Paddy4583
Paddy4583
About
- Username
- Paddy4583
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
She was quite capable of keeping her work life and streaming life separate. She’ loves the attention.JammyJewels said:
That... Maybe I was just on a high of dopamine when I read it. But you're right... It's not sympathetic. Do you think she was pissed at people for interrupting her streams with work related questions?ZombieGenesis said:@JammyJewels said:
I think @not_Queen deserves flags, a buffet, a standing ovation... And a medal. Especially after shutting down the "PS4 Compensation" thread down like a BEAST OF PREYYou and I read that two very different ways.
All I read was an arrogant mod completely dismissing the opinions and feelings of 1/3rd of their playerbase. To be fair, I don't think compensation was warranted but maybe some actual empathy for those who have been waiting for this patch? Nope? Can't get that? Just a snarky comment as they close a thread? Okay. Tells me all I need to know I guess.
she’d have no life in her stream if she didn’t use her job as bait -
You can’t mori a PC player they DC before you get the chanceKING_DEDE said:
And that’s where you are wrong we aren’t poor we just simply choose a console pcLowbei said:These console peasants are getting rowdy.
Stop whining or get a job and buy a computer
like a normal person.
Hex Pc Master Race: Drawing on its power of pc players each time a pc player tries to call everyone else ######### you gain a token
3 tokens: 5% movement speed bonus
4 tokens: all pc players auras are revealed to you
5 tokens: grants the ability to Mori pc players -
Isn’t this game for 18+
because im seeing a lot of babies 👶 in here -
Why would Sony put something on their servers if it’s not stable and doesn’t meet requirements?SPaefgen said:We’re waiting for 4 weeks now. This isn’t fair anymore. Every morning, every hour I’m looking at the forum and their twitter page. No update. It’s hilarious that Sony is too dumb to bring this update. They lost me and many other players, playing this game so far
How are people this desperate for a bloody clown?
who cares, half of the people whining haven’t even bought the DLC that’s out now so what is the difference!!! -
Aww can’t you grind your perks, need the shrine so you awww?Vortexas said:@popoles said:
And why are you (OP) so salty? Why can't everybody be treated equally? The fact that they bought a different machine to play this game on isn't making them a worse customer or player.Sure we can all be equals.
As soon as they update to a PC and stop shoveling money into PS and Xbox #########-show machines.
-
I’m grey and this offends meAshleyWB said:Careful with how you phrase stuff, Race and skin colour is one of those things which may offend. Best to avoid talking in too much depth these topics. I get the point you're making but again...bit of a grey area. -
Haha sabotaging hooks to 99 and then dropping them as the killer is about to hook is one of my pastimes. Especially when they have had to put up a really good chase to get the down. I deserve the camp when caught.
I know I have my own things I do as a killer too.
If someone doesn’t ready up before the timer readys us them up, i’ll ignore every survivor till I find them and tunnel them all game and they get proxy camped and tunnelled again, if your not ready to play keep out the lobby haha
-
Yeah every time I see camping they always get either a 3-4 k because survivors don’t know when to stop going for the rescue, so you have one on the hook 2 getting downed around it and 1 doing gens, that’s an easy win and if it worked for me I’d do it too
-
Ueah once 2 have DCed and the killer still plays like they have 4 survivors doing 5 gens there’s no point in staying in the game, you don’t stand a chance to get points worth hanging around for
-
Not buying something they have made play to pay is not going to effect their bottom line at all.
Mid 20k people on this forum didn’t but cells that’s less than 1% of their player base, more than that will already be accounted for as players who’ll play for content... o one gives you something for free if they are concerned about the bottom line. -
Can’t stand either of them they are loud obnoxious 💩 bit at least they admit it.SaltyKiller said:@Paddy4583 said:
RemoveSWF said:Yeah, devs give toxic players custom cosmetics.
Right, AngryPug?
Judging by the way you are on the forum I’d say your probably a toxic player too
Found the AngryPug and Ochido fan.
-
I’m going to make a post about decency and than proceed to make comments such as this.Do not dare ever again assume how a game went if you weren't taking part it.
whats more amusing is you watched all this going down and still headed towards her..... and were shocked by the outcome -
BS I only ever see camping after rank 10 on PS4 most in full P3 gear too.Soren said:Huge camp / tunnel usually happens at low ranks against new killers that feel insecure about their skills.
OP: what is your rank?
They shouldn’t remove SWF but they should make it so that the killers can choose to take part in a SWF match -
Lol
yet original artist! His origninal
is just edited images that he doesn’t own what they’ve done is exactly what he’s done.
im pretty sure You don’t need permission to use your own licenced characters, however he does need permission if he’s making money from it as this would be copyright infringement on his part -
Judging by the way you are on the forum I’d say your probably a toxic player tooRemoveSWF said:Yeah, devs give toxic players custom cosmetics.
Right, AngryPug?
-
No FIX required it’s not broken.
Stop going on about camping it’s not even a problem unless your a poor and or
salty survivor. -
We get it you don’t like Marth88 or Tyde And your a cool rebel going against the crowd but, that tournament was aRemoveSWF said:TydeTyme is an unqualified egomaniac whose tournaments have much worse rules than the one tonight.
I congratulate everybody on this successful tournament and extend well-wishes to our new DbD champions Tournament Monsters.
######### show start to finish, it should be redone, the hosting and general facilitating was horrendous.
there was no joy in that win for them at all, TM were robbed of a win by the stupid hosts, they didn’t understand their rules, I watched the full 12.5 hours and the hatch thing was constantly changing and confusing players.
-
Maybe if you want a definitive answer you should define what your asking.Raccoon said:The in-game descriptions under the reportable offenses do not reflect what the devs have previously listed in prior threads at all.
I'm sure someone that knows will come in with a definite yes/no answer....someday....somehow.
is it reporatable Yes definitely answered several times. -
So I have found every dictionary to define the word as meaning rude. And the first search that came up arguing this definition was mumsnet so I think that makes you a meme.Jack11803 said:@MrsMaliciousX said:
@Jack11803 said:
@MrsMaliciousX said:
They said in a couple weeks. Hopefully this week or next week will have it. Ignore these ignorant people.It’s ignorant to call them ignorant because ignorant is to not know something, and they know they simply give the route give the answer and you call them ignorant which is ignorant because that’s not the right word to use.
Was that message disgusting enough to read?
yep if you're using it as an adjective way...which i CLEARLY was not..and you even knew that..lol
Give me a picture of the dictionary excerpt. Willingful ignorance on my part is overpowered and should be nerfed
-
Yes it is.Raccoon said:@Neska said:
Raccoon said:What part of my question inferred that I wanted to report someone?
what part of it stated otherwise? but I guess you’re right, you didn’t say that.. maybe it’s because everyone wants to report everyone these days that we jump on these kind of conclusions, but you could’ve wrote the question with a bit more detail there, then other people would’ve known what you really wanted to know without further asking
Can you tell me if it is a reportable offense?
its one of the definitions in the reporting section I think it’s under trolling! -
Your still wrong. It was clear in the context which definition they were using, you then go on to say the other definition is incorrect which it is not. The English dictionary defines the word as meaning lack of knowledge in the way you were using it andJack11803 said:@Paddy4583 said:
Jack11803 said:@Paddy4583 said:
Jack11803 said:
@MrsMaliciousX said: They said in a couple weeks. Hopefully this week or next week will have it. Ignore these ignorant people. It’s ignorant to call them ignorant because ignorant is to not know something, and they know they simply give the route give the answer and you call them ignorant which is ignorant because that’s not the right word to use. Was that message disgusting enough to read?
Actually in context it was being used as meaning discourteous or rude, which is exactly what they were so the word was used correctly
That’s actually not a true definition, just one the US used in their culture. Ignorant, truly only has 1 meaning. Now you are less ignorant about the word. The word isn’t a negative thing like people think, more like a student searching for answers. Isn’t culture weird?
Only thing strange is how you say culture but then dismis one in an attempt to prove your argument which is still wrong!
I was referring to aforementioned. Although I could’ve of worded it a bit better. Just look up a dictionary.
discourteous or rude in the way they were using it.
What point are you trying to prove here? -
Only thing strange is how you say culture but then dismis one in an attempt to prove your argument which is still wrong!Jack11803 said:@Paddy4583 said:
Jack11803 said:@MrsMaliciousX said:
They said in a couple weeks. Hopefully this week or next week will have it. Ignore these ignorant people.
It’s ignorant to call them ignorant because ignorant is to not know something, and they know they simply give the route give the answer and you call them ignorant which is ignorant because that’s not the right word to use.
Was that message disgusting enough to read?
Actually in context it was being used as meaning discourteous or rude, which is exactly what they were so the word was used correctly
That’s actually not a true definition, just one the US used in their culture. Ignorant, truly only has 1 meaning. Now you are less ignorant about the word. The word isn’t a negative thing like people think, more like a student searching for answers. Isn’t culture weird?
-
I understand it’s a cry. I want to win they want to escape wha wha wha, hatch stand off means you’ve lost if you want to waste your time do so but don’t blame the survivors, bet they found the hatch because you camped it first.swenpai said:@LatexT said:
Do you want to waste years of your life looking at him in the eyes with no chance of killing him, or to let him leave, get your points, and go to the next match?
You do not understand the point of the thread.
best bet is to fake a hatch camp and wait for them to show up and boom there some -
Actually in context it was being used as meaningJack11803 said:@MrsMaliciousX said:
They said in a couple weeks. Hopefully this week or next week will have it. Ignore these ignorant people.It’s ignorant to call them ignorant because ignorant is to not know something, and they know they simply give the route give the answer and you call them ignorant which is ignorant because that’s not the right word to use.
Was that message disgusting enough to read?
discourteous or rude, which is exactly what they were so the word was used correctly -
It’s a fundamental right to stop playing a game as and when you want, who cares if they DC, a few lost BPs and addons big deal
-
Except they didn’t and it’s still not a reason for anyone to just DC so the killer doesn’t have to wait on the hatch to give the location away for the survivor.RSB said:@Paddy4583 said:
Or you could just let them have the hatch.
why should they DC for you?Because they lost, not him. They are weak (even when playing the easy mode aka survivor) not him.
easy mode... killers have no game without survivors and survivors have no game without killer.
its only easy if the killer is not as good as the survivor and vice versa -
Pssst there are 4 category’s
-
That’s my point.DocOctober said:@Paddy4583 said:
Or you could just let them have the hatch.
why should they DC for you?That is a redundant argument as it'll just lead to "why should I let them go?".
why should they DC because you feel the need to hatch camp and wait, you realise most of the time it’s the killer that gives the hatch location away by camping it.
your argument is just as valid -
Or you could just let them have the hatch.
why should they DC for you? -
Probably get camped because your a toxic player at rank 20mydady787 said:playing dead by daylight on ps4 became painful for me. I face a huge amount of campers daily. is possible one day for devs to remove the ability of the killer to camp. it just makes the game more boring and useless to play.
-
How is that hypocritical? Saying you don’t like DCing and then DCing yourself is hypocritical but but not this??Slapped_A_T_Rex said:@weirdkid5 said:
Yeah if the Killer on PS4 kills his internet it sends everyone back to the main menu without going to the result screen. Pretty sure you lose everything from the match progress and all. A lot of Killers are doing it Rank 16 and higher.@Clyde this needs to be looked at. Killers are doing this on purpose on console.
So you dont like DCers but you dont mind campers. interestingly hypocritical there dont you think.
-
Entitled people in life expect it everywhereWell_Placed_HexTotem said:I had a game recently on the corn fields where a guy was hooked, I was chasing the last person down, and he Kobe’d off. They had only a smidgen of one gen left to do, so before I could even pick the person up I’d downed, he completed it, and got Adrenaline to get back to fully healed.
So instead of picking the person up, I went towards the gen that popped. I eventually caught him, downed him, and hooked him again. They all died, 4 player SWF, and after the match they invite me to an XBL party and proceed to ######### on me for not “respecting the 4%”.
Depending on how a game is going, if I see someone 4%, I might not chase them. But to what end are you supposed to reward survivors for being lucky? He didn’t get tunneled, he even got back to full health. Am I supposed to let him heal and escape?
I’ve played over 1,000 hours, mostly killer, and there are a lot of just plain stupid unwritten rules survivors have, but this one is the most bizarre to me. -
What? You couldn’t look at a gen all game, the whole point of the 3rd person is to give the survivor the advantage of escape. Staring at a hen and stopping every few seconds to spin round would be boring, it would do more damage than good. It would be a waste of time and money no one would use itFurioSmasher said:Hi, I feel that playing survivor does not bring in the scare factor anymore like it did when I have first started playing it. Instead, many people are willing to play survivor because it is easier to play it compared to killers. However, if we were to change the survivor's perspective from 3rd person to 1st person, not only do we have to keep watch of the killer most of the time, it will also increase the scare factor which I feel will increase the enjoyment of this game as survivor. Furthermore, it will give killers a chance to sneak up on them and give them an advantage. Although this might not be possible, at least there should be something done to increase the scare factor in survivors.
-
id Prefer a survivor % based play on gens.
so when 4 survivors are on the map they can only progress a gen to 25% so all four survivors would need to progress a gen 25% before it completes.
This should be the same for HEX totems too -
Most killers I see camping only do it because of toxic survivorsSpectre_UK said:Doesn't change the fact camping is a poor aspect of the game and a bad way to play killer they punished Survivors for Hook farming and I think this should be placed in the same mind set as that killer are supposed to patrol gens and chase survivors not sit by a hook and play jenga
flashlights, looping, DS, POV abuse, etc etc
surviving isn’t hard and unless your being camped by billy or leather face good survivors working together can get out of the situation -
There are specific perks that encourage the killer to tunnel too, making hens take longer should be implemented but it won’t discourage tunneling
-
Neither am INos37 said:@Paddy4583 said:
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a 4K with the docI'm not talking about SWF at Rank 1
-
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a 4K with the docNos37 said:I'll just take Sadonic's advice, and play the Doctor for easy wins all day until they nerf him.
-
The object is too kill all survivors
why would a killer go for someone who’s at full health over the one who’s down at next hit.
tunneling isn’t just driven by the speed of generator popping it’s a strong strategy, survivors come running to get that hook save and makes the killers job far easier.
making generators longer to fix I agree with in general but faster at less survivors will just introduce more ways for the killer to prolong the game by slugging and a single survivor will always go for the hatch even at a 20 second gen pop because it’s the safest option.