kate_best_girl
kate_best_girl
About
- Username
- kate_best_girl
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
Cant discuss on forums sadly :(
-
@GannTM said:
I hope the whole chapter gets cancelled <3
Damn that sucks...anyways
-
@OnryosTapeRentals said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2738637#Comment_2738637
Him donating to LGBTQ+ charities doesn't cancel out the fact he donated to anti-LGBTQ+ lawmakers.
Those two things are NOT on equal footing.
I'd ask you to consider what would happen should said lawmakers actually decide to strip away LGBTQ+ rights? How are those charities, who have no legal power, going to prevent that? How are they going to actually protect queer people should the individuals RUNNING countries and the legal system decide to criminalise LGBTQ+ people? They CAN'T.
So no, him donating to LGBTQ+ charities does erase the inherent homophobia of supporting anti-queer politicians.
What law makers did he donate too that are anti LGBT im not aware?
-
@AsherFrost said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2738810#Comment_2738810
Literally the exact same nonsense we heard about k-pop stans flocking in when trickster debuted... Still waiting for that to actually happen, but hey, it's only been what, 4 months?
Most kpop stans dont game thats the problem lol. And it did attract a HUGE audience of them so idk how it didn't happen?
-
@AsherFrost said:
For what it's worth, the creator isn't really in charge of it now, he's stepped away following the controversy. I'm sure he's still getting royalties, but the latest game was made without his input.
Also, the argument that it's going to bring a bunch of 12 year olds over is just not true. Wasn't true when people were claiming the trickster would have the forums completely taken over by k-pop stans, won't happen with FNAF. For one, the franchise is almost a decade old, so we already have people here who were 12 and played the first 3, they're adults (as much as any of us are) for two, adding a character from FNAF won't make this game FNAF any more than it was made RE by adding the Nemesis.
Ive personally never played FNAF, as I don't enjoy jumpscares and find them a poor substitute for good horror, however from what I understand, the guy in the bunny suit is actually a rotting corpse who kills kids for the hell of it, and the other animatronics are all also dead kids who kill everyone they see at night out of rage? If that's correct it definitely fits the feel of DbD.
In the end, I just want more. More maps, more killers, even more survivors. I don't care where they come from, so long as they are interesting and fun to play. You could give me Barney as a killer, so long as the big purple freak chomps off heads as a Mori, I'm on board to give it a try at least. Haunted looking run-down chuck-e-cheese ripoff for a map? Sounds fun to me. Either use FNAF or the movie Nick cage is starring in.
Dude the FNAF fandom is entirely children and twitter people now I can't even joke about this lmao. Trust me when it drops at the very least, the twitter stans will FLOCK over here and we have enough of them as is.
-
@GentlemanFridge said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2737723#Comment_2737723
Eh. Lovecraft wasn’t the finest person either, yet his world has been a massive influence on horror media. Cthulu and “Old Ones” in particular remains a prevalent concept. It’s even hinted at in the Archives.
Rowling has the same type of controversy surrounding her, yet her work still enjoys a massive fandom, as does FNaF.
Seperate the art from the artist, ‘n all that.
Isn't most of Rowling stuff taken out of context though?
-
@Munqaxus said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2733027#Comment_2733027
I'm saying the developers already have their stats and it's not showing CoH as being a problem. These forums are not a good indication on problem perks.
Least we forget the "Lucky Break" fiasco. The developers had to nerf "Lucky Break" because they were afraid killer-players would die from the seizures they were having.
What's even more funny about the "Lucky Break" fiasco, is the developers buffed it again, and it still isn't used.
Im sorry but unlike lucky break we literally get a COH every single game. Everyone is in pretty much pure agreement COH is extremely OP and demolishes most killers.
-
@lauraa said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2715992#Comment_2715992
Cheryl Sunderland kinda reminds me of...Ellen DeGeneres and....Adam Driver? With a dash of Angela Merkel???
"So ghostface I heard you had a fear of flashlights?"
-
@cantelope said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2715651#Comment_2715651
I'm not really arguing. I'm agreeing that sure, she could use a touch up, but I don't trust them not to over correct.
(this sounds kiss assy but its not I promise) Like look what monsters and mortals did. To me they designed her PERFECTLY in modern day engines. Something similar to that would be *chef's kiss*
-
Because she truly isn't good. In high MMR survivors know how to track you and they just abuse pallets and windows. She's not even fun anymore because now survivors just pre-drop pallets and camp pallets and windows theres no more guessing from the survivor side and as Spirit you pretty much know where they'll be.
-
@cantelope said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2715639#Comment_2715639
I'm gonna just say I agree with Laluzi above. Sure she could use a touch up.
Like Quentin needed one.
I just extremely doubt they would do that and not erase what makes Cheryl, Cheryl.
Like with what happened to Quentin.
But Quentin didn't even look sleepy he just looked...weird and unnatural. People keep saying he looked tired but he didn't he just looked old. New Quentin still doesn't look like Quentin but the actor decided that not us.
-
@Myla said:
I thought she looks Great. Like I didn't expect her to look 100% her Silent hill 3 model since that is unique to SH 3 and 4 but in terms of DBD and its art style I thought it's one of their better works.
One of their better works is the adaption of Steve and Nancy or Bill. Cheryl looks like a different character entirely who they just threw Cheryl's outfit on.
-
But she's not 18+...Theres a lot of characters in DBD who aren't. Laurie, Quentin, Susie, Cheryl, Lisa, etc etc.
-
@Laluzi said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2713660#Comment_2713660
This. While the Quentin makeover did wonders for his gremlin nature, and I don't disagree that he needed a touch-up, it completely erased every semblance of his supposedly defining feature - his forced sleeplessness and his victimization by Freddy. Now he looks like a standard prettyboy.
I don't want to see that happen to Cheryl. It's not like Cheryl looks remotely bad as she is.
She doesn't need to look like a 10 just look like she does in Silent hill or at the very least actually look her age.
-
@cantelope said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2713369#Comment_2713369
Cheryl is supposed to look worn down tho. She isn't a happy peppy cheerleader shes a burntout kid who can't sleep because of nightmares that are slowly creeping into her waking life.
Taking that away from her to make her genericly pretty kinda throws out a good chunk of what makes Cheryl such a beloved character.
She doesn't need to be generically pretty just look like she does in SH3. She looks like a 40 year old tweaker cosplaying Cheryl :/ Cheryl looked worn down and still like a 17 year old in SH3, here (Which is supposed to be only months after the events of SH3) she looks like shes age'd decades and gotten a whole new face. Every other character besides Quintin got true to media adaptions but Cheryl doesn't because "Shes a burn out."?
-
"Go play something else!" You realize if they all did this the game would die?
-
@Mandy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2699795#Comment_2699795
WHERE DID YOU GET THAT PICTURE OF ME FROM???
Stop spying on me Mooks!
Seriousness for a minute - as I already know which way this thread will go otherwise. We're having representation in DbD, it's being worked on with GaymerX, representation is important to many, many people, and if it's not important to you - great, am happy for you. But nobody doubt why representation is important to others on this thread - you can read back through the many threads we've had on this forum and that will help you understand why representation is so important - and also the link put by Mooks, that explains it better than I can.
You guys chose a bad company for ‘LGBT representation’ tbh. It’s just gonna be over the top media stereotype representation :/
-
Rule of rose definitely
-
@dugman said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2443127#Comment_2443127
They already said in the official trailer it’s dlc based on the “original story Ringu”.
i know…I stated this…
-
@Jago said:
Thats funny that none of those 2 names are the correct ones.
Just watch the original movie ffs. It's Sadako.
Oh my god I have I didn’t think they’d use Sadako because Sadako never broke in US audiences 💀
-
@ChurchofPig said:
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/B04IS6RWKUEB/screenshot-28376-29.png
"from the original story" meaning not The Ring that we all know and love
There's a 99.9% chance the characters are going to be from the actual book or the original movie adaptation. That means it will be Sadako, it can't be Samara.
This post was made much before the official announcement of Ringu’s chapter lol
-
@WretchedElk said:
It’s Sadako. Samara is the bastardised version from the American remake.
The remake is fine, but the original Japanese film is excellent.
I will get off my high horse now.
You won <3
-
Idk why they don’t do what identity v does and add a ‘get up’ animation thay plays before they can run again
-
@QwQw said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2697940#Comment_2697940
I'm afraid I've never heard of that, but I was thinking Outlast, The Evil Within, It, Alien, The Shinning, The Thing, and there's more that I'm probably forgetting at the moment.
Praying we never get sci fi stuff like the alien we need real horror :/
-
@BattleCast said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2667570#Comment_2667570
You’re forgetting the fact that the horror elements are a massive barrier to entry for many would be asymmetrical fans. Also everyone I know only plays DbD because it’s got the best mechanics and support than any other asym game, and not because of the horror elements. The horror appeal goes away 3 hours in.
The horror appeal doesn’t go away what. The theme is horror, the theme of the game has never NOT been horror and that’s what attracted most people to dbd. VHS doesn’t have anything close to that. There’s a reason why the only asymmetrical games that survive are related to horror. Friday the 13th (at its time), Dbd, identity v etc etc all have horror. Asymmetrical games that failed all lacked the horror element in order to go into a ‘wider audience’ and it just didn’t work because the wider audience doesn’t care for that stuff.
-
@BattleCast said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2667405#Comment_2667405
Simply wrong, VHS intentionally dialed back on the horror elements to make it more accessible to a broader audience. It's the same thing Fortnite did.
Yeah but here’s the thing, dead by daylights appeal was the HORROR not the action. An insane amount of people got into dead by daylight and only like it for the HORROR aspects. VHS has no horror aspects what’s so ever and tries to be a goofy comedy game which is fine but is it gonna be the dbd ender everyone says it will? Probably never. Not unless they rebuild it to be an actual horror game.
-
Tbh HSHS had much more potential than VHS does since HSHS actually had a horror element to it. VHS lacks the horror that people like in dbd.
-
@Clowning said:
She actually looks great. Does mobile David have an addiction to eating bees, or is he normal?
I’m not sure! I don’t play David enough to tell so you’d have to tell me ^^
-
@Rogue11 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2618645#Comment_2618645
I partly use that example because I'm still mad that I bought that hairstyle for auric cells before they butchered it in the rework. If they wanted to fix some of her older styles they could have gone for the ponytails and the 50's style because almost no one uses them with how bad they look.
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/40DS8D1RDO2F/image.png
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/L9QV0VTA7LVC/image.png
I agree with most of what you wrote here. I never thought any of the models were perfect, but many of the updates changed the facial structure of the originals to a degree where they no longer look like the characters we liked.
I think you may be right that its due to the animations making all of them look pissed off instead of scared/neutral.
Imo Kate's rework looks much better in the still shots they showed without animations applied. Same for Meg and maybe some others.
Stop you just reminded me what they promised and now I’m gonna cry 😭
-
Also what about yellow face? I mean Jake is Asian after all
-
It’s also used more because it’s one of the only faces thatre actually distinct. The other ones you can’t even tell if they’re using it.
-
@bm33 said:
A mod can change your name once.
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/kb/articles/207-forum-name-changes
huh never knew abt this. Thanks broski
-
@Rogue11 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2602056#Comment_2602056
They really nerfed her into B tier with that rework :c
What’s weird is she looks BETTER on mobile than she does on console/pc
-
@Shaped said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2601411#Comment_2601411
Lol people like you can't debate and it was a joke. Even if it wasn't, playing meg doesn't make you bad, otherwise some popular streamers like zubatlel would be horrible.
There is no debate with people like you, you lack logic and common sense just like everyone who generalise.
That is all from me in this thread, and when it comes to even aknowledging your existence anymore. Buh bye.
bro please it isn’t this deep. Most Mikaela players have ended up becoming the new terrible survivor stereotype we’ve come to accept this
-
@Bangarang said:
I’d rather have a lobby of Mikaela’s over a lobby of Kate’s. 🤢
Kate mains are the worst.
I don’t main Kate since her rework but nice try
-
@SlothGirly said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2601108#Comment_2601108
what makes her C-D tier?
Her having no chase power if good survivors don’t cleanse. An amazing survivor can just lead an M1 killer on for 5 gens or more. It’s the same reason pig is F tier. The only thing which makes plague C or D tier is if one person does cleanse the whole team can die but against a good meta team she’s also F tier.
-
@Rogue11 said:
I started calling them MegKaelas recently c:
Maybe it really is a ginger thing then.
-
No she’s still pretty much C-D tier
-
@Shaped said:
I don't see much difference regardless which survs my teammates play.
I am not falling for generalisations.
No need to take it so serious we’re just discussing personal experiences lol
-
@[Deleted User] said:
Maybe it's a ginger thing.
you make an insanely good point
-
@Lochnload_exe said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2597900#Comment_2597900
She does in fact still have good addons, and even more ambush ones as well that make her ambush better. If the only way you could win as her was the cheesy addons, then I'm sorry but that is a fault of you. She has a much better choice of addons now.
Oh yeah the ambush that’s easily countered by just running in the opposite direction when you see her crouch. Such a hard thing to dodge! She’s an M1 killer with no power until she downs someone and even then that power has an extremely high chance to be negated instantly if RNG is on survivors side.
-
@Lochnload_exe said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2597873#Comment_2597873
Wow they gave the killer overall better addons and healthier ones at that and removed something that was extremely unhealthy for the game, man BHVR sucks at balancing why can't pig kill survivors on first down anymore.
That’s the thing she has 1 good add on now. All her other add ons aren’t worth using nor are they good in any shape or form. Previously she had good add ons with some stronger ones which still rarely worked but helped her apply pressure she’ll never get otherwise but now she has literally nothing besides 1 decent add on that gives you an extra trap.
-
@Lochnload_exe said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2597198#Comment_2597198
Which were warranted, people really mistaken "good" for the definition of unhealthy. Oh no she lost her addon combo that made her unbearable to go against.
“Wow the worst killer in the game had an add on combo which only slightly worked if the map was good and she was even able to secure a down in the first place! Wouldn’t want her being C tier with two add ons!”
-
@Lochnload_exe said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/290348/when-will-bhvr-side-with-the-killers
I've been a killer main for about 4 years and this last update was one of the best ones. If you think they are laughing at killers then THAT is laughable. I now literally never have to worry about keys again. Trapper is EXPONENTIALLY better. Spirit actually feels fairer. Ghostface doesn't desperately need two cooldown addons anymore, actually, the whole cast now can see what their addons actually do. Pig also got better addons, and once again 3 man hatch escapes can't happen. Deathslinger nerf was more than earned. Not saying he didn't also need a buff, he most definitely needed a buff to go alongside the nerf, but the nerf was most definitely needed and it didn't destroy him, he can still win chases.
I’m just gonna say they straight up nerfed some of the pigs best add ons. She doesn’t have many good ones anymore.
-
I really don’t care. I’d rather it be a $10 upfront purchase (which cheap for 99% of games now a days) then $10 for 10 loot boxes which has a 1% chance of granting me a skin of the same rarity for a character I most likely don’t play. Or like some other games which charge upwards of $25 or higher for skins. DBD is pretty cheap sometimes lol
-
I’ll play him whenever I play dbd at least once. He’s definitely one of my favorite killers to use.
-
@alex511 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2594912#Comment_2594912
Tastes differ but it looks like a 20€ dress from a 90's catalogue seller.
It looks more 50’s American era to me. Considering her rares are both trash and she only has 3 (now) good purples I’d say it goes
fire moon festival Yun-Jin
brazil Yun-Jin
Set cosmetic Seoul Yun-Jin
-
@anarchy753 said:
The license is being revoked so that they can compete with their own Stranger Things games, why on Earth would they go "yes we'd like to end our contract, but let us just approve more skins to give you game even more power to pull in ST fans before it ends."
I mean tbf they added Johnathan 2 months before they removed the license and gave him a voice a month after they announced it was leaving
-
Yun-Jin’s skins is one of her best wdym? Probably her second best skin