Tsulan
Tsulan
About
- Username
- Tsulan
- Joined
- Visits
- 14,849
- Last Active
Comments
-
@FSB75 said:
Camping is just a sign that the game is in pretty good balance.As a gaming strategy, camping says ONE thing: I don't trust myself as a Killer to catch anyone else this round.
Sounds strange I admit. But think about it. Killer would never camp if catching all survivors was 100% guaranteed. They would just move on to the next survivor, knowing they will eventually get everyone. And even if it's NOT true, they would do so if that was their attitude.
So yeah, people may camp for personal reasons, like teabagging, or looping.
Here's a truth, for killer that care about rank....they just want to at least get 2 kills out of the way, so they can sit back and actually enjoy the rest of the match.
Some killers just find enjoyment out of the fact that survivors take is personal. I'd be willing to bet, that the day there is not another word said about camping, the amount of camping would decrease dramatically.
The game is balanced, and camping proves this. If killers were OP, there would be no need to camp, ever.
What about survivors being OP?
Because right now, survivors ARE OP. -
@Siggerad said:
Way to BIAS; now BBQ&Chili is weak perk? LOLA perk that reduces camping should be a survivors wet dream.
But somehow it isn´t.
Maybe survivors really prefer to get insidious camped. Who knows? -
@brokedownpalace said:
Pros: None
Cons: AllThis is an absurd suggestion.
Why is this absurd?
Please give me a reason. Because i already explained that right now a high rank match takes 3 minutes or less with 4 survivors. Only when 3 survivors start, the match takes significantly longer and is more enjoyable for all parties. Since it´s not just the gen repair simulator for 3 minutes. -
@MineAntoiya said:
@Nick said:
Would need some good testing whether that would be OP or not. I think it's an idea to be considered.
What is there OP?
Right now the killer has a 2 second time window, between the gate opening and survivors escaping.
That´s way to short. -
Care to explain why?
-
@Nick said:
It should start blocking as soon as an exit gate opens if you hooked someone after the last gen popped. So you dont have to time it like you have to do now.For example
Or make it activatable by pressing a button. -
@altruistic said:
Gamers will camp you regardless. Doesn’t matter how strong the Killer is.Good thing you said gamers instead of killers. I´ve seen a ton of survivors camping. It´s really disgusting.
But i agree, that killers need to be actually way stronger, to make the game enjoyable and thus reduce camping.Since killers camp, because they feel to weak to go for another victim. They want to secure the kill that cost them 3 gens.
-
Challenge accepted.Peanits said:With some practice, you can be just as effective with most killers.
Except wraith/Freddy. That's hard mode.
-
I'm currently trying to reach rank 1 using Freddy only. Went from rank 11 to rank 6. Yesterday I had 3 double pips in a row. I'm optimistic that I can reach rank 1 with him.Techn0 said:It's possible to rank with every killer, just much harder with some of them. I'd advise you avoid wraith, trapper and, Freddy at the moment but everybody else is fair game. Personally I've found great success with piggy for ranking up because she can stop gen-rush by a bit.
Bonus: the salt of losing against Freddy is really delicious. -
Currently I'm trying to reach rank 1 playing only Freddy. Started at rank 11 and reached rank 6 now.
I'm using BBQ, M&A, NOED and Blood Warden.
I might throw out Blood Warden thought, because survivors rush out once the gate is open.
I break a lot of chases and try to keep everyone asleep. With M&A I can come back and get them, when they don't expect it. -
Currently I'm trying to reach rank 1 with him. I started at rank 11, only play him and now I reached rank 6. He requires a completely different play style. I break a lot of chases and go for someone else mid chase. Since he has his aura reading, he can afford to break the chase.
I'm not using Ruin. If I let them loop, I'll lose at least 2 gens. He definitely needs some buffs. Especially to how dark the dreamworld is.
But I'm optimistic that I can reach rank 1. -
@BOSS242 said:
Tsulan said:
Runiver said:@Gorillastache said:
As someone who plays a decent amount of both sides, I can say I hate the hatch as either side. As a killer it just feels so bad to kill 2 and down a 3rd while they still have 3 gens up and know that if you hook you're probably just going to let the other one get away despite wrecking them. In addition, hatch stand offs are so stupid. You just [BAD WORD] stand in one spot hoping you see the survivor sneaking up and can get lucky enough to time it so you can grab them out of it.
As a survivor it creates such a toxic environment. I can't say how maddening it is to get put on a hook with two already dead and see the other guy just sitting in a [BAD WORD] closet by the hatch because that's what's going to get him the most points. It's equally as frustrating to have to sit there and wait while the slow as ######### bleed out timer ticks down. If we didn't get the gens done than we don't deserve to escape. Simple as that. The worst part is it's worth more than escaping regularly. It's like you get rewarded for getting your ass kicked with a bonus 2500 bp.
The hatch is just toxic for everyone involved and should really be removed from the game. I know they are working on changes for it but just remove it entirely. It's not hard to get the gates open if your team has any idea what they are doing. The game is already survivor favored. And if they don't then that's part of a team game. Sometimes you get ######### teammates. Die and move on or rank up so they are at least semi-competent.
I disagree.
The hatch as you state is exactly as it should be : an easier escape for the one letting you to die.
It's the original concept of the game, when the game wasn't a scoobydoo fest of altruism like it is now. (Even tho it had HUGE flaws before too, but it wasn't in the concept, it was in the mecanics)
They're just turning dbd into a stupid teamgame, while the original idea is to make survivors to have to cooperate until it's not necessary anymore, and to let someone else to die in order to get an easier escape for yourself.
And yes, it's sort of "toxic", but it's the original concept of the game : either you take the risk of saving (and put yourself at a stake, which is why it's so heavily rewarding to save), or you just repair and eventually let die to get the hatch/exit gates.
The main issue comes from the fact that the game is turning into a teamgame, especially with the omnipresence of SWF, and the already clear advantage survivors do have, which is rather unrelated to the hatch itself.
As a killer, I don't mind the last one getting away. I just dislike the eventual hatch stand-off, but I usually simply hit and accept it.
Right now, the devs don't know what to do with the hatch.
My proposal was to:- remove the hatch. (Most people stopped reading after this)
- remove the gen regression during this stage
- give the last survivor a bonus to repair speed
This way, the last survivor still has a chance. He has to work for that escape, but it's not a free escape like the hatch.
The killer would win every time! This could work if you also stop showing which gen is being worked or remove gen aura from the killer. If all you have to do is patrol gens until you find the one being worked that's too easy.
A few weeks ago i tested Left Behind. Had a match where 3 survivors died with 4 gens to do.
I managed to 99% 3 gens. Then the killer caught me, when i popped the first of them. It would require some adaptation. But it wouldn´t be impossible.
The repair bonus of Left Behind really helped a lot. I repaired for 30 seconds then switched. -
@Cetren said:
Tsulan said:@Cetren said:
Tsulan said:
I agree. Hatch shouldn´t even be in the game. It rewards failiure. Also there is currently no mechanic in the game, that kills the last survivor, if all 4 are about to escape.
This I disagree with. Survivors aren't a team. They're success is individual. If it was rewarding failure, it would be rewarding the already sacrificed survivors. As the survivor still alive fire the hatch, you're the only one besides the killer that has succeeded or has a chance of success. The hatch is a way of rewarding the best, most stealthy, or smartest survivor of the game when generators are no longer a viable way to escape.
So that guy that escaped with 9000 bps.
Do you think he was the best and smartest survivor for the match?
Either that or the luckiest. Either way, he's the one that made it out. Also if he escaped his score would be 16,000 not 9,000.
No, no i mean a real 9000 bps at his end screen. He got 7000 for doing the hatch and had barely 2000 before that.
So again, does this survivor deserve the free escape? -
@Cetren said:
Tsulan said:I agree. Hatch shouldn´t even be in the game. It rewards failiure.
Also there is currently no mechanic in the game, that kills the last survivor, if all 4 are about to escape.
This I disagree with. Survivors aren't a team. They're success is individual. If it was rewarding failure, it would be rewarding the already sacrificed survivors. As the survivor still alive fire the hatch, you're the only one besides the killer that has succeeded or has a chance of success. The hatch is a way of rewarding the best, most stealthy, or smartest survivor of the game when generators are no longer a viable way to escape.
So that guy that escaped with 9000 bps.
Do you think he was the best and smartest survivor for the match? -
9gag.com/gag/a6oxxp8
Just leaving this here -
@Cypraz said:
Camper detected You know exactly why BT exists!If the killer is on the map, he´s a camper
-
@popoles said:
Tsulan said:
Runiver said:@Gorillastache said:
As someone who plays a decent amount of both sides, I can say I hate the hatch as either side. As a killer it just feels so bad to kill 2 and down a 3rd while they still have 3 gens up and know that if you hook you're probably just going to let the other one get away despite wrecking them. In addition, hatch stand offs are so stupid. You just [BAD WORD] stand in one spot hoping you see the survivor sneaking up and can get lucky enough to time it so you can grab them out of it.
As a survivor it creates such a toxic environment. I can't say how maddening it is to get put on a hook with two already dead and see the other guy just sitting in a [BAD WORD] closet by the hatch because that's what's going to get him the most points. It's equally as frustrating to have to sit there and wait while the slow as ######### bleed out timer ticks down. If we didn't get the gens done than we don't deserve to escape. Simple as that. The worst part is it's worth more than escaping regularly. It's like you get rewarded for getting your ass kicked with a bonus 2500 bp.
The hatch is just toxic for everyone involved and should really be removed from the game. I know they are working on changes for it but just remove it entirely. It's not hard to get the gates open if your team has any idea what they are doing. The game is already survivor favored. And if they don't then that's part of a team game. Sometimes you get ######### teammates. Die and move on or rank up so they are at least semi-competent.
I disagree.
The hatch as you state is exactly as it should be : an easier escape for the one letting you to die.
It's the original concept of the game, when the game wasn't a scoobydoo fest of altruism like it is now. (Even tho it had HUGE flaws before too, but it wasn't in the concept, it was in the mecanics)
They're just turning dbd into a stupid teamgame, while the original idea is to make survivors to have to cooperate until it's not necessary anymore, and to let someone else to die in order to get an easier escape for yourself.
And yes, it's sort of "toxic", but it's the original concept of the game : either you take the risk of saving (and put yourself at a stake, which is why it's so heavily rewarding to save), or you just repair and eventually let die to get the hatch/exit gates.
The main issue comes from the fact that the game is turning into a teamgame, especially with the omnipresence of SWF, and the already clear advantage survivors do have, which is rather unrelated to the hatch itself.
As a killer, I don't mind the last one getting away. I just dislike the eventual hatch stand-off, but I usually simply hit and accept it.
Right now, the devs don't know what to do with the hatch.
My proposal was to:- remove the hatch. (Most people stopped reading after this)
- remove the gen regression during this stage
- give the last survivor a bonus to repair speed
This way, the last survivor still has a chance. He has to work for that escape, but it's not a free escape like the hatch.
But then the perk Left Behind would be useless. (It is useless as of now, but you know...)
It could stack
-
@Chi said:
@Tsulan said:
@Nick said:
@Tsulan said:
I agree. Hatch shouldn´t even be in the game. It rewards failiure.
Also there is currently no mechanic in the game, that kills the last survivor, if all 4 are about to escape.Decisive strike, unbreakable and NOED also reward failure, but I get your point. Hatch needs to go.
NOED is a double edged blade.
It can be easily prevented by destroying all dull totems. But it punishes gen rushers.I´ve had so many matches where 1 player afk´d during the whole match and only escaped through the hatch with 9000 BPs. He didnt deserve to escape. He didn´t helped his team. He wasn´t productive at all.
Often, one of the last 2 survivors camps the hatch and let´s his teammate die. When only 2 are alive, both basically search for the hatch and hope that the other one dies first.Punishing survivors for literally completing the only objective in game. Lol.
Survivors complained that gens are the only objective.
Devs introduced totems.
Survivors complain that they get punished for doing gens only. -
Right now, the devs don't know what to do with the hatch.Runiver said:@Gorillastache said:
As someone who plays a decent amount of both sides, I can say I hate the hatch as either side. As a killer it just feels so bad to kill 2 and down a 3rd while they still have 3 gens up and know that if you hook you're probably just going to let the other one get away despite wrecking them. In addition, hatch stand offs are so stupid. You just [BAD WORD] stand in one spot hoping you see the survivor sneaking up and can get lucky enough to time it so you can grab them out of it.As a survivor it creates such a toxic environment. I can't say how maddening it is to get put on a hook with two already dead and see the other guy just sitting in a [BAD WORD] closet by the hatch because that's what's going to get him the most points. It's equally as frustrating to have to sit there and wait while the slow as ######### bleed out timer ticks down. If we didn't get the gens done than we don't deserve to escape. Simple as that. The worst part is it's worth more than escaping regularly. It's like you get rewarded for getting your ass kicked with a bonus 2500 bp.
The hatch is just toxic for everyone involved and should really be removed from the game. I know they are working on changes for it but just remove it entirely. It's not hard to get the gates open if your team has any idea what they are doing. The game is already survivor favored. And if they don't then that's part of a team game. Sometimes you get ######### teammates. Die and move on or rank up so they are at least semi-competent.
I disagree.
The hatch as you state is exactly as it should be : an easier escape for the one letting you to die.
It's the original concept of the game, when the game wasn't a scoobydoo fest of altruism like it is now. (Even tho it had HUGE flaws before too, but it wasn't in the concept, it was in the mecanics)They're just turning dbd into a stupid teamgame, while the original idea is to make survivors to have to cooperate until it's not necessary anymore, and to let someone else to die in order to get an easier escape for yourself.
And yes, it's sort of "toxic", but it's the original concept of the game : either you take the risk of saving (and put yourself at a stake, which is why it's so heavily rewarding to save), or you just repair and eventually let die to get the hatch/exit gates.The main issue comes from the fact that the game is turning into a teamgame, especially with the omnipresence of SWF, and the already clear advantage survivors do have, which is rather unrelated to the hatch itself.
As a killer, I don't mind the last one getting away. I just dislike the eventual hatch stand-off, but I usually simply hit and accept it.
My proposal was to:
- remove the hatch. (Most people stopped reading after this)
- remove the gen regression during this stage
- give the last survivor a bonus to repair speed
This way, the last survivor still has a chance. He has to work for that escape, but it's not a free escape like the hatch. -
@Nick said:
@Tsulan said:
I agree. Hatch shouldn´t even be in the game. It rewards failiure.
Also there is currently no mechanic in the game, that kills the last survivor, if all 4 are about to escape.Decisive strike, unbreakable and NOED also reward failure, but I get your point. Hatch needs to go.
NOED is a double edged blade.
It can be easily prevented by destroying all dull totems. But it punishes gen rushers.I´ve had so many matches where 1 player afk´d during the whole match and only escaped through the hatch with 9000 BPs. He didnt deserve to escape. He didn´t helped his team. He wasn´t productive at all.
Often, one of the last 2 survivors camps the hatch and let´s his teammate die. When only 2 are alive, both basically search for the hatch and hope that the other one dies first. -
@Runiver said:
@MagV3 said:
You guys have camping stuck right up your ass, never did I even mention anything about camping yet it k> @Runiver said:@MagV3 said:
Right, except for when survivor 1 takes the hit, survivor 2 and 3 are body blocking and then prevent you from hitting the unhooker the 2nd time.Then it's called teamplay. You can totally hit the rescuer twice, once before he unhooks, then after he unhooks, in most cases. If they actually manage to prevent that, they did decent teamplay.
For how dedicated you are on these forums, did not expect for you to be a survivor apologist. The discussion is pretty over, I'm just going to go ahead and start running NOED. Once a lot of the aforementioned Q&A nerfs come into play and once surviving isn't brain dead easy with very little danger or stress to actually prevent yourself from getting a pip then maybe some of these situations won't pop up anymore.
Camping wasn't done in this game by the way, which is why they all 4 escaped. If I had camped I'm sure 2 kills easily could've been secured. But the killers too often play nice and by the survivor rules. Just found the situation pretty OP and came to share what just went down. I get it though, theres 4 survivors to every 1 killer, they're all deathly afraid for the game to get balanced and it will always be an uphill battle for the killers as 80% of the population are on the survivors side for continuously having easy game experiences. They're so incredibly scared that they even talk trash to perkless first time killers, its like they're complaining the game wasn't EASY enough for them. Pathetic.
I'm not a "survivor apologist", I just accept that some power is awarded by perks, as it should be, if they're used at the right moment and the right timing.
I also don't see any issue with you using NOED. NOED is a fine perks, with counters as well.If you choose to deliberately not camp everytime, you do not play killer optimally. It's your own fault for not getting optimal results if you force yourself into "hard mode", because you looked for it. The best way to snowball in the game as killer is to be non-readable. To camp at times, to not camp at times, to stay in between and push people away sometimes, just to be time wasting and hard to read. If you systematically "don't camp because you're fair", you're just playing with a handicap, and it's your own fault for losing, mostly because survivors managed to make you feel bad about camping, or because you do not have the kind of patience to come back at a hook and expect results from it.
I'm not saying the game isn't survivor sided tho, I'm just saying BT is rather fine, as perks should be useful but not overly strong, and I think BT is fine now, unless perks such as SB/DS.
You're quite drifting from the original subject to make your point now, but saying "Hey, the game is survivor sided, so X" to justify anything you dislike doesn't do any good.
I agree 100%
The old BT was to strong. It gave both survivors the 15 second shield. Allowing for braindead hook rushes.
Now survivors have to at least think a second, before rushing for the hook.A good killer knows when to camp and when not to camp. You can´t win all games.
-
@CaptRedbeerd said:
I love this game. One thing that i really love is the way you can unlock med kits, toolboxes, and flashlights. I also like to unlock the best add ons in the blood web and save them up. That way once i get the best tool box, med kit, or flashlight, I can match them up with the best of the best add ons! BUT! Then I get into a match and 2 of my team mates disconnect from the weak signal of the killer host... And Im in a game that is lagging badly. And I die and lose all my stuff that Ive saved. It feels super bad when you try to equip yourself with the good stuff but then the connection screws you. I know there is some system in place that makes it so there are less generators in an event that some survivors disconnect, but I think it would be a great idea to make it where my items and add ons are not lost when Im left by my team mates in a laggy game. Or at least set up a system where you can give the remaining survivors the opportunity to leave the game with no repercussions, in the event of a disconnect. I appreciate the opportunity to voice my opinion, thank you.Equip white ward and make sure to die while carrying your precious items.
-
@PinkEricka said:
I’ve absolutely never seen anything so ridiculous than this petty fued. PC players are always talking trash to console players all because they play on a different platform than them, LMAO.When I go to Twitter or check the forums, all I see from half the PC players are:
”console is trash”
”we’re waiting on your trash console so we can get the shrine back”
”stop whining about not getting the 2.0 update, you should’ve gotten a PC”I am going to say this in the most respectful manner I can.
Just because you are playing on a different platform than somebody else does not make you in any way superior to them. May I remind you that Dead By Daylight is just a GAME where we are all meant to have fun.
If they play on a different platform than you, it doesn’t give you the right to curse them out or brag about how the platform you’re playing on is better than theirs. Almost every game that starts on PC ends up expanding their content to console. We are ALL playing the SAME game, just because they’re not sitting behind a computer playing it doesn’t mean they’re not playing the same s h i t as you. Accept the fact that not everyone can afford a high end PC or that they just preferably prefer to play on console.
Get over it and grow up. You look pathetic as ######### cursing people out and bragging all because they play on a different platform than you.
I agree.
We shouldn´t rage or insult others because they play the same game on a different platform. -
I agree. Hatch shouldn´t even be in the game. It rewards failiure.
Also there is currently no mechanic in the game, that kills the last survivor, if all 4 are about to escape. -
@MagV3 said:
@Jack11803 said:
@MagV3 said:
@Jack11803 said:
@MagV3If you are camping, do it right. If not, do it right. How’d activate BT, and escape? Did you move away from the hook and nearest exit while staying close enough?
Yea I'll do it right next time. I'll just play like an #########. Appreciate the great forums, making dead by daylight players more awesome day after day. Could've just been like 'yea that sounds #########' it doesn't usually happen like that. Its not something that can always be replicated'.
Nah instead, 'git gud noob'. Fk I feel sorry for people that don't actually watch videos or try to better themselves. Once the ranks reset and you get these good survivors at 20, new players must just uninstall. I'm not the greatest, but I'm miles above the average player and this ######### frustrates so, just take it up the arse.
And your temperament is below average. I never said you had to camp. You either camp, or don’t. You don’t walk the line in between. You triggered BT, but weren’t camping, what the hell were you doing that close, and not near the gate then?
Stupid comments dwindled my temperament. Also some people just have a different vocabulary. Maybe I'm more passionate about some things, doesn't make my experience any less valid. I'm done, just going to adjust my play style as I said for killer. And keep breezing through survivor ranks.
Your understanding of newer players is also below average. Or your compassion, so fk you!
At this point this is meant more like a jest. So don't get too buttprickled at this one.Please don´t insult others, when you run out of arguments.
When the gates are open and all 4 are still alive, there isn´t much else to do for the killer, unless he planned for this situation by using NOED, Remember me and Blood warden.
BT will get the last survivor from the hook, no matter how you play in this situation. If all 3 go for the unhook, you are screwed. Unless you play with Leatherface or Myers you can´t defend the hook against a skilled SWF group. Accept it, and go for the next match.
Yes, it sucks. But that´s how the game works right now.
Yes, its unbalanced. But the devs are changing this. Slowly but at least they are aware of the problems to some degree. -
@The_Manlet said:
Borrowed Time was added to remove the killer's power at the hook and incentivize not even bothering to stay near the hook and just allowing free unhooks. Every single player who had it was running it. Afterwards it got reworked to a perk that is mostly just for farming with WGLF with a clear conscience and getting your buddy out after the gates are open.Pretty much this.
-
The reason why killers tunnel the first guy to death, is simple. He wants to have a fair chance to win. As long as 4 survivors are alive, the gens get done to quickly. With 3 survivors, the game slows considerably down.
If it wouldn't take survivors 3 minutes to finish all gens, then the killer might go easier on the survivors. But on high ranks? By the time he hooked the first one, 3 gens are done. -
People can play on both systems.chefdave12118 said:I'm 42 (old, but not really old) and my hand to God I have dbd on our PC (with the clown and Kate) and dbd on my PS4 and maybe it's because I grew up with controllers and consoles, but I have way more fun playing on my PS4 .Just my opinion . Obviously others feel differently, but I have some hours on the PC with dbd and over a thousand hours on my PS4 . Just the way my brain is wired I guess . I could of been playing the update for weeks on the PC, but only bought the clown and Kate and spending the rest on the PS4 update .
There's really only a "war" because some games are only available on a certain platform. And no one can really afford to have all platforms to play all the games. So people get jealous and salty. -
I loved soul reaver!Noodle said:God do I miss Soul Reaver… picked it up on PC but it's not a good port, really hard to play.
I wish they would have done something similar with kain. But his other games were just trash. -
If you farm, you get them.Shadoureon said:@Tsulan said:
Imagine the possibilities:
30k base BPs + 30k double bp weekend + 30k WGLF/BBQ + 5x bloody party streamers = 240k BPs from a single match!So i would recommend everyone, when there are several bloody party streamers active. Show a heart to your fellow survivors and killers and keep the match alive for as long as possible. Everyone is a winner!
Btw. I don´t think Farming is bannable. (but this might need an official confirmation)
You'll never get 30000 from BBQ and WGLF. That would require 4 stacks before doing anything.
But 4 stacks is not that hard. -
I scared my mother with the moving controller during the psycho mantis fight.Jack11803 said:@Tsulan said:
@JP_Cloud said:
Tsulan said:@JP_Cloud said:
Nah. I can’t understand playing with a keyboard and mouse when i can do everything with a controller plus i can’t relax on my couch with a drink playing a PC
I don´t want to troll, but everything you mentioned, can be done on the pc awell.
But i can understand that it´s easier to plug and play.
I still have my PS1, 2 and 3
You go that far back too! What was your first PS1 game? FF7 for me and MGS
My first was Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain, i think. But i also had FF7, MGS, Crash Bandicot, Tomb Raider, Diablo, etc. Ahh the memories.
MGS gave my square button PTSD
-
@JP_Cloud said:
Tsulan said:@JP_Cloud said:
Nah. I can’t understand playing with a keyboard and mouse when i can do everything with a controller plus i can’t relax on my couch with a drink playing a PC
I don´t want to troll, but everything you mentioned, can be done on the pc awell.
But i can understand that it´s easier to plug and play.
I still have my PS1, 2 and 3
You go that far back too! What was your first PS1 game? FF7 for me and MGS
My first was Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain, i think. But i also had FF7, MGS, Crash Bandicot, Tomb Raider, Diablo, etc. Ahh the memories.
-
30k base BPs + 30k double bp weekend + 30k WGLF/BBQ + 5x bloody party streamers = 240k BPs from a single match!
-
@SadonicShadow said:
@Tsulan said:
Imagine the possibilities:
30k base BPs + 30k double bp weekend + 30k WGLF/BBQ + 5x bloody party streamers = 240k BPs from a single match!So i would recommend everyone, when there are several bloody party streamers active. Show a heart to your fellow survivors and killers and keep the match alive for as long as possible. Everyone is a winner!
Btw. I don´t think Farming is bannable. (but this might need an official confirmation)
From what i know farming is not bannable. Typically i like to set my steam name to farming killer on double BP weeks and add everyone in my lobby and we all have a jolly good time getting tons of points.
Omg that´s a Brilliant Idea!
-
@Mringasa said:
@Tsulan said:
Imagine the possibilities:
30k base BPs + 30k double bp weekend + 30k WGLF/BBQ + 5x bloody party streamers = 240k BPs from a single match!So i would recommend everyone, when there are several bloody party streamers active. Show a heart to your fellow survivors and killers and keep the match alive for as long as possible. Everyone is a winner!
Btw. I don´t think Farming is bannable. (but this might need an official confirmation)
Only if it's reported I think. Otherwise it's more of a wink and nudge thing. Just have to be fair and don't exclude someone. That is definitely bannable since it'd be a case of 3 Survivors working with the Killer against 1 Survivor.
Of course. No one excluded. No rush to kill, no gen rush.
-
Imagine the possibilities:
30k base BPs + 30k double bp weekend + 30k WGLF/BBQ + 5x bloody party streamers = 240k BPs from a single match!So i would recommend everyone, when there are several bloody party streamers active. Show a heart to your fellow survivors and killers and keep the match alive for as long as possible. Everyone is a winner!
Btw. I don´t think Farming is bannable. (but this might need an official confirmation)
-
@SovererignKing said:
Grew up on console, will stay there. As a Killer, I’ll invite you to take the challenge and play on console with harder controls and lower FPS.Nah, i´m fine. Thank you.
Have fun tho! -
@JP_Cloud said:
Nah. I can’t understand playing with a keyboard and mouse when i can do everything with a controller plus i can’t relax on my couch with a drink playing a PCI don´t want to troll, but everything you mentioned, can be done on the pc awell.
But i can understand that it´s easier to plug and play.I still have my PS1, 2 and 3
-
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:
@ThePloopz said: Tsulan said:
Then why did you guys rage so hard?!
We had threats, insults, some guy stalking Not_Queen on her private stream, calls for money compensations, etc. All while the devs still were within their deadline. I never asked for money, cells, or shards. I never stalked or gave a damn about not queen. Couldn't care less about her hot/not or her stream. Many of us were upset about being forgotten and since you are not on the PS4 you have no idea what it is like trying to find lobbies just to do dailys. Less people are/were playing either in revolt or because they were capped or because no new content since January. If you look at PS4 compensation all i asked was that all future chapter dlc be released at the same time. I´ve been around when survivors had 45+ minute queues for 1 match, last year. So i know how hard it is to wait. But people like @ThePloopz just liked to rage and ramble about how unfair life has treated them, because he had to wait for a freaking patch.
Are you still salty about how I made you look dumb in our last conversation? Also if I was raging and upset give me quotes. Now if you want to embarrass yourself again I don’t mind Here is the comment that started your rage: @ThePloopz said: Tsulan said:
Tizzle said: Shards on console have been capped at 1k since early June with the same perks in the shrine. PS4 players will not get the double bloodpoint event without an update. I'd say the complaints are justified. Has a dev confirmed that you won't get the double BPs weekend?
I heard they can’t do it without a patch idk how true that is though So again, you heard they can´t do it without a patch, but you don´t know how true that is. I asked you for something official but you started to make strange claims. Do you really think they go through all this without having the BP event already coded into the actual patch that went live for ps4 and xbox? That they´ll launch another patch?
No no bring up what actually happened. You started making comments that didn’t make sense and I called you out on it you realized you were being stupid so you tried to cover it up and changed the subject. Now read my comments on this thread alone none of them are rage and most are jokes. This is a pathetic attempt at saying I was raging. Anybody who saw my comments during this wait knows I was not raging at all and I have many many comments. If you really want to get into this we can and I’ll make you look stupid again.
You mean the uncle of your neighbor thing?
That was actually being sarcastic. I really have to make a sarcasm sign for my comments.
But i don´t want to start a fight. So please accept my appologies if i have triggered or baited you or hurt your feelings or anything else.
All is good.
I invite you on a beer if you want (and have the age to drink).
No I actually wasn’t talking about that comment but good try. Earlier you wanted to make these bold claims about me,now you realize you can’t and want to stop the conversation. Lol gotta love it
Then please, for the love of god, link me my comment. Because i have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
I really thought you meant the uncle thing.I take it that you don´t accept my appologies.
-
@Tizzle said:
@Tsulan said:
@Tizzle said:
@Tsulan said:
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:@fcc2014 said:
@Tsulan said:
Then why did you guys rage so hard?!
We had threats, insults, some guy stalking Not_Queen on her private stream, calls for money compensations, etc. All while the devs still were within their deadline.
I never asked for money, cells, or shards. I never stalked or gave a damn about not queen. Couldn't care less about her hot/not or her stream. Many of us were upset about being forgotten and since you are not on the PS4 you have no idea what it is like trying to find lobbies just to do dailys. Less people are/were playing either in revolt or because they were capped or because no new content since January. If you look at PS4 compensation all i asked was that all future chapter dlc be released at the same time.
I´ve been around when survivors had 45+ minute queues for 1 match, last year. So i know how hard it is to wait. But people like @ThePloopz just liked to rage and ramble about how unfair life has treated them, because he had to wait for a freaking patch.
Are you still salty about how I made you look dumb in our last conversation? Also if I was raging and upset give me quotes. Now if you want to embarrass yourself again I don’t mind
Here is the comment that started your rage:
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:
Tizzle said:Shards on console have been capped at 1k since early June with the same perks in the shrine.
PS4 players will not get the double bloodpoint event without an update.
I'd say the complaints are justified.
Has a dev confirmed that you won't get the double BPs weekend?
I heard they can’t do it without a patch idk how true that is though
So again, you heard they can´t do it without a patch, but you don´t know how true that is.
I asked you for something official but you started to make strange claims.
Do you really think they go through all this without having the BP event already coded into the actual patch that went live for ps4 and xbox? That they´ll launch another patch?I posted the PATCHES THAT ADDED SUPPORT FOR DOUBLE BLOODPOINTS in the other thread.
You must be blind.
HOW DOES PS4 GET DOUBLE BLOODPOINTS WITHOUT A PATCH?
Oh they probably coded it into their last patch on April 25th, RIGHT????
Use your brain, dude.
With todays patch
facepalmI made that post at 12:56AM.
I refuse to believe you are this stupid.
I don´t look at time stamps.
But you really make me look stupid now, because i have no idea what you are talking about.
I was saying (or at least meaning) that the double BP event will be included in the new patch the ps4 users get today. Nothing else. -
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:
@fcc2014 said: @Tsulan said:
Then why did you guys rage so hard?!
We had threats, insults, some guy stalking Not_Queen on her private stream, calls for money compensations, etc. All while the devs still were within their deadline. I never asked for money, cells, or shards. I never stalked or gave a damn about not queen. Couldn't care less about her hot/not or her stream. Many of us were upset about being forgotten and since you are not on the PS4 you have no idea what it is like trying to find lobbies just to do dailys. Less people are/were playing either in revolt or because they were capped or because no new content since January. If you look at PS4 compensation all i asked was that all future chapter dlc be released at the same time. I´ve been around when survivors had 45+ minute queues for 1 match, last year. So i know how hard it is to wait. But people like @ThePloopz just liked to rage and ramble about how unfair life has treated them, because he had to wait for a freaking patch.
Are you still salty about how I made you look dumb in our last conversation? Also if I was raging and upset give me quotes. Now if you want to embarrass yourself again I don’t mind
Here is the comment that started your rage:
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:
Tizzle said: Shards on console have been capped at 1k since early June with the same perks in the shrine. PS4 players will not get the double bloodpoint event without an update. I'd say the complaints are justified. Has a dev confirmed that you won't get the double BPs weekend?
I heard they can’t do it without a patch idk how true that is though
So again, you heard they can´t do it without a patch, but you don´t know how true that is.
I asked you for something official but you started to make strange claims.
Do you really think they go through all this without having the BP event already coded into the actual patch that went live for ps4 and xbox? That they´ll launch another patch?
No no bring up what actually happened. You started making comments that didn’t make sense and I called you out on it you realized you were being stupid so you tried to cover it up and changed the subject. Now read my comments on this thread alone none of them are rage and most are jokes. This is a pathetic attempt at saying I was raging. Anybody who saw my comments during this wait knows I was not raging at all and I have many many comments. If you really want to get into this we can and I’ll make you look stupid again.
You mean the uncle of your neighbor thing?
That was actually being sarcastic. I really have to make a sarcasm sign for my comments.But i don´t want to start a fight. So please accept my appologies if i have triggered or baited you or hurt your feelings or anything else.
All is good.
I invite you on a beer if you want (and have the age to drink). -
@Tizzle said:
@Tsulan said:
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:@fcc2014 said:
@Tsulan said:
Then why did you guys rage so hard?!
We had threats, insults, some guy stalking Not_Queen on her private stream, calls for money compensations, etc. All while the devs still were within their deadline.
I never asked for money, cells, or shards. I never stalked or gave a damn about not queen. Couldn't care less about her hot/not or her stream. Many of us were upset about being forgotten and since you are not on the PS4 you have no idea what it is like trying to find lobbies just to do dailys. Less people are/were playing either in revolt or because they were capped or because no new content since January. If you look at PS4 compensation all i asked was that all future chapter dlc be released at the same time.
I´ve been around when survivors had 45+ minute queues for 1 match, last year. So i know how hard it is to wait. But people like @ThePloopz just liked to rage and ramble about how unfair life has treated them, because he had to wait for a freaking patch.
Are you still salty about how I made you look dumb in our last conversation? Also if I was raging and upset give me quotes. Now if you want to embarrass yourself again I don’t mind
Here is the comment that started your rage:
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:
Tizzle said:Shards on console have been capped at 1k since early June with the same perks in the shrine.
PS4 players will not get the double bloodpoint event without an update.
I'd say the complaints are justified.
Has a dev confirmed that you won't get the double BPs weekend?
I heard they can’t do it without a patch idk how true that is though
So again, you heard they can´t do it without a patch, but you don´t know how true that is.
I asked you for something official but you started to make strange claims.
Do you really think they go through all this without having the BP event already coded into the actual patch that went live for ps4 and xbox? That they´ll launch another patch?I posted the PATCHES THAT ADDED SUPPORT FOR DOUBLE BLOODPOINTS in the other thread.
You must be blind.
HOW DOES PS4 GET DOUBLE BLOODPOINTS WITHOUT A PATCH?
Oh they probably coded it into their last patch on April 25th, RIGHT????
Use your brain, dude.
With todays patch
facepalm -
Thx for the effort. We appreciate it.
-
There has been nothing official.
No one knows. -
@ThePloopz said:
Gibberish said:Obviously they should just extend the BP event.
To a year.
A YEAR!?!?! ARE YOU INSANE!?!? That’s way waaayyy too little time. They should just start the event and then never end it. I think that’s fair
Now YOU are trolling
-
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:@fcc2014 said:
@Tsulan said:
Then why did you guys rage so hard?!
We had threats, insults, some guy stalking Not_Queen on her private stream, calls for money compensations, etc. All while the devs still were within their deadline.
I never asked for money, cells, or shards. I never stalked or gave a damn about not queen. Couldn't care less about her hot/not or her stream. Many of us were upset about being forgotten and since you are not on the PS4 you have no idea what it is like trying to find lobbies just to do dailys. Less people are/were playing either in revolt or because they were capped or because no new content since January. If you look at PS4 compensation all i asked was that all future chapter dlc be released at the same time.
I´ve been around when survivors had 45+ minute queues for 1 match, last year. So i know how hard it is to wait. But people like @ThePloopz just liked to rage and ramble about how unfair life has treated them, because he had to wait for a freaking patch.
Are you still salty about how I made you look dumb in our last conversation? Also if I was raging and upset give me quotes. Now if you want to embarrass yourself again I don’t mind
Here is the comment that started your rage:
@ThePloopz said:
Tsulan said:
Tizzle said:Shards on console have been capped at 1k since early June with the same perks in the shrine.
PS4 players will not get the double bloodpoint event without an update.
I'd say the complaints are justified.
Has a dev confirmed that you won't get the double BPs weekend?
I heard they can’t do it without a patch idk how true that is though
So again, you heard they can´t do it without a patch, but you don´t know how true that is.
I asked you for something official but you started to make strange claims.
Do you really think they go through all this without having the BP event already coded into the actual patch that went live for ps4 and xbox? That they´ll launch another patch? -
@fcc2014 said:
@ThePloopz i knew he was baiting just like Lowbei does.Thx for the comment. If i would have seen it earlier i wouldn´t have bothered answering you with a lengthy message.
I´m not baiting. It was just sad how the ps4 community went crazy. Tried to calm the situation. But that´s seen nowadays as baiting.
So enjoy your patch and have fun with the game like everyone else. -
@fcc2014 said:
@Tsulan said:
I´ve been around when survivors had 45+ minute queues for 1 match, last year. So i know how hard it is to wait. But people like @ThePloopz just liked to rage and ramble about how unfair life has treated them, because he had to wait for a freaking patch.
Last year we had the same garbage with how the lobbies loaded and matched up. If you were in that same spot capped, can't find lobbies, and 2/3 of the platforms got the update and all you got as a response was as soon as we know something you will know something i think you overestimate how you would react to this situation also.
Well, as many already explained. It wasn´t in the devs hands. They gave everything they had to Sony, and they started with their quality control. There was nothing behavior could have done to accelerate the process.
When the devs say, they´ll tell us as soon as they know (what they actually did).Was it bad to have no notifications during the weekend + national holiday? Yes, but people have a right to celebrate their weekend + holidays. So i wouldn´t blame them for that. Even if PC had a month long delay, with a previous announcement that it will be a month long delay for a patch.
-
@fcc2014 said:
@Tsulan said:
Then why did you guys rage so hard?!
We had threats, insults, some guy stalking Not_Queen on her private stream, calls for money compensations, etc. All while the devs still were within their deadline.I never asked for money, cells, or shards. I never stalked or gave a damn about not queen. Couldn't care less about her hot/not or her stream. Many of us were upset about being forgotten and since you are not on the PS4 you have no idea what it is like trying to find lobbies just to do dailys. Less people are/were playing either in revolt or because they were capped or because no new content since January. If you look at PS4 compensation all i asked was that all future chapter dlc be released at the same time.
I´ve been around when survivors had 45+ minute queues for 1 match, last year. So i know how hard it is to wait. But people like @ThePloopz just liked to rage and ramble about how unfair life has treated them, because he had to wait for a freaking patch.
-
@Jack11803 said:
Well, it’s getting released today.And they still act selfentitled and toxic.
It´s really sad.