RabidWabbitz
RabidWabbitz
About
- Username
- RabidWabbitz
- Joined
- Visits
- 209
- Last Active
Comments
-
This is crazy that they are putting Legion buff above the Freddy one. Lame!
-
Lets also talk about the bull that is going on where they decide to put Legion above Freddy that has been promised a change since he basically came out. This is lame!
-
Also I am not going to lie. I thought for sure they would be shutting down anything that referred to the leak at all as I didn't see much about it on here. It is FREAKING ASH PEOPLE! Start talking about this!
-
I am hoping for the killer to be the version of Bad Ash that dances back and fourth saying "Little Goody Two Shoes" lol
-
The reason I think it will be taken down is because I haven't seen much buzz about this leak and that is weird to me.
-
@pootis_Bear or should I say out of the 4 that were road mapped.
-
I personally think this is a planned leak to get everyone pumped since they didn't release a Licensed in 2018 like they should have.
-
I agree with quite a few that are saying that the rework is not going to actually take place. There has been no progress shown aside that few times they said they would. how about giving us a little sneak peak on it! I am a Freddy main but with that being said I only use him at low ranks as I get destroyed at higher ranks. he is a joke at higher ranks. I do enjoy Freddy and how he plays the biggest reason why I want the rework is that this is not Freddy it is some dime store version of him that is based off of the Sandman which once again is not Freddy. Freddy is the King of dream Hallucinations and should be delivered as such. he should have fake surviviors that run around the map hurt and you heal them, you should have totems that are not totems, or gens for that matter, he should be able to walk through walls. He needs to be more scary and also be at the top of the tier instead of the bottom.
-
I have actually talked about this in other comments in this post that you can refer back to.
-
you're a funny one. lol
-
I realize that I am obviously over exaggerating this situation. I am familiar with servers and the easiest part of these situations is the location and keeping them cool, you basically need a room that is the size of the amount of servers you get and then install a cooling unit. A lot of the time they are in rooms the size of small bathrooms. I am just saying if they really wanted dedicated servers it could be done fast. but priorities are different for all.
-
I am really bummed also, finally someone that feels the way I do! I know there are more that aren't talking but there really should be 1 licensed per year no matter what. Shame is right! they have made so much money off of this game I am sure they can use some of it towards a old used up licensed killer, or a new used up killer so to speak like you stated of movies that sucked.
-
@JoannaVO said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/361968#Comment_361968
Leatherface? Who is he similar too?
If you mean Hillbilly, then no, both might have a chainsaw but is used completely different.
That could be the similarities to the clown and pennywise also. you don't know so lets wait and see what they do. I just hope they continue the course of Licensed killers is all I am saying and they should have done one this last time.
-
LOL I must be boring huh? You act like I am the only one that wants Licensed killers when in fact there are way more than you think. Also you act like we knew exactly what the powers of a licensed killer would be. you can't tell me that you knew how it would react or the addons or anything really. lol you are funny my friend. and once again I am not attacking anyone that likes original killers. I like them also I just am requesting that they offer licensed with originals and equal distribution so to speak.
-
it is so funny, I have come across so many people that hate on this game day in day out and yet they play it all of the time. so I am glade that I take joy in something that I play and can find fun in all of the killers. I don't think I would play it if I hated half of what came out but luckily I am not that jaded.
-
@ViolentSh4de and you are entitled to that opinion, I however strongly disagree. There have been many fun times I have had with friends when a Meyers pops around a corner and scares the ######### out of me or a friend and we laugh.
-
I know that a lot of people are saying that people where upset that there wasn't enough original content when they released the pig and I would agree with that. All I am saying with this whole post is that I think the Devs should have put in at least one Licensed out of the 4 released this year. I am not down grading the original content nor saying that there should only be Licensed killers.
And for those saying that the Licensed killers cost a lot and that is why they can't get them, I know that is not the case for all of the licensed killers in movie slasher history. There are tons of them that they could draw from and I would venture to say there are many of them that would jump at the chance to have their licensed killer in this game even!
-
well I guess you are completely missing the meaning of what I am saying, and that is fine. have a good day!
-
What is funny about words is that when presented alone they mean one thing but when put together they convey another meaning. Weird how the Word Contract by itself is one meaning but when I put the word unspoken in front of it, it then conveys the meaning that I want expressed. Oh how the English language is amazing and useful. LMAO!
-
@Divinitye9 I actually feel personally that they could do both if properly managed. As far as the dedicated servers, you buy them, put the game on them, and make them live so not sure why that is taking so long.
-
For some reason my quote isn't working so I will just reply.
@DeadGavin I am not downplaying the fact that the original killers are amazing as I love them also. I am just saying that I feel they owe their customer base at least one licensed killer per year. Just my opinion once again and I realize that it is not shared by all. but I also guarantee that there are many that feel the same way I do.
-
It is funny that so many people keep saying things like the money that they (The DEVS) pay for Licensed killers is a lot and that is why they don't do it. But here is something that maybe you overlooked. That money that you pay in order to play that character ends up paying for it. "What you must be joking there Rabid? Nope I am not, Crazy how that works isn't it?" lol And as far as unspoken Contract, it is exactly that UNSPOKEN. When you set a precedent with bringing Licensed killers into your game then you create a once again "UNSPOKEN" contract with your customers. Funny how that works. lol
@Peasant Also you say that I might want to quite down. lol This is called a Forum Son. This place is exactly designed for me to talk up!
-
Well aren't you civilized in your words. lol I am just presenting my opinions and I am sorry that you feel differently. but to each their own.
-
Please everyone don't think that I am talking down on the original killers because I like them as well and the game for sure needs them also, I just think the devs need to uphold the unspoken contract that they have with their fans by producing Licensed killers also.
-
@PigMainBigBrain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/50029/shame-on-devs-for-no-licensed-killer
Not gonna lie....the fact that this game has some of the most iconic horror killers to ever touch a big screen is nothing short of amazing and separates it from all other games that try to copy the style. And to be honest with the success this game has, the the titanic fan base that it has, they should monopolize on that concept by adding more. There's literally nothing else like it on the market. And while their unique killers are great.....theres just something extra special about knowing Amanda, Michael myers, Leatherface, and Freddy Kruger could exist in 1 game is nothing short of remarkable. Just imagine if there were more! Ghostface, The Nun, Chucky, Pinhead, The Grudge, IT the clown, Pumpkinhead, Creature from the black lagoon, I mean the list could go on for hours but theres a plethora of iconic movie monsters to pick from. ######### if I was some horror movie director it'd be a huge honor to have my character in this game, that means that your movie stands concrete for generations to come as one of the most iconic horror villains of all time! Imagine that....Michael Myers right now has more clout than his rival Jason Vorhees. Amanda Young and the legacy of Jigsaw can never be forgotten. Leatherface is no longer just some old slasher horror that you can just forget about, he is an Icon now, cemented in this player base and transcending generational movie barriers! And no matter how critical reviewers were of the last Freddy movie, this game still stands as one of the best ways to get behind the wheel of freddy and do the carnage from his view. (Although, I am hoping the skill rework expands upon his concepts in the dream world even more, him shapeshifting or suddenly having arms as long as a bus in the dream world are really iconic to his powers)
I agree with all that is here!
-
@George_Soros said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/347970#Comment_347970
This :)
Also: "Responsibilities"? That's some next level entitlement. And "free Pinhead"...
No offense @RabidWabbitz , but nothing is free in this life.
Free as in he is locked up so free him. lol
-
The New killer is cool and her perks are eh. But I do like the new delivery. at least now we all get the reveal together and not just PTBers. at least the figure out good ways for that. But I HATE HATE the fact that they once again copped out and didn't give us a LICENSED Killer. They know the majority of us want licensed killers and yet they still put out 4 originals. They should be ashamed and I wouldn't doubt we never get another licensed killer again which is sad.
-
The Penance
The Revenant
The Bishop
The Cardinal
The Crimson
-
So you know for a fact that they are stuck in the realm with no ifs ands or butts huh? Also I meant their stories where adjusted to fit of how they went and are in the entity’s realm.Shad03 said:@RabidWabbitz The thing with licensed killers is that they have to make sense to fit into the lore. As for this post:
@RabidWabbitz said:
@TheHourMan said:
@RabidWabbitz I definitely can't argue with that lolI would also venture to say that the Entity probably doesn't always keep them stuck in his universe so who is to say that the entity doesn't just borrow them for a while to kill for it. so needless to say "FREE THE PINHEAD" and bring him to DBD Devs!
The killers are trapped in the Entity's realm. Myers, Laurie, Freddy, Quinten, Bubba. All trapped in the realm. Pinhead would not be able to escape.
@RabidWabbitz said:
But all of the characters have been brought in and their stories obviously changed to fit ever so slightly to fit the theme and the same could happen with Pinhead.Their stories weren't changed. Bill was left behind before he woke up on a generator. Amanda and Tapp were sent towards the Fog once they were killed in their canon movies, Freddy and Quentin were going through their movie ending. Poor Nancy is wondering where Freddy and Quentin are.
When a character is taken, it's around the same time as their canon movies. How they arrive is different, but they're still taken nonetheless.
-
@TheHourMan said:
@RabidWabbitz I definitely can't argue with that lolI would also venture to say that the Entity probably doesn't always keep them stuck in his universe so who is to say that the entity doesn't just borrow them for a while to kill for it. so needless to say "FREE THE PINHEAD" and bring him to DBD Devs!
-
But all of the characters have been brought in and their stories obviously changed to fit ever so slightly to fit the theme and the same could happen with Pinhead.TheHourMan said:
While I adore Pinhead and the original 2 Hellraiser movies, I don't think Pinhead would be able to be fit into the lore as a slave of the Entity. Also Pinhead is not malicious. His goal is to induce the ultimate pleasure through sensory and emotional overload and he is already a priest of the Laviathon.RabidWabbitz said:@TheHourMan said:
RabidWabbitz said:@TheHourMan said:
RabidWabbitz said:
all I have to say is if it isn't a Licensed killer then I might be done with DBD as the reason DBD is so big and has kept their followers is because of the licensed killers. the majority of the time when there is a thread asking who everyone thinks the next killer is they say licensed killers which means as a community we want licensed killers. If they put out 4 non-licensed killers in a row then I feel this is a huge cop out on behalf of the DEVs. 3-1 licensed would be a great ratio each year. And if they are using the excuse as it cost to much then that is bull. as you charge people for the benefit of using the licensed killer. Just lame in my book! I disagree. The licensed killers are generally seen as the least favorite for a huge chunk of the community. And the reasoj DbD kept its following is because it's a good game. You could have every licensed killer in movie history and nobody would want your game if it sucked. I have heard soooo many people echo the sentiment of "I hope there is never another licensed killer because the original ones have such better designs."
That's not necessarily my opinion. I am open to a new licensed killer if they fit the themes of the game. I would love to see Candyman. But having something like Ghostface would just be incredibly stupid.
Agree to disagree I guess. but I know that it isn't correct. If there was not famous slashers in this game then the game wouldn't have reached the gamer base as much as it has. you can't tell me that once they announced that Freddy was coming to the game that that didn't automatically get a huge fan base to buy the game (no matter the fact that he sucks or doesn't suck in the game) It was the deciding factor for me when I saw he was in the game. I am excited as hell for the rework! but I digress, without the Famous Slashers DBD would not be where it is today and that is fact!
I agree that it boosted the popularity massively, but I disagree that that is what kept people playing. Freddy and leatherface are considered some of the worst and least used killers, yet people still play the game a lot. I think it drew in a mainstream audience but that it isn't what kept that audience here. Also yes. Freddy's rework is something I am sooo excited for.
In my opinion, the Spirit is the best designed killer in the game. With Huntress being a close second.
I guess I can agree with that! I just hate the fact that Pinhead is not in this game. it frustrates me to no end, and it is a failing franchise that really can't have much demand for a license request. If they put Pinhead in I feel that I would be happy with anything that came after it. but as far as design I think the Huntress slightly beats out the Spirit due to her popularity.
-
@TheHourMan said:
RabidWabbitz said:@TheHourMan said:
RabidWabbitz said:
all I have to say is if it isn't a Licensed killer then I might be done with DBD as the reason DBD is so big and has kept their followers is because of the licensed killers. the majority of the time when there is a thread asking who everyone thinks the next killer is they say licensed killers which means as a community we want licensed killers. If they put out 4 non-licensed killers in a row then I feel this is a huge cop out on behalf of the DEVs. 3-1 licensed would be a great ratio each year. And if they are using the excuse as it cost to much then that is bull. as you charge people for the benefit of using the licensed killer. Just lame in my book! I disagree. The licensed killers are generally seen as the least favorite for a huge chunk of the community. And the reasoj DbD kept its following is because it's a good game. You could have every licensed killer in movie history and nobody would want your game if it sucked. I have heard soooo many people echo the sentiment of "I hope there is never another licensed killer because the original ones have such better designs."
That's not necessarily my opinion. I am open to a new licensed killer if they fit the themes of the game. I would love to see Candyman. But having something like Ghostface would just be incredibly stupid.
Agree to disagree I guess. but I know that it isn't correct. If there was not famous slashers in this game then the game wouldn't have reached the gamer base as much as it has. you can't tell me that once they announced that Freddy was coming to the game that that didn't automatically get a huge fan base to buy the game (no matter the fact that he sucks or doesn't suck in the game) It was the deciding factor for me when I saw he was in the game. I am excited as hell for the rework! but I digress, without the Famous Slashers DBD would not be where it is today and that is fact!
I agree that it boosted the popularity massively, but I disagree that that is what kept people playing. Freddy and leatherface are considered some of the worst and least used killers, yet people still play the game a lot. I think it drew in a mainstream audience but that it isn't what kept that audience here. Also yes. Freddy's rework is something I am sooo excited for.
In my opinion, the Spirit is the best designed killer in the game. With Huntress being a close second.
I guess I can agree with that but I still think that the licensed killers are the whole reason why DBD is where it is! yes they might stay because of others and of course the game is great but without that first peaked interest of licensed killers I don't think it would be any where close to what it is now. I just hate the fact that Pinhead is not in this game. it frustrates me to no end, and it is a failing franchise that really can't have much demand for a license request. If they put Pinhead in I feel that I would be happy with anything that came after it. but as far as design I think the Huntress slightly beats out the Spirit due to her popularity, but as far as mechanics I would agree the Sprit was a well thought out character.
-
@TheHourMan said:
RabidWabbitz said:all I have to say is if it isn't a Licensed killer then I might be done with DBD as the reason DBD is so big and has kept their followers is because of the licensed killers. the majority of the time when there is a thread asking who everyone thinks the next killer is they say licensed killers which means as a community we want licensed killers. If they put out 4 non-licensed killers in a row then I feel this is a huge cop out on behalf of the DEVs. 3-1 licensed would be a great ratio each year. And if they are using the excuse as it cost to much then that is bull. as you charge people for the benefit of using the licensed killer. Just lame in my book!
I disagree. The licensed killers are generally seen as the least favorite for a huge chunk of the community. And the reasoj DbD kept its following is because it's a good game. You could have every licensed killer in movie history and nobody would want your game if it sucked. I have heard soooo many people echo the sentiment of "I hope there is never another licensed killer because the original ones have such better designs."
That's not necessarily my opinion. I am open to a new licensed killer if they fit the themes of the game. I would love to see Candyman. But having something like Ghostface would just be incredibly stupid.
Agree to disagree I guess. but I know that it isn't correct. If there was not famous slashers in this game then the game wouldn't have reached the gamer base as much as it has. you can't tell me that once they announced that Freddy was coming to the game that that didn't automatically get a huge fan base to buy the game (no matter the fact that he sucks or doesn't suck in the game) It was the deciding factor for me when I saw he was in the game. I am excited as hell for the rework! but I digress, without the Famous Slashers DBD would not be where it is today and that is fact!
-
all I have to say is if it isn't a Licensed killer then I might be done with DBD as the reason DBD is so big and has kept their followers is because of the licensed killers. the majority of the time when there is a thread asking who everyone thinks the next killer is they say licensed killers which means as a community we want licensed killers. If they put out 4 non-licensed killers in a row then I feel this is a huge cop out on behalf of the DEVs. 3-1 licensed would be a great ratio each year. And if they are using the excuse as it cost to much then that is bull. as you charge people for the benefit of using the licensed killer. Just lame in my book!
-
@SpacingLlamas said:
@RabidWabbitz said:
@SpacingLlamas said:
@RabidWabbitz said:
@VolantConch1719 said:
First, they'd need to get the legal rights to Jason
Second, he currently has is own game
Third, said game is currently going through legal issues (unless those got resolved and I didn't hear anything).What I'm basically saying is this: A lot of people WANT Jason in DBD, but the fact is that he's not likely to join the cast of Killers, at least for a while.
the legal issues were resolved. he could actually be brought in under different licenses though. Jason has many different licenses that could be drawn from in order to put him in the game. all they have to do is use the remakes license and it is golden.
No they might not be. It was unappealed for unknown reasons as of now.
The company (horror inc) might appeal again and likely will. Which would make Jason impossible for years if it does.Once again it all depends on which licenses are affected. the reason that the game was affected with this lawsuit is because it had all of the Jason licenses tied up in it minus the remake and Jason X of course. So lets say that it is the original license that includes Jason's mother and baghead Jason is the one that is question well that leaves the other Jason's open for others use as long as the original owner of those licenses agrees to it's use. So therefore Jason can be used in other games with no problem.
The entire F13 license is affected by it. Not just a specific movie or jason, though the main problems is with the original first movie it's all being affected regardless.
if you say so. but everything that I have read has been specifically been tied around the first movie. as Remakes are independent of their predecessors then it would not be affected.
-
@SpacingLlamas said:
@RabidWabbitz said:
@VolantConch1719 said:
First, they'd need to get the legal rights to Jason
Second, he currently has is own game
Third, said game is currently going through legal issues (unless those got resolved and I didn't hear anything).What I'm basically saying is this: A lot of people WANT Jason in DBD, but the fact is that he's not likely to join the cast of Killers, at least for a while.
the legal issues were resolved. he could actually be brought in under different licenses though. Jason has many different licenses that could be drawn from in order to put him in the game. all they have to do is use the remakes license and it is golden.
No they might not be. It was unappealed for unknown reasons as of now.
The company (horror inc) might appeal again and likely will. Which would make Jason impossible for years if it does.Once again it all depends on which licenses are affected. the reason that the game was affected with this lawsuit is because it had all of the Jason licenses tied up in it minus the remake and Jason X of course. So lets say that it is the original license that includes Jason's mother and baghead Jason is the one that is question well that leaves the other Jason's open for others use as long as the original owner of those licenses agrees to it's use. So therefore Jason can be used in other games with no problem.
-
@VolantConch1719 said:
First, they'd need to get the legal rights to Jason
Second, he currently has is own game
Third, said game is currently going through legal issues (unless those got resolved and I didn't hear anything).What I'm basically saying is this: A lot of people WANT Jason in DBD, but the fact is that he's not likely to join the cast of Killers, at least for a while.
the legal issues were resolved. he could actually be brought in under different licenses though. Jason has many different licenses that could be drawn from in order to put him in the game. all they have to do is use the remakes license and it is golden.
-
@Stinky said:
Personally i don't get why people think Freddy needs a buff. He's 100% Invisible, quite fast and pulling Survivors into the Dreamworld gives the effect simillar to Thanatophobia and BBQ. Then you get to put Perks on top of that... That's pretty brutal right there.
I've only played him once through an add-on and even without perks i easily wiped the floor with the survivors.if you only played him once then you don't have a great basis to go off. I would suggest playing him at higher ranks and then you will see how obsolete he really is. you can't form a full opinion on anything after only trying them once, just saying!
-
I agree that there is nothing similar about Jason and the Trapper except they are big and have big knives. other wise their powers would be very different I am sure!
-
@Arroz said:
@HatCreature said:
@Arroz said:
@HatCreature said:
I think they're done with that
I dont think so, i commented on the @not_Queen stream and she say who we want..
Oh #########?! Damn that's good news, I might actually start coming up with ideas now.
Me too! for this i created this post, maybe we can have ghostface or the ring? (the ring would be a spirit cosmetic, nah jk) and as survivor we can get Martin Herderson? or Sidney Presscot And I would like a licensed map too
We already have Ghostface, he is also known as The Legion.
-
Pinhead is the only Choice here!
-
@perotx said:
@RabidWabbitz said:
@perotx said:
Not everyone wants the rework.the vast majority do want the rework and that is why they are doing it though.
I don't see a vast majority. Quite a lot of threads pop up explaining how Freddy is actually good and a lot of people jump in to agree. I personally know many people who don't think he needs a rework. It's only a very loud and obnoxious minority who is demanding a rework without actually learning to play Freddy. Besides, even if Freddy was weak, it doesn't necessarily means he needs a rework - just a buff, and a lot of people hold that position as well. I'm okay with the devs being vague about the rework because it probably means it's never going to happen.
keep in mind that the Devs have Stats behind everything that they do. so they can see how many people play every killer and how often everyone dc from killers and so on. so this leads me to believe if they have the stats that back freddy being bad and people not playing him as much that is why you have a re-work in the works. and you say you know many that like it and I can say that I know just as many or more that disagree with your statement so it really just comes down to facts that we do not possess.
-
@perotx said:
Not everyone wants the rework.the vast majority do want the rework and that is why they are doing it though.
-
I am also waiting for some kind of information to come out except just "We are at some point going to work on Freddy" which is such a cop out in my opinion. The Devs have been so stand offish when it comes to anything Freddy related it is sickening. All your Customers and yes I used the word Customers instead of fans or anything else because we did pay for Freddy are waiting for you (The Devs) to give us some timeline and stick to it!
-
@DudeDelicious said:
How about ignoring the lore here. What if gens were invisible and unable to be repaired, and interact with the exit gate switches unless a survivor locates the puzzle box (highlighted by an aura) and summons pinhead. Pinhead can’t injure or interact with survivors at all unless he’s summoned and remains invisible till he is (a bit like Freddy). Pinhead can choose to “un summon” himself at any time because his power will be that he can rapidly speed up gen regression AND (when applicable) regress exit switch progression, applying constant pressure by a survivor needing to choose who will return to the puzzle box. A survivor that takes the risk of summoning pinhead is rewarded with tremendously increased action speed BUT suffers from exposed until they are downed or pinhead chooses to “un summon” to perform the regression power.interesting take on things. I like it but I see the whiners freaking out on this as a killer. killers get mad if they can't hit people all of the time.
-
I think any killer could be used in DBD as long as they take a bit of time making sure it fits with the movies. Hopefully they never release a licensed killer again and give them powers that they don't have like Freddy and his Sandman powers. We don't want to see that again!
-
Please Devs just give us an update of how it is going and an APROX date of release. now I know if you give a date and don't meet it the community will lose their minds so keep it vague on release but close.
-
I am a Freddy main and I have said this forever. I main him because I love Freddy's movies and love him as he is all the same. but with that being said I do think he needs to be changed because he is not Freddy as his powers have nothing to do with Freddy and more to do with the Sandman. I hope that they actually pay attention to the movies and use his ability to change the dream around the survivors to produce kills. The survivors should be in the dream from the start and your battle is to escape and wake up by exiting the gates. he should be able to minipulate the actual things that survivors interact with to mess with them left and right. Freddy is a joker and should be treated as such. The king of dreams
-
I still think the Re-work should be in line of the movies. He should not be putting survivors to sleep! that is the Sandman and not Freddy. The Survivors should be in the dreamworld from the beginning and right when you get in the match Freddy's Voice will say "Welcome to my World!" and his power should be the ability to mess with the survivors with hullicinations such as fake things Fake survivors, Fake Totems, Fake Gens, or even the ability to show that some Survivors are dead by the bottom Left avatars but they really aren't. He then can hit them at will like other Killers. Freddy is one of the TOP Movie Killers and as such should be in the top tier of killers in the game also.
-
I am a Freddy main and I do enjoy Freddy obviously but I want Freddy to be actual Freddy. I don't want him to be the Sandman and do things that are not in Freddy's power range. Freddy as a villain should be in the top tier with Michael Meyers and not in the bottom to mid as he is now. Freddy is a masterful killer in the movies and he should have a more creative feel to him in the games.