MichaelAMyers
MichaelAMyers
About
- Username
- MichaelAMyers
- Joined
- Visits
- 181
- Last Active
Comments
-
Michael is always S tier smh
-
@[Deleted User] said:
Franklin's is easily countered by just leaving the key somewhere.
Pretty much this in a nutshell.
They can leave it near boxes or areas they perfectly remember to retrieve them.
-
@Felnex said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803717#Comment_1803717
- You're gaslighting again. Everything I've said about your arguments I have supported with quotations, zero speculation.
- How am I biased and ignorant? You are just hurling insults now with no basis. That speaks for itself. The only one here who is deeply biased and can't admit it is you, the one who asks a question but already stubbornly has their answer and argues with and insults everyone who has a conflicting view.
- I am accusing you of being dishonest not to be toxic, but because what you say conflicts with how you behave. You are literally being dishonest: It's not an insult, it's an observation. A rational person would clarify their stance and call out any misconceptions I may have (You're not doing this) whereas an irrational/toxic person would hurl insults back as a kneejerk defensive/guilty reaction (That is what you are doing) Also, you do not have freedom of speech here; these are privately owned forums, and you're subject to the rules here. You can be silenced at any moment (American?)
- You are being dishonest. You originally played coy and innocent, "just asking a question" but you have since devolved into passionately (and rudely) arguing your belief. It's almost like your original question wasn't a question at all, but an insinuation, and everything you have said since then proved such. You are very dishonest and you lack self awareness if you cannot see what you are doing. Just be transparent about how biased you are instead of pretending (and failing) to act like you're impartial.
- I don't care what the other member said to you. I didn't even read it. That's not my business. I think you are confusing the two of us, seeing as how you're insulting me with a level of toxicity that I have not levied against you. You're confused with who you're talking to. If you want, I can stop responding to you because you seem totally disoriented: You're fighting battles on multiple fronts, I understand.
Didn't truly read whatever biased/ignorant cesspool of false remarks you made.
Firstly whoever you are (don't care about ya btw) so....lets make some corrections from your falseness vs reality
- Never played "Coy" or "Innocent" i dont give a flying given ######### about that ######### LOL lets get that straight, being dishonest=me giving a fake personality which again YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ME, I make/made it clear before and here you are STILL crying/whining as if you knew me for years lmfao.
- I don't need to call out ANY bs you state about me because I DONT CARE, I DONT CARE ABOUT YOU OR ANYONE WHO DOESN'T KNOW ME also no this isn't a "Privately owned" forum lmfao and being subjected to rules doesn't "Rid" my rights as a HUMAN BEING for my fight for freedom of speech online because as long as I'm not spreading HATRED around the forum (like Zack here is doing) then I can say what I want when I want because by your double standard logic you are against the multiple "Subjected Rules" for continuing it and not stopping yourself with such delusional responses.
- LMFAO you proven to being such a dishonest person by your own words: "I don't care what the other member said to you. I didn't even read it. That's not my business." So lets get this straight so everyone can see....if you don't care what he says then by your own logic you shouldn't be so triggered about what I said back lmfao! if its not your BUSINESS why are you here looking like a Cheerleader? ooooh and yeah DON'T REPLY its BASIC COMMON SENSE you sitting here acting like you are some "High Moral" member of the forum but just exposed yourself to being dishonest as all hell and equally immature as the other person so I'll say this once and only one MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS if it DOESN'T INVOLVE YOU DON"T ENGAGE.
End of this discussion period.
-
@lagosta said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/211454/are-gen-rushers-a-community-problem
I think your definition of Gen Rushing is a little misused by the community. Most survivors tend to use second chances/chase/tracking perks. The ones that give bonus to gen speed a few and situational (Prove Thyself/Leader/Resilience/SC etc). People using this perks are usually trying to get the secondary benefits like vault builds or extra points.
Spawning in a map to have 3 gens done before you can down someone is not gen rushing, is lack of pressure. That is related to map size/killer mobility/rng. If you leave survivors alone they will do objectives, or at least should. This is the issue that requires BHVR attention, and that they've been working with map re-releases.
The toxic gen rush is leaving teammates to go second stage or die bc you didn't bother to leave the gen and rescue. That is an human issue that I think will never be fixed.
Um so you agreeing its still a issue?
-
@Marigoria said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803772#Comment_1803772
So moring a survivor after the first hook isn't sabotaging? Even tho it cuts your in game time more than 50%.
That's legit depending on if the Survivor knows how to play or not.
You know how many people unhooked infront of killers?.....or when I play as Michael himself and see Survivors unhooking infront of me while I'm meters away?......
-
@Marigoria said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803726#Comment_1803726
Would you also consider OP killer addons like iri head + tombstone, and moris "gameplay sabotage" for survivors?
One takes time and has a nerf....
Moris aren't sabotaging.
You naming multiple fallacies that doesn't instantly hinder the survivors from beginning to end.
Michael has to Stalk and build up his tombstone but loses it once they are drained it's not as fast or close to Gens speed.
Moris are varied and have specific methods.....Gens don't.
Michael can't Instant Kill Survivors without fully stalking them numerously and has a limit.
-
@Marigoria said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803709#Comment_1803709
The only thing that survivors need to do to escape is toxic? You need to play another game imo, since all matches for you will be toxic.
You obviously proven you didn't once read my comments or the post.
>Post/Comments state that doing the objectives/escaping isn't toxic.
>clearly didn't read my detailed explanation about how purposely using Perks and Add-Ons to gained the ultimate advantage over a killer in a group (SFW+Chat) knowing damn well you can get gens done 2x quicker to end the match faster. (Isn't being toxic by sabotaging the killers time and experience)
But alrighty like I said your opinion.
-
@Felnex said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803437#Comment_1803437
Don't try to gaslight me. This isn't a community being toxic, this is about quoting things you've said and and throwing them back in your face to expose your dishonesty and hypocrisy. And you're calling me the toxic one? You are something else.
1. Wasn't gaslighting was stating an obvious fact.
2. The community is tho and you are furthering it with me by being so biased and ignorant. 🤷🏻♂️
3. You can't throw something back in someones face when they are "defending" themselves my guy that's not how it works unless you trying to have implications that I have no freedom to defend myself or have a freedom of speech?
4. Can't be dishonest or hypocrisy when I never was dishonested or being a hypocrite. 😂
5. Yes you are also something else when a member started to call me a small brain first and etc (which is by definition being toxic since you wanna throw the word you obviously don't know.) And here you are trying to state I can't defend myself Smh.
-
Slugging is Part of the Game.
-
@Marigoria said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801771#Comment_1801771
I did. Doing gens isn't toxic or sabotaging gameplay.
If you think so that's your opinion I explained it about 4-5 times already but ok. 🤷🏻♂️
-
As long as they aren't furry suits lol.
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803651#Comment_1803651
Nobody said anything against this though?
Never said anyone was just adding we need more.
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803644#Comment_1803644
We have. Hillbilly is disfigured. Ash has his hand/arm amputated. Deathslinger has something with his leg. Claudette has some skin condition(don’t remember which one). Yui is cross eyed.
we neeeeeed more.
-
We need representation for all if we gonna be so ignorant to those who are disabled/disfigured.
-
I'm not offended by heterosexual lore. Did you seriously not understand that I was pointing out that you (people opposing LGBT lore) were treating the possibility of LGBT lore differently from heterosexual lore?
Bruh what?....what are you talking about???
You legit kept saying in this thread no one said this or that about the hetero characters when no one was asking/demanding about this because people DIDN'T know or care for it and I am oppose to "Pandering" and "Forcing" something that isn't beneficial for the actual gameplay.
A LGBT character in the game to only be "represented" as that "One LGBT" Character is as I said putting it in a bad light becauses pressuring/forcing.
Like no one forced the lore on you and you didn't have to read them or acknowledge them hence why Player interpretation is the best method for your arguments because you can make that reliability within your own head-canon.
If simply correcting your statements is being "defense" for you, then yes, I'm being very defensive.
"Correcting" I don't see any correction all I see is someone being close-minded and very defensive because people aren't Agreeing with you 24/7 on all your responses you have yet to give a new argument of how/why it matters for a LGBT in a Horror video game.
Not everyone wants black characters either. Should we toss those? How about female characters? Perks? The game itself? Or can we just let the devs do what they want, one of those things being the inclusion of LGBT lore?
That "Not everyone wants black characters either." isn't a counter argument along with the other stuff you stated here...nothing you said is argumentative just you being so blind to your own bias and their "wants" is because of PANDERING hence why they made a HUGE announcement because so many people kept crying for something as everyone will agree is trivial in a video game.
I don't even understand what this means.
Its not hard to understand that those getting ignored and etc where those against vs those who "Agreed" with you.
I said I may be biased by asking for a B or T character as opposed to L or G. You are, once again, putting words in my mouth.
I won't be replying to you any more because it's become clear to me you're not engaging in good faith. You keep misrepresenting what I'm saying and claiming I'm saying things I didn't say. Have a nice day.
Never once put any words in your mouth when you just said quote on quote:
Nobody is neutral and I literally admitted I might be biased right in the OP. It's the beginning of the second sentence.
Soooo what did I put in your mouth? being bias traits include ignoring the comments,the arguments, and or ignoring the people(s) criticisms, and what have you engaged in good faith? you outright said you were going/being biased.
I haven't once "Misrepresent" you when you did that yourself, and if you didn't say it then you are being yet again blind.
Its like talking to a wall like geez.
-
@Mew said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803352#Comment_1803352
they kind of were, nobody asked for them to have girlfriends/husbands
besides, whose to say a gay character would be forced if its just a part of the character?
Thats a vise versa....you are forcing the character to be "Trans/LGBT" and you can't simply ask a "Fictional" character what their agenda/sexuality/identity its all depending on the creators themselves and its a HARD force of unnecessary pandering without proper representation.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803530#Comment_1803530
Majority of the people don't
A.) Care for the Lore
B.) Don't care for the sexuality (Its not that important to the game itself)
C.) Never noticed it because it doesn't affect them.
Then they (you) won't care if it's added to the lore.
But yet you claimed "Change my mind" but yet you get so defensive when someone isn't absolutely agreeing with your comments/agenda for the game and yes people can see this when you reply if you don't care for the "Negativity" then ignore them and their comments and don't reply with those who don't agree with it.
Most people weren't even on topic. They were addressing the (settled) matter of whether or not LGBT characters should/would be added to the game. As for the ones who were on topic, I like to actually have a conversation with someone, find out their reasons for thinking in a certain way, before I change my mind. I don't blindly accept anything and everything someone else tells me.
This is why i said earlier opinions are opinions for a reason it's subjective and not objective for a reason you clearly speaking from a emotional standpoint and not an actual neutral standpoint.
Nobody is neutral and I literally admitted I might be biased right in the OP. It's the beginning of the second sentence.
Then they (you) won't care if it's added to the lore.
Then you shouldn't be offended by the Hetero lore....you keep mentioning "No one said anything about the Heteros" like...why does that have to be a "Argument"?.....why does a character's sexuality have to be so "prioritised" for you??
Most people weren't even on topic. They were addressing the (settled) matter of whether or not LGBT characters should/would be added to the game. As for the ones who were on topic, I like to actually have a conversation with someone, find out their reasons for thinking in a certain way, before I change my mind. I don't blindly accept anything and everything someone else tells me.
Yet here you are being so "Defensive" when i haven't commented at you?.....It's clearly shown that not everyone wanna see a character specifically seen for and as a Pandering it gives a bad light already when companies do that for Pride Month "Lets only change our stuff for this month to show we can be "Acceptive" but then change it the next month and wait another year!"
Even if most people weren't the ones giving actual reasonings were getting ignored.
Nobody is neutral and I literally admitted I might be biased right in the OP. It's the beginning of the second sentence.
SO WHAT IS THE POINT if you aren't going to LISTEN that is the point of your own post isn't it? and you are OPENLY admitting to Closing your ears to criticism and being biased thats not good in a debating method.
You can't go into a discussion with bias thats a clouding of judgement, I been into the hobby of debating and the moment you show Bias its a huge huge losing point because you aren't seeing the middle but one side.
-
@Awakey said:
Why?
Let me preface by saying I'm not LGBT-phobic or spreading hate speech or anything, I'm just stating my opinion.
If a character is made ONLY to be LGBT and that's their WHOLE personality, then it wouldn't be a good addition, neither would cheesily integrating it into a character's current lore.
WHY does it matter if there's an LGBT character? Why do we need one? What's the point? "oH hEY gUys, wE aDdeD An LGBT cHaRIcTer." I don't care whether my character is a regular ass person or a goddamn gay tomato, I just want the gameplay to be good.
There just isn't a reason.
Thank you for coming to my very short TED talk.
@BadMrFrosty said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/211832/i-get-that-people-want-an-lgbt-character-but
It doesn't matter, it's essentially begging to be pandered to. I've always thought that things like orientation don't contribute anything truly meaningful to a character's development, especially if that's their whole 'selling point'. "Look, a gay character! We added them!" Sounds more like a circus act announcing its unusual freak show star than a genuine attempt at crafting something interesting and new. The best part is that the people that would rather not be viewed this way are typically silent on the issue, and those who advocate for them are often part of a very persistent, vocal minority that look to virtue signal.
@jotaro said:
I agree 100%. This stuff doesn't belong to DbD.
I can agree....there is a difference between Pandering and actually creating a character to show proper representation.
the recent DC Comics "I'm Not Starfire" is a perfect example they specifically highlight the fact she is a lesbian....why does that matter so much to be defined in a summary for the comic series?
-
I'm not saying people are offended by it, I'm saying they didn't care when it was heterosexuals who were added.
Majority of the people don't
A.) Care for the Lore
B.) Don't care for the sexuality (Its not that important to the game itself)
C.) Never noticed it because it doesn't affect them.
Also, for someone who claims not to care or be concerned, you sure are pushing back against it a lot. When I don't care about something, I don't react to it.
But yet you claimed "Change my mind" but yet you get so defensive when someone isn't absolutely agreeing with your comments/agenda for the game and yes people can see this when you reply if you don't care for the "Negativity" then ignore them and their comments and don't reply with those who don't agree with it.
This is why i said earlier opinions are opinions for a reason it's subjective and not objective for a reason you clearly speaking from a emotional standpoint and not an actual neutral standpoint.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1803451#Comment_1803451
Its not too late whatsoever I say no for the concept.
It is. Other characters are already confirmed heterosexual. It's too bad nobody opposed it back then, maybe we could've avoided this whole mess.
the lore doesn't have anything to do with the game itself....there is no "in-Game" story to consider the lore to be that concerning.
So what's your problem? The lore is where it will be mentioned. You will literally never see it unless you go into the character's lore.
> It is. Other characters are already confirmed heterosexual. It's too bad nobody opposed it back then, maybe we could've avoided this whole mess.
Who is really that offended by "Heterosexuality"?....I am not caring or concerned about a fictional characters sexuality/gender in a horror theme genre.
>So what's your problem? The lore is where it will be mentioned. You will literally never see it unless you go into the character's lore.
Um yes.....what is your problem that the lore makes you so upset?....and you proven the fact that no one really cares for the lore like that...so why make this a big deal over something in all honesty a trivial affair.
-
@gibblywibblywoo said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1798610#Comment_1798610
First post best post.
Look at all the low tier killers, OP. Whats the one thing they don't have. Mobility. Chase powers are good but pallets and loops/maps are getting progressivly nerfed for survivors. However mobility is still a major issue with map sizes what they are.
Some killers just do not have the ability to be where they know they have to be.
Some perks allow that but its useless when the terror radius just straights up gives your position away because then the survivor(s) just run or hide and go back.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802531#Comment_1802531
Too late for that.
Serious question, why are you acting as if you're invested in this if you don't read the lore?
Its not too late whatsoever I say no for the concept.
the lore doesn't have anything to do with the game itself....there is no "in-Game" story to consider the lore to be that concerning.
-
@C3Tooth said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1798909#Comment_1798909
- snare to slowdown mid chase, spot a survivor, defend a hex
- dream pallet is much better than madness pallet (you dont know its a fake pallet until you drop it, madness pallet can spotted at close range)
- see survivor highlight
- hard to see him in distance
- ignore borrow time when as sleep
- teleport between gens
- oblivion when as sleep
I actually wish Killers to have alot of tools to use like Freddy, but his basekit is too much. May be make it harder to put Survivors to sleep, but sleeping survivors will get more harm than survivors able to stay awake
- Freddy cant see awake survivors highlight, only sleeping one
- Passive putting to sleep get removed, only affected when in TR, being hit
I think only these would be enough.
that's it??? ######### I have ran circles around freddy's and me and my roommate both have numerously escaped them he isn't broke or OP just a really complex killer to play properly.
-
Thank you Voldemort!
-
@Felnex said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802461#Comment_1802461
I think it's funny to compare when we were talking earlier when you were still trying to fake being honest and reasonable and "just asking a question" to you now. Yeah, this is the real you. Why don't you just stop? You're clearly just a trouble maker.
- Wasn't being fake man you guys love making some delusional speculations about others now I see why people say the DbD community is full of toxicity and you and zack are validating it each time.
- The real me would be "Insulting" and "Roasting" you with 0 f*cks and 0 care and have I? oh no I haven't and why should I stop when the kid himself said "Its a waste of time" and said he would leave but comes back every time with responses despite conceding? if I wanted to be a trouble maker I would have started with the insults which I didn't so scroll up and read up before trying to do some bias criticism lmfao.
- so instead of trying to hop on me for firstly defending myself and secondly for commenting on my OWN post you should try to give some "criticism" to the guy who started to trolling aka yet again ZackDaylight because I dont have time for children.
-
@Zarr0ch said:
Why dont we just....Not mention what anyone is....at all, you can assume or decide which character is what in your own mind. It makes NO difference in a game like this.
/threadx2
Heavily agreed for Player interpretation.
-
@Zender said:
There is barely a ghost of a plot in this game, its a 1v4 PvP style quick-match game. We don't need to bring sexuality of any kind into this game, it just seems so out of place. Forced really.
There are killers, there are survivors, do gens, get hooks, kill, survive to play again. Repeat.
The end.
/thread
-
@Felnex said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1799952#Comment_1799952
That is an obnoxiously huge image to convey a very rude message. You are not superman. Not at all.
I don't care about being Superman my guy. 🤷🏻♂️ If I wanna give out Clown Certificates to people who wanna look like it I will.
@Felnex said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801907#Comment_1801907
You must stop this nonsense. I called you out on all your dishonesty.
You can't call someone out for something they don't care for I don't bend the knee to anyone. :)
-
@Rydog said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802194#Comment_1802194
I changed my mind, facecamp away.
Haha 😂
-
@Negi said:
It's a fundamental game problem. The problem is there are so many bad survivors nowadays who do everything but gens so how can the devs address gens besides designing better maps?
Perk buffs and or a Killer that can def do pressure on any group?
-
@Lefrongo said:
If you're getting close to becoming a red rank, you should've seen this coming so I'm not sure why you're complaining. It's just a strategy that tends to happen a lot, survivors have it just as hard. I keep from gaining a rank to loosing pips rather fast and deranking again, the struggle for survivors are also there. Which is why they should atleast have a cooldown for losing pips way too fast, have you tried tunneling generators? It's one of the few tactics that can tend to help a lot if the generator placements are in favor of the killer, but balancing the map's structure and dead zones being placed at fair areas is something the developers should be working on. Sure we can go back and forward on who's performance is rather weak in terms of winning bloodpoints to the max. Some survivors even wear brightly colored clothing too, which gives the killer an advantage; they probably due it for the challenge. Not actual tome challenges by the way, difficulty can be fun for people but not for everyone.
I'd like to say that there should be a separate category for other players that enjoy their play style, just like Overwatch's "Arcade" mode, it's more for casual players than it is for competitive players who like to get into the ranks. This is one of my few brainstorm ideas, would be neat to have more fun modes instead of just one because sometimes the game can feel rather lacking, making it seem like a high definition mobile game up scaled for console and PC players, not gonna lie there.
I dont care for red ranks and not complaining because its an issue for gameplay regardless.
-
@Rydog said:
"Gen rushing" is such a weird thing to call out as a problem to me. Survivors' central goal -- their main motivation in this game, beginning to end -- is to complete generators. There are obviously options that make this action more efficient, and people will use them, and team up to crush a gen fast, etc. This cannot be a problem, anymore than it is a problem for a baseball team to just keep hitting home runs against their opponents.
The problem is that most killers don't have the mobility to pressure gens thoroughly enough. This is not a survivor problem, because the survivors are just doing what they are supposed to do. It is a killer problem, because many killers lack an appropriate response.
Some saying community some saying gameplay for me its a issue that should be worked upon and not ignored.
-
@Squirrel_Thicc said:
Not a community problem, it's a gameplay problem.
true
-
@zackdaylight said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802097#Comment_1802097
Wow, you still can’t even read. How are you even on this forum? Don’t you have to be at least 13?
oh so my “opinion” isn’t factual yet yours is lmfaoo dude let me meet whoever raised you, they obviously are clueless. It’s actually hilarious how you can’t read
Funny you are the one who cant read you keep proving me right but cant comprehend it, also you don't even have the intellect of a 5 yr old to under that you proven my point that you are the one being the troll (multiple times with evidence) not me so thank you for proving that ;)
Your opinion about the killers being OP grouped or not isn't remotely factual. :)
Yes mines is because its not based on "Opinions" but a objective fact you nimrod.
- You obviously wasn't raised right by the given fact you keep replying when you said this is a waste of time and that you left but you keep coming back for my attention and for my responses which is something that only trolls do online. (Further validating and showing what I said is factual about you.)
- If I can't read how did I respond and debunk your nonsense? jeez your parents must have home schooled you to be this ignorant/illiterate of what responding means since responding to your statements involves me reading and comprehending.
Watch everyone as as Zackdaylight here proves it further and further by his responses and his goal to seek my validation in this post that he can't handle walking away from something he said is below him. (Given that he responded numerously he must be triggered eitherway)
-
@Rydog said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802183#Comment_1802183
Please jam me into a fuse box until my head explodes, thanks.
Nah im throwing you in a furry outfit and have you attend a furry convention.
-
@Rydog said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802149#Comment_1802149
Unrelated, but I applaud the attention to detail in your username, Audrey. 😄
You'll be getting facecamped now.
-
Thats a Big No for me.
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802090#Comment_1802090
Pig is literally Amanda, idk how that's copyrighted
Dead by Daylight=/=Saw
The characters that are licensed in the game can't actually be used like that unless it's the Saw license holders making it hence why I didn't name any licensed characters.
-
Take the salt as a compliment because it shows their insecurity.
-
@zackdaylight said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801830#Comment_1801830
Ah see you have no response because you know you’re wrong. You’re obviously truly an ignorant troll looking for attention because you get none. And yes my response was a counter to what you said. Your counter to “killers are OP” was “killers are definitely not OP, especially in a group” that’s the most asinine response I’ve ever seen. No ######### sherlock. That’s not even a counter response lmfao you’re a clown hahaha
Why would I have a response to someone who didn't just already lose a losing argument but also conceded? do you even logic?
Yes you are a "Truly ignorant troll" you got so triggered because I said Killers aren't OP (Multiple people here can testify its determined on who plays the character) also aren't you the one seeking my attention right now just contradicting yourself now smh.
Your response didn't counter anything I said all you gave was a "weak" subjective opinion not based on any facts nothing you stated was factual just bias from your ego.
If i'm a clown then why is your name on a Clown Certificate due to you conceding? (inb4 he just further proves himself to being the true ignorant troll here who is so hurt that he cant have a last word like some egomaniac)
again?....
-
@zackdaylight said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801875#Comment_1801875
Dude just shut up. I hope your toxic account gets banned from this forum
says the one who needs to "Shut up" and have his account banned himself? you legit getting triggered not me.
-
@Elena said:
Nah you really had to give Shawnee Smith the role of Hag when she could easily play the Pig, the one that she brought to life in the saw movies (kind of)
that wouldn't be possible due to copyrights remember?
-
@Zayn said:
I don't understand why sexuality needs to be so far "represented" in DBD. This is a game about killing or surviving, It's perfectly okay to leave the characters up to interpretation to the one who's playing them instead of having something set in stone. Just my two cents.
Thank you
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1802026#Comment_1802026
I'm going to assume you don't read the lore. If so, this won't affect you because you will literally never read it.
The lore shouldn't really matter since its like filler in anime.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801976#Comment_1801976
That makes no sense. DbD has a well defined lore, nobody's going to add fan fiction to it.
Fans do it all the time and that fits better than just defined stuff.
People ship Dwight and David, Nurse and Pig, and etc it should be more or less keeping it more about their "History" and not their "Sexual"/"Sexual Identity"
-
@[Deleted User] said:
I mean, a sentence or two in the characters bio hinting at LGBT elements of their character is fine with me.
But if being LGBT is the core part of the characters identity and design, that's a no-go for me.
Agreed with this.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801916#Comment_1801916
Killers do have good anti-gen perks. They're just reliant on pressure and downs, which killers like Pig struggle with against good teams. In my example, that rank 1 Pig had 2 hooks total at the 6 minute mark. Struggled to even hit anyone due to her weak-ish power. My example is the extreme end of things because it's a competitive environment against 2000+ hr survivors that practice together all the time, but it's all relative. A Freddy with Ruin/Undying creates a sense of urgency to cleanse. A Clown with that same build is a non-factor against that same team.
Man you making it sound like Killers aren't that OP but agree it has to do with the power+perks they have.
-
@Orion said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801941#Comment_1801941
They still have characteristics. Harry Potter isn't gay, Doom Slayer isn't a woman, and Tyrion Lannister isn't a giant. We're not writing fan fiction here.
I mean fan fiction still makes them whatever they want which is why it should feel that way for a Horror Video Game.
-
Yeah Im on servers rn
-
@noctis129 said:
Idk. But I'll take the 10k BP. Thanks devs. Keep doing what ur doing and ignore the complainers.
Big facts
-
@Botiz said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1801885#Comment_1801885
Yep. A forum mod even stated "temporary bans do not show on people's profile, so assuming they got no punishment is wrong" however the fact the OP of the thread was told that it wasn't enough info at least suggests that they didn't receive a punishment. Also i'm not sure why you'd tell the person who made the report that it's "not enough info" if you were to then punish them anyways...
Agreed that doesn't sound right.