ReallyBigShoe
ReallyBigShoe
About
- Username
- ReallyBigShoe
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@Ultra_Dyce said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1019776#Comment_1019776
I doubt it, all I see from your posts is crying about ruin and killer nerfs. There's a reason you see freddy played like 1/3 of the game at red ranks. Same reason you see huntress another 1/3 of the time (carried by hitboxes 2x the size of the hatchets). He is easy as hell to play.
You don't even need to M1 to put people to sleep, just keep running around the same loop and spamming snares and you will get hits eventually; it's just a matter of if the other survivors are pounding out the gens or not in the meantime, and if you can afford to do it.
This is how you can point out someone who is both A) New to the game, and B) your typical one-sided survivor main.
Apparently this person doesn't know you can be a survivor main, and play a lot of killer. Imagine there being two modes available at the main menu screen, with the ability to choose. :O
NO WAY!
KEKW
-
@Jholla31 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1019780#Comment_1019780
See original post, not just the headline.
😎
But head on isn't the best meme perk. It's second best.
Pebble is the best meme perk.
-
@DaGreenBolt said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1019774#Comment_1019774
Man imagine complaining about a balanced killer. The red snared are easy to dodge, the only people who get affected by them are mindless loopers who don't look what's in front of them or the people who don't even wake up.
To be fair - when I face Freddy I don't wake up either. I just look at the bright red things on the ground and it magically registers in my big boy brain "don't step on those".
-
Actually, when you make a claim, it's up to you to prove it right. Now the other way around.
The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi, shortened from Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat) is the obligation on a party in a dispute to provide sufficient warrant for their position.😎
-
@Ultra_Dyce said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1019770#Comment_1019770
And you play freddy instead of an actual killer, what does that say about you? Someone who can't mindgame and probably gets dumped on if you try to play an M1 killer. Keep spamming those snares like a pleb, I am happy they got nerfed.
Spoiler: I don't play Freddy. I'm a survivor main.
When I do play killer, it's Wraith or Trapper. Anything else?
-
@Ultra_Dyce said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1019757#Comment_1019757
There's so many pallets in the game you can get trapped at and snare lusted. Can't dodge the bright obvious red snares when you are stuck looping a car or something and will take a hit if you move off, so then you eat the snares and take a hit eventually anyways.
So you're a mediocre looper who refuses to learn and get better. Gotcha. Could have just said that in short terms instead of a long drawn out sentence.
-
@Ultra_Dyce said:
Oh man, so you need to place some of your snares in advance instead of mindlessly spamming them down at every loop? Freddy trash tier now.
Oh, you couldn't dodge the bright red obvious snares, so they needed to be nerfed because you don't know how to do anything but run around in a circle around the same pallet?
See? I can use that flawed logic too.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
I pray to whatever god exists that its a bug, or I'm going to be very pissed.
We both know it's not a bug.
-
@SunderMun said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1019701#Comment_1019701
They aren't immune. I've had plenty of survivors try that trick on me, and I've been able to counter it.
If they are in the right position, they are in fact immune, unless you are running Oni.
-
@Deadeye said:
There is nothing mentioned in the patch notes. Is this a bug? He somehow is not able to do anything while placing snares until the snare is fully activated. Feels like the delay on doctor after a shock attack. This feels totally different now. Anyone else noticed that? Can we revert that please?
I'd be willing to bet it's an intended shadow nerf. They've been tagged multiple times for comment, and have ignored it. Usually a good sign. Survivors complained, so they nerfed him.
@Peanits @Almo @not_Queen Any comment from any of you?
-
@TragicSolitude said:
You'll see this referred to as "hook tech."
The devs responded to one thread and said they're looking into fixing it, but it'll take time because it's more complicated than expected.
To combat "hook tech" for now, just don't try to hit the survivor hiding under the hook. Stand there and stare at them, and that's two people not doing gens.
Unless you're Oni. You can hit that person with his power.
-
They'll hotfix the hell out of the DS bug. But Freddy's snare bug (and I heard Hag is having issues with something as well?) will take months, like Wraith and Spirit's lunges did. It's only deemed priority if it hurts survivors.
Case and point - the sound issues, not only have they not fixed them after MONTHS, they have yet to even address them directly.
-
@BabyOniMain said:
Pretty sure they nerfed ruin because Survivors were whining about it the most.
But you know killers are the babies I guess.
OOF. Imagine shutting someone down in one sentence like that.
THAT'S gotta hurt.
@Sonzaishinai said:
In the meantime, survivors are mass Dc'ing vs doc again
TOP KEK.
@deadbyhitbox said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1019540#Comment_1019540
I don't see why BT is an issue. Unless you tunnel, you'll hardly ever deal with it.
Except, most killers won't really want to tunnel you off the hook if you get farmed right in front of them. USUALLY what happens is, you get farmed, and they down you and go after the person who farmed you. They do that as a punishment to the unhooker, as it cucks them of benevolence because they didn't get the safe unhook.
-
Indeed. The threads they answer in they tend to ignore the main point of...no answer to the thread about Freddy's snare issue either. Which tells me it was an intentional shadow nerf.
-
@Waffleyumboy said:
I disagree. If you do not contribute properly to the entity's feast why would it reward you.
That's nonsense, based solely on the fact that the opposing side can literally control your ability to pip.
-
@Toybasher said:
The only "Problem" with NOED is the fact it's very hard to keep track of totems outside of SWF.
There should be a way to track how many totems are left.
I've seen MANY ideas how to implement this such as Small Game getting a counter next to it, the counter being base-kit similar to how you can see how many generators are left, a thunder sound playing when the last totem is cleansed (Similar to when an active hex is cleansed), a little shrine in the basement which could have 5 candles which are extinguished with each totem cleansed, making the "Clunk!" noise when a dull totem is cleansed map-wide so survivors have to mentally keep track, etc.
NOED is fine, it's just the fact it's hard to tell if you've found all the totems when playing solo that's frustrating. I've had times where I cleansed 4 dulls, couldn't find the 5th, assumed another survivor must have found it, only to get clapped by NOED. I run Detective's Hunch and it's an excellent anti-totem perk.
Either way I don't think NOED is overpowered. Cheesy and frustrating, sure, but there's plenty of more obnoxious stuff in DBD. Just make it easier to tell when you've got all the totems. I'm probably one of the few survivors who goes out of their way to cleanse dulls (BP, lightbringer emblem points, etc.) and it does feel like other survivors are ignoring dulls.
I play solo exclusively. I rarely get hit by NOED. Because I destroy totems and can count to 5. Besides, you can see a NOED gamer coming from a mile away. If you're even half decent.
That's all I'll say.
-
Destroy totems. NOED can be COMPLETELY prevented.
-
Indeed. They overdid it.
But hey, not getting hooked is more fun for survivors. So why not?
heh, KEKW
-
@wispy6 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018576#Comment_1018576
I think your over exaggertlating it is acturally a fairly good perk especially with survelliance.
Your entire post is invalidated by the fact that it's a hex perk, and those are usually gone 60 seconds into a game. If it wasn't a hex perk, I'd agree with you 100%. It being a hex makes it beyond worthless, and the designers of this change should be ashamed of themselves.
-
Here's a revelation - stop playing fair. If winning is fun for you, play to win. Ultimately, survivors don't give a crap about your fun; and you shouldn't play by their unwritten rule book. Minimize in game chat, kick the living ######### out of them in whatever way you see fit, whether that be tunneling, camping, mori's etc, and go about your day.
-
@Dehitay said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1015870#Comment_1015870
It's not that people can't win without old Ruin. It's that it requires a playstyle that survivors will cry about like crazy.
Oh yes. Crying will be much in the near future.
"Nerf tunneling!"
"Punish campers!"
Nerf Billy and Freddy! They have gen pressure REEEEEE!!"
Oh wait. Already happens.
-
@shwag said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018763#Comment_1018763
Counter he said not failed and had to resort to noob-ed
The only noob part of noed is the survivors who fall victim to it because of their own failure of not cleansing totems.
-
Calm spirit will fall out of the meta in a couple weeks. It's just people being cheeky. I mean, if you know you're going to run against a certain killer for the majority of the time you're playing during a certain period, why wouldn't you run the most optimal kit to go against them?
-
@Aven_Fallen said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018527#Comment_1018527
Honestly, I was mainly replying to the guy above me, but also indicating that OP might also stop because of the Ruin-Change. Should have tagged the guy above me tho.
Fair enough.
-
End game. Hex Ruin.
😂
-
@Waffleyumboy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018414#Comment_1018414
The problem with your statement is the fact dbd is getting more and more money and players. How could that be a sign they're addressing the game's problems improperly?
The problem with your statement is it's only half true. The playerbase has been literally stagnant since about 5 months into it's life cycle. It's not gaining new players if people are also leaving. That's not "gaining" anything.
OBSERVABLE BACKUP TO MY WORDS:
An ongoing analysis of Steam's player numbers, seeing what's been played the most.Dead by Daylight is a multiplayer (4vs1) horror game where one player takes on the role of the savage Killer, and the other four players play as Survivors, trying to escape the Killer and avoid being caught and killed.Two separate sources^^
You of all people should know better than to interject your single-line, baseless comments when replying to me. Show substance and base, cause I will shut that stuff down every single time.
-
@ppo8820 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018527#Comment_1018527
Oh look it’s the user who comes on to berate and belittle people all day. Makes me wonder what your life looks like??? Pretty miserable I’m guessing. Carry on.
I don't actually think you know what berating or belittling people is. I merely pointed out a fact. Someone came in, judged the thread title, didn't actually read the thread, and made a completely unfounded comment.
Apparently telling someone they are wrong and why is "berating" and "belittling".
The dictionary must be mistaken. Damn you to hell, Merriam Webster!
-
@Aven_Fallen said:
Imagine Qutting because one Perk was changed. But talking about Crutch Perks on the Survivor Side.
Yeah, goodbye, but dont forget to change your names ingame, otherwise people might see that you did not quit at all.
(Spoiler: Ruin wasn't mentioned in the OP)
Oh, you mean you didn't read the OP? shocker
-
@Crujoh said:
Operation lobby simulator is a success! 35 mins waiting trying to play survivor now without a single match yet smdh
It was expected.
Lobbies before were 10 minutes or so...and killers said they would leave when the ruin changes went live...
...ruin changes go live....lobbies queues triple in time, for survivors....meanwhile killer queues are instant.
But no, it must be matchmaking. There's no way the most logical thing that could have caused the problem actually caused said problem. 🤣
-
@Dr_Loomis said:
But we got fireworks on the menu screen! WOOZERS!!!! 😂
Yes, the most annoying part of the event..that part still exists.
-
You're playing killer. You're not supposed to be having fun. This is DBD, or did you forget?
😎
-
@Seltas0208 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018442#Comment_1018442
I mean. They straight up nerfed snap out of it.
It's basicly deep wounds but without a red bar. I'd make a joke about lethality but deep wounds doesn't have any
They did do that, yeah...but his anti loop potential is actually higher now. So I'll take that trade off.
-
@Waffleyumboy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018396#Comment_1018396
Yes buffing doc was exercising survivor priority.
It wasn't a buff, or a nerf. It suits a different and more productive playstyle, and they didn't do him wrong, but he remains about the same on the tier list. So that's irrelevant. Especially when the changes were made for the sake of survivors.
-
@AlecSander said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018400#Comment_1018400
anything but this game.If nobody plays,maybe they’ll balance it.Who am i kidding,that won’t happen.
Our only hope is the new Predator and Resident Evil asymmetrical games. It will be the first time BHVR has been challenged by a real studio of the AAA variety. Perhaps it will make them pull their heads out of their asses.
-
Because it's LeSs fRuStRaTiNg To gO aGaInSt
-
Indeed. They can deny it all they want, but survivors are their priority, and what do you expect, really? Survivors complain about anything that kills them. "Freddy OP. Billy OP"
Survivor bias is strong. We'll see how long that lasts. 😎
-
I think it's safe to say if they stay silent on it and avoid talking about it, it was intentional. So we'll see.
-
Wouldn't surprise me; would like confirmation though. @not_Queen @Peanits
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGHymTuX0_U@TheGameZpro3 said:
What if the next tome focuses on Adam, and Ace for survivors.
Then also focuses on Anna (The Huntress) and Adiris (The Plague) for killers.
And the Tome will be called "The A-Team".
-
@PapiQuentin_ said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018149#Comment_1018149
Ace could have a lot going for him.
Meg or Kate? Sure.
Killers tho?
Wraith or Billy.
Then either Hag, Nurse or Huntress?
I'd say for killers it will be Billy. Rumor has it, he's not fun to play against and he's next on the chopping block.
-
@BigFudge said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018120#Comment_1018120
Totally agree! Scrapping events altogether and replacing it with the rift was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Trying to maximize profits (for nothing more than average cosmetics) and at the same time putting as little effort into the gameplay as possible isnt a good sign
Indeed. You can tell it's going south when the game is nearly 4 years old and they are still catering to new players as the sole reason for balance changes in patches.
-
@VoodooChild said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018132#Comment_1018132
I just want to point out whenever anyone talks about Adam not getting ######### they bring up Claudette lol.
I dont got nothing to say about it I just think its funny 😂
I don't see how that's relevant, but okay.
-
@PapiQuentin_ said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018132#Comment_1018132
Not Yui. No way.
She's already had an outfit and a sweater since release. And another outfit next week.
Yui is fine.
Tome 3 will probably contain either Ace, Jeff or Adam
Perhaps. Though, I'd say it will be a male character and a female character, and I think we both agree it's probably going to be Ace as the male character for Tome 3. Kate or Meg are a strong possibility IMO
-
Are you the type of person who avoids someone with a VAC ban from like 8 years ago?
In any case, the only UI update I want is a scale-able UI. I want to be able to make my UI elements smaller on my screen.
-
Or, it could be about the number of characters in game that are older, and more popular than Adam.
Claudette is SUPER popular, as are Jane and David. I'd be willing to bet Ace and either Kate or Yui are next in the list.
-
@BigFudge said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018084#Comment_1018084
Im not 100% sure to be honest. I know the Predator character is a HUGE attraction, one many people on these forums have asked to see in DbD for years.
I dont know much about RE:R yet but there is quite a bit of hype surrounding it so far.
Indeed. Predator is a huge attraction...and when it comes to Resident Evil...those devs have been hitting it out of the park for a good while now, so if I were BHVR, I'd step up my game. Though, I think people are right when they know they are on borrowed time and are planning for the short term to make as much cash as possible.
-
@BigFudge said:
I feel like if a genuine competitor in the asymmetrical horror genre emerges then DbD will suffer hugely. Predator: Hunting Grounds and Resident Evil: Resistance are both around the corner so time will tell
Which if I'm not mistaken would be the first time a AAA studio would be throwing their hat in the ring against BHVR.
-
This should be an interesting little research project.
-
Nothing you can really do.
They don't like new Doc, they don't think he's fun to go against. So they'll DC and complain until he gets nerfed.
-
@USELESS said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1018020#Comment_1018020
I don't think, also I only play on keyboard so I don't know exactly
Literally, on controller all you have to do is hold the movement stick one way, and turn the other one in the opposite direction.