Mooks
Mooks
About
- Username
- Mooks
- Joined
- Visits
- 22,563
- Last Active
Comments
-
Changing survivors to double pip is not the right way to ‚fix‘ the killer adepts. it’s actually way harder to double pip for survivors than it is for killers, and then do this with David’s perks..
-
@Venoxxie said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1504736#Comment_1504736
*pats you*
I don't understand it either. I don't even see why people want more DLC when they want BHVR to focus on bugs and balancing. If people want Jason, they can play Friday the 13th and if they want Springtrap they can cuddle up to him in fnaf. We don't even need more killers, we have plenty of options, quite a few of them are already quite op enough for people to be happy with.
It’s almost like there are different people that want different stuff..
also Jason is even wanted by the devs and only thing in the way is licensing issues (and of course once that is settled negotiations with license holder and their willingness). He is the one most iconic slasher that is missing in this game.
-
@Immerschläfrig said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/178302/chapter-17-possible-ptb-date
Its a legendary right? Wonder who it could be after Lisa. Though Cheryl being the only survivor with a legendary getting an other one as well sounds weird.
It’s not that weird. Legendary skins were introduced with her chapter after all. There needs to be negotiations with the license holder for the other licensed chars and legendary skins don’t make as much sense for non licensed chars.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
I think it does merge them!
yeah they were writing something about merging the accounts into one, with the existing purchases.
we don’t know any details though and licensed content might be managed differently. Eg NoES on switch.
-
Headless Horseman (without his horse) from Sleepy Hollow
And Hannibal is iconic enough I think. While the other killers (Buffalo Bill and Red Dragon) make more sense power wise, Hannibal is way too iconic to not be a killer. And with him being a unique sociopath, cannibal, super intelligent and having a strong sense for smelling I think there might be potential for a cool power. Plus his chase music must be awesome. Classic music, but intimidating..
-
@IIITweedleIII said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1503361#Comment_1503361
But wouldn't that just.. bee ..Candyman without the.. be's 🥴
You mean because of the hook-hand? Because literally nothing else is similar about those 2. so we get two killers with almost identical M1 weapons. (Hunting knife says hello).
also throw Hannibal in.
-
I know what you did last summer is missing as well
-
@Ryuzaki said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1501708#Comment_1501708
It should be as Feng is not a licensed character.
That’s not how it goes though, there are plenty auracell only cosmetics for original characters..
-
Claudette with a plant based killer power or Ace with a power about gamble and such.
then the Hag with Voodoo based survivor perks!
-
How do you know the MMR scores of every player in that match?
no one guaranteed perfect matchmaking for every single match, but you don’t get punished as hard or rewarded as great if the scores weren’t fairly matched to not ruin your score because of bad matchmaking.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1498773#Comment_1498773
Because both would require talks with the people who own the IP, as well as the actual actors themselves. It's a tough process, so one at a time.
Both are currently not designed to look like the actors at all so there is no need for talks here if they don’t intend to design them now like those actors
-
The continuous of people not getting the fact that they don’t have to buy legendary skins.
how were 10 dollar cosmetics even that better than 15 dollar cosmetics? If you don’t think it’s worth your money don’t buy them.
-
Blood is also hard to track on most undergrounds for most non-colorblind people and the auras will not stay the way they currently are.
i am all for colorblind mode but pls don’t make it beneficial to use that mode for non-colorblind people!
-
@SloppyKnockout said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1496885#Comment_1496885
Nobody cares about EdgarAllenBro? Former Fog Whisperer?
kk
I haven’t seen or heard his name before so...
and FORMER fog whisperer? Lol
-
Oh I didn’t know this was about auras. They stated they didn’t intend this drastic change and are working on a fix
i did not say there is colorblind mode on mobile, but I thought it was, wasn’t sure so I asked.. if it’s not my bad..
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1496885#Comment_1496885
I call BS on your BS call. I also call BS on your idea that nobody cares about some streamer. I do. Disproved.
N-no, you can’t! O.o
whatever shall I do now?
-
@SloppyKnockout said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1496236#Comment_1496236
Agreed. I haven't looked at post game chat in months, lol.
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1496226#Comment_1496226
I'll call BS on that one. I've seen people conduct experiments on alt accounts, and nothing has ever happened to them after countless reports.
Even EdgarAllenBro has outright said "you can pretty much do whatever you want, just don't DC from their game".
I‘ll call BS on your observed experiments. And nobody cares about some streamer or whoever that is saying something.
-
There were never limited time cosmetics in the store and they have announced the Greek Legends collection like others before. Even the Hallowed Blight cosmetics are not time limited so I see no reason to assume otherwise.
-
@oh_0k said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1496780#Comment_1496780
There has been maps added without killers in the past
Groaning Storehouse, Gas Heaven, Fractured Cowshed, and Grim Pantry were added without a new killer
Groaning Storehouse was a map added for the 1st year anniversary
Oh I didn’t know about the game then and had no idea. I thought the maps of Coldwin Farm, Macmillan and Autohaven were there from the beginning.
well but they only added maps to existing realms I guess? Would be cool if they expanded the newer realms with only 1 or 2 map like this.
-
There is no power role, and there shouldn’t be one.
if talking about 1v1 the killer is the power role. It might take some time but in the end the killer would always win if the surv didn’t have a team.
-
@Enlyne said:
All I am hoping is they don't get over their heads with linked cosmetics, some are fine, but most don't make sense.
Most do make sense though and especially looking at the Greek collection they are not getting over their heads with it but have a reasonable amount of normal cosmetics and sets.
-
There has never been a map without characters added, so I didn’t expect it. Maybe we will get a Greek killer some day with a fitting map? I guess creating new maps is not worth the work that goes into it (assets, balancing etc) when they can’t charge money for it and are also working on maps for the 3-monthly chapters
-
Isn’t there a colorblind mode in the mobile version? If so that might actually be a sign that they will add it later to the ‚normal‘ version, like they are apparently doing with the bots..
also aren’t there already colorblind people playing the game? I mean it’s not like they can’t play at all, and you can’t make the game accessible for every disability, especially if others could use it to gain unfair advantages (and there will be people abusing it). But I agree they should really work on a ‚fair‘ colorblind mode
-
I fear the rift that will feature the Nurse because that will definitely be be one I won’t get all challenges completed.
-
Why are so many killers so sure that the survs were SWF though?
i have been accused of being SWF while solo queueing because of many different reasons (one example: second to last surv was hooked and facecamped, let themself die and I got the hatch that I didn’t know where it was before; killer insulted us extremely and accused us of being toxic SWF)
-
i am not a legacy owner but I actually „worked“ for the other cosmetics that got distributed for free now and invested much time during their respective events.
i am not bitter about it but if I had known eventually I will get it either way I probably wouldn’t have played as much..
so I don’t see their reasoning for the exclusivity of legacy valid - especially if it still required time investment to get it.
-
@InsaneNurseMain said:
I mean the licensing issues with ANOES ended recently so maybe this is foreshadowing them adding the dlc to switch and mobile
Wait, really? Do you have a source for that (just being curious, not saying I don’t believe)
-
Yeah I thought that challenge was stupid when I first read it but apparently it’s not about getting out when all 3 others already escaped. The way it actually is now is way more doable and not really that bad.
Promotes the waiting at exit gates when all survs are already save though. So more gate teabagging but now with a reason
-
@Pawcelot said:
The thing people don't understand about LGBT+ people, is that they're not dressed up in rainbows and massive "I AM GAY!" signs pointing at them.
But a Dragqueen is somehow dressed... obviously ;-)
but then again being a dragqueen doesn’t even mean being gay but it’s a performance art that is heavily associated with LGBT+ community.
i can understand that having a dragqueen as the only representation of LGBT+ would shine a false light on the whole representation debate. But as one of multiple LGBT chars that may not even be gay to begin with it could be a cool inclusion.
-
@RalfBehalf said:
okay i understand your intention to bring some "diversity" into the game and dev said it and all....but sexuality is not the main point here, I've seen too many people asking for LGBT characters in video games forums but creating character is not a easy as that, you can't slap a character with an LGBT "brand" and call it done, especially to the extent of drag queen.
you need to understand that not everyone will accept or ready to accept the idea and sexuality shouldn't be the main topic of the character, usually in video games they're very subtle with LGBT character and their sexuality, they need to stand out why they're special and what lore behind them that makes their story so special and not just based on the sexuality
The devs have made their point for those not accepting LGBT+ pretty clear on their Twitter responses, and I am very glad about that.
the problem with the written lore and including LGBT+ not just for the sake of it is a pretty good and valid argument though. But still no reason not to include it. They also have stated they already have a char that is LGBT+ but didn’t state who because at that time they said they don’t want to reveal the specialities (even though the chars have been created with that in mind!) so I assume they can write LGBT chars without making them bland or stereotypical, as seen by that specific char that nobody can guess who it is.
-
@andre70x7 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1490574#Comment_1490574
Sure, people who like drag queens want "representation" well they should go get some "representation" somewhere else. This is equivalent to going into a bar and having a band play "I saw the sign" It just doesn't fit at all. It alienates the base audience, if someone wants a representation in a videogame they should go play a different videogame than DBD. Adding a drag queen would be one of the worst things ever, for a game that's dark and gritty.
It would ruin the entire theme of the game, it doesn't belong. I also hope bvhr gets rid of some of the ridiculous skins they've added aswell.
There are plenty of drag queens with "Representation." But to be frank. If I see bvhr shoving that down peoples throats, I'll just straightup quit. Because by doing that they're legit ruining the whole point of a horror game.
After those rabbit outfits for legion and Dwight the elf, a drag outfit would be the thing that would make you quit? Because that is ruining the theme?
That is just a weak argument and feels like you are trying to hide the fact why you really hate on LGBT+ representation
-
@anarchy753 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1490574#Comment_1490574
That's the issue, they aren't "excluded from representation," they're what we see every time there's some form of 'gay' representation. It's like putting in racial stereotypes then going "oh but that's ok because some people are represented by that."
A drag queen is not a stereotypical gay person though. They could just make the dragqueen straight (many of them are). They could also give that person different cosmetics and the drag cosmetic would just be something like Jeff’s Black Metsl outfit.
-
@anarchy753 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1490281#Comment_1490281
There's a B in LGBT
There is currently no B in DbD. Only heterosexual relationships.
i did not imply those chars can only be hetero, but the lore has excluded any mention of non hetero relationships while including hetero relationships.
-
@Viziation said:
Lmao
Of course the first thing people think when the devs mentioned LGBT characters is adding a drag queen
Yeah. Clearly the first thing that came after that tweet.
actually it’s almost always those that „don’t care“ but also think „it wouldn’t fit“ that are coming first when LGBT is mentioned.
-
@Walker_of_the_fog_96 said:
I think bhvr's idea is not to give sexual preference to its characters, so players can identify with their own survs and killers. So both a homosexual person and a heterosexual person can feel identified with David King, Yui Kimura, Jake Park, etc.
Why? because these characters have no sexual preference.
and I think it should stay like this.
You mention David King, but the fact that they actually revealed that he had a girlfriend is one of the reasons why the devs revised their original statement of not giving sexual preferences because they have contradicted themselves multiple times. (Nurse, Joey+Julie, David King, Ace [outfit descriptions])
it didn’t stay like this since Nurse. They can’t revert it now but they can start not excluding other relationships than hetero ones. And that’s what they want to do.
-
@Auron471 said:
As a furry, can we get a survivor who wears a fur suit? I mean. There is a disproportional amount of LGBT in the furry community, and thus having a guy furry character will knock out two birds with one survivor. :P
We have those Rabbit costumes from Silent Hill for Legion and Bunny Feng.
-
I would not worry too much. Even if they report you, a screenshot showing nothing is not enough for a ban at all, and they clearly have no real reason to begin with. Probably the rank differences or the fact you wouldn’t farm after the DC. You won’t get banned just because someone makes a report without evidence.
-
I wouldn’t mind a dragqueen but don’t make it over the top. Have a guy that is revealed to be in a straight relationship but happens to be a drag performer. Give him his everyday clothes and his performance clothes.
people here can’t even comprehend the idea that a dragqueen might not be gay XD kinda sad.
also pls don’t add a „real person“ to the game as survivor, they made a point to not add killers directly based on real world killers and that’s something that really wouldn’t fit in the game.
-
Yeah I noticed something off with a Nancy in one match as well.
especially the head position while running next to the end game scoreboard looked really weird..
-
Xbox will not be supported and may never be..
steam/windows store/switch/stadia will come september
-
Read the patch notes
only the switching was disabled for future matchmaking changes.
-
finally totally non biased but reasonable suggestions. :)
-
I have never encountered this bug, neither on killer nor survivor side (killer always finds me)
how often does this actually occur to those that are affected?
-
@Samwise444 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1479386#Comment_1479386
I think both sides exhibit toxic behaviors and they shouldn't. I would want the killer to change their behavior too if they are intentionally being a dick. You don't need to be a dick to win the game on either side. You also don't need to rub it in other people's face if you win.
That’s how i see it as well.
but then there is no clear definition of toxic behavior and it’s really subjective. Some people just don’t see waiting at gates as toxic because it doesn’t harm anyone and match will end due to EGC. (Not my opinion but I can see the reason behind it)
-
It does make more sense for a mobile game though, this way you can play/train even when you got no connection.
PC and consoles are almost guaranteed to always have a stable connection, for mobile users you or the others in a match may loose their connection more often.
also code for bots was found in the Steam version and will also likely come soon..
-
@Samwise444 said:
All these people saying just hit them out, don't go over and watch them, do something else doesn't really address the issue that people are being dicks. We shouldn't have to force people to just ignore it. It shouldn't happen in general and it should be up to the survivors to change their behavior and not the killer.
But that’s exactly what survs are told to do when they complain about killers playing in a disrespectable way.
why don’t we treat both sides the same?
-
„I wanna be eaten alive by Hag“ - no one ever (I assume). I‘d rather let that other-worldly spider thing snacc me I guess.
-
I never said it’s equally from both sides, obviously it’s more common to see from survivor side because there are more survivors totally and more survivors in one match (4 vs 1).
but saying toxicity from killer only comes after they get insulted by survivors is just not true and totally ignorant.
i am not denying that survivors do it more often, but you obviously don’t want to see the problem from the killer side, which will ensure even more toxicity on survivor side. It’s a cycle that didn’t start on one side and doesn’t end on one side alone.
regarding the rulebook, again, both sides use ‚their‘ rulebook the same, and definitely not just one person at one time on the oh so holy and nice killer side. ITS BOTH SIDES. There is no better side here.
-
@MadLordJack said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1478793#Comment_1478793
Unfortunately, the rulebook "meme" isn't really a meme any longer, or else killers wouldn't get insulted and abused in post game chats for not following it. Unless you are suggesting that all of the toxicity and bullying is just a part of the meme?
All the insulting and abusive postgame chat is not only done by survivors but also by killers. And killers use also their rules such as forbidden usage of DS or Adrenaline here. So nothing survivor exclusive.
and if the survivors really use the term „rulebook“ in their insults, I will always see it as memeing or not meaning it seriously. I have never seen it used seriously, not even in the forum endgamechat screenshots that show all the toxic survs
-
If you notice they are actively taunting you and are out of your skill, ignore them, it’s really very rare that all 4 ply like that. (Also those people tend to do nothing but follow you even if you ignore them, not doing anything productive)
try to have fun, learn to use your killer power or a perk/perk combo to get the most hits or something instead of trying to kill as many as possible. That way you will improve and have fun.
Ignore the end game chat.