Raccoon
Raccoon
About
- Username
- Raccoon
- Joined
- Visits
- 26,454
- Last Active
Comments
-
Will the Freddy rework pan out?!?!
-
Killers and Survivors should all have voice lines/sound clips they can use mid-match for taunts, gloats, and distractions.
-
I really hope they add some more cool "Dream World" effects like when the Generators spurt blood.
-
Rockin' some Dokken
-
@MegaWaffle said:
@Raccoon
Come this Halloween there will be only one true mask to wear.
Stalking intensifies!This was an excellent repartee!
-
@Cypraz said:
Freddy's Children I understand but Freddy's bitches? Makes no sense. -
MORE SOULS!
-
DarkWolf....DarkLycan....
Hmmmmm -
"FREDDY'S BITCHES"I_am_Negan said:@powerbats said:
@I_am_Negan said:
I have no need for d-strike so they can do whatever they want with it.
How come there's no Kate or spirit avatars on here?In the meantime join the sacrificial I mean beneficial society of leather faces. We hold daily basement meetings, have BBQ's and talk about all things salty.
Sounds like a KILLER party
-
LOL
-
The counter play is filing a report that will never be read.
-
If we're being honest, I do appreciate your honesty.
-
As previously mentioned, a solution requires a problem.
-
fDC2018 is reaching meme status :ohnoes:Giche said:@fcc2014 said:
I'm not going to sit on the ground and bleed out because you NEED to find that last person to secure your "victory" if crows start circling i'm out. If you are using it in the middle or beginning of the game to slug with knockout and or 3rd seal that is different and an actual strategy. 2 dead 1 downed and you leave them to find the fourth is not the same game play.
The entitlement... it's over 9000 !!!
-
Don't mock fDC2018's patented technique!
-
That's an interesting way to say, "Rage quit during unfavorable end game scenarios."
I'm sure this is the only scenario where you mash that DC ;3 -
That's great.
You should buy one for the next time you're slugged.
-
Nice diatribe.
However you try to spin it, ruining someone else's game for YOUR mistakes (or because you can't handle a legitimate strategy) is scummy. -
I guess easy mode doesn't include dc'ing so someone else can get the hatch instead of playing it out when downed.fcc2014 said:@Tsulan said:
Meh...
When you mock deranking killers, but play SWF with noob ranked survivors to get matched against low rank killers.I play both sides solo and with friends and my swf (when i play with them are all also rank 1). Quitting for easy games is worth mocking. Why play anything on easy mode?
It's not like you literally just advocated for this "playstyle" in a recent thread. -
It'd be a real shame if this highlight of scummery dropped from the front page
-
The posters advocating for the "DC Strategy" make me sadder than the ending of The Notebook.
-
This is done to "get one over' on the killer, but is as dumb and childish as a killer disconnecting after being looped or stunned once (bonus points if there's an Escape Cake / BPS or high value offering in play). I mean, how dare they waste MY time with in-game mechanics @_@.
If you can't handle being in Dying State, in a game called Dead by Daylight, perhaps the game is not for you.
-
Change Decisive Strike to "Desperate Struggle," make it activate (instant for all) ONLY if the survivor has been hooked twice, make the success zone 5%, and act the same upon success.
Upon failure, the killer auto-moris the survivor, after dropping them in disgust.
You're forced to use it if you meet the requirements, it can still swing games, and it has a huge punishment.
-
I'd like to note that I like almost all of the other changes, too, barring the lack of a DS rework.
-
[X] Complaining about a camping Wraith or Freddy
BINGO!
-
Amanda's Letter is really good.
Why do you think it isn't?
-
If you can't have fun without an imaginary ruleset, the uninstall option is always there.
-
Rational players don't care about:
-Camping
-Tunnelling
-Looping
-Slugging
-Instant Downs
-Gen Tapping
-Item/Add-On/Killer/Perk Selection
-SWF/Voice-Comms (recent convert, myself)
-Moris
-Death in a game called Dead by Daylight
-Teabagging
If any of these non-offensive (literally) things bother you, your HDD will probably be thankful for the extra space.
You'll run into frustrating/"unfair" matches on either side of the game, but the harder you have it, the more you will adapt/compensate.
-
Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh-Luigi
-
I have a list of users that have told me to kill myself/said that they'd harm or violate my family/threaten doxxing/hurl racial insults that have never been banned despite filing reports properly with video evidence.
I guess that makes BHVR my nemesis.
-
Sharing game saves is endorsed by the devs?
Please provide a link where they state this. -
Fixed a bug that prevented a sense of entitlement.
-
Much like Jesus, microtransactions are The Way.
-
YOU GUYS STOP MAKING SENSE OR HE WILL UNINSTALL T_T
-
@PapaCthulhu said:
@ZombieGenesis said:
Maybe stop being the first one caught.even if im the second or third it happens.
It's a global conspiracy.
-
Later, tater.
-
They should really just add their own in-game voice chat and go from there .
-
I'm beginning to think that 90% of the people that post on this forum don't even play the game.
-
Oh look - Individual opinion regarding camping/tunneling presented as fact thread #21964.
Thrilling and engaging. -
I'm sure BHVR will adequately compensate you all.
-
And?Dudddd said:For you to be able to see their feet animation about to touch the floor implys you're camping. -
When's the wedding?
-
What's everyone's opinion now that these changes are live?
-
It's currently bugged.
If any luck add-ons are affecting you, the percentage rolls back over from zero, giving you an abysmally low escape chance. -
https://youtu.be/oZlSoiE7YlM?t=101Actual footage of Devs 24h after the chapter's release can be seen at 1:41.
-
@powerbats said:
Apologies you got quoted by accident when I had 2 tabs open for comparison. It was another poster claiming they had stats and claimed it to be so.
The devs stats are wrong (not misrepresented as was their initial explanation of the SC pick rate).
I actually wasn't referring to that with my response but another stat.
"@Master and @Orion have both used those stats in their arguments but neither one of them is in here doing the stuff you and a few others are doing. They're not suddenly changing their argument to say the devs stats were wrong and they were lying just to suit their new arguments."
Also feel free to show me where my initial "argument" is and where it changed, particularly if you're going to label people as liars / accuse others of doing so and are quoting me, directly.
I'm not labeling people liars nor you and again see above about stats since that was a misquote attributed to you.
It doesn't really matter, though as
"and if they said it had 75% chance you'd believe it because it fits your narrative, you only believe stuff if it pushes your buttons and you like the outcome"
and your direct defense of it shows that you don't care what people type, and I'd be surprised if you read a portion of the things you "respond" to.Best Community.
Actually that's incorrect, I'll believe data that they have over made up stats someone else puts out. Also if you're going to accuse me of that you're also accusing every killer main on here that's used those stats.
So in other words @Orion @SovererignKing @Tsulan @Master I could add another 20-50 + to this list that all go by that number. We all go by those numbers until we have new updated numbers. The fact you'd resort to that type of argument to buttress yours shows who doesn't really care.
If you really think I don't read everything then you've obviously been the one not reading. Because everyone on here misquotes someone from time to time and we apologize the moment it's pointed out to us. If you'd actually even read a bunch of my posts you'd know this.
I don't read people's posts randomly, but I appreciate the clarification.
I'll agree, though, that misquotes are unhappy accidents that happen, much like gambling on a fart and losing 3;
-
That's a pie chart demonstrating the initial misrepresentation vs actuality.
-
(Take a free Awesome for being capable of civil discourse)
If every single person in the game, for a fact, brought Self-Care into a match, I'd expect to be told that there is a 100% chance I am facing it and not that there is a "25% chance it MAY be selected" in a particular load-out slot.
If you're stating that it has a 21/25 * 100 chance of being selected throughout the entire loadout, than that makes a lot more sense than someone just throwing out the 21%, and it should have been initially presented as such.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
@Wolf74 said:
Self Care usage is 84%.
Lol I know.
Just find it funny that we're still having this argument, despite a single survivor cannot bring multiple Self Cares for each perk slot.
Each perk slot is like 25% of your perk loadout. So why was it so difficult to accept that Self-Care usage was around that number?
Because:
Self-Care is a single perkWhether it's used in a SINGLE load-out or not is a Binary Option (Y/N)
Stating it has a 25% chance of being picked "per slot" isn't really honest, especially without knowing the rest of the build (IE Are they running Botany Knowledge to boost it / Not running it due to No Mither?), and the order it was picked (the chance of selection should increase for each instance it was not picked in Slot 1/2/3).
Show me where I said:
I have stats.
The devs stats are wrong (not misrepresented as was their initial explanation of the SC pick rate).
"@Master and @Orion have both used those stats in their arguments but neither one of them is in here doing the stuff you and a few others are doing. They're not suddenly changing their argument to say the devs stats were wrong and they were lying just to suit their new arguments."
Also feel free to show me where my initial "argument" is and where it changed, particularly if you're going to label people as liars / accuse others of doing so and are quoting me, directly.
It doesn't really matter, though as
"and if they said it had 75% chance you'd believe it because it fits your narrative, you only believe stuff if it pushes your buttons and you like the outcome"
and your direct defense of it shows that you don't care what people type, and I'd be surprised if you read a portion of the things you "respond" to.Best Community.
-
No smarter than you are for putting hypothetical words in my mouth and reactions in my brain, I guess.
Feel free to, you know, actually address my ONLY point of discussion referring the devs misrepresenting the 25% Self-Care statistic instead of trying to start a personal conflict, which you are so wont to do in your "discussions."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZhHVPTvOI
https://youtu.be/noLPhZvcBpw
https://youtu.be/gQuywxoFEFs?t=295