pauloandrade22
pauloandrade22
About
- Username
- pauloandrade22
- Joined
- Visits
- 45
- Last Active
Comments
-
@RSB said:
@powerbats said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@powerbats said:
@RSB said:
@powerbats said:
@RSB said:
Oh, give me a break, snowflake. Every word insults you in some way. You are the perfect example of why children should not be raised in a "my little, precious special boy" way, because you are extremly protective about yourself, and have ego higher than your intelligence. If stupidity could fly, you would be hitting the ceiling with your head.
You just proved my point yet again, I merely pointed out how you like to insult at pretty much every opportunity and the 1st sentence you do it again. You've also conveniently ignored where I clearly said your insults don't bother me and in fact amuse me.
As if your words hurt me, buddy. You just try to look more intelligent, than you actually are, and by sitting on this forum 24/7 you won't find friends.
No, that was not an insult, snowboy.
You once again prove my points and no one sits on this forum 24/7 because that's impossible both physically and practically. I've also made friends on the forum, we don't always agree with each other but we're till friends.
But go ahead and keep up with the usual, it doesn't bother me in the least.
Dude just ignore him/her. Don't feed the insulter please.
I know feeding trolls is a bad thing to do, but it's almost like the Shape perk, Play With Your Food. You can't resist toying with them sometimes.
Said the guy, who seeks insults in everyone's posts.
The best way to stop an insult is to be superior and NOT INSULT BACK.
-
@MojoTheFabulous said:
Most of the time I will watch until the end, or at least for a while. If i'm unlucky enough to die super early, then no. -
@powerbats said:
@RSB said:
@powerbats said:
@RSB said:
Oh, give me a break, snowflake. Every word insults you in some way. You are the perfect example of why children should not be raised in a "my little, precious special boy" way, because you are extremly protective about yourself, and have ego higher than your intelligence. If stupidity could fly, you would be hitting the ceiling with your head.
You just proved my point yet again, I merely pointed out how you like to insult at pretty much every opportunity and the 1st sentence you do it again. You've also conveniently ignored where I clearly said your insults don't bother me and in fact amuse me.
As if your words hurt me, buddy. You just try to look more intelligent, than you actually are, and by sitting on this forum 24/7 you won't find friends.
No, that was not an insult, snowboy.
You once again prove my points and no one sits on this forum 24/7 because that's impossible both physically and practically. I've also made friends on the forum, we don't always agree with each other but we're till friends.
But go ahead and keep up with the usual, it doesn't bother me in the least.
Dude just ignore him/her. Don't feed the insulter please.
-
@pemberley said:
I feel like it should be in survivors’ best interests to continue working on the objective instead of playing a waiting game of who gets caught first and jump in the hatch.Especially when you manage to escape from the grasp or hook, or you actually help the other survivor off the hook and heal, it just leaves a sour feeling when fellow survivors are solely in it for themselves and throw you under the bus.
Na nah You're dead dude.
-
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
Jack11803 said:@Tsulan said:
@greenzebra64 said:
Giving up a perk slot for that perk isn't worth the bloodpoints. BBQ is way better plus killers get more bloodpoints than survivors.
WGLF is superior to BBQ because it´s way easier to get WGLF stacks than BBQ stacks. If i have a good match i leave with 50.000+ BPs as survivor. Without any offerings.
You’re high as a kite if you think WGLF stacks are easier to get. It literally relies on teammates failure, while you being there and NOT the other 2; AND almost never doing gens. It’s a recipe for disaster. Meanwhile BBQ gives you stacks for just not being complete #########
Let's see, unhooking someone and getting hit next to the hook = 2 stacks.
That's clearly harder than hooking every survivor once./S
I have to agree that BBQ stacks are much easier to get than WGLF stacks tho.
Not for me. I usually get 2 stacks on a camping killer unhook. That´s really easy money. I rush in with BT.
I get the 4 stacks of BBQ way more frequently especially if i played well in that game than the WGLF (and if they are camping i am probably going to go to the hook)
I'll admit that with WGLF you can get them twice as fast though.
I´m used to drop everything the moment a survivor gets downed. Unless i use my scavenger build (Ace in the Hole + Plunderers) i equip Empathy and try to position myself close to the survivor, before he gets downed.
I like My gennies personally. Especially if there are 4 survivors (including me) il let them save them if possible.
I just go in for points. Unhooking nets way more points than the gen.
Gen makes people survive and "win". Saving means usually death (or a pip or both)
-
@Vietfox said:
Orion said:@Vietfox said:
If every killer gets to be extremely challange/a certain death... Dont you think that would mean it's unbalanced for the other side? Needs to be challenging for both.
Every Killer should be certain death 1v1, because that's how asymmetrical games work. It shouldn't be even remotely challenging for the power role when it comes to 1v1 the other side. The fact that it's more efficient to have one person looping the Killer while everyone else works separately on generators means there's a big balance problem.
As i said once: if the survivor is skilled enough should be able to deserve better than a certain death, asymmetrical or not.
The problem is that when the killer is as skilled as the character allows them to be they are powerless if the survivors are better unless nurse and huntress (billy still gets looped but has his saw which mitigates it to an extent)
-
@Vietfox said:
pauloandrade22 said:@Vietfox said:
pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said: Tsulan said:
@Vietfox said: Tsulan said:
Vietfox said: There are many killers who manage to stay at rank 1 till the end of the season, it can't be that unbalanced if that happens. People who usually complain too much about balance are usually people who:
1 - need to get better 2 - hate when they get destroyed, doesnt matter if rarely happens. I'm not saying that game doesnt need some tweaks, but some suggestions or accusations towards survivors are simply ridiculous, especially when some people think all survivors are the same.
It's not about staying at rank 1. It's about how stressful it is and how much effort each side has to bring in to "enjoy" the game.
A rank 1 non nurse/billy player has to try harder than the average survivor.
Rank 1 is suposed to be challenging.
Other killers have to try "harder" because nurse is too op. Some people got used to her due to the amazing results and feel like other killers should perform the same way. A good nurse with a slug build can get 4 K in less than 2 or 3 gens in almost every match. I agree that rank 1 should be challenging. But it should be challenging for everyone. Not just killers.
It is, and when survivors have to face that nurse i was talking about it's extremely challenging/a certain death Exactly what every killer should be . Unfortunately its not.
If every killer gets to be extremely challenging/a certain death... Dont you think that would mean it's unbalanced for the other side? Needs to be challenging for both.
Not to be killer biased but a single survivor should not be able to stall the killer . They should have to use mind games and wits to outplay the killer or be downed because the killer played better than them.
When it comes to survival everything can be used.
Yes . Just have a ready counter for the opponent that does not rely on being a nurse ,huntress or the survivor being bad and i'd be happy.
-
@Vietfox said:
pauloandrade22 said:@Vietfox said:
Tsulan said:
@Vietfox said: Tsulan said:
Vietfox said: There are many killers who manage to stay at rank 1 till the end of the season, it can't be that unbalanced if that happens. People who usually complain too much about balance are usually people who:
1 - need to get better 2 - hate when they get destroyed, doesnt matter if rarely happens. I'm not saying that game doesnt need some tweaks, but some suggestions or accusations towards survivors are simply ridiculous, especially when some people think all survivors are the same.
It's not about staying at rank 1. It's about how stressful it is and how much effort each side has to bring in to "enjoy" the game.
A rank 1 non nurse/billy player has to try harder than the average survivor.
Rank 1 is suposed to be challenging.
Other killers have to try "harder" because nurse is too op. Some people got used to her due to the amazing results and feel like other killers should perform the same way. A good nurse with a slug build can get 4 K in less than 2 or 3 gens in almost every match. I agree that rank 1 should be challenging. But it should be challenging for everyone. Not just killers.
It is, and when survivors have to face that nurse i was talking about it's extremely challenging/a certain death
Exactly what every killer should be . Unfortunately its not.
If every killer gets to be extremely challenging/a certain death... Dont you think that would mean it's unbalanced for the other side? Needs to be challenging for both.
Not to be killer biased but a single survivor should not be able to stall the killer . They should have to use mind games and wits to outplay the killer or be downed because the killer played better than them.
-
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
Jack11803 said:@Tsulan said:
@greenzebra64 said:
Giving up a perk slot for that perk isn't worth the bloodpoints. BBQ is way better plus killers get more bloodpoints than survivors.
WGLF is superior to BBQ because it´s way easier to get WGLF stacks than BBQ stacks. If i have a good match i leave with 50.000+ BPs as survivor. Without any offerings.
You’re high as a kite if you think WGLF stacks are easier to get. It literally relies on teammates failure, while you being there and NOT the other 2; AND almost never doing gens. It’s a recipe for disaster. Meanwhile BBQ gives you stacks for just not being complete #########
Let's see, unhooking someone and getting hit next to the hook = 2 stacks.
That's clearly harder than hooking every survivor once./S
I have to agree that BBQ stacks are much easier to get than WGLF stacks tho.
Not for me. I usually get 2 stacks on a camping killer unhook. That´s really easy money. I rush in with BT.
I get the 4 stacks of BBQ way more frequently especially if i played well in that game than the WGLF (and if they are camping i am probably going to go to the hook)
I'll admit that with WGLF you can get them twice as fast though.
I´m used to drop everything the moment a survivor gets downed. Unless i use my scavenger build (Ace in the Hole + Plunderers) i equip Empathy and try to position myself close to the survivor, before he gets downed.
I like My gennies personally. Especially if there are 4 survivors (including me) il let them save them if possible.
-
@Vietfox said:
Tsulan said:@Vietfox said:
Tsulan said:
Vietfox said: There are many killers who manage to stay at rank 1 till the end of the season, it can't be that unbalanced if that happens. People who usually complain too much about balance are usually people who:
1 - need to get better
2 - hate when they get destroyed, doesnt matter if rarely happens.
I'm not saying that game doesnt need some tweaks, but some suggestions or accusations towards survivors are simply ridiculous, especially when some people think all survivors are the same.
It's not about staying at rank 1. It's about how stressful it is and how much effort each side has to bring in to "enjoy" the game.
A rank 1 non nurse/billy player has to try harder than the average survivor.
Rank 1 is suposed to be challenging.
Other killers have to try "harder" because nurse is too op. Some people got used to her due to the amazing results and feel like other killers should perform the same way.
A good nurse with a slug build can get 4 K in less than 2 or 3 gens in almost every match.
I agree that rank 1 should be challenging. But it should be challenging for everyone. Not just killers.
It is, and when survivors have to face that nurse i was talking about it's extremely challenging/a certain death
Exactly what every killer should be . Unfortunately its not.
-
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
Jack11803 said:@Tsulan said:
@greenzebra64 said:
Giving up a perk slot for that perk isn't worth the bloodpoints. BBQ is way better plus killers get more bloodpoints than survivors.
WGLF is superior to BBQ because it´s way easier to get WGLF stacks than BBQ stacks. If i have a good match i leave with 50.000+ BPs as survivor. Without any offerings.
You’re high as a kite if you think WGLF stacks are easier to get. It literally relies on teammates failure, while you being there and NOT the other 2; AND almost never doing gens. It’s a recipe for disaster. Meanwhile BBQ gives you stacks for just not being complete #########
Let's see, unhooking someone and getting hit next to the hook = 2 stacks.
That's clearly harder than hooking every survivor once./S
I have to agree that BBQ stacks are much easier to get than WGLF stacks tho.
Not for me. I usually get 2 stacks on a camping killer unhook. That´s really easy money. I rush in with BT.
I get the 4 stacks of BBQ way more frequently especially if i played well in that game than the WGLF (and if they are camping i am probably going to go to the hook)
I'll admit that with WGLF you can get them twice as fast though.
-
@Tsulan said:
Jack11803 said:@Tsulan said:
@greenzebra64 said:
Giving up a perk slot for that perk isn't worth the bloodpoints. BBQ is way better plus killers get more bloodpoints than survivors.
WGLF is superior to BBQ because it´s way easier to get WGLF stacks than BBQ stacks. If i have a good match i leave with 50.000+ BPs as survivor. Without any offerings.
You’re high as a kite if you think WGLF stacks are easier to get. It literally relies on teammates failure, while you being there and NOT the other 2; AND almost never doing gens. It’s a recipe for disaster. Meanwhile BBQ gives you stacks for just not being complete #########
Let's see, unhooking someone and getting hit next to the hook = 2 stacks.
That's clearly harder than hooking every survivor once./S
I have to agree that BBQ stacks are much easier to get than WGLF stacks tho.
-
3 man meming squad too.
-
I had 3 man claudette with a 4th random claudette that DC'ed and it was so funny that i just farmed the ######### out of them they let them escape.
-
@Zarathos said:
Gentlemen this is what we call fatigue. If you hate complaining just play the game. The problems with swf in DBD is that de-pip squad released a play-style that is unbeatable in the current meta. Now people are using this technique to crush all the killers. The devs haven't done anything to limit this strat and as a result you have high rank players getting 3 min long games. This is a blatantly broken strategy in the game that you haven't experienced enough to understand that queuing up for 5 mins of waiting for a 3 min games is ridiculous. People will argue that this is not the case that not everyone is doing this that only a small percentage are using and there right to a degree.Its can only become more often encountered as the strat becomes more and more popularized. But do go on explain how inaction is going to make this game more enjoyable. Btw i wouldn't be knocking the strat if i didn't try it and i can say with certainty this strat is broken.They showed the cold hard truth to everyone (some refuse it though). They released nothing .
-
@245_Trioxin said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
Stalling is not outplaying.I've seen this stated a few times recently, and it's a pretty confusing statement. Can you please elaborate on this?
Basically its when i know you are running in the same exact places that millions have ran(and i know your routing too by the way) but my character (a non nurse killer basically can't counter it unless they ######### up ) just to stall me without any attempt to lose or outplay me . Its very frustrating. Especially when people say that that is outplaying the killer(its not).
-
@C4Garuda said:
Besides blatant facecamping, and some little things here and there im not so upset with the game like others. Sure it has some balancing issues but hell COD does too other games as well that are AAA and people still ride that train. Most complaints are little kids who dont want to learn or counter, they want things handed. While high ranks do need some sort of rework, complaining about DS, SB, SC, OR NOED is baby cries. When BBQ and chili was out i at first thought it was OP but you have to learn to not just counter play each killer , you have to counter perks. Early game as surv against killers high up i assume they run bbq ruin til proven otherwise. Then ill play them accordingly. As killer if i see obsession i assume all have DS and counter accordingly. Montos camera flicker kills DS if timed perfectly. Ppl need to just git gud stop crying and learn to counter.Sometimes its the killer you chose with the perks, or what the survs used or the map. You cant win every match, with the same perks all the time etc. Those who just want things handed are usually little kids who need SWF to rank, or they wanna be Ochido and play toxic til you [BAD WORD] them and they DC. Clown came out, oh hes OP...guarantee new killer comes out, they will claim OP. This game is going in the right direction, some people just need to stop bitching.DS needs to be destroyed. Thats all.
-
A vaccum is an teleport too. There is 0 vaccum when hooking otherwise the killer would teleport to the hook as soon as they could hook a survivor.
-
No it was too strong and unfair too.
-
@Peasant said:
I honestly don't usually watch matches play out once I die so I'm curious. Does anyone actually watch matches play out after their end?Probably. If it was a long game im usually invested in it enough to watch my fellow survivors try and win still.
-
The problem for me is that i want kills more than pips. Piping and all escaping is not a win. (And if i would get the piping requirements from hits and hooks i probably killed survivors anyways.)
-
@MegMain98 said:
No point in bitching for survivor nerfs and killer buffs...I just picked up playing killer again and I’m climbing up the ranks easy as pie. Just got all the rest of the adept killer trophies I needed. Don’t expect a 4K every game. You WILL get outplayed. If you know what you are doing you can outplay the other side easily. Sometimes you’ll be the one outplayed. Just don’t see the point in anymore killer buffs. They don’t NEED anymore buffs. Small little tweaks to fix certain bugs for sure but these huge buffs people are calling for are stupid. Survivors surely don’t need any more buffs but killers really don’t either. Just play the game and enjoy it. Sometimes you’ll get rekt by SWF groups and sometimes you’ll destroy them.Stalling is not outplaying.
-
@greenzebra64 said:
Giving up a perk slot for that perk isn't worth the bloodpoints. BBQ is way better plus killers get more bloodpoints than survivors.No. Its fine as is.
-
@ForsakenLemon said:
Dont worry you just got too strong survivors.
Every game? Every single game? The fact is if it isnt a SWF team who go out of their way to be toxic, its people who were in a high rank who is in a lower one after the rank reset.
Every survivor has good builds, who clearly put time in to them, with teachables from every survivor, like Sprint Burst, Self Care, DS, Borrowed Time
yes................................
-
@Vietfox said:
@RSB said:
@powerbats said:
@yeet said:
@powerbats said:
The killers will sometimes keep addons depending on how well they did so fi you say get brutal killer you oftentimes come out with 1 or both addons still.you're so full of it
When the facts don't agree with you insult, your same response every time someone disagrees with you or makes a statement you don't like.
Oh, another one "insults you", when pointing out your lies?
Can you stop assuming @powerbats lied? He talked about his experience. He might be mistaken, might be a bug or something else, but you have no right to call someone a liar when has already explained what could happen.
Exactly
-
@ForsakenLemon said:
Okay so, I only have started playing killer recently. I used to only play them just to get my dailys, I never bought perks or leveled them up and I got to rank 14 and thats when I started trying to play killer for real since i have all the survivor teachables I dont need to rank them up anymore.I feel like the skill gap between the survivor and killer is too much, I feel like killer should not Pip if you don't get atleast two kills. As a level 19 hag and level 12 nurse I really really feel like I dont belong in a moderately high rank, im currently in rank 12, yet I feel like I should be in rank 15-17, the only way I can think to counter this is make it take more pips to rank up or to add more ranks, like up to 30.
I went from having rather casual games where I was getting 2/3 kills each game, to ones where I am being gen-rushed and looped, and only able to get 1 kill (if I am lucky), its made me not want to play killer anymore, because the fact of the matter is, im barely getting any bloodpoints in killer games anymore because I /can't/ do anything.
TL:DR - Killers level up too fast and dont have the skill/perks to help them get out of it
Also INB4 "you dont needs perks to be good blah blah blah" - No but all the survivors have their crutch perks yet I don't, so it puts me at a disadvantage.
Dont worry you just got too strong survivors.
-
@feffrey said:
pauloandrade22 said:@feffrey said:
pauloandrade22 said:
@feffrey said: that's a common excuse most killers make when they have no argument against DS and why they wanted it nerfed. call the poster a "troll" i have a thousand arguments but walls tend to not be good discussing partners right next killers will complain about MedKits and teammates healing each other without any medical back ground lol... they're some tough walls to crack Honestly Desive strike should be in the game if anybody was carrying you you would wiggly and strike the killer. why not remove mori from the game? no killer should get a easy free kill. I'm sure you will reply well I had to hook them first
but again your failed attempt to keep the survivor hooked shouldn't be rewarded
So now you want me to camp? or what is your argument? (aside from making the killer lose no matter what because of ....... reasons.......)
camping is all up to you and if its your playstyle then it is no difference right?
Ummmmmm..... what?
-
@Utna said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
But if i had to follow every person's imaginary rules i'd go cray cray. And some of the people insult me when i dont follow them so thats more reason to not follow their rules.You're absolutely right ! And I believe that's why we're discussing those rules right now in this forum. Social rules are all imaginary by nature, that's why their constantly evolving with the years and the people who debate them. That doesn't mean they can't be usefull, but at least it means they are not carved in stone.
In my opinion the more important thing is to not believe "rules" (any kind of them) are for losers only ... neither in real life, nor in a video game, because THIS leads to pain and madness. But on the other end, every one should have the right to debate those rules as they please.
Makes sense.
Me likes you. I wish more people on these forums were as good partners of discussion as you are.
And most imaginary rules in DBD only are made so that you(often as killer loses).
The best one was when i was reported (when i won fairly without camping or tunneling (at least to what i think they are)) when i got the to Mori all 4 survivors in a round with the wraith (second worst killer). I may have slugged tho ( i think).
And most real life social rules have logic (like don't go around nude for one or don't insult others) they make sense.
-
@feffrey said:
pauloandrade22 said:@feffrey said:
that's a common excuse most killers make when they have no argument against DS and why they wanted it nerfed. call the poster a "troll"
i have a thousand arguments but walls tend to not be good discussing partners
right next killers will complain about MedKits and teammates healing each other without any medical back ground lol... they're some tough walls to crack
Honestly Desive strike should be in the game if anybody was carrying you you would wiggly and strike the killer.
why not remove mori from the game? no killer should get a easy free kill.
I'm sure you will reply well I had to hook them first
but again your failed attempt to keep the survivor hooked shouldn't be rewardedSo now you want me to camp? or what is your argument? (aside from making the killer lose no matter what because of ....... reasons.......)
-
@Utna said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
Who cares anyways?And lets not compare games to real life please.
I did not try to compare real life and video games for the sake of just comparing them. I tried to demonstrate how it follows the same ethic logic so you might understand more easely.
@pauloandrade22 said:
If i had to follow DBD's imaginary rules(social rules as you called them) then i'd quit . Asides from cheating the real rules say anything is fair game.See, if you were to say the same sentence, just replacing the words DBD by "people" you would be labeled as a psychopath and doctors might make you to take a proper medication.
Now of course, I'm not saying you're a real life psychopath, but in the DBD setting you're following the same pattern of logic as a psychopath ... which make me think your behavior may contribute to destroy the game.
I'll follow the game's rules still (no cheating of course thats not a proper way to win).
But if i had to follow every person's imaginary rules i'd go cray cray. And some of the people insult me when i dont follow them so thats more reason to not follow their rules.
But i do want them to have fun if they are normal or nice too. If they are toxic i'll be toxic back to them though.
And i respect your POV too and it makes logical sense.
I think that fake rules like ( dont tunnel ,camper ,tryhard) are the ones that would kill the game if the devs followed them. Thank god they did not.
And its not like i like to camp or tunnel ( i prefer chasing and outsmarting them) but the game forces me to do it sometimes( if i want to win which i do)
-
@Utna said:
@FrenziedRoach said:
"A common call of the scrub is to cry that the kind of play in which one tries to win at all costs is “boring” or “not fun.” Who knows what objective the scrub has, but we know his objective is not truly to win. Yours is. Your objective is good and right and true, and let no one tell you otherwise. You have the power to dispatch those who would tell you otherwise, anyway. Simply beat them."Now I wished I could writte a proper english answer because your post and the article litteraly made me want to throw up and I really want you to understand why.
Heard about "end justifies the means" ? In real life, every single war has started with this tiny little idea in someone's head ; this happens when that person thinks he/she is entitled to win something at any cost, even putting someone else's life at risk. Nazis for instance thought that the german was the strongest people of the world, and because of that belief, they couldn't even imagine their possible faillure. So, like you said, they "played to win" and in the end they pissed so many nations off that they packed together to put the german down ... just like Isis, and so many more example in history. This specific belief : playing to win = the end justifies the means IS WRONG BY NATURE ; let me explain why.
In real life, there are the "rules" of physics, which prevent us to fly without any kind of help or equipment. In video games, you might compare them to the game code. These nature "rules" are concrete, and one cannot break them even if they whished to. Anyways, on top of what nature gived us, human beings have their own social rules. Those are very important, to prevent people from murdering each other whenever they want to (that was just an example). Every once in a while a person or a group, decide to challenge those social rules, because why not ? They're right about something : Nature let them kill whenever they want. So why not doing it ? Because the human species would probably die, if there were no social rule to prevent mass murdering. So as a concequence, there are social rules to prevent this behavior, and thus come justice : a force aimed to prevent such things to happen. In the end : a murderer CAN kill people but he shouldn't anyway, because sooner or later he/her might face the justice of men.
In video games, there is a game code, and social rules as well. Of course we could discuss at length about what is fair play and what is not ; this is decided here in the community debates. Anyways, when someone says I "play to win" and uses tactics wich are frowned upon ... people doesn't die of course, but surely people quit the game. After a while players with some ethic sence are tired to constantly incarnate the justice they believe they need to punish toxic behavior and in the end the game's player base become thiner and thiner.
So yes Mr Roach, you might believe social rules are for losers. You might even believe that breaking social rules, even in a simple video game has no concequences, but anything you do ever, trigger some kind of reaction. Letting people believe that they may break social rules without any kind of backfire, is downright criminal, because in one side or another there is always pain down this road. In DBD's case the risk is the game's lifespan itself. Now what is the point of winning, if you can't play the game anymore ?
Who cares anyways?
And lets not compare games to real life please. If i had to follow DBD's imaginary rules(social rules as you called them) then i'd quit . Asides from cheating the real rules say anything is fair game.
-
@Vietfox said:
@Tsulan said:
@Vietfox said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
I also play both...
I think everyone does.
Not sure about this one. Unless you consider the people that play killer/survivor for dailies to play both sides.
We sure have some die hard survivor mains which would prefer that the game dies before giving killers even the slightest buff.I don't mind the "survivor mains" Unless they are rude AF.
Although i will still think their ideas and stances are bad and unfair for the killers as they right now have reasons to complain (and generally "killer mains" tend to be a lot more polite and rational too) So i stick to the killer's side for now.
And remember to Burn DS BS.
Not all survivor mains are the same, neither their ideas.
Although i'm a survivor main i play as a killer more often that you think. Mainly to get better as a survivor, learn from other survivors, don't get rusty on how does the killer think and stuff, so i know pretty well how the killer works and what kind of stuff has to deal with.Am i the only one who noticed that a mod tried to bring this thread back on track?
I think we totally derailed this one.
Please stop!Sometimes i can be too passionate, sorry
we all are dont worry.
-
@Vietfox said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
I also play both...
I think everyone does.
Not sure about this one. Unless you consider the people that play killer/survivor for dailies to play both sides.
We sure have some die hard survivor mains which would prefer that the game dies before giving killers even the slightest buff.I don't mind the "survivor mains" Unless they are rude AF.
Although i will still think their ideas and stances are bad and unfair for the killers as they right now have reasons to complain (and generally "killer mains" tend to be a lot more polite and rational too) So i stick to the killer's side for now.
And remember to Burn DS BS.
Not all survivor mains are the same, neither their ideas.
Although i'm a survivor main i play as a killer more often that you think. Mainly to get better as a survivor, learn from other survivors, don't get rusty on how does the killer think and stuff, so i know pretty well how the killer works and what kind of stuff has to deal with.makes sense and i respecc you .
@Tsulan said:
@Vietfox said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
I also play both...
I think everyone does.
Not sure about this one. Unless you consider the people that play killer/survivor for dailies to play both sides.
We sure have some die hard survivor mains which would prefer that the game dies before giving killers even the slightest buff.I don't mind the "survivor mains" Unless they are rude AF.
Although i will still think their ideas and stances are bad and unfair for the killers as they right now have reasons to complain (and generally "killer mains" tend to be a lot more polite and rational too) So i stick to the killer's side for now.
And remember to Burn DS BS.
Not all survivor mains are the same, neither their ideas.
Although i'm a survivor main i play as a killer more often that you think. Mainly to get better as a survivor, learn from other survivors, don't get rusty on how does the killer think and stuff, so i know pretty well how the killer works and what kind of stuff has to deal with.Am i the only one who noticed that a mod tried to bring this thread back on track?
I think we totally derailed this one.
Please stop!SIR YES SIR!!!
-
@Vietfox said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@KiraElijah said:
Everybody needs to stop crying about how unfair their role is...For Killer: Don’t complain about pallet loops, you can power through. Don’t complain about bodyblocks, you can drop somebody and down the blocker. Don’t say swf is unfair, accept loss or adapt to how they play. If they are over altruistic, camp. If they gen rush, limit chase time and patrol.
For Survivors: Stop crying about camping, make time for other survivors. Stop complaining about tunneling, try to hold the killer. Stop hating on sluggers, bring unbreakable.
Just stop crying and learn to play.
Agree with survivor's things
Not the killer's though.
Of course you don't, you are SO killer sided.
Despite me being a survivor main i gotta agree with that. Ofc i can say camping or tunneling is annoying, but that's it.of course i am s/.
-
@Zexzis said:
Using the Nurse is damn near impossible you can’t keep up with anyone and the lunge is a damn joke you can’t even hit anyone without being directly behind them. We should get some additional buffs like instead of having to get the add on to see where your blinks are going that should just be implemented on her and maybe have it to where she doesn’t look down and shake her head but look up and have the same effect so you can’t loose the survivors so fast. I get she is supposed to be hard but it doesn’t seem hard it seems impossible at this point. Please consider this because i would love to see more nurse players instead of the basic wraith trapper michael and clownGet better.
-
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
I also play both...
I think everyone does.
Not sure about this one. Unless you consider the people that play killer/survivor for dailies to play both sides.
We sure have some diehard survivor mains which would prefer that the game dies before giving killers even the slightest buff.I think that the "survivor only mains" have played killer like 10 times and for dailys and have if they have seen their issues im fine. If they see the issues and advocate other wise then i have a problem with that.
-
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
I also play both...
I think everyone does.
Not sure about this one. Unless you consider the people that play killer/survivor for dailies to play both sides.
We sure have some die hard survivor mains which would prefer that the game dies before giving killers even the slightest buff.I don't mind the "survivor mains" Unless they are rude AF.
Although i will still think their ideas and stances are bad and unfair for the killers as they right now have reasons to complain (and generally "killer mains" tend to be a lot more polite and rational too) So i stick to the killer's side for now.
And remember to Burn DS BS.
-
@Vietfox said:
Please be a troll, please be a troll...Is just troll..
-
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
I also play both...
I think everyone does.
-
@Tsulan said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
I also play both...
HELL YEAH .
-
hahahahahahahaha
-
@Vietfox said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
That's why i edited my own comment, but you replied too fast
I replied at the speed of light and sound (ignore that they are not the same pls)
-
@Vietfox said:
@pauloandrade22 said:
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
That's why i edited my own comment, but you replied too fast
AH .i feels sad.
-
@HulkHodn said:
Hi iam new and started yesterday with dbd
Imo its unfair for survivors to only run and hide
There should be weapons for survivors like shotgun
or pistols. The devs should do something or i will stop
playing this Game. Survivors are doomed to loose every Game
coz they cant do anything to the KillerPaulo uses Bash attack.
Over 9999 damage .
Hulk fainted. -
@Vietfox said:
Omg you are about to be bashed, brace yourself.Also its just a fisherman.
-
@Vietfox said:
@Orion @Tsulan @SovererignKing @pauloandrade22 i release you killer mains xDThanks but i play both sides.
And i am respectfull.
But im happy you remembered me though.
-
@Global said:
DS shouldnt exist in the first place -
@feffrey said:
that's a common excuse most killers make when they have no argument against DS and why they wanted it nerfed. call the poster a "troll"i have a thousand arguments but walls tend to not be good discussing partners
-
@feffrey said:
decisive strike has a hard counter you can juggle them every few seconds or hug a corner until you get to the nearest hook.or just let them all hit it early mid game and after you drop one go for others until they all use it
Hard counter= completely Nullifies said perk or ability
What you stated was a risky soft counter at best (easily hard countered by body blocking.
-
@Incarnate said:
Just throwing my cents in here.Yes, as Peanits said, it is moderated, but they don't read every post or thread here, in fact as far as I know, they only gets a heads up when someone FLAGS a post. They might get a heads up if certain words are used, not sure on that, I'm sure @Peanits can enlighten us on that. I'm sure they'd moderate a post that was in violation if they stumpled upon it while reading peoples post, but simply put, we have to help them, otherwise it's impossible for so few people to have eyes on every post created it, there are so many post being created.
Have peps like me or powerbats as mods and those would be cracked down for sure.