Kellie
Kellie
About
- Username
- Kellie
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@Dizzy1096 said:
Sprint burst. If you use sprint burst you can not call yourself a good player, period.
Also trying to rush a gen while you're trying to hook someone nearby, or popping a gen right in front of your face. It's tryharding and you're just forcing me to tryhard too....which is dumb because you're the one thats gonna cry I didn't play fair after the game.
Also and probably most importantly, dead hard for distance. If you're a red rank survivor you shouldn't need a crutch get out of trouble free perk. I loop killers without the training wheels.
You loop killers without training wheels because your most likely a low rank survivor facing bad killers. Also how does me using a perk make me bad at the game, because you can honestly say the same for Every perk.
-
@EvanSnowWolf said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985870#Comment_1985870
I've never been attacked by a Killer in end-game chat. Not once. Not ever. Killers simply do not spew vile comments in end-game chat with the frequency of Survivors. I believe people that anecdotally say it happens, but it's so rare it's not worth mentioning. Meanwhile, Survivor ego is so insanely out of control that their end game salt could carry an entire pretzel company and there are Youtubers that dedicate their entire channel to collecting and displaying all the insane end-game reactions they get from salty Survivors. There is no such Killer equivalent.
There is always an equivalent, both sides can be just as toxic as the other. And just because you’ve never been attacked by a killer doesn’t mean other have.
-
@Mister_Holdout said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985811#Comment_1985811
Careful, your logic doesn't fit the "survivor bad, killer good" narrative. You might get flamed by other forum users.
People have already “flamed” because I don’t fit that narrative.
-
@bjorksnas said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985863#Comment_1985863
Limit uses, such as having 3 total uses or gain 2 tokens to use it every time you get hooked and lower total exhaustion amount by a bit
remove certain parts of I-frames like no dh over traps
the perk is already way overtuned theres no need to call knocking it down a peg making it garbage when its already far and away one of the best perks in the game
Removing I-Frames basically makes the perk useless since the survivor will always get hit through it. And what’s the point of giving it three uses if it’s going to be an exhaustion perk.
-
@EvanSnowWolf said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985811#Comment_1985811
If the end-game reactions were the same, sure.
But they're not.
How can you say they're not the same when Killers can literally have an ego and make up excuses in end-game chat as well.
-
@bjorksnas said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985828#Comment_1985828
wot, if a survivor gets a free extension of their chase just abandon the entire chase, that doesn't sound like skill based gameplay to me that just sounds like dead hard is overtuned
Most things in this game aren't skill based. Also what can you do to dead hard to make it not over tuned while also making it not garbage at the same time?
-
No, I keep getting bad teammates/killers every match I play. Ever since this hot fix came out all my killers and teammates have been awful.
-
It honestly isn't much of a problem.
If a survivor dead hards to a pallet or window just abandon the chase.
-
Can't the same thing go for the entire community?
-
Just use Unbreakable, like every other survivor.
-
All survivors are doing is using what the devs are giving to them.
If you're gonna whine at least whine towards the people causing the issue.
-
I mean the only way to stay alive as a survivor is pallet looping. So if every map was a complete dead zone everything would be much easier for killer and survivors would be dropping like flies.
-
@Dizzy1096 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1985371#Comment_1985371
LOL
Bullying is a feeling not a balance thing first of all. Having 4 people all chatting and working together whose intention is not to play the game but is to ruin the game for you and make you feel miserable is bullying. It's still possible with most killers except the the ones that are really good, and even they can get tilted at times.
But it's ok because I was born into toxicity, molded by it. I can make them rage better than they can make me rage.
Okay but what is there for survivors to bully you with? Unless its a broken set up that they're using it's pretty much nonexistent. There's no pallet vacuum, less pallets spawn on the map now, there's no instant heals, no instant blinds, no more easy fast vaults, eventually there's going to be a DS and OoO nerf, theres killers that can annoy and body SWF, and on top of that they really aren't that common.
But since you think they still persist, what do you consider a bully squad.
-
@Ni7rogen said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1982975#Comment_1982975
When I talk about the first part I'm talking about "SWF groups greater than 2 needs to be shown to killer in the lobby.".
Okay? I still stand with what I said and I think its unnecessary and not balanced.
-
Adding extra time on gens at base won't solve the issue.
-
Just play the match.
Personally I feel like SWF can't bully killers anymore, simply because of all the nerfs and balance changes on the survivor's side.
You can really only bully a killer nowadays if they're a complete noob.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1982974#Comment_1982974
I don't like friend groups, especially the ones that leave u to die on first hook, or the ones that don't care about doing the objectives and just rushing the killer with flashlights, but they also probably spend the most money at the cost of ruining the balance of the game, so whatever iguess.
The only who can ruin the balance of the game is devs, not the ones that are playing it.
-
@Zarr0ch said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1982975#Comment_1982975
It’s an idea, if you bothered to read more than just the post you might have seen me talk about the ptb and finding the right balance
I did read more, and the more I read the more it made my head hurt.
Not every SWF is a "bully squad" looking to make your experience miserable.
-
@Ni7rogen said:
The first part, yes.
All the rest, no.
The only simple and nice solution would be have a link between survivors when they're playing together, just like Overwatch did long time ago when people play together, what is the issue that comes with it, killers would quit at 3 or 4-man squad, and probably BHVR doesn't want the red ranks significantly drop down because not everyone would play against them.
You think a 10% speed buff just because people are playing with friends is balanced?
-
DBD is the only game where the community tries to punish playing with friends.
-
Both sides can have more of an advantage than the other through-out each match. No side truly has an advantage all the time.
-
@Thunderous_670 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1981970#Comment_1981970
You obviously didn't really read what I said, I said bloodlust is important for those times you face a god looper, other times not so much, also why are you being toxic for? Maybe if you actually pay attention to what I'm saying you wouldn't being saying stupid ######### like that, damn this game really does have a ######### community.
But most survivors aren't good loopers in the first place. And even then if you're facing a good looper, you should at least try and find ways to mind game them and throw them off. Or you can chase other survivors who aren't as good at looping.
-
Please tell me you're trolling.
-
You can't reduce toxicity, it will always occur and there's nothing you can do about it.
-
@Thunderous_670 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1981169#Comment_1981169
No dude, keep the bloodlust, if there was no bloodlust, then I really wouldn't be winning games against god-tier loopers on double t-walls, it'd just be an infinite for me, I don't get how bloodlust is unfair, it's just there to help shorten chases if it goes on for too long.
If you're getting to the point where you rely on bloodlust every chase you get in you should quit the game.
-
@brokedownpalace said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1981889#Comment_1981889
No why? Are they a fan of ugly fashion?
He's the king of ugly fashion.
-
@Raja said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1981776#Comment_1981776
You act like bloodlust is some great boon when quite clearly it isn't since I have ran killers numerous times for long periods without using meta perks like dead hard. You can literally get a killer to break a pallet and boom no bloodlust.
I stopped playing killer when they turned it off last time and I'm sure the rest of the killer skeleton crew did. If want bloodlust taken away then it is only fair these perks I have mentioned get taken away.
It's not fair, both of them are incomparable. When the devs finally balance out loops, they're gonna remove bloodlust from the game and guess whats gonna happen to exhaustion perks. They're gonna stay.
-
@EvanSnowWolf said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1981776#Comment_1981776
https://media.tenor.com/images/8947ad074b1ae0567960ff354fc518e7/tenor.gif
Get bloodlust to go off, then the next time the Survivor drops a pallet, kick it. Tell me what happens.
You kick it, then you'll get it back in 15 seconds. I say it last forever because it doesn't go away in chase. As long as you don't kick a pallet it will last as long as the chase.
-
@Raja said:
If bloodlust go then speed boost, lithe and dead hard also go for equality.
That’s not how it works, those perks are temporarily used in chase. Bloodlust last forever.
-
I'd much rather play in a super sweaty swf, than play with randoms that don't know what they're doing but somehow got in red ranks.
-
@Boss said:
It won't affect my gameplay, but i'm expecting Survivors will send me some death threats in the chat for killing Alphabet Survivors
Well you shouldn't be receiving any hate. Unless you blatantly admitted that you killed said survivor for that reason.
-
@Pirate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1980439#Comment_1980439
You did not ask a question! You wrote a word! I am not fortune seer to understand a complex question by one word.
I said "What?". I expected you to rephrase your statement and make it a little more clear but I guess not.
-
@Pirate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1980434#Comment_1980434
Unfortunatly we live in a stupid world where it would likely to cause a decrease in player base if the character is very oppressive/shocking in his life-style for some people
You didn't answer my question.
-
@Pirate said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1980419#Comment_1980419
Unfortunatly we live in a stupid world where it would like to decrease it by a lot if the character is very oppressive/shocking in his life-style
What?
-
@HellDescent said:
No. We don't.
What the hell do you mean "No. We don't".
-
@JackFrostMan said:
or maybe people should stop having a panic attack over a reskin in a game that falls apart every other update. What the ######### does making a survivor gay, bi, trans, or whatever actually do to the game?
Sure, maybe more people play because they get a character they like, but news flash. You don't like it? Just don't buy the survivor. Magical, I know, but you don't need to buy every DLC.
I know! It's magical! Not having to buy stuff you don't agree with!
It can increase the games player base by a lot if they added a survivor of the LGBTQ. But you don't understand that somehow.
-
Dude there is so much people arguing about the possibility of a LGBTQ survivor its crazy.
-
@Thunderous_670 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1979512#Comment_1979512
It's a big part of the left's campaign, even if you can see it yourself.
Okay, but adding a character part of the LGBTQ doesn’t introduce politics in to the game.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1979430#Comment_1979430
Bugs and map issues have been present for 4 years yet untouched. Who HASN'T complained about say Haddonfield at some point? They don't care dude.
Dude this forum post has nothing to do with Haddonfield.
-
What does the LGBTQ have to do with politics.
-
Trick Question! It isn't.
-
@TheButcher6641 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1979149#Comment_1979149
I have no objection to Christmas costumes. They don't look out of place imo.
So you're telling me dressing up as a literal gift on Christmas doesn't look out of place in a game where its life or death. But having lashes and make up on "Doesn't fit the aesthetic." or "Looks out of place."
-
@TheButcher6641 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1979135#Comment_1979135
That is not what I said at all. If it's a guy and he doesn't have a beard or massive eyelashes/crazy makeup I'm fine with it.
Oh but its fine if I'm running around in a Christmas onesie? Or if my character is dressed like an Elf or a Christmas Gift?
-
@tortrader said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/230691/we-need-more-men-of-color
Person of color is such a lame American term.
In the real world we call these People.
In the real world, if you aren't white you're considered a POC. Hate to break it to you.
-
@Claudette_Baguette said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1978347#Comment_1978347
As I said, we don't even know if all are straight... There is barely any relationship talk in the lore anyway so why should there be LGBTIQ+ lore if straight lore isnt there either like who cares?
Heterosexual relationships have been mentioned a lot in dbd lore but okay.
-
@TheButcher6641 said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1979042#Comment_1979042
It was an example.
I have no objection to people expressing themselves however they see fit irl but I just don't think that a drag queen survivor would really fit into the dbd aesthetic.
That doesn't sound like much of an example to me.
-
@bm33 said:
Where is the picture of the face showing that character is a drag queen?
Pretty sure that they're just assuming the new survivor will be a drag queen because they are part of the LGBTQ.
-
@OniWantsYourMacaroni said:
That's how some people act like when they try to "discuss" why the addition of a LGBT+ character is bad:
This is so accurate it hurts.