MichaelAMyers
MichaelAMyers
About
- Username
- MichaelAMyers
- Joined
- Visits
- 181
- Last Active
Comments
-
@KillermainBTWm8 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/582332#Comment_582332
It was abused instead of being a way to say "I disagree" it turned into "I don't like you so have a downvote" Also people would use it instead of actually discussing.
Why are humans so petty....like damn.
-
Wait what? They removed something opinionated???
Why was it removed???
-
@GodDamn_Angela said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/579673#Comment_579673
Oh man. I don't even know how to respond to this.
Agreed Angela.
-
@ASpazNamedSteve said:
Yeah it's pretty dumb.
Like sure it's only a weak recolour, but did they really not consider the fact that it gets 100% covered up by his hand?
Sums it all up for my response here.
-
@JawsIsTheNextKiller said:
I'm enjoying it so far. I'm so glad it isn't a comedy like the movies were.
Wasnt that the main point? It was to make parody of the horror movie genre.
-
@Shaped said:
Horrible in my opinion. I couldn't go past few episodes, there are better tv shows to watch.
I like the concept but not the execution.
-
@Theluckyboi said:
Just picture the people insulting you like someone who looks like this, tends to work
Ouch
-
Lets not.
-
@CallMeBacon said:
The Devs can't get too close to the original Ghostface design from Scream, as that can bring legal issues to the game. They have the license for the mask, not that complete outfit or character.
This right here!
-
See as a Michael Mainer yeah its time the oldest licensed killer deserving some REAL cosmestics.
-
Yes its confirmed.
-
@chococri said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
The Shape: 21 Years old (Taken from Halloween 1)
The Nurse: Likely in her 30s
The Trapper: Likely 30s
The Wraith: Likely 40s
The HillBilly: Likely 40s
The Doctor: Likely 30s
The Hag: Likely 40's
The Cannibal: He is about 24-26 years old
The Pig: 33 years old (Taken from Saw 1)
The Nightmare: Mid 30 years
The Clown: Def in his 40s
The Spirit: About 17 or 18 years old
The Huntress: Given by her lore she is about in her late 20s early 30sI am mostly going by somewhat of their time periods/appearance.
Looking at his model in game (Myers) that made me laugh because It's reminds me of Jotaro which is 17 yet he looks like this:
BOI
-
I don't believe they are.
-
He needs some malk.
-
@Wahara said:
Because if I didn't step in this entire topic would have been nothing but different people trading blows against legend, as well as a complete circle jerk between people convinced that the addition of LGBTQ characters is silly, unnecessary, etc.When one or two people are attempting to engage multiple people, simultaneously, on a topic that is emotionally provocative, replies will appear with frequency. I hope this answers your question.
Speaking as someone with far less intelligence, I just wanted to let you know that commas are your friend.
Because.....
1.it is silly and unnecessary as many factual points here.
2. Legend did this against himself not us.
3. No one is emotionally invested into this just you two.
4. Bringing up commas on a forum=/=A show of intelligence yup proved my point about you. -
Child Predator Argument
VHS Porn Tape ArgumentOh boy I can't wait for this guy to believe he is so right.
-
The Shape: 21 Years old (Taken from Halloween 1)
The Nurse: Likely in her 30s
The Trapper: Likely 30s
The Wraith: Likely 40s
The HillBilly: Likely 40s
The Doctor: Likely 30s
The Hag: Likely 40's
The Cannibal: He is about 24-26 years old
The Pig: 33 years old (Taken from Saw 1)
The Nightmare: Mid 30 years
The Clown: Def in his 40s
The Spirit: About 17 or 18 years old
The Huntress: Given by her lore she is about in her late 20s early 30sI am mostly going by somewhat of their time periods/appearance.
-
I wouldn't say most powerful forms just changes their physical appearances but overall yeah it seems "The Entity" is a physical being and not some abstract or non-physical entity.....so basically if it can be sick these indicate it can surely die.
-
@Jack11803 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@Jack11803 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@powerbats said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
well im just going to ignore you since ijust noticed you only have a total of 64 posts which says alot
@Wahara only has 101 most in this thread, I've got well 2.9k, other are in between, does that make my position stronger than yours which has only 885 posts?
Inb4 Wahara backtracks and makes himself look like a jester since he wanna call people cheerleaders.
They didnt make that comment. The OP did
What's the difference between them? I see none tbh since both are trying to use the same arguments for something that makes no sense whatsoever.
I ship it. Without a lore change of course
So you ship two walls? LOL.
-
@Jack11803 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@powerbats said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
well im just going to ignore you since ijust noticed you only have a total of 64 posts which says alot
@Wahara only has 101 most in this thread, I've got well 2.9k, other are in between, does that make my position stronger than yours which has only 885 posts?
Inb4 Wahara backtracks and makes himself look like a jester since he wanna call people cheerleaders.
They didnt make that comment. The OP did
What's the difference between them? I see none tbh since both are trying to use the same arguments for something that makes no sense whatsoever.
Plus anyone who goes by Post counts is likely people who can't comprehend both logic and understanding since my posts to "Dylan" (who I see now is basically Wahara) aren't capable of using comprehension but want to believe they are so right that they are wrong and won't ever accept it and as anyone here who argued with both can see they want to twist things around to suit their ego of always wanting to be right.
-
@powerbats said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
well im just going to ignore you since ijust noticed you only have a total of 64 posts which says alot
@Wahara only has 101 most in this thread, I've got well 2.9k, other are in between, does that make my position stronger than yours which has only 885 posts?
Inb4 Wahara backtracks and makes himself look like a jester since he wanna call people cheerleaders.
-
@Wahara said:
Ignoring MichaelMyers would make this conversation much healthier. He's reduced himself to the role of cheerleader at this point and regardless of whether you think LGBTQ characters should be included or not, you have to admit that's really unhelpful to the discussion.This is how you lose arguments people lol this "Child" calls people a cheerleader because we aren't on his little side and he believes this conversation was ever healthy (when it hasn't for maaaany given pages.)
Whats unhelpful is your lack of reading comprehension skills when people have brought up not just valid but reasonable given debates where you literally have been shown to lack any logical refutes or arguments where me and others here have actually brought up something factual as you ignore me which im happy because I don't discuss or associate myself with ignorance but just then you try to call me a cheerleader because I agree with people on a far superior intelligence than yours? yet you are on Dylan's side acting as a support cheerleader because so many even LGBT/Non-LGBT is against you both isn't just sad but hypocritical.
Now you can excuse yourself from this discussion since you want others too because you proving this ######### to be toxic and off-topic I haven't mentioned you in any negative light of any kind and I won't tolerate some ignorant kid to try to belittle me because Im not on their little side when clearly they are in the wrong.
-
@ShrimpTwiggs said:
@Wahara said:
Those are some dense paragraphs, Shrimp. I'll wait a little bit to actually try dissecting all of that, because the thoughts expressed appear a bit disjointed to me and I'm not sure how I'm going to structure my response without it looking really disorganized.Though, I will say on the subject of arrogance, you were the one who misrepresented what I said and used it as a basis for accusing me of arrogance, so I showed you what real arrogance looks like. For what it's worth, for you in particular, I will return to base line. Your post appears to contain what seems like back pedaling, but I can genuinely see that you are trying, and see no indication that you're being intentionally obtuse. (Which is what triggers the ever living [BAD WORD] out of me) I see no reason to punish you for that. The tone is sincere. That's not to guarantee anyone else is safe from me turning the ######### switch back on. I will bring it right back up to ten once I start noticing weasel tactics.
A full response will be given tonight or tomorrow. I'm not sure yet.
You can say that I'm arrogant if you want, but I'm not the one trying to speak for a whole group of people. To make things more organized, I'll shorten my points.
1.) You said that it's harder for gay people to imagine these character's as gay compared to straight people. You don't speak for everyone.
2.) This is a visual game. Therefore, that's the median the devs chose to include more groups of people. It's more convenient that way, because this is a visual game. The lore isn't necessary, therefor, less time will be dedicated to it and the devs will drop unnecessary pieces. Sexuality isn't something that can be seen visually, so it's less likely to be put in the game. If this game were a dating simulator, that information would be more relevant.
3.) When I repeated what you said in my other post, it wasn't with the intent of being rude. It was to clarify the points I was addressing.
4.) My point of addressing race and gender compared to sexuality still stands. None of the characters in DBD are confirmed straight, so there's no exclusion. If you see them as straight, that's on you.
5.) The devs could very well not have included sexuality because they didn't want to. If they don't want to confirm that, they shouldn't be pressured to do so. And what if someone who is gay was trying to relate to a character that was confirmed straight? Wouldn't that make the problem worse?
At the end of the day, this isn't your work. If the devs don't want to confirm a character's preferences, they don't have to. It's not a big issue if there's no answer to a character's sexuality.
This ended the discussion by far.
-
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i am asking for them to confirm any of them being LGBTQ+ (not just gay) so is it that hard for them to answer the question. and it does matter because i would want to be able to relate to a character more and since nea is rebelous thats why i play her because i love her story.
- So you want confirmation over something that is trivial?
- It's not hard for them to answer they just dont care.
- If you want Nea to be gay then think it while you play just don't be trying to demand or ask for them to confirm something that doesn't really matter at all even other LGBTQ here don't care for this stuff.
- how is it trivial if its something that exists.
- didnt know know you worked on the dev team and know everyone thier individually
- i never said Nea i said someone. and it does matter when you say it doesnt with no facts.
- By definition of Trivial "of little value or importance." so yes it's trivial and something that only exists for your bias.
- Trust me I do and even then you being a child and dismissing everyone who disagrees is the reason why they don't care.
- LMAO! the facts is no one is really caring my dude stick to OBVIOUS fanfic and your imagination we in the horror community dont care for this trivial non-sense this is a HORROR VIDEO GAME not a DATING SIM and you also have absolute 0 facts vs the many who brought more argument you cant even refute.
-
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i am asking for them to confirm any of them being LGBTQ+ (not just gay) so is it that hard for them to answer the question. and it does matter because i would want to be able to relate to a character more and since nea is rebelous thats why i play her because i love her story.
- So you want confirmation over something that is trivial?
- It's not hard for them to answer they just dont care.
- If you want Nea to be gay then think it while you play just don't be trying to demand or ask for them to confirm something that doesn't really matter at all even other LGBTQ here don't care for this stuff.
-
@ShrimpTwiggs said:
@Wahara said:
Fair, you're more than free to embarrass yourself by indicating you haven't bothered to follow the conversation properly before spewing your opinion.You're entitled to that and nobody can take it away from you.
When I warned the gloves are off, I meant it. Nobody gets wiggle room anymore. Nobody gets to run away from a point. No distractions, no red herrings, no BS. You will be a faithful and honest participant in the discussion or I will go out of my way to make you look like an idiot, and I'll succeed.
You're going to ask me to "show myself out" on a public forum and claim that I'm the one embarrassing myself? And I read the post. It doesn't change much.
Your comparison of gender and race to sexuality holds little ground. If you made all the characters explicitly white men, that directly excludes others. Whereas none of the character's sexualities are confirmed in DBD, therefor no one is excluded. It's just not confirmed. If all the characters were confirmed as heterosexual, you comparison would make more sense. We would have a reason to ask why some of the characters aren't gay. But, since some of the characters could very well be gay, they aren't excluded. The comparison falls flat.
"Why should I have to play pretend?"
Both sides do, because nothing is confirmed.The characters can be either gay or straight.
"It's like people are saying heterosexuality isn't naturally assumed to be the default or something."
This is a you issue. A lot of people have no issue imagining some of the characters as gay. You even stated it in your own words. "Assumed." You can assume the characters are gay all you want, just as someone else can assume they're not. No one is right or wrong. Nothing is explicitly confirmed.
"Why is race and gender okay to portray but sexuality isn't?"
No one said it wasn't okay, but race and gender are much easier to show visually without having to include it in a bio. Since the characters have to be visual in this game, it's easy to include people in this way. I personally think it's better that the characters sexuality is left to the audience's imagination. Makes it seem like their ships and fics hold more weight. Again, if you want the character's sexualities to be shown visually, I doubt it'll be received well. At the end, it's the dev's choice.There are some things I can agree with. I think saying it's not necessary isn't a good argument. Because at the end of the day, no lore in this game is necessary. But that only makes this post all the more ridiculous, because it's essentially an argument over things that don't matter.
I can also agree that representation is a good thing. However, that doesn't mean we should pressure the devs into including it, nor does it make it explicitly necessary in DBD.
Now do us both a favor and drop this attitude you've got going on. You want representation and acceptance, yet your first reaction to my opinion was to "show myself out." You're a complete hypocrite.
The ######### savagery is uncanny and I love it lmao these guys won't comprehend basic arguments and refutes to the fact they trying to force something that isn't really a 100% relevance.
-
He still going on?
-
@Aari_Piggy66 said:
Who cares about their sexuality or about slapping a lgbt-whatever character, it's pointless and stupid.If you want to see some random ass lgbt rubbish, look up rule 34 dead by daylight.
I'm sure you can find Dwight blowing David or some ######### like that.@ToolboxMotley said:
Uh oh, my post needs approval before it'll go through, now. Is it time to be jailed for wrongthink?This is all that needs to be summed up can a Mod lock this thread now?
-
Nope, not bannable.
-
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
its not just about a video game its all LGBTQ+ people in general that arent accepted for being who they are and by adding LGBTQ+ people to videogames it would be another step to normalizing LGBTQ+ which is one very small step by adding one to this gameWHAT? JUST WHAT? literally, people been telling you it's not important because this is a video game! a HORROR VIDEO GAME! Being Gay or Lesbian or Transgender is openly free right now in 2018 ACCEPTABLE and been ACCEPTABLE for a long time! but who cares over a VIDEO GAME!
its not fully acceptaed if you would of refered to my whole post then you would of saw that in places like Florida people fire others for being LGBTQ+ and that although we are tollerated we arent acceptated since their are still people who beat up LGBTQ+ in public at nightime in alleys or other places we arent accepted and we dont have every right of a strait person. and yes this is a videogame and most other videogames dont contain LGBTQ+ people. in Overwatch the character tracer is gay but you dont see them announcing that in the game except in a few sprays. it just that i would like to relate to a gay character and just because this is a videogame does not mean it cant be added.
Overwatch=/=Dead by Daylight
-
@BMAN said:
I'm down for lore and learning lots about the survivors and killers, not sure knowing sexual orientation is necessary though. I'm more interested in how they survive in the entity's world and if they could ever get out.FACTS!
-
@Wahara said:
I'm gay. The whole numbers game isn't really a valid basis for any argument anyways. It is interesting to note that several people who are LGBT aren't really as against the idea as they appear to be, once you pick away through the nonsense like "it's not needed" and such, they're concern ultimately boils down to a deep cynicism.I understand it, but like I said, it's a bit sad and defeatist.
No just stop they said their thoughts and you cant twist it around.
-
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
its not just about a video game its all LGBTQ+ people in general that arent accepted for being who they are and by adding LGBTQ+ people to videogames it would be another step to normalizing LGBTQ+ which is one very small step by adding one to this gameWHAT? JUST WHAT? literally, people been telling you it's not important because this is a video game! a HORROR VIDEO GAME! Being Gay or Lesbian or Transgender is openly free right now in 2018 ACCEPTABLE and been ACCEPTABLE for a long time! but who cares over a VIDEO GAME!
-
@Peasant said:
Above all though, there is no current need for homosexual characters in video games. Games are meant to entertain an audience. Dead by Daylight is a horror game above everything else. So unless you want to exploit homophobia there is no direct need for homosexual representation in a horror game.^This
-
@SoylentPixie said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
so when the men said women didnt need the right to vote did they just say yeah its irrelvant yes they did until they fought for it. when african americans wanted freedom from being slaves did they just sit down, no they fought and got thier freedom in the civil war. so if there was no black person in this game it would be weird right? yes it would. if there was no women in this game it would be weird right? yes. my arguement is that they should add a LGBTQ+ character not to check off a list but because people are requesting it.Did you.....did you just compare your demand for an LGBTQ character in a VIDEO GAME, as the same as fighting for womens rights and the end to slavery?
Dear gods.....i don't even......i really do not have words for this. At least not very polite ones. I really do hope that was just a badly worded post that was easy to misread, i really do.
I lost brain cells reading that....its like trying to compare slavery to the holocaust you just CAN'T compare them!
-
@blaahval22 said:
Not always, no. At least not on PS4. I think it depends on the way people exit the game.Yes this because I'm a PS4 User and we don't get #########.
-
I mean when a Survivor quits the killer gets points so I don't see a problem...hell when a Killer leaves the survivors don't get any points.
-
@Mc_Harty said:
Is this snowflake still complaining about the fact there's no bright neon sign above the survivors head that state 'LBGT' ?Nobody wants forced diversity. Nobody wants a gay character to exist simply because they're gay. They would much rather the character be part of the world rather then the world adjusting to the character.
We don't even know if the majority of the survivors are straight. Because in the end it doesn't matter, they're still ######### by a malevolent god that tortures them for food.
Quit being so god damn shallow because you see minorities as a checkbox for your socjus agenda.
Facts!
-
@Orion said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@Orion said:
@Wahara said:
@Orion said:
@Wahara said:
I want to be able to play as a gay character. Why the hell not?And you are playing as a gay character, as far as you know. Just because the devs haven't said they're LGBT doesn't mean they're not LGBT. I said it in my first comment in this thread: just assume they're whatever orientation you are and be done with it.
I understood what you said the first time, but you haven't articulated what threat the explicit inclusion of a sexual orientation would present to the game.
I have previously argued that it has the capability of adding depth and intrigue to characters, whereas you seem to be under the impression that it would do harm, or take away from the game some how. Okay, I'll bite, but you gotta give me something to work with.
I think it's irrelevant to the lore and the characters, the same way it's irrelevant in real life unless you want to know if you can date and/or have sex with someone. I also think it's usually done as a token inclusion, and those always suck.
so when the men said women didnt need the right to vote did they just say yeah its irrelvant yes they did until they fought for it. when african americans wanted freedom from being slaves did they just sit down, no they fought and got thier freedom in the civil war. so if there was no black person in this game it would be weird right? yes it would. if there was no women in this game it would be weird right? yes. my arguement is that they should add a LGBTQ+ character not to check off a list but because people are requesting it.
In this thread, there are more people against it than there are for it, and a large portion of the ones against it are LGBT themselves. Stop trying to frame your position as the morally correct one or even the popular one, because it's simply not true. Having LGBT characters in a game isn't going to help LGBT teenagers who become homeless due to their homophobic parents kicking them out. It's not going to help the high suicide rate due to bullying. It's not going to change anything.
FACTS THANK YOU!
-
Michael Myers for obvious reasons being 1/10 of the personification of evil itself.
-
Yes it's very likely/possible.
-
People have to indicate it or else people (like you) won't get it and take it as a hostile remark.
-
@DwightLivesMatter said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 The Entity is an it, we don't have any clue to know if the Entity has a gender.I concur with this one.
P.S People said the same thing about the living tribunal from Marvel (and cosmic beings) but is labeled as a He/Him instead of "it" so it all depends on the creators.
-
@PigNRun said:
Wahara said:I feel like people have begun to stop seriously engaging with me. The goal posts have been moved all over the damn place. First, I went up against the idea that the request for LGBTQ characters implies an irrational fixation with gender or unnecessary identity politics. Then, I go up against the idea that it "doesn't matter" Then, I go up against the notion a character's identity cannot inform their lore. Now, the argument is but it's too likely to end up portrayed in a damaging manner so we shouldn't try.
Nah. I ain't play'n this game of whack-a-mole. You dears have fun.
So, you were politely refuted each time with valid points in a public board. -Sarcastic "Oh no!"-
I'm not even insulting or belittling or even being negative it's like playing chess with a pigeon!
-
@Wahara said:
I...don't think either of you two are the most constructive participants in this discussion, to be fair.I'm not revisiting the debate for aforementioned reasons, but the issues raised by this discussion, on if and how to represent queer people in dead by daylight, deserved to be treated with a bit more care. The discussion would fair better if it were remade and presented with adequate nuance, and the two of you have agreed to excuse yourselves from it.
Don't need to be constructive in a topic discussion such as this where a 17 yr old believes everyone is wrong for sharing objective opinions and saying we are derailing a discussion that is on-topic.
This isn't really a "debate" and we don't have to excuse anyone it's a public forum not a "He shouldn't state their opinions because we feel it's not fair." and news flash we don't have to treat anything with any care when it's not that "big of a deal" like many people have stated here once again.
A debate is civil between all parties with 0 bias/toxicity and this thread became toxic beyond discussion due to the fact someone here wishes we were wrong when uh yeah new flash WE AREN'T as no "OPINION" is based on pure facts just one judgment and view as stated by MULTIPLE people here! it's not a NECESSARY concept it's just a trivial level stuff which has no gameplay relevance whatsoever! if you don't like it then make your own forum and have discussions there if not you can't tell people they can't do this or that because you feel sensitive about the responses.
-
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@Orion said:
@Wahara said:
@Orion said:
@Wahara said:
I want to be able to play as a gay character. Why the hell not?And you are playing as a gay character, as far as you know. Just because the devs haven't said they're LGBT doesn't mean they're not LGBT. I said it in my first comment in this thread: just assume they're whatever orientation you are and be done with it.
I understood what you said the first time, but you haven't articulated what threat the explicit inclusion of a sexual orientation would present to the game.
I have previously argued that it has the capability of adding depth and intrigue to characters, whereas you seem to be under the impression that it would do harm, or take away from the game some how. Okay, I'll bite, but you gotta give me something to work with.
I think it's irrelevant to the lore and the characters, the same way it's irrelevant in real life unless you want to know if you can date and/or have sex with someone. I also think it's usually done as a token inclusion, and those always suck.
so when the men said women didnt need the right to vote did they just say yeah its irrelvant yes they did until they fought for it. when african americans wanted freedom from being slaves did they just sit down, no they fought and got thier freedom in the civil war. so if there was no black person in this game it would be weird right? yes it would. if there was no women in this game it would be weird right? yes. my arguement is that they should add a LGBTQ+ character not to check off a list but because people are requesting it.
Slavery=/=A Video Game
Women Rights=/=A Video GameThose are some horrible anologies to your "argument" don't compare REAL events for FICTIONAL ones.
Dude! READ WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING! There isn't a ARGUMENT BECAUSE THIS ISNT A DEBATE as there no need for a LGBTQ type concept for characters! Again WRITE FANFIC about it don't try to tell everyone they are "Bullying" you or we are derailing because we are sharing objective opinions.
My mom just got married to her long time girlfriend and she would not care about this trivial concept you want "enforced" because people "demand" for it.
-
@SoylentPixie said:
I really don't understand this need to have something like this defined i really don't, and before we go any further, yes i am a bisexual female, so i don't consider my view to be biased in any way shape or form. The LGBTQ society have been pushing for acceptance for a long time, its slowly been happening and gained great momentum over the years which is awesome. But guess what, with acceptance eventually comes the mundane, the normal. Aside from the hardcore objectors that scream 'Nope!' it's become a normal enough part of society that nobody cares if you are gay, bi, trans and so on.Personally i think that is a way healthier state of mind than applying some stigma to it. As for asking for 'someone' in this games roster to be labelled as LGBTQ, i just don't agree, it is not an important piece of information and it certainly has no bearing on the game itself, especially when the characters are pretty much interchangeable with everybody being able to learn everyone else's perks.
Lastly, and I'm going to try and say this as nicely as possible because i try to be a decent person and i do not know you enough to dislike you.....You are not a mod, you do not get to decide who is and isn't allowed to reply to a post you put up on a public forum. Anybody who puts up a post in any forum has to understand that in doing so, there are going to be opposing opinions. You are asking about a subject that many people have differing views on, and people are allowed to have those views as much as you are allowed yours.
Disagreeing with you is not derailing the thread or bullying you, and if you feel that way, the simplest reaction is to flag the post that offends you, just be aware flagging is not a guarantee that the post will be removed. Being the author of a thread does not give you the right to moderate it beyond requesting it be closed if you think it has gone too far awry. A mod will decide what is and is not appropriate here, not you.
Thank you!
-
@ToolboxMotley said:
@Wahara said:
On a somewhat related note, the unironic usage of the term "snowflake" automatically makes you look like a tool. It's a snarl word used by jerks to discredit/dismiss the sensitivities of people that are different from them.I take offense to using tool as a derogatory term, thank you. My people should not have to endure this abuse.
Facts
-
@xmenfanatic said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i didnt say you had to leave i said you should since there is no reason for you to be here except to constantly tell me im wrong for wanting this so again why are you here whats the reason other than to bother me? just go away please.
- I do have a reason for being here and that's posting
- I never said you were wrong
- No one is bothering you and you playing the victim card because no one agrees with you? how old are you? 12? Like listen man I stated my opinion and clearly the majority agrees with me and even a user who is gay agreed they don't care.
a reason for being here is not to just post it states in the rules of the fourm you are not aloud to de-rail the post which you are by not even participating in the question i asked, also yes you said we shouldnt add a LGBTQ character since it isnt necessary. and yes you are bothering me and i am not playing the victim card since multiple people on here agreed with me and want this, i am 17, you can state your opinion all you want but you dont need to contantly post on this thread because of the sake of posting and the majority is not just agreeing with you its about 50/50 and not everyone has posted here. just because one gay person agreed with not adding this its probably because they dont like labels and i understand that but if your like me you take the label Gay and you make it you, it enpowers you and you say it with pride. if you dont say that your gay because you dont like labels then you probably arent sure that your gay or you went threw some kind of trauma that caused you not to want to label yourself. so again for like the 4th time just go, there is no reason for you to be here if your not going to participate in the thread and basically say no im not when i say you are. i say your bothering me and you sau no your not. i say you have no reason for posting here and you say your reason is to post. I say you stated that this is wrong and you say no you didnt.
You are the only one derailing it and I don't care for the rest of the things you said here now like I said no one really cares for a trivial concept such as "sexuality" for characters in such a video game if you care so much write a fanfic or something because I said "it doesn't really matter."
then if you dont care about it go away from my post theirs no reason for you to de-rail it any longer. and yes multiple people care about the concept of sexuality for characters in video games. look again i say he is de-railing it and he provides on proof and says i am. also i say there are people who care about a LGBTQ+ character being added and he says no one does. see guys? this is the exact definition of a internet troll. and i will just be igrnoring his posts for now on until they add the block feature to the fourms
YOU ARE THE ONE DERAILING IT! Stop quoting me back here! I'm not even trolling you just butthurt because everyone isn't agreeing with your "I need to force my sexuality to feel empowered!" Concept and yes block me! Jeeez for a 17 yr old you act like a 5 yr old.
this poster has plenty of people supporting their desire to talk about queer characters being in the game.
Not really.
@DocOctober said:
@xmenfanatic said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
@MichaelAMyers said:
@TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
i didnt say you had to leave i said you should since there is no reason for you to be here except to constantly tell me im wrong for wanting this so again why are you here whats the reason other than to bother me? just go away please.
- I do have a reason for being here and that's posting
- I never said you were wrong
- No one is bothering you and you playing the victim card because no one agrees with you? how old are you? 12? Like listen man I stated my opinion and clearly the majority agrees with me and even a user who is gay agreed they don't care.
a reason for being here is not to just post it states in the rules of the fourm you are not aloud to de-rail the post which you are by not even participating in the question i asked, also yes you said we shouldnt add a LGBTQ character since it isnt necessary. and yes you are bothering me and i am not playing the victim card since multiple people on here agreed with me and want this, i am 17, you can state your opinion all you want but you dont need to contantly post on this thread because of the sake of posting and the majority is not just agreeing with you its about 50/50 and not everyone has posted here. just because one gay person agreed with not adding this its probably because they dont like labels and i understand that but if your like me you take the label Gay and you make it you, it enpowers you and you say it with pride. if you dont say that your gay because you dont like labels then you probably arent sure that your gay or you went threw some kind of trauma that caused you not to want to label yourself. so again for like the 4th time just go, there is no reason for you to be here if your not going to participate in the thread and basically say no im not when i say you are. i say your bothering me and you sau no your not. i say you have no reason for posting here and you say your reason is to post. I say you stated that this is wrong and you say no you didnt.
You are the only one derailing it and I don't care for the rest of the things you said here now like I said no one really cares for a trivial concept such as "sexuality" for characters in such a video game if you care so much write a fanfic or something because I said "it doesn't really matter."
then if you dont care about it go away from my post theirs no reason for you to de-rail it any longer. and yes multiple people care about the concept of sexuality for characters in video games. look again i say he is de-railing it and he provides on proof and says i am. also i say there are people who care about a LGBTQ+ character being added and he says no one does. see guys? this is the exact definition of a internet troll. and i will just be igrnoring his posts for now on until they add the block feature to the fourms
YOU ARE THE ONE DERAILING IT! Stop quoting me back here! I'm not even trolling you just butthurt because everyone isn't agreeing with your "I need to force my sexuality to feel empowered!" Concept and yes block me! Jeeez for a 17 yr old you act like a 5 yr old.
this poster has plenty of people supporting their desire to talk about queer characters being in the game.
Since I knew that that statement is bullshit, I had a look at every single comment in this thread again and noted down if the people who posted them were pro OP, contra OP or either undecided or had an "off-topic" comment.
Excluding OP, there are only 4 people so far who support OP's request for an LGBTQ character to be added to the game.
9 people were undecided or didn't contribute to that question.
But a big fat majority of 15 people are against adding an LGBTQ character for the sake of having one. That's almost 4 times as many as are for adding one. Of at least 3 of those people, I know that they are gay or bisexual themselves.
Stop talking crap and don't call 4 people "plenty".
Thabk you!
-
@CoolAKn said:
I think it ultimately doesn't matter to most people. People choose their survivors differently. You want to choose a survivor you can relate to, which is fine. For me, I choose based on appearance, so I don't think I would ever play Nea or Quentin (aside from getting their teachable perks and to use up all their offerings and add-ons) because quite frankly, they are ugly survivors. I main David King, mostly because he looks better than Dwight with a beard (even though I wear glasses, I am not bald, which is part of Dwight's beard cosmetic), but I definitely don't relate to David K at all because he can be violent, but I am not. If they ever decided to include sexuality into someone's backstory, that wouldn't make me want to play them any more or less than normal. In my opinion, their backstory only needs to explain their disappearance and why they have the unique perks they do. Nothing else is important because it doesn't affect game play at all. There is nothing truly special about each survivor, because they are just cosmetic. They can discuss sexuality if they want, but I think it would make little difference in the long run.Agreed