GentlemanFridge
GentlemanFridge
About
- Username
- GentlemanFridge
- Joined
- Visits
- 21,379
- Last Active
Comments
-
I like the first person ones.
Though the og 3 could use a touch-up, yeah.
-
Evidently, only the offering was killswitched, and not the actual map.
Funny, that.
-
Toxic... how, precisely?
-
What is game-breaking, dc-forcing about Legion?
-
No?
Coconut mains Huntress, I believe. He’s gonna have some hatred for semi-indoor maps from the get-go.
-
@NekoGamerX said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2935237#Comment_2935237
good for you that you get to see it all now we all have to wait that not fair.
Honestly, it shouldn‘t be hard to find. PixelBush often makes videos on the tomes before the full thing has even released properly, and he’s not a Fog Whisperer, as far as I know.
-
@catkillsmouse said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2935295#Comment_2935295
It's them. I didn't play much during that patch. But yup you can't do much with them right now. One was frozen/frosty in a match.
If you read the entire article, you’ll find that there are specific tome challenges that spawn them, and allow you to interact with them.
Tome 5, specifically, has those challenges.
-
Cope.
-
Corals?
Do you mean Visceral Cankers?
Visceral Cankers are Props that were added with Patch 2.3.0 to Dead by Daylight , as part of the The Hallowed Blight Event. Visceral Cankers were originally added as a secondary objective during the The Hallowed Blight Event in 2018 that Survivors had to harvest in order to fill vials with Putrid Serum. The The Hallowed Blight would spawn 2 Visceral Cankers in the Trial Grounds by default, which could be increased by using then iteration of the Pustula Petals Offering. Harvesting the Visceral Ca -
@Kweh said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2935203#Comment_2935203
Corporate pandering and you idiots eat it up believing an entity that probably only cares about money and shareholders cares about you and representing you? If they actually cared it wouldn't be so lazy and half-arsed. This company doesn't care about its playerbase, much less as an extension, sub-groups in it's playerbase. It's more face saving business talk we've seen a thousand times before by companies.
Corporate pandering for:
A free character
A free tome
A battlepass with purely optional cosmetics that aren’t even all that interesting, imo. Not to mention that if you complete it, you get your currency back. I have done so for all but one tome, meaning I had only had to pay up twice.
Stretching a teensy bit, eh?
-
@Viskod said:
Plague needs her own chase music.
Given that Huntress got her menu music seemingly randomly, I don’t think she needs a dedicated update for that opportunity.
-
@Pumpkinbros said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2935237#Comment_2935237
huh??? wait is there a way to read the tome lore early?????
devious person don't tempt me
Not without looking into leaked content.
-
I mean, every year boils down to the same plan.
Moreover, I believe the second picture was the planning of the stream itself, not a roadmap per se.
-
In theory, it’s possible. But it requires agreement from the IP owners. Particularly A Nightmare on Elm Street’s owners are stubborn about these kind of things, so I wouldn’t get my hopes up for anything to do with them.
-
@cozeeekitten said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/320679/new-pride-charm-pride2022
Is anyone else having trouble getting the charm? I type in the code and I don’t receive the charm
Make sure you select ‘Redeem’ and don’t press enter. That doesn’t work for some reason.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2934930#Comment_2934930
If it gets too much you can always ask for the thread to be closed 🕳️👩🏻🦯
Eh, that's not it, I do think the thread is important to have for discussions. I just wish I could disable notifications for it, is all.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2934913#Comment_2934913
id make a joke like "no that's too obvious" but that's what everyone said for pyramid head during year 4 lol
I'm not making another thread.
The david one has been taking over my notifications for the last week and frankly I'm tired.
well, this aged poorly. -
Oh goody. Now to speculate wildy over what the six means.
Looks like one of the Entity's legs to me. Leg? Claw? Who knows. The thing that stabs you when you die on hook.
-
Possibly. Nothing has been announced, afaik.
-
@Plsfix369 said:
Sadako who? All i see are Yoshis and even then they're not that many.
This guy? I’m not surprised he’s rare.
-
@Youko said:
As an LGBTQ person, I don't know if this will ever sit quite right with me. But I only speak for myself, as an individual of this community, so these are my thoughts. Feel free to take them or leave them.
On the positive side, I appreciate the explanation and thought that was put into it. I think self-discovery after living a certain way makes for good character development. It's also great to consult about LGBTQ experiences.
On the negative side, if it wasn't your intentions for the character at the outset, I don't think it can ever be truly genuine. Having the equivalent of a "coming out announcement" also seems strange and placating. In my eyes, the best representation simply exists without pomp and circumstance.
On the REALLY negative side, David King is not the "first LGBTQIA2+ character" in the game and the fact that this is missed is actually kind of devastating. The "I" in the full acronym used in the announcement stands for "intersex." If you've read Koji Suzuki's Ring novel you would know that Sadako Yamamura is in-fact intersex, as revealed at the climax of the story when Kazuyuki Asakawa and Ryuji Takayama discover the origins of the curse with Sadako's death at the hands of Dr. Nagao (referenced in Part 3, Ch. 11). The film adaptations favored erasure of Sadako's intersex identity, an integral part of the novel's depiction of Sadako as a proxy for the AIDs pandemic, and themes of trans panic and homophobia (though the book is a product of its time/cultural climate and thus such elements were presented negatively in the context of the story).
This was really a missed opportunity to return to the source material of the Ring and present Sadako as the face LGBTQIA2+ inclusiveness being sought and helping to restore her image as the intersex character that she is.
On your third point, you're wrong there in two ways.
Chatterer is gay, I believe. He precedes Sadako. Additionally, that's not the version of Sadako we have in-game. 'Our' Sadako, despite the marketing, is largely based on the Japanese movie, where the whole intersex thing was never established.
-
If this were implemented, what is the point of pallets anymore?
-
Slinger is hardly overrated. One of the rarer killers to face, in my experience.
You ain’t wrong with Feng though.
-
I think the rule is really as broad as:
As long as you would not be able to see the survivor enter the hatch from below (ie, falling through the ceiling because of the animation) the hatch can spawn there.
-
@KateMain86 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2932873#Comment_2932873
Its not. I don't play video games to see how well something from real life is represented in it. This doesn't feel organic. This doesn't feel natural. This was a very random thing to do to a character that has been around for years. Why not just make a new character if they wanted to do this?
Paywall + risk of being accused of tokenism.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2932856#Comment_2932856
Why do you care so much that they're implementing representation?
References:............................................................................................................................................36This is that article of your friend, right? I’m just gonna edit this into the OP, because this is the umpteenth time this has come up and I doubt it’ll be the last time.
-
@ThatOneDemoPlayer said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2932482#Comment_2932482
Base-kit BT would be an immense buff to the overall stronger side that nerfs the efficiency of the other, overall weaker side
Going sheerly by perk strength, I actually have to agree there. Though, I have to assume it’s not going to be the full duration of BT that’s becoming basekit. Likewise, I think something like Corrupt as basekit would just be a band-aid.
(Though, I must also admit I am rather tired rn, in multiple ways. My comment was a principal thing more than anything.)
-
None? Why would one perk becoming basekit warrant another for the other side becoming basekit as well?
-
I do miss it.
-
I have never seen a permanently sabo’d hook that I didn’t sac a survivor on.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2932272#Comment_2932272
That's quite the argument you presented. What's ignorant about it?
It’s simply not a choice to be attracted to whichever.
If you, a hetereosexual individial, decide to “prove [me] wrong”, it is a choice. But it is a choice for a completely different reason. You state yourself it’s out of spite. You yourself choose to follow up on that spite. One does simply not choose that they like men, women, or even chairs for all I care. You can decide to follow up on that or not, but that doesn’t change that you are attracted to that. To use your own example, you could pursue a homosexual relationship, but it is never going to be a genuine one because, as you said, you’re a heterosexual indivual.
As for the last comment, I don’t even know what you are referring to as “being denied”.
And about your comments to another poster, yes there are other reasons to pursue a relationship. Those are rational choices, once again not made out of attraction.
-
@Alphasoul05 said:
I think anyone who cares about a characters sexuality is a little bit childish in the first place. It's such a Twitter thing, too, like people right up there with buying DBD because they would be able to play a hot Korean kpop killer. I don't personally care, but I equally think that it's something that doesn't belong in a video game. It's like me saying I want a Democratic character, when no one cares about my political affiliations but I can relate to this imaginary, non-existent character more when I could just LARP in my headcanon.
Childish?
Is wanting to see yourself be represented as a legitimate and valid member of society childish?
How is someone buying the game for Trickster any different from someone buying the game for Myers, Pinhead, PH, whatever? That is a nonsensical argument.
If you didn’t care, you’d be indifferent to the ‘introduction’ of an lgbt+ character. By saying you don’t think it should be a thing in DbD, you very clearly care.
We can have a Democratic survivor/killer. It hardly matters, especially when the concept is practically only relevant to the NA region. Being any of the letters in the acronym is entirely different. It’s not something you vote for, can argument for and against.
-
@Bartlaus said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2088355#Comment_2088355
You forgot about Sadako.
’Cuz she wasn’t here a year ago.
-
@Piruluk said:
Its a trash perk now, designed to help killers win the game.
You take ages to set it up and you heal slower with it than with self care.
Using this boon throwing the game
That is incredibly false.
-
I’ve seen it in all but one of my killer games yesterday. I didn’t count, but I’m guessing that would be around 7 matches, and sometimes it was more than 1.
-
If it’s indeed original, my guess would be something to do with the spiders as well.
Which has me both excited and going “oh no” at the same time.
-
Wait, was this even ran by BHVR themselves?
-
@UnknownKiller said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2928239#Comment_2928239
Rizzo for what I read Behaviour was avoiding to give hints about sexuality thats fine allowing players to imagine it its okay but now lore gets more detailed and I see correct to release lore of a gay david but categorically saying david is gay or X character is straight is cutting the wings of imagination.
I dont mind behaviour release 50 tomes of other sexual orientations but saying this character is X orientation is like okay now my bisexual david is lay to waste becuz you wont release bisexual david lore later isnt it?
The David we play with is gay. Whether his multiverse versions are any different in that aspect is up to you, but to claim he is bi is not going to be accepted by everyone.
-
@UnknownKiller said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2928177#Comment_2928177
Becuz if david is categorically gay in all universes doesnt give any options for asexuals people or bisexual people.
Who said they are only doing David?
They can easily say any other character is ace/bi or even trans. Ace as a sexuality in particular shouldn’t be hard to implement at all.
-
Since when did DbD’s reputation as a bug-prone game become one of being prone to ‘shadownerfs’?
Come on now.
-
Aye.
Or, if you have a particularly sharp knife, or a chainsaw, just 1.
-
To me, Cheryls are the wildcards.
You can go entire games without seeing them, but they somehow managed to keep the killer occupied for 3 minutes on their own.
They can be gen-jockeys
They can be utterly oblivious
They can be the ones that will make sure you get out of that trial, no matter what
They can be the ones that want the hatch over everything else
Truly, an ungraspable species.
-
@Pepsidot said:
Unbreakable, DS and BT need to exist and be as strong as they are now because if they didn't exist, camping, tunneling and slugging all game would be buffed greatly. So I don't understand why these perks are really complained about (except some concerns about BT body blocking although I think that should be a thing).
I understand your frustrations with DH, CoH and IW though.
Entirely irrelevant, but did we play together the other day?
I believe it was versus a Bubba that wound up camping the basement on Grim Pantry. I was a Felix and you (or someone with your name) were Nancy.
-
There have been “I’m leaving” threads for years. At the very least, since I was active on the forums.
-
@Agt_Scully said:
The challenge states, "They will be briefly revealed in the Endgame Collapse." Does this mean the glyphs only show up in Endgame?
They can be found and interacted with throughout the entire trial, but their auras are revealed once the EGC starts, I believe.
That said, I haven’t played since wednesday, so I cannot confirm this.
-
MoM
DS
BT
Balanced
CoH (albeit with barely any effect)
You are wrong.
-
@Mdawgu said:
I wonder if people will start using homosexual characters to stalk and harass gay people. Then will behavior backtrack and just delete the content like they unjustly did to bubbas faces?
“Unjustly”
Yeah, no. I’ll be the first to admit that I had a different opinion on the matter at first, but the removal was absolutely not without reason.
-
Appearance-wise, og Doc used to freak me out. Oni as an honourable mention for his intimidation factor.
Story-wise, Ghostface, though Doc again as an honourable mention
Power-wise, there isn’t really any killer that full-on ‘scares’ me, beyond Jumpscare Myers, obviously.
-
Mhmm. I fell for this one before.