TheLegendDyl4n1
TheLegendDyl4n1
About
- Username
- TheLegendDyl4n1
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@powerbats said:
@MandyTalk said:
Appreciate your patience, the bot does pick up a lot of the spam (it picks up way more than makes it onto the forums) and I appreciate how annoying it is to have to wade through spam posts on the front page, but we really do try to get to them as fast as possible.A question for you then @MandyTalk why isn't there an option to flag and report just by clicking on the thread itself? It'd be similar to how League Of Legends does there, you simply right click and and flag it as x. That way the spammer doesn't get any views which is what they're after.
The thread gets flagged enough it gets auto hidden for a mod to take a look at and if people are abusing the flag system they get a temp ban.
i know i just dont care about flagging anymore becausei cant flag more than 3 at a time or i have to wait 180 secs to do anything else and i also agree i shouldnt have to go into the post to flag it
-
bump
-
bump
-
bump
-
OH NOES ITS HAPPENING AGAIN SOMEONE HIDE ME OR THEY WILL PUT ME IN THE OVEN
-
@powerbats said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@powerbats said:
One of the biggest issues with having it ingame is then the trolls would run around spamming it while alerting the killer to where people are.that comes with almost every game with coms
True but given this is an asymmetrical game where you can't just leave middle of the match like say COD/Star War Battlefront etc.You also can't really afford the time to tab/hit x key or w/e to mute someone. The troll in here is much more destructive than in other games as well.
ok. well if someone is abusing mic, then they could add a new report feature after the game ends and you can report people for being trolls in-game over mic (the audio files would be saved in the games file data base. if storage became a problem, then they could save the audio files for up to 24 hours, unless someone is reported, then the audio files would be saved until looked into) (this would be for people who cuss, are rude, or play loud music)
-
@powerbats said:
One of the biggest issues with having it ingame is then the trolls would run around spamming it while alerting the killer to where people are.that comes with almost every game with coms.
-
let me give a prime example guys "Fortnite" is a cross platform game. they can easily allow cross-platform between xbox and ps4 but Sony wont allow it and it as simple as hitting a button because a few months ago this happened they accidentley opened the gate between the two and ps4 and xbox players alike played with each other until sony found out and yelled at them and so fortnite had to close it. games can easily have cross platform if sony didnt own ps4 or got overthemselves. but if this was ever added it would have to be after dedicated servers are added
-
@chemical_reject said:
fcc2014 said:Yeah that isn't even a concern for me. The latency issue would. It is bad enough as it is now. Dedicated Servers would be the best Quality of Life change they could make.
If F13th the game gets those dedicated servers they have recently said they were about to implement, then DBD has no reason not to
i thought F13 had no more dev team?
-
@Maxi605 said:
Wouldn't be fair for controller player to play against/with PC player.yup
-
@Zaije said:
Mad_Will said:@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@Mad_Will said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@Mad_Will said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i said speedos AND I MEANT IT RAWR lol jk but i mean we all want it (all the people who like guys of course)
LOL As long as he has a bulge, a flat crutch would be no good, unless he is wearing a jock strap.
yessssssss jesus every game i play with male characters they have no bulge but the girls have big brests? like in the sims 4 you can change the side of the boobs but not the bulge
Very true ! This is the only good example of a bulge that I have seen in a video game so far. (Apologies to the Friday the 13th game haters)
you see this exactly but only bigger
LOL and bouncier too, but not too bouncy.
I want to see the helicopter personally
ok then....... SURE!
-
@Mad_Will said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@Mad_Will said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@Mad_Will said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i said speedos AND I MEANT IT RAWR lol jk but i mean we all want it (all the people who like guys of course)
LOL As long as he has a bulge, a flat crutch would be no good, unless he is wearing a jock strap.
yessssssss jesus every game i play with male characters they have no bulge but the girls have big brests? like in the sims 4 you can change the side of the boobs but not the bulge
Very true ! This is the only good example of a bulge that I have seen in a video game so far. (Apologies to the Friday the 13th game haters)

you see this exactly but only bigger
LOL and bouncier too, but not too bouncy.
yassss
-
@mcNuggets said:
It's been like 2 years.
2 years of self care, decisive strike, sprint burst and adrenaline crutch.I just played a round without self care, it felt awesome.
I actually feared the killer as they could insta down me.
I was [BAD WORD] frightened, then I equipped self care, decisive, sprint burst and good ol adrenaline back.
Then again there was no [BAD WORD] challenge at all, I wasn't feeling scared, I was feeling superior...
The only situation I really felt helpless (which should be all the time the killer hunts me in my opinion) is when I am the last survivor alive.These 4 (maybe more) perks are 0% balanced and way too user friendly and overpowered (adrenaline is actually ok, if the "devs" finally fix gen rushing).
But even without perks, a proper team can still gen rush or loop for a really long time at given places.Whenever I play survivor, I dominate the killer almost every game.
I just dominate them over and over again. It doesn't even feel like fun anymore.Whenever I loose, it's due to the killer facecamping/tunneling (the real tunneling) me, being a nurse or due to HIGHLY incompetent teammates.
Never because I really got outplayed until my death.It just bothers me the game is balanced around overpowered perks, poorly placed map structures and exploits.
As killer you are forced to run Ruin, as survivor you are forced to run self care + any exhaustion perk.
If you don't equip those perks and none of your teammates does, your chance to loose is significantly higher (like 80% higher if you are a bad player).Without perks (mainly as killer) only if the opponent is #########, you are able to win those games then.
Please devs, finally adress these issues.
They suck, I was used to the game being a competitive horror game, but the horror aspect is completely gone, due to overpowered perks, (infinite) loops and gen rushing.
Since I entered red ranks I don't feel the fun I had when first playing dead by daylight.Just try to balance both sides equally. For once.
I wanna get frightened as survivor and make people frightened as killer, that's the only reason for me I actually began playing this game.I stopped playing this way, because I can't anymore due to me being rank 1 and everyone being in tryhard mode there.
I am now using crutch perks, crutch strategies and in general don't bring fun to survivors/killers I verse.I don't want to play that way, I really don't want to.
But everytime I try to play for fun, I get dominated, and people are always sofucking toxic (for no reason), they make me angry as [BAD WORD] and I return to playing like a bastard. always.I don't wanna stop playing DbD, just because the balance is screwed since the release.
Just have a great day and try to be less toxic, dear players, maybe we can until the game is fixed, create a enoyable experience for every player.
ok so is noed a crutch perk? yes, stop complaining about really good survivor perks when you killers have plenty of perks to counter them. you hate DS use unnerving presence. you hate self care? bring sloppy butcher. you hate adrenaline? bring NOED. you hate sprint burst? just dont swing at them and just follow if you know they have it your just mad because sprint burst is now used before exhaustion add-ons can do anything to stop the perks (AKA the clowns exhaustion bottles). the only real way to win against as a killer is to stop complaining about survivor perks and learn how to work around them like i did when i went from playing only survivor to playing survivor sometimes and killer sometimes.
-
@Vietfox said:
Sounds balanced to mei know right!
-
@Nightmare247 said:
I am ok with the suggestion, but the game would suffer from it. I don't want to argue comms vs SWF vs discord etc.If that would happen the game would suffer because the lag to the host killer would be nearly unbearable for some killers. There is enough lag since the game is hosted client side, just imagine that much more bandwidth being flooded so players could talk.
No thank you for the Quality of Life that this prevents from taking a dive. Now if Dedicated servers were a thing....we may have a different discussion.
This would have to be added after dedicated servers, because if dedicated servers arent added soon enough i will just stop playing until they are. most killers Internets are so bad i just DC for no reason.
-
@CoolAKn said:
@xmenfanatic said:
It would be neat if maybe a noise alert happened in game for the killer when the game recognized noise or communication by a survivor over the mic. It would make it slightly more risky to talk at times like a chase o while needing to hide, so,survivors could,only communicate when they are already safe without alerting the killer.I also love the idea of them implementing a 5 way voice chat that goe sup in volume as you get closer to a survivor. I have no idea how complicated that might be, but it would be awesome to hear survivors talk when you’re close by them, be they communicating to you as another survivor or when you’re nearby as the killer. It would add more intensity and tactful playing. I think it would be pretty exciting if you knew the killer heard you the closer her got to you.
But then, if you add the risk of getting caught while using voice chat, SWF will still use Skype or Discord because there is no risk to using those.
but the people who dont use it would then be able to talk to people who are in-game. the game creators cant control if people use discord or skype only the ones who cant use those and play solo.
-
@shanks3042 said:
Sacrifice yourself before you get unhooked and go on to the next game 8-)
Haha. Just kidding. These farmers are very annoying.well i mean the perk is called 'Were Gonna Farm Forever" even i do it
-
@tenderronii said:
TheHourMan said:I think all survivors should have at least one clothing set as stealthy as prestige claudette tbh.
AGREED LOL 💪💯
yup i main nea and most of the time i get spotted so i just run but if i play claudete then shes too dark
-
@xmenfanatic said:
I’d love a perk that raises the amount of totems on a field, and makes it so your curses jump from one totem to the next when broken.Ie;
This perk adds 1/2/3 more totems onto the field. When a survivor dismantles a hex totem, that hex will jump to the furthest away available totem 1/2/3 times. This works for any Hex individually up to the number of times listed, until there is only one blank totem left available.What do you all think?
i dont like this idea check the one i posted a while back on my account it is very ballanced i am a survivor main and feel totems are too easy and that the idea i suggested is pretty good.
-
@Zarathos said:
I am frankly sick of playing this game when every survivor player usually with ds and a flashlight dc the minute they mess up. I never encounter this problem in low ranks but in high ranks the number of anti mates is absurd. We need way harsher penalties for dcers. Just a temp ban if a player has left 3 games in a 24 hour period. I am pleading with behavior to put out another wave of bans so we can deal with these toxic players who are killing any enjoyment in this game.well im sick of this game when i dont bring DS even though i can hit it and i dont bring a flashlight when i can flashlight save. and we are killing your enjoyment? how about when killers that have all bloody clothing at rank 1 get angry because they cant one shot me with a chainsaw (Billy) and i chase them for 2 gens and they hook me and stand in front of me with thier chainsaw . good thing a person saved me and he tried to M1 me but hit the other person and eventually we all escaped through the exit gate. my point is is that is a 1/100 chance that i survive if the killer had suceeded i would of been dead due to me waiting to phase 2 (struggle) back to the point at high ranks killers expect survivors to be babys and not experienced and think they deserve the kill because of thier prestiege. if he wouldnt of camped he could of easily killed another survivor but no he didnt. dont say your annoyed by the game and we arent when most people arent SWF you just go unlucky try console most of us arent SWF
-
@mcNuggets said:
No and no, you shouldnt get points for struggling if you don't even get to struggle.
You had a whole game time to farm points, if you die, your fault.Yes and yes, just because i am the last survivor doesnt mean i dont deserve struggle points if i am not on my last hook. the only way to get survival points is 1) getting off a killers shoulder 2) healing yourself (it should give survival points for Self care skillchecks not alruism, 3) give me my dang struggle points or you die.
-
@powerbats said:
Instant death should still happen but the person should also get the struggle points, perhaps basing the amount on what they contributed to the game. So that the person who hid in lockers al game and did no gens, totems, helas, unhooks etc doesn't get any or little.no the basic amount of struggle points given for a full struggle is all i want
-
@Daveo_U_B said:
We need more Latino survivors please. I would love to have more survivors from Latin America. Being a Latino myself, there are not very many options. Ace is from Argentina, but I would like some darker skinned Latinos to choose from.as long as he is extremely hot sure (more daddy then david king shirtless)
-
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO MAYBE NO AHHHHH
-
@CoolAKn said:
Questions:- What range would a normal survivor voice be heard from? Would it be heard from anywhere or just close by?
- If range is limited, what would be used to communicate with other survivors? The technology in the game is extremely basic, the most advanced thing I would say are the generators.
- Would survivors be forced to forego a Med-Kit or Toolbox in order to hold a communication device? How long would the communication device last?
- Would the killer be able to hear survivor chatter? Would Stridor enhance the audible range of survivor chatter? Can killers talk to survivors?
- If the killer can hear, it could make bullying much worse for the killer or, toxic survivors could sell out other survivors in exchange for freedom. What about survivors using the voice chat to be annoying? Or to play non-stop music?
Pros:
- Ability to communicate with other survivors (privately?) and increase survivor efficiency.
- Would bring solo survivors to the same level as SWF.
- Survivors would have extensive map information (killer's whereabouts, totems, generators, items, etc).
- Survivors can balance perks and items in the lobby.
- Mute stupid people (not really a pro, since you already can't hear stupid people right now).
Cons:
- Toxic survivors would abuse this.
- If communication is not private, it would reveal a survivor's location (free Whispers for the killer).
- Survivors would use it to have irrelevant conversations.
- Voice chatter could drown out in-game noise, like the heartbeat.
- Some people with mics can either be unintelligible, or have a language barrier.
- Some people don't have mics or just don't want to talk.
- Would make certain perks (for killer and survivor) worthless or have less value.
Overall, this is a mixed bag for me. I currently don't have a mic, and even if I did, I would only use it to share vital information.
Q1) i would say very low, can barely hear the people talking, at 24 meters maybe to highest,can hear perfectly, at 15 meters only close by. i think this would be the best.
Q2-3)it is possible that a item could be added in the game to allow unlimited chat range like a walkie-talkie but i doubt it, just being able to talk to each other at a close range is best.
Q4) i think the killer would be able to hear survivor chatter, but maybe not what they are saying (to stop toxicness) maybe gargle it or something, make the entity mess up the words so they couldnt be understood by the killer. you could also maybe make them have a less hearing range like only 15 meters to maybe 10. and its possible allow the killer to talk to survivor but i would think of this as a bad idea (toxic) so i would say no the killer getting mic (they could ask to farm or be like hacker i caught you!!!!!)
Q5) there would be a mic button next to each survivor, not for the killers why would they mute the survivors if they can hear gargle if they talk, and you could mute any other survivor if they played annoying music or were just annoying in the first place. the only problem i forsee is them giving away your position if thier near you and the killer finds you from hearing noises.
N/A1) i think this would allow closeby teammates to communicate what they have done (how many totems, any 99% gens, what perks you think the killer has, what perks eachother has, what they are doing after the gen and where to meet up to work on gens together). and yes people would still use discord or skype to talk to each other while gaming, but this would also let solo people like me be able to talk to other people unlike now.
N/A2) (forgot what i was going to say will add later if remembered) -
@xmenfanatic said:
@CoolAKn said:
@xmenfanatic said:
It would be neat if maybe a noise alert happened in game for the killer when the game recognized noise or communication by a survivor over the mic. It would make it slightly more risky to talk at times like a chase o while needing to hide, so,survivors could,only communicate when they are already safe without alerting the killer.I also love the idea of them implementing a 5 way voice chat that goe sup in volume as you get closer to a survivor. I have no idea how complicated that might be, but it would be awesome to hear survivors talk when you’re close by them, be they communicating to you as another survivor or when you’re nearby as the killer. It would add more intensity and tactful playing. I think it would be pretty exciting if you knew the killer heard you the closer her got to you.
But then, if you add the risk of getting caught while using voice chat, SWF will still use Skype or Discord because there is no risk to using those.
I still think it would be a really cool feature in the game, and when people Dd use it, it would make the games so much more exciting

cool
-
@Dreamnomad said:
There are a lot of things I would do differently if I started playing the game now. A big one would be to be much more careful with unlocking teachable perks. I have almost all the killer perks unlocked now and getting the perks I like to use regularly unlocked is a serious pain since I have so many garbage perks to filter through. What I would like to see done is make it so when you have all 3 teachable perks unlocked on a character, you have the ability to toggle one of them locked.For example, if I have Predator, Bloodhound, and Shadowborn unlocked on the wraith I would be able to turn off Shadowborn and have that perk not show up as a perk option on the bloodweb. This obviously wouldn't effect active bloodwebs. I feel like the current system punishes long term for decisions that were made without full knowledge of how the game works. This seems like a fair compromise.
the bloodweb is suppose to be random if you want the perks then just farm until you get them like i did for nea i was fine with leveling up to 50 and then 30 after until i got self care just take your time and eventually the bloodweb will be forced to give the perk to you
-
ok whatever guys i dont care about the chance to escape i just care about the BP for struggling i miss out on
-
@mcNuggets said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@mcNuggets said:
So you want the killer to look at you dying for 120 seconds, just because you feel like you shouldn't have died?You actually should instantly die when being the last survivor.
And that without going through all the stages which serves no reason anyway.i dont mind dying instantly as the last survivor if it allowed you to try and escape off the hook and if you didn't you would just die instantly and just give you all the points for struggle but it takes the point away from struggle
Even if you get off the hook, the killer just smacks you down another time, you don't deserve to live as last survivor on hook anyways.
You and your team lost. The end.not a team 4 individual survivors.
-
@White_Owl said:
Usually to check if a gen has been touched by a survivor the killer needs to see it to check for sparks, and to do it he must spend some time going around walls etc, especially in some maps like Lery's Memorial. But if regressing generators made a distinct sound so that the killer can tell if it's regressing or not just by listening, that could save him a bit of time, and since it seems the trend lately is to help killers with time management (faster animations etc) I think this could be a good change in that direction.so you want to be able to know if it regressing when not even on the same side of the wall as it? if it was realistic you wouldnt be able to hear it unless in the area not beside a 1 foot wide wall
-
@Mad_Will said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@Mad_Will said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i said speedos AND I MEANT IT RAWR lol jk but i mean we all want it (all the people who like guys of course)
LOL As long as he has a bulge, a flat crutch would be no good, unless he is wearing a jock strap.
yessssssss jesus every game i play with male characters they have no bulge but the girls have big brests? like in the sims 4 you can change the side of the boobs but not the bulge
Very true ! This is the only good example of a bulge that I have seen in a video game so far. (Apologies to the Friday the 13th game haters)

you see this exactly but only bigger
-
@Dav105 said:
I just think prestige blood should be a toggle option for any cosmetic. I mean it'd take a while to make the system to wrap a blood texture onto the model but I feel like it's doable. There are some really cool cosmetics that I like to use but would look even better if I could add prestige blood to it.
same i feel exactly like you do all of us long-term game players would love this.
-
@powerbats said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
idk ######### i put that thier for
Because reasons unbeknownst to you on a galactic scale mind controlled you to do so.
ok then......
-
@mcNuggets said:
So you want the killer to look at you dying for 120 seconds, just because you feel like you shouldn't have died?You actually should instantly die when being the last survivor.
And that without going through all the stages which serves no reason anyway.i dont mind dying instantly as the last survivor if it allowed you to try and escape off the hook and if you didn't you would just die instantly and just give you all the points for struggle but it takes the point away from struggle
-
@scumrrado said:
I played a game yesterday against the Nurse. My friend was hooked, right in front of the hatch. The killer camped her until she died, making me the last survivor. I was hiding in a locker right behind the hook near the hatch.The moment the Nurse left the hatch, I darted for it. Unfortunately, she came back and caught me. I had never been hooked or even damaged the entire round. I helped light 4/5 generators. But I get hooked and die instantly because I'm the last survivor...
I understand that it's a team based game, but at that point the killer already has a huge advantage. I should at the very least be able to make attempts to get off the hook. Every other survivor had that option. Why not the last survivor? All the luck perks and offerings in the world are just thrown away.
its not team based considering we dont have coms in game since really its any survivor for themselves without BP why would we save people from hooks if at least 2 gens were done
-
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@fcc2014 said:
chemical_reject said:
fcc2014 said:Give them a little bit on this one. Everyone submit a question on the youtube q&a thread @chemical_reject @Vietfox @PinkEricka @Nickenzie @Orion @powerbats @YankeeSan @Dwights_leftfoot @NoxiousOnnyyxx @Condorloco_26 @Jigsawn @sulaiman @Daddy_Doctor @Michiko . If we give them 8-15 people asking for color blind support and the question isn't even addressed than you can deservedly ######### on them for ignoring the issue.
Well gosh, u just HAVE to be the voice of reason

When im the voice of reason we are in trouble.
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii wannnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaa swiiiiiiiiiiing frooooooooooommm the chandlieeeeeeer from the CHANDILEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
idk ######### i put that thier for
-
@fcc2014 said:
chemical_reject said:
fcc2014 said:Give them a little bit on this one. Everyone submit a question on the youtube q&a thread @chemical_reject @Vietfox @PinkEricka @Nickenzie @Orion @powerbats @YankeeSan @Dwights_leftfoot @NoxiousOnnyyxx @Condorloco_26 @Jigsawn @sulaiman @Daddy_Doctor @Michiko . If we give them 8-15 people asking for color blind support and the question isn't even addressed than you can deservedly ######### on them for ignoring the issue.
Well gosh, u just HAVE to be the voice of reason

When im the voice of reason we are in trouble.
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii wannnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaa swiiiiiiiiiiing frooooooooooommm the chandlieeeeeeer from the CHANDILEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
-
@OXY said:
The issue with SWF is that they can inform each other on the Killers location to the point where it puts the killer at a huge disadvantage. So if you have voice coms available with randoms then it doesn't really fix the problem, but instead makes it much worse and unavoidable.Imagine it though, having some little ######### screaming down your ear as you're carrying him to the hook because you downed him, being toxic asf. Nah.
i also forgot to put in that you could mute any people in game through the settings in-game to solve this issue and thier would also be a voice com indicator at the top of the screen somewhere so if you muted it wouldnt be an issue. any mutes would be saved so if you met them again they would already be muted
-
i wouldnt mind killers have 5 or 6 perks if this were added because then maybe you could say its a 6 perks vs 16 perks
-
@RSB said:
@Angie said:
@RSB said:
Everyone knows, that SWF is not fair. Thanks to their coordination and voice chats, they gain the benefits of several aura reading perks, they can coordinate which perks they bring, they can set their roles (gen-rusher, looper), etc.Dear devs, you know, and I know it. But what can you do? Deleting it would irritate survivors, which would end up in the drop of the playerbase and your earnings, which are important. Without them you cannot develop this game.
So, deleting it would irritate them, nerfing it probably too. So what now?This is my idea:
Split the game into two gamemodes.
1) 1 versus 4, 5 generators - The same as it is now, BUT without SWF. What does it mean? It means that ONLY solo survivors can join to the lobby of the killer. They cannot be in SWF
2) 2 versus 6, 9 generators - Yes, 2vs6. "Fight fire with fire", as they say. Let the killer play with his friend in KWF mode (Kill With Friend). In this mode, 2 killers join to the first lobby (the same lobby as SWF has), then they click "Ready" and create the proper lobby, where survivors can join. It would be the only lobby where survivors could play in SWF, and it would be OPTIONAL for solo survivors to join this lobby as well (just and option, in Settings, or in the main menu, which enables the solo survivor to play in 2vs6 lobby). Then, you could limit the teammates in SWF to 3, so there would be maximum of 2 teams of SWF in one lobby (but this is optional).
What are your thoughts?
TBH, second one is fun in theory but it should only be a KYF and not it's own newly made mode. It would seem super super overpowered no matter how much more you add into it. And 1 killer to 4 survivors doing 5 gens, why would 2 killers to 6 survivors needing to do 9 GENS make sense?!?! The problem with this is either devs would have to add in more gens to maps meaning 11 gens total, or they would make one more additional gen and require EVERY gen to be done on the map which is impossible since 2 killers would just camp and rotate between chases. A better way for this mode is just increasing 2 killers, 5 Survs, and still 5 gens. It's a tricky way to challenge the 2 killers since gens can be done faster but in KYF you can use perks that make the game fun and balanced for everyone.
Why should be it only in KYF? And why would it be overpowered? Now, SWF can use voice comms, which is totally unfair, so why can't killers have a chance, to play with their friends in a new mode?
2vs6 - Imagine 8 survivors storming gens, as there could be 6-8 survivors at one time at one gen! It would be too much. 9 gens, because now survivors need to repair 5 gens, half from te 5 is 2,5, and because there cannot be 8,5 gens - we need 9.
i would play this gamemode out of SWF if they added coms in-game then i would be fine with this
-
@fcc2014 said:
Unless we have dedicated servers i have no interest in dealing with two ######### connections.
what they said
-
@Morter said:
Don't you see them when items are on the floor? Might actually be a bug.yeah but only when thye are on the floor in chests you only see the item not the add-ons
-
@TheHourMan said:
If you had just looked on the second page of comments here, you would see that I already posted about this btw, even going as far as including screenshots of how exactly to enable these filters.but that isnt even apart of the game itself most big and great games support colorblindness in the setting with a simple change and what about console players? they can download this so called app so are they supose to buy a pc just to play this game after downloading something seperate from the base game itself?
-
@MegMain98 said:
Or maybe add a feature where the killer cannot see the survivors name or profile similar to how survivors cannot see who the killer is or their name and profile until the end of the game.on pc you actually can look up the killer profile in the tab section area
-
@MisterCremaster said:
You're asking for separate things though. On playstation you flat out CAN'T change your username on the system. On XBox you can for a fee. I'd be willing to place a bet that both Sony and MS have a terms of service for developers that specifically DOESN'T allow players to change their name in game for lots of reasons.Set your online settings to display as offline when you don't want to be invited party chats.
i didnt know that about ps4 and if your offline on xbox you still can get party invites and messages they could at least add a option to stop people from seeing/clicking your name and going to your profile on console and pc
-
@White_Owl said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@RSB said:
@xmenfanatic said:
The launch trailer only shows three characters. A guy with a baseball cap who looks like a significantly less nerdy Dwight. A girl who looks like a hybrid of both Claudette and Meg, and a nerdy librarian girl hanging from a hook. I haven’t seen any confirmation that those characters had the same names and backstory as any of the four that were released with the game.
These character designs were the original rough drafts of the three. They probably switched races for the girls, and then decided to make Dwight nerdy to make him more relatable.
That being said, I’d honestly love it if they added the three of them in with different abilities and names/backgrounds. Their designs are unique enough that they could certainly stand out, and possibly even be able to represent some of the quoted characters off of perks and items. One could even be Vigo, though I’d prefer if they gave Vigo a different design then any of those three.
They are the original characters, devs slightly changed their looks after the beta, so newbs always think, that in the trailer there are different characters.
i am not a newb i have over 1000 hours in game and i main nea she is P3 with every perk. they just never confirmed if they were the survivors who were morphed into our original 4
Actually yes, they did. The black girl is Meg and the white one is Claudette. They switched their etnicity to make them less cliché
ok i didnt know that thank you i am guessing this was all confirmed by the devs.
-
@Master said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i see that people on PC can change their in-game names all the time especially on you tube but i play on Xbox i have my gamer-tag. i was wondering if maybe you could add a system in-game that allowed you to change your name to add a little fun and make it to where if they click on your name in-game it just took you to their profile and maybe add an option to not allow other survivor or killers to click on your name and go to your out of game profile. i have a problem with other survivors being annoying and spamming me with party invites and i dont want to have to block all notifications but i have to because of this or killers saying "yOu WaNNa fARm?" every few games and then having other survivors farm me and me be dead in the first 2 minutes of the game cause i refused to farm. this would be an awesome customization that PC players enjoy but Xbox and Ps4 miss out on and i would love for this to exist.Thats only supported on steam.
On consoles your name is unique because it is bound to your PSN /Xbox identityyeah but the devs could add a in-game system that aloud anyone to change thier name in-game only while also adding settings that could block people from clicking your name and going to your steam/ps4/xbox one accounts. on xbox we dont have a end game messaging and so we get bombarded with hate messages on xbox or we got spammed with invites forcing us to block them. if another survivor i couldnt save couldnt click on my name and be able to message me then it would stop them from being toxic towards me and i go on my merry way. now these names would have to be accepted first but if accepted we could change our name to virtually anything as long as it doesnt include any bad words or anything else the devs decide to add. now say you wanted friends only to see your gamertag like underneath or above your fake name that could be another option. again it doesnt matter if steam allows free name changes and xbox/ps4 dont this in game option would allow people like me to change my name to something with nea. it could also be possible to allow multiple names to exist at once so say alot of people wanted to have thier name be Nea or Nea Karlson they could or say i wanted to be a Cult leader and have Cultists i could. anyone who says this is a bad idea is a toxic person who loves being able to spam/message to people. i mean you see people on steam check survivor play hours and if its too high sometimes they leave well with this it could be blocked and same for killer. on xbox its the same way if a killer sees someone with alot of hours on dbd they will just leave the lobby its not that hard to click compare games it takes like 10 secs. i would really like a mod to give thier feedback since i clearly asked the DEVS/MODS not people who want to criticise something that has no effect on the base game except making it more custimizable. if the devs want to ban toxic names they can do that too
-
@RSB said:
@xmenfanatic said:
The launch trailer only shows three characters. A guy with a baseball cap who looks like a significantly less nerdy Dwight. A girl who looks like a hybrid of both Claudette and Meg, and a nerdy librarian girl hanging from a hook. I haven’t seen any confirmation that those characters had the same names and backstory as any of the four that were released with the game.
These character designs were the original rough drafts of the three. They probably switched races for the girls, and then decided to make Dwight nerdy to make him more relatable.
That being said, I’d honestly love it if they added the three of them in with different abilities and names/backgrounds. Their designs are unique enough that they could certainly stand out, and possibly even be able to represent some of the quoted characters off of perks and items. One could even be Vigo, though I’d prefer if they gave Vigo a different design then any of those three.
They are the original characters, devs slightly changed their looks after the beta, so newbs always think, that in the trailer there are different characters.
i am not a newb i have over 1000 hours in game and i main nea she is P3 with every perk. they just never confirmed if they were the survivors who were morphed into our original 4
-
but they wernt in the launch trailer im asking if the main girl is claudete that they changed over time or if it is a complete other survivor together
-
GUYS STOP OR THE DISCUSSION WILL BE CLOSED WE ALL AGREE BOTH SIDES ARE IN THE WRONG YOU SHOULD JUST allow yourself to be caught and executed AS A SURVIVOR RIGHT? JUST INSTA THROW DOWN PALLETS WHILE THE KILLER JUST BLOODLUSTS YOU.