Well, yeah, PC looks better because the hardware is better. It's well known that games are downgraded when console releases are planned because consoles can't keep up.

in Wow! (PC vs PS4) Comment by Orion February 3, 2019

@BACKSTABBER said:

@Orion said:

@BACKSTABBER said:

@MegChicken said:
Just played a match with a Legion that attacked you twice and would walk around you until you were downed. You can’t counter it, because then they hit you.

Never understood the hate, but after multiple franks mixtapes and this? 0 counterplay, and require 0 skill.

absolutely, legion should be erased, and customers that spent real money on it, compensated

Will you be the one to refund them? There are people who enjoy the Legion.

one thing is enjoying the legion as a killer, other is the ontopic thingy, extremelly un-enjoyable to play against as surv

You still haven't answered my question.

in What the actual hell, Legion is so not fun to play against. Comment by Orion February 3, 2019

@Telli_Fury said:
Did you even read the post or did you just decide to be a smartass and reply to comments?

Yes, I read your OP. You want to remove the only negative point that Sprint Burst has by making it activate on demand (a huge buff), yet are simultaneously pretending that it won't change anything (a lie).

in Making Sprint Burst Strategic Comment by Orion February 3, 2019

@BACKSTABBER said:

@MegChicken said:
Just played a match with a Legion that attacked you twice and would walk around you until you were downed. You can’t counter it, because then they hit you.

Never understood the hate, but after multiple franks mixtapes and this? 0 counterplay, and require 0 skill.

absolutely, legion should be erased, and customers that spent real money on it, compensated

Will you be the one to refund them? There are people who enjoy the Legion.

in What the actual hell, Legion is so not fun to play against. Comment by Orion February 3, 2019

Yes, I do think all killers should be the power role.

in Do you think all killers should be “S-Tier?” Comment by Orion February 3, 2019

@Telli_Fury said:
It would literally do the exact thing it already does, the only difference is it allows you to control it. This is kind of necessary for competitive players, it is in no way broken and it’s still effected by a one time use as usual. Literally nothing is changing.

If nothing is changing, then this isn't necessary.

in Making Sprint Burst Strategic Comment by Orion February 3, 2019

Survivor

Perks

Solo Survivor (not to be confused with Sole Survivor):
Generator repair speed is increased by 5% if there are no other Survivors within a 32-meter radius. Further increase the repair speed by 2% for each dead Survivor.
"I work better alone."

Hyperfocus:
Generator repair speed increases 1% every second you remain on a generator. Great Skill Checks grant an additional 0.5% repair speed. The bonus is reset every time you stop working on a generator.
"I'm in the zone now."

Super Hearing:
Audio cues generate a sonar effect that allows you to see the position of everyone within a 12-meter radius of the trigger event at the moment it happened.
"You shouldn't underestimate my senses."

Killer

Perks

Terrify:
All Survivors' running speeds are decreased by 2% for each one that dies. After each death or sacrifice, all Survivors are affected by Exhaustion for 10 seconds.
"I'll strike the fear of the Entity into their hearts."

Retribution:
Generators damaged by you regress at a rate twice as high as when they were repaired.
"This isn't your playground; it's mine."

Tracker:
Every sound made by Survivors is 100% louder and travels an additional 8 meters.
"I can hear you."

in Make a survivor/killer version of yourself! Comment by Orion February 3, 2019

Because it relies on the survivors screwing up to be of any use, therefore it's balanced. At least that's what I think the devs' reasoning was.

in can somebody answer why infinite tier 3 exists? Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Iceman said:
Maybe counselors from Friday the 13th.

I thought those were called campers.

in Make a survivor/killer version of yourself! Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Tsulan said:

@Orion said:
What's a counselor?

Never seen ST TNG? That mind reading woman, that repeated obvious things?

I've never seen Star Trek, no.

in Make a survivor/killer version of yourself! Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

What's a counselor?

in Make a survivor/killer version of yourself! Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@weirdkid5 said:
Reread the thread. I addressed this in my first post.

You falsely reported a dude a few days ago because you thought he was naming and shaming when he was clearly speaking about himself. Cmon fam, don't do this. Read what people say and pay attention.

In my defense, it's easy to miss one comment among dozens.
As for that other incident, there were people in the thread itself and even the mods who misunderstood the OP. So no, they were not "clearly" speaking about anything.

in Is telling survivor locations to killer bannable? Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Blueberry said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Keene_Kills said:
Damn them for taking away the LOL response.

If you kept a straight face while posting this, you deserve an Oscar nod.

Yeah were basically allowed to do nothing but agree with each other. The PC culture of today at its finest. We can't get a snap shot of the forums opinion on anything now without reading through pages of comments. The Vote Ups are meaningless without a negative option to counter balance.

The problem is that some users were (ab)using bots to make that negative option meaningless by spamming it on everyone whom they didn't like. It has nothing to do with "the PC culture of today".

A small minute fraction of the playerbase that was used as a reason for punishing the entire player base..no that was not a good reason for doing away with it. We've already been through this on another page, drop it, we're not going to agree here.

It wasn't a minute fraction, which the mods have already said.

It WAS a minute fraction, which the mods DID already say.

Regardless of what you believe, the minor inconvenience of having to read comments to know if people agree or disagree is worth the trade-off in helping to keep trolls and bots off the forum.

You are way understating the value of having both agree or disagree options on topics. I think it isn't even remotely close to being worth that trade off. It's also not just an inconvenience of reading comments. Many people will not comment at all because of the added work of posting or that just don't like to post on the forums. You will be getting a much larger and more accurate sample size from an agree or disagree one click option.

Except you won't be, because of the bots making the feature useless with their spam. Even assuming the bots were a minority, when bad behavior goes unpunished, it spreads like cancer. The bot problem would only continue to grow. This way, you get disagreement in a way that is actually conducive to discussion, as opposed to making a single click and providing zero useful feedback.

in It really isn't survivors being toxic its killers. Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Blueberry said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Keene_Kills said:
Damn them for taking away the LOL response.

If you kept a straight face while posting this, you deserve an Oscar nod.

Yeah were basically allowed to do nothing but agree with each other. The PC culture of today at its finest. We can't get a snap shot of the forums opinion on anything now without reading through pages of comments. The Vote Ups are meaningless without a negative option to counter balance.

The problem is that some users were (ab)using bots to make that negative option meaningless by spamming it on everyone whom they didn't like. It has nothing to do with "the PC culture of today".

A small minute fraction of the playerbase that was used as a reason for punishing the entire player base..no that was not a good reason for doing away with it. We've already been through this on another page, drop it, we're not going to agree here.

It wasn't a minute fraction, which the mods have already said.

It WAS a minute fraction, which the mods DID already say.

Regardless of what you believe, the minor inconvenience of having to read comments to know if people agree or disagree is worth the trade-off in helping to keep trolls and bots off the forum.

in It really isn't survivors being toxic its killers. Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@weirdkid5 said:
Scummy? Yes. Bannable? No.

Re-read the OP. The guy added the killer so they could work together. In this case, it's bannable.

in Is telling survivor locations to killer bannable? Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Blueberry said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Keene_Kills said:
Damn them for taking away the LOL response.

If you kept a straight face while posting this, you deserve an Oscar nod.

Yeah were basically allowed to do nothing but agree with each other. The PC culture of today at its finest. We can't get a snap shot of the forums opinion on anything now without reading through pages of comments. The Vote Ups are meaningless without a negative option to counter balance.

The problem is that some users were (ab)using bots to make that negative option meaningless by spamming it on everyone whom they didn't like. It has nothing to do with "the PC culture of today".

A small minute fraction of the playerbase that was used as a reason for punishing the entire player base..no that was not a good reason for doing away with it. We've already been through this on another page, drop it, we're not going to agree here.

It wasn't a minute fraction, which the mods have already said.

in It really isn't survivors being toxic its killers. Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Dead_by_David said:
Thank you for the peice of mind. It is just the way of the game I suppose.

Most people who report don't tell you that they're gonna report you; they just do it. The ones who say it are often just trying to scare you and/or are salty. In the end, if you follow the rules (which are really just common sense), you've got nothing to worry about.

in Reported for holding game hostage Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Yamaoka said:
Most killer mains are quite simply childish. After playing mostly survivor for the event I finally understand toxic SWF teams. They are the result of cheeky killers who ruin the game experience for solo players.

You got cause and effect backwards. Toxic SWF came before toxic killers.

in Why do killers do this when I don’t bm or loop for long? Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@amaru1 said:
@Orion others are responding just fine, just wanted some ideas why from some killers who might get mad at something that I’m missing thanks anyways!

Others are responding based on their own perspectives. For example, in my experience, people who come to forums asking why they were banned or why someone was mean to them in a game almost always know exactly what they did wrong and just want to pretend to be an innocent victim. I'd thus be inclined to react like DocOctober. However, for a more objective view, you'd probably need a recording or something.

in Why do killers do this when I don’t bm or loop for long? Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@fluffybunny said:

@Orion said:

@fluffybunny said:

@Orion said:

@fluffybunny said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Keene_Kills said:
Damn them for taking away the LOL response.

If you kept a straight face while posting this, you deserve an Oscar nod.

Yeah were basically allowed to do nothing but agree with each other. The PC culture of today at its finest. We can't get a snap shot of the forums opinion on anything now without reading through pages of comments. The Vote Ups are meaningless without a negative option to counter balance.

The problem is that some users were (ab)using bots to make that negative option meaningless by spamming it on everyone whom they didn't like. It has nothing to do with "the PC culture of today".

LOL isn't necessarily a negative reaction, but I can understand if they were having troubles with people abusing it and had to do something to address that. I didn't know that was happening.

It was primarily used as a negative reaction, so that distinction became irrelevant. And yeah, it was happening a lot. Some people had their "LOL" count increased by thousands overnight.
The fact that it was being used as a negative reaction wasn't the problem in and of itself, despite what some may claim; it was the abuse and the bots.

Did they do that to you, too?

Indeed. It was to be expected, given my high post count.

I think I was still pretty new to the forums when LOL was a thing. I only got a couple and I had seen it being used for funny stuff, too, so I just assumed it had multiple uses.

And it did, but those users who chose to abuse the feature by using bots ruined it for everyone else.

in It really isn't survivors being toxic its killers. Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

Without knowing all the details and actually seeing the trial from both perspectives, this can't be answered in any serious capacity.

in Why do killers do this when I don’t bm or loop for long? Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@fluffybunny said:

@Orion said:

@fluffybunny said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Keene_Kills said:
Damn them for taking away the LOL response.

If you kept a straight face while posting this, you deserve an Oscar nod.

Yeah were basically allowed to do nothing but agree with each other. The PC culture of today at its finest. We can't get a snap shot of the forums opinion on anything now without reading through pages of comments. The Vote Ups are meaningless without a negative option to counter balance.

The problem is that some users were (ab)using bots to make that negative option meaningless by spamming it on everyone whom they didn't like. It has nothing to do with "the PC culture of today".

LOL isn't necessarily a negative reaction, but I can understand if they were having troubles with people abusing it and had to do something to address that. I didn't know that was happening.

It was primarily used as a negative reaction, so that distinction became irrelevant. And yeah, it was happening a lot. Some people had their "LOL" count increased by thousands overnight.
The fact that it was being used as a negative reaction wasn't the problem in and of itself, despite what some may claim; it was the abuse and the bots.

Did they do that to you, too?

Indeed. It was to be expected, given my high post count.

in It really isn't survivors being toxic its killers. Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@fluffybunny said:

@Orion said:

@Blueberry said:

@Keene_Kills said:
Damn them for taking away the LOL response.

If you kept a straight face while posting this, you deserve an Oscar nod.

Yeah were basically allowed to do nothing but agree with each other. The PC culture of today at its finest. We can't get a snap shot of the forums opinion on anything now without reading through pages of comments. The Vote Ups are meaningless without a negative option to counter balance.

The problem is that some users were (ab)using bots to make that negative option meaningless by spamming it on everyone whom they didn't like. It has nothing to do with "the PC culture of today".

LOL isn't necessarily a negative reaction, but I can understand if they were having troubles with people abusing it and had to do something to address that. I didn't know that was happening.

It was primarily used as a negative reaction, so that distinction became irrelevant. And yeah, it was happening a lot. Some people had their "LOL" count increased by thousands overnight.
The fact that it was being used as a negative reaction wasn't the problem in and of itself, despite what some may claim; it was the abuse and the bots.

in It really isn't survivors being toxic its killers. Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

False reports are ignored. I wouldn't worry.

in Reported for holding game hostage Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Blueberry said:

@Keene_Kills said:
Damn them for taking away the LOL response.

If you kept a straight face while posting this, you deserve an Oscar nod.

Yeah were basically allowed to do nothing but agree with each other. The PC culture of today at its finest. We can't get a snap shot of the forums opinion on anything now without reading through pages of comments. The Vote Ups are meaningless without a negative option to counter balance.

The problem is that some users were (ab)using bots to make that negative option meaningless by spamming it on everyone whom they didn't like. It has nothing to do with "the PC culture of today".

in It really isn't survivors being toxic its killers. Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

I wouldn't worry. False reports go in the trash, where they belong.

in Getting falsely accused of speed hacking? Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@TangledNoodles said:

@AlwaysInAGoodShape said:
Really backwards for punishing a survivor to play towards their win-condition imo.

Only game-throwers should be reported.

So if someone animation canceled you to stage 2 or till you die they shouldn't be reported?

According to the rules and common sense, yes, they should be.

in Survivors working with killers Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

Yes, it's bannable.

in Is telling survivor locations to killer bannable? Comment by Orion February 2, 2019

@Attackfrog said:

@Orion said:

@Attackfrog said:

@Orion said:

@Attackfrog said:

@Meme said:
*Got face camped........which is funny because the huntress hooked other survivors but they didn't get the special treatment.I already stress enough with what's going on in my life,and I can't believe that even while playing a video game I still get stressed out.

play warframe. It's super fun

Is it less grindy now?

It is probably more grindy than ever, but I don't mind it. The gameplay is still super fun for me.

Has the gameplay changed in any significant way?

Not really, run n gun, parkour, different frames/weapons build for different things (crit/status/etc).

I have just always enjoyed it and haven't taken a significant break from it since I started a few years ago. It's my go-to shooter and even in grouping, there is almost no salt or harassment. In fact, I have had too many fun groups to count over the years, whereas in DbD I have had far too many negative interactions.

My experience in Warframe is the opposite. People who're pissed you don't magically know everything or have all the best equipment from the start. And while the gameplay is fun, it got boring very quickly due to the grind - I just wasn't getting anywhere despite putting in many, many hours into it.

in After 2 hours I finally got a lobby but....... Comment by Orion February 1, 2019

Griefing does not require a customer support ticket. See here: https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/19450/game-rules-and-report-system
And yes, the in-game report does work.

in Survivors working with killers Comment by Orion February 1, 2019

@Attackfrog said:

@Orion said:

@Attackfrog said:

@Meme said:
*Got face camped........which is funny because the huntress hooked other survivors but they didn't get the special treatment.I already stress enough with what's going on in my life,and I can't believe that even while playing a video game I still get stressed out.

play warframe. It's super fun

Is it less grindy now?

It is probably more grindy than ever, but I don't mind it. The gameplay is still super fun for me.

Has the gameplay changed in any significant way?

in After 2 hours I finally got a lobby but....... Comment by Orion February 1, 2019

@Broosmeister said:
You don't play on PS4? Literally at least 80% of the killers here camp & tunnel without it being needed. Console killers are sweaty toxic try hards with 0 skill

So they use strategies you don't like. Do you think that justifies the death threats, telling people to commit suicide, racist and homophobic slurs, actively trying to ruin reputations and getting people banned?