Tsulan
Tsulan
About
- Username
- Tsulan
- Joined
- Visits
- 14,849
- Last Active
Comments
-
Dedicated servers could create new problems.HavelmomDaS1 said:
I kinda agree with you, I get accused a lot for lagswitching while I see them skipping around. A lot of people have just lagspikes I guess and it's not intentionally lagswitching. But at least dedicated servers will eliminate the issue of relaying on killers connection and this should be better. HOPEFULLY the killer experience will be still "good" (or maybe even better? You never know how well devs will implement it) in terms of hit detection, cuz one swing into nothingness can extend the chase longer as it should.Tsulan said:
There are far less lag switchers than people claim.Yamaoka said:
What are you trying to say?Tsulan said:
If you think lag switchers are a problem, then you'll gonna have a bad time.Yamaoka said:So no more lag switchers or killers who make you lag by downloading adult content during a chase? Nice. Dedicated servers will also allow the developers to provide new game modes like multiple killers right?
Changing a p2p game to one with dedicated servers is not an easy task.
Apart from the problem that players might live far away from the servers. -
Waving arms means camper.
Some survivors tho use it to call for unhooks. Which is kinda stupid. -
There are far less lag switchers than people claim.Yamaoka said:
What are you trying to say?Tsulan said:
If you think lag switchers are a problem, then you'll gonna have a bad time.Yamaoka said:So no more lag switchers or killers who make you lag by downloading adult content during a chase? Nice. Dedicated servers will also allow the developers to provide new game modes like multiple killers right? -
They need to adjust the offerings and the amount of points the killer can get. Or most survivor mains will have a bad time finding a game.Shad03 said:@Tsulan said:
Shad03 said:@Tsulan said:
So far 7 people out of 60k+ like it.
Looks good.
Probably more, but they are possibly not vocal enough to put in a comment here.
So... uhm... 8?
You're probably right.
Now that the weekend starts, more people will start playing which will have an effect on the queue times.Lel. We will see. I got my sexy Ace shirt and that's really all I need.
-
If you think lag switchers are a problem, then you'll gonna have a bad time.Yamaoka said:So no more lag switchers or killers who make you lag by downloading adult content during a chase? Nice. Dedicated servers will also allow the developers to provide new game modes like multiple killers right? -
So far 7 people out of 60k+ like it.
Looks good. -
Ironically Freddy is supposed to be a endgame killer. Which is where he's the weakest.
-
I know. I've seen Ferdinand. They are evil!Acromio said:@Tsulan said:
Broosmeister said:
Tsulan said:Just had a match where everyone had yellow ping and one survivor had red ping.
Guess who pulled the plug and accused me after the match of lag switching.
The Horse on Crotus Prenn Asylum?
Yeah that evil horse!
-
Nah, I don't stalk other people's profiles for hours.SenzuDuck said:@Tsulan said:
SenzuDuck said:
Tsulan said:
kamisen said:@SenzuDuck said:
Ok... this'll be easy.
Yes, you do have to manually type it, however save it in a file for later user
Very readily available information.
Click their profile
copy and paste their link
copy and paste their link
Use it on this website - https://steamid.io/
You want the Steam ID64 Number
Same as above
While this may be true, for end game chat violations you don't need to do any of the above, making a report will send the chat log to the Moderation Team.
trust me when I say this - reporting works.
Thanks for your reply. The link that was supposed to retrieve the Steam ID did not find the profiles for me. I had to enable URLs in Steam and retrieve the IDs from the URL-addresses. I feel the ticket system is messy nonetheless, as the information from in-game easily could be exported to the ticket system. I shouldn't need to store my DBD-ID in a document on my computer to save time.
It's great that I don't need a picture when reporting in-game chat offenses and that reporting works - makes me happy. Will I get feedback on the report either way?
Nope, you just have to trust that it got handled.
I reported someone ingame and externally, because he wished me that my house burns down with my family inside.
Added him, got a email from bhvr that they took care of it.
Checked his profile: playing DbD.
Pretty good job.Because temporary bans don’t show on profiles, and you can still load the game up even if you’re banned.
I also like to start the game and look at the start screen for hours...
/s
You were looking at their profiles for hours at a time? That's pretty sad.
Maybe you should spend more time learning the mechanics of the game instead of stalking profiles?
How about you?
Isn't it boring to always search for my comments and take every opportunity to belittle me?
Don't you have other things to do? Like matching up with low rank viewers to bully noob killers? -
I also like to start the game and look at the start screen for hours...SenzuDuck said:
Because temporary bans don’t show on profiles, and you can still load the game up even if you’re banned.Tsulan said:
Nope, you just have to trust that it got handled.kamisen said:@SenzuDuck said:
Ok... this'll be easy.
Yes, you do have to manually type it, however save it in a file for later user
Very readily available information.
Click their profilecopy and paste their link
copy and paste their link
Use it on this website - https://steamid.io/
You want the Steam ID64 Number
3. Same as above
4. While this may be true, for end game chat violations you don't need to do any of the above, making a report will send the chat log to the Moderation Team.trust me when I say this - reporting works.
Thanks for your reply. The link that was supposed to retrieve the Steam ID did not find the profiles for me. I had to enable URLs in Steam and retrieve the IDs from the URL-addresses. I feel the ticket system is messy nonetheless, as the information from in-game easily could be exported to the ticket system. I shouldn't need to store my DBD-ID in a document on my computer to save time.
It's great that I don't need a picture when reporting in-game chat offenses and that reporting works - makes me happy. Will I get feedback on the report either way?
I reported someone ingame and externally, because he wished me that my house burns down with my family inside.
Added him, got a email from bhvr that they took care of it.
Checked his profile: playing DbD.
Pretty good job.
/s -
Nope, you just have to trust that it got handled.kamisen said:@SenzuDuck said:
Ok... this'll be easy.
Yes, you do have to manually type it, however save it in a file for later user
Very readily available information.
Click their profilecopy and paste their link
copy and paste their link
Use it on this website - https://steamid.io/
You want the Steam ID64 Number
3. Same as above
4. While this may be true, for end game chat violations you don't need to do any of the above, making a report will send the chat log to the Moderation Team.trust me when I say this - reporting works.
Thanks for your reply. The link that was supposed to retrieve the Steam ID did not find the profiles for me. I had to enable URLs in Steam and retrieve the IDs from the URL-addresses. I feel the ticket system is messy nonetheless, as the information from in-game easily could be exported to the ticket system. I shouldn't need to store my DBD-ID in a document on my computer to save time.
It's great that I don't need a picture when reporting in-game chat offenses and that reporting works - makes me happy. Will I get feedback on the report either way?
I reported someone ingame and externally, because he wished me that my house burns down with my family inside.
Added him, got a email from bhvr that they took care of it.
Checked his profile: playing DbD.
Pretty good job. -
That's what I've been doing all the evening.EntityDispleased said:@Tsulan said:
Play killer and tell me how many points you make per match.
Now compare that to what you make as survivor.Btw, only 1 survivor needs to escape with the lantern.
######### that's totally unfair!
Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna play a little survivor.
-
What? Are you serious?No_Cluie_Louis said:@AdánAR said:
@PhantomMask20763 said:
For survivor it's just easier to grind for coins so most players are just playing that resulting in less killersHere we go again... "For survivors it's easy, event it's so surv sided" like the Halloween Event. Jeez
No the Halloween event was killer sided?
-
Get them before the killer gets them.JammyJewels said:
Played Killer. Got all 4 lanterns they had spawned in and hooked each survivor three times. I’m no pushover when it comes to killer, but even so it still seems to be a double standard, as killers complain when survivors destroy event-based hooks and yet destroying the Survivor event objective is totally fine?Tsulan said:Play killer and tell me how many points you make per match.
Now compare that to what you make as survivor.
Btw, only 1 survivor needs to escape with the lantern.
Survivors can claim red lanterns.
You compete for the same objective. -
-
Yeah that evil horse!Broosmeister said:
The Horse on Crotus Prenn Asylum?Tsulan said:Just had a match where everyone had yellow ping and one survivor had red ping.
Guess who pulled the plug and accused me after the match of lag switching. -
Play killer and tell me how many points you make per match.
Now compare that to what you make as survivor.
Btw, only 1 survivor needs to escape with the lantern. -
Just had a match where everyone had yellow ping and one survivor had red ping.
Guess who pulled the plug and accused me after the match of lag switching. -
Yeah its bugged.
-
This event sucks for killers. The corrupted lanterns reset to quickly.
Just got a match where i got 2 kills and 2 disconnected = 12 points.
As surivor i even had a match where i got 45 points, while dying in front of the gate.
Bugged and unfun -
I think you answered the reason why survivors have long queues yourself.AdánAR said:I would do but it's not fun as survivor. When i go killer i always got so sweaty SWF groups and I have to go sweaty too with my Spirit (I play her a lot as killer) and playing that way it's so boring. I got 4K but it's stressful sometimes
-
Other killers reworks are more urgent.Freudentrauma said:@Tsulan said:
I think the list is shorter if you ask what killers don't need buffs or changes: Nurse & BillyNurse and Billy are in need of AddOn rework. I would currently say Hag might be fine as she is. Everyone else could use some tweaks and changes.
-
I think the list is shorter if you ask what killers don't need buffs or changes: Nurse & Billy
-
@Fenrir said:
MojoTheFabulous said:Legit I would buy something like that because it looks pretty damn cool. Just add a 4th outfit slot for special things like that and i'd be all in.
If you want killers to see you behind stuff sure
Halloween Medkit anyone?
-
@AdánAR said:
It is just me or finding a match is taking so much time since the event started? And how can i fix that?You can fix that by playing killer. You´ll get instant lobbies.
-
Play killer, get instant lobbies.tanya3489 said:My group of friends and I have had to deal with half hour to an hour wait time for about a month now. We're about [BAD WORD] done with it -
Good to see that you have no idea of how programming works.
-
Monstrous shrine?
#########? What's wrong with the most useless killer perk? -
Known bug.
Which has been around for ages btw. -
I don't know. How do YOU do it?Paddy4583 said:
Patch 1.8.0Tsulan said:
Wrong.ad19970 said:@Tsulan said:
No_Cluie_Louis said:@ad19970 said:
@No_Cluie_Louis said: @ad19970 said: @SenzuDuck said: @No_Cluie_Louis said: @SenzuDuck said: @Master said: @ad19970 said: @Master said: @ad19970 said: @Tsulan said: ReneAensland said: @Tsulan said: Raccoon said:Tsulan said: ReneAensland said: @Tsulan said: ReneAensland said:
@Tsulan said: ReneAensland said:
30 minutes ago. 2 minute video proving Face Camping exists. It's Toxic. And Baby killers DC just like DS users. faCe cAmpiNg wAs reMovEd doNt geT caUghT iTs thE suRvivOrs faUlt
Unhooked = no face camping. lol OooOoOOoooookay. Whatever you say buddy.
Want a dev stream where the devs explain what face camping was and how they removed it? lol No thanks, I don't want to be told what's Face Camping and what isn't by Rank 20 Devs. Thanks though. Oh really? What a surprise! You claim something, I disapprove, want to give you solid facts, and it's suddenly not interesting anymore. Yeah it's hard to face the truth after telling bullshit. His feelings and randomly capitalized letters were no match for you! I even searched the video and prepared everything to crush his dreams...
sigh
You're [BAD WORD] hilarious.
Reading this entire comment section is a breath of fresh air, but I'm guessing people like you have to be in the opposition even though a crap ton of people in this comment section agreed with the OP.
"I think you just got to be in the "out" group. Whoever's on top, whoever's in power, whoever's successful, you gotta be on the other side or you don't feel like the smartest guy in the room. All you are, my dear, is a contrarian."
This defines people like yourself.
You forgot the people that agreed with me.
You can call a dog a "cat" as often as you want. But it will still be a dog.
Why on gods earth are you two even discussing the definition of a word? Like what kind of time waste is that? Who cares what exactly facecamping has meant back then, and what OP means with facecamping and if he is using the wrong term. I think it's pretty obvious that with facecamping OP means a killer that is camping a hooked survivor, standing right by him and not leaving the hook. Who cares if this isn't actually facecamping? Especially since the removal of facecamping didn't change a lot anyways. Doesn't really have anything to do what the OP was getting at.
Are you joking?
Back in the days you were actually able to secure a kill via camping. Nowadays you cant bodyblock away from the hook while survivors can bodyblock you from the hooking prompt. ALSO, nowdays they got BT, unhook invulnerability, swivel hooks AND the faster unhook animation
You can still just grab the survivor when he tries to unhook right in front of you
No you cant, thanks to bodyblockign and the new unhook animation that you can cancel instantly
Oh my god, multiple survivors just swarming the killer... sounds like you could hit the unhooker twice and OMG have someone else to camp its like playing DBD but the survivors come to you.
Wahoooooo!
Thank you, every time i comment about something killers do unfairly on these forums, i get attacked and told i'm an idiot (even though i play more killer than survivor). Like i get survivors used to be OP and SWF still is but that doesn't mean killers aren't OP in some aspects too. It's nice to see someone actually back me up for once in saying face camping is a low skilled strategy that may work, but it's boring and you only win by boring the survivors to death... literally.
Yea, like his whole argument is based on wanting one particular survivor dead, he doesn't care that if someone does come to save it makes it INCREDIBLY easy to get that person on the hook as a trade.
Killers like that are honestly the worst, they just want the first person they hook dead as soon as possible and doesn't matter if they can hook someone else for more points.
It's because it can be effective. Once one survivor is dead the killer will have more of an advantage. You can not fault people for using a tactic the devs have made viable. It's on the devs to make not camping more rewarding and camping and tunneling less rewarding.
Well then how come in the past when i have suggested to nerf unjustified camping and buff leaving the hook, people have attacked me with the good ol' cAmPiNg WaS iNtEnTiOnAl jUsT dOnT gEt CaUgHt
Cause some killers mains want their easier way to get kills kept in the game. As simple as that. Or maybe they fear that when nerfing camping killers will just suffer more from gen rush.
To me it's clear, rewarding non camping killers more and rewarding camping and tunneling campers less is not just a balance improvement, but a fundamental design improvement for the game that improves the experience of both sides for the majority of the player base.
Well i totally agree, so i wish people like @master and @Tsulan would stop claiming it's balanced
Quote me on where I call it balanced.
Stop putting words into my mouth.I think he said that because you and Master seem to be against any nerf to camping and changes that would reward killers more for not camping.
Face camping had to be removed, because there was no way around it. Face camping was removed by the devs. I only think it's wrong to call it face camping when it doesn't exist anymore.
I'm against camping but I know that sometimes it's a necessary evil. Something to slow the game down.
I'm against the BBQ nerf, because killers need a reason to leave the hook. But that reason should be voluntary and not because of punishment.
Camping is a desired strategy by the devs. Otherwise Insidious wouldn't exist.
I tried insidious a few times and find it utterly boring. So I usually don't commit to camping, but as any other killer, I get called out for it. Even when I use MYC or Devour Hope.
Again nothing removed, just added ability to unhook from all angles, how do you even know how to turn on an electronic devise and operate it, when you can’t even get your head round the term face camping?😂😂😂 -
Last time the devs revealed the amount of SWF matches, it was 70%ad19970 said:@Tsulan said:
I know this might be an unpopular opinion, but I think the devs should incorporate ingame voice chat. Just for survivors. So no external voice com is required.
Remove all the information the devs gave survivors in a desperate attempt to balance solo to swf.
Then balance the game around voice chat.Don't like that 12 year old kid that screams into your ear? Press the mute button.
That's the problem though. If the game and all it's killers is balanced around voice comms, than every survivor that doesn't want to deal with voice comms will have quite the disadvantage to other survivors.
On the other hand there doesn't really seem to be a different way to balance it, since people don't like the idea of survivors getting to much information. But if all killers were balanced around 4 man swf squads that play quite optimally, I fear the game will lose a lot of solo survivor players, or even swf players that don't use voice comms to play as organized as possible.
I doubt this number went down.
The devs want to balance SWF by giving solos more information. Which is ridiculous.
Most killer perks that affect survivors are giving killers a disadvantage. Since survivors can see the perk affecting them before they hear the heartbeat.
Same goes for exposed and hex totems.
Lullaby warning appears before it even has a effect. Killer doesn't have those indications btw. He can only see if there is 1 obsession perk in the match. That's it.
Kinda unfair don't you think? -
Wrong.ad19970 said:@Tsulan said:
No_Cluie_Louis said:@ad19970 said:
@No_Cluie_Louis said: @ad19970 said: @SenzuDuck said: @No_Cluie_Louis said: @SenzuDuck said: @Master said: @ad19970 said: @Master said: @ad19970 said: @Tsulan said: ReneAensland said: @Tsulan said: Raccoon said:Tsulan said: ReneAensland said: @Tsulan said: ReneAensland said:
@Tsulan said: ReneAensland said:
30 minutes ago. 2 minute video proving Face Camping exists. It's Toxic. And Baby killers DC just like DS users. faCe cAmpiNg wAs reMovEd doNt geT caUghT iTs thE suRvivOrs faUlt
Unhooked = no face camping. lol OooOoOOoooookay. Whatever you say buddy.
Want a dev stream where the devs explain what face camping was and how they removed it? lol No thanks, I don't want to be told what's Face Camping and what isn't by Rank 20 Devs. Thanks though. Oh really? What a surprise! You claim something, I disapprove, want to give you solid facts, and it's suddenly not interesting anymore. Yeah it's hard to face the truth after telling bullshit. His feelings and randomly capitalized letters were no match for you! I even searched the video and prepared everything to crush his dreams...
sigh
You're [BAD WORD] hilarious.
Reading this entire comment section is a breath of fresh air, but I'm guessing people like you have to be in the opposition even though a crap ton of people in this comment section agreed with the OP.
"I think you just got to be in the "out" group. Whoever's on top, whoever's in power, whoever's successful, you gotta be on the other side or you don't feel like the smartest guy in the room. All you are, my dear, is a contrarian."
This defines people like yourself.
You forgot the people that agreed with me.
You can call a dog a "cat" as often as you want. But it will still be a dog.
Why on gods earth are you two even discussing the definition of a word? Like what kind of time waste is that? Who cares what exactly facecamping has meant back then, and what OP means with facecamping and if he is using the wrong term. I think it's pretty obvious that with facecamping OP means a killer that is camping a hooked survivor, standing right by him and not leaving the hook. Who cares if this isn't actually facecamping? Especially since the removal of facecamping didn't change a lot anyways. Doesn't really have anything to do what the OP was getting at.
Are you joking?
Back in the days you were actually able to secure a kill via camping. Nowadays you cant bodyblock away from the hook while survivors can bodyblock you from the hooking prompt. ALSO, nowdays they got BT, unhook invulnerability, swivel hooks AND the faster unhook animation
You can still just grab the survivor when he tries to unhook right in front of you
No you cant, thanks to bodyblockign and the new unhook animation that you can cancel instantly
Oh my god, multiple survivors just swarming the killer... sounds like you could hit the unhooker twice and OMG have someone else to camp its like playing DBD but the survivors come to you.
Wahoooooo!
Thank you, every time i comment about something killers do unfairly on these forums, i get attacked and told i'm an idiot (even though i play more killer than survivor). Like i get survivors used to be OP and SWF still is but that doesn't mean killers aren't OP in some aspects too. It's nice to see someone actually back me up for once in saying face camping is a low skilled strategy that may work, but it's boring and you only win by boring the survivors to death... literally.
Yea, like his whole argument is based on wanting one particular survivor dead, he doesn't care that if someone does come to save it makes it INCREDIBLY easy to get that person on the hook as a trade.
Killers like that are honestly the worst, they just want the first person they hook dead as soon as possible and doesn't matter if they can hook someone else for more points.
It's because it can be effective. Once one survivor is dead the killer will have more of an advantage. You can not fault people for using a tactic the devs have made viable. It's on the devs to make not camping more rewarding and camping and tunneling less rewarding.
Well then how come in the past when i have suggested to nerf unjustified camping and buff leaving the hook, people have attacked me with the good ol' cAmPiNg WaS iNtEnTiOnAl jUsT dOnT gEt CaUgHt
Cause some killers mains want their easier way to get kills kept in the game. As simple as that. Or maybe they fear that when nerfing camping killers will just suffer more from gen rush.
To me it's clear, rewarding non camping killers more and rewarding camping and tunneling campers less is not just a balance improvement, but a fundamental design improvement for the game that improves the experience of both sides for the majority of the player base.
Well i totally agree, so i wish people like @master and @Tsulan would stop claiming it's balanced
Quote me on where I call it balanced.
Stop putting words into my mouth.I think he said that because you and Master seem to be against any nerf to camping and changes that would reward killers more for not camping.
Face camping had to be removed, because there was no way around it. Face camping was removed by the devs. I only think it's wrong to call it face camping when it doesn't exist anymore.
I'm against camping but I know that sometimes it's a necessary evil. Something to slow the game down.
I'm against the BBQ nerf, because killers need a reason to leave the hook. But that reason should be voluntary and not because of punishment.
Camping is a desired strategy by the devs. Otherwise Insidious wouldn't exist.
I tried insidious a few times and find it utterly boring. So I usually don't commit to camping, but as any other killer, I get called out for it. Even when I use MYC or Devour Hope.
-
Is this minesweeper?Paddy4583 said:
You are almost there, come on...Tsulan said:
Based on your other posts, I could absolutely believe that you would think that.Paddy4583 said:
Oh no I just got face camped by a survivor who stood in front of a chest stopping the search prompt....Tsulan said:@Peanits or @not_Queen could you please settle this?
Explain us who is right please. Since this leads nowhere.
Not being able to unhook is not the same as the killer standing next to the hook. -
I remember you from the steam forum.PiiFree said:@Shad03 said:
@PiiFree said:
I highly doubt this was solo. Maybe you were, but the other 3 were not.Even then, that match should never happen. I remember my first Halo games back when I was forced to use Xbox. Jesus, I don't want Dead by Daylight going through that just because two people of different ranks can exist.
Isn't there a system that takes both ranks and goes through a medium rank?
(If someone was rank 1 and their friend was rank 10, then the killer they'd match up to would be rank 4-8?)
I totally agree, the matchmaking is absolute garbage but I usually only have such huge problems when in SWFs.
I played with a friend in duos when he just started playing DbD. This is how the lobby ended up like (He's top with most points, I'm the guy that died and the others were randoms, not part of our group):
What are you doing on rank 16?
Shouldn't you be much higher? -
How long have you been playing?LegitAdventurer said:
I'm obviously not the only one who feels this way. Have I played against toxic teabaggy survivors? Sure. Did it completely ruin the game for me? No. I think people just take things a little too seriously, no?ClogWench said:Local Man Has No Problems: "Everyone else is wrong!"
More at 11
Edit: also I never said everyone else is wrong. I made this post to bring on discussion. My opinion is not law. It's just an opinion. We don't have to agree to get along. -
-
We got what we deserve. I wonder what the next killer is.powerbats said:@Tsulan said:
People complained that stealth is boring and chases are fun. Now the devs released a killer for that exact situation. Aaaand everyone disconnects.
I hate the merry go round simulator as both sides and prefer stealth both sides and now have to laugh that Legion is destroying all the merry go round simulator people.
Sadly he also makes stealth play really hard due to heartbeats and even hiding in a locker doesn't help once he goes into frenzy.
-
Running in circlesartist said:
doesnt matter if he's good or bad, what matters is that he's boring and removes all skill from the game for both sidesLegitAdventurer said:Everyone: legion is the worst killer. Wooooow.
Also everyone:
Skill
Please pick one -
People complained that stealth is boring and chases are fun. Now the devs released a killer for that exact situation. Aaaand everyone disconnects.fluffybunny said:@Tsulan said:
powerbats said:@Tsulan said:
Am I the only one who thinks that this is Freddy 2.0?
People disconnecting against the weakest killer.
They sure must enjoy playing against nurse 24/7
I wouldn't call him the weakest killer since Frank's+Stab Wounds+moonwalk equals no skill/no chance=4k.
I think you know my opinion on killers that are only decent with specific addons.
Don't want to spend 150k bloodpoints on the web to get a decent match.His power tells you where everyone nearby is (counters stealth), makes people have to waste time healing, and is rather quick. At worst, he's a medium killer and his add-ons make him a nightmare to go against as there is little to no counter. It's really easy to tunnel on him. I don't DC unless I absolutely have to (game crashes, can't escape, etc.), but those are some of the issues I've heard regarding him. People were so quick to say he's weak, though he really isn't.
-
I think you know my opinion on killers that are only decent with specific addons.powerbats said:@Tsulan said:
Am I the only one who thinks that this is Freddy 2.0?
People disconnecting against the weakest killer.
They sure must enjoy playing against nurse 24/7I wouldn't call him the weakest killer since Frank's+Stab Wounds+moonwalk equals no skill/no chance=4k.
Don't want to spend 150k bloodpoints on the web to get a decent match. -
The playerbase could be bigger, if we had casual.Tenebro said:@Tsulan said:
Hell no! There is already way to much information on what killer perks affect the survivor. No need to pay attention. Just look at the info screen. Survivors were originally supposed to be clueless. Not have all the information served on a silver platter.Then you have SWF, who have this information for free. Even if I like running around clueless, I prefer having more information for a more balanced game. Giving something like kindred, bond and empathy by default could be a good base to start balancing killers, while reducing the gap between swf and solo.
Splitting queues in "ranked" and "casual" was proposed multiple times by the community, but the player base isn't big enough: even with 1 queue, sometimes you have to wait a while to find a game.
I also want hardcore btw. -
Am I the only one who thinks that this is Freddy 2.0?
People disconnecting against the weakest killer.
They sure must enjoy playing against nurse 24/7 -
Nerf moris again?
Why? -
Say thx to the removed region lock in order to get faster matches.
Wanna bet that dedicated servers will have a similar problem? -
The devs
-
I know this might be an unpopular opinion, but I think the devs should incorporate ingame voice chat. Just for survivors. So no external voice com is required.
Remove all the information the devs gave survivors in a desperate attempt to balance solo to swf.
Then balance the game around voice chat.
Don't like that 12 year old kid that screams into your ear? Press the mute button. -
Hell no! There is already way to much information on what killer perks affect the survivor. No need to pay attention. Just look at the info screen. Survivors were originally supposed to be clueless. Not have all the information served on a silver platter.
-
If I'm wrong I'm not to proud to admit my mistake.SenzuDuck said:@Tsulan said:
@Peanits or @not_Queen could you please settle this?
Explain us who is right please. Since this leads nowhere.But... I thought you had all that concrete evidence in that video you were going to post...
Or with further examination have you figured out nothing you've said is actually true and would like to grasp at even more straws as to possibly being correct?
You however seem to like to avoid those situations.
I mean, when you are right, then you have nothing to lose. You can mark another mistake of me and always come back to call me out on it.
Remember I offered you peace 3 times. Since there is no reason to keep up this personal vendetta you seem to have with me. -
If you tunnel with Freddy, you play him wrong.TRGraybles said:@ReneAensland said:
"I'm so fed up of people saying just do gens to counter hard campers, when in reality, sure it usually ends up in 2 kills and 2 escapes, everyone's happy right? Wrong. The killer had a boring game standing in front of the hook, 2 survivors had a boring game being hooked and sitting afk, waiting to die, and the other 2 did gens all game. People justifying it as a strat doesn't make it any more fun for either side. I fully understand if it's justified, but so often it's not and it's just plain boring."Agreed. 100%
It all depends really,
Killers who take notice of the Lobby will know when there are a case of 4-man SWFing going on. You can set your clock to it if there is that group they will come in for the save, it's easier to let them come to you then running all over the map risking a hook save and all for nothing.Freddy really thrives against those 4-man SWF groups since every save is 2 people in the dream world and a tunnel chase, to get the weakest player out of the game asap! If you know Freddy is at the hook (and you know when you hear his song) then it's dumb to save your friend 'cause you actually will get him tunneled into the ground again! The fact that you will make it out alive is a dick move to your friend and you really can't blame a killer for playing like that when it's you who has to decide when the best moment for the save is!