pauloandrade22
pauloandrade22
About
- Username
- pauloandrade22
- Joined
- Visits
- 45
- Last Active
Comments
-
@Grey87 said:
It's not a problem though.
You can easily avoid it. If they all don't ready up till it's like ~10sec left then just dodge.Or Neo facecamp them . I prefer dodging though.
-
@Master said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Jack11803 said:
@Master said:
@thekiller490490 said:
Both killer dodging and survivor quick switch should be stopped. What I think would work is for killers once they enter a lobby they can't leave. When survivors enter they can't leave either and they are stuck with whatever build they have. The killer doesn't get a build lock as it lets them prepare for what the survivors are bringing in. 4 flashlights? Lightborn, toolboxes? Two anti gen perks. DoneThen we would need to have a ping filter though
Also a SWF filter would be necessary or killer will DC ingame as much as survivor currently do and I am not sure whether you want thatThen they should make the DC ban rate actually reasonable, and make it 10 or 5% DC rare. Not the absurd 80%; which no one can reach unless they literally rage quit hundreds of times
Have a counter or something that is visible and at 10 DC they cant play the game for 24 hours BUT have the DC counter reset each day( count ingame DCs for both sides and dont count lobby dodging (for the killer's sanity)) and have it be always be shown no matter what.
So 9 DCs per day are acceptable? I wonder how many games the average player plays per day....
If I would DC 9 times per day..... lolA DC has to lead to instant queue time punishment, it begins smal and will grow if the player keeps DCing. Obviously the DC punishment has to be the same for both sides
Well i belive that the trick is to instead of punishing DC we should make it so that its more rewarding to not DC at all you know?.
Like every 10 times you are in a game without DCing for like 10 mins get a token and at
10 tokens you get 100000k BP. It would reset to 0 when you dc and for every token you did not have (im not sure about this part) you get a day of 25% or more or less BP in whatever side you are playing as. And maybe you can't join the SWF mode for the duration of that penalty. Serial DC's increase the penalty by 25% up to 100% at which point no points( pun intended) for you. The penalty lasts for 10 days when you serial DC( two or more in a row) no matter what.Therefore we are rewarding not DCing instead of just punishing it which i think aint the solution.
-
@Eveline said:
1Handirl said:Even as a survivor.... Rank 1. I feel like I'm versing Rank 5-8 killers that are now rank 1-2.
You forgot the rest. Let me help you.
"I do have a overpowered perk build tho (No DS... that's right... that perk is garbage) that no1 uses that nabs me over a 90% win ratio at rank 1 without exhaustion perks but now with the new patch I'm versing killers I shouldn't be... making the game even easier for me. Even tho I play with one hand I played killer and literally 4 killed 5 games in a row... what is up with this patch?"
Its literally impossible to play killer one handed( and survivor too by the way).
LITERALLY.
(I know it was a copy paste from the OP dont worry)
-
@Esheon said:
pauloandrade22 said:@superspy631 said:
lui
How the [BAD WORD] did a "camper" kill 2 survivors before you and you only did 4 gens only?
I smell ######### tho
Simple.
Survivor 1 is hooked, survivor 2 and 3 hover around the hook while survivor 4 does gens.
Survivor 2 is hooked, survivor 3 hovers around the hook while survivor 4 does gens.
Survivor 3 is hooked, survivor 4 walks around the map looking for hatch.
Survivor 3 dies on the hook, and the only survivor who did the correct thing to counter camping escapes through the hatch.
But then clearly camping worked or am i tripping?
Also aint that the survivor's fault as well?.
-
@GhostrickSpecter said:
Whenever I got at least 1 kill with The Hag, some survivors always getting pissed on me, then call me a Camper, "Gen camper", and even "totem camper" ( but I didn't even face camp)? Or even worse, "You don't deserve to play killer, cuz you're only good at defending, noob..."But that's my strategy! Defending Gens, Hooked Survivors and Totem is how I play The Hag! What do you want her to do if she don't place her traps with that ######### Movement Speed?
Also, I'm the killer! I can play the killer the way I want! And you're not the Devs, so stop making rules for me!!!
...Sorry, just felt a little bit pissed cuz meeting these survivors...
The only rules are literally dont cheat , dont insult in chat(######### or similar), dont hack game files and dont witch hunt. Thats it.
-
C for effort.
-
@BillyIII said:
OP. Why are you starting the witchhunts against innocent people? Harrasment is against the rules. The only toxic person in this conversation is you!Nice attempt.
-
@lyric said:
BACKSTABBER said:@lyric said:
BACKSTABBER said:
It’s a waste of perk slot tbh, if you run the killer around on purpose or are just always the first one found is the only time it’s useful and if for any reason you miss it like against a doctor with unnerving presence, (you don’t really know where it’s gonna pop up and it’s so small that you probably won’t hit the skill check, but may get lucky.) then what? You’re the obsession he may have dying light and you being found first just hurt your team and you at that point because once they find the obsession and injure them , you can guarantee they will tunnel until you are out even if they drop over and over to the hook or swing at exact the same time you hit the d strike and cancel it out completely
strongly disagree is useless since 3 or 4 survs mostly use it in every single match (ranked around 13)
I never use DS but I can agree that at least one or two have DS in every match when playing high ranked , my opinion is it’s a waste of a perk slot while others love it , I would rather have something more useful there
I dont have it purely for moral reasons myself. Il never use such stupidity in my life( unless its well nerfed).
-
@Peasant said:
"How about no?" -
@Visionmaker said:
Orion said:@Visionmaker said:
And they'll simply get dodged if they don't.
One problem exists because of another. They shouldn't be addressed separately.
Killers will just DC with last-second switches or make sure last-second switchers die first and as annoyingly as possible. I'd rather they lobby dodge.
Trying to force people to play games they consider unfun will never work. Survivors need to get over themselves and accept that Killers are not going to play with them if they use things that are unbalanced.
D/Cs are punished and offer BP to the opposing side. Lobby dodging is sanctioned, unlimited, effortless, and onesided.
Killers need to understand that it works both ways. If they take issue with survivors d/cing after seeing a hidden offering or "unbalanced" add ons, then they're hypocrites for dodging survivors with what they "think are unbalanced". Players should be able to use the items they want-and have rightfully earned-without fear of anyone deciding "not to play with them".
"PTSD of the last flashlight squad resurges".
-
@Well_Placed_HexTotem said:
I will tunnel and hard patrol anyone who last second switches, and then when they die first with at most a couple thousand BP scored I will message them asking if the last second swap was worth it. Im yet to have anyone say yes.Gotta fight toxicity with toxicity.
Two wrongs dont make a right. Just saying. I will probably do the same tho.
-
Id like to thank the Survivors that dont flame me for winning or losing and the ones that get chatty and are polite get a big nice SMOOCH from me
. -
@SoylentPixie said:
@AmorePrincess said:
And by the way, camping would be less of a tactic if people stopped trying to earn points and actually kept doing objects. It would not be so rewarding.Very much agree. In the early games i got hugely annoyed with campers. Then i stopped and looked at what my team mates were doing even as i was screaming "HE'S RIGHT BLOODY THERE...GO DO A GEN!!!"
If only more were like you.
-
@Slimette said:
@inkedsoulz my point is WHY does this happen not how >_<And it is an intended mechanic of the windows.
-
@Slimette said:
@inkedsoulz my point is WHY does this happen not how >_<Its to prevent infinites from occuring ( its when a killer is physically unable to catch a survivor no matter what ).
And that is the medium vault. the slow vault is when you silently vault the window.
-
@Tsulan said:
@Vietfox said:
Tsulan said:
Vietfox said:It's kinda easy for a killer to get more BPs than survivors, i guess that's why they dont get to keep the addons nor get them in the match.
Survivor gets only less points if he plays bad.
I usually get between 20 and 30.000 bloodpoints per match as survivor. Without bonus points.So that can't be the reason.
Unless bad players should be given a special treatment. Ohh wait...Survivors get MORE points if killer plays bad, or you meant survivors get less points if THEY play bad?
U usually get between 20k and 30k? Good, but what i said is that the killer usually gets more than survivors, not that survivors get a few BPs.This is simply wrong. I get more points if the killer plays good.
A bad killer won´t get hooks. Meaning no unhook points, no heal points. Survivors and killers get roughly the same amount of BPs per time spend. Not per match, but per time spend. If a survivor performs bad, he can just jump into a new match. Killer has to stay until everyone leaves.Personally if i get big emblems it was a good BP game too (16000 BP more or less).
-
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
Why not instead of punishing DC make it more rewarding not to DC in the match.Like every 10 fully done (either 10 mins of gameplay or until everyone dies/escapes) you get 100000 K BP that get reset when YOU dc ( the tokens would stay the same if the killer DC's though for the survivors or if the killer does not connect in the loading screen for both)
And add a time penalty for like each token you DONT have you get a day with 25% or similar less BP gains. Until the days pass you'd get that plus you cant get more tokens no matter what.
What do you guys think?
Love it. That'd make it great for players who haven't played in a while as well.
Thanks.
-
@Orion said:
@Vietfox said:
Funny you say that, cause i got a degree in history and my job is related to that (not only western history btw).
So no, i'm not ignoring that xD. But compare both situations and times is simply dumb (trying to be as respectful as i can right now) because they are not related at all.
"oh, people used to kill each other in the past, lets do something completely different and cry about petty things" it's not worse but it's not necessary either. Hope you get it now, but something tells me you won't (or won't be willing to understand at least)I get that they were different times, but to say that people now are "too sensitive" when it's objectively better than before is taking a massive ######### on centuries of progress. Unless you live in a shithole like the USA, your chances of being killed just because someone's upset about something you said are virtually zero.
where i live i almost never saw open violence against others ( and if that happens its a quick call of the police and the slammer for the suspect.)
-
Why not instead of punishing DC make it more rewarding not to DC in the match.
Like every 10 fully done (either 10 mins of gameplay or until everyone dies/escapes) you get 100000 K BP that get reset when YOU dc ( the tokens would stay the same if the killer DC's though for the survivors or if the killer does not connect in the loading screen for both)
And add a time penalty for like each token you DONT have you get a day with 25% or similar less BP gains. Until the days pass you'd get that plus you cant get more tokens no matter what.
What do you guys think?
-
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Orion said:
The latter. If some people think other people nowadays are too sensitive, then what do they think of past generations, who literally murdered each other when they were offended?
They still do (unfortunatelly) Its still sad though.
Which just proves my point. People think those who complain about almost anything are "whiners" and "too sensitive", and decry it as "nowadays, people are too sensitive". Fact is, people have always been this sensitive, and even used to murder each other when they were offended.
Given the alternative, I'll take the whiners, thank you. At least they aren't so sensitive that they feel the need to kill whomever offended them.
Oh yeah that is true. Im not easilly offended mind you( i get more offended from people i know than random strangers personally). If a stranger is rude i just dismiss and/or ignore them. If its just disagreeaments tho im perfectly calm and fine though.
-
@Orion said:
The latter. If some people think other people nowadays are too sensitive, then what do they think of past generations, who literally murdered each other when they were offended?
They still do (unfortunatelly) Its still sad though.
-
@Vietfox said:
Tsulan said:
Vietfox said:It's kinda easy for a killer to get more BPs than survivors, i guess that's why they dont get to keep the addons nor get them in the match.
Survivor gets only less points if he plays bad.
I usually get between 20 and 30.000 bloodpoints per match as survivor. Without bonus points.So that can't be the reason.
Unless bad players should be given a special treatment. Ohh wait...Survivors get MORE points if killer plays bad, or you meant survivors get less points if THEY play bad?
U usually get between 20k and 30k? Good, but what i said is that the killer usually gets more than survivors, not that survivors get a few BPs.I think that the 3 man should be considered the killer's win and he/she should retain their add-ons (maybe not the ultra rares??????).
-
@Might_Oakk said:
@powerbats said:
@Might_Oakk said:
@Master said:
@Thatbrownmonster said:
they allready banned him once and you saw how reviews looked the same day soo yeaalso no ban feature in playstation soo yea
Of course you can get banned on playstation
Nope. Devs haven't added it to console yet. NotQueen said they want to add them but no eta.
While BHVR can't Sony can if they get enough complaints to where they have to act.
Lol they have nothing todo with policing individual games!! You think Sony has people with an intimate understanding of DbD and every other game where they sift through reports? Are you on the pipe?
LOL.
-
@Vietfox said:
Orion said:@Vietfox said:
I know it's 2018 and people are so sensitive nowadays, but we need to put some limits on what's actually harmful.
Yeah, it was way better in the past, where people killed each other when they were offended.
Ok, from now on i'm gonna stop taking you seriously (not that i was before tbh) if you are really gonna come around with that comparison.
DAMM Savage.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
Can we agree that if a killer is better than the survivor the killer should have a big chance to get them at least?Of course they should.
THANK YOU. because thats the unfair part of the game. Being better than the survivor but they won(escape) because planks or certain stalling places or DS BS( the worst one)
-
Can we agree that if a killer is better than the survivor the killer should have a big chance to get them at least?
-
Im not sure whether to be sad or agreeing with you.
-
@chemical_reject said:
Nickenzie said:
chemical_reject said:
It's never my intent to "hurt". It's not my fault people get so fragile over everything.I know but you know, try and be kind! Sugar is often underrated!
I will be kind when kindness is due but otherwise u can refer to my "kid gloves" comment.
Same but i wont resort to lower myself to the same level of an insulter.
-
@fcc2014 said:
@chemical_reject said:
I will be kind when kindness is due but otherwise u can refer to my "kid gloves" comment.
You are a far better man than me. I'm not going to baby anyone. If you can't take a little criticism about your opinion maybe don't share it. If you are too sensitive and someone may make you feel bad.. We are all still talking about a forum for a video game we all play correct?
yeah . I just ask that a person be respectfull to me and i will be to them (if i was not respectfull the first time ASSUME IT was an accidental part in my case please).
I DONT CARE WHAT SIDE OF A GAME YOU PLAY EITHER (sorry for caps).
-
@Mc_Harty said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
In all fairness all killers should be like the nurse in the sense that once she sees you you are ######### and you'd need to use mindgames and cleverness to outwit them.I would much rather them be like Billy, then the Nurse tbh and for the developers to fix the maps.
Fair enough( pun intended).
I just dislike stalling and DS BS. The rest is fine as is. If i lose it was not due to stalling or DS it was because they were better than me.
-
@thesuicidefox said:
@Mister_Holdout said:
@thesuicidefox said:
@Mister_Holdout said:
Do you have any plans to start using perks that are actually useful?And, is that console or are you just using a controller?
I play the game on Xbox. And my build is very useful. Case and point > http://xboxclips.com/thesuicidefox/46d027be-a193-4259-9c26-b43c4d8c5744
That was the 4th time I did this to this killer, it should have been 3 but he left me slugged one time and I got up. He was camping hooks super hard, so I did this to him. He got me, but I play to die so what (still pipped), but because of this everyone else got out. I was tapping gens around the map and 2 popped about 40 seconds after I died here and then they escaped. I can make those saves that are impossible and force the killer to take my hook because he can't slug me like a normal survivor. He has to hook me, and when I don't struggle he takes me far away for BBQ/event hook, my team finishes gens and leaves.
Dude, I didn't know you played on Xbox.
PC is an entirely different beast. I should know, I have 1000 hours on console.
And I'm telling you, things are different. This build of yours won't hold up on PC. The killers are much better.
Not trying to be mean or anything, that's just my observation. No Mither is not a very good perk on PC.
You don't understand what I'm doing though. I can make saves other players can't. I can force the killer to come get me. If you are an obsession I can take hits for you to save pallets/DS. Now the killer here wasn't very good. I have no doubt killers on PC are better, but when I'm playing to ensure my team survives it works as long as my teammates don't make mistake they get out. This guy wasn't a very good killer, evidenced by the fact of what his strategy was (camp/tunnel someone from the start of the game with LF). But I can do this to good killers and still pip, and give lots of chances to other survivors in the trial to stay alive.
The problem is survivors put on NM and play to escape. That's not how you use NM. You have to play like you are definitely going to die so you should do everything you can to make sure your team stays up. Does it work every game? No but I will usually still safety pip at least. It works you just have to not play like a normal survivor and try to escape. You have to play like a NM survivor and play like you are going to die any second.
I've also done stuff like get on a killers totem as they chase the obsession around it. I make them come pull me off, and because of Resil I do the totem faster than normal. If they ignore me their totem is gone, if they hit me or grab me they have to take my hook. They can't slug me, I will literally sit at that totem and get up until either it's gone or the killer takes my hook. When they do, the obsession takes the totem. It's lose-lose for the killer. If they slug me they will have to come back there EVERY time I get up, and I won't get up until I see them chase someone else or I know they are far away. I'll sit at 99% if they want to camp me slugged and their totem, but now the others can just gen rush. I force the killer to exchange a hook for a totem or lose the game because they wasted WAY too much time on me. Normal survivors can't exactly do that because they play to escape, so when the killer approaches them on a totem they don't want to take a hook because they aren't injured. But for NM guy, it doesn't matter, I'm dead anyway.
If i use no mither its for extra challange and to survive with it if i can. Not to intentionally die though.
-
@Crazewtboy said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
Dont be an ######### to me and i wont be one to you in my definition of not being one of course( and within the game's rules).Also camping the special gens makes tactical sense as they are a special objective for the survivors . Saboing just special hooks is dumb though.
Camping the special gens is just being an ######### though. You sound like a really typical killer main (no offense) by saying it is stupid for them to sabo only special hooks to stop you from getting your objective but it isn't for you to camp their gens and stop them from getting their objective. We should let each other get the objectives if they are skilled enough. Sure you should put pressure on them, but commit to a chase and don't prioritze the gens when you need the hooks. Camping the gen gets you no where against good survivors because they will just do a different one and suprise, you lost the game
I never said anything about hooks( you can say it also makes sense to sabo them to save a teammate or similar).
-
@Mc_Harty said:
@Orion said:
Nope. In DbD, if a Survivor and Killer of comparable skill and knowledge go up against each other, the only way the Killer wins is if the Survivor makes mistakes. This is well known to be true, but some will deny it vehemently. It's also a major problem with game balance....I meant whenever or not they rage at campers...
Not about skill or winning.
In all fairness all killers should be like the nurse in the sense that once she sees you you are ######### and you'd need to use mindgames and cleverness to outwit them.
-
@Orion said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Orion said:
@Mc_Harty said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
fair as in fair to win(not bullshit games where you only win if they want you to).Which is about as subjective as a survivors opinion on camping.
Nope. In DbD, if a Survivor and Killer of comparable skill and knowledge go up against each other, the only way the Killer wins is if the Survivor makes mistakes. This is well known to be true, but some will deny it vehemently. It's also a major problem with game balance.
unless its nurse.
The Nurse is only good because Survivors refuse to use her counters and treat her like any other Killer. Against Survivors who know what they're doing, she's as weak as any other Killer.
The problem is that gen repairing is too short at the moment. And DS(kill it). And stalling.
-
@Orion said:
@Mc_Harty said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
fair as in fair to win(not bullshit games where you only win if they want you to).Which is about as subjective as a survivors opinion on camping.
Nope. In DbD, if a Survivor and Killer of comparable skill and knowledge go up against each other, the only way the Killer wins is if the Survivor makes mistakes. This is well known to be true, but some will deny it vehemently. It's also a major problem with game balance.
unless its nurse.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
fair as in fair to win(not bullshit games where you only win if they want you to).Which is about as subjective as a survivors opinion on camping.
At least the gen rushing one can't be subjective logically (gens in 7/6 or less mins (and im being fair with the minutes too)).
-
@Chrona said:
By "trash list" I mean "######### list" but I don't know if that'll get "bad worded."People you've played with and went "nope, I will never play with you again," and you'll hard lobby dodge?
After some specific encounters, I started the list, either people that were toxic, extremely good (hey, if you're that good, you shouldn't be rank 15. If you have the right to depip, I have the right to remember your name and choose to not play with you), or just asses.
For example, last game! I won't name names, as much as I want to, but I was playing hillbilly on one of the steel factory maps. I burnt an invite, and so did one survivor. I already have the chops and everything, I'm just burning them for the extra bloodpoints. I mean, 5.5k is quite a bit for a single hook.
Anyways, game starts as usual. Me running into walls, occasionally hitting people, the works (I don't play hillbilly often. His controls feel weird to me). Then I get an audio notification. It isn't near any thing, odd. I go over there, and a claudette with a toolbox is walking away from my event hook. I'm relatively pissed off, chase her down, and pick her up. I see one event hook nearby is already broken, and I take her back to the one she failed a skillcheck on, and throw her on it, and proceed to camp until she dies, ignoring the baiting of her friends that come to try and save her. She's dead. (I do hit her several times and then chainsaw sprint into her. Partly for points, and partly because I'm fairly peeved). No one that directly attacks my bloodpoints is going to remain in my game if I have any input. (Spoiler, as the killer carrying a downed survivor, I do.) After she dies, game continues like normal, and afterwards they abuse me for facecamping. As if I was the instigator, and it wasn't a natural conclusion of their actions.
Yes, this is a rant because I'm frustrated with some people. But question remains: like me adding these names to my list, do you have a list of people you refuse to play with again?
I do have a very long memory for really hard griefers and toxic people too. Not a list per se tho.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
SovererignKing said:You must be joking...Well known for using voice chat with Survivors? Are you talking about Kill Your Friends? What exactly does that have to do with SWF? The developers could implement voice chat in game for Kill Your Friends Mode.
Omg, you're an actual idiot.
Killers can't use SWF. That was the whole point of my statement. I was mocking you for thinking I was survivor main.
And no the devs won't put voice chat in the game. Just like they won't nerf SWF specifically.
Jesus Christ, when you try to argue against a point mocking you for making assumptions. SovererignKing said:
For the love of... YOU SAID IT. “If you’re just dodging for easy matches, it’s not justified” Who the ruddy hell said it was going to be easy going up against 4 random players? Those randoms could very well stomp a Killer. Easy, hard, it doesn’t matter. SWF provides an advantage, even without voice comms, that the game was not designed or balanced around. Period. Now tell me, what’s your justification for gaining an advantage over your opponent, simply because you clicked SWF and not play solo? What’s your justification for using voice comms? Right, you have none, for either. You should NOT be getting an advantage over the opponent simply because you clicked SWF, and not play solo.
Yeah I did say that if you're dodging for easy matches you're not justified for doing it. I said that SWF is in the game for two years now and the developers haven't done any nerfs to that group specifically.
I never said you can't dodge or that SWF is easier then solos. You said you dodge against SWF team because you find it too hard.
So, I ask ######### are you even doing? I never made any argument about survivors being justified at all in their matches. Like what in the actual [BAD WORD] is this paragraph? SovererignKing said:
Here’s a tip : You should proof read what you type before you post. If I’m not justified in dodging lobbies for “easier games”, then you’re not justified playing SWF for “easier games” either. “Just deal with it” is basically you saying “Look, SWF gives the Survivors advantages that the game was not balanced or designed around. Deal with it.” Yeah, cause that’s what I want to play. An unbalanced and unfair game that’s stacked against me more than it’s supposed to be... because Survivor players clicked on a game mode.
SO WHAT THE [BAD WORD] IS THE POINT OF THOSE REPLIES.
You agree with me that killers aren't justified to dodge lobbies for easy wins. And yet I don't know how to proof-read?
“Just deal with it” is basically you saying “Look, SWF gives the Survivors advantages that the game was not balanced or designed around. Deal with it.”
Yeah because that's what I said...
I never said deal with it because it's fair, but because it's part of the game for two [BAD WORD] years. I said don't be surprised if they don't do any nerfs to SWF. Like how they haven't done for nerfs for them for two years.
But please continue this is funny as #########. SovererignKing said:
Whitelisted doesn’t matter. It still provides an advantage the game was not designed for. Doesn’t mean I can’t lobby for the developers to place restrictions on SWF groups that make the game harder (like for instance and extra 20 seconds per Gen), that makes it fair.
Again, who do you think you arguing against?
I never said that SWF are not at an advantage. I said killers aren't justified to dodge matches for easy wins.
Also it's cute that you think programs that have an affect on the game being white listed doesn't matter. Of course they do. Considering an application called Curse Voice (a voice chat program) is allowed for support for Dead By Daylight, you have no justification to dodge SWF simply because they talk to each other.
Sucks I know.
Link in case you don't believe me.
https://www.easy.ac/en-us/support/dbd/guides/whitelist/ SovererignKing said:Seems to me that I’m the one who “hit a nerve” here What with all the “[BAD WORD]”’s your dropping left and right.
I'm Australian.
We call our friends ######### just for saying hello.
What's your excuse for flipping out over my first reply? SovererignKing said:
Lobby dodging because your opponent(s) have an unfair advantage from the get go is justification. How would you like it if we played Tekken or some other fighting game, and if your opponent so choices to “just hit a button” it automatically forces a handicap match on you? If you win, congratulations, you get the same reward you would have gotten if your opponent didn’t hit that button. Oh, if you lose, you get the same punishment as well. Little bit infuriating to lose Rank and the such because you got stuck in a handicap match you had no say so over, huh? How would you like it if I could just pick “Easy Mode” as Killer, and all Survivors automatically had the No Mither effect applied? Sound fun?
No, it's [BAD WORD] entitlement. It's not justified at all.
Considering that a fighting game and an asymmetrical game about slashers have nothing in common with each other, I'm inclined to think you pulled this outta your ass too.
Who the [BAD WORD] cares about Rank? Of all things you could have chosen to ######### about in this game, you pick rank?
SovererignKing said:
Dodging isn't for “easy” matches, it’s for fair matches.
So you admit you dodge lobbies because you think it's fair to do so.
Congrats you just proved your entitlement in that one sentence.
You're not justified to dodge lobbies because you think it's fair for the same reason you are not justified as a survivor to dictate what the killer can do in his matches.
I said this before, I said this again.
Get a [BAD WORD] grip.
fair as in fair to win(not bullshit games where you only win if they want you to).
-
@Runiver said:
@powerbats said:
@Runiver said:
They also divided by 3 the speedboost of BL2.
It's not "only BL3".While true they're trying to make it much more smooth without having to take into account BL3. I'm going to wait and see what actually hits PTB for testing.
It's just a plain nerf while the maps are still broken. The main issue when it comes to bloodlust, for survivors, is the fact that bloodlust 3 is used to cheese free hits because some pallets become unsafe because of it. The main issue if you nerf bloodlust is that actual players will be hindered by the nerf since survivors will be able to loop windows brainlessly and get rewarded for it.
The real nerf bloodlust need is the removal of bloodlust 3 and a slight increase in speed to acquire bloodlust 2.
This way, you force survivors to use more pallets in a chase to break bloodlust, and you do not empathize cheesing and lame tactics such as using the same window repeatedly or using bloodlust to cheese hits.Tho I doubt it's gonna happen since these devs prefer to bandaid rather than actually think it through.
yeah. If you just take BL 3 i will be able to do 3 turns of the shack at best (and maybe even not using the god plank and take a hit instead to be more efficient too.
-
@powerbats said:
@Peanits said:
When it's time, it will be officially announced.
Get torches and pitchforks ready if I don't get picked.
I mean that's cool and hopefully it's sooner rather than later.
NO thats my place shoooo... (im just joking around of course)
-
@taboosouls said:
Isn't the purpose of the White Ward to keep you from losing an item? I took in a purple tool box with white ward perk so I wouldn't lose it if I died and the Killer did not did have Franklin's demise. Why did I lose my toolbox when I died?You need to have the item you brought in to the match in your hands.
-
@Grey87 said:
Btw OP, did it ever come into your mind that people are not trying to be ######### by try to have fun, and don't really think it's "bad" to t-bag?
Please stop spreading bs like "t-bagging = #########". Thanks.Not to be that guy but if you know that certain behaviours are considered by the large populace as bad manners why do them exactly? Because i dont and i (most of the time) killers are decent with me.
-
@Vietfox said:
I usually play as a survivor, but when i play as a killer, drop the pallet on me and t-bag afterwards i honestly laugh xD I think survivor's faces and moves are pretty hilarious.
@Grey87 said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
I Agree. Then they ask "Why facecamp( it does not exist anymore by the way).You obviously have no idea what they mean by "face camp" then.
Facecamp was and still is "blocking the unhook prompt by standing still in front of the survivor usually with your(killer) face facing the hooked survivor hence the word "facecamping". Since that is not possible anymore facecamping got patched out and therefore it was removed so "it does not exist anymore by the way".
-
@Tsulan said:
Vietfox said:No, it's fine the way it is. The more slots we get the more similar builds will be.
You mean like DS, SC, SB and BT or Unbreakable?
We already have that.Vietfox said:
BACKSTABBER said:a 5th perk is strictly needed as reaward for prestige 3 or devotion levels
Cause [BAD WORD] beginners, right? It's fine the way it is right now, and if you think a 5th slot is STRICTLY needed you might rethink about your gameplay and skills.
I agree. Older players shouldn't be at a advantage.
Older players (usually) have the best perk of the game : game sense.
-
@ShadowClaw said:
Today during a game, at the end, the killer was like. "Tried to flashlight save, kind of bm (bad manners or whatever)"
Then left.
Never thought I would see a killer call a mechanic of the game bm.Yeah some killers are just dumb dumbs too.
-
Yeeeee.
-
@Visionmaker said:
pauloandrade22 said:@Mc_Harty said:
SovererignKing said:
Easy matches my ass. Randoms who are good at the game can stomp Killers without the help of voice comms. Where’s your justification for using voice comms? You can play with your friends without them. Or you can compensate for having that “extra help” by slapping on No Mither. Won’t do that though, will you? Look in the mirror dude, you want to call Killers chicken ######### and “only want easy matches”? What about you and your friends? You want easy matches. Why don’t you, and a large portion of the Survivor community, man up and accept you’re getting help you shouldn’t be getting and play fair with Killers? LOL what the [BAD WORD]? Why are you so triggered? It's also cute you think I'm a survivor main. Must be because I disagreed with you being justified to dodge matches unless you're going to be harrassed. I also never said anything about voicechat being justified at all. You really showed me by arguing against a point I wasn't making. Good job. I don't care how bad the balance is in this game, no one is justified to a win. Sorry to burst your bubble but I prefer to not have this victim mentality that plagues the killer community nowadays.
Seriously, what in the actual [BAD WORD] lol.
I belive killers have the right to avoid potential Ebulliying seesions though.
Everyone should have the right to avoid toxicity.
Right now, only killers have that option through lobby dodging.
I remember only one truly toxic killer and whenever i saw his/her profile with shift/tab i said " Oh its a "insert their profile name here" and i just did my thing. it was when to pip you needed 10000K BP. If the person facecamped me it was sorta normal and good because i wanted to face a normal killer as well so i was fine. The rest were like mostly normal ( i never saw the same facecamper twice in a row for one.
-
And china pings too.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
I belive killers have the right to avoid potential Ebulliying seesions though.I just said that killers should dodge if they think they're going to get harassed...
Twice.
Me sees that .
-
@Visionmaker said:
pauloandrade22 said:@Mc_Harty said:
SovererignKing said:
Easy matches my ass. Randoms who are good at the game can stomp Killers without the help of voice comms. Where’s your justification for using voice comms? You can play with your friends without them. Or you can compensate for having that “extra help” by slapping on No Mither. Won’t do that though, will you? Look in the mirror dude, you want to call Killers chicken ######### and “only want easy matches”? What about you and your friends? You want easy matches. Why don’t you, and a large portion of the Survivor community, man up and accept you’re getting help you shouldn’t be getting and play fair with Killers? LOL what the [BAD WORD]? Why are you so triggered? It's also cute you think I'm a survivor main. Must be because I disagreed with you being justified to dodge matches unless you're going to be harrassed. I also never said anything about voicechat being justified at all. You really showed me by arguing against a point I wasn't making. Good job. I don't care how bad the balance is in this game, no one is justified to a win. Sorry to burst your bubble but I prefer to not have this victim mentality that plagues the killer community nowadays.
Seriously, what in the actual [BAD WORD] lol.
I belive killers have the right to avoid potential Ebulliying seesions though.
Everyone should have the right to avoid toxicity.
Right now, only killers have that option through lobby dodging.
When i play survivor (personal view on the matter) I know what the killer feels when camping ( a feeling of impotence or powerlessness (or its an idiot)) so i empathise with them and i dont get mad at them i get "mad" at the game itself.
SWF mostly have no reason to be bullies unless i was a jerk from the start( and its rarely unprovocked(bad english sorry) or they want to ruin my day and i will 100% do the same to them as best i can too. Be nice too me im nice to you too.