WRussoW
WRussoW
About
- Username
- WRussoW
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- —
Comments
-
@Quol said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1369346#Comment_1369346
That's a fair point too. I as a killer don't really care about what people use (unless it's Ace's yellow pajamas or Dwight's bicycle helmet which I think look stupid) and had things been different I might have even bought Lisa, this is my personal taste but she is by far the best looking female character/skin in the game.
But at the same time I don't think this "protest" is that big of a deal. It's like 10 killers max on forums saying they want to tunnel Lisa's most of which won't even go through with it because, this might just be me, I've seen like 2 Lisa survivors since the dlc dropped.
Hm, interesting, I
moriedkilled 4 Lisas today. For some reason, most of them were twitching. -
I mean, at least give her unique voice, lore page and name, that's it.
-
So... Can someone try Moriing someone near it and show us the screenshot? No?
-
That's why I play as the Spirit, my nerve cells restored quickly after I started maining her. I mean, nerve cells do not restore after dying but still.
-
Asked the same question. I saw @MandyTalk saying that they're looking into it.
-
@BoiltOver said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1368532#Comment_1368532
Because it's probably just out of their hands. Cheryl is a licensed character from Konami, we have to remember that. It's not as simple as them saying "well we want to add different voices, so we will" they have to negotiate that out with Konami, and if it's selling well enough without then they might as well not waste the money to get Konami to let them.
The devs' response to this thread would mean nothing besides acknowledging the issue (which they basically already did in the qna) unless it was, "yes we have talked this out with Konami and came to an agreement that voices and such can be added for Lisa and maybe Alessa too."
Alessa is fine since she's the reincarnation, so technically it's okay for her to be just a different look. She's the same person as Cheryl. The only problem here is Lisa.
I'm not sure why Konami wouldn't let devs give a voice and the lobby name to Lisa. Linked cosmetics are here to save the original look of a character, strange policy but I can at least see the reason. The issue with Lisa is beyond my understanding. The only real explanation to me is that the devs considered it not necessary.
-
@BoiltOver said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1368485#Comment_1368485
Might as well be with how terrible of a way it is to get your point across.
There were 2 thread. 1 childish with describing the trend, 1 mature with discussing concerned. Guess which one was viewed more. Yet still we don't have any proper respond from the devs.
-
@BoiltOver said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1368286#Comment_1368286
Sweaty I see the difference, but at least Legion dcers were breaking the rules for a good reason back then, although I never supported it. You're just being petty.
And Lisa protest here is just to bully people, right?
-
@BoiltOver said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1367390#Comment_1367390
Well here you go.
I disagreed with dcing against old Legion even though they were entirely unfun to play against, but I did not voice my side because I wasn't active in any Dbd places. And I also disagree with tunneling and camping Lisas. :]
The difference lies in one being broken, and unfun to play against, and the other having no affect on gameplay whatsoever.
The first one is breaking the game's rules and the second one is just favoring the usage of your Mori. You see the difference? I would still waste my Mori on someone, it's MY choice on which survivor I will waste it. It happens that this survivor is Lisa, that's it. ❤️
-
@Wubalubadubdub03 said:
No one actually likes dbd, we just play it.
This one.
-
@Peanits said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1367299#Comment_1367299
Petty people will be petty, for sure. Although that wouldn't affect Cheryl specifically if that were the case, only Lisa. Cheryl is just like any other DLC survivor.
Lisa is not targeted just because she's expensive. Her price makes perfect sense. She's a cosmetic, that's 1080 cells. And she's a character, that's 500 cells. She can't be customized (no prestige), so subtract 100 cells. And you get 1480 cells, no issues with that. Her cosmetic part is okay, but her character part is not. Every other characters has unique perks, lobby name, lore info, voice and standing animation. She has unique standing animation and the perks are exchanged to the fact that you don't need to level her up as she shares the same bloodweb with Cheryl... So... Where is everything else?
-
No, her price is okay. It's her execution that makes people angry. She costs nearly like a character (500) + cosmetic (1080), so she must have separate lore, voice and name in a lobby. Do we have it? Nope.
-
Don't be afraid, Cheryl is okay. People just know that you're not maxed out, so you're an easier target. But Lisa.... Let's not talk about her.
-
@DrDeepwound said:
Us Legion players are sitting back like,... uh huh, tell us all about it. When Legion came out we were told "#########" etc for playing him.
This one right here. Noone got a single negative thing to say about the Legion DC protest despite it breaking the legit game rules. Here we have Lisa, people just Mori her or camp, people just use in-game features on you. And all of a sudden survivors go "this is wroooong, noooo!!!". C'mon.
-
@Nonfunctional said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1365183#Comment_1365183
No I'm not projecting. I simply understand than $15 is not $15.
Someone who earns 5 figures a years looks at $15 very different than someone that earns 6 figures a year. And who are you or I to tell anyone what value they should put on their money.
Nice textbook attempt at gaslighting though. When you double down on it for your response I'll pretend to act surprised.
It's kinda a common knowledge? Value should stay the same for all people. Wealthier people are the ones who control the value, so it's their responsibility to treat money properly because they are the controlling minority. You do not approve something to be much more expensive when in reality it's not worth it and and less wealthy people could get an access to.
We have 3 people who have spare 2$ and you who have spare 100$. Imagine a bunch of candies. In reality each candy it costs 1$. But the person who sells it puts the price of 100$. Now, if nobody buys it, the seller would have to reduce the price until it matches the price it should have. The price would reduce to 2$ and everyone would buy it, including you and 3 other people. But instead of waiting and showing concern you just buy the candy for 100$. The price will remain the same because of the people like you. And three people who should be able to afford a product can't buy it now. Because YOU don't treat money properly. It was YOU who didn't let people get the candy.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1366213#Comment_1366213
Oh sorry ehm punishing people for playing a character you personally feel is too expensive. You're still extremely scummy and toxic and if anything you're the only one who is blind. You manage you actually convince yourself you have every right to ruin peoples fun solely because they bought a skin you think they shouldn't have.
Instead of listening to what we say, you repeat your thought over and over again. The dialog stagnating because you can't even address the topic we are referring to. Instead of giving a comment about the things we write, you just say "you're toxic, you're scummy, you're toxic, you're scummy". Or "you're ruining someone's fun for liking a character". Pathetic.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1366043#Comment_1366043
Well then use your cells and quit crying the devs already have your money its not like putting cells into getting her is gonna give them the cells or anything. Stop punishing others because they like a character your entire argument is scummy and reeks of spoiled rich girls whos dad gives them a car but they're mad because its not the color they envisioned it to be.
They have my money for other stuff, not Lisa. I gave them money for other reasons. Let your braincells work for a bit.
Read my comment again, I'll repeat it over and over, again and again. We do not punish you for liking a character, we punish you for supporting a scam and being blind about it.
Your car compassion is not accurate. You don't sell a cheap car for the price of a luxury car. That's the issue here.
If you're gonna say "you beat us for liking a character", I'll assume you don't even try reading my comments.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1366024#Comment_1366024
Thats quite literally whats happening and a perfect analogy
The party invitations says there will be sweets. You come and there is a bunch of licorice chops. Feels trashy, don't you think?
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1366001#Comment_1366001
Where was this outrage when the devs made a $15 pig skin? Where were you screaming how horrible it was that The Pig got a leather jacket for $15? Face it you're entitled and think unless you have it, no one should have it. Im supporting my favorite game and favorite character but hey its fine to be toxic as long as someone wears a skin you don't like right? "B-but I like the skin!!!!!!!" You can like the skin all you want! You can be mad all you want! Stop taking it out on OTHER people just because you wanted it to cost less. Also a skin can range from 50 Auric cells to now 1480 since wow its a higher rarity so therefore it would cost more wow shocking right?
You can repeat all you want the same thing. The answer won't change.
I literally have enough Auric Cells on my account to buy it. Stop trying to demonize me. It's not "ugh, I don't have it, so noone else can have it", it's "I don't support a scam". And I described you why it's a scam.
You're mainly supporting the lowering of the quality by buying Lisa. You can buy things that are worth buying to support without any side effects, you know?
Did you read my comment? It makes perfect sense why the skin costs more. The price is legit, now, we only ask to make the skin worth it.
Stop. Realize the issue. People are being angry not because the price is high but because it doesn't match the quality. And the quality standard is stated by the devs themselves. Not us.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1366007#Comment_1366007
Actually it does because just buying $10 worth of auric cells isn't enough to buy the skin you have to buy an additional $5 worth of auric cells for it.
You have enough Auric Cells left to buy a rare skin piece. Plus, people usually buy skin pieces, not the whole set, that's why nobody was this mad.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1365913#Comment_1365913
Also did you not forget the Pig skin which is $15?
It's not 15$. It costs much less Auric Cells.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1365913#Comment_1365913
My problem isn't the skin my problem is you and people like you who are so selfish that unless something is worth what you wan't it to be worth everyone who likes it HAS to suffer. You're quite literally saying no ones allowed to buy or like it because you don't like it which is so dumb and pointless. The skin is literally fine it just doesn't fit your little standards of what it should be. And once again basic common sense tells you this skin would cost more since its a higher rarity than Very Rare and Very Rare skins are already $10 so what did you expect? $11? Literally green skins are $10 as well so whys it oh so terrible Lisa is $5 when she comes with more than a normal skin?
Stop trying to look innocent here. You know that you're not being targeted just because you like the skin. I like the skin too! You support bad decisions devs make towards cosmetics. It's not my own opinion, it's freaking common sense. Use your freaking brain and realize it. The devs themselves made a standard, a character costs 500 Auric Cells. And a skin costs 1080 Auric Cells. 1080+500=1580. Subtract 100 cells and you get Lisa's price. She's a character in a form of a skin money wise. Instead of perks you get a the same bloodweb so you don't need to put bloodpoints into her, and those 100 cells are her not having a prestige. So, if she's a character, she must have a separate name in a lobby and her own voice. She doesn't have them. (And you can't customize her.) It's NOT my standard, it's the standard the devs made. And you support its lowering. So you're still okay with it? Ouch.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1365856#Comment_1365856
Also to add on I spent my money because I expected even less than we got I expected solely just Lisa not even a new lobby animation or anything but we got more than I expected and I was happy with it because I knew this wasn't Lisa being added as a whole new chapter survivor this is simply a skin of a pre existing character but I was fine with it because its my favorite character from my favorite game being put into my 2nd favorite game of all time as a playable character.
Oh, so we are the bad ones who don't see issues with paying gold nuggets for an apple? You're ready to waste this much money on a in-game model even without animations? We are the ones having issues?! Wow.
-
@kate_best_girl said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1365856#Comment_1365856
I have a tough money situation I had started saving for this chapter the second it was announced because I did the reasonable thing and figured it would cost $15 to $20. Lisa is my favorite character in Silent Hill and I do not think for one second she was poorly implented just because she doesn't have her own custom unique voice which in itself is extremely hard to do due to the current world situation. You're EXTREMELY entitled if you punish someone else just because YOU'RE unsatisfied that she costs $5 more than a normal skin. How is it not selfish to you that everyone has to suffer because you're unhappy? Im unhappy with when I get teabagged so do I punish all survivors by face camping and tunneling just because they're not actively fighting against toxic survivor behavior? No I'm not. Quite frankly its just you thinking you deserve more and more while ignoring everything around you its gross and I can't believe this community thinks its okay to act this childish.
You have issues with defining proper price and quality ratio. Lisa costs nearly like 3 characters with separate lore, voices, perks, lobby names, skins, etc. People were okay with her not having her own perks, maybe lore. But other stuff? Where is it? That's a bit too much. It's not healthy to support that and you know it. And you know people are rightfully displeased with Lisa. But instead of understanding the situation and helping, you whine and say how bad people are!
That's why people decided to act like this. You're being ignorant here and the only way to get any kind of help from you is making you create a thread where you discuss the issue. How else are we supposed to deal with people like you who will support anything? What do we need to do? Eat it up?
-
In my opinion, it's not to just punish you, it's to make you show your concern on the forums so the issue would get more feedback.
Plus, you think only about yourselves here when you're being fine with the current Lisa state. Let me explain. I want to buy Lisa, I really do. But the feeling that she isn't a separate character doesn't allow me to do so. Do my 15$ really worth wasting on her? It's mentally hard to be in this state because I'm a fan of Silent Hill and Lisa is one of my favorite characters but technically her in-game state is bad. I can't ignore her because I'm a fan and I can't buy her because her current state is bad. I'm happy you can waste your 15$ without a second thought but some people consider everything before spending money. I would just watch you seeing your favorite character being poorly put into your favorite game for the highest possible price. Instead of rightfully asking for proper Lisa treatment you support this type of marketing. You don't care about Silent Hill fans with tough money issues in the first place and the Silent Hill fans don't care about you. Yet still they are the only wrong people in your story as if you did nothing wrong.
-
@TheOhioHutcH said:
Have you watched pauly Esther's video?
Polyester not. Sure how he spells it for the channel off the top of my head
Oh, so now we call holding M1 in 2 specific spots a puzzle, I see, I see.
-
In my opinion, puzzles should be a plan B for survivors when gens are no longer valid. (2 survivor - 5/4/3 gens left) Instead of immersing until one of your teammates dies, you both need to stealth and work with your brains to complete a less time consuming objective. It's not like you depend on each other, you just fulfil the task much faster if you do so.
Also, if you do the puzzle beforehand, it should somehow help you escape when you're the last survivor. Maybe the doors would open slowly during the EGC.
Now, it's hard to tell what type of puzzle would suit the game. But I think it would be something like "there are several pieces of the item you need to collect in a certain spot, each piece is hidden in a box/chest/etc. that you can unlock by completing the random puzzles (Like, the simplest types you can think of, idk, color-sudoku)".
-
@FogLurker said:
Don't be sad that it's gone, be happy for the time you had.
I mean, my experience in a nutshell with the chase music:
PTB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDgQdr8ZkTwLive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHEe653pxxYYeah, sure, thanks letting us listen to the PTB version. Good times.
-
@MonsterInMyMind said:
Nope you will 100% get banned for audio files EAC said they don't care about png files but when it comes to audio files you will catch a hot ban.
Damn. Well, okay.
-
@tixerp said:
Tfw missed potential for SH2 Pyramid Head chase music remixed for DBD. Maybe with a bit of inspiration from "My Heaven" from SH1.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXsbCg2y76c
Also, no white noise, or knife scraping as a part of his Terror Radius. Good job on the DLC BHVR... But come on, man. Could've been so cool.
I heard Akira Yamaoka actually made the music for this DLC, which is interesting because I don't really hear it? I don't want to discredit the man himself, but I was hoping for it to sound a bit more like something from SH than Doctors music like you said. Nailed the concept of a dirty industrial track... But I guess I was expecting something more experimental. More metal banging, mechanical pulsating, haunting echoes, etc.
He only helped composing the menu theme. That's why we have this new awful chase music now.
-
I just don't get it, why is it so hard to tell the community about it? @Almo, it's another thread about Lisa, people are clearly not happy with her. Are you planning on adding her new voice once you go back into the studio and changing her lobby name? Are you being quite to avoid strong negative reaction for the community? What's wrong?
-
@Sonzaishinai said:
Just going to drop the analogy i made in the other post here so that people who do this kind of stuff realise how dumb they are
"Bobby (the devs) sell Suzie (lisa players) a new doll (lisa). You notice Suzie payed way to much for what the doll is worth. You can't handle this injustice and decide to get back at Bobby. And you do this by beating Suzie to a pulp and tearing her new doll apart."
Bobby doesn't care about the state of dolls he sells, he only cares about money. And he doesn't care if he'll be beaten up, he's kinda strong and tall to endure your punches. However, you can still get him through Suzie. Let's say we have Megan, who wants the doll too but rightfully wanna see it in a better state for obvious reasons. Megan comes to Suzie and takes her doll away. She comes to Bobby and says "I won't let anyone play with your dolls unless you give us better ones for this price!". Nobody will buy dolls if Megan will takes them away. Bobby has to put afford into his dolls now. He makes same dolls with better quality. Megan buys the new doll and brings back Suzie her better doll. Megan is happy and Suzie is glad her doll is better.
-
@[Deleted User] said:
I don't think so. Ever played killer and had an OoO user against you?
Have fun spending 3 minutes just to catch up to them. And then have to deal with a god pallet. Then spending another minute catching up. Good luck if you're Huntress or Deathslinger.
Damn, playing as the Spirit is really a stroll in this game, I had no issues playing as her on the new map. Guess I need to try out more killers on it. But it will happen soon anyways.
-
@Demonl3y said:
Lol arent this the maps from the original game? Ty.
But yea, the map is pretty good if you memorize it. Also i love it designwise.
That's the best thing about the new map in DBD. You can look up the map from Silent Hill 1 and it still helps!
-
@OniWantsYourMacaroni said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1361949#Comment_1361949
There is no point in arguing about whether the recolors are ugly or not.That's your own opinion.Personnally i enjoyed most of the recolors.Golden Claudette and the blue Hag skin are my favourites.
How do you know that they can't do much because of licensing?
I don't think the devs changed claudettes darker skins because those players got tunneled/camped/moried etc.
They changed her because of the actual feedback and because they realized how unfair these skins were.
Wow, 2 recolors you liked more than the original you totally ignored due to the price bag. Open your eyes, there are so much ugly and rarely used cosmetics and they still make more same looking disgusting pieces of clothing. Trust me, there's a lot of negative feedback that devs may not listen to.
I just assume. It can be a good scapegoat phrase, don't you think?
You must be a newer player than me because killers hated Blendettes more than anything.
Yes, it was feedback but it was't really peaceful if you ask me.
-
Interesting to see how a "childish" thread was viewed this much times and this "mature" thread doesn't have as many views despite the fact that they both appeared at the same time and they both were on the front page for the a good amount of time.
However, this "mature" thread has more likes, comments and less negative feedback. But you can't argue over the fact that the "childish" way of showing concern had had a bigger effect on people.
-
@OniWantsYourMacaroni said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1361774#Comment_1361774
Sorry but this has to be THE dumbest way to show you disappointment with Lisa.
You being upset about the skin,doesn't justify ruining the fun for people who enjoy the skin.
If you want to see some kind of change then you have to do it through proper feedback and not childish behaviour like this.That would probably lead to you being ignored by the devs.
There were numerous proper cosmetic feedbacks. Has anything changed? People had been saying how ugly some cosmetics were. Any updates for them? Nope, they just dumped in the ugliest cosmetics recolors into the Rift, so they would get some profit from them.
Now, Lisa. She's not only a cosmetic, she's a licenced cosmetic. It makes things much more complicated because the excuse "we can't do much" may pop up. Not only that, but the whole issue is caused by her not having her own unique voice and her own lobby name, which is not something a rip-off cosmetic would have. Devs can't properly do things with usual cosmetics and you tell me they'll willingly make Lisa worth buying?
Again, Blendettes were nerfed thanks to the massive feedback. It wasn't nice at all if you can remember, people brought up the strongest stuff against them, camped them, moried them. And thanks to that they changed the darkness of the cosmetics. Only after the in-game rioting.
-
@Darkskies said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1361680#Comment_1361680
@MandyTalk I know you closed the thread that started this horrible behaviour towards players of this game that bought this cosmetic.
Is there anything we can do??
You use the term griefing can we report these people I would love some feedback regarding what we should be doing in regards to this negative behaviour.
Thank you kindly for closing the thread and your time
🐷❤️💖
I just don't get one thing. Remember when the Legion came out?
---- The Legion incident ----
Everyone, even big streamers: "DC against this unplayable BS, noone likes the Legion, they are boring (yet still genrushable)" [Literally violation of the game's rules!!]
Y'all who weren't even waiting: It is what it is, totally approve
---- The Lisa incident ----
Silent Hill fans and people who were hyped for legendary: "Oh wow, that's really disappointing. We afraid that the devs won't do anything with licenced cosmetics because they are too greedy when it comes to skins, so we want to make devs understand that it's not right to treat us like that and we will use totally in-game features to raise awareness that we are not pleased" [No political, racial, etc. stuff, just unpleased customers]
Y'all: It is NOT what it is, CLOSED [When green rank players do it, it's totally fine, when high rank players do that it's a problem all of a sudden???]
Make it make sense please. Just a reminder that thanks to these types of things they brightened up dark cosmetics to help against Blendettes. Just saying.
-
Anyways, tomorrow is Q&A stream, I hope the whole trend wasn't unspotted and devs won't say "we are not planning to add voice and lobby name for Lisa because it's not our priority". They should have gathered enough feedback to realize what their community wants.
-
@LethalPugy said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1361674#Comment_1361674
Why punish me for that tho? That’s like everyone bullying a legion who is susie or joey really.
As you can see, you are displeased about this situation even though you bought the cosmetic you were fine with (when it actually treated horribly in terms of price and quality ratio, by that I mean that it's not a fully functioning character who has voice, lobby name and maybe lore, for THIS price it must have been included). You came on the forum to create a thread saying that there's a certain issue with Lisa that causes players to tunnel and camp you. Yes, you talk about players but you still mean that there's an issue that causes players to act like that. And the issue is clear, numerous threads where created to speak out about it. And threads like these become more and more common to the point the issue is addressed.
Now, it may sound ridiculous, but get one thing clear. Yeah, people kinda displeased with you supporting this scam and kinda wanna punish you for that but it's not the main thing about it. Killers mori, tunnel, camp Lisas not to punish them for liking a skin but to make them frustrated and address the issue as well. Again, even if they don't acknowledge it, they will still complain about this type of behavior. And if devs wanna keep their players happy, they will have to change it because not only the whole situation leads to negative feedback towards skin itself, it also discourages other people from buying it.
-
@UnbeatableAsh said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/161727/new-trend-for-lisa-players
Ok but have you considered: 4man Lisas
Maybe...
-
Cheryl asked the Entity why pop was so strong, the Entity said "you know what?" and gave her the power to deny pop.
-
@TWiXT said:
"This is a Brilliant idea! Really a one of a kind way to show how much we hate the devs! Lets all band together to punish people for throwing money at them! I mean, how Dare those idiots support this games growth and development by throwing an extra $15 bucks at the devs on top of the $7 they already spent for the DLC! I believe it was made just so that those rich, entitled brats could rub it in our faces, and they deserve to be targeted for it! I mean come on, who in their right mind would want to encourage people to spend money on this PoS game, am I right? They need to be made examples of, so that no one will make the same mistake in the future!" - S. Arcastic
We supported in by purchasing the chapter. We want to support it more because I like the character, heck, I like how she looks, her skin is mediocre but not bad. But she it's not okay to ask money for a model which doesn't even have anything. Voice, lore, c'mon, 1480 cells. 1 4 8 0 c e l l s.
-
@Leachy_Jr said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/162015/regarding-this-whole-lisa-garland-fiasco
The problem is that your paying 15 quid for a below average skin. Not only that but it's in a game that:
- Has to be paid for.
- Has a paid battle pass.
- Has other paid for cosmetics.
- Has countless DLC's (which I will admit are a fair price).
When you pay for that skin in a game like this you should 100% get a high quality product. And what do we get? It's a mediocre looking skin with a different model with not even separate lore, sounds or even an in game lobby name.
And i'm paying 15 for that? Haha, no.
(Also I know it's "only a cosmetic", it should at least be good if they're charging that god damn much for it and it should absolutely have some additional effects (own voice etc) if it's going to be the most expensive one).
This one. I really don't get people who defend devs at this point.
-
@Sonzaishinai said:
Wait what? Let's put this in simpler terms
Bobby (the devs) sell Suzie (lisa players) a new doll (lisa). You notice Suzie payed way to much for what the doll is worth. You can't handle this injustice and decide to get back at Bobby. And you do this by beating Suzie to a pulp and tearing her new doll apart.
See where your logic took a wrong turn?
Huh... Okay, you've got a point here. They problem here is when Susie knows that the doll is bad and still gives money to Bobby. So Bobby could make more dolls.
-
@Ihatelife said:
Give her a break. She already suffered too much in Silent Hill. 😭
I K N O W. (I even had a thread talking about it.) We want better for her. :(
-
@Hag.is.Dtier said:
https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/comment/1359397#Comment_1359397
And taking it out on other players is the way to go is it...
As I said pathetic community.
Okay, let's say that the devs don't listen. The cosmetic kinda got sold because people where expecting it to be a new character in form of a skin as it was advertised. What are you supposed to do? Just eat it up?
-
@DWolfAlpha said:
A full purple outfit costs 1080.
And I can get it with shards or get a separate pieces. But I have to buy a full set for Lisa. For this much money. And get an incomplete character. You're fine with it?
-
@OldHunterLight said:
Don't give us killer mains a bad name please, let them use whatever character they want unless a p3 blendette, those deserve a mori but let them use whatever they want.......
So we mori people who use cosmetic advantage but we ignore people who support this kind of scam? Trust me, if I hadn't played the game I would think Lisa is a separate character with different voice. I'd buy her immediately.
-
@UberSolus said:
If you don't like the skin for whatever reason you can. 1. Not buy the skin. 2. Provide feedback in a meaningful way rather than targeting random people because they liked the skin. Such an immature way of trying to get a point across.
The feedback is there, can't hear anything from the devs. ❤