Avatar

AsherFrost

AsherFrost

About

Username
AsherFrost
Joined
Visits
2,429
Last Active

Comments

  • No, when I bring it the timer runs out before I lose the chase post-unhook, and I don't care for using it in EGC.

  • @HexDaddyissues said:

    i heard a saying somewhere, but i'll paraphrase

    "ultimately, you become the person who would've saved you when you needed them."

    living true to yourself is the biggest flex you can do. much love friend

    That's beautiful. I gotta share that with my loved ones.

  • @Sluzzy said:

    Laurie Strode has entered the chat.

    She is 57 years old in the last movie.

    Yeah, but they are very clearly basing her in game model off of the earlier films.

  • @Munqaxus said:

    Because it's very tough for them to get away from killers when they're using walkers!

    https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/YYLNTW35CH0T/image.png

    Speaking like someone who's never been hit with one of those damn things, lmao. (Don't get between my granny and pro wrestling, ever)

  • @Wrecked said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2936953#Comment_2936953

    LOL I’m sorry for making you cry, but it’s extremely touching to know what I said resonated with you that much. That means a lot! <3

    All good 😊

  • @Dabrownman1812 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2936343#Comment_2936343

    Either way is lazy, even if one is likes better, just slapping on lgbtq on a character that fans fantasize about is lazy. It's difficult with tokenism because it's always about virtue signalling, even if someone likes it. I have characters that are lgbtq, and the focus isn't on their sexuality. So to see dbd with all their resources take that out is irksome. I don't mind if david king was gay, but it seems very forced. Even if the situation was relatable to some members, the writing and broadcasting seems forced vs being organic.

    Have you actually read the lore entry in question, or are you assuming based on a Twitter post? Because it would be really, really lazy to criticize lore you haven't actually read... Like doing s book report without ever having read the book, lazy

  • @Wrecked said:

    This post might be quite lengthy, but I’ll try to keep it as short and to the point as I can.

    I’ve been playing DBD since 2017 and David King was always a character that jumped out to me. I’m from Manchester (England) and I found it so cool that David was also from here as I’ve never seen that before in a video game, as normally when a character is British they’re from London. Seeing how much detail the developers put into his perk names / quotes was amazing, as I never imagined seeing things like “Dead Hard’ and ‘No Mither’ being used as they’re just such niche expressions used in my home town.

    I’ve grown up around sports and they were always something I excelled at during my time in school. Rugby was always my thing and then I got into kickboxing during my college years and now I’m a full-time Personal Trainer, which is just a dream job.

    Since about the age of 7 I’ve known I was ‘different’ - I had girlfriends as that was what my family expected from me. Being anything other than heterosexual wasn’t ever discussed in my family. Men got with women and women got with men. That’s what I was brought up knowing to be true. I felt hollow for the longest time as I was living a life that I didn’t feel in control of. I was in auto-pilot for a long time, just doing what was expected from me and not doing what I actually wanted to do.

    I went on a journey of self-discovery at the age of 25 when I realised that not allowing myself to be authentic was slowly killing me and it couldn’t go on much longer. I came to the conclusion that I was not a heterosexual male, but I was in fact a homosexual male. Being so heavily involved in sports for all my life just felt like I was locked in a cage. It’s no secret that that world can be deep rooted in homophobia and hearing some of the comments fellow teammates would make, just didn’t leave me feeling safe enough to be my true self. I loved sports and didn’t want to give that up and I felt like if they knew the real me, I’d be disowned. These feelings also lead back to my family. My mum was always talking about grandkids and how she couldn’t wait for me and my then-girlfriend to have them. I just had such an immense pressure on my shoulders to stay in the closet, but it eventually reached a boiling point.

    When I did eventually ‘come out’ I got my fair share of bigoted comments from people I once classed as friends and family. Some didn’t understand how I could possibly be gay, because I wasn’t effeminate and had girlfriends. Which really boiled my blood. I didn’t realise somebody’s sexuality was a personality trait? Why couldn’t I be into ‘masculine’ things and still be gay? It never made sense to me.

    Now this brings me back to David. Him being gay just resonates with me so damn much. We almost feel like the same person now. Some people don’t understand why representation is important, but this is why. If I had a character like David King whilst I was growing up, it would have made it a lot easier for me to accept who I was and realise there was never anything wrong with me.

    I truly appreciate what Behaviour has done and I hope that the increase in representation we’re seeing throughout the media will make it easier for the youth of today, as my childhood / teen years truly felt like hell.

    Thanks for reading and I’ll see you in the fog. 

    https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/C0FTIY6JSHYE/whatsapp-image-2022-05-02-at-12-09-04-pm.jpeg

    Well, thanks for making me cry in an airport, lol.

    Seriously though. That's awesome. Thank you for sharing this

  • @Petition2makeFelixbi said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2928106#Comment_2928106

    "Did you complain about Felix having a girlfriend and child?"

    YES

    Name checks out.

  • @CluelessWanderer said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2933194#Comment_2933194

    Yeah but it's VOX lmao.

    I'll give it a go, but Vox is the most neo-liberal media out there. Do you have something less terribly biased?

    How about this.

    First, read it. Then if you feel that somehow the reporting of historical usage of a term has been tainted by bias by them, we'll go from there. I didn't choose that article because of the website. I picked it because it directly links to the sources it is using, so you can research it yourself if you feel some part is incorrect.

  • @CluelessWanderer said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2933074#Comment_2933074

    I use the word "woke".

    I'm gay. I was surprised they ret-conned David, but now that I see his new cosmetic, I'm totally on board (I'm shallow that way) and currently leveling him lol. In the end, I'm actually glad they chose him because he doesn't look like a mish-mash of gay stereotypes.

    I think of the term "woke" not as people who are liberal and progressive (which is usually good). It refers to extreme neo-liberalism over classic liberalism.

    In this context, it would be accusing everyone who isn't ecstatic about this change as carte blanche hating gay people when in fact, they probably don't. I've seen people who would have had no problem with a new character being gay, just didn't like changing an existing one, yet they are still accused of homophobia which is not cool. Not everyone with criticism (so long as it is non-destructive) is auto-homophobic.

    "Woke" refers to the type of people who claim to be "right side of history" when they have a tendency to weaponize the progressive stack against those they believe to be lower on it than they are. Just muh opinion.

    I think you may enjoy reading this

    https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/culture/21437879/stay-woke-wokeness-history-origin-evolution-controversy

  • @KateMain86 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2933094#Comment_2933094

    I'm not asking for exclusion of anything. I'm saying creators create what they want but don't wave a big "representation matters" flag over your work as the driving motivation for making the things you make and most certainly do not ever feel obligated to do it. If someone wants to make a game with gay characters in it then go for it. The customers can decide if they want to keep consuming that content. Lets treat straight and gay characters all the same without making a big deal about either one when we do. Thats normalization. If the goal is to sway the minds of everyone in the world to see both as normal then no amount of representation is ever going to change that. I honestly believe if people just stopped doing this for representation sake there would be far less arguing over it.


    It seems like you don't understand why representation matters. I would suggest you start with the linked article, it's a lot lighter reading than a research paper on the subject, though I've links to those if you would like

    https://thestateofsie.com/edward-schiappa-will-grace-contact-hypothesis-psychological-theory/#:~:text=Will%20%26%20Grace%20can%20effect%20a%20change%20in%20perception&text=In%20Will%20%26%20Grace%2C%20viewers%20%E2%80%9C,grounded%20in%20psychosocial%20empirical%20evidence.

  • @KateMain86 said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2933064#Comment_2933064

    Its more of a hot topic than legion lore. I'm against all representation in video games when things are done for that sole purpose. I think video game developers should develop video games and the players can feel how they want about it, including if they feel represented or not. I feel like many game developers feel obligated to do this these days because of real life social influences and outcries. I've been playing video games my whole life. There was a time where no one cared about this stuff in video games and yet everyone played them and loved what they loved. What is wrong with that being the norm again? We don't need to make a narrative about representation in video games. People can identify with what they like in the games they play and that is perfectly fine. We shouldn't be worried about if all the representation check boxes have been filled in video games. Its really a non issue that people have made into an issue.

    Ah yes, the old "nobody ever cared before" which really just means you weren't paying attention. Followed by "can't we just go back to not talking about it?"

    I highly doubt you were playing games back in 1983, when Edward Said was publishing research on the prevalence (even then) of white male heroes, while every other race was reserved for the villain.

    Of course, you are correct that people didn't bring up sexuality then, probably because it was still considered "self defense" to murder another man if you thought he was flirting with you, and the president was on television saying that AIDS didn't matter because it was just killing "the gays".

    Weirdly enough, as people got more used to the idea that gay people didn't deserve death just for existing, the conversation that's been going on since at least '83 expanded to include their feelings as well.

  • @Mooks said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2933061#Comment_2933061

    Big? Arguable.

    trying to go ‚woke‘? The employees that are writing and presenting the stuff are genuinely standing behind inclusion and good representation. It’s something they care about. Is that ‚woke‘?

    also, what’s the term for people against any kind of LGBTQ+ representation that are hiding behind ‚arguments‘ like calling companies woke?

    It has been my experience that anyone who uses "woke" to mean any liberal, progressive, or inclusive decision a group makes. (As opposed to the actual traditional meaning of woke since the 20s, which is aware of the threats facing you as a minority in society) is someone who is not honestly looking for debate, as much as just spoiling for an argument.

  • @Bran said:

    I don't look at the lore so I wouldn't know. If I did view the lore and read something I could criticize I'd tell you.

    So you haven't read any of the lore, and actually have no idea how it's written, because you didn't care... Right up until someone was confirmed as gay.

    Now you still haven't actually read anything, but you're clearly upset by it. Do you really think it's a mystery to people what changed? Because it isn't, and it's really not a good look. Though I do appreciate the honesty of admitting that until it involved a man being gay, you didn't care at all.

  • I don't even see it as cocky, just a survivor willing to gamble a health state to get a gen done. If you haven't been hooked, it's not a terrible trade.

  • @SilentShepherd said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2932274#Comment_2932274

    All of society is built around it because evolutionary design made heterosexuality the standard, for the survival of the species. 97% of people are born this way.

    This is what you wanted though, you welcome this silly pandering by BHVR because you want external validation and to argue with people on internet forums. Can we get back to gameplay issues

    Thats up to you. Plenty of forum threads still going discussing gameplay, yet here you keep returning to loudly try to convince everyone of how little you care, no matter how many posts it takes. If you truly didn't care, you could just ignore it, but it's clear that something about people different from you feeling the tiniest bit of representation just has your panties all tied up in a knot. Why is that, do you think?

    Honestly I just find it hilarious how many people need to make multiple posts and even new threads all about how little they care about David's sexuality. It's like that Will Farrell bit on Conan when he had a bird on his shoulder he refused to acknowledge. Y'all put more effort into something you claim doesn't matter and you don't care about than indi this whole game.

  • @Somna said:

    It depends. For example, if the gen was 99% and you weren't actively working on it when she showed up, then tapped it to complete it once she did, that's pretty toxic. But if you were working on it the entire time and then she showed up right as it finished...not your fault.

    Why would that make a difference? Whether it was op or another survivor who did the first bit of work, it's the team's success the rides on it being completed.

  • @IlliterateGenocide said:

    I Just got toxic for finishing a gen IN front of a artist face.

    I Knew she had pop because I saw it before.

    She still won.

    I asked "Why BM" and that was her response "Did a gen in my face"

    Do you guys consider this toxic?

    Not at all. If you can get it finished, it would be dumb not to. You're trying to win.

  • @SilentShepherd said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2932217#Comment_2932217

    Youre the one making a big deal about it. Not me. Only explanation is you feel insecure and need external validation to have random video games that have nothing to do with sexuality ...

    I wonder why. What possible reason could exist? I mean, what is it about having people literally making a living by very publicly coming out saying you are evil, weak, doomed to hell, etc may end up giving someone the desire to have their identity validated.

    What insecurity could possibly be created by entire "treatment" programs existing for decades all over the world, countries where kissing the one you love is punishable by prison or even execution, politicians literally debating whether or not you can be allowed near children before going on to receive over 50% of their constituents vote.

    Just boggles the mind.

    Ever think that maybe the reason hetero people don't tend to need validation is because it's literally already provided by all of society being built around hetero relationships?

  • @Bran said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2931330#Comment_2931330

    We can never really know what actually happened behind the scenes.

    You seem confused, this isn't a maybe thing. They announced 2 years ago, GaymerX also announced it, they've been pretty clear on what they were doing.

  • @Bran said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2931157#Comment_2931157

    At least people wouldn't feel as if they just played eenie minie moe and just wrote lore to justify it as they did now.

    The only people who feel that way are uninformed and haven't been paying attention for the last 2 years that BHVR has been working with GaymerX and other members of the community literally on this. Far cry from "eenie meenie minie, mo"

  • @ThatOneDemoPlayer said:

    In 8 Trails, CoH was brought into The Trial 3 times.

    If my math is correct, which it probably isn't, then it has been used around 2% of the time.

    What happened? CoH is still good.

    I'm not complaining, less CoH is always good, but the Perk was nerfed from 'OP' to 'Very Good', so why'd it pretty much die?

    Same thing happened when DS was nerfed. A bunch of survivor only streamers convinced their fans that if they didn't run it, that would somehow make BHVR revert the changes. The "perk boycott" or whatever you'd like to term it lasted about a week.

  • @Tsulan said:

    We already have a gay killer (legendary skin). The Chatterer (aka Pinhead).

    I'm not sure if the cenobites count or not, if they do, the Hell Priest is likely the first for many things.

  • @GoodBoyKaru said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2927602#Comment_2927602

    Spirit having a horrifically abusive dad after losing his job, only to then have him find out that the Yamaoka bloodline won't even continue? Abuse continues and she works double jobs just to stay out of the house for as long as possible. Already established as something she did in lore, links to the underlying themes of the chapter since it's first release, etc. Spirit could be good if written well especially since she's one of the more sympathetic killers

    This is why I like you, because you are ######### brilliant.

  • @GoodBoyKaru said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2927583#Comment_2927583

    I mean Trapper was abused by his dad for being too artistic until he snapped and killed all the workers from his dad's abuse so honestly it'd make sense if he hid himself being gay too from his dad 🌝

    Absolutely, it was more spirit and hag I can't justify, just feel it.

  • @GoodBoyKaru said:

    I will happily take gay Trapper especially given his lore ✨

    Trapper, Spirit, and hag make the most sense to me. Can't explain why fully, just their lore seems to fit to me somehow.

  • I'm surprised his thread is still going. Did the OP ever show the video they claimed they would, where they picked billy and both addons to prove it wasn't just a hack?

  • artworks-000240362127-jm1idw-t500x500.jpg

    The nasties will lose interest in time to move to the next thing.

  • @GoodBoyKaru said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2926391#Comment_2926391

    considering the absolute minefield of twitter right now too even im shocked ive made it this long without saying something to get me banned

    May be a good time to take a break and just remember how adored you are

  • I mean, you know that the people who do the coding aren't also the people who do the lore writing, right?

  • @DoomedMind said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2926296#Comment_2926296

    "Anyway, have a great day and remember, I really don't care about your opinion of me", wow that's another level of hypocrisy, you're too much insisting on that, for someone who wishes to someone to have a great day, it's unnecessary.

    On the topic again, I know what are the letters but it's just, uhh, yeah it's just too much, and, you know, I wasn't typing anything like an idiot after the LGBTQ, this is called Regex. And it's not a joke, it's just to point out the fact that it's unnecessary complicated for an acronym, I mean, yeah to some you can say LGBT+, others will spit you on the face for not saying the other letters.

    Oh and YES, it's tiring to see how companies makes LGBTQ things a business, and everyone is happy. If someone recognise LGBTQ people as being completely common and normal, you wouldn't make a big deal about it. I don't think we're making any advertising for straight and/or cisgender people- or should I say, I'd like people to stop stomping and insulting cisgenders. That's why I clicked on the OP post.

    You don't have to be on the defensive like that, we're just talking

    You're walking into a monkey enclosure to ask the guy cleaning his face why they're pissed, after the place was already cleaned. Seriously. I'm frankly surprised karu is still engaging with the nasty after the last thread, just shows he is a good boy

  • @GoodBoyKaru said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2925349#Comment_2925349

    No way did you just bring out the "I have gay friends so I can't be homophobic" line like?????

    I didn't even take her for a conservative politician, lmao

  • 3-4 people dead or escaped, depending on which side I'm playing.

  • Its ok, I'm just jealous because when I started discovering myself the best options for inspiration involved a hike to the woods to dig up old magazines.

  • I use the Status Audio SAANC-FS Flagship ANC Headphones. They aren't wired, but do have the ability to go wired (cable included). I've used them on Xbox, switch, PS5, laptop and on my phone, I like the sound quality a lot, and really love the battery life, which appears to be something around like 40-100 hours. (I'm not kidding, I fly twice a week, listening to music for 6-8 hours at a time, play PS5 in the hotel for 3 hours a night all week, and still only charge them once a month) I cannot recommend them highly enough for just about anything you need headphones for.

  • @_NIGHTMARE_ said:

    Sorry, but what does an erection have to do with Frame-rates? I fail to see the correlation, myself.

    Regardless, your refund would depend upon where you brought the game from and thier own policies.

    Try bringing it up with whoever sold you it and mention the frame rate and optimization issues. If you've had the game for a while, they will most likely choose not to refund you - but it's worth a shot anyway.

    Some Millennials apparently can't finish if the video starts buffering midway through.

  • @kaneyboy said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2923970#Comment_2923970

    So if you get camped to death 3 games in a row you wouldn’t say that ruined your game? Huh

    Nope, may not have been the most possible fun, but far from ruined.

  • @_ZZlaya_ said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2925064#Comment_2925064

    Just tell me WHY behavior couldn't make a completely new character? Some people will find him attractive and play as this survivor.

    And the fans of David wouldn't be frustrated with so big changes in their favorite character. That´s so a simple solution.

    Why???

    What makes you believe you are representative of all David Fans? According to your own posts, you don't even play the character, your boyfriend does (and after this thread I'm wondering if you even allow him an option) every actual David main I've ever met has been a gay man. Why do you believe your experience trumps theirs?

  • @_ZZlaya_ said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2925044#Comment_2925044

    First of all, there was already mentioned a girlfriend in his lore.

    https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/ONNGZN7YRV95/image.png

    And in simple words, I´m angry with rewriting the story of an existing character as they want, don't taking care of fans. Just imagine if your favorite survivor is Kate/Feng/Meg etc, and in the next tome suddenly it comes that she has a cock.

    I would see no issue with that. My favorite survivor is Claudette. If I found out in the next lore drop that she was transgender (you know, the actual term adults use, instead of being transphobic ######### stains) it wouldn't bother me a bit. She could be a lesbian, she could be straight, she could be ace. Wouldn't hurt me any because I am happy at the variety of life and don't decide which character I like based on my lust.

  • @NekoGamerX said:

    this don't feel forced people take years to come out.

    I'm pretty sure most david mains are gay imo including me.

    Right? It's like Gay/bi/etc wrestling fans.

    You're showing men in underwear, who are hot, grabbing each other. Of course I'm going to watch.

  • @_ZZlaya_ said:

    I feel totally deceived. My opinion is that such important information about any characters shouldn't be thought up and added to the lore after years of this character already being in the game! That is so forced, unnatural, you just have chosen one of the survivors and started to rewrite the whole his life!

    You know, that´s really unfair. As a woman, I´ve just lost my favorite male survivor. I think that having some ideal characters, maybe even sexualized is OK in videogames, so why the hell you are don´t take care of the female part of your community???

    I understand the needs of LGBTQIA2+ community, but you could make for them a new character so that your changes wouldn´t inflict the current fan base of any already existing survivor.

    So basically

    "I used to fantasize about this character in a video game. Now that I know he wouldn't want to be with me in real life, I'm upset. Why aren't you specifically releasing characters I can flick my bean to?"

    Cringiest take so far. Actually reminds me of an old friend of mine who, upon telling a girl that had crushed on him that he is gay, had to endure months of harassment and abuse and "why couldn't you just do it for me, guys get hard all the time anyway!" Entitled toxic bullshit.

    I'm sorry. I'm sorry that you can't connect with a character of a different gender unless you could have sex with that person in real life, That sounds like a difficult thing to have to deal with.

    There are literally gay children all around the world who are being told daily that being gay is bad, and makes them a weak, craven thing. Some of those children will now be able to look at David and see even the King of survivors can be a proud gay man. Personally I think that's a bit more important than whether or not the game provides you with fodder for your wank bank.

  • I would say y'all need Jeebus, but he didn't do too much for LGBTQIA+ acceptance when he was alive and his biggest fans are kinda dicks about the whole thing so...


    Y'all need Big Gay Al.

  • @_ZZlaya_ said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2925000#Comment_2925000

    Man, that´s the same as poor Dumbledore in Harry Potter! Doesn't it feel forced that he is suddenly gay 10 years after the last book was written???

    Kind of a big difference there.

    On one hand we have an author who, after she already finished the series says "well, this character was gay the whole time, even though I never did anything, wrote anything or in any way supported that idea in the actual books"

    On the other we have a game where lore about each character is given out piecemeal, where after working with GaymerX for over a year, decided that the next reveal for David's lore is his sexuality.

  • @mustdogen said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2924867#Comment_2924867

    Fun fact, there's a super easy solution.

    It's called.....drumrolls please,"read the word".

    I am survivor.

    So play some matches as killer. Redress the balance. Be the change you want to see.

  • Whichever 🙂 I'm not really picky.

  • @Hanzo_Hasashi7 said:

    if balancing team could do half of what they do in designing team we had a balanced game

    does lgbt whatever gonna balance the game?

    does it balances the map?

    does it lessens the toxicity?

    does it nerfs op perks?

    before criticizing my comment think for a minute

    Why do you believe it's an either/or thing?

‹ 1 2 3 … 45