KweenPlease
KweenPlease
About
- Username
- KweenPlease
- Joined
- Visits
- 261
- Last Active
Comments
-
@justbecause said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2430643#Comment_2430643
Lmfao or when she see's Nea with full on cosmetics and wig and Brenda goes like "she's as fake as press on nails" 😂
Oh yeah. Check my second post. I gave plenty of examples ha.
-
@justbecause said:
As long as Brenda can speak like Ash and say "this is some scurry #########" and "Cindy my gen is leaking" I'm all for it
That's exactly what I want. ~ It'd be I C O N I C.
" Uh-uh. This hag is messin' up the floor. "
" Woah-ho-ho-ho! Lord! I'mma have a heart attack! "
If someone opens a locker and Brenda is in it " This is all me up in here! You handle 'dat! "
-
Idk he isn't the only one. On the survivor side they haaaate Kate. I could write a laundry list of why I believe so tbh.
-
@Power_Guy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2430580#Comment_2430580
'Cindy accidentally using the bed pan to sponge bathe the old lady.'
" Your mother was so happy when she had you and wanted to celebrate and she said " I've never tried Crystal meth and so she did just a little. "
Oh look; the low-brow humor I mentioned. Drug and body fluid jokes that aren't funny.
As I said; it is indeed my opinion. The movies are trash, the characters are 2D and not funny, and the jokes are either banking on shock value or 'lol, weed/drugs/sex is FUNNY!'. There is no writing talent on display in any of the Scary Movies.
I'd stop playing to avoid those characters. I hate them that much. 🤷♂️
Okay so the first one isn't sexual in any form or way . . . so don't pretend you had it covered or that you're exceedingly clever.
You're attempting to speak down to people as though you're on a higher level, you are not.
You're being pretentious and it's actually painting you in the opposite way you're attempting to present yourself. Not a dig, just something to note. It's very gauche.
I'm also not certain how you want me to reply to that. The only sentiment I can share is an honest one to the one you've shared in your final sentence and that is . . . that I can't wait to not see you?
-
@Power_Guy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2430577#Comment_2430577
Crappy movies get sequels all the time. Sequels did not mean a majority of people liked them.
And you are correct; it is my personal opinion that the ######### Movies franchise has no place in DBD, and the movies were never funny to begin with. The writing was trash, and the jokes were uninspired lowbrow humor meant to appeal to teenagers. It is the only series that would make me stop playing, as I would never want to look at or hear those characters in any of my matches.
I'd say 4 sequels mean that people did like them tbh. They would've done more but there wasn't exactly a plethora of mainstream horror movies after that time period. All of them were super realistic or hard to work with if you think about it.
-
@Power_Guy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2430560#Comment_2430560
The difference being that Evil Dead & Army Of Darkness are actually funny, and Scary movie is a series of bad movies with bad jokes made by bad writers.
And 90% of the jokes in ######### Movie were either about weed, or sex. They were a series of weak story beats to a bad plot, which was a foil for weed jokes and 'lol, sex' jokes.
I never thought I'd say 'I'd uninstall if <x> was added' because to each their own, but I totally would if it was ######### Movie. I would not be able to stand having any of these 'characters' (They barely have personality) in my matches.
No in your opinion those were funny. Just like in your opinion Scary Movie wasn't funny. Everyone else in this section disagrees with you.
Also every movie was a parody of mainstream movies that came out around the time in horror and sci-fi and it wasn't all sex or weed jokes.
Like small jokes to physical humor to references, etc. Like the small one about Samara " Doing really sick stuff, like hiding the remote. " , the celebrity cameos. The radio cussing Cindy out, the small handed butler, the pop culture references ( Monica Lewinski ) , Cindy's fight with the cat over using its litterbox. The Charlie's Angels montage. The fight with the Amish girls. Brenda inexplainably coming back without an explanation.
Cindy accidentally using the bed pan to sponge bathe the old lady. Brenda fighting the Jigsaw puppets and delivering a jigsaw baby at the end. The little boy constantly being hit by a car or something bad happening. Cindy sharing moments that are supposed to be heart-warming but are just laughably sad to that boy. Like " Your mother was so happy when she had you and wanted to celebrate and she said " I've never tried Crystal meth and so she did just a little. "
Just overall Cindy being a breathless dits who never has any idea what she is doing or talking about and Brenda being selfish and obnoxious. It might not be funny to you but they're MEMES after ALL these years for a R E A S O N. You just don't have to like them But they are iconic. :P
-
@Power_Guy said:
Please no. These movies are the dumbest garbage out there. Nothing but 'lol, weed' and 'lol, sex' jokes. They are not funny in the slightest and have no place in DBD.
Again, look at Ash. Have you ever seen what Ash is from? mmkay. Exactly.
and no that isn't the only humor in there at all.
-
@Firellius said:
Brenda Meeks, teachable perk: Might as well rob his ass
Anytime you stun the killer by any means, an equipped item regains 20/25/30% of its charges
I LOVE this idea.
-
Still the same price in USA
-
@Kira4Evr said:
I would 100% become a Brenda main xd
Saaaame they could even ONLY use her censored lines. I LOVE her.
" She don't love ha-self. "
" She is as fake as Press-On-Nails. "
You see another survivor " OH HEY, BABY-GURL. "
" EVERY-WHERE-I GO - I SEE The SAME ---- I need to do this gen. "
You fail a skill check " You lyin` "
Being camped " Up out-my-face Up out-my-face. "
-
Why was it canceled? We can't do anything to cancel grabs that I know of. This sounds like entitlement.
-
@Nos37 said:
They got the pets and the survivors mismatched; it's backwards.
Meg would more likely have a dog. She's the athletic, outdoorsy, streets type (what up, dawg)
Claudette, while tending to her many indoor plants, would have a cat roaming around the house.
----
Oh, but we can't be stereotypical in 2021...
I thought the same thing.
-
If it helps they're ugly cosmetics?
Nea's head was cool but ruined by the sunglasses. Only the tops are really usable.
Claudette looks like a young Whoopi Goldberg.
-
@Aven_Fallen said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2423982#Comment_2423982
Imagine dodging Lobbies instead of playing because you are scared of friends playing together.
Yikes.
I know right? Like dude . . . most people playing with friends aren't that good they've got a few weak links or it's only 2 people playing together who risk everything to get their friend anyway?
Like dude you want it as easy as possible huh?
Killers be like " stunning me is bullying me, flashlights are bullying, pallets are bullying, SWF is bullying. "
ALL games have the fact people talk over mic in mind when they make it. It's not going to make that big of a difference. I guarantee you. Because I've played with friends with mic off plenty of the time. It doesn't really make a difference if you're both seasoned. It only makes a real difference to the noobs.
-
I mean if they're doing a little more than that ( teabagging, hitting at stuff in front of you. Following you around like a weirdo. )
and let's face it, most of them who do do that do.
Then it is technically Griefing by definition, no? and griefing is reportable.
Source : Wikipedia
" A griefer or bad faith player is a player in a multiplayer video game who deliberately irritates and harasses other players within the game (trolling), by using aspects of the game in unintended ways. "
-
Uhm . . . but Nemesis' whip only hits straight . . . and he has the zombie AI's and came with completely different perks than Pyramid Head. Their perk sets they came with are nothing alike and none of their powers are anything like Trickster's . . . ?
Like it or not there are only so many types of killers you can make and so many perks. Sometimes there is an intersection. Don't like it? Don't buy the DLC.
-
Please be a lot. <3 I need new ones. For Kate especially. Plz.
-
@Emeal said:
You can't get into hatch with killer standing on it is the issue. Yet they can close it when you're on it. Are we solid or not? lmao
This is normal interacting, it has always been like this. The Killer is blocking it
HOW are THEY blocking it if IT IS ME who is on it and they just ran up?
-
@Emeal said:
There may be a problem there, Killer does have first priority on Hatch cause closing the hatch is faster than jumping in.
Its been a while since I have gotten hatch, BUT as far as I remember You only seem to be able to jump into hatch from one angle.
We would need to check:
- Can you jump into hatch from any angle?
- Can you crawl into hatch from any angle?
- Can you open hatch from any angle?
- The 3 above with Killer standing on Hatch too.
You can't get into hatch with killer standing on it is the issue. Yet they can close it when you're on it. Are we solid or not? lmao
-
@hiken said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2411216#Comment_2411216
imagine playing wraith properly right?
I don't think anyone ever has. Probably never will.
-
@Kwek said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2419418#Comment_2419418
I'm sorry I have to tell you that, but phrase "Fnaf would not fit into dbd becouse game is too high-camp for my liking" makes zero sense, is ridiculous, and looks like something a kid who's just learning words would type out. I'm suprised you actually "meant" something by it.
And yes, camping is not only intended, but even natural for the game type. You have to either be delusional or entitled survivor-only gamer to disagree with that. Even if devs said what you say they said(which isn't likely btw), they only did that to appease majority with sweet words, becouse let me tell you - if they didn't intend for camping to exist, it wouldn't be there after 5 years of game's existance
- Uhm , no it makes sense entirely. If you disagree that's kind of on you, it can't be wrong because it's subjective. You know that though of course, you're just petty and quick to argue to try and enforce others to bend to your view. You can't tell me what is in my liking anyway, which is what my statement was. You can't argue with me about what is too ___ for me to like, because it's basically telling me I have to like it just because you've got bad taste?
- Also the quote is from a stream they did on Twitch back in October. ( I don't catch them often )
- Also why are you trying to tell me what camp means and how long it has meant what? I used it correctly both times. ( I was going to be an English major but ######### am I going to do with that? Medical field is way better. )
- You're trying to make a point but you don't have any.
- Also camping gets you a point penalty. So they're trying to reduce it. They can't control your movement within the space only where you can NEVER go. ( Outside the map ) So there is no real way to 100% remove it. Only ways to discourage it. But go ahead, continue to be wrong. Further assist in embarrassing yourself.
EDIT EDIT: Oop I didn't realize at first I quoted Orion quoting you. I see now I was confused. So sorry to Orion if you still got the update.
-
@Kwek said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2419305#Comment_2419305
Wow, seems like you really don't like intended dbd gameplay mechanics, maybe you are the who should uninstall?
Too high level of camp... that's definetely something
They literally said they never intended people to camp and frown upon it, despite allowing it as a " strategy "
So quit trying to twist things to suit your view.
and you know I mean " camp " in that sentence as in something that is " high-camp " and not in regards to camping in game right?
-
Uhm being able to be pulled out of a locker you exited 2 seconds ago already?
and not putting my " Flower in the Dark " for Kate in shop already.
ALSO LINKING KATE'S LYRICAL GODDESS OUTFIT AND PUTTING A HAT ON IT.
-
@XLuka8001 said:
I know this is an unpopular opinion but i don't think pennywise would work in dbd, at least not lore wise since It is an entity similar to..well The Entity. Both are ancient cosmic beings that feed off a certain human emotion. Pennywise feeds on fear, the entity feeds on hope. So putting one in servitude of the other would be weird and almost impossible to explain
Not necessarily. Pennywise would obviously be a smaller and less grandiose entity by comparison to " The Entity "
I think he'd be drawn to the Entity. Acting like a beacon, attracting these unsavory characters. Their goals would meet perfectly.
-
Nothing against you, but I hope you're uninstalling.
Getting tunneled in a pizzaria and camped by an animatronic is just a new low I don't hope to encounter.
Also I just think personally that FNAF is just TOO high a level of CAMP in horror for DbD , personally.
-
I have EVERYONE in my survivor group calling them Mark & Tabatha.
Mark doesn't do much. Tabatha works harder than the devil himself. It's ALWAYS Tabatha getting slaps.
-
@NoOneKnowsNova said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2418331#Comment_2418331
Although I'd definitely be up for a third Yamaoka, it would have to be another great ancestor, or as you said, an Aunt.
If I recall correctly, the "huge anger stuff" stems from the fathers side of the family, so it wouldnt make sense for the mother to have it.
Oni's mama? Give him mommy issues.
-
But . . . wasn't there an " I " featured? As a dropped letter?
-
The FNAF chapter, if it happens. :/ I really love this game but I'm not getting face-camped by a stupid animatronic bear in a pizzaria.
-
This is dumb . . . why would you punish people for playing a game with friends..?
It's a game. Games are DESIGNED to be played with friends.
If DbD didn't want you to, there wouldn't be cross-platforming and the ability to add one another within the game as friends and also invite one another to a standard lobby.
It'd be like saying " SWF " on a shooting game needed nerfed. The POSSIBILITY of it being done is taken into account when they designed the game. If you're not taking advantage of something they allow that could POTENTIALLY be helpful is that not your own fault? Plus just because you don't like people who do SWF doesn't mean anything. Not every group is talking about what's going on in game and even if they were I can use the same SAD - PATHETIC excuse you guys use for tunneling and camping.
" it's a tactic " - " it's not against the rules. " - " The devs say it's fine. "
Except in this instance they've actually designed with this in mind and it's not because of obvious things like them not wanting to pay someone to go through the excess camping/tunneling reports that'd happen and make the tunnelers/campers leave/not spend money. ( Meaning they'd be paying to upset some group of people and get them to leave thus paying to lose money. )
SWF isn't broken. Playing on a PC obviously also assists you. Does that mean we should nerf PC players?
-
No thank you, unsubscribe. Don't want. Here is receipt, would like to return and exchange.
-
He is far from weak. Myers is the O N L Y scary skiller if we're being honest.
Infinite Tier 3 is a terror and scratched mirror is terrifying.
-
AGREED. Like I'm tired of only getting like 18-24k a match.
I've almost got everyone to 50 but also it takes a lot to get decent perks on characters you want to play.
and I played a LOOOOOT during the anniversary.
-
Michael Myers is the only scary killer tbh. Scratched mirror = OOF
Infinite Tier 3 isn't scary but it is severely OP and puts you at the edge of your seat.
-
I'm going to be frank with you.
Other people are going to tell you there is a defense for getting camped or tunneled.
There isn't. DS has been nerfed and is sort of situational, killers no better than to take the bait after they down you they wait it out. So it's essentially just buying you time, but time where you get to do nothing but sit on the floor.
Borrowed time protects who you get off hook, but not whoever gets the person off hook. If they're TRULY face-camping there is no defense to this because someone will just take that spot on hook AT BEST. The likelihood is it will end in two people being on hook because they'll just GRAB whoever is intending to go for the save, put them down in front of hook and continue face camping you. You - can't - block - a - grab.
Other people will say " try and bait " , baiting doesn't work on a freaking face-camper 9/10.
Your best bet is to become more evasive and self aware of your surroundings. Get ruin off the field ASAP. Creep around doing totems.. You MIGHT be getting found due to scratch marks so Nancy's perk " FIXATED " can assist you in that and will help you WALK faster. You should also try hugging the edges of things while looping around SMALLER loops around pallets. Things that aren't OBVIOUS loops like the " jungle-gyms " and learn to keep an eye on the killer while doing so in case they try to turn around. MILK the pallets for as long as you can.
My personal trick I like to do SOMETIMES is slipping a few walls behind if you've got a head-start and using Adam's " Diversion " by tossing it toward where you know lockers are at. He will LIKELY follow those scratchmarks and go to those lockers and open probably more than one of them + the time it takes him to get there. Giving you ample time to flee. If you're toxic you can also pair doing this with dropping a bomb behind them while they open said lockers but it's probably above your skill level for the moment.
Hug corners and use every wall as an opportunity to peek around before you slip out. You're trying to avoid chase as much as you can. Believe it or not avoiding chase will help you with mind games and ending chases.
-
@GrimoireWeiss said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2411797#Comment_2411797
Me too, her Rift was the only one I wasn't able to complete and I really want the hair :(
Saaaaame. I really want the hair too.
Her other hairs either are BAD ( the ponytails ) OR they only GO with the outfit they came with.
-
@Anniehere said:
Most likely recolors.
But no hat and not linked >:(
-
Let's not forget the fact you will NEVER meet a Wraith who doesn't body-block.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2411155#Comment_2411155
True. If they do skins for other characters i at least want them to have a unique voice, name and icon. And also backstories would be good but not totally required.
I mean . . . I would like all that too. I know Claire Redfield gets her own name but I'm spacing whether or not she gets her own icon. I believe she does though. I also think she gets her own voice because I SWEAR she is louder when injured than Jill.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
Seeing them in the game would be cool but i also don't like it when they put skins on survivors who could have been another survivor, easily. Jonathan Byers for steve is really disappointing to me for this reason. I mean, they are both main characters from stranger things, and he is more so than steve debatably so i don't get why he was reduced like this... probably cause it cost me £13.75... lol... damn:(
I see your point but . . . new survivors as in FULL ON survivors with how they've been doing things? Means they have to come up with 3 perks. FOR EACH of them. And they want to continue adding ones for other chapters and licenses so . . .
There are also only so many perks they can come up with y'know? I think more perk opportunities might show up once Boon Totems become a thing but until then...? and even then that's only a few possibilities I am sure.
-
@NomiNomad said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2410412#Comment_2410412
Oh, I totally agree. Or. more accurately, the Entity would probably distort Trickster's vision to be that of his former bandmates. Trickster seems a little bit like the jealous and narcissistic type, so seeing his old bandmates might motivate him to kill EXTRA hard.
Just like how it's theorized that Spirt sees her father with every Survivor, and Slinger sees the Warden.
Well I don't doubt that the Entity would've saved them in general. The lore as to why they're skins can be open to interpretation anyway. The Entity would never say no to making them suffer after all and it'd definitely fuel Trickster to get at them for personal reasons causing him to thrive as a plot point.
but yeah I think it'd be such a good idea. Gives an excuse for new legendary skins that people would REALLY enjoy I think and those who wouldn't enjoy it would enjoy what comes from them selling.
-
Well this ... might not help you? Because I'm partly recommending it with something else? and . . . it might upset them to the point they tunnel you? But . . .
When Bubba does that long chainsaw I'll pop in the locker during chase and let him finish . . . if you have head-on you can then stun him.
I assume you're already pallet stunning him as best as you can.
I also think STEALTHING is better than CHASE if you can help it with Bubba. Keep a REALLY keen eye out for him and maybe duck around at a medium distance from the area your gen is in if he doesn't see you. Blastmine is a great perk for Bubbas because once they kick it you can gain distance or stay hidden nearby and wait for them to get a good distance away before you return to your gen.
Using Diversion to toss at a locker far from you is pretty fun too because you waste their time by making them look around. Odds are they won't stop at looking in just one locker and will rotate the loop a bit costing them anywhere from 5-15 seconds. Maybe a hair more.
-
@eleventbh said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2407517#Comment_2407517
Honestly I've barely played the games but the people who constantly complain about them are starting to feel more childish than the proclaimed audience for the games.
So you're saying I'm " childish " for stating I don't want to play a game for introducing characters and a chapter I don't like?
and for not wanting to deal with more toxic children in an already toxic fandom?
I'm " childish " for stating " This is too camp for the franchise for me and takes the game into a place I don't like. " ?
I don't think that is how that works, but go off girly. Power to the people, feel your feelings chica. I'm proud of you for expressing your opinion even though it's wrong.
-
@NomiNomad said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2410389#Comment_2410389
I do, actually. I've read a lot of the lore. One of the driving forces behind some of the bigger names of the game, Benedict Baker, Vigo, a lot of them are looking for a way out of the Entity. Hell, Vigo might have made the Hatch as a way to skew the trials. They aren't dead until they go into the Void and become husks.
NO-SPIN is dead. They died in the 'real world', or whatever. For original characters, we don't know if any of them died. Most of them disappeared. The Entity took Rin before she died.The only one we really know is Victor, who was dead.
Well given how the Entity like . . . distorts reality within itself and stuff I don't see there NOT being a possibility of them.
I mean after all the entity thrives off of hope and fear. Who would be more fearful than his former bandmates? Plus they could always rewind back and say they've been taken before death. It doesn't say anywhere they weren't so. Loophole.
The entity would TOTALLY bring them back to suffer.
-
@NomiNomad said:
I don't know if it would work, as NO-SPIN is all... Dead. Ji-Woon was the only survivor.
Other than that, I think it could definitely be neat. I'd love to have legendary skins of more lore characters in general.
Oh, I don't think you know how the realm of the Entity works. They're almost all already dead.
-
@GannTM said:
I don’t know enough about Trickster’s lore to make an educated opinion on this but if they’re not crazed maniacs like Ji-Woon is then it might not work. Also were they as talented as Ji-Woon in throwing knives?
I said as SURVIVORS.
-
@Huge_Bush said:
Well, since I only play Claudette, this rift is very lacking.
I love that and I love your name.
I had to tell my friends who play DbD there is a Claudette out there with that name.
-
Yeah I agree. I only like Elodie's vest and SORT OF like Jake's jacket. ( but only in comparison to his other outdoorsy jackets. ) Compared to his hanbok or Stranger top it's still not great. :(
Missed opportunity to give Jake and Elodie some FUN summer outfits. We could've gotten survival gear ANY other time.
-
@Jessymay3214 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2407832#Comment_2407832
I’m defending my 3 gen that’s how I have fun. If I let the 3 gen die I lose.
No one said anything bad about you patrolling 3 gens?
-
@Power_Guy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2407832#Comment_2407832
No one cares that you don't like camping. It's the same song & dance from every entitled Survivor; 'Boo-hoo, I got REMOVED FROM THE GAME! 😭'
This is the Killer's goal. He does not have to ask you if you had fun first. He does not have to ask you if you 'played enough'.
The Killer's goal is to put you on a hook until you die. Be it 1 hook or 3. But entitled Survivor mains keep acting like the Killer doing his goal is evil, yet facing SWF sweat squads & Killers need to 'git gud'.
It's such a huge level of entitlement:
Killers: Facing a SWF sweat squad breaks allot of the Killers. 🤔
Survivors: Git gud, scub! It's part of the game! 🙃
Killer camps a hook to remove someone from the game (adding pressure to the remaining 3 Survivors).
Survivors: OMGHAX! Devs! This is an exploit! The Killer is toxic! Ban him! I bet I can report for this! Change the game so the Killer can't kill me...I mean, can't camp! STOP BEING TOXIC! THINK OF MY FUN! 😭
I mean technically BY DEFINITION ( not an opinion ) camping is cheating.
It's rigging a game by taking away someone's option to even attempt at beating you making it impossible for them as a single player to win. If you have a problem with that take it up with the English language.
But yeah sorry, but I don't think removing a player from game through removing their option to play the game makes you a good player. It makes you a bad player who is only confident in playing killer if there is 3 survivors or less.
So yeah, you should " Git gud " because you're playing with a handicap and forcing the game to be played with one when no one agreed to you taking the game hostage for another player if not all of them.
If you disagree? I don't care. I made my statement. You can disagree. I'm not changing my stance, you're probably not changing yours.