BioX
BioX
About
- Username
- BioX
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
because the devs are pretty bad at a lot of things?
-
@Product said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2307991#Comment_2307991
A bad killer can't m1 and catch people with perma bloodlust?
sure? but a bad killer cannot apply enough pressure to prevent gens getting done and totems getting cleanced before the exit gates are opened and everyone escapes, that is kinda what the entire game is about from the killer perspective and what the definition is of being a "bad killer".
-
I pretty much never see anyone claim killers are OP
-
@JustWhimsical said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2307965#Comment_2307965
I edited my previous post to clarify why its not useful or particularly nice to say. Also, what does that even mean please don't say things like that it just sounds weird and makes me uncomfortable. x-x Though I will add this to help you understand why it's not really that nice or great of you to say. :c - I actually wanted to have a discussion with people on perk builds not for someone to just randomly say "just use no perks lol" it's kind of contradictory and neither answers my post nor adds anything meaningful to it. This is a post for people to reply, actual answers and not opinions it's like asking "what's the best perk build to use for being sneaky as a survivor" and you going and saying "just do gens lol". It is not helpful and not useful so please don't do that, you arent helping anyone. :( -
Guess English is not your first language, "panties in a knot" is just a way of saying "getting upset".
Anywho, yes I get what you are asking, all im saying is that it does not matter, usually people ask for builds that complement killers etc to get the most out of them but with the nurse, her inherent power makes her so strong (same with hag really) that perks are a luxury she does not need.
I never said not to run perks (though you could, easily), I said it does not matter what you picked because you dont need anything, so just have fun and try out some stuff.
-
reminds of old freddy where you auto locked on the person NOT in the dreamstate with the person in the dreamstate right next to them, good times good times.
(still miss old freddy immensely though, all he needed was nonsense like that fixed)
anywho, to avoid this you can A. time it so that you grab the person going for the unhook or B, have a bit of patients till the animation is over and then hit someone, its just kinda like the hatch stand off in a bit, its an inevitable bit of interaction really.
(and yes we all know how cheap BT is, dont even start)
-
@Product said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2307975#Comment_2307975
https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/0JTB5B5H89ON/spongebob.jpg
Saying "dO AlL dUlL tOtEmS" is not legitimate counterplay.
That's like me saying "jUsT eAt AlL oF tHeIr DeCiSiVe StRiKeS" when you complain about decisive strike being a thing.
Throwing the match to cleanse a bunch of dull totems is stupid and boring and most of the time the killer doesn't even have noed because noed isn't even that good, it's just unfair and unfun BS for the survivor that happened to be in a chase when the final generator was completed.
And yes actually, I don't always happen to have a spare 3 minutes to cleanse a bunch of dull totems against a 4k hour infectious fright nurse that downs my teammates in 12 seconds
yep, so once again confirming my point, NOED is only good in the hands of a killer who is already doing well, same for the DS argument you made.
If survivors are bad and you eat those DS's while only 1 gen has been done and everyone is self caring in a corner...then yeah you can just eat those and not worry about it.
for survivors, If 1 gen is remaining and lets say only 1 person has been hooked, you have no excuse to not go for those totems. If you want to take the risk that NoeD might not be in play, thats on you, dont cry afterwards.
-
@JustWhimsical said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2307904#Comment_2307904
Like dude, if you have nothing to say at all, don't comment. It's just rude. x-x This is for people to reply to that actually play Nurse, like I don't care what your opinion on Nurse is I am asking a specific question for people who play Nurse, you obviously don't so don't bother replying.
dont know why you are getting your panties in a knot, my answer is legit, its nurse, you dont even need perks with her so use whatever you want or use nothing at all, if you know how to play nurse perks matter little
-
@SPADESinst said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2307907#Comment_2307907
Honestly just wanna hear the funny cases of what happens during matches for some people, Im normality always tired but this was the first time I actually threw a match because of it
oh well I have had gaming sessions where you are soooo tired you really cannot keep your eyes open I have found myself just standing still basically falling asleep infront of the pc etc.
-
Said this a million times already: Noed is only good (and very good at that) in the hands of a strong killer.
If the killer is bad then survivors have no excuse not to do the totems, if the totems are too tall an order to do then clearly the killer is not that bad and is applying enough pressure.
If the killer is good then survivors will barely have time to do the gens and wont have time to deny NoeD which is where the killer can make use of that.
it truely is as simple as that, same really with survivor meta perks, in the hands of good players it becomes nigh impossible to deal with while in the hands of noobs its a non issue for the most part.
-
its probably clear now, I would just like to add that nemesis's design is one of those slighty shimmering moments where I can respect the devs for something....which is sad, but yeah I really dig how the infection of Nemesis works vs Plague, its both similair but also completely unique.
-
question, is it possible to do a reverse stretch res for killers? get less vertical information in favour of more horizontal information? (aka shadow born without needing the perk)
-
so you are asking if we ever play the game when we know we will underperform? I mean....idk when im tired I dont really feel like playing games so I guess thats a no from me.
-
its nurse.....who cares about builds
-
you are expecting way too much for the insane amount of cash people put down for a skin yo, this is BHVR after all, not....just about...any...other...developer...out there.
-
@GoodBoyKaru said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2304977#Comment_2304977
Locking the file won't do anything. Nvidia control panel changes the layout of your monitor and you then just set it to full screen and it comes out looking like this in recordings. Very stretched
(I really hated playing with that res but without it the game wouldn't let me keep a stable framerate since 5.0.0. Native keeps freezing on me and this somehow doesn't and its really frustrating because I don't want to be forced to play with that much advantage just to get a stable damn framerate.)
they could most def do something about it on their end, there is extra information that this stretched res gives, that extra information should not be an option, those extra pixels, and they can most def take that away.
-
cant make laws you cant enforce, but I wish they did something with the code that locked the aspect ratio etc so this would be impossible to do.
-
They dont listen to otz and imo that is good.
-
This is a weird thread
-
@DwarvenTavern said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2304876#Comment_2304876
Oh no, the photo is unable to load
yeah replaced it :P
-
@DwarvenTavern said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2304734#Comment_2304734
Apologies, my memory seems to be failing me. Who's the one on the far right? Is that original Mr. X?
it is essentially that yes, Mr X is one of a number of Tyrants like them, type T-00, in the RE Damnation movie (not worth the watch) they took the original design of Tyrant T-00 (that Mr X is also part of) and updated it a bit:
-
funny how you just assume that that is a unpopulair opinion.
I take it you base that on seeing many threads start about it needing a nerf and we ignore the many people replying its fine?
-
Game? No
Devs? Yes
-
@Sypherpathic said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2302138#Comment_2302138
This response makes no sense. Again, I think perhaps you need to realize that you either don't do a good job yourself intentionally or you have a low opinion of others because they aren't you.
Explain how it does not make sense....and then explain how you come to that conclusion and also explain why you think everyone in the world does their best at what they do.
-
@Sypherpathic said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2302112#Comment_2302112
I think that this likely says more about your own work ethic than that of others.
idk what fantasy world you live in....and then claim that you think people on this forum are 10.....
When I was younger cartoons told me that the biggest things plaging the planet were poachers and the environment and that racism is something from the far far FAR past....but then....I grew up.
Imagine if this is truely the outcome of a world where everyone does their best at the work they do.....yikez man.
-
@Sypherpathic said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2302099#Comment_2302099
So do you have a job? Do you have a work ethic? Do you deliberately do a bad job?
Do you think that people working elsewhere, because they aren't you, don't do their best?
im 100% sure PLENTY of people dont do their best no, and these devs most certainly dont, well they do their best to do as little work as possible, put in as little effort as they can while making a lot of money, that they do very well.
-
"and understand that those working on it want to produce the best product they can and will do their best to deliver it."
this is a joke right?, this entire post?
Actually come to think of it this is a massive dev burn post, claiming the best they can do is this hot garbage, the RE map having to be pulled after people playing on it on the ptb being the most recent embarrassment
Imagine how sad you must feel for them if this actually is their best.....yikez.
-
Git gud or stop playing him is all I say about that, he does not need a buff.
-
just....try....it.....out
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2301360#Comment_2301360
No, mixing sets was always a glitch and everybody knew that. Don’t make a fool out of yourself. This has nothing to do with them being scummy or whatever insult you want to use here. Sets were always meant to be sets, they are advertised as such before you buy them, when buying you are forced to buy it as a set. There is no excuse for anyone to now act like something was taken away from them.
And you know what? I knew that and I didn’t buy those sets because of it. I am not agreeing with sets being sets without a reason. But I don’t act like I didn’t have the info
Im not going to repeat myself again sorry
-
Phone is simply way too old
-
@Mooks said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2301306#Comment_2301306
This is just about optional cosmetic skins, you are obsessing way too much over this topic and it seems really unhealthy what you are writing here.
if it’s just a cashgrab, don’t give them money for it. If other people like those cosmetics and think they are worth their money - who are you to judge them?
BHVR never promised to let the glitch in the game and buying and assuming it won’t get fixed was just foolish. They just said nobody gets banned because of it, they never said it is now a feature anyone should expect to stay.
There are actual issues in this game, especially with this update such as console performance issues. optional cosmetics -that by the way all exist for cashgrabs, not only the sets- are may be a minor inconvenience, but nothing as bad as you make it out to be here.
I only agree with you that there are more actual issues with the game, but atleast that involves a product you already paid money for, not milking consumers for more money under false promises.
And like I said, its a scam, not something you can sue them for because they are smart enough to indeed not state anything, they make sure the idea is conveyed without committing, that is what is sooo dang scummy and slimey and simple dishonest about it.
They should have said "we are not going to ban you but we are working on making sure you cannot mix and match sets so dont buy anything on that assumption" that would have been the open and fair thing to do.
And again, under these super silly and weak excuses they could just lock these "licensed skins" of which they claim the dev has an issue with but leave the rest, like Jane's skins, or Kate etc, alone, but nope.
It saddens me that you are so agreeing with these kinds of practices, it says a lot about you really that you would rather claim the people trusting the company are stupid, victim blaming at its finest.
-
Well I can tell you that I dont tunnel so no, not every one of them
It is a pretty unique game in how the community is actively keeping the game alive but also seemingly seeking to destroy itself by making sure the other side is having a bad time.
-
Lets be honest, the sets are a cashgrab and one of the worst ones ever, its also completely transparant how evil it is regarding it unintentionally being shown that they dont have to be sets.
And think of the logic even, Capcom only wants money, they could not care less if Leon in this game wears a clown nose if that means they get money from skins sold (like you mentioned, the quality of many characters is extremely lacking) but hey, "if we lock it we can make people ignore the fact that we did not change the head at all and make them pay more money because the head is now just part of the package"! brilliant!
Leatherface was a set and suddenly...oh our bad, not a set teehee.
So many dont have to be sets like the one for the twins....but no.
And want to get to the most disgusting part? people being afraid to be banned for glitching sets in order to mix n match (which already says a LOT about the relationship and trust between the community and the devteam) so the devs say you wont be banned, players happy, investing WAY too much money to show off their combinations they are proud of (my friend included) and now....oh sorry, its all undone, after collecting the money......
Honestly this company....I wish this game was bought out be LITERALLY any publisher that would set matters straight, EA was once voted worst company but I would EASLY rank BHVR above it for these kind of anti consumer practices, its honestly just a scam for which they cannot be punished by law, ez money.
Now if only the community would see them for what they are and stop being atleast sets......
(also I really cant see how these people can life with themselves)
-
@Elena said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2298118#Comment_2298118
That's a pretty gaslighting way of putting it, people have different opinions.
yeah and its my opinion that you take the game way to seriously if you have a problem with that map?
-
idk, I can say that I loved twins from day 1, just love how fast, creepy and kinda funny Victor is and the dynamic nature of the two.
though sadly when playing against them its like playing against most hag players, in principle the killers have a lot of potential but everyone defaults to the lowest common denominator and just camp...
-
@Boss said:
This happened to be uploaded yesterday...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlBMFDI7Rz4
Great channel btw, it consists of just lil snippets.
omg that is funny af
-
I dont mind it myself, you take the game way to serious if you do really.
-
@DanielPaint said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/2297689#Comment_2297689
"First Bugfix" How is a company like bhvr not able to fix everything in one update?
while I agree with your original statement/point of view, this remark is just silly really.
-
@Uistreel said:
Insidious on ghost face, make the survivors think his shroud reveal has become even more broken than before
straight up lol, also thanks at everyone else here for the replies <3
-
funny right "dont DC, you are screwing over the team, you are ruining the match"
but unhooking with the killer behind you purely so you have a shot at getting those points at the expensive of just about everything from the other random survivor.....thats fine.
-
@TheClownIsKing said:
I’ve had to resort to my “You Don’t Care About My Fun, So I Don’t Care About Yours” build/strategy.
Doc with Distressing, Coulrophobia, Overwhelming Presence, Unnerving Presence, Iridescent King, and Iridescent Queen, AND LOTS of Slugging.
Yeah... deal with it. No more playing nice.
then why do you even play at all anymore, seems like mentally there is no real winning there.
-
generic question about any hobby ever?
-
imo yes, its up to the market to choose, if its too much, then dont buy anything.
funny thing for me personally is, if they did a lot more discounts (and specifically discounts on PARTS of outfits) and stopped with the arbitrary locked sets, I would have invested tons more money into this game.
but no, slap in the face 15 bucks for chris redfield and you cannot mix and match, hard pass.
-
@KateMain86 said:
The fact we can even earn them and buy characters and cosmetics that are also sold for auric cells which costs real money to purchase is a very fair thing. They are after all trying to make money off the game they made and they didn't have to offer us a way to buy most of the things in this game just by playing it. Just keep playing the game and you'll start seeing those shards add up faster than you think. Do your daily survivor/killer match for bonus experience and just try to have fun and not think about the grind.
take a look at red dead online's outlaw pass or warframe's nightwave (ftp game as well), I mean the rift grind was also reduced for a reason.
-
@MadLordJack said:
They're a marketing tool, nothing more. And not even a well maintained one at that, given the people in the program that are definitely not good marketing.
its hard to keep being possitive of a product that is so consistenly failing.
recent memory, the skins for Leon and Jill being separate in the ptb and suddenly a locked set on release.....like how transparantly evil/money grabbing is bhvr really.
-
sure but what is the point?
-
im sorry what?
-
because so many "gamers" today dont have a spine or self respect
-
Yeah these devs make waaay too muhc money for what they deliver, but the market decides, if yall would stop supporting those dang sets for example.....15 dollars for that chris redfield skin.....but no.
-
google is your friend you know:
A Simple Guide for remove the 62 fps cap in dead by daylight...though you can skip the engine file, in GameUserSettings.ini you can just go to the fps counter and change it to whatever higher number you want and then set Vsync to false.
As mentioned, set to file to read only or the game will revert these changes.
(and no, you dont have to be afraid to be banned for it, the gamerusersettings file is literally the file that stores all changes you apply in the ingame menu like graphics settings (for what laughable amount are available ingame) and sensitivity and volume etc)