Ramxenoc445

@koopazepam said:
Why don't I rank up if I camp? Do I really have to suffer these sweaty survivors who play as if their life depended on it? Do I really have to chase them and have them T-bag me after they complete a vault? Do I really have to chase these freaks who want to get chased in a loop? Why do they get rewarded for playing like jackasses but killers don't? Regardless of your position on camping, it should not get punished like this.

@Almo said:
This doesn't exactly address the OP, but it's on-topic, and I felt there should be a concise explanation of where we feel camping sits in the game.
It's up to Survivors to punish camping. When I camp, if nobody comes for the rescue, I stop because I'm losing ground. But when they come running, even if they don't rush the hook and just hang around and they're not repairing while the one on the hook is dying, I'm still profiting.
It is true that the Emblem system does not look favorably upon camping... but the best way to stop it to not to reward it.
I know all the arguments and counter arguments about it; I've heard them over and over. :)
One of DbD's core values is "player agency". We want players to have as much input on what happens in matches as possible. Eliminating camping as a strategy removes choice from both the Killer and the Survivors; it limits gameplay possibilities. Deciding to do gens instead of rescuing the one being camped is a moral decision: choosing the good of the many over the good of the one. Sometimes, the Survivors choose the good of the one over the good of the many; when they do, they often suffer dire consequences. But all of that arises from player choice.
I will not say "camping is good gameplay in DbD" as many construe my comments to mean. But the possibility, the choice leading to it, and the choices it requires Survivors to make are all part of what makes the game great: player agency. Removing those choices only reduces the range of decisions to make, which isn't good in the long run.
We have experimented extensively with anti-camping measures. In the end, the result was always that the camper just camped harder, or we had to break fundamental systems to accomodate the anti-camping measure.

All I want is for NOED to gain an extra requirement to punish camping killers that use NOED. It doesn't feel fair that they camp two people to death and then get the other two because noed was granted free. Just make it require all four survs to be hooked once or it works only on hooked players. In normal games without camping the perk would still function as it should assuming everyone is hooked once and it still punishes survs for not doing totems. Also to OP if you rank up from camping you'll just get harder survivors to catch anyway and if you're not leatherface or wraith I bring borrowed time just to piss people like you off and do my best to make sure you get zero kills because camping is scum and camping to secure that 1 person kill is just pathetic in my eyes

in You will PLAY OUR WAY! Comment by Ramxenoc445 December 18, 2020

@SunaIIanu said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1823393#Comment_1823393
I don't want to be rude either, but there are multiple people in this discussion who have the same problem, so I doubt it's just senki527's problem.

I saw some solutions people offered so it seemed legit

in 63 mb update, 40 days to install Comment by Ramxenoc445 December 18, 2020

@senki527 said:
good job devs, every time a little update comes out, it takes forever to install it.
dbd is the only game, where i'm having such problems lol

Sounds like a you problem. Have never had this happen even when I played on console.

EDIT: Not meaning to be an ######### sorry it def sounds like it

in 63 mb update, 40 days to install Comment by Ramxenoc445 December 17, 2020

@OldHunterLight said:
Was that a console doctor, that lag looks familiar, he also bms at hooks right?

Not that I saw he didn't bm unless I never noticed