SCP_FOR_DBD
SCP_FOR_DBD
About
- Username
- SCP_FOR_DBD
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1478279#Comment_1478279
You can hate the human but love the art, I'm telling you lad, there is not one single old time artist, or widely acclaimed human in history that did no wrong. Ghandi ? Was actually terribly mysoginistic and racist. The Greeks, we owe them a lot for our modern world and culture, yet they were pedophiles. If you were to stop appreciating anything done by bad people you'd just hate everything.
I know, It still sucks though. Not to mention the fact he was a massive racist even for his time.
-
@EvilJoshy said:
I vote Nyarlathotep. He isn't massive like Cthulhu and he tends to interact with humans the most out of Lovecraft's Old Ones.
Isn't this how hes normally depicted?
Hes pretty massive, the devs could size him down though.
-
Mate, she did the optimal play. Let them crawl to the gate. How exactly she manged to unhook and get past you I have no idea.
-
I feel like the power is too simple, they could do tons with a xeno and its one ability is just basically a retooled wraith? Not to mention nesting grounds is basically just a free kill if the killer camps.
-
I'm split. On one hand, I ######### hate lovecraft as a person. On the other hand, his mythos is cool as hell.
-
@CaptainRaider said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1436081#Comment_1436081
Thanks! Though you don’t think it would be too OP if the already guaranteed gen and heal skill checks are present with a guaranteed already small skill check being smaller?
Thats true, I just hate chance.
-
Assuming everyones running sweat builds, it depends on whether its SWF.
-
Bill, I'm a sucker for L4D.
-
@NekoGamerX said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1477312#Comment_1477312
Until Dawn is also a sony exclusive
Thats true, it wouldn't be as big a deal if it was a skin though.
-
DBD isnt really gory, having a character with tons of differences from the rest of the cast doesn't make much sense. Not to mention it doesn't have much fan support.
-
Isn't TLOU PS exclusive? They'd have to make quite the deal to get the chapter on Xbox, PC, and Switch. Until Dawn could work, but I think a skin for hag might be better, thats just me though. I like the idea of FNAF, but perhaps they could make it 1 killer and a map instead of a full blown chapter. Because lets be honest, FNAF doesn't really need a survivor. This is all just my opinion though. I don't know enough about Outlast to say anything on it.
-
@Veen said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475838#Comment_1475838
Professional analyst here, a random sample isn't statistics, your sample have to have votes from specific persons, not just some random people in a forum sometimes killer biaised.
Your poll would be more representative if you had equal part of survivor mains, killers mains and vers players as voters. Your results are just crude lies.
Ive already explained I was drunk and apologized for it, what more do you want from me?
-
It seems to me that its just not something they made, there are no rules for it they just haven't.
-
Ghostface, its so much fun to mindgame survivors. Pig is a close second, on the rare occasion the trap kills someone I feel validated.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476209#Comment_1476209
I think it doesn't need changes for gens.
You can do swing (dont be close to the survivor so the game doesn't grab the survivor) and slug him, but locker DS has no counter, but anyways i'd rather eat the ds, they're going to be in the floor again in 15s lmao.
I think you should just ignore them, they're really anooying and toxic, they just seek for attention, everytime I see a "COVID-19 vaccine has a chip so bill gates can control us" i laugh out loud 😂, they just seek for attention that's all what they want, hopefully oxford vaccine will help us to end this pandemic once and for all.
And dont worry, people on internet are really rude, a lot of them are just salty kids, if they insult you just leave the discussion (that's what I do) they suffer more when you don't pay attention to them.
I reccomend you to watch some series on netflix, there are a loot of good series!
My fav series are:
El Final del Paraiso: As the new DEA director in Colombia, Catalina Santana will have to deal with a dangerous gang of drug traffickers, as she faces demons who threaten to destroy her family. (You should watch sin senos si hay paraiso so you can understand this season)
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/M9JIYDL6KR8P/image.png
Control Z: After a hacker begins to expose the secrets of the students of the National College in front of the entire school, the distant and observant Sofia sets out to discover her identity.
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/1XPAM4F3DBMI/image.png
La reina del flow: Yeimy Montoya pays an unfair sentence in New York after being deceived by the man she loved. Therefore, he makes a pact with the judicial authorities to capture the man who murdered his family. (This is a really good serie) btw srry for the low quality pic, it is actually high res but it seems like a forum issue
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/D0DCHABOXR3D/image.png
Stranger things, but I think everyone knows this serie lol
Thats fair, I just hate the fact survivors do gens right next to you, so you slug them and 30 seconds later they're back up and the gen is done. But I can't even leave rank 6, so its probably on me. Thanks for the suggestions! I have seen the first season of Stranger Things (It was so good, I'm glad its in DBD), and my sister is a massive fan of Control Z. I haven't heard of either of the other shows, unfortunately I don't currently have a netflix subscribtion. Covid has been a #########, if I get the money for it I will definitely check those out! I'll probably leave sluzzy depending on how he responds to my followup.
-
@Sluzzy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476192#Comment_1476192
We know dinosaurs exists because of hard facts, being fossils. However, knowing the "precise" temperature of the atmosphere across that entire timeline is impossible. They can estimate and they know from studying the surface that there has been periods of warming and cooling and humans have only been here a tiny part of that history. My point is they can't prove humans is causing global warming. We can't even predict the path of a hurricane with 100% accuracy, we certainly don't know everything about the highest parts of the atmosphere when we can't even predict the lower part of it.
We know based on the animals tolerance at the time plus the stuff you yourself have said proved the earth cooled and warmed, Not to mention the fact you still haven't provided a source nor have you disproven NASA.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476182#Comment_1476182
Dont worry, we're all here to help us each other, DS needs a change, which is to deactivate in lockers, that's the only change I think it needs IMO, it doesn't bother me as a killer but I see why.
And are you talking about sluzzy? oh well, I need to analize his comments but right now I'm going into a virtual class, so I'll see what I can do.
All I can say, thank you for being mature and accept that you're wrong, a lot of people on the forums are unable to do that
Yeah, I feel like DS could use some changes, mostly for lockers and gens.
As for sluzzy, I've got into a fight with 3 anti vaxxers yesterday (2 of them were family members), I'm a little tired of arguing with people like that.
Thanks for being so understanding! Most of the time I get called any number of things, none of them are very kind.
-
If we can have a gunslinger from the Wild West, A priestess from Ancient Egypt, and A Samurai from Feudal Japan, We can have a Knight from Medieval Times.
-
@Sluzzy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476082#Comment_1476082
That is a biased site with an agenda. How would they know or prove that humans are emitting more gases than what the Earth is naturally producing? Records have only been studied for about 100 years. It is estimated Earth is 4.5 billion years old. There could have been millions of times when it was a lot hotter than it is today!
Same way we know dinosaurs existed. Same way we know anything old that isn't around now existed. If you want proper facts, heres NASA. Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
If you can give me something without an agenda and with more credibility than ######### NASA, I might entertain your beliefs.
-
@Khakuate said:
Looks like my comment didn't get approved, so i'll just say this:
I'll do a survey to 100 people. All of them are biased to the red color.
I'll ask them they're favorite color, they're obviously going to answer red.
So now I should pretend EVERYONE likes the red color and is their favorite color?
See why your argument is wrong?
Sorry your edit didn't get approved. While your situation isn't a perfect example of what my poll is (It assumes everyone is biased towards one, mine had a similar problem, not to the same extent.) i see the problem with my reasoning. I was a little tipsy and got into an argument with my mates, they sprayed me with a hose, that seems to have cured it. Sorry for my stubbornness. On a different note, can you help me with this anti global warming guy? Since you are far better at this than me.
-
@Pryzm said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/174835/why-hasnt-ds-been-nerfed
DS is a joke of what it once was. It used to be that DS gave an entire team immunity in the beginning of the game. They did not have to be hooked, it was without a time limit. They could skip using it and save it and save it if they wanted to. Nothing like eating 4 DS before the first hook and having 1 gen left.
DS is fine as is. The only tweak it may need is to deactivate when inside the locker.
Thats kinda what I'm looking for, nothing huge. Just a few small nerfs that make it less abuseable.
-
@Sluzzy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476046#Comment_1476046
Not man-made global warming, but the Earth naturally has periods of warming and cooling.
https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/articles/five-common-claims-made-by-climate-change-skeptics?gclid=CjwKCAjwsO_4BRBBEiwAyagRTVBbFrOCMSQnv-Kteo8Ws0o4FNN0ZdivjQNUXGJY1XcX4sFla955VRoCTrIQAvD_BwE (Fact 2 has your answer)
-
That has 4 categories, and is much wider of a pool. Mix that in with party bias "Different from killer/survivor bias" and you have a different situation.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1476042#Comment_1476042
"the poll is an indication of what the majority thinks"
Yet you're back at it... dude I already told you why this is wrong, yet you just ignore it or dont adress it, if you're not going to adress my points, then im sorry but i'll be forced to leave.
You are revolving around a conspiracy / assumption that could be like this or not, it is a 50/50, what you could not understand is that this does not apply to games ..
Right now there are 29,151 people playing, you cannot say that just because 45 people said that DS needs changes, the rest think the same, when it is not, it is only a conspiracy.
You still ignore what I have to say. I already stated why the 45 votes matters to it. I controlled for variables to get the farthest of each situation. Yet here you are, still claiming all I'm saying is "duh 45 people mean majority", the difference between my views and yours is that my views are backed by science. You have yet to address my points either. "Similar to how 100 people is normally a sample size used to demonstrate the common populations ideals in the real world, if 100 can be used as a stand in for 7.8 billion people, why can't 64 be used as a stand in for 35,019 people? And I am not saying 34,955 people are asking for it to be changed, how you got that statistic I don't know."
-
@Sluzzy said:
Everyone use to talk about global warming too, and said Barrack Obama becoming the first black president would end the racial divide once and for all. Look at us today. A country falling apart and global warming didn't exist, and buildings being burned to the ground and innocent white people shot in the streets because "everyone is talking about" how racist the most free country on the planet is. "Everyone" is not always right.
DS is a drop in the bucket to what a killer can bring in a match, whether it be a killer with broken hitboxes or unfair perk combinations.
I know this. Killers love to tunnel and DS is standing in their way. They also love to decimate a team to feed the ego and DS says "not today Charlie". If killers can equip oppressive loadouts, then survivors should have methods of defense and DS doesn't even cut the mustard.
Wait, you don't seriously think global warming doesn't exist do you?
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475994#Comment_1475994
A lot of time, search it on google.
" at this time the post has 238 views, you have 20 upvotes at this time, this does not account for the potential of someone liking multiple comments at a time."
Using your logic, your poll had 174 views and only 45 people think DS should be nerfed.
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/NZTLND5XGSV0/image.png
And the difference is, that variables apply to your poll too, and we can't balance the game around 45 people. That is obvious, if you dont realize this then you're blind.
And no, polls are not reliable, remember when a lot of posters predicted that Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 election? You already know what happend.
So dont pretend that only because 45 people think DS needs to be nerfed, 34,955 thinks it should too, no one knows what is going to happen.
And even then, back to the kill rates, if plague ever gets nerfed, that's not healthy for game and balance, and this pretty obvious, thanks god devs dont do polls on this game, so basically this discussion is pointless cause devs dont listen to this.
Science can not by definition be wrong, either some unknown variable is changing science, or the science was based in fallacy and should not have been considered science in the first place. The 2016 polls were technically right, Hillary got more votes, from what I can tell they didn't account for the electoral college. You keep confusing what I'm saying, the poll is an indication of what the majority thinks. Its not 100% accurate (Thats why I keep adding/ditching 20%) Those 64 people are stand ins for the game community. Similar to how 100 people is normally a sample size used to demonstrate the common populations ideals in the real world, if 100 can be used as a stand in for 7.8 billion people, why can't 64 be used as a stand in for 35,019 people? And I am not saying 34,955 people are asking for it to be changed, how you got that statistic I don't know.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475943#Comment_1475943
Science is science, this is reality.
A lot of things can happen, You are assuming that half of the playerbase would vote that DS needs a nerf, I am assuming that 33,955 people would vote it doesn't. And my assumption would be as valid as yours since you never know what could happen.
I give you a lot factors yet you're ignoring them.
And this is a pointless discussion, devs never use statistic so my argument is valid and they already said it when they posted the kill rates statistic, so just a tip: dont waste your time doing polls.
Science is applied to reality, thats why we have science. Tell me one time science has been wrong. And as for the upvote argument, at this time the post has 238 views, you have 20 upvotes at this time, this does not account for the potential of someone liking multiple comments at a time. Same goes for mine. Therefore, neither can be used as a proper basis for it. Though statistics would indicate that you are more widely believed to be true, whilst I am in the minority. The difference between the devs kil statistic and my opinion is just that, one is a hard statistic taken from the game without controlling for variables. Mine is an opinion poll that has. (In case your wondering what I controlled for, that is the 20% difference that was said.) Consider this a response to the other replys you made in the time it took for me to write this = as well. This comment took a while to make. You have given a good bit too think about, thank you.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475929#Comment_1475929
So do you SERIOUSLY think we should balance around biased people? holy f...
I gave you valid arguments and you come up with this? I literally told you why statistic dont work in DBD.
You wanna know why they didn't use kill rate statistic? cause they dont know the factor, if the killer used a mori, camped, if a survivor was afk etc... theres a lot of factors and you can't balance around it.
Everyone is biased, that is how the game works. Its the bias of whether or not they think something is fair based on their own experience. You appear to confuse my usage of the word "bias", I am not using bias as in the context of bias of unfair, I am using it in the context of bias built up over playing the game. As for the kill statistic. Those are factors they create, so they have the power to change them. I never said they should change bubba based on that statistic, because they didn't control for variables.
-
@sulaiman said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475838#Comment_1475838
So, if i do a vote about you sending me 500€ every month, and i get a sample size of 100 people to vote, will you respect the result?
If you think 100 random people who know neither of us, and you don't skew the results in any way, or attempt to bias anyone in some kinda way. Sure. However, the situation you propose is whether or not I already do it. So I won't have to respect it.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475924#Comment_1475924
Majority isn't 45 people.
AS i said before 34k are currently playing, 45 people think ds needs a nerf, what if the other 33,955 thinks it doesn't?
And we've circled right back to the exact same thing. How do we know any of your examples are truly broken then? The poll is backed by science, the recommended idea is that you have 10 voters per variable, in which case 64 should suffice. Since he poll is backed by science, it can be assumed the results are somewhat accurate (Science says that something as drastic as a 20% difference can occur, though its unlikely), in which case approximately half the playerbase would want it changed, which is still enough imo.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475917#Comment_1475917
You need to be joking at this point.
The point is, statistic doesn't prove anything on DBD cause
- There are a lot of factors
- We dont know if they're biased or not
- There's a lot more survivors than killers (4v1) so if every DBD player voted, survivors would get a lot more votes in their favor, how is that fair?
That's why I say statistic dont work on DBD
The problem with that is, the bias of the people doesn't matter, thats the point of the pole. Its the bias of the pole maker that matters and whether or not they skew the results. And DS is one specific DBD factor, therefore it can be voted on in a bubble. And yes, statistics state that there are likely to be 4x as many survivor mains as killer mains, but wouldn't that prove the point about DS needing a change? If its likely to be 4x the amount of bias towards survivors as there are killers?
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475907#Comment_1475907
The thing is, they're still here and devs dont say anything about that, so basically devs think these are fine?
As I said It is supposed to be a defensive perk with conditions and anti tunnel aspects.
What does that have to do with my post? The majority thinks DS along with your examples are not fine, so they are not fine. I focused on DS because I had a poll and just got off a game where all 4 survs had it. If I got tunneled 3 games in a row you better believe I'm gonna complain about it.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475904#Comment_1475904
No they're not, or then why didn't they nerf all killers?
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/7PDJXIE85J06/image.png
How do we exactly know that the people that are going to vote are unbiased? Oh yeah, we can't.
Does that mean old leatherface needs a nerf? he has a 70% kill rate.
Does that mean trapper needs a nerf too? No, cause statistic doesn't work with DBD.
The point of statistics is to get peoples biases. And leatherface might need a nerf depending on how the devs want to balance the game. If the game is balanced around 70% kill rate hes fine, if its balanced around 50% kill rate hes unbalanced. Same with trapper.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475887#Comment_1475887
Noed, freddy, spirit with stridor, ebony mori, iri head, deathslinger insta shoot, camping and tunneling reward stupid plays too, and yet they're still here... So?
It is supposed to be a defensive perk with conditions and anti tunnel aspects.
And when did I say those didn't need changes? Those are all BS too.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475884#Comment_1475884
We're talking about a game community my dude, not statistic.
Does that mean plague should be nerfed too? Me and a lot of other gamers find her anooying cause she doesn't let me use my medkits, is that a indication of plague being op? No.
Get a decent number of votes and we can talk about it, I repeated this a lot, 64 is nothing considering 34k people are currently playing. It isn't a indication of the "Majority" What if 33,995 think DS is fine?
Statistics is being applied to the game, thats the point of statistics. To be applied to stuff. And if you had an unbiased poll that said plague needs to be nerfed, with no invites or skewing of results, then plague would need to be nerfed. Because thats how statistics worked. You dismiss the statistic for no reason. What do you think the chances are that 70% of the people who saw that post were not just killer mains, but bad killer mains?
-
@Nicholas said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475878#Comment_1475878
You're assuming I am because you think people that favor tunneling and camping are killer mains. That's not what I was saying. I know some Survivor mains that hate both as survivors but actually engage in both while they play as The Killer because of how effective it is. Or as retaliation from them being camped or tunneled so much. You know how bad matches are when no one has DS? The Killer has free reign to insta-tunnel and delete people quickly.
I assumed it because of the comment you responded to. I'm not saying it shouldn't be anti tunnel. As a 50/50 player I am sick of being tunneled, DS is absolutely an amazing counter for it, but it can be amazing for a whole lot more, and not all of it should be rewarded.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475867#Comment_1475867
It isn't supposed to be anti tunnel, it has anti tunnel aspects and that's all.
So what else is it supposed to do? Because in its current form it rewards people for making stupid plays.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475861#Comment_1475861
I perfectly know how they work, but dont try to get a perk nerfed only because 45 people are upset about it. Dont act like if everyone wants it nerfed and dont say "Everyone" cause that's just flat out wrong.
And I think @Nicholas got this pretty clear
Statistics says a sample size like that should be a decent enough indication of the majority. Not perfect, but enough to say over half.
-
@ClickyClicky said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475786#Comment_1475786
Same applies to NOED, it’s always talked about and nerfs are always requested.
Sure, NOED also needs a nerf/rework, its annoying as hell to.
-
@Nicholas said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475863#Comment_1475863
I never said it was skewed or all killer mains, I was making the point that a survey even with lots of respondents doesn't necessarily mean it represents anything.
But your using it in the context of that. If the results weren't skewed towards anyones favor it is said to be unbiased.
-
@RoMainPuppy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475848#Comment_1475848
Slugging is also pressure, sometimes you have to slug over hooking as sometimes hooking loses you pressure. OhTofu says it himself. Slugging also forces people off objectives. Someone has to save them, someone has to get off a gen to do that. That's 2 people not doing gens. Especially if you've managed to slug them far from other survivors, that means they have to traverse the map to heal the slug, wasting even more of their time. If they use Unbreakable that means they no longer have Unbreakable, which is a good thing. Either way they're still not doing a gen or self caring in your face.
Yes, but it rewards people for making stupid plays. If you start repairing a gen like that you should be given the hardest punish there is.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475857#Comment_1475857
Pretty much this, I defend DS a lot cause when I get DS off my build, basically that's a big neon sign above my survivor head saying "tunnel me"
Sorry killers, but I dont want to be gone in less than 5 min.
The problem with DS isn't that its anti tunnel, lord knows we need a way to deal with them. The problem is that it can be abused.
-
@Nicholas said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475838#Comment_1475838
No demographics. I could survey 200 campers and they would probably unanimously agree that BT is too strong. Survey 1000 tunnelers and they would agree DS needs to be deleted. There is currently no anti-tunnel perk, DS can help with being tunneled ONCE but not much else. Tunneling is a Survivor problem, yet every complaint is about making tunneling even easier (and it's already easy and effective) and exclusively from The Killer's perspective.
What you fail to realize is that those weren't just killer mains, it was anyone on the forum.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475841#Comment_1475841
Oh look! a special snowflake...
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475838#Comment_1475838
The population? as I said before there's currently 34k people playing DBD, 45 people saying DS should be nerfed doesn't mean anything, you can't make everyone happy.
Using that logic should freddy, spirit and every other killer be nerfed too only because 70 people say they're op? NO.
Get a considerable number and we can discuss, this is just a bait thread.
Mate, do you know how statistics work? Look it up if you don't believe me. As for the clown comment, the fact you have to resort to insults instead of stating a proper point is honestly disappointing.
-
@Maperson said:
They should just disable it when survivor is doing gen, healing etc.. Bcs you are not in the chase anymore, otherwise it's fine
@ Antares2332 said:
That ability should be disabled when you touch a gen.
This^
-
@RoMainPuppy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475816#Comment_1475816
If they're slugged they're not on a gen, if they don't have Unbreakable a teammate has to get off a gen to come save them. That's potentially two people not doing gens. If you find and chase a third survivor that's 3 people not doing gens. Don't see a problem here. Or just slug all of them. Can't use DS if they haven't been hooked. If they Unbreakable slug em again, unbreakble gone.
And that is also me losing a hook, which is the fastest way to kill someone and get map pressure. Along with forcing people off objectives.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475821#Comment_1475821
So don't act as if the majority of the DBD community wants DS nerfed, when you have a considerable amount of people we could have a better discussion, but 64 people? you're just baiting at this point.
"Everyone is talking about it, it is in almost every single match. I made a poll about it, at this time 70% of the votes are for it to be nerfed."
Kekw "everyone" 😂
And clown jokes, real mature. You couldn't make it 5 posts without resorting to insults.
-
@Khakuate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475821#Comment_1475821
So don't act as if the majority of the DBD community wants DS nerfed, when you have a considerable amount of people we could have a better discussion, but 64 people? you're just baiting at this point.
"Everyone is talking about it, it is in almost every single match. I made a poll about it, at this time 70% of the votes are for it to be nerfed."
Kekw "everyone" 😂
Mate, 30 is a common sample size for how the population feels about something with 3 variables, I gave you a sample size of over 60. Your ignoring statistics.
-
@BigBrainMegMain said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1475816#Comment_1475816
If you can't hook them for a full minute you're doing it wrong.
Why are you punishing this survivor that was recently unhooked for YOUR greed?
That's my question, you're going for the unhooked survivor and expecting an easy hook, why aren't you going for someone else?
See my issue here? Your complaining about not being able to hook this survivor with DS, why are you going for this survivor instead of the other 3? You wouldn't be complaining if you weren't tunneling, you wouldn't be complaining if you weren't camping.
You wouldn't be complaining if you simple just went for another survivor instead of literally, the one you're now waiting 60 seconds to hook.
You're blaming their perk for your mistakes.
You don't see what I'm talking about. If a survivor gets unhooked and starts doing a gen, I have to stop them, when I play a killer that is my job. They have DS, meaning I can't hook them for however long they have on the timer. And since I'm not sitting there waiting for the timer to go off they are free to get up by healing or unbreakable.
-
@Squirrel_Thicc said:
It has been nerfed tho
Not enough, otherwise people wouldn't want it nerfed.