybunny said:
@Master said:
@fluffybunny said:
@Orion said:
@fluffybunny said:
@Orion said:
@fluffybunny said:
Something should be done about face camping, but this idea can probably be exploited or come off too strong. Honestly, if you affect their points and their pips, they'd probably slow down on the camps.Also, camping is a weak and boring strat (tunneling is quite dumb, too). I think killers should get like style points (towards blood points and pips) for how they kill. Like they lose points if the method is easy (e.i. face camps, tunnels) and gain points for switching targets and not going back immediately. Camping really does ruin it for one side, though, and most of the time it isn't even deserved. It should be an active decision to punish at a cost rather than just be the easy way out. Also, more game modes would be fun. w
TL;DR version - "Killers playing efficiently is boring, and they should be punished for it."
10/10 Survivor logic right there. When can Survivors start being punished for working on generators that have already been partially repaired?
TL;DR - "Killers camping is lazy and you should get additional points for not afking in front of someone or for changing it up"
Didn't know people needed a tl;dr for a paragraph, but there you go. When I play killer, I don't camp or tunnel. It's more fun that way tbh. That way I don't feel like I'm targeting one person.
No, you literally said Killers should be punished for not playing how you believe is fun.
Just for the record, in case you didn't realize, this is a PvP game. The Killer is not there to amuse you; he's the opposing team.
Just for the record, in case you didn't realize, this is a PvP game. Meaning, you're not playing against robots. You cheat, it's wrong, right? Tunneling and camping makes the game an awful experience for everyone but the killer evidently. I personally find it boring, but you seem to like it. It sucks for survivors, though. Have some empathy. Survivors have the right to want to have fun in a game they've payed to play, too. Like I've said in other posts, I would be up for killers getting a massive buff if they could stop the camping and the tunneling. Make it viable to go after the healthy one, rather than the hurt one. Maybe patrol the gens instead of the one on the hook. Make the gens naturally go slower if the killer is nearby or something. This game takes both survivors and killers and just because you find it "fun" doesn't mean it's correct or "fun" for everyone. I'm sure the toxic survivors who say stuff like "EZ" and cuss you out for being bad or make fun of you also finds that fun, but that's not very nice. I'm sure the people who cheat also find that fun, but that isn't right.
I play survivor too. I am fine being camped because I know that my team can escape then
Only tunneling feels bad, but well.As killer I wont tunnel survivors if the survivors dont tunnel gens. Thats only a fair compromise, do you agree?
If survivors tunnel gens however, they dont leave me enough time to 2 hook everyone before I start killing, so I switch my game strategy to tunneling in order to become more time efficientI'm fine with camping on certain conditions. Otherwise, it annoys me. I dislike when it happens at the start of the match or before I get much points. I understand when it happens if someone's being toxic and they're camping for that, that's fine. The issue is that camping is quite easy and even rewarding. You may need to find someone first, but you can basically just afk around them and someone is likely going to try to go for the save. They want their points and their friend off the hook.
I don't mean to be rude, but is English your second language? I believe you mean to say "survivors rush gens" not tunnel. I can understand that sentiment and something should be done to make the process a bit more complex. Like, maybe having to fetch something for the generator, too. Gen rushing typically happens because of a lack of pressure on the field, but there's bound to be some off while you're chasing. If one doesn't camp, they'll switch targets to someone else and that's three people doing something else (assuming someone's going for the save). If you don't tunnel, you'll hopefully just get the current person you're chasing down. If you happen to run into the other person again, I don't really think that's tunneling unless you actually go out looking for them. I think that's kinda hard to say it happened for sure, though.
Yes english isnt my mother tongue, but I dare to say that im quite confident using it
Doesnt matter how you call it, genrush or tunneling gens (what does that have to do with english btw?)Look at it analytically:
As killer it is called tunneling when you proceed completing your objective on a single survivor, after the first hook this survivor is at 33% dead, after 2nd hook 66% dead. It is for some reason considered toxic to tunnel, i.e. playing efficiently by completing your objective in a time efficient way.Now compare that to survivor
If you have repaired a gen to 66%, would you change your gen now or would you complete the 66% gen?
Because if you complete the 66%gen, then you are tunneling gens.Thats literally using the definition of tunneling brought up by survivors.
As I said, non-tunneling survivors give me enough time not to tunnel them too.And I would like to challenge you to explain me how a killer can be more effective by not tunneling, its literall common sense to do that.
And regarding the killers that do well without tunneling/camping, I challenge you to show them to me, and ofc they have to be high ranks, non-nurses and play against a competent team of survivors.
I said it was impressive to know multiple languages and understandable for such mistakes. When people use tunneling, they're referring to following around one person and keeping them from playing the game as normal. It's running after the person and not giving them a rest. Coming back for them if they were unhooked, etc. Gen rushing is when survivors sit on the gens without being disturbed or with nice boxes and get the gens done quickly. It's a funny image to think of a survivor running after a gen, though. #survivorkiller
Your analogy doesn't work. It's more similar to hooks. You aren't tunneling a hook by using it over and over. It's smart to go after the nearest hook. It isn't smart to tunnel one person as that is leaving three people with only gens to do. It's PvP and both having a good experience without feeling bullied or targeted is important.
As for the common sense of tunneling, you're leaving 2 people on the gen, 1 person on the hook, and 1 person going for the save. Unless you are not talking about tunneling in that regard. What I'm talking about is targetting a player straight off the hook and not giving them a break or following someone as gens pop around you. Sometimes people have a good rhythm in the area and it could be beneficial to give it a break to bug other people.
I said Monto and Puppers do quite well. I've also gone after many higher ranks that don't need to camp/tunnel to get everyone or to get a win. 3 out of 4 is still good. That's still a loss for survivors.
I think that's what I said, but I forgot.
Is monto that youtuber or do you mean some streamer? Obivously I can put up youtube videos where I have a 100% winrate at rank 1 too, so not gonna bother with checking that channel tbh
Just checked puppers out, started the stream from 3 days ago, and zipped through it till I found his first killer. It was a huntress, 5 second into the game he explains how to camp as huntress, while he stansd 20-30 meter away from the hook spaming axes at the hooked guy.Sure, they might have been toxic or sth, so I decided to watch the whole match in order to not judge from a 5 sec impression
I like how it starts, he says he actually has to pay attention now because he isnt playing survivor now, sympathic guy I have to say
After 2 minutes it becomes clear that the survivors he verses are quite bad, they dont even know hwo to crouch behind a pallet, he also said he hasnt played killer for a week, wonder what rank he is now.
Next survivor simply walks up to him and suicides, mhm ok I guess I can skip that match.... mhm ok rank 10Checked out another 5 streams (taking into accoutn the 1 week break from killer), he only played survivor.
So this is your example for killers that do quite well without camping and tunneling? Did I check out the wrong channel?
Please provide a link to high rank killergameplay of him playing against decent,coordinated survivors.
From what I have seen he is more a chilled dude and he wouldnt stand a change against a decent SWF, but please prove me wrongThats why i like Panda and true a lot more than those dudes.
-
@SnakeSound222 said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@SnakeSound222 said:
When a Survivor disconnects or doesn't load into a match, the Killer should not lose out on their BBQ stack. It is really stupid that Survivors can deny you at least 25% extra BP just because you managed to down them. This is something that should've been caught and fixed before the perk was released.then its a guarranteed 100% BP in every game for example. Dont get me wrong that idea is fantastic but i wonder how it could be abused (by making the survivors DC intentionally for example).
If you're talking about Survivors DC'ing right when the game starts, the Killer won't get that much BP (maybe around 12k) and the Survivors will eventually get banned.
If you're talking about a Killer intentionally trying to force the Survivors to DC, then that might just be an unfortunate side effect.
yeah probably.
-
@Nancy_ThompsonDbd said:
Chucky has been one of the most iconic characters in horror movies of the 80s, such as Freddy, Letherface and Myers, will one day be in the game? would create a new concept of killer, to be small, could see the survivors crouched trying to bodyblock on the hook, and instead of catching the survivors of the ground, could drag them, and throw them to the hook. this could be funny and have different skills, for example that their power is jumping over the survivors, and that a skillcheck appears, if they fail, they fall into dying state, if they hit it, they throw chucky away, and they get hurt.It could be very fun! Friends til the end!
Please @not_Queen , Answer me
We will by the end probably see most if not every licensed killer in the history of killers in DBD execpt for Jason due to that (suiciding) lawsuit.
-
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Orion said:
No way to PM, as far as I know.That sucks oh well.
Also would surgery permanently cure myopia or would i develop it again?
There's a chance you'd get it again, if your eye had not completely finished its development. Regardless, old people naturally have to wear glasses because their eyesight degrades over time.
AH thanks Again. Now i know to ask when i have ocular questions and problems.
-
@whythisforumnotsteam said:
Is it because of the lack of players? I've been waiting for like 15minutes and restarted the game once. Not even a single person has joined the lobby. I can join a lobby as survivor and there are sure enough players. Few months ago it didnt even take 2 minutes to fill a lobby.
THanksIts a matchmaker issue as far as im aware.
-
@Denson381 said:
I'm deciding on if I should buy David King or not. Is he worth it. Has anyone got clutch things done with his perks?DAVID IS BEST WAIFUU.
His perks are great. One for Points, other for prolonging loops, The final one is for (personal opinion) stealth and (general opinion) challange yourself to become a better survivor.
-
@Orion said:
No way to PM, as far as I know.That sucks oh well.
Also would surgery permanently cure myopia or would i develop it again?
-
@Nickenzie said:
pauloandrade22 said:YES THAT IT. I forgot the name.
Yeah, that would be the perfect addition to blindness! Any auras revealed in the darkness would not be revealed to you as well! Great idea @pauloandrade22!
Yea but i mean the whole extreme darkness part of mind's eye without the aura reading at all. Just like 4 meter vision sight or similar. And it nulls both the red stain and the terror radius BUT you keep the heartbeat so its not super broken (a skilled player will be able to still loop due to 6 meter sight range and map knowledge.)
-
or its like no way jose?.
Also thanks for deleting it.
-
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Orion said:
@AmorePrincess said:
Oh, I do. And I normally play 10 hours a day, after work, more on weekends, even gave me glasses eventually because of it. Paying the price for being a gamer, haha. But it has been worse now, when you play killer alot. But it might be different depending on the person.Yes, because glasses aren't due to congenital defects in the eyes or the development of the eyes; it's because of bad FPS.
Im have myopia due to being too close to the TV for so long in my childhood. Now its premanet unless i do surgery ( and i probably wont too scared to get permanent blindness from that). Its not impossible to become like that due to FPS either.
Bullshit you do. I've studied what causes myopia, as well as several other visual abnormalities, and "sitting too close to the TV" was not a cause.
Thats odd. Thats literally what made my like that . Even the doctor said that.
My problem is that i see well a close range ( 5 ish meters) but anything else its blurry AF. is that myopia by the way? Im not a native english speaker.
Visual abnormalities are caused by a deformity in one or more of the many pieces that compose the human optical system (I don't know their names in English nor care enough to find out) and are usually congenital, meaning you were born with them. The day "sitting too close to the TV" causes a physical defect in the eyes is the day that TV model needs to be abolished.
EDIT: And yes, that's myopia.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. Thats cool to know. Thank you very much. Now i know more.
Come to think of it, judging from your name, you and I speak the same language.
Maybe. Or maybe not. ( im not that worried that peps know what country i am from tho)
Then again, I do speak a multitude of languages. I'm assuming you're from a country that speaks Portuguese, yes?
i Pm'ed (as well as the forum allows it) the answer.
I speak english, spanish ,protuguese, and a little bit of french (i understand french more than speak by the way).
Yup, me too (regarding your "PM", which is actually a public comment I've deleted).
Ok . can you PM in these forums?