Hellrossa
Hellrossa
About
- Username
- Hellrossa
- Joined
- Visits
- 450
- Last Active
Comments
-
Same here, got the PS4 version from PS+ and just got my ps5. I can't update :/
-
How come this post got resurected? :D
Nice to see still going on.
And still from France here.
-
Top : Meg, Nea, David King
Worst : Ace, Quentin, Adam
Only based on native perks and skin -
Thanks you two
-
I love Dwight's scream so much "buwahohooo" best impression I can doBoss said:@Hellrossa said:
Boss said:Don't similar threads pop up like every week?
This week was empty, had to deliver
. Btw thanks for all the atthe answers, this is very interesting !Fair enough, do your part.

Survivor
- Nea Karlsson
- Feng Min
- Dwight Fairfield (I think he has the best screams when getting hit with the main weapon.)
Killer
- Philip Ojomo
- Max Thompson Jr.
- Freddy Krueger (Yes, seriously.)
-
Upvote for the waifu materialOnionthing said:Killer -
1. Spirit
2. Hag
3. Susie - Legion (The power is terrible, but Susie is waifu material ... shut up! dont judge me!)Survivor -
1. Nea
2. Meg
3. Jesus ... er.. I mean Jeff -
This week was empty, had to deliverBoss said:Don't similar threads pop up like every week?
. Btw thanks for all the atthe answers, this is very interesting !
-
Claire Redfield and the T-100

-
They should have work on their AI pathfind in the first placeEsheon said:
This. If you find an exploit, you report it to the devs (not on the forums) and don't use it.MhhBurgers said:I don't get how this is a discussion. If a player finds an exploit he should get banned if he repeatedly abuses it, this is commonly accepted for most ACTUAL gamers.
Hell, I almost got banned on my first day ever playing an online game, EQ1. A GM found me standing on a hill shooting orcs who kept pathing around the hill but not up it. I had no idea I was doing anything wrong, and since I was an obvious noob* he let me off with a warning. That was the only lesson I ever needed.
*Among other things, I was leaving the belts to rot because they were "worthless".
-
@Kilmeran said:
@Hellrossa I get what you're saying, but sometimes it's just not the reality of the job. I've worked in game design in the past. Even for a studio as large as Blizzard, which Behavior is not, there are still limited people on the team to handle bug and exploit fixes, some are easier to find in the code than others, and limited time to work on a particular one if other ones have to take priority.The bottom line has always been: Until it is fixed, using it repeatedly will get a player banned. They were absolutely right in banning OchiDO for what he did. He knew better than to show how to do them on his Streams. He wasn't new to gaming. He did it because he's an arrogant little twat, and rightfully got banned.
I don't say that OchiDO don't deserve his ban, he has tons of reasons to get banned.
This apart, I know the constraint of making video games (I work in the industry too) and of course fixing an issue can take time depending of the amount of people available to fix it and the difficulty of the fix itself. I just don't think it's fair to ban people for something that could be avoided and most of all because players are not responsible of the exploit being here.
I do agree with you that streaming the exploit and making a "tutorial" to explain how to get it can be detrimental, especially for someone who has as much views as Ochido. But that's removing something from someone that had paid for it, I don't know if Devs usually send warnings before banning someone. If not it might be more fair.
-
@MhhBurgers said:
Uh no, if the community finds an exploit the community is still being punished in most games where the dev's have some selfrespect over salesnumbers.Look at WoW, tons of people exploited warmode by wintrading, they got banned, the exploit never got fixed.
Duping is also an exploit found often in RPGs, guess what. You get banned for abusing it.Of course, but imo they should have fix the issues instead of banning people.
-
@Kilmeran said:
@Hellrossa said: All these reasons are good to ban someone. Except the exploit one, this is not the players fault to use exploit. They are results of bugs or bad design that has to be fixed by devs.
If they are in the game, then they're permitted. Nowaday we can patch a game easily so exploits shouldn't be an issue for too long.
But I understand the point

And every major game developer would disagree with you. I know of no development studio that allows the intentional reveal of an exploit, never mind the repeated reveal and showing how to use it, like he did. Developers are very clear that a discovered exploit should be reported via a Bug Report and never posted on the forums. That guy was asinine enough to do it more than once on his Stream.
And repeatedly using an exploit in the game will also get you banned if discovered. This is true of every online game I have played over the past 20 years.
Whether or not it can be fixed or patched quickly and isn't, it has always been: stumble upon it, fine, but don't use it again. Use it repeatedly, and expect a ban. Fair or not, it's their rules. Again, it's not just a Behavior thing, pick your online game.
Your opinion is totally legit and I understand it. However if an exploit is found by the community and not by the dev (or they didn't have the time to fix it but that's another story), they can't blame the community for using it.
This is like finding the best strategy to win and using it even if this is a result of a bug. A bug shouldn't be there in the first place and the players don't have to bear the responsability. Lots of people here complain about some overpowered perks for example. Well that's in the game and people are using them, they can so they do, if they are overpowered then the design should be modified.
This is the same with an issue/bug/exploit, this is in the game because of the devs and that's their responsability to do something about it, I think (and all of this text is my opinion, not the absolute truth) players shouldn't be punished for devs mistakes.
Studios are doing this for the past 20 years, this is true, but it doesn't mean they should have been doing it.
Sorry if all this seems messy, English is not my first language.

-
-
@Oblitiry said:
Spoiler alert! The generator was 2 feet from the hook hue hue.For real camp or no camp it doesn't matter. Just play the game and move on. If you get hate mail just tell them GG, if you wanna tease them then say "You're the worst piñata, all salt and no candy"
haha I love that quote. Indeed the gen wasn't that far, and bing bong is fast while cloaked ^^
-
Thanks everyone
, I was a bit worried
-
I could see that for the maps, I did well on the gameDabrownman1812 said:
Not built for tunneling. Any killer can tunnel, she gets a quick second hit with the phase walk. Don't fully drain her fully without recharge add ons. Go for whoever you want. You see an injured same with any other killer, go for them, slug them if a healthy is nearby and go after the healthy. If you let the healthy go, you have 3 people working on gens. The spirit is better on the game and the institute.DeadByFlashlight said:@Hellrossa said:
Hello fellow killers,I tried playing the Spirit recently and even if I didn't do very well (thanks Rancor...) I had a lot of fun playing her. It's nice to surprise survivors by appearing next to them.
Do you have any tips for playing her? I'm rank 11 and the only meta-perk I have is Nurse calling (no BBQ or whatever).
Many thanks !
She is a killer built for tunneling, just like leatherface was built for camping.
Dont try to distinguish between different survivors in phase walk, always go for the injured (moaning) one, even though if survivors will be salty afterwards.
Also I have heard that for devour hope and MYC, the distance of the husk is actually the relevant one, but I havent tested it myself yet
-
Guys ! I killed 3 people for the first time with Spirit (the last one escape through the hatch).
The map helped me a lot (the game), so far I had only mcmillan and coldwind farm, I always loose them there. -
Thank you both !
I really have to get Ruin, it annoys me as a survivor
.
I'll train with her and loose a few ranks in the process but I think she's great. -
Pig and Freddy ( he's strong 💪)
-
Exactly what I had !RSB said:I'm on PC, but I had several issues with kicking me out of match, out of lobby and with "This game requires internet connection".
-
Buff the network plz (frustrated player that can't get his dbd fix tonight)
But I'm all love. -
Europe for me (France)
-
Might be a territory thing thenfcc2014 said:Been playing other than long lobby times everything else was ok
. Thanks for the reply
-
Haha I feel you !
-
fcc2014 said:
@Hellrossa said:
Stop fightiiiiing
OK Mom
No hanging with friends for two weeks fcc ! 
-
Stop fightiiiiing
-
EXACTLY haha.
Still, some people are able to play him rank 1 (not me obviously). And the sweater is frightening you have to admit. -
Thank you you both ! What is m&a ?
-
Let me live if we share a game hahaNo_Mither_No_Problem said:@Hellrossa said:
Country of baguette and cheese here.French Killer with stale baguette weapon when
-
I play on ps4 and had no major bugs so far and no cheaters.
Control and framerate are ok except if she wants to play the nurse which can be tricky with a controller. -
Thanks I didn't know that ! I suck with LF but might be a reason to play with him.ChesterTheMolester said:
Yes, there are 4 masks based on the 4 original survivors. I still need the Jake mask, i feel sorry for the Jakes i have to blatantly facecamp to get it.Hellrossa said:Wait what?? You can have the survivors faces when sacrificing them??? -
I won't ! Everyone like what/who they want
-
Let's say both ! But yes I was talking about the meme ^^Vietfox said: -
Aww i like neaMister_Holdout said:I feel like that would make people hate Nea even more.
-
I'd be interested to know the origin of itVietfox said:Why nea became a killer meme thing? She's hot (yeah, i like lesbian looking girls) -
Now you said this I don't know if I'll be able to sleep tonight :'(
-
All these reasons are good to ban someone. Except the exploit one, this is not the players fault to use exploit. They are results of bugs or bad design that has to be fixed by devs.Soren said:@jamesdon18 said:
You can also get hardware banned for being good in this game and looping people for whole games remember that lol.That's actually not true at all. Looping is not bannable.
If you're talking about Ochido, he was banned for:
- exploit (several times) and showing how to use these exploits,
- griefing (sandbag on purpose other survivors, ruining their game experience by coop with the killer),
- witch hunting (asking his community to mass-report a killer he played against),
- trying to avoid ban with several accounts,
- hacking his progress (as an example, he had a P3-50 Clown at rank 1 the day after the release of Clown, which was rank reset, and with XP still at level 1... literally impossible without hack).
If they are in the game, then they're permitted. Nowaday we can patch a game easily so exploits shouldn't be an issue for too long.
But I understand the point
-
Sugaaar everywhere
-
Wait what?? You can have the survivors faces when sacrificing them???
-
We barely see him in the movie (still frightening though). What about mr babadook?
-
This is just too funny xDBoss said:Survivor, definitely.
Getting slammed by wood everytime i walk through a passage.
Getting blinded everytime i start doing something.
Getting stabbed in the shoulder every night.
Blowing up my electronics because they failed a Skill Check on purpose.
Looting my stuff.
Taking up a random piece of floor for the Hatch.
Sabotaging my furniture.
Calling me cancer and telling me i should die once the night's over.Horrible, horrible times i tell you.
For the topic, most killer would likely kill you (except Amanda if she doesn't get you by surprise).
We have to make the difference between scary and deadly. So for the scariness I'll still go with Billy and/or Doctor
-
I feel you
-
Je suis désolé
-
Yes my phone messed up and posted it twice. Sorry about thatVietfox said:Double post? XD
Again, from The Earth.
-
@Vietfox said:
MegaWaffle said:@Vietfox said:
Master said:
Hell no, no rewards for DCing. We need to REDUCE it by punishing it, not give additional incentive to give SWF mates extra BP
Wouldnt be a reward for dcing, would be a reward for survivors who keep playing despite the fact that other survivors dced.
To easy to abuse. Lots of people DC right before they get hooked (death hook) or right before the hook timer expires meaning SWF groups could just exploit this to boost friends.
What about this? People who intentionally DC (i.e. clicking on "leave match") automatically gives away some of their BPs from the pool to the rest of them. This way would lose BPs instead of adding 0.
Interesting idea, I wonder if it would be tricky to make it on the dev side
-
SovererignKing said:
Dunno what you’re talking about. People use the PSN app to see my name all the time. I get dodged constantly as Killer for being a known Nurse Main.Hellrossa said:Come to the dark side of consoles
where no such things exist !
I also get dodged plenty as Survivor just because my profile isn’t set to private. You’d be surprised how many Killers dodge me when they see i’ve got 92% of the trophies in the game.
That's impressive
-
Come to the dark side of consoles
where no such things exist !
-
Yes ! That's the spirit \o/Oblitiry said:Thank you developers for appreciation nice looking butts and not being shy about them ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Thanks for cool original characters like huntress and doctor.
Thank you killer mains that drop me by the hatch because I was bad at running away xD
Thank you game for always spawning me 2 feet away from the killer. You the real mvp.

