Squirrel_Thicc
Squirrel_Thicc
About
- Username
- Squirrel_Thicc
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@HealsBadMan said:
I'm a Claudette main- im the last person who wants someone to get tunneled for playing a certain character. I hate the fact that Lisa is overpriced, but am I gonna take it out on people who bought her? No, thats too much on top of the hole in their wallets.
Facts.
-
This isn't bhvrs fault. Idk how so many people think that they're to blame smh.
-
@bingbongboi90 said:
idc about this lisa thing… they paid for that skin i dont so why would I care😂.
The only time I want to ruin a survivors game is when they want to ruin my fun. Insert jokers voice: GET WHAT YOU FACKING DESERVE!!!!!
Yeah they're doing it for pretty much no reason.
-
Boo hoo. You're a different character. What do you want? Cheryl's face on lisa's body vice versa?
-
More unique killer pallet break animations.
-
Jane.
-
Still get it. You should get all the teachables that you can because then you'll be able to get more from the shrine :)
-
@Frankie said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1362837#Comment_1362837
Her price is part of licensing. Which is why you can buy two full on silent hill DLC's for the price of one Lisa. Pyramidhead is far more famous of a character.
Konami isn't in a position to be overcharging for anything these days. They're a dead company that makes mobile games and pachinko machines. They're also the company that in their infinite (lack of) wisdom, fired Hideo Kojima. The guy who kept them afloat in AAA gaming with his games on his back. Silent Hill is a great franchise, but an overall dead one. It's the only reason BHVR was able to get a hold of it.
Exactly my point. Why blame bvhr? They have no control over it, so the tunneling all lisa's thing is utterly stupid.
-
Lisa because she's my favorite sh character. And she looks amazing in this game ngl.
-
@Frankie said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1362824#Comment_1362824
I mean, Lisa is also one of the easiest survivors to see on any map. With the bright red and white colors on her. Some people want her dead, but you are running around as a beacon saying "LOOK AT ME IM BRIGHT!!! (but pls dont kill me)". You can literally see her outfit through the cornfield.
Some ARE tunneling her - and part of the reasoning is because of what she represents. BHVR is charging more for this SKIN than they are for 2, full fledged survivors, with full separate perk abilities, names, cosmetic potential and voices...when they couldn't bother to add an actual lobby name and voice to this "legendary skin". A lot of people are actually rebelling against that, because (wait for it) it's a BS money grab and nothing gets BHVR's attention more than killers being dicks to survivors. FACT.
If they want to rebel, tunneling lisa won't do anything... sorry to say but the dev's don't care about that stuff. I'm specifically talking about people to tunnel only because im lisa, not the colors. What you probably don't understand is that her price is probably part of licensing. Konami wanted to make her really expensive probably because they probably couldn't for cheryl.
-
@BigBrainMegMain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1362804#Comment_1362804
It's Lisa Garland and her name is still Cheryl Mason in the Lobby.
No idea how a simple change was so difficult and it flew right above their heads.
Yeah that's the ONLY complaint I have but again, it's not enough to ruin her for me
-
@Frankie said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/162423/stop-doing-this
I feel like we should be able to play how we want.
Also - player count is largely stagnant. Hasn't really gone up or gone down. It's not pushing anyone away. Even more than that, survivors have more bully power than killers could ever hope to in this game.
We should be able to play however we want huh? Well I should be able to play a character without being targeted because of her. Also yes it is pushing people away. All of my friends have pretty much quit the game not because of the game, but the players.
-
I'm at the point of quitting killer forever. It's just not fun at all.
-
I honestly think people are upset for something really small. Like... it's just a voice, you're still playing as a whole different character.
-
It's just dbd having the most toxic survival horror community in the gaming scene. Players just wanna ruin the game for everyone for any reason they can think of.
-
What you people need to understand is that it doesn't matter if they don't change her voice and name. YOU'RE PLAYING AS LISA GARLAND. And for the love of God stop complaining if you're not even gonna buy her.
-
I saw a stupid forum of someone trying to encourage killers to be toxic towards lisa's as a stand against the dev's for not doing what they wanted with her. It's the most petty and self centered thing I've seen on the forums ever. And if they wanna tunnel me because I have no perks then jokes on them cause I'm level 50 lol.
-
@GrootDude said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1358960#Comment_1358960
Her newest rift skin is my favorite! <3
It looks great and fits her character. All you can ask for in a skin lol.
-
Omg I used to be a hardcore Kate main. What skin is your favorite? Mine is the winter skin.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1358942#Comment_1358942
Can you post actual links to those threads? I wanna test a theory.
@EnviouSLAY said:
I find it kind of upsetting that the cannibal is able to unlock claudettes face as a cosmetic. I understand he is able to do so with the entire original 4 survivors; but being able to wear claudettes face is actually pretty problematic. We already deal with a lot of toxicity in the community, especially racism/homophobia, so the fact that there is a white killer that is able to actually paint his face black (african american) as a cosmetic is pretty messed up. I don't think this should be a cosmetic in the game still, it was an interesting idea for cosmetics you can unlock via achieving a certain about of kills on a certain survivor, but at the end of the day this is appropriating toxic/racist behavior especially by killers who troll afterwords and use racial slurs.
-
Yay!!! Let's ruin the game for someone just because they like a character. Seriously lisa's fine.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1358922#Comment_1358922
For the record, I didn't say this thread was bait, I said the other thread that was linked here looked like bait because the OP opened it and then never replied.
You've also yet to show anyone proof of people complaining about "racism" on the forum regarding Leatherface wearing Claudette's face.
There's your proof.
-
Every survivor's stance in game is the same for the genders. The only thing I want to change is for her to have lisa Garland show up in the menu screen. Also it'd be nice for a new voice but it doesn't matter too much to me. Plus I think lisa has a great voice already.
-
Yeah people just love to complain. Im loving the new chapter. I've never played dbd more in one day than today and I still wanna keep playing lol.
-
@brokedownpalace said:
Btw I'm with @Orion I think this is largely bait. Of course SOMEONE out there thinks it's racist but you can find a few people who believe in anything.
I was just asking for the community's general opinion. Why do y'all feel the need to be so negative. I literally was just asking for opinions and you think I'm just trying to bait people? Smh please dont comment on opinionated forums if you're not giving your opinion on the topic.
-
@Frankie said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1356757#Comment_1356757
Okay - I'll give you an opinion. Jake is Asian. Nobody complains.
There, I literally took the logic of anyone who could be offended by and and smashed it into bits.
Great. That's all you had to say to begin with. I along with almost everyone in this post don't even think it's racist for either of them.
-
All I want is for her to have her own story and her name in the menu screen.
-
@LordGlint said:
Ppl are just mad that Bubba is stealing Claudette's blending ability.
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/BWK67QT5RCXC/20191111014915-1.jpg
He's practically invisible in this picture. Believe it or not there IS a Bubba on the right side of this picture.
Lmao
-
@Frankie said:
Oh get out of here with this crap.
Wdym? If you don't wanna share your opinions then don't comment on opinionated forums.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1355580#Comment_1355580
Nobody says it's racist, just for the record. The person who made a thread supposedly calling this racist clarified they were looking for opinions.
I think you misunderstood my post. I said that I didn't think it was racist and that I wanted opinions. I said that I didn't think it was.
-
@Orion said:
Where did people say this? Point them out, please. I've been here for over 14k posts and only saw people claim that they saw others say it was racist, but nobody's been able to pony up some proof.
I looked up dead by daylight blackface and old forums came up for me.
-
@Mushwin said:
Yeah this isn't racist.
I find this hilarious because your picture is claudette😂
-
My friend didn't even get rank reset. She was rank 3 and now she's rank 4. She only got set back 1 rank for killer and survivor while she should've gone down to purple ranks.
-
The oni is my favorite chase music. I love the style and intensity of it. Demodoggy also has good chase music.
-
Bad example for a good skin lol. That's Kate's ugliest skin imo.
-
@Frankie said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1354523#Comment_1354523
The only reason I can see not to like people innocently advertising their content creation is because you're jealous that nobody would watch you. Cause other than that, they aren't really hurting anyone. Either that or it's a completely unfounded and irrational anger, and you should probably seek an anger management consultant.
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1354016#Comment_1354016
That's just you being a bad killer. Dodging 1000+ hours (time played =! skill, especially in DBD), and P3 cosmetics. Big OOF.
I don't have a twitch or YouTube and don't intend to. It's not that serious you're taking to lengths that are unnecessary lol.
-
She doesn't need a buff... and they literally just buffed her recently.
-
No. It has counter play and it's the ONLY counter for stealthy killers such as gf, Wraith and piggy. It's also an amazing counter to spirit who doesn't actually have too many amazing counters.
-
Perk name - Clumsy
When sprinting as a survivor you have a 25%/ 50% 75% chance of tripping and falling leaving you unable to move for 10 seconds... that's all it does. Also has a cooldown of 60 seconds.
-
I don't like when people plug their YouTube or twitch so I always bring an ivory.
-
They'd never do this any other time because it's bad business. Scummy business. And again, Halloween is not the same. Halloween is always at the same time. You can celebrate pride pretty much whenever you want. But Halloween... have you ever seen anyone celebrate Halloween in January?
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352846#Comment_1352846
Everything is pandering. Adding Silent Hill? That's pandering to the Silent Hill fans. Adding Leatherface? That's pandering to the Leatherface fans. Adding Freddy, Shape, etc.? Same thing.
Businesses have to pander to their demographic/customers, it's literally the basis for success. If they don't pander to the people who buy their products, who are they supposed to pander to? Why is "pandering" a dirty word all of a sudden?
Pandering to LGBT is a little different then to a video game franchise. For me it all boils down to the dev's dont really care... they're just doing it to make themselves look good.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352840#Comment_1352840
Nobody is assuming anything. Did you read my comment? Try putting yourself in my shoes for a minute.
Yes, they did shove it in our faces, you were right about that and I understand where you're coming from. And that last comment I made wasn't directed at you specifically it's directed for almost everyone replying to me. Your wording is implying that I have a problem with lgbt but not straight people
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352830#Comment_1352830
But for all we know they will just do that. That’s pretty much what the twitter statement says. They didn’t announce a new char that’s only trait is being LGBT.
The way they worded it sounded like they were just going to randomly out everyone. If they find a way to make it important to story in some way then it's fine. Again I just don't want pandering... that's all.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352830#Comment_1352830
They did not just say that Frank and Julie were into each other. Read the lore, they shove their straightness down our throats and it's one of the main driving points for the Legion to even exist.
Yup and that's too much you're right.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352822#Comment_1352822
Like I said, please go read Frank and Julie's extended lore. I'll give you a hand:
https://deadbydaylight.gamepedia.com/Tome_III_-_Escalation#Julie_Kostenko:_Soldiers_of_Mayhem
When you're done, read this comment of mine:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1351835#Comment_1351835
That's an example of too much. They didn't need to do all of that for them. And can we please stop assuming that I have a problem with gay people it's getting really old.
-
@Volfawott said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352812#Comment_1352812
Where was your complaints when they revealed that David had a girlfriend where was your complaints that they were shoving David sexuality down our throat.
Frank and Julie are a couple who are dating it is literally repeatedly referenced in their cosmetics why is that not completely shoving their sexuality down our throats.
I'm sorry but if you think revealing that a character with no established sexuality has a specific sexuality is shutting it down people's throats and then I'm pretty sure you have never encountered any LGBT person in your life because usually they don't randomly loudly proclaim their LGBT the second you meet them.
Why is it when the sexuality might be an LGBT one is it shoving it down our throat but when it's straight no one cares
Exactly my point. LGBT people don't go around saying immediately that they're lgbt and that's what the dev's are doing. They're just labeling them with no actual story behind it.
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352807#Comment_1352807
They were never implied to be straight. They were confirmed to have had relationships with the other gender. They can still be bisexual or asexual as far as we know. Even gay (at least in the case of Nurse, I am pretty sure the lore of Frank and Julie states they were really into each other).
as of now, they didn’t slap any label on any character. They just stated they won’t restrict themselves anymore from mentioning LGBT+ (and hetero) relationships or themes.
where were you when they mention hetero relations even though their statement was they wouldn’t talk about any sexual orientation for any character? THAT was kinda shoving it in our face. But no one complained. Now you are complaining about something they haven’t even done (yet).
What they did for Sally was perfect imo. They mentioned her sexuality or possible sexuality whatever just by saying that she had a husband. And when it comes to Frank and julie, again, all they did was say that they were into each other. All im saying is that I don't want the dev's going around saying THIS CHARACTERS BLANK. I just want them to add it to lore in a non pandering way.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352807#Comment_1352807
Go read Frank and Julie's expanded lore and tell me how that's not shoving it in our faces. Then tell me how a vague mention to a character's sexual orientation is worse.
Where'd you get that from? I think a brief mention of a character's sexuality is all they need to do. Like how they did with Sally, they simply said that she had a husband. BOOM... that's how you conform sexuality without shoving it in our faces. I still don't think it matters too much but since they're doing it anyways I might as well give my opinion how to add a good lgbt character... and how to mention a character's sexuality without shoving it in our faces.
-
@Volfawott said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1352563#Comment_1352563
How is it stupid if they decided to add it to an existing character.
As for pandering for the love of God everything panders to everybody when anything tries to appeal to it's target demographic it's pandering.
Besides the the most likely answer of I wouldn't like it what will be ruined or lost if they decide to make Min lesbian, Joey gay or Kate bi.
Lastly if sexuality doesn't matter and is the bottom line why do you care if they added to an existing character why do you care if they add it in general
I say that it's pandering because they're slapping the label on them just to please us. If they add a new character that happens to be lgbt then that's cool. But they don't have to shove any characters sexuality down our throats. And I'm simply giving my opinion.