Avatar

Vietfox

Vietfox

About

Username
Vietfox
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
—

Comments

  • I'm cool with that. Maybe a base of 5 min timer but when running bleeds faster, making it down to 2-3 minutes.
    Giving a base of 5 minutes would punish any killer who decides to bodyblock.
  • Wow. That's an amazing attitude. I love this Mathieu guy, even though he's French.

    That french thing killed me, good one @George_Soros xD
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    @RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    @RSB said:

    @powerbats said:
    
    @RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing.
    
    You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself.
    
    
    
    I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess.
    
    
    
    @powerbats means that being able to see the names could be a bug, not receiving 320 lols.
    

    I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works.

    Wait, monkey in my brin stopped working, what "ability to see names"?

    What @powerbats said: "You used to a ways back see who gave you what"

    Oh, I did not know that, understood it wrongly, I think. Quite sad we can't see it now.

    Yeah you also misread most of my posts as well ;)
  • @RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    @RSB said:

    @powerbats said:

    @RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing.

    You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself.

    I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess.

    @powerbats means that being able to see the names could be a bug, not receiving 320 lols.
    I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works.

    Wait, monkey in my brin stopped working, what "ability to see names"?

    What @powerbats said: "You used to a ways back see who gave you what"
  • @RSB said:

    @powerbats said:
    @RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing.

    You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself.

    I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess.

    @powerbats means that being able to see the names could be a bug, not receiving 320 lols.
    I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works.
  • @RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing.

    You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself.

    Thanks for the awesomes (and LOLs) xD
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    @RSB said:
    

    @Vietfox said: @Vietfox said: If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.

    PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.            Coming from you, that made me laught so hard.    Totally shameless huh ?        So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
    

    You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie. @giche You are toxic. Thank me later.

    Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD
    
    
    
    Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN
    

    One was mine

    And the other 12? XDD

    Vietfox stables xDDD

    Told you, idk.

    Everytime you @me I got a lol spam, this is damn bizzare ;-;

    I'll give you an awesome just for that xDD
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    @RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    @Vietfox said:
    
    If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
    

    PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity. Coming from you, that made me laught so hard. Totally shameless huh ? So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)

    You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.
    
    @giche
    
    
    
    You are toxic.
    
    Thank me later.
    

    Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD

    Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN

    One was mine

    And the other 12? XDD

    Vietfox stables xDDD

    Told you, idk.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    @RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    @Vietfox said:

    If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.

    PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.
    
    
    
    
    
    Coming from you, that made me laught so hard.
    
    Totally shameless huh ?
    
    
    
    So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
    

    You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.

    @giche

    You are toxic.

    Thank me later.

    Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD

    Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN

    One was mine
  • @RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    @Vietfox said:

    If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
    

    PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.

    Coming from you, that made me laught so hard.

    Totally shameless huh ?

    So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
    You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.
    @giche

    You are toxic.

    Thank me later.

    Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD

  • @Vietfox said:

    If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
    PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.

    Coming from you, that made me laught so hard.

    Totally shameless huh ?

    So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
    You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.
    @giche

  • Giche said:

    @Orion

    I mean...

    They know how toxic their community is.

    They see this said community (that they CREATED, never forget that) acting as it usually do (toxicity fest)

    But no, they'd rather don't say anything at first, to see how far it can go.

    And when everything is already "burning" they also rather post their usual trollish answer, like "Go play something else" back then.

    Spilling gas on the fire.

    Knowing this game's history, they still act all smug with everyone of us, even the most reasonable one.

    Like some sort of disgusting scientist : "Let see what happen if say this LUL".

    They already make money on toxicity (that they created, again) and even dare to act smug and mock their customers, after all of this.

    F.U.C.K them, nothing else to add.

    I don't even care nor was hyped about the next Chapter.

    I just can't stand toxic peoples, and these devs especially.

    You don't know their reasons to not tell the release date, could need some more testing for instance. We don't want another patch with new bugs like tinkerer2. Stop assuming you are being trolled.
    If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
    PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.
    Edit: @giche (since the notification system doesn't work sometimes)
  • @Doc_W__HOLLIDAY said:
    DS and SB deserve nerfs, yes. But SC and Adrenaline are fine imo. Adrenaline is very situational.

    I can't resist, you've corrupted me.

    While i was reading the post i was thinking "i hope the git gud doc meme is right below".
    THANK YOU <3
  • @RSB @Vietfox
    Wait, you guys are agreeing on something? Quick! Argue about something before the fabric of the universe falls apart!

    Lol so true xD
  • We need a soviet now
  • Plippy said:

    I'm not gay but he can sure turn a guy's head.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lYtAmrQUt_s
  • Marry me
    I do!!! :D<3

    Marry me
    I do!!! :D<3
    Time to book a room <3
    XD
  • Vietfox said:

    The lead singer in that video stole Ace's shirt =p

    You can't simply call him "lead singer" dude... He's Steve Perry from Journey. Also listen "separate ways"
    Funny enough I heard a kid ask who "Michael Jackson" was... My heart broke in a million pieces... All his other issues aside he was an amazing artist and performer... 
    What issues? They demonstrated he wasn't a pedo because that kid confessed it was all a lie, iirc.
    If you are talking about father issues or skin stuff then yeah.
    Anyway, this is way far from the original discussion xD
  • Will you please now consider adding colorblind options to the game? Thanks.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    RSB said:
    

    @Vietfox said: RSB said:

    @vietfox really, pal, you could stop with that spamming lols on my every comment and endorsing your own with awesomes xd        You really think it's me? XD
    

    I ******* swear it, it's not me! Yeah... Sure. It is really childish, even for this forum, but whatever

    Added you on steam, i'll send you the screenshots of me talking to a friend. Was telling her you were being spammed by lols again
    
    
    
    Sorry, I'm not on a computer, so I can't accept the invite, but I will do it tomortow, after work (~18h from now).
    
    Besides, what does your friend have to do with it?
    

    Because it was damn weird that lol spam and since she casually visits the forums that's why i was telling her that

    And if you REALLY did nothing with those lols, then there is only one, logical answer - ochido fanboys grouped, and chosen us to be their targets.

    I'm their enemy, you are their hero. Damn ochido fanboys...

    I mean it, not gonna waste my time on creating more accounts for this stuff.
    PS: i did think about new names in case i got a permaban though.

    So if you have nothing to do with it, why someone is spamming awesomes on you, and lols on me?

    I know as much as you do.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    RSB said:
    

    @vietfox really, pal, you could stop with that spamming lols on my every comment and endorsing your own with awesomes xd You really think it's me? XD

    I ******* swear it, it's not me!
    
    
    
    Yeah... Sure. It is really childish, even for this forum, but whatever
    

    Added you on steam, i'll send you the screenshots of me talking to a friend. Was telling her you were being spammed by lols again

    Sorry, I'm not on a computer, so I can't accept the invite, but I will do it tomortow, after work (~18h from now).

    Besides, what does your friend have to do with it?

    Because it was damn weird that lol spam and since she casually visits the forums that's why i was telling her that

    And if you REALLY did nothing with those lols, then there is only one, logical answer - ochido fanboys grouped, and chosen us to be their targets.

    I'm their enemy, you are their hero. Damn ochido fanboys...

    I mean it, not gonna waste my time on creating more accounts for this stuff.
    PS: i did think about new names in case i got a permaban though.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    RSB said:

    @vietfox really, pal, you could stop with that spamming lols on my every comment and endorsing your own with awesomes xd
    
    
    
    You really think it's me? XD
    

    I ******* swear it, it's not me!

    Yeah... Sure. It is really childish, even for this forum, but whatever

    Added you on steam, i'll send you the screenshots of me talking to a friend. Was telling her you were being spammed by lols again

    Sorry, I'm not on a computer, so I can't accept the invite, but I will do it tomortow, after work (~18h from now).

    Besides, what does your friend have to do with it?

    Because it was damn weird that lol spam and since she casually visits the forums that's why i was telling her that
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @vietfox really, pal, you could stop with that spamming lols on my every comment and endorsing your own with awesomes xd

    You really think it's me? XD
    I ******* swear it, it's not me!

    Yeah... Sure. It is really childish, even for this forum, but whatever

    Added you on steam, i'll send you the screenshots of me talking to a friend. Was telling her you were being spammed by lols again
  • RSB said:

    @vietfox really, pal, you could stop with that spamming lols on my every comment and endorsing your own with awesomes xd

    You really think it's me? XD
    I ******* swear it, it's not me!
  • You are gonna have a tough life kid if these are the things which make you upset.
  • It's KYF
    Edit: dlc as well? That's weird then
  • The lead singer in that video stole Ace's shirt =p

    You can't simply call him "lead singer" dude... He's Steve Perry from Journey. Also listen "separate ways"
  • Try to edit the tittle and add *DELETE* or something like that
  • @ a mod and tell them to close it
  • Being patience is not common here. Which is weird considering the patience it takes to camp :)
    Good one xD
  • I was drinking already! XD

  • RSB said:

    What part of "Soon™" don't you understand? Be patient!

    Can't believe i agree with you.
  • I find it funny that so many people are getting worked up about the DLC releasing today when it hasn't even been confirmed. Seeing people complain that something they assumed ending up being wrong is great.

    Indeed xD
  • @not_Queen said:
    Soon™

    Lol, just like Gina from ESO forums. Became a meme

  • fcc2014 said:
    Vietfox said:
    Giche said:

    @Vietfox
    @fcc2014

    Yeah we know, we know...

    Come on, go and look for a single comment of mine complaining about noed. If you do, i'll change my name to Rektfox xD
    Also, i might have said that camping for the only reason to secure the kill and stuff are cheap tactics but that's it. Never asked for them to be punished or reportable.
    Anyway, glad you thought about me, that gif made me laugh xD
    Edit: i even said noed was fine. And, as far as i know, never called any perk a "crutch".
    I play both sides at rank one. The complaints at this point are just beyond ridiculous.
    You quoted me instead of @Giche xD
  • RSB said:

    God, love how bunch of survbois from the @Vietfox stable are running around every of my posts on this forum, and spamming "LOL" on them XD Are you really that sad? I've earned ~100 lols in 10 minutes thanks to it XD Viet, please, tell them to boost something more, I don't know, Awesomes or Vote Ups xD

    "Vietfox stable" i'm dying xDDD
    Yeah, noticed it too. I swear i had nothing to do with that.
  • Master said:

    @Vietfox said:
    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:

    @RSB said:

    @ThatOneGuy said:
    
    Sorry but killers should NOT be able to grab someone who has already started to “escape” through the hatch. It is total B.S. and unfair that something like that is even allowed to happen especially when the killer is camping the hatch. It is the last players last resort to escaping and you mean to tell me that the killer can stop them from even doing that! Sorry but that’s just another reason why this game sucks hard core and is in heavier favor of the killer than it is the survivor. Who ever thought that was a good idea can be fired plz and thank you. Don’t care what anyone else has to say I’m venting so leave me alone. 
    
    
    
    Want to know what is unfair? When killer ######### earns his 4k, but the game decided to give a free win to the survivor, who did nothing but hiding all the game, or doing mere 2 gens.
    
    
    
    Thats shows how often you play as a survivor. If you played more as a survivor you'll know that there are many cases where the last survivor managed to do well, not hiding all the time or just doing 2 gens.
    

    You want 4K? Slug the 3rd one and go kill the 4th one.

    Your complaints are as valid as OP's ones

    Usually in teamgames, the whole team loses when it does bad.

    Imgine for example in killing floor if the last guy alive could press a nuke button and magically win the game, that would be weird AF, do you agree? :wink:

    Never played that game so i can't really tell, but doesnt sound as the same situation because i understand that you meant there are 2 teams and last one from the losing team get to kill the other team by pressing that nuke button.
    In dbd you get 3k even if the last survivor escapes, you don't die and 3K it's still a win for the killer.

    Killing floor is a perfect example because a team of survivors (with guns) are trying to survive several zombie waves. When all survivors die within one wave, the game is lost.

    The killer can only blackpip even with 4 kills, just fyi, that much about the "win" for the killer :wink:

    I never understood why the last survivor is entitled an escape if the survivors screwed up, but the killer only is supposed to get a 3k if he did very well

    By waves you mean survival mode? In those modes you die no matter what you do xD
    Well, i said 3K as in general. A survivor can blackpip as well even if manages to escape. Both need to be really bad or have bad luck.
    You can slug. If the 3rd survivor dcs so the other one can escape, well... ######### happens. Same way when i get hard camped for no other reason than secure the kill.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    @RSB said:

    Tense match is a thing as long as the killer is able to kill. Maybe not when standing at the gate but this is a hatch thread after all.

    Nice dodge.
    
    The dc trick is rarely done, they need to be swfs, be in comms and find the hatch first so they can secure the escape.
    
    
    
    Rarely? These days, when 70% of survivors are in SWF, in 100% of my matches the third surv DCs, when I slug him.
    
    As i said once, you'd be surprised how often i play as a killer. Mainly to not get rusty on "how the killer things", learn from other survivors and stuff, so yeah, i can see killer's side by myself.
    
    
    
    Playing killer on low ranks is not a good source of informations about current state of balance.
    
    The difference between you and me is that you are way more emotional and get upset for things that i don't.
    
    
    
    Of course, honey ;&gt; Nown I'm literally hitting the keyboard with my head, while you are meditating on your bed, dressed in Shaolin monk's robes. Sure, that's how it is. Is it how you imagine me and you? I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm not angry, just tired of biased people.
    
    
    
    That percentage has been proven to be false by several people from this forum with dbd data, you just say it to make is sound more dramatic.
    
    As already estated, it's too easy to rank up. So even being a survivor main you can reach red ranks as a killer, 1 month is enough time...
    

    Well, it was funny to see you and @Mycroft yesterday throwing ######### at survivor players and calling them "stupid" and not a single survivor main fell for that bait. That also shows who is the emotional and childish one.

    Dodging and dodging. Won't answer to you, unless you answer on my questions. And since you are dodging hard, guess I don't need to answer to you at all.

    Lol, i actually answered to what you said xDD. I guess you say that every time you run out of ideas. Okay then.

    Answered?

    So why there is no "tense match", when killer gets his ass kicked? Hm? Why there should be a "tense match" ONLY when killer wins?

    ""just brick di ballet" - yeah, sure. How about I slug the third surv, and he DCs, to give his teammate a free win?
    Why do you, survivor mains, DEMAND a free wins and second chances in this game? While us, 50/50 players and killer mains need to tryhard, because survs and the game throws everything at us? Map design, pallet design, perks design and this hatch - there is no such things for the killers, as second chances etc. Even their greatest perks are destroyable, while you can use SC, BT and SB many times, and no one will take it from you.

    When I play Survivor with my SWF buddies we are totally goofing around and still winning. We can play on a map like in a sandbox, play with the killer, and still 3-4 of us escape. Got hit? "Yeah, I've got SC, will massage my ass and everything will be okay". I even refuse to use DS, because the couple of times I did, I felt like a dirty [BAD WORD]. When you play as a killer sometimes, you know how frustrating it is, and how unfair. Something you clearly do not understand. When biased survs dare to try killer for the first time in their lives, and go with him on mid-high ranks, they drastically change their opinon on how "killer is ez". Wonder why there are no killers who say "You know what? I've tried that surv, it is really hard, harder than playing killer".

    If you do not see this, then I do not see an incentive to discuss with you either."

    Where are your "answers" to this post? If you want to lie, at least try to look serious.

    Thought u were leaving :)
    Ok, read what you just posted and read what i answered. If you read properly you'll see how your posts and mine are related to the same topics. Just read mate!
    PS: i foresee another "dodge and dodge reply of yours" xD but i'm not gonna bother on writing the same stuff again because:
    1 - i'm using the cellphone
    2 - it's already written
  • @RSB said:

    Tense match is a thing as long as the killer is able to kill. Maybe not when standing at the gate but this is a hatch thread after all.

    Nice dodge.

    The dc trick is rarely done, they need to be swfs, be in comms and find the hatch first so they can secure the escape.

    Rarely? These days, when 70% of survivors are in SWF, in 100% of my matches the third surv DCs, when I slug him.

    As i said once, you'd be surprised how often i play as a killer. Mainly to not get rusty on "how the killer things", learn from other survivors and stuff, so yeah, i can see killer's side by myself.

    Playing killer on low ranks is not a good source of informations about current state of balance.

    The difference between you and me is that you are way more emotional and get upset for things that i don't.

    Of course, honey ;> Nown I'm literally hitting the keyboard with my head, while you are meditating on your bed, dressed in Shaolin monk's robes. Sure, that's how it is. Is it how you imagine me and you? I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm not angry, just tired of biased people.

    That percentage has been proven to be false by several people from this forum with dbd data, you just say it to make is sound more dramatic.

    As already estated, it's too easy to rank up. So even being a survivor main you can reach red ranks as a killer, 1 month is enough time...

    Well, it was funny to see you and @Mycroft yesterday throwing ######### at survivor players and calling them "stupid" and not a single survivor main fell for that bait. That also shows who is the emotional and childish one.

    Dodging and dodging. Won't answer to you, unless you answer on my questions. And since you are dodging hard, guess I don't need to answer to you at all.

    Lol, i actually answered to what you said xDD. I guess you say that every time you run out of ideas. Okay then.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    RSB said:
    

    @Vietfox said: Master said:

    @Vietfox said:    @RSB ;said:
    

    @ThatOneGuy said: Sorry but killers should NOT be able to grab someone who has already started to “escape” through the hatch. It is total B.S. and unfair that something like that is even allowed to happen especially when the killer is camping the hatch. It is the last players last resort to escaping and you mean to tell me that the killer can stop them from even doing that! Sorry but that’s just another reason why this game sucks hard core and is in heavier favor of the killer than it is the survivor. Who ever thought that was a good idea can be fired plz and thank you. Don’t care what anyone else has to say I’m venting so leave me alone.  Want to know what is unfair? When killer ######### earns his 4k, but the game decided to give a free win to the survivor, who did nothing but hiding all the game, or doing mere 2 gens. Thats shows how often you play as a survivor. If you played more as a survivor you'll know that there are many cases where the last survivor managed to do well, not hiding all the time or just doing 2 gens.

    You want 4K? Slug the 3rd one and go kill the 4th one.    Your complaints are as valid as OP's ones        Usually in teamgames, the whole team loses when it does bad.    Imgine for example in killing floor if the last guy alive could press a nuke button and magically win the game, that would be weird AF, do you agree? :wink:        Never played that game so i can't really tell, but doesnt sound as the same situation because i understand that you meant there are 2 teams and last one from the losing team get to kill the other team by pressing that nuke button.
    

    In dbd you get 3k even if the last survivor escapes, you don't die and 3K it's still a win for the killer. So, by your logic, killers should have one free kill at the end. What? 3 escaped, what's the problem? Unfair? Oh, how sweet.

    That's why you got end-game perks like noed or rancor. Especially this last one, which gives you a free kill for not doing your job.
    
    
    
    Kek, you've destroyed yourself.
    
    You have perks to do gens, so why are you relying on hatch? Said perks gives you advantage for not doing your job. Use this - https://deadbydaylight.gamepedia.com/Left_Behind easy fix. That's why you got end-game perks, as you said.
    
    Oh, what? Only killers should use perks to help them on endgame, while survivors should be handed a free escapes, so they can keep their DS, BT, SC and SB? Sad.
    
    
    
    Oh, you mean that? I've explained it several times and yet you seem to ignore it.
    

    Hatch is meant to provide a tense match till the very end. If there are 2 or 3 gens left and you are alone then you'll end up dead, even if you have LB.

    I'll say it again, you can counter the hatch by slugging second last survivor, problem solved.

    So why there is no "tense match", when killer gets his ass kicked? Hm? Why there should be a "tense match" ONLY when killer wins?

    "just brick di ballet" - yeah, sure. How about I slug the third surv, and he DCs, to give his teammate a free win?

    Why do you, survivor mains, DEMAND a free wins and second chances in this game? While us, 50/50 players and killer mains need to tryhard, because survs and the game throws everything at us? Map design, pallet design, perks design and this hatch - there is no such things for the killers, as second chances etc. Even their greatest perks are destroyable, while you can use SC, BT and SB many times, and no one will take it from you.

    When I play Survivor with my SWF buddies we are totally goofing around and still winning. We can play on a map like in a sandbox, play with the killer, and still 3-4 of us escape. Got hit? "Yeah, I've got SC, will massage my ass and everything will be okay". I even refuse to use DS, because the couple of times I did, I felt like a dirty [BAD WORD]. When you play as a killer sometimes, you know how frustrating it is, and how unfair. Something you clearly do not understand. When biased survs dare to try killer for the first time in their lives, and go with him on mid-high ranks, they drastically change their opinon on how "killer is ez". Wonder why there are no killers who say "You know what? I've tried that surv, it is really hard, harder than playing killer".

    If you do not see this, then I do not see an incentive to discuss with you either.

    Tense match is a thing as long as the killer is able to kill. Maybe not when standing at the gate but this is a hatch thread after all.

    Nice dodge.

    The dc trick is rarely done, they need to be swfs, be in comms and find the hatch first so they can secure the escape.

    Rarely? These days, when 70% of survivors are in SWF, in 100% of my matches the third surv DCs, when I slug him.

    As i said once, you'd be surprised how often i play as a killer. Mainly to not get rusty on "how the killer things", learn from other survivors and stuff, so yeah, i can see killer's side by myself.

    Playing killer on low ranks is not a good source of informations about current state of balance.

    The difference between you and me is that you are way more emotional and get upset for things that i don't.

    Of course, honey ;> Nown I'm literally hitting the keyboard with my head, while you are meditating on your bed, dressed in Shaolin monk's robes. Sure, that's how it is. Is it how you imagine me and you? I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm not angry, just tired of biased people.

    That percentage has been proven to be false by several people from this forum with dbd data, you just say it to make is sound more dramatic.

    As already estated, it's too easy to rank up. So even being a survivor main you can reach red ranks as a killer, 1 month is enough time...

    Well, it was funny to see you and @Mycroft yesterday throwing ######### at survivor players and calling them "stupid" and not a single survivor main fell for that bait. That also shows who is the emotional and childish one.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    Master said:
    

    @Vietfox said: @RSB ;said:

    @ThatOneGuy said:    Sorry but killers should NOT be able to grab someone who has already started to “escape” through the hatch. It is total B.S. and unfair that something like that is even allowed to happen especially when the killer is camping the hatch. It is the last players last resort to escaping and you mean to tell me that the killer can stop them from even doing that! Sorry but that’s just another reason why this game sucks hard core and is in heavier favor of the killer than it is the survivor. Who ever thought that was a good idea can be fired plz and thank you. Don’t care what anyone else has to say I’m venting so leave me alone.         Want to know what is unfair? When killer ######### earns his 4k, but the game decided to give a free win to the survivor, who did nothing but hiding all the game, or doing mere 2 gens.        Thats shows how often you play as a survivor. If you played more as a survivor you'll know that there are many cases where the last survivor managed to do well, not hiding all the time or just doing 2 gens.
    

    You want 4K? Slug the 3rd one and go kill the 4th one. Your complaints are as valid as OP's ones Usually in teamgames, the whole team loses when it does bad. Imgine for example in killing floor if the last guy alive could press a nuke button and magically win the game, that would be weird AF, do you agree? :wink: Never played that game so i can't really tell, but doesnt sound as the same situation because i understand that you meant there are 2 teams and last one from the losing team get to kill the other team by pressing that nuke button.

    In dbd you get 3k even if the last survivor escapes, you don't die and 3K it's still a win for the killer.
    
    
    
    So, by your logic, killers should have one free kill at the end. What? 3 escaped, what's the problem? Unfair? Oh, how sweet.
    

    That's why you got end-game perks like noed or rancor. Especially this last one, which gives you a free kill for not doing your job.

    Kek, you've destroyed yourself.

    You have perks to do gens, so why are you relying on hatch? Said perks gives you advantage for not doing your job. Use this - https://deadbydaylight.gamepedia.com/Left_Behind easy fix. That's why you got end-game perks, as you said.

    Oh, what? Only killers should use perks to help them on endgame, while survivors should be handed a free escapes, so they can keep their DS, BT, SC and SB? Sad.

    Oh, you mean that? I've explained it several times and yet you seem to ignore it.
    Hatch is meant to provide a tense match till the very end. If there are 2 or 3 gens left and you are alone then you'll end up dead, even if you have LB.
    I'll say it again, you can counter the hatch by slugging second last survivor, problem solved.

    So why there is no "tense match", when killer gets his ass kicked? Hm? Why there should be a "tense match" ONLY when killer wins?

    "just brick di ballet" - yeah, sure. How about I slug the third surv, and he DCs, to give his teammate a free win?
    Why do you, survivor mains, DEMAND a free wins and second chances in this game? While us, 50/50 players and killer mains need to tryhard, because survs and the game throws everything at us? Map design, pallet design, perks design and this hatch - there is no such things for the killers, as second chances etc. Even their greatest perks are destroyable, while you can use SC, BT and SB many times, and no one will take it from you.

    When I play Survivor with my SWF buddies we are totally goofing around and still winning. We can play on a map like in a sandbox, play with the killer, and still 3-4 of us escape. Got hit? "Yeah, I've got SC, will massage my ass and everything will be okay". I even refuse to use DS, because the couple of times I did, I felt like a dirty [BAD WORD]. When you play as a killer sometimes, you know how frustrating it is, and how unfair. Something you clearly do not understand. When biased survs dare to try killer for the first time in their lives, and go with him on mid-high ranks, they drastically change their opinon on how "killer is ez". Wonder why there are no killers who say "You know what? I've tried that surv, it is really hard, harder than playing killer".

    If you do not see this, then I do not see an incentive to discuss with you either.

    Tense match is a thing as long as the killer is able to kill. Maybe not when standing at the gate but this is a hatch thread after all.
    The dc trick is rarely done, they need to be swfs, be in comms and find the hatch first so they can secure the escape.
    As i said once, you'd be surprised how often i play as a killer. Mainly to not get rusty on "how the killer thinks", learn from other survivors and stuff, so yeah, i can see killer's side by myself.
    The difference between you and me is that you are way more emotional and get upset for things that i don't.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:

    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    @RSB said:
    

    @ThatOneGuy said: Sorry but killers should NOT be able to grab someone who has already started to “escape” through the hatch. It is total B.S. and unfair that something like that is even allowed to happen especially when the killer is camping the hatch. It is the last players last resort to escaping and you mean to tell me that the killer can stop them from even doing that! Sorry but that’s just another reason why this game sucks hard core and is in heavier favor of the killer than it is the survivor. Who ever thought that was a good idea can be fired plz and thank you. Don’t care what anyone else has to say I’m venting so leave me alone.  Want to know what is unfair? When killer ######### earns his 4k, but the game decided to give a free win to the survivor, who did nothing but hiding all the game, or doing mere 2 gens. Thats shows how often you play as a survivor. If you played more as a survivor you'll know that there are many cases where the last survivor managed to do well, not hiding all the time or just doing 2 gens.

    You want 4K? Slug the 3rd one and go kill the 4th one.
    
    Your complaints are as valid as OP's ones
    
    
    
    Usually in teamgames, the whole team loses when it does bad.
    
    Imgine for example in killing floor if the last guy alive could press a nuke button and magically win the game, that would be weird AF, do you agree? :wink:
    
    
    
    Never played that game so i can't really tell, but doesnt sound as the same situation because i understand that you meant there are 2 teams and last one from the losing team get to kill the other team by pressing that nuke button.
    

    In dbd you get 3k even if the last survivor escapes, you don't die and 3K it's still a win for the killer.

    So, by your logic, killers should have one free kill at the end. What? 3 escaped, what's the problem? Unfair? Oh, how sweet.

    That's why you got end-game perks like noed or rancor. Especially this last one, which gives you a free kill for not doing your job.

    Kek, you've destroyed yourself.

    You have perks to do gens, so why are you relying on hatch? Said perks gives you advantage for not doing your job. Use this - https://deadbydaylight.gamepedia.com/Left_Behind easy fix. That's why you got end-game perks, as you said.

    Oh, what? Only killers should use perks to help them on endgame, while survivors should be handed a free escapes, so they can keep their DS, BT, SC and SB? Sad.

    Oh, you mean that? I've explained it several times and yet you seem to ignore it.
    Hatch is meant to provide a tense match till the very end. If there are 2 or 3 gens left and you are alone then you'll end up dead, even if you have LB.
    I'll say it again, you can counter the hatch by slugging second last survivor, problem solved.
  • RSB said:

    @Vietfox said:
    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:

    @RSB said:

    @ThatOneGuy said:
    
    Sorry but killers should NOT be able to grab someone who has already started to “escape” through the hatch. It is total B.S. and unfair that something like that is even allowed to happen especially when the killer is camping the hatch. It is the last players last resort to escaping and you mean to tell me that the killer can stop them from even doing that! Sorry but that’s just another reason why this game sucks hard core and is in heavier favor of the killer than it is the survivor. Who ever thought that was a good idea can be fired plz and thank you. Don’t care what anyone else has to say I’m venting so leave me alone. 
    
    
    
    Want to know what is unfair? When killer ######### earns his 4k, but the game decided to give a free win to the survivor, who did nothing but hiding all the game, or doing mere 2 gens.
    
    
    
    Thats shows how often you play as a survivor. If you played more as a survivor you'll know that there are many cases where the last survivor managed to do well, not hiding all the time or just doing 2 gens.
    

    You want 4K? Slug the 3rd one and go kill the 4th one.

    Your complaints are as valid as OP's ones

    Usually in teamgames, the whole team loses when it does bad.

    Imgine for example in killing floor if the last guy alive could press a nuke button and magically win the game, that would be weird AF, do you agree? :wink:

    Never played that game so i can't really tell, but doesnt sound as the same situation because i understand that you meant there are 2 teams and last one from the losing team get to kill the other team by pressing that nuke button.
    In dbd you get 3k even if the last survivor escapes, you don't die and 3K it's still a win for the killer.

    So, by your logic, killers should have one free kill at the end. What? 3 escaped, what's the problem? Unfair? Oh, how sweet.

    That's why you got end-game perks like noed or rancor. Especially this last one, which gives you a free kill for not doing your job.
  • Master said:

    @Vietfox said:
    @RSB said:

    @ThatOneGuy said:

    Sorry but killers should NOT be able to grab someone who has already started to “escape” through the hatch. It is total B.S. and unfair that something like that is even allowed to happen especially when the killer is camping the hatch. It is the last players last resort to escaping and you mean to tell me that the killer can stop them from even doing that! Sorry but that’s just another reason why this game sucks hard core and is in heavier favor of the killer than it is the survivor. Who ever thought that was a good idea can be fired plz and thank you. Don’t care what anyone else has to say I’m venting so leave me alone. 

    Want to know what is unfair? When killer ######### earns his 4k, but the game decided to give a free win to the survivor, who did nothing but hiding all the game, or doing mere 2 gens.

    Thats shows how often you play as a survivor. If you played more as a survivor you'll know that there are many cases where the last survivor managed to do well, not hiding all the time or just doing 2 gens.
    You want 4K? Slug the 3rd one and go kill the 4th one.
    Your complaints are as valid as OP's ones

    Usually in teamgames, the whole team loses when it does bad.
    Imgine for example in killing floor if the last guy alive could press a nuke button and magically win the game, that would be weird AF, do you agree? :wink:

    Never played that game so i can't really tell, but doesnt sound as the same situation because i understand that you meant there are 2 teams and last one from the losing team get to kill the other team by pressing that nuke button.
    In dbd you get 3k even if the last survivor escapes, you don't die and 3K it's still a win for the killer.
  • @RSBsaid:

    @ThatOneGuy said:
    Sorry but killers should NOT be able to grab someone who has already started to “escape” through the hatch. It is total B.S. and unfair that something like that is even allowed to happen especially when the killer is camping the hatch. It is the last players last resort to escaping and you mean to tell me that the killer can stop them from even doing that! Sorry but that’s just another reason why this game sucks hard core and is in heavier favor of the killer than it is the survivor. Who ever thought that was a good idea can be fired plz and thank you. Don’t care what anyone else has to say I’m venting so leave me alone. 

    Want to know what is unfair? When killer ######### earns his 4k, but the game decided to give a free win to the survivor, who did nothing but hiding all the game, or doing mere 2 gens.

    Thats shows how often you play as a survivor. If you played more as a survivor you'll know that there are many cases where the last survivor managed to do well, not hiding all the time or just doing 2 gens.
    You want 4K? Slug the 3rd one and go kill the 4th one.
    Your complaints are as valid as OP's ones
  • I see you are new here.
    I'm a survivor main, and it's fair that killers can grab you when jumping, just don't jump when they get close enough to grab you. If they do, just play with them, let them hit you first, etc...
  • Giche said:

    @Vietfox
    @fcc2014

    Yeah we know, we know...

    Come on, go and look for a single comment of mine complaining about noed. If you do, i'll change my name to Rektfox xD
    Also, i might have said that camping for the only reason to secure the kill and stuff are cheap tactics but that's it. Never asked for them to be punished or reportable.
    Anyway, glad you thought about me, that gif made me laugh xD
    Edit: i even said noed was fine. And, as far as i know, never called any perk a "crutch".
  • Je suis désolé :( 
    C'est quoi ce bordel (my favourite french sentence)
1 … 54 55 56 57 58 … 72