Orion
Orion
About
- Username
- Orion
- Joined
- Visits
- 124
- Last Active
Comments
-
@StarLost said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2551147#Comment_2551147
What?
No, an opinion can be wrong.
'The sky is green' is a wrong opinion.
An opinion can also be wrong if it's not supported by evidence, or at the very least, a bad opinion.
No, that's a statement of fact, just like OP's claim is.
An opinion would be "orange juice tastes bad". It's a matter of personal preference. "The sky is green" is not an opinion, it's a statement of fact that can be easily verified to be wrong. Likewise, "this killer is bad" is not an opinion, it is a statement of fact.
-
4 survivors, 5 totems, 1 killer. That's why.
EDIT: Oh, and survivors have totem-locating perks and items. Killers do not.
-
@TacitusKilgore said:
I do my best. Theres not much else i can do, and i find it important to see things through no matter what. No matter how toxic they are, no matter how much i am unable to escape/kill them, i will try until the bitter end. What else could i possibly do?
Giving up and getting a cup of tea seems quite popular, based on my unofficial polling of two people.
-
Either keep playing or give up and get a cup of tea while they finish the gens and teabag at the gates.
-
@KerJuice said:
Not to go off topic, so it’s true all these computers data mining NFT’s & Crypto are accelerating climate change? I’m guessing electricity?
Pretty much. In countries that rely mostly on renewable sources for household consumption, it wouldn't be that big of a deal, but the people who do those things are often not in such countries.
However, as someone else also said, whole industries are far more polluting than this. That's not to say we should ignore either one, but to put things in perspective.
-
Red Forest. The rain visual, as well as the actual maps in it, are just stunning.
-
@xEa said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553916#Comment_2553916
If a map is so hated that it gets banned all the time, there might be a reason why this is and we should be happy we actually have a way to get rid of it. Who cares if one person misses it if everybody else is happy?
The reason is that people don't know how to play on it and refuse to learn. That's all. Every new killer, map, offering, perk, and so on, gets hated on for that exact reason.
-
@Billy_Capră said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2554410#Comment_2554410
Yeah, it does seem to have gotten better recently. Maybe they did add a check around the Pinhead release. But, yes, truly random generation will make things seem less random.
That's the human brain for you. No understanding of statistics, always searching for patterns, even in random data.
-
@MeltingPenguins said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553901#Comment_2553901
heh.
So, I looked through the Instagram posts and... that post does not exist. By the formatting on it it is a response to a comment. However, no such conversation can be found on Stephsciullo's account. Meanwhile, the other account in that screenshot is conveniently privat. BUT:
In order to comment on someone's posts etc, you need to follow them. Which isn't the case here. Thus no communication can have taken place between stephsciullo and blindninja1
EDIT: checked doug's account as well, and guess what: NOTHING
EDIT 2: I'm not entirely certain on this one, as I don't know at what character-count instagram starts a new line, but I think in this case, given the charactercount in the names the 'So' of the supposed response should be right behind the 1, not on a new line.
Hey, look at that, someone "did their own research", as OP put it, and found exactly what I suspected: nothing.
-
@KerJuice said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553643#Comment_2553643
Key phrase “most likely.” Didn’t say definitely, absolutely, or positively- just plain “most likely.” I know there is room for it to be quite the opposite so that’s why I phrased it that way.
Yes, I saw your "key phrase". It's still a mistake to assume anything either way. Social media easily results in an echo chamber, especially since people who are enjoying the game tend to spend more time actually playing it than complaining about it.
-
@Rey_512 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553820#Comment_2553820
He did the research for you refused to watch the video he linked.
Does the video contain a link to the supposed Instagram post from her official account that someone else tried (and failed) to find, or just a screenshot of said post? I've only seen a screenshot thus far, and that can be easily faked. Here's the comment I mentioned, for reference:
@MeltingPenguins said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553901#Comment_2553901
heh.
So, I looked through the Instagram posts and... that post does not exist. By the formatting on it it is a response to a comment. However, no such conversation can be found on Stephsciullo's account. Meanwhile, the other account in that screenshot is conveniently privat. BUT:
In order to comment on someone's posts etc, you need to follow them. Which isn't the case here. Thus no communication can have taken place between stephsciullo and blindninja1
EDIT: checked doug's account as well, and guess what: NOTHING
EDIT 2: I'm not entirely certain on this one, as I don't know at what character-count instagram starts a new line, but I think in this case, given the charactercount in the names the 'So' of the supposed response should be right behind the 1, not on a new line.
@Impose said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553731#Comment_2553731
Tell me you've never worked in PR without telling me you've never worked for PR
Already had this discussion. Let's chalk it up to cultural differences. Here, we value common sense (meaning we don't put our information on random websites or give them to random people just because they claim to be affiliated with something we know and trust) and time off.
-
@xEa said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553895#Comment_2553895
Not sure what you mean.
For example i hate RCPD. Whats so bad about it, if i get the option to simply ban it? Because its 1/40? 1/40 is already to much. Its a game, it should be fun
I like RCPD. Not playing it is not fun for me, and constantly having to use an offering to (maybe) be able to play it isn't fun either. Now what?
-
@dezzmont said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553882#Comment_2553882
Yeah that is nice and all but that is philosophy, and communications is a science. You can talk about how discussions and public discourse SHOULD be all you want, but communications is the study of how it actually plays out, and the go to smart play in these situations is to deliberately take on the burden of providing accurate information about your brand and its activities, because failing to do that causes anxiety among your consumer base and rumors to spread, mutate, and grow.
BHVR isn't in the debate club. WE are having a conversation, and between US there is an expectation claims are backed up, but that isn't the same as saying 'BHVR should behave like rational actors and perfect logicians' which literally my entire field as well as over a hundred years of psychological research says isn't true. You got a bad case of 'too online' and are looking this purely as an internal community debate rather than a practical concern for a company that employs 600 people which should be (assuming this rumor is untrue) treating this like an attack on their brand by a bad actor and not something to hit snooze on.
WE are having a conversation, and between US there is an expectation claims are backed up
Yes, that's what I'm saying, that @MongolPSR needs to back up their claim, thank you for agreeing.
-
@dezzmont said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553866#Comment_2553866
Perception is reality - Lee Atwater
Burden of proof is a concept of law, not of PR.
In PR the standard is 'messaging control' or just 'messaging.' You don't want the discussion and debate to even be possible, because it is way better for everyone to just agree on the reality of the situation, because there is no outside enforcement of the rules of evidence, it is literally a court of public opinion. Even if it is total nonsense, if it is total nonsense you let people believe that is going to affect your bottom dollar as much as if it was true.
The fact that the VA is now involved is a sign that, if this is fake, its gone far enough that BHVR really would want to step in to control the conversation. Heck, even if it was real generally this would be a situation where you move up an announcement to take control over the conversation.
Burden of proof is a concept of law, not of PR.
Burden of proof is a concept of debate/discussion, which we're having now. If I make a claim, it's on me to provide proof, not for the other person to go looking for it.
-
@xEa said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553848#Comment_2553848
Not everyone wants to play in a SWF with voice. Especially not if you wont gain any bloodpoints.
You don't need to play SWF with voice if you don't want to. The Discord servers are just a way to find people to play with.
-
@MeltingPenguins said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553859#Comment_2553859
small correction: her twitter is not verified. But this type of convo is very easily to fake. And scammers have commonly gone the extra mile to pretend their scam is actually a totally great thing.
That's exactly my point. Hell, I can fake a tweet right now if I so chose. It's not difficult; even if I didn't know how to do it on my end, there are definitely online tools for that.
-
@TAG said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553822#Comment_2553822
Is he? I'm inclined to agree with Orion here. If a claim is being made of X thing being true, it is on the person making the claim to provide the source. That is how burden of proof goes.
Thank you!
-
@shalo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553849#Comment_2553849
Yeah, if you get lucky and get the Legendary NFT you get the DLC thrown in. It say that on the website; "grants in-game access to the Hellraiser chapter of the video game Dead by DaylightTM for PC."
What they're actually saying is "You only get the Chatterer if you buy this", which is a blatantly false claim.
-
@MeltingPenguins said:
going with what Pixel Bush pointed out in his vid on the topic:
No word from her on that topic on her verified twitter, only one accounts that are supposedly her.
So, unless you can link the actual account that is indisputable her and the actual conversation... i'm calling bullshit.
Thank you!
-
@shalo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553835#Comment_2553835
Yes, you get the Chatterer in your NFT if you have the box in your NFT. It's a digital action figure, and it's a digital action figure exlcusive to owners of the NFT box, not sold seperately. Chatter in DBD is not an action figure.
"(...) NFTs that include access to in-game content in the hit video game Dead by Daylight (...)"
-
Definitely not. I enjoy playing on all the realms, even the ones that frustrate me (Coldwind Farm).
People who don't want to play in a series of maps can just go to KYF and exclude maps there. There are Discord servers for finding random people, too.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553819#Comment_2553819
well Orion is too stubborn to believe it so, at least I tried, but at least there's confirmation.
Orion is skeptical of easily faked screenshots, especially since we're literally on the subject of false information and scams, which often use easily faked screenshots and unverifiable claims to pretend to be credible.
There is no confirmation, just claims of confirmation.
-
@shalo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553814#Comment_2553814
They're saying only the people who have the box in their NFT (might be a random chance or you need 50 NFTs to get it or something like that) will get the Chatterer added to their NFT.
"You own the Box, he comes. The Chatterer arrives exclusively to those who own the Box (...)".
-
@MongolPSR said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553820#Comment_2553820
dude im getting frustrated because you are obviously trying to argue me in bad faith. literally not even an hour ago you were saying how people should do their own research, I did a bit more digging and found new news. present it. and now you want me to spoon feed it to you? I feel like no matter how I go about it you will argue me to spite me, or anyone who has concerns about this topic.
Since we're on the subject of false information, I think a little skepticism is appropriate. That means not believing videos showing supposed screenshots of posts (that can be easily faked), not believing screenshots of posts, and only believing the actual posts, on accounts you can actually verify as belonging to the person they're claiming to be.
I can just as easily post a (totally fake) screenshot of a dev on Twitter saying this is false. Would you believe me if I refused to link you to the actual post on Twitter?
-
@MongolPSR said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553810#Comment_2553810
"Im not going to look at possible news sources when I ask for one" fixed it for you. What was that about you needing to do your own research? so maybe do it.
You're the one who made the claim, I'm not going to do your research for you.
-
Not a link to a video showing a purported screenshot of the post nor the screenshot itself, a link to the post.
-
@shalo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553758#Comment_2553758
"since there's a demonstrably false claim right there: that the Chatterer will only be available via the Box of BS." it's a valid claim, you get the Chatterer model in the NFT, you don't get it in DBD by owning the NFT.
The only DBD content is you may get is the DLC, no extra costumes, characters, or voice lines, the voice lines are in the NFT. Some game companies have linked NFTs to in-game content, this arrangement is making no such claim.
They're saying it's "exclusive" to their Box of BS, which is blatantly false.
-
@MongolPSR said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553791#Comment_2553791
I'm still looking if I can just find the direct quotes but this covers the posts
I'm not watching a 6-minute video about a scam I already know is fake, I just want the actual link to the actual Instagram post.
-
@SasukeKun said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553785#Comment_2553785
I hope so, in the Update it sounded like they were even open to giving Michael his largely asked for Stalking music back. They should just have the actor do the voice lines like they did with Ash
It's fake, there is no "hope" or "maybe". They claim that the only way to get the Chatterer is going to be by buying their Box of BS, but you can go to the in-game store right now and purchase it if you want.
-
@MongolPSR said:
As an update its been confirmed by (actor for pinhead) Doug Bradley's wife on Instagram that Doug has done some work with this company and that they were told it was in relation to dead by daylight. They do not know anything more as they are not knowledgeable about videogames or NFT's, all they have confirmed is that Doug did some voice acting work for this NFT company. this is not confirmation that BHVR is working with them. Doug could have been scammed right alongside everyone else. But he did get paid.
Link?
-
@SasukeKun said:
I still don't understand but understand sorta what NFTs are. So if im assuming i might be wrong, even tho BHVR partnered via contract or w/e. The NFT owners got to pull the voice lines? I'm confused
It's fake.
-
@Freudentrauma said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553722#Comment_2553722
The chatterer part only appears on their website, while the egmnow article doesn't have it. That makes it difficult for people for figuring out the information beeing fake than you think. Not everybody will take a close look on the website.
But I'm with you. Normally you don't comment false news/leaks/rumours.Not just Behaviour, I rarely see that happening with other companies as well. The only thing, which might be differently is here, that it might be even more, a scam targeting DbD players. And by my experience in cases like these companies tend to make a vage warning statement.
Still it's the weekend. Stuff takes time. Especially with something like this. The fact this is fake is spreading quite fast as well within the community. And it's still possible that it's only a fake.
How about the fact that they say they're going to implement NFTs with books?
Sorry, but this is just obviously fake.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553762#Comment_2553762
You're twisting my words, I refuted your claim that I was "comparing" and instead said I was trying to help you understand why people would believe this BECAUSE of their past actions, I even listed examples of things they had done which would probably make people more inclined to believe the article immediately.
how does it follow from "their past actions" that this might be even remotely real?
You're continuously missing the point I'm making, I'm saying because of their past actions, it is easily understandable why people might immediately believe this without seeing things rationally.
That's what I already said, though, that people were believing this because it feeds the "BHVR bad" narrative.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553741#Comment_2553741
And even if BHVR were to come out right now and say "this is fake", a lot of those people would still believe it, because it makes BHVR look bad.
To be honest I don't blame them (and this goes back to the whole faith thing) because of their past actions.
While I agree with you that it's fake, I can definitely see why people would have a harder time believing that.
Again, which part of "their past actions" would lend credence to this being real? You already said nothing is comparable to this false claim, so how does it follow from "their past actions" that this might be even remotely real?
-
@dezzmont said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553724#Comment_2553724
Thanks. It helps that I focused way more on the systems side of things, like algorithmic exploitation, data analysis, things like that.
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553691#Comment_2553691
It is 10000000000000% the job of anyone working on pushing an organization's message to quell scams and rumors that may lead to negative brand perception. It is probably the most important function of any outward facing member of an organization to ensure this. You can summarize the entire field of PR and marketing as 'Make sure people are thinking of you in a positive manner that makes them want to support you' and a rumor that you are a Captain Planet Villain certainly is up there in terms of things you should be worried about.
It is literally an entire subfield of communications to deal with this nonsense, crisis communications, and this situation in 2 days of silence already has developed to the point it is starting to see news play with people uncritically reporting on it. Sure, you may not personally be the demographic for Yahoo news, but we are past the point where you can say 'no one is going to believe this.'
I'm not saying nobody will believe this, I'm saying nobody with 1 u of common sense should believe it, since there's a demonstrably false claim right there: that the Chatterer will only be available via the Box of BS.
It'd be like me claiming I work for BHVR and then saying "BHVR" stands for "Bear Hugs [are] Very Rad". It's nonsensical.
@MongolPSR said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553731#Comment_2553731
for quite a few job fields yes, yes it is. its called being on call. If I have clients that are setting me up for a 5 digit cost shoot production. I make myself available. Most content creation fields require to have people on call in case something crazy happens. Bad PR is part of that. it is absolutely the norm in the specific field we are talking about.
My bank had some problems with scammers claiming to be them to get people to give them their info. However, they didn't send out emails until work hours, because that's the norm in my country. They also expected people to have some common sense (which most of them did) and realize that the bank has never communicated with us via text, making it an obvious scam.
I'll chalk this up to cultural differences.
@dezzmont said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553731#Comment_2553731
PR does not get days off. I mean they do, obviously, but if a fire starts you are expected to be available to make a tweet and have a few phone calls even on your vacation.
No well run company has literally no one on hand to handle something like this. At the very least you have someone checking up on your brand every so often on your vacation weekend to ensure that nothing bad is happening who can call top level decision makers.
BHVR isn't some small indy early access company. 600 people work there. Your flagship product having a huge negative rumor start over the weekend that could have extremely bad fallout is not something you just blow off for your island vacation as the a social media manager. You can afford to take 5 minutes out of your day drinking pina coladas to log into twitter and say "This is not happening."
I am not saying 'they shoulda been on this at 2 AM if this broke, but its been 24 hours and, again, this is already starting to hit the news because its such a charged topic. SOMEONE should have said SOMETHING and it is a bad sign no one did.
I don't think it's a bad sign, I think it's a sign that it's the weekend. I also think a lot of people are intentionally claiming the sky is falling because they want BHVR to look bad.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553725#Comment_2553725
none of that is in any way comparable to this NFT BS.
I'm not comparing, I'm trying to help you to understand that because of their past actions (like the ones I listed in that paragraph), it's understandable why people would believe that article immediately; It's hard to have faith in BHVR basically.
I trust them not to pull this BS because it runs contrary to everything I know about them.
Like I said (and you essentially confirmed), "BHVR bad" is probably the main reason why people bought this hook, line, and sinker. And even if BHVR were to come out right now and say "this is fake", a lot of those people would still believe it, because it makes BHVR look bad.
-
@MongolPSR said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553722#Comment_2553722
because its is about BHVR as a company. That's like saying why would celebrities' release statements on false sexual assault rumours. They are under no obligation sure, but I guarantee you its the right move to make. its basic Public Relations when you're a notable company or person. its why they even have different laws on slander and libel because they are considered public entities. They have to play a different game then you and me when it comes to protecting their image.
And I'm sure they'll sue the pants off this entity spreading false information (assuming they're even a "real" entity, and not just a website hosted in some random country where such laws don't apply), when they have a chance to meet with their attorneys during business hours. I still don't think it's on them to dispel every single rumor in the universe that might involve them. Sometimes, people just need to use common sense.
-
@dezzmont said:
Masters in Communications here, with a concentration in professional communications here:
The fact they aren't saying something is a really bad sign. Yes, even though it is a holiday weekend. De-confirming something like this could be done in a twitter post, it wouldn't require a top level choice, this is what you would be paying your day to day content/social media manager to handle and they would need to be in the know of if there were any major brand deals lined up. Content Managers are 'on call' on holidays in the sense they should be checking in every so often to ensure they don't need to put out a fire like this. So the fact they aren't de-confirming it is troubling, because if it isn't true the choice to say 'We aren't doing this' to something generating a ton of negative buzz in your community should take 5 seconds to make.
It either points to serious dysfunction in their leadership structure, where they can't even do the basic "we are not doing this and it goes against our values" post to judo flip this PR snafu into a way to build positive brand perception, or it being real so they CAN'T deconfirm it and either they aren't allowed to say 'yeah we are doing it' due to responsibilities to their partners, or because they are trying to backpedal because they realized their fans are not about making computers do sudoku so hard it makes the planet uninhabitable in 10 years so they can create artificial scarcity of basic gameplay functions.
Weekend=Not working hours
It's not normal to work for a company outside of working hours.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553700#Comment_2553700
Don't pretend that BHVR hasn't made any questionable actions in the past year or so, from locking the RE sets without warning an hour after they released because people were only buying the legs and torso pieces, to a certain developer reacting condescendingly to someone asking about colourblind options (which even that prompted people to react negatively and caused colourblind options to be rushed), to a Binding of Kin's release being completely bugged but gets released regardless of the PTB feedback, to the new HUD that was heavily criticised by PTB feedback but got released anyway without any changes (until a couple of hotfixes later), to console optimisation being ignored for over 2 years (which got worse with the RE patch) and finally addressed after someone dedicates themselves to a thread regarding optimisation which now has over 100 pages and to them basically lying about how the new SBMM system works. But the game continues to get bugs every patch.
Is it any wonder why people might've fallen for this? Seriously, have a good look at BHVR's past actions and tell me you have a hard time understanding why people have fallen for this.
I was here for all those things, you know, but to avoid going off-topic, I'll just say this: none of that is in any way comparable to this NFT BS. They already have the in-game store, why would they waste time and money implementing (or getting someone to implement) this NFT BS?
-
@MongolPSR said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553700#Comment_2553700
why is that on me though? I don't work for BHVR I'm just a consumer just like you. I think my Public Relations Professors would skin me alive like Pinhead if I told them the answer to bad publicity is to do nothing about it and let my consumer base figure out if the claims are true. In my own experience I just saw the headline article multiple times through different news sources said "huh thats weird" and moved on like most people do when mass consuming news.
Why is it on BHVR? I can understand why they'd want to do it, but it's not on them to dispel every obviously fake rumor just because people might believe it. Otherwise, that's all they'd be doing.
Again, five seconds of reading was all it took to discern this is 100% fake. Even if you didn't already know the Chatterer was purchasable via the in-game store, it'd take you maybe a minute to open the in-game store and check.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553682#Comment_2553682
I think the reason a lot of people fell for this is because of BHVR's track record (at least from what I've seen commented) so for them it was hard not to believe it, other than that I agree with you.
What track record? Seriously, explain what, in the past 5 years, would make this make any sense, particularly the obviously false claim that you can only get the Chatterer via the BBS (Box of BS).
@MongolPSR said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553677#Comment_2553677
staying quite over false allegations leads people to believe they are true. I'm not saying they need to say something right this very moment because its the weekend and the devs deserve to have time off with their families. Id rather be kept in the dark then force crunch on a dev staff. that doesn't change that it took the community doing quite a bit of in-depth research to figure out if this had any validity. I saw the nft news on multiple reputable news sites. I didn't even learn about it through dbd twitter or the forums but from a news article.
It took me 5 seconds of reading the image claiming that you could only get the Chatterer via the BBS to discern it was fake. If you want people to know it's fake, just tell them yourself.
EDIT: And let's not forget, even if the devs were to say "no, that's fake", the same people would still believe it, because it makes BHVR look bad, therefore it must be true. I'd be willing to put down money "BHVR bad" is the main reason why people believed this.
-
- It's the weekend.
- Companies are not liable for people falling for scams. Even ethically speaking, do you think it's reasonable to expect anyone to scour the Internet and constantly dispel false claims like this?
- The claim is just obviously fake and I have no idea how anyone could read that and believe it.
- We, regular players, can just as easily spread the word and help each other out.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553677#Comment_2553677
False information that caused uproar all over their socials, I think people are entitled to an explanation.
I disagree, I think people need to be more discerning and less trusting of random sources making absurd (and blatantly false) claims like this.
However, it is the weekend, so maybe they'll address it when they're actually at work, I dunno.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553672#Comment_2553672
tbh I was only asking as I found it funny that they still warn people about breaking forum rules but aren't being transparent about the actual mess here.
What mess? It's all false information.
-
@Nyxis_Fier said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553303#Comment_2553303
I recently started to see the decline to be honest. It's not dead but it is dying.
DbD has never had more players than now, except when the RE chapter dropped.
-
@KerJuice said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2553564#Comment_2553564
Not the least bit surprised. I’m sure they made up their minds to keep it regardless of what the community says. There is a portion of us that do not frequent the forums, but common sense would say they most likely would say “no” if they took the survey. I imagine the devs spent a lot of time and resources into SBMM and they’re not about to throw it all away. It’s unfortunate for us who don’t care for it.
Common sense would say not to assume things like that.
I just hopped into the game and there's a link to the survey right there.
-
This is quite obviously fake. Come on, they literally say that you can only get the Chatterer if you buy their Box of BS, even though we can all go in the game right now and buy the Chatterer.
-
Nurse has a kill rate of ~43% and yet we do not want to buff her, for example.
Speak for yourself. Some of us are crazy.
-
Monstrous Shrine. I saw this thread hours ago and was having trouble remembering the name, that's how forgettable it is.