Skip to content
Avatar

sadmuffins13

sadmuffins13

About

Username
sadmuffins13
Joined
Visits
731
Last Active

Comments

  • @Incirion said:

    https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/389340#Comment_389340

    I actually got stuck in the grab animation one time, reached out to grab them, and they ran off, they didnt take a hit or anything, and my hand was stuck out stretched like i was grabbing. A basic m1 attack fixed it, but the survivor got away when they should have been grabbed, and that was annoying

    This has happened to me before. I hope you were still able to hook them.

    in How to instantly grab someone as the spirit? Comment by sadmuffins13

  • @Susie_ said:

    Was he scared or doesn't like that Clown is good anti looper?

    He just didn’t like the killer. Didn’t have a fear of clowns. Felt the power didn’t leave much room for counter play. The clown was just the killer he didn’t like going against.

    in Does the clown secretly scare players? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • AntiJelly said:

    @sadmuffins13 said:
    With the new decisive strike change i think its safe to say we will be getting new obession perks. One for killer's and survivor's. What are your guys thoughts on this? Will this shake up the game? Personally i want another hex perk. Something maybe more viable then ruin, or equal in power. 

    Where...did you draw that conclusion? DS nerf = Obsession perks for new chapter? What?

    Well we havent had a new obession perk in awhile. An behaviour likes to leave subtle hints. Is it such a farfected guess???
    in New obsession perks with the new chapter Comment by sadmuffins13
  • PhantomMask20763 said:
    An obsession hex perk. Nuff' said
    When someone cleanses the hex totem they become the obsession and exposed for time they are the obsession. To op lol?
    in New obsession perks with the new chapter Comment by sadmuffins13
  • fluffybunny said:

    Good job! That's awesome. <3

    Thank you! Next achievement is doing the three blinks and grab. But im in no rush to do that lol
    in I did it!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • TreemanXD said:

    @UwU said:
    Nurse is probably the easiest killer to get adept on because she doesn't need perks to win, just good addons lol, surprised it took you this long.

    Console....

    After many failed attempts i finally got my adept nurse achivement. Felt so freaking good. I swear this game did not make it easy. I kept getting the farm map. Which i think is the worse map for her because of corn vision. To anyone trying to get this dont give up. The practice you get with her is so worth it. Someone said on here to not use any add ons an just get used to her base power. All i can say is thank you def helped me get used to her. To any god nurses out there  i comend you. Im gonna continue to main my spirit tho. As powerful as the nurse is. I love my girl Rin. 

    Congrats @sadmuffins13!!!

    Thank you!
    in I did it!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • UwU said:

    Nurse is probably the easiest killer to get adept on because she doesn't need perks to win, just good addons lol, surprised it took you this long.

    I disagree hillbilly is the easiest... An it took my so long because trying to learn her in red ranks is not fun. Rank reset def helped. Everyone has killers they are good with. Nurse is not one of them for me. 
    in I did it!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • PhantomMask20763 said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    PhantomMask20763 said:
    Congrats!!! Was it on console?
    Yea PlayStation 😭😂
    Wow, I havent even tried cause I suck at nurse, sometimes I get 4ks but that's always on rank reset 
    Yea could definitely feel the differnce in ranks this time around. Plus knowing the maps and loops does help. 👌
    in I did it!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • PhantomMask20763 said:
    Congrats!!! Was it on console?
    Cant wait for dedicated servers.
    in I did it!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • PhantomMask20763 said:
    Congrats!!! Was it on console?
    Yea PlayStation 😭😂
    in I did it!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Poweas said:

    Well done! Good job.

    Thank you!
    in I did it!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • PhantomMask20763 said:
    Dolphin9192 said:

    Myers tier up music and darn

    *insert Halloween theme*
    This will give me nightmares thanks lol
    in When someone mentions of Dead by Daylight Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Feng all day everyday lol
    in Which survivor do you main ? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Trapper should be the strongest killer in the game since it’s basically the games mascot. 
    in Should Trapper get special traps? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    Gorgonia said:

    W> @ChesterTheMolester said:

    Gorgonia said:u


    ChesterTheMolester said:


    Gorgonia said:


    Orion said:

    @Gorgonia said:

    I never said they shouldn’t? I’m talking about when they use gay as in “man, that’s gay” (?

    That doesn’t make people ######### unless they go overboard about it knowing it can alter someone else’s peace of mind.

    I never said you never said they shouldn't. I said that you should speak for yourself instead of projecting, in your words, your "over sensitive" nature to the entire LGBT community.

    I think I mentioned I never felt oppressed due to my sexuality? I’m not over sensitive myself but many of my friends are and sometimes they react badly towards unintended offenses or jokes coming from people that ignore what being gay is and how gay people feel when their sexuality/orientation is used as a joke. Not justifying them, just saying that before we get mad we need to try and educate those people.

    Sorry but you contradict yourself there, you say its unintended that means there is no offense given, yet claim you don't justify that as if there was a crime.

    Given that its unintended, they may need to learn to differentiate between the two, because emotions don't justify actions, no matter if you are gay or misinterpreted a joke. They are after all responsible for their own behavior. 

    I’m saying that I’m not justifying the joke or the offense based on their ignorance or lack of intention. How is that contradictory? And how is an unintended action with a negative consequence not an offense? Negligence does have a consequence, legally.
    Correct me if I read your response incorrectly

    Im not talking legal term, and i haven't said there was no offense, there was no offense GIVEN. Huge distinction. If someone takes offense and reacts "badly", and the result is something unethical, then its all on the one who has taken the offense , in this case the gay. Saying that just because someone is LGBT he is not in control over his emotion is not only ridiculous but attacks their agency in return.

    Okay, I think I know where the confusion is.

    Someone feels offended by a joke and gets mad. Offender doesn’t know he is provoking this.
    I said I don’t justify the offender because of his negligence, I also said that instead of getting mad at them I would rather educate them.

    Unfortunately some people dont want to be educated. They are close minded an ignorant. Until they go through a similiar situation it means nothing to them. People would rather provoke and get a rise out of somebody then actually talk. An i personally don't have time to waste on it. An what do you mean joke??? Because i dont see how its funny. Its more like someone is taking a word and turning it into a negative. A word people use to idetify themselves with. So now am i a stupid gay...? Hahaha no.... How about we educate these people by throwing them a dictionary?
    Another appeal to emotion here.
    And what i've said applies to you too, just because you don't think its funny does not mean they are close minded and ignorant, though im pretty sure you will assume it, which would speak more about your misanthropic mindset than it does about them.

    And btw being ignorant is different from being an edge lord. 
     Seriously trying to justify something that is wrong? If something bothers me i will speak up. Its not being sensitive its called speaking my mind. Ive delt with people like you. An im done entertaining you. 
    Congratulations, you failed to read. 
    There is no thing as universal wrong when it comes to jokes, its highly context related, especially regarding who the audience of the joke is. And if you saw the thread in entirety then you'd know that i said that actual homophobic attacks should be banned so get out of here if you don't even know what the conversation you mixed yourself in is about.
    I know what this thread is about. Read the comments. Saw something someone said and commented. Saying thats gay isnt a joke...  Maybe you should be the one leaving. Your always getting into arguemnts with people on here. Your toxic bro. 
    Gay can be the punchline of a joke, its all up to context and the nature of the joke itself (which does not necessarily have any negative connotations), your perspective does not change what the joke was objectively. 

    Im not having arguments all the time btw, most are just conversations.
    And if getting into arguments is what makes me toxic, you should have a look at track record of @Orion btw.

    ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    Gorgonia said:

    W> @ChesterTheMolester said:

    Gorgonia said:u


    ChesterTheMolester said:


    Gorgonia said:


    Orion said:

    @Gorgonia said:

    I never said they shouldn’t? I’m talking about when they use gay as in “man, that’s gay” (?

    That doesn’t make people ######### unless they go overboard about it knowing it can alter someone else’s peace of mind.

    I never said you never said they shouldn't. I said that you should speak for yourself instead of projecting, in your words, your "over sensitive" nature to the entire LGBT community.

    I think I mentioned I never felt oppressed due to my sexuality? I’m not over sensitive myself but many of my friends are and sometimes they react badly towards unintended offenses or jokes coming from people that ignore what being gay is and how gay people feel when their sexuality/orientation is used as a joke. Not justifying them, just saying that before we get mad we need to try and educate those people.

    Sorry but you contradict yourself there, you say its unintended that means there is no offense given, yet claim you don't justify that as if there was a crime.

    Given that its unintended, they may need to learn to differentiate between the two, because emotions don't justify actions, no matter if you are gay or misinterpreted a joke. They are after all responsible for their own behavior. 

    I’m saying that I’m not justifying the joke or the offense based on their ignorance or lack of intention. How is that contradictory? And how is an unintended action with a negative consequence not an offense? Negligence does have a consequence, legally.
    Correct me if I read your response incorrectly

    Im not talking legal term, and i haven't said there was no offense, there was no offense GIVEN. Huge distinction. If someone takes offense and reacts "badly", and the result is something unethical, then its all on the one who has taken the offense , in this case the gay. Saying that just because someone is LGBT he is not in control over his emotion is not only ridiculous but attacks their agency in return.

    Okay, I think I know where the confusion is.

    Someone feels offended by a joke and gets mad. Offender doesn’t know he is provoking this.
    I said I don’t justify the offender because of his negligence, I also said that instead of getting mad at them I would rather educate them.

    Unfortunately some people dont want to be educated. They are close minded an ignorant. Until they go through a similiar situation it means nothing to them. People would rather provoke and get a rise out of somebody then actually talk. An i personally don't have time to waste on it. An what do you mean joke??? Because i dont see how its funny. Its more like someone is taking a word and turning it into a negative. A word people use to idetify themselves with. So now am i a stupid gay...? Hahaha no.... How about we educate these people by throwing them a dictionary?
    Another appeal to emotion here.
    And what i've said applies to you too, just because you don't think its funny does not mean they are close minded and ignorant, though im pretty sure you will assume it, which would speak more about your misanthropic mindset than it does about them.

    And btw being ignorant is different from being an edge lord. 
     Seriously trying to justify something that is wrong? If something bothers me i will speak up. Its not being sensitive its called speaking my mind. Ive delt with people like you. An im done entertaining you. 
    Congratulations, you failed to read. 
    There is no thing as universal wrong when it comes to jokes, its highly context related, especially regarding who the audience of the joke is. And if you saw the thread in entirety then you'd know that i said that actual homophobic attacks should be banned so get out of here if you don't even know what the conversation you mixed yourself in is about.
    I know what this thread is about. Read the comments. Saw something someone said and commented. Saying thats gay isnt a joke...  Maybe you should be the one leaving. Your always getting into arguemnts with people on here. Your toxic bro. 
    Gay can be the punchline of a joke, its all up to context and the nature of the joke itself (which does not necessarily have any negative connotations), your perspective does not change what the joke was objectively. 

    Im not having arguments all the time btw, most are just conversations.
    And if getting into arguments is what makes me toxic, you should have a look at track record of @Orion btw.
     Alright chester ill meet you halfway an agree that saying thats gay can be used as a joke. Distasteful to some but still anything can be a joke. An yea it can be negative. With jokes somethimes there is a thin line that goes from funny to not funny. An what joke? You mean the guy was just trying to get a rise out of me? Was there a joke?I didnt see a joke. 
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • lasombra1979 said:

    @sadmuffins13 said:
    ChesterTheMolester said:


    sadmuffins13 said:


    ChesterTheMolester said:


    sadmuffins13 said:


    Gorgonia said:

    W> @ChesterTheMolester said:

    Gorgonia said:u

    ChesterTheMolester said:



Gorgonia said:



Orion said:

@Gorgonia said:

I never said they shouldn’t? I’m talking about when they use gay as in “man, that’s gay” (?

That doesn’t make people ######### unless they go overboard about it knowing it can alter someone else’s peace of mind.



I never said you never said they shouldn't. I said that you should speak for yourself instead of projecting, in your words, your "over sensitive" nature to the entire LGBT community.



I think I mentioned I never felt oppressed due to my sexuality? I’m not over sensitive myself but many of my friends are and sometimes they react badly towards unintended offenses or jokes coming from people that ignore what being gay is and how gay people feel when their sexuality/orientation is used as a joke. Not justifying them, just saying that before we get mad we need to try and educate those people.

Sorry but you contradict yourself there, you say its unintended that means there is no offense given, yet claim you don't justify that as if there was a crime.

Given that its unintended, they may need to learn to differentiate between the two, because emotions don't justify actions, no matter if you are gay or misinterpreted a joke. They are after all responsible for their own behavior. 

I’m saying that I’m not justifying the joke or the offense based on their ignorance or lack of intention. How is that contradictory? And how is an unintended action with a negative consequence not an offense? Negligence does have a consequence, legally.

    Correct me if I read your response incorrectly

    Im not talking legal term, and i haven't said there was no offense, there was no offense GIVEN. Huge distinction. If someone takes offense and reacts "badly", and the result is something unethical, then its all on the one who has taken the offense , in this case the gay. Saying that just because someone is LGBT he is not in control over his emotion is not only ridiculous but attacks their agency in return.

    Okay, I think I know where the confusion is.

    Someone feels offended by a joke and gets mad. Offender doesn’t know he is provoking this.

    I said I don’t justify the offender because of his negligence, I also said that instead of getting mad at them I would rather educate them.

    Unfortunately some people dont want to be educated. They are close minded an ignorant. Until they go through a similiar situation it means nothing to them. People would rather provoke and get a rise out of somebody then actually talk. An i personally don't have time to waste on it. An what do you mean joke??? Because i dont see how its funny. Its more like someone is taking a word and turning it into a negative. A word people use to idetify themselves with. So now am i a stupid gay...? Hahaha no.... How about we educate these people by throwing them a dictionary?

    Another appeal to emotion here.
    And what i've said applies to you too, just because you don't think its funny does not mean they are close minded and ignorant, though im pretty sure you will assume it, which would speak more about your misanthropic mindset than it does about them.

    And btw being ignorant is different from being an edge lord. 

     Seriously trying to justify something that is wrong? If something bothers me i will speak up. Its not being sensitive its called speaking my mind. Ive delt with people like you. An im done entertaining you. 

    Congratulations, you failed to read. 
    There is no thing as universal wrong when it comes to jokes, its highly context related, especially regarding who the audience of the joke is. And if you saw the thread in entirety then you'd know that i said that actual homophobic attacks should be banned so get out of here if you don't even know what the conversation you mixed yourself in is about.

    I know what this thread is about. Read the comments. Saw something someone said and commented. Saying thats gay isnt a joke...  Maybe you should be the one leaving. Your always getting into arguemnts with people on here. Your toxic bro. 

    Guess what, to many people, including a good amount in the LGBT+ community, "that's gay" is a joke. They take it as a joke. They do not get offended by the joke.

    @ChesterTheMolester is one of the less toxic members of this forum. The fact you call him toxic because he does not agree with your point of view is bad form. Your....I mean you're way off base attacking him.

    I undertsand what your saying. But there not using it in that context. They are using gay as stupid. I knows gays call each other gay because they are being to fem sometimes but not to say your stupid. 
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • George_Soros said:

    @sadmuffins13 said:
    Gorgonia said:

    W> @ChesterTheMolester said:

    Gorgonia said:u

    ChesterTheMolester said:



Gorgonia said:



Orion said:

@Gorgonia said:

I never said they shouldn’t? I’m talking about when they use gay as in “man, that’s gay” (?

That doesn’t make people ######### unless they go overboard about it knowing it can alter someone else’s peace of mind.



I never said you never said they shouldn't. I said that you should speak for yourself instead of projecting, in your words, your "over sensitive" nature to the entire LGBT community.



I think I mentioned I never felt oppressed due to my sexuality? I’m not over sensitive myself but many of my friends are and sometimes they react badly towards unintended offenses or jokes coming from people that ignore what being gay is and how gay people feel when their sexuality/orientation is used as a joke. Not justifying them, just saying that before we get mad we need to try and educate those people.

Sorry but you contradict yourself there, you say its unintended that means there is no offense given, yet claim you don't justify that as if there was a crime.

Given that its unintended, they may need to learn to differentiate between the two, because emotions don't justify actions, no matter if you are gay or misinterpreted a joke. They are after all responsible for their own behavior. 

I’m saying that I’m not justifying the joke or the offense based on their ignorance or lack of intention. How is that contradictory? And how is an unintended action with a negative consequence not an offense? Negligence does have a consequence, legally.

    Correct me if I read your response incorrectly

    Im not talking legal term, and i haven't said there was no offense, there was no offense GIVEN. Huge distinction. If someone takes offense and reacts "badly", and the result is something unethical, then its all on the one who has taken the offense , in this case the gay. Saying that just because someone is LGBT he is not in control over his emotion is not only ridiculous but attacks their agency in return.

    Okay, I think I know where the confusion is.

    Someone feels offended by a joke and gets mad. Offender doesn’t know he is provoking this.

    I said I don’t justify the offender because of his negligence, I also said that instead of getting mad at them I would rather educate them.

    Unfortunately some people dont want to be educated. They are close minded an ignorant. Until they go through a similiar situation it means nothing to them. People would rather provoke and get a rise out of somebody then actually talk. An i personally don't have time to waste on it. An what do you mean joke??? Because i dont see how its funny. Its more like someone is taking a word and turning it into a negative. A word people use to idetify themselves with. So now am i a stupid gay...? Hahaha no.... How about we educate these people by throwing them a dictionary?

    And don't forget, "educate" sounds rather condescending. It suggests you assume you know better. What if the offender genuinely dislikes a certain type or group of people? Say, gay people, just to stick to the "homophobic" topic. It's quite common that straight people feel deeply disgusted by homosexual activities. Especially men kissing. (Which is gross btw).

    How do you propose to "educate" them, considering that, one: it's more of an instinct based reaction, than a clearly articulated moral standpoint. Two: it's VERY difficult and indeed rude to assume, prior to any dialogue, that you know better than the other, that you have the moral high ground? (This question mostly goes to you, @Gorgonia )

    There actually are valid arguments that support the view that, say, homosexuality is, to some extent, a morally questionable choice. A lot can be said AGAINST this view as well, and no one should force you to accept any of it. But trying to "educate" someone whose views you don't even know can only come across as smug and it probably kills any chance of reasonable dialogue.

    You could have said your peace without saying two men kissing is gross... I could say the same about a man and women kissing since it does not appeal to me. Coming across as smug lol. I never force what i believe on to someone. Like i said to the other guys ..its his life. But if someone is gonna express their opinon so will i. 
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    Gorgonia said:

    W> @ChesterTheMolester said:

    Gorgonia said:u


    ChesterTheMolester said:


    Gorgonia said:


    Orion said:

    @Gorgonia said:

    I never said they shouldn’t? I’m talking about when they use gay as in “man, that’s gay” (?

    That doesn’t make people ######### unless they go overboard about it knowing it can alter someone else’s peace of mind.

    I never said you never said they shouldn't. I said that you should speak for yourself instead of projecting, in your words, your "over sensitive" nature to the entire LGBT community.

    I think I mentioned I never felt oppressed due to my sexuality? I’m not over sensitive myself but many of my friends are and sometimes they react badly towards unintended offenses or jokes coming from people that ignore what being gay is and how gay people feel when their sexuality/orientation is used as a joke. Not justifying them, just saying that before we get mad we need to try and educate those people.

    Sorry but you contradict yourself there, you say its unintended that means there is no offense given, yet claim you don't justify that as if there was a crime.

    Given that its unintended, they may need to learn to differentiate between the two, because emotions don't justify actions, no matter if you are gay or misinterpreted a joke. They are after all responsible for their own behavior. 

    I’m saying that I’m not justifying the joke or the offense based on their ignorance or lack of intention. How is that contradictory? And how is an unintended action with a negative consequence not an offense? Negligence does have a consequence, legally.
    Correct me if I read your response incorrectly

    Im not talking legal term, and i haven't said there was no offense, there was no offense GIVEN. Huge distinction. If someone takes offense and reacts "badly", and the result is something unethical, then its all on the one who has taken the offense , in this case the gay. Saying that just because someone is LGBT he is not in control over his emotion is not only ridiculous but attacks their agency in return.

    Okay, I think I know where the confusion is.

    Someone feels offended by a joke and gets mad. Offender doesn’t know he is provoking this.
    I said I don’t justify the offender because of his negligence, I also said that instead of getting mad at them I would rather educate them.

    Unfortunately some people dont want to be educated. They are close minded an ignorant. Until they go through a similiar situation it means nothing to them. People would rather provoke and get a rise out of somebody then actually talk. An i personally don't have time to waste on it. An what do you mean joke??? Because i dont see how its funny. Its more like someone is taking a word and turning it into a negative. A word people use to idetify themselves with. So now am i a stupid gay...? Hahaha no.... How about we educate these people by throwing them a dictionary?
    Another appeal to emotion here.
    And what i've said applies to you too, just because you don't think its funny does not mean they are close minded and ignorant, though im pretty sure you will assume it, which would speak more about your misanthropic mindset than it does about them.

    And btw being ignorant is different from being an edge lord. 
     Seriously trying to justify something that is wrong? If something bothers me i will speak up. Its not being sensitive its called speaking my mind. Ive delt with people like you. An im done entertaining you. 
    Congratulations, you failed to read. 
    There is no thing as universal wrong when it comes to jokes, its highly context related, especially regarding who the audience of the joke is. And if you saw the thread in entirety then you'd know that i said that actual homophobic attacks should be banned so get out of here if you don't even know what the conversation you mixed yourself in is about.
    I know what this thread is about. Read the comments. Saw something someone said and commented. Saying thats gay isnt a joke...  Maybe you should be the one leaving. Your always getting into arguemnts with people on here. Your toxic bro. 
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • ChesterTheMolester said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    Gorgonia said:

    W> @ChesterTheMolester said:

    Gorgonia said:u


    ChesterTheMolester said:


    Gorgonia said:


    Orion said:

    @Gorgonia said:

    I never said they shouldn’t? I’m talking about when they use gay as in “man, that’s gay” (?

    That doesn’t make people ######### unless they go overboard about it knowing it can alter someone else’s peace of mind.

    I never said you never said they shouldn't. I said that you should speak for yourself instead of projecting, in your words, your "over sensitive" nature to the entire LGBT community.

    I think I mentioned I never felt oppressed due to my sexuality? I’m not over sensitive myself but many of my friends are and sometimes they react badly towards unintended offenses or jokes coming from people that ignore what being gay is and how gay people feel when their sexuality/orientation is used as a joke. Not justifying them, just saying that before we get mad we need to try and educate those people.

    Sorry but you contradict yourself there, you say its unintended that means there is no offense given, yet claim you don't justify that as if there was a crime.

    Given that its unintended, they may need to learn to differentiate between the two, because emotions don't justify actions, no matter if you are gay or misinterpreted a joke. They are after all responsible for their own behavior. 

    I’m saying that I’m not justifying the joke or the offense based on their ignorance or lack of intention. How is that contradictory? And how is an unintended action with a negative consequence not an offense? Negligence does have a consequence, legally.
    Correct me if I read your response incorrectly

    Im not talking legal term, and i haven't said there was no offense, there was no offense GIVEN. Huge distinction. If someone takes offense and reacts "badly", and the result is something unethical, then its all on the one who has taken the offense , in this case the gay. Saying that just because someone is LGBT he is not in control over his emotion is not only ridiculous but attacks their agency in return.

    Okay, I think I know where the confusion is.

    Someone feels offended by a joke and gets mad. Offender doesn’t know he is provoking this.
    I said I don’t justify the offender because of his negligence, I also said that instead of getting mad at them I would rather educate them.

    Unfortunately some people dont want to be educated. They are close minded an ignorant. Until they go through a similiar situation it means nothing to them. People would rather provoke and get a rise out of somebody then actually talk. An i personally don't have time to waste on it. An what do you mean joke??? Because i dont see how its funny. Its more like someone is taking a word and turning it into a negative. A word people use to idetify themselves with. So now am i a stupid gay...? Hahaha no.... How about we educate these people by throwing them a dictionary?
    Another appeal to emotion here.
    And what i've said applies to you too, just because you don't think its funny does not mean they are close minded and ignorant, though im pretty sure you will assume it, which would speak more about your misanthropic mindset than it does about them.

    And btw being ignorant is different from being an edge lord. 
     Seriously trying to justify something that is wrong? If something bothers me i will speak up. Its not being sensitive its called speaking my mind. Ive delt with people like you. An im done entertaining you. 
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Gorgonia said:

    W> @ChesterTheMolester said:

    Gorgonia said:u


    ChesterTheMolester said:


    Gorgonia said:


    Orion said:

    @Gorgonia said:

    I never said they shouldn’t? I’m talking about when they use gay as in “man, that’s gay” (?

    That doesn’t make people ######### unless they go overboard about it knowing it can alter someone else’s peace of mind.

    I never said you never said they shouldn't. I said that you should speak for yourself instead of projecting, in your words, your "over sensitive" nature to the entire LGBT community.

    I think I mentioned I never felt oppressed due to my sexuality? I’m not over sensitive myself but many of my friends are and sometimes they react badly towards unintended offenses or jokes coming from people that ignore what being gay is and how gay people feel when their sexuality/orientation is used as a joke. Not justifying them, just saying that before we get mad we need to try and educate those people.

    Sorry but you contradict yourself there, you say its unintended that means there is no offense given, yet claim you don't justify that as if there was a crime.

    Given that its unintended, they may need to learn to differentiate between the two, because emotions don't justify actions, no matter if you are gay or misinterpreted a joke. They are after all responsible for their own behavior. 

    I’m saying that I’m not justifying the joke or the offense based on their ignorance or lack of intention. How is that contradictory? And how is an unintended action with a negative consequence not an offense? Negligence does have a consequence, legally.
    Correct me if I read your response incorrectly

    Im not talking legal term, and i haven't said there was no offense, there was no offense GIVEN. Huge distinction. If someone takes offense and reacts "badly", and the result is something unethical, then its all on the one who has taken the offense , in this case the gay. Saying that just because someone is LGBT he is not in control over his emotion is not only ridiculous but attacks their agency in return.

    Okay, I think I know where the confusion is.

    Someone feels offended by a joke and gets mad. Offender doesn’t know he is provoking this.
    I said I don’t justify the offender because of his negligence, I also said that instead of getting mad at them I would rather educate them.

    Unfortunately some people dont want to be educated. They are close minded an ignorant. Until they go through a similiar situation it means nothing to them. People would rather provoke and get a rise out of somebody then actually talk. An i personally don't have time to waste on it. An what do you mean joke??? Because i dont see how its funny. Its more like someone is taking a word and turning it into a negative. A word people use to idetify themselves with. So now am i a stupid gay...? Hahaha no.... How about we educate these people by throwing them a dictionary?
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • George_Soros said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    George_Soros said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    George_Soros said:

    @sadmuffins13 said:
    I dont have tolerance for people who say your gay and they mean your stupid. Just say your stupid. Black people dont like like the n word. Gays dont like the f word . like you can insult someone in so many way but choose to use sexual orientation as an insult? Pathetic...

    I love using "gay" not so much as a serious insult, but as something lame, stupid, questionable. You know: not something that's completely wrong, just... not quite right.

    This has to be bait right? Lmao so why not just say thats lame or stupid or questionable? Its people like you that hinder progession for equality. You look at it as something small but in reality its that type of thinking that has spread ignorance . Gay means happy if anything. So using it in that context is wrong...
    Yeah it is bait. But it's also true. And it's not wrong to use it in that context. Language is based on consensus, and this word is quite widely used in this sense. Like, "I don't know man, farming is kinda gay."
    It is wrong an if you cant see that then idk what to tell you. 
    Can you explain why? (I assume you mean it's morally wrong somehow, not grammatically.) It's just another word expressing disapproval.
    You know its wrong in both cases. The word in no way means disapproval. You literally said your last post was bait so i cant even take you seriously anymore. I think im just more in shock im having this convo. Im assuming your straight an have no idea of the struggle in the lgbtq community. An youll probably say i have a gay friend which somehow makes you think its ok. At the end of the day its your life you will say and do as you please. Just stop being toxic and trying to get attention.
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • George_Soros said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    George_Soros said:

    @sadmuffins13 said:
    I dont have tolerance for people who say your gay and they mean your stupid. Just say your stupid. Black people dont like like the n word. Gays dont like the f word . like you can insult someone in so many way but choose to use sexual orientation as an insult? Pathetic...

    I love using "gay" not so much as a serious insult, but as something lame, stupid, questionable. You know: not something that's completely wrong, just... not quite right.

    This has to be bait right? Lmao so why not just say thats lame or stupid or questionable? Its people like you that hinder progession for equality. You look at it as something small but in reality its that type of thinking that has spread ignorance . Gay means happy if anything. So using it in that context is wrong...
    Yeah it is bait. But it's also true. And it's not wrong to use it in that context. Language is based on consensus, and this word is quite widely used in this sense. Like, "I don't know man, farming is kinda gay."
    It is wrong an if you cant see that then idk what to tell you. 
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • George_Soros said:

    @sadmuffins13 said:
    I dont have tolerance for people who say your gay and they mean your stupid. Just say your stupid. Black people dont like like the n word. Gays dont like the f word . like you can insult someone in so many way but choose to use sexual orientation as an insult? Pathetic...

    I love using "gay" not so much as a serious insult, but as something lame, stupid, questionable. You know: not something that's completely wrong, just... not quite right.

    This has to be bait right? Lmao so why not just say thats lame or stupid or questionable? Its people like you that hinder progession for equality. You look at it as something small but in reality its that type of thinking that has spread ignorance . Gay means happy if anything. So using it in that context is wrong...
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • I dont have tolerance for people who say your gay and they mean your stupid. Just say your stupid. Black people dont like like the n word. Gays dont like the f word . like you can insult someone in so many way but choose to use sexual orientation as an insult? Pathetic...
    in Homophobic slurs aren’t bannable?!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • NoodleLegs said:
    I think is is a beautiful thread because it's nice and polite and no one is criticizing the original poster for playing on PS4. Personally, I also play Spirit but I also want to be good at the Nurse. So, this thread's in my favourites.
    Literally posted something like this a couple days ago. All i got was a get good lol... Finding good people in this community is like finding a needle in a haystack. Good luck meg with the nurse!!
    in Any Nurse main tips for console? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • The spirit and fengs outfit look amazing .This is what ive been waiting for!! Thank YOU DEVS!!
    in New Outfits In the PTB. Chines New Year, Valentine, School Girl, and More Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Lol
    in Funny DbD Images! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Im honestly surprised with the amount of people who play hag and said she is in a good spot.  Its honestly refreshing to see people enjoy the hag. I dont go againsts her often. An i dont see people using her cosmetics when i do. The photosynthesis outfit is amazing def worth the money imo. But ill just say this one more time. Collsion with teleport??? I needs it lol. Thanks everyone for sharing your opinions. Happy holidays!!
    in Hag buff?? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Vietfox said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    Vietfox said:
    Hag main here.
    No, she is in a really good spot and doesn't need a buff at all. She might have just a few good addons, but she doesn't need them to do well tbh.
    What are your favorite add ons to use on her?
    Mint rag is fun, but i usually use bloodied mud and dried cicada.
    I use the dried cicada alot to. I actually enjoy the pussy willow just for the aura reading. 
    in Hag buff?? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Vietfox said:
    Hag main here.
    No, she is in a really good spot and doesn't need a buff at all. She might have just a few good addons, but she doesn't need them to do well tbh.
    What are your favorite add ons to use on her?
    in Hag buff?? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Divinitye9 said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    To everyone who thought this was bait no this is not. Just me expressing my opinion. The hag is so much fun to play with but against a good team can have trouble. 
    That’s true for everyone. A very good group of survivors can take down tough killers if their cards are played right. 

    Hag is in a fantastic spot. Perhaps you need to change your play style or perk selection? How well do you generally do? What are you having trouble with? “Good groups” don’t tell us much... there are enough of us killer and hag mains to give pointers. Just saying “good group beat me buff hag plz” won’t get you anything but flak.
    I never said a good group beat me so buff hag please... I can take my loss. I just felt with all the buffs and debuffs going on maybe the hag could use a little adjustments. I try switch up my perks to see what works. My playstyle depends on the killer im using. With hag i know what im doing. I rank up no problem. I know my loops and all about 360s . i just want her traps to have collision already .
    in Hag buff?? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Theluckyboi said:

    For the love of god almighty please tell me this is bait.

    Why would i create something to bait people? I created this disscussion to see others opinions. An clearly you posted this to be funny but instead added nothing to the discussion. So unless you have something to add keep that toxic behavior away from me. 
    in Hag buff?? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • To everyone who thought this was bait no this is not. Just me expressing my opinion. The hag is so much fun to play with but against a good team can have trouble. 
    in Hag buff?? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • If the killer is camping you punish them with a gen rush. That’s the counter play. To many times I see survivors try to risk their lives and pay for it. Like if it’s leatherface you know there is a high chance your being camped so be prepared LOL. If I camp it’s because I would like to solidify one sacrifice if I had a bad game or if I was dealing with a really toxic survivor. 
    in Who started to camp more? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • I was also thinking of the map add on that shines a ray of light only the survivor's can see. May the light protect us. 
    in Is the entity weak to light? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Plu said:

    It's not on PC either, i guess they'll release it when the winter event drop

    Thank you for answering so quickly.
    in The legion´s frosty eyes is only for pc? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Master said:

    Console or PC?

    Console
    in Crashing? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • iTz_KilLaZ_x said:
    Nice bait mate. Continue supporting poor game design and lazy development. I’m sure that’ll really help the games lifespan lol
    Someone is bitter. Keep that negativity out of here. 
    in The Legion( Best killer IMO) Comment by sadmuffins13
  • I feel the same way about the spirit. She has the same speed as the legion but just feels faster when i play her. 
    in A question of Legion's speed. Comment by sadmuffins13
  • RSB said:

    They are probably R1 SWF players carrying their R20 friends. Normally it would put them with the R20 killers, so R1 survivors can smurf, but sadly (for them) this does not always work.

    Ive had some games where there were not any red rank survivors. My first assumption was swf ..if that was the case communcation was not good then lol. 
    in Low rank survivors? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • If i had to pick a hex perk i usually pick devour hope. It forces me not to camp. An i get rewarded for it. If im running devour hope on spirit usually my totem doesnt get touched until its to late. Silly survivor's think its haunted grounds lol. 
    in RUIN is crutch? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • First game of the night got camped by leather face. Welcome to the fog lol.
    in When will camping be unfair? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • The hag and huntress. The hag doesnt just use that claw for killing. 😉 lol
    in Who do you think would ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) first? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Update you can cancel it just hit the button to run lol. I was about to say. You can cancel healing in the injured state but not dying? Would have have been weird. 
    in Can you cancel a heal in the dying state? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • The_Crusader said:
    Sadly not.

    I get people who purposefully fail skill checks so the killer can find me.
    Thank you for responding so quickly. An im sorry that happened to you..  
    in Can you cancel a heal in the dying state? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • I actually carried a survivor to the hatch because someone quit today .Didnt think they deserved to suffer because of someone else rage quiting .
    in When do you show mercy to a survivor and let them live? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Nahh i dont have one. 
    in Invisible pallets? Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Yeaa me to..
    in May the Hallowed Blight commence!!! Comment by sadmuffins13
  • Lowbei said:
    sadmuffins13 said:
    I play on ps4 and have seen people with this costume. There has to be a way.
    no, you havent
    Uhmm how are you gonna tell me what i saw???
    in How do you unlock legacy skins? (if possible on console) Comment by sadmuffins13
  • I play on ps4 and have seen people with this costume. There has to be a way.
    in How do you unlock legacy skins? (if possible on console) Comment by sadmuffins13
‹ 1 2
Avatar