Mandy
Mandy
About
- Username
- Mandy
- Joined
- Visits
- 16,619
- Last Active
Comments
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3290495#Comment_3290495
Best of luck with it
thank you <3 ngl it's scary to do, especially as I'm not the most creative person
Pretty sure we'll have some minor issues over the next few days, but hopefully the major ones should be dealt with prior to the forum coming back online. I just ask that everyone is patient and lets me know when they find an issue in a calm manner - so that I can get them fixed. We can put things on my wall as a known issues list there, so that I can work on them.
-
I wouldn't need to switch off the forum for adding in avatars, switching the forum off is due to massive maintenance that's happening which will make the forum unfunctional.
-
The forum is not the game first of all. Also, "toxic behaviour' is a something that's hard to define - there's no exemption from game rules even with Anon Mode on in-game. Same as there's no exemption from the rules here on the forum.
-
Hi, thank you for bringing this to our attention. You should shortly be getting a further email with another BP code - we apologise for the inconvenience.
-
Kill Switch Master List - Dead By Daylight we do have this issue acknowledged on the Known Issues list.
-
Hi everyone, thanks for flagging this. You should shortly be receiving a further email with more BP!
-
I think this is from the website sign up yes?
-
@sizzlingmario4 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3284638#Comment_3284638
If it helps, I believe this interaction with the fountains changed a few patches ago when Plague’s infection was fixed to properly show survivors the Broken status on the right side of their screen (it used to only show on the left side where all players could see it), maybe that has something to do with it. Forgot about it until now, but this isn’t something new with this most recent update.
thanks for the further information...I never cleanse so it's not something I've come across in a match.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3284671#Comment_3284671
Mandy, this is where I think BHVR really need to state this at the start. As highlighted on the announcement it states the skins are available Dec 1 to Jan 4. Nothing about being back next year. Just some feedback for the team. Otherwise it just comes off as trying to milk FOMO.
It says it on the in-game news about them being back next Holiday season?
-
Yes reporting does actually do something!
Reporting things like DC's - no, because this system is now automated and we have the DC penalty in place.
Chat offences only require the report to be made in-game as this flags the chat for us.
Other offences, so for things happening in game, such as teaming as you mentioned - would require an in-game report plus a support ticket with video evidence.
-
@Jay_Whyask said:
So, are we changing our steam reviews to negative?
I feel like "removing cosmetics from the game so we can sell them for auric cells later" is pretty good reason to change our reviews.
Please do not spread misinformation, this is not something that is stated to happen.
I've clarified I do not know how these items will be purchasable on their return, I genuinely do not expect them to change and that those that are purchasable with shards now will hopefully remain so - this is just some time in the future and not something I personally can guarantee.
-
The whole purchase with Auric Cells when they come back is not something that we've stated - please do not spread misinformation on this platform.
-
Is this with any specific killer or with killers in general?
Is the survivor running etc when chase is being dropped? If you could get a video of this happening that would be super helpful!
Thank you
-
@bm33 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3284691#Comment_3284691
What about the ones that are being removed from the store that are currently available for shards? Will they be available for shards when they come back or after they're removed going forward they will be auric cell only?
I don't have that information at this time I'm afraid.
-
@Akumakaji said:
What I would want to know and getting confirmed, though: will the seasonal outfits become purchasable with shards during the last 4 days, or is the 4 weeks thing not a hard timer?
They will not become purchasable with shards, these themed seasonal outfits are exempt from that.
-
Whilst the cosmetics will be leaving the store after this seasonal period ends, they will become available next year during the winter season.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3284647#Comment_3284647
Thanks for letting us know.
I'm horrifically disappointed, and massively let down, but thank you for at least letting us know in advance rather than allowing it to be figured out December 29th.
I completely understand that...and yes, we did not want players to expect them to be released for iri shards at the end of December and then become disappointed, whilst I'm not bringing good news, it's something we did want to address as quickly as possible.
-
Referring specifically to the current cosmetic collection that's available for purchase with Auric Cells until January 4th - these outfits will be back next year. They also won't be available for Iridescent Shards during this period, seasonal items such as this are exempt from the system of outfits being available for iri shards after the 4 week period. I do not have information on what date they will once again appear in the store (presumably this time next year), nor can I say whether they will be purchasable with shards at that time.
-
Hi, thank you for raising this. I'm checking on the intended behaviour with the Pools of Devotion - previously it was like Adrenaline so if you healed when in Deep Wounds you would still be injured, I'm not sure if something has changed with the Pools of Devotion, but I will look into it for you.
-
I'm guessing you mean the mask and not the character, as you cannot get the character in the rift itself.
And you would need to complete the rift to get the items that are listed in there.
-
@Kabanzai said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3284538#Comment_3284538
So.. Wait.
The one that was in question was not even behaving in an inappropriate manner at all. They were just disconnected.
But because it's included in a picture of a victory shot (the last person dying on hook) it's against the rules.
yes because you are naming and shaming the person that has disconnected...which has already been explained to you.
And no, the upload to blur all names is impossible on our end that's why it's a users responsibility.
-
@FilthyLegionMain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3284538#Comment_3284538
Maybe tell him how to edit images instead of saying the same thing. Since you can't do it for some reason, I will.
I think a quick google will explain exactly how to edit something, and as there are very many ways I do not feel it necessary to go through the steps.
-
@Kabanzai said:
But.. I'm asking why not allow you to actually have this so you can post without names? I have no clue how to edit baseline screenshots and my last few posts in forum are saluting the people who didn't disconnect rather than 'shaming' tho it does show their names it shouldn't be against those rules.
if you're showing someone behaving in an inappropriate manner and showing their name, that's directly breaking the rule.
We do not have software installed that will edit out names on screenshots, that's on you the user to ensure that you do not break the rules here when you post screenshots - if in doubt, do not post a screenshot.
-
And no, what you asked is not specifically against that rule, however when you deliberately draw attention to that screenshot in an effort to continue to name and shame players, then yes that is breaking the rule, which you've been advised many times now.
-
When you sign up to the forum, you agree to the forum rules first of all. The onus is on the user to not post things that are against those rules.
-
First of all we do not discuss bans publicly - not here or on any of our other platforms. If you have any issues with the action taken on your account, please respond on the ban message to the moderator.
-
In the game no I'm afraid you cannot use Paypal.
-
@vladspellbinder said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3282204#Comment_3282204
My idea was it would apply BEFORE going into a lobby, so people only get matched up with other with matching block lists. You're waiting for a lobby not in the lobby.
As for the other factor, if you are being blocked maybe you should change the way you play so people don't block you. And if people are being petty about blocking you for no other reason than the Killer you are playing you shouldn't want to play against them in the first place.
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3282206#Comment_3282206
See right above. If you are getting blocked then something you are doing is wrong. Change how you play. Though of course some people will block you just to block you but, again, you shouldn't want t play with those people anyways.
Of course I don't have a "Main" Killer that I play, so if someone only ever exclusively plays Nurse and refuse to play any other Killer that is on them for not changing how they play and they should have to wait for games so they can play against people who enjoy or at the very least don't mind playing against Nurse.
I put no stock in the "You bought the game, you can play how you want." argument when it comes to a multiplayer games. As soon as your actions start impacting another person it does matter "how you play". In a multiplayer game you are entering a social contract that everyone is there to have fun and you shouldn't do thing that stop people from having fun. If you play in such a way that the majority of people don't want to play against you then you are part of the problem. If that problem is that you play Nurse and Nurse is the problem then branch out and play other Killers until such a time that Nurse is fixed to not be problematic.
At the end of the day I am sick and tired of playing against the same toxic Killer players three to five times a night and every single game I have with them is anywhere from five minutes to an hour of misery depending how they play. I do not not have any fun against these people because they go out of their way to make every match with them as not-fun as possible for the sole fact they get enjoyment out of running other people's fun, they are breaking that social contract I mentioned before. This is a straight up fact some of them have told me in end-of-game chat about why they play they way they do, that they do it because they know people hate it. If I am not having fun why should I bother to continue to play the game? If blocking these toxic people actually made my games more enjoyable I'd be willing to play more often and actually go back to recommending this game to others. As it is right now I do not recommend the game to others because of how toxic a good amount of the player base is and how I'm really only playing any more out of Stockholm Syndrome and chasing the one in fifty fun games.
I'm sorry but no, if someone is not breaking the game rules they can play the character and the way they want to play - they should not be prevented for playing a character because someone doesn't want to play against that character. This is one of the main reasons we will not have a block list for things like this.
-
They should now be in the right place...finally!
-
Sadly yes, they are below and I have absolutely no way of manually moving them despite many attempts :(
-
@vladspellbinder said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3282117#Comment_3282117
And I'm saying that is an individual problem. If you are given a tool and you misuse that tool it is not the tools fault. Should we take away every single hammer just because some people hit their hands with them when trying to drive nails? No.
If you give people more control over their match-matching and they use that control in such a way that prevents them from getting any matches at all that is their fault, not yours. You also need to give them the control to undo the first part so they can have an easier time finding matches again but by default if someone is willing to wait longer times to get games they find more enjoyable you should allow that.
If people want to block every Killer player that plays Nurse or Blight or Spirit or Knight or Twins or whomever and then they complain about long match-making times you first ask them "Did you block every Killer player you went again just because of the Killer they played?" and tell them they need to unblock people then and it is their own fault they have to wait so long. Make it VERY CLEAR that by blocking people it WILL make their match making take long and the only person to blame for it is themselves for using the tool they were given in that way.
I really do not understand the "Someone people would misuse this feature" as a valid argument, especially in this case as they only people they would be 'hurting' would be themselves. At the end of the day having this feature would benefit more people than it would hinder, and the people it would hinder would only be hindered by their own hands. They would very quickly learn to not block people for petty reasons and use it as intended or just continue to suffer long queue times. It just needs to be made VERY OBVIOUS that the reason they have longer queue times is because they blocked the majority of their options and have to unblock some to go back to more acceptable queue times.
unfortunately, that's not the way it works...it's the player that gets blocked that gets affected not the one that does the blocking. This is why it is not something that we wish to implement.
-
Whilst you say you wouldn't block people from playing normally, not everyone would take that stance unfortunately. And you'd end up with the situation where some players would be blocked purely for the characters that they are playing. This is something that happened previously when there was a 3rd party application that would allow you to block players...it significantly slowed down matchmaking and also made some players unable to find a match.
-
The protection on the items is protection if you die (whilst holding the item - so if the killer doesn't have Franlins for example), and it is not a protection of the item if it's used in the match.
-
Hello! Sorry that you're having this issue - we've reverted something on our end, please can you see if this issue is still occurring now.
-
Can you upload the video please @nicko_wit_ninja ?
-
@Chocolate_Cosmos said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3280763#Comment_3280763
Oh, nice! Thank you for answering :3
no worries, I would have replied sooner but pretty much only back in work today!
-
Hi, Hotfix 1 is not going to be today, it will be tomorrow!
-
Can we not call out posts being "joke posts" please - remember some players are newer at the game and something might feel very strong to them. Lets advise why we feel it's not strong - or why this would be an actual buff to Whispers instead of a nerf in a mature manner instead of just writing something off as a joke!
-
@skylarka said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3279891#Comment_3279891
Hi Mandy. Thank you! My ticket number was 1156066 and it looks like Noah replied.
Thank you for the information.
This is 100% reportable and against game rules, just want to confirm that so no confusion arises.
-
Hello, I am sorry that you've had this reply.
Can you give me more information on your support ticket please - ticket number, name of person who resolved this, thank you?
-
As GoodBoyKaru said - any 3rd party programme is use at your own risk...unless expressly whitelisted by us for example. Also there are some forms of Reshade that are not EAC whitelisted - it would be best to check on the EAC website for further information.
-
@Chiky said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3267512#Comment_3267512
Camping, Tunneling, and Hook Suicide fit to me in the "refuses to participate in a normal gameplay" option by making miserable the game for others :)
whilst I appreciate your point of view, please refer to the official game rules for guidance in this matter. As all those things you listed can be considered part of normal gameplay.
-
@Tsulan said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3267512#Comment_3267512
Rage quitting is on the example list for valid reports. Someone who is suiciding, is obviously someone who rage quit. Does that mean, that its actually not a valid report?
yes, it means it's not a valid report.
-
I suspect that's the Developer Charm that is given to BHVR Staff members only.
-
@Chiky said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3266979#Comment_3266979
It has never worked. Reporting hacker needs you to have a recording, open a ticket outside the game, and make a huge deal about it. It should be easy to report simple stuff, yet it isnt. So, until they don't fix it...
The report system does work, but only when you report for things that can be actioned. Camping/slugging/tunneling - please do not report, you're wasting valuable resources and time by making false reports.
-
@Chiky said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/3267273#Comment_3267273
As he said, reporting in this game is a joke. Wjy having a report system when you need video evidence of what happened?
I still report hook suicide, hackers, camping and tunneling killers, even tho I know they won't do anything at all
Please do not report for things that are not actionable - meaning not against the game rules. Making false reports can get your own access to support services suspended.
Hacking/Cheating - please report, the others on your list are nothing against the game rules, nothing we will action so that really takes the time away from other tickets which might be things we can action.
-
I've played with a few of you but you didn't know it :)
-
If you find any hook where the killer can block so that the survivors are unable to get the "uhook" prompt, please make a bug report showing the location - screenshot of the hook placement, so that our team can take care of it, thank you.
-
no, please do not inundate our support staff with reports that are not actionable.
-
I'm sorry but Legacy is not returning in any form.
It was something that was given to very early players on the game who helped to shape the game and put time and effort into the game when it was in its infancy and managed to prestige characters when there was no double BP, no party streamers even, and when the bloodwebs were much larger and a lot more expensive than they are now. We have confirmed that Legacy will not come back.