RealKamakaze

@DerpyPlayz said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2070680#Comment_2070680
In any case, IT is NOT bannable to kill survivors for any reason other then cheating.
Imagine if it were, special requirements that you could meet to kill a survivors and then get banned for it that would be dumb.
Tunneling, Camping, ect is also not bannable and its also a terrible strat depending on the survivors.

I don't agree with camping or tunnelling unless it's deserved or a counter and the reason for that is it doesn't teach new killers how to counter looping or mind game so when they get to rank 13 - 15, when they go against smarter survivors they loose really, really easily and this just breaks matchmaking even more. If a killer camps or tunnels me I die on hook not only because it's a waste of my time but because I am not gonna sit there and let a killer sit smacking me on hook being toxic, killers like that need to get good. I mean a perfect example of a player like this was a prestige 3 Cannibal that was camping me on hook with Insidious and when my friend got me off hook obviously he tunnelled me only to DC instantly when my friend sabotaged the hook I was on. That killer is a perfect example of someone who was put against survivors not on the same skill level as him due to the bad matchmaking and him never learning to play the game good.

in Is This Bannable? Comment by RealKamakaze April 18, 2021

@BubbaDredge said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2123150#Comment_2123150
I misunderstood. You have to admit we see that ######### a lot, I'm just used to lots of crying.

I mean I have come across killers that fake farm before but usually I just leave to the other side of the map and avoid them considering killers are either extremely toxic or pissed off due to the terrible matchmaking putting them against red ranks when they are like rank 13. That's the reason I fake farmed, the bad matchmaking. The kid that got extremely mardy cause I killed him by fake farming was like a rank 4 obviously he was used to being put against bad killers due to the bad matchmaking so when he looses one game he was in tears bawling his eyes out cause I was being "toxic" when fact of the matter is he probably does the exact same or similar thing.

in Is This Bannable? Comment by RealKamakaze April 18, 2021

@lob said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2122809#Comment_2122809
but killer who are balanced get nerf simply because surviour want fun killers want to have fun too

Well yeah cause every time a survivor gets mardy about a survivor being "OP" the developers nerf it when in reality it has nothing to do with the killer being OP it's more to do with things like broken hitboxes, the survivor using miserable perks, the survivor looping like an 8yr old on a meri-go-round or the killer actually just being ya know good at the game.

in Is dbd survivour sided Comment by RealKamakaze April 18, 2021

@BubbaDredge said:
"No fair, a killer was playing the game, but not in the way I wanted! Everything a killer does is toxic, I am a crybaby!"
No, playing killer is NOT bannable. We can kill you however we want to, killing you in a way that gets points is THE OBJECT OF THE GAME.

Do you literally know why I made this post? I made this post because I did this in a game and one of the very upset players told me it was bannable. I said I was a survivor because people on the forum seem to be very judgmental just like you. I feel as if you are a player that sits in front of pallets t-bagging the killer then gets mardy when they get tunnelled. Also let me explain what I consider a toxic build. I consider a build toxic if it provides an unfair advantage towards the killer while they themselves act in a way that is toxic. For example a Huntress with the best anti-genrush build in the game who camps and tunnels with Iridescent Heads launching hatchets from across the map.

in Is This Bannable? Comment by RealKamakaze April 18, 2021

Honestly this is a good concept, it has it's issues obviously but overall it's a good concept that I think would suit the game. Obviously I'm not a dev but I think they should really consider some of these concepts.

in Chapter concept: Inhumane thoughts Comment by RealKamakaze April 5, 2021

@BubbaDredge said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2076279#Comment_2076279
Thing is, the developers developed the game. If you didn't want to play it, you shouldn't have bought it.

Look that's my opinion and personally I think the developers but little effort in making the game fair providing bs excuses every time a bug or cheat is mentioned. I mean hitboxes, animations, sound effects, matchmaking, ranking, Bloodpoints, Iridescent shards, Auric cells, the Tomes, challenges, OP Perks, pallets and windows are all broken in Dead By Daylight. Have they been fixed yet? No they haven't and I make this argument every time someone make out the developers put in effort. Look this is my opinion and if a moderator on this Forum wants to ban me or mute me for having a simple opinion about this game, it's issues and the devs then that's fine because I know plenty of people agree with this statement.

in 2 perks to rule all (camping killers) Comment by RealKamakaze April 5, 2021

@Redd said:
And the onus is on either the survivors to punish it and/or the devs to balance the game so that it no longer works. Frankly, that honestly means that the devs will have to do further balance changes if they really want to stop camping; because we all know survivors aren't really going to ever punish it.
The entire goal of the killer is to sacrifice the survivors. The primary way to achieve this is to slow the game down as much as possible so that you have as much time as possible to do your job. When successful, camping occupies the time of at least two survivors left in the game. Camping is considered successful whenever one survivor is on the hook, at least one survivor is sitting nearby doing nothing of much value for their team, and either the camped survivor progresses at least one hook state or you manage to down someone else (trading hooks counts). Camping is no longer successful when the remaining unhooked survivors all go do generators and/or when you completely lose your bait.
When you play killer long enough; you can sometimes get a feel for how certain survivors will act in a match. And sometimes you can tell that at least one or more survivors is overly altruistic for one reason or another. You are sometimes able to make an educated judgment call that one or more survivors will reward camping and that it might be a viable strategy in some games. Furthermore, you sometimes are heavily encouraged to try camping as a strategy because you get this feeling in a game where you would otherwise obviously lose due to how the game has been progressing. In this situation, you are making an educated gamble that camping will pay off and that you will be able to sacrifice more survivors by camping than you will by abandoning the hook. These educated gambles, especially against SWF and high rank survivors, will often turn 1K-2K games into 3Ks and even 4Ks, because survivors often will refuse to leave a hook alone even when it is clearly in their best interest to just do generators. This is often due to a mix of empathy for the hooked "teammate", boredom, greed for blood points, etc. In fact camping is particularly viable if the survivors have a "farmer" on their team; and you might even want to let a particularly bad farmer "escape" so that they'll keep farming their teammates. Finally, on rare occassions camping can be an educated gamble that you are definitely going to lose if the person to be camped ever gets off the hook; so you really do need to secure that kill and nothing is "lost" if the survivors "punish" you.
Please also note, I am not just talking about camping straight away. All of this can and does apply to situations where only 2 or 3 survivors are left in the game and/or situations where you've already progressed hook states "fairly" but no one is dead yet.
Now is camping a fun strategy? Well that is up for debate. It's definitely not fun for the survivors, and I personally do not find it that fun as killer, but some other killers seem to enjoy it a whole lot, and the devs seem to consider it a legitimate strategy whose counter is "just doing gens" (lol like survivors are going to do that). But the point of this post was/is to say that, from at least a strict number of sacrifices perspective, camping can be and often is a good strategy for getting kills. If it was a bad strategy, people wouldn't rank up at mid-high ranks by doing it. So please stop spreading the myths that this doesn't work and/or that people should stop complaining about it just because survivors can "punish" it. I can't force my random teammates to do anything lol.

Well look at it this way. Strategy is putting effort and thought into a plan that should grant you success, is sitting in front of a hook staring at a survivor smacking him over and over putting in any effort? Yes, and no. In some situations camping would be a good strategy especially if you want to get rid of a certain survivor for example if they are good at running you round, body block, have DS etc then camping or tunnelling would be the best thing to do to remove the biggest threat straight away. However there are also times where camping is not a fair and legit strategy that ruins everyone's game just for the fun of it. For example if from the start of the match a Wraith hooks someone and just sits a good enough distance away to stop anyone from seeing him or saving him while invisible, this is not strategy this is borderline toxicity. I consider it toxicity due to the fact that the person you hooked will not have a fun or fair game, automatically loosing the second he get's hooked. The developers tell people to counter camping by sitting on hook and waiting while people gen-rush but why should a player do that when they aren't having fun? I understand you can't win every game and you should help your team but you play to have fun and sitting on hook watching your team loiter around gens like a herd of cattle is not fun. This is why if I get camped I just die on hook because I am playing to have a fun game where I can actually do something, is it selfish? Yes it is but camping is not fair and I will not play games with killers that use unfair tactics to win the game. If the devs think camping is a fair strategy that's their opinion but in my opinion I think it's an unfair strategy that should be banned. I mean in reality why should I help my team when most players just play selfish anyway, I have been left on hook to die multiple times by team mates that have full ability to come save me.

in Camping is a legitimate strategy that works well. Comment by RealKamakaze April 5, 2021

Look I don't care if the developers think camping is a "legitimate strategy" because in reality it isn't. Strategy is putting effort into something, sitting in front of a hook is not putting in any effort, those players that pretend their farming and then kill everyone put in more effort because they have to set it all up and make it seem like their farming.

in 2 perks to rule all (camping killers) Comment by RealKamakaze April 4, 2021

@papichulo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2070794#Comment_2070794
tbh at this point you cant use the words "fair, deserved, etc." and what your telling me rn is that killers cant kill survivors using their own strategies JUST BECAUSE it isnt deserved? dude-

I mean if you camp you get gen-rushed, that's fair. You tunnel you get body blocked, that's fair. You slug you get people hiding that's fair.

You run the killer round you get tunnelled, that's fair. You body block you get slugged, that's fair. You try to BP farm you get tricked, that's fair.

There is always a counter to these shady underhand strategies and they may work for a while why you are a lower rank but when you start getting to green rank people are just gonna counter them and your gonna keep loosing over and over so it's best to just get good at mind games, countering people running you round and stopping gen-rushers over killing 1 person. Obviously with better perks, items, add-ons, offerings, killers and survivors this becomes easier. I say it's not deserved because your "strategies" can ruin the game depending on the team your put against. If you camp and tunnel against a bunch of rank 20s then your gonna get an auto win without putting in any effort. I wouldn't even call camping, tunnelling and slugging a strategy unless you use it to counter something the survivors are doing or it's the best way to play for the killer your using. Sitting next to a player with Insidious as Wraith is not a strategy it's just playing bad. Sorry to break this all to you but it's true.